Priestia megaterium Thr45 Reduces Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilizer Inputs While Enhancing Soil Fertility and Baby Maize Yield
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. The Source of P. megaterium Thr45 and Inoculum Preparation
2.2. Experimental Design and Site Description
2.3. Soil Sampling, Fertilizer Application, and Agronomic Measurements
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Influence of P. megaterium Thr45 and Fertilizer Rates on Soil Properties
3.2. Influence of P. megaterium Thr45 and Fertilizer Ratios on Baby Maize Growth
3.3. Effect of P. megaterium Thr45 and Fertilizer Ratios on Yield Components and Yield
3.4. Impact of P. megaterium Thr45 Inoculation and Fertilizer Ratios on Nutrient Composition of Baby Corn
4. Discussion
4.1. Effects of P. megaterium Thr45 and Fertilizer Rates on Soil Properties
4.2. Effects of P. megaterium Thr45 and Urea–KCl Ratios on Baby Maize Growth
4.3. Effects of P. megaterium Thr45 and Fertilizer Ratios on Baby Corn Yield and Components
4.4. Effects of P. megaterium Thr45 and Fertilizer Ratios on Baby Corn Nutrient Components
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Galani, Y.J.H.; Ligowe, I.S.; Kieffer, M.; Kamalongo, D.; Kambwiri, A.M.; Kuwali, P.; Thierfelder, C.; Dougill, A.J.; Gong, Y.Y.; Orfila, C. Conservation Agriculture Affects Grain and Nutrient Yields of Maize (Zea Mays L.) and Can Impact Food and Nutrition Security in Sub-Saharan Africa. Front. Nutr. 2022, 8, 804663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswas, S.; Das, R.; Dutta, D. Irrigation and Primary Nutrients’ Performance on Winter Maize Productivity, Profitability, Energetics, and Carbon Footprint in Gangetic Plains of India. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 19714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khairul, A.; Delwar, A.; Cheng-Yuan, X.; Tham, H.D. Assessing Environment Impacts of Chemical Fertilizers Consumption in Australia: State-Level Evidence. Environ. Sustain. Indic. 2025, 28, 101053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhuang, L.; Wang, P.; Hu, W.; Yang, R.; Zhang, Q.; Jian, Y.; Zou, Y. A Comprehensive Study on the Impact of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction and Organic Manure Application on Soil Fertility and Apple Orchard Productivity. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yingying, X.; Xiukang, W.; Adnan, M. Exploring the link between soil health and crop productivity. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 289, 117703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xing, Y.; Xie, Y.; Wang, X. Enhancing soil health through balanced fertilization: A pathway to sustainable agriculture and food security. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 536524. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Van Chuong, N.; Tri, T.L.K.; Vu, T.M.; Tuan, L.M.; Liem, T.T.; Trang, N.N.P. Isolation and Identification of Bacillus aryabhattai M2C: Its Effects with Vermicompost on Yield and Nutrients of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Int. J. Microbiol. 2025, 10, 9923279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maciel-Rodríguez, M.; Moreno-Valencia, F.D.; Plascencia-Espinosa, M. The Role of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria in Soil Restoration: A Strategy to Promote Agricultural Sustainability. