The analysis of 137Cs accumulation by plants of forest, marsh, meadow, psamophytic, and ruderal communities in the Dnipro River floodplain (Ukraine) was carried out. It was established that plants of psammophytic and ruderal habitats are characterized by insignificant 137Cs pollution (from 334 to 16.2 Bq/kg) and a low radionuclide accumulation coefficient (from 0.04 to 0.82). This primarily concerns such species as Berteroa incana (L.) DC., Calamagrostis epigejos (L.) Roth, Tanacetum vulgare L., Echium vulgare L., Oenothera biennis L., Artemisia absinthium L., Verbascum lychnitis L., Melilotus albus Medik., Helichrysum arenarium (L.) Moench, Cichorium intybus L., Achillea millefolium L., Hypericum perforatum L., and Thymus serpyllum L. In the plant samples taken from the meadow and the swamp ecosystems, the 137Cs content did not exceed the permissible level (370 Bq/kg). Exceeding the normative indicator for 137Cs was detected in the forest ecosystem plant samples. Among such economically valuable plant species are Chelidonium majus L., Convallaria majalis L., Quercus robur L., Rubus idaeus L., and Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hill. In addition, the 137Cs accumulation coefficient of certain perennial species of mossy, herbaceous, and dwarf shrub layers (Pleurozium schreberi (Willd. ex Brid.) Mitt., Convallaria majalis, and Calluna vulgaris) exceeds this value for the woody plant species. The intensity of radionuclide uptake by plants is determined both by the biological characteristics of the species and by the soil and the cenotic habitat conditions. The species specificity of radiocesium accumulation by plants of specific biotopes and the direct dependence of the plant accumulation coefficient on the density of biotope contamination with radionuclides were confirmed. The conducted studies illustrated not only interspecies differences in the intensity of 137Cs accumulation in one type of local habitat, but also variations in the accumulation of radionuclides in different systematic groups and life forms
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, O.L. and N.K.; methodology, O.L.; validation, H.T.; formal analysis, O.L. and N.K.; investigation, O.L. and A.S.; resources, O.L., H.T. and N.K.; data curation, O.L. and A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, O.L. and A.S.; writing—review and editing, O.L., H.T. and N.K.; visualization, O.L.; supervision, N.K.; project administration, N.K.; funding acquisition, A.S. and H.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
| Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