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Herrero, J.; Ramírez-Santos, A.; Díaz-Santos, E.; Torres-Cortés, G. Biofertilizers for Enhanced Nitrogen Use Efficiency: Mechanisms, Innovations, and Challenges. Nitrogen 2025, 6, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, Y.; Ren, Y.; Wang, G.; Li, J.; Zhang, H.; Yang, Y.; Pang, X.; Han, J. Microalgae and Microbial Inoculant as Partial Substitutes for Chemical Fertilizer Enhance Polygala Tenuifolia Yield and Quality by Improving Soil Microorganisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 15, 1499966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, C.V.; Tran, T.L.K. Molecular Identification and Characterization of Peribacillus simplex LT4 Isolated from the Roots of Baby Maize (Zea mays L.). Nitrogen 2026, 7, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernández-Amador, E.; Montesdeoca-Flores, D.T.; Luis-Jorge, J.C. Bacillus as Premier Biocontrol Agents: Mechanistic Insights, Strategic Application, and Future Regulatory Landscapes in Sustainable Agriculture. Plants 2026, 15, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahmed, F.; Zhang, D.; Tang, X.; Malakar, P.K. Targeting Spore-Forming Bacteria: A Review on the Antimicrobial Potential of Selenium Nanoparticles. Foods 2024, 13, 4026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chuong, N.V.; Vu, T.M.; Tuan, L.M.; Son, N.T.T.; Tri, T.L.K.; Thuan, N.V.; Dang, P.T.H.; Liem, T.T.; Trang, N.N.P. Enhanced Soil Fertility and Baby Maize Yield through Bacillus Megaterium CM2 under Reduced Nitrogen Input. Commun. Sci. Technol. 2025, 10, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Zhang, M.; Yang, W.; Wang, X.; Yang, Y.; Di, H.J.; Ma, L.; Liu, W.; Li, B. Priestia megaterium Inoculation Enhances the Stability of the Soil Bacterial Network and Promotes Cucumber Growth in a Newly Established Greenhouse. Agriculture 2026, 16, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, J.; Hu, X.; Zhang, K.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Kang, H. Unveiling the Role of Root Functional Traits in Enhancing Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Wheat Under Nitrogen Deficiency. BMC Plant Biol. 2026, 26, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kitir Sen, N.; Kocaman, A.; Aydemir, Ö.E. The Role of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction and Different Microbial Inoculants on Yield Increase in Lettuce Cultivation. BMC Plant Biol. 2025, 25, 981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, S.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, X.; Li, Q.; Li, C.; Yao, T. Effects of Microbial Inoculants Combined with Chemical Fertilizer on Growth and Soil Nutrient Dynamics of Timothy (Phleum pratense L.). Agronomy 2024, 14, 1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chuong, N.V.; Nguyen Ngoc Phuong, T.; Nguyen Van, T. Nitrogen Fertilizer Use Reduction by Two Endophytic Diazotrophic Bacteria for Soil Nutrients and Corn Yield. Commun. Sci. Technol. 2024, 9, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chuong, N.V.; Tri, T.L.K.; Liem, T.T.; Thuan, N.V.; Em, T.V.T.; Trang, N.N.P. Four Newly Identified Endophytic Bacillus megaterium Strains with Biofertilizer Potential for Enhancing Maize Growth and Productivity. Trends Sci. 2026, 23, 11347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jianfeng, D.; Qixiong, G.; Fuxin, S.; Baoyou, L.; Yang, J.; Qili, L. Agricultural Soil Microbiomes at the Climate Frontier: Nutrient-Mediated Adaptation Strategies for Sustainable Farming. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 295, 118161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wei, X.; Xie, B.; Wan, C.; Song, R.; Zhong, W.; Xin, S.; Song, K. Enhancing Soil Health and Plant Growth through Microbial Fertilizers: Mechanisms, Benefits, and Sustainable Agricultural Practices. Agronomy 2024, 14, 609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pradhan, S.; Mitra, N.G.; Sahu, R.K. Microbial Consortia Enhance Wheat Productivity, Plant Nutrition and Soil Fertility in Vertisols of Central India. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2026, 9, 1699269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abou Jaoudé, R.; Ficca, A.G.; Luziatelli, F.; Ruzzi, M. Effect of the Inoculation Method on the Potential Plant Growth-Promoting Activity of a Microbial Synthetic Consortium. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 10797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Chuong, N. The impact of Klebsiella quasipneumoniae inoculation with nitrogen fertilization on baby corn yield and cob quality. Eurasian J. Soil. Sci. 2024, 13, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miranda, A.M.; Hernandez-Tenorio, F.; Villalta, F.; Vargas, G.J.; Sáez, A.A. Advances in the Development of Biofertilizers and Biostimulants from Microalgae. Biology 2024, 13, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dai, Y.; Wu, X.; Li, S.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Hu, Y.; Liu, K.; Yang, Z.; Cai, L.; Xu, K.; et al. Optimizing Resource Management with Organic Fertilizer and Microbial Inoculants to Enhance Soil Quality, Microbial Diversity, and Crop Productivity in Newly Cultivated Land. Plants 2025, 14, 3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Chu, S.; Zhang, D.; Zhou, P.; You, Y. Improvement and Tolerance Mechanisms of Priestia Megaterium to Salt Ions. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1730703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Chuong, N.; Le Kim Tri, T. Isolation and Characterization Identification of Edophytic Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria from Peanut Nodules. Int. J. Microbiol. 2024, 8973718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, L.I.D.; Pereira, M.C.; Carvalho, A.M.X.D.; Buttrós, V.H.; Pasqual, M.; Dória, J. Phosphorus-Solubilizing Microorganisms: A Key to Sustainable Agriculture. Agriculture 2023, 13, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobua, C.K.; Wang, Y.-M.; Jou, Y.-T. Exploring the Roles of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD) in Sustainable Rice Cultivation. Soil Syst. 2025, 9, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, V.C. Influences of Enterobacter asburiae, Vermicompost Rates and Irrigation Water Types on the Soil Fertility, Peanut Yield and Quality. Curr. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2025, 25, e0260428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, G.; Zhang, L.; Wang, G.; Zheng, J.; Liang, F. Effect of Different Potassium Fertilizer Application Rates on the Yield and Potassium Utilization Efficiency of Maize in Xinjiang, China. Agronomy 2026, 16, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chieb, M.; Gachomo, E.W. The Role of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria in Plant Drought Stress Responses. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fonseca, M.d.C.d.; Bossolani, J.W.; de Oliveira, S.L.; Moretti, L.G.; Portugal, J.R.; Scudeletti, D.; de Oliveira, E.F.; Crusciol, C.A.C. Bacillus subtilis Inoculation Improves Nutrient Uptake and Physiological Activity in Sugarcane under Drought Stress. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, V.C.; Nguyen, N.P.T.; Tran, T.L.; Phan, T.H.D. Effect of Bacillus sonklengsis Associated with Cattle Manure Fertilization on the Farmland Health and Peanut Yield. Int. J. Agric. Biosci. 2025, 14, 629–636. [Google Scholar]
- Aguilar, J.V.; Lapaz, A.d.M.; Bomfim, N.C.P.; Mendes, T.F.S.; Souza, L.A.; Furlani Júnior, E.; Camargos, L.S. Photosynthetic Performance and Urea Metabolism after Foliar Fertilization with Nickel and Urea in Cotton Plants. Agriculture 2025, 15, 699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Díaz-Rodríguez, A.M.; Parra Cota, F.I.; Cira Chávez, L.A.; García Ortega, L.F.; Estrada Alvarado, M.I.; Santoyo, G.; de Los Santos-Villalobos, S. Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agriculture: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions. Plants 2025, 14, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nguyen, V.C.; Nguyen, N.P.T.; Tran, L.K.T.; Tran, T.L. Isolation and Molecular Characterization of Bacillus Megaterium ATCC 14581 and Its Effect on Nitrogen Fertilizer Use Reduction, Growth and Yield of Baby Corn. Plant Sci. Today 2026, 13, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Oliveira-Paiva, C.A.; Bini, D.; de Sousa, S.M.; Ribeiro, V.P.; Dos Santos, F.C.; de Paula Lana, U.G.; de Souza, F.F.; Gomes, E.A.; Marriel, I.E. Inoculation with Bacillus megaterium CNPMS B119 and Bacillus subtilis CNPMS B2084 improve P-acquisition and maize yield in Brazil. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1426166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amogou, O.; Noumavo, A.; Agbodjato, N.; Sina, H.; Dagbénonbakin, G.; Adoko, M.; Salako, V.; Glèlè Kakaï, R.; Adjanohoun, A.; Baba-Moussa, L. Rhizobacterial Inoculation in Combination with Mineral Fertilizer Improves Maize Growth and Yield in Poor Ferruginous Soil in Center of Benin. BioTechnologia 2021, 102, 141–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, M.; Li, Y.; Hu, Q.; Yu, X.; Huang, M.; Zhao, J.; Dong, S.; Yuan, X.; Wen, Y. Potassium Increases Nitrogen and Potassium Utilization Efficiency and Yield in Foxtail Millet. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serrapica, F.; Di Mola, I.; Cozzolino, E.; Ottaiano, L.; Sarubbi, F.; Pezzullo, G.; Di Francia, A.; Mori, M.; Masucci, F. Sustainable Maize Forage Production: Effect of Organic Amendments Combined with Microbial Biofertilizers across Different Soil Textures. Sustainability 2025, 17, 9617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, R.; Gill, R.; Chaudhary, M.; Patel, M. Effects of Integrated Nutrient Management and Fertilizers on the Yield of Baby Corn in Punjab’s Climatic Context. Plant Sci. Today 2024, 11, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fahsi, N.; Mahdi, I.; Mesfioui, A.; Biskri, L.; Allaoui, A. Phosphate Solubilizing Rhizobacteria Isolated from Jujube Ziziphus Lotus Plant Stimulate Wheat Germination Rate and Seedlings Growth. PeerJ 2021, 9, e11583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bhat, M.A.; Mishra, A.K.; Shah, S.N.; Bhat, M.A.; Jan, S.; Rahman, S.; Baek, K.-H.; Jan, A.T. Soil and Mineral Nutrients in Plant Health: A Prospective Study of Iron and Phosphorus in the Growth and Development of Plants. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 5194–5222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, W.; Sun, H.; Shao, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, J.; Long, H.; Geng, X.; Zhang, Y. Progress in the Study of Plant Nitrogen and Potassium Nutrition and Their Interaction Mechanisms. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Factors | pH | SOM (%) | TN | AP | SK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | (mg kg−1) | ||||
| P. megaterium Thr45 (A) | |||||
| No | 6.26 ± 0.194 | 1.63 ± 0.051 | 833 ± 25.2 | 11.2 ± 0.35 b | 23.3 ± 0.35 b |
| Yes | 6.33 ± 0.210 | 1.64 ± 0.055 | 835 ± 27.5 | 11.6 ± 0.38 a | 25.5 ± 0.38 a |
| Urea application, kg ha−1(B) | |||||
| 0 | 6.25 ± 0.185 | 1.61 ± 0.047 | 829 ± 24.2 | 11.3 ± 0.37 | 24.3 ± 1.13 |
| 175 | 6.27 ± 0.192 | 1.62 ± 0.049 | 834 ± 25.0 | 11.3 ± 0.37 | 24.3 ± 1.11 |
| 262.5 | 6.33 ± 0.211 | 1.64 ± 0.054 | 833 ± 27.6 | 11.5 ± 0.40 | 24.5 ± 1.13 |
| 350 | 6.34 ± 0.220 | 1.65 ± 0.056 | 838 ± 28.5 | 11.5 ± 0.44 | 24.5 ± 1.17 |
| KCl application, kg ha−1 (C) | |||||
| 0 | 6.24 ± 0.189 | 1.62 ± 0.049 | 827 ± 24.4 | 11.3 ± 0.38 | 24.3 ± 1.12 |
| 40 | 6.29 ± 0.197 | 1.63 ± 0.051 | 833 ± 25.5 | 11.4 ± 0.39 | 24.4 ± 1.12 |
| 60 | 6.32 ± 0.218 | 1.64 ± 0.057 | 837 ± 27.7 | 11.4 ± 0.42 | 24.4 ± 1.16 |
| 80 | 6.33 ± 0.209 | 1.64 ± 0.054 | 838 ± 27.1 | 11.5 ± 0.41 | 24.5 ± 1.14 |
| F (A) | ns | ns | ns | ** | ** |
| F (B) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| F (C) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| F (A × B) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| F (A × C) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| F (B × C) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| F (A × B × C) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| CV (%) | 3.24 | 3.24 | 3.15 | 3.51 | 4.61 |
| Factors | Leaf Number (Leaves) | Chlorophyll | Plant Height (cm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days After Sowing (DAS) | ||||||
| 15 | 30 | 15 | 30 | 15 | 30 | |
| P. megaterium Thr45 (A) | ||||||
| No | 5.55 ± 0.22 | 8.68 ± 0.83 b | 40.5 ± 1.85 b | 47.9 ± 2.37 b | 41.8 ± 3.27 b | 74.4 ± 7.67 b |
| Yes | 5.56 ± 0.12 | 9.12 ± 0.37 a | 41.5 ± 0.87 a | 51.1 ± 1.35 a | 45.8 ± 1.73 a | 81.3 ± 4.51 a |
| Urea application, kg ha−1(B) | ||||||
| 0 | 5.49 ± 0.19 b | 8.23 ± 0.71 b | 40.0 ± 1.66 b | 47.3 ± 2.77 b | 41.7 ± 2.75 c | 72.0 ± 7.95 b |
| 175 | 5.54 ± 0.15 ab | 8.97 ± 0.52 a | 40.4 ± 1.15 b | 49.8 ± 2.21 a | 43.7 ± 3.40 b | 78.4 ± 6.52 a |
| 262.5 | 5.60 ± 0.15 a | 9.18 ± 0.51 a | 41.7 ± 1.17 a | 50.2 ± 1.80 a | 44.4 ± 3.33 ab | 80.4 ± 4.74 a |
| 350 | 5.61 ± 0.20 a | 9.20 ± 0.48 a | 41.9 ± 1.17 a | 50.6 ± 1.81 a | 45.5 ± 2.38 a | 80.6 ± 5.71 a |
| KCl application, kg ha−1 (C) | ||||||
| 0 | 5.49 ± 0.19 b | 8.40 ± 0.67 b | 40.4 ± 1.94 b | 48.8 ± 3.14 b | 41.4 ± 3.17 c | 71.4 ± 7.11 c |
| 40 | 5.56 ± 0.15 ab | 8.58 ± 0.54 b | 40.7 ± 1.26 b | 49.0 ± 2.18 ab | 43.4 ± 2.57 b | 75.5 ± 5.59 b |
| 60 | 5.59 ± 0.16 a | 9.30 ± 0.42 a | 41.0 ± 1.33 b | 49.9 ± 2.27 ab | 45.2 ± 3.14 a | 82.0 ± 4.56 a |
| 80 | 5.61 ± 0.19 a | 9.33 ± 0.48 a | 41.8 ± 1.20 a | 50.2 ± 2.51 a | 45.3 ± 2.59 a | 82.6 ± 4.30 a |
| F (A) | ns | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| F (B) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| F (C) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| F (A × B) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| F (A × C) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| F (B × C) | ns | * | ns | ** | ** | * |
| F (A × B × C) | ns | ** | ns | ** | ** | ** |
| CV (%) | 3.19 | 7.59 | 3.15 | 5.08 | 7.46 | 9.22 |
| Factors | Ear Number | Ear Yield | Edible Cob Yield | Plant Biomass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Ears Plant−1) | (t ha−1) | |||
| P. megaterium Thr45 (A) | ||||
| No | 1.98 ± 0.181 b | 7.73 ± 1.09 b | 2.29 ± 0.328 b | 30.8 ± 2.81 b |
| Yes | 2.14 ± 0.112 a | 7.93 ± 0.784 a | 2.41 ± 0.231 a | 31.6 ± 1.95 a |
| Urea application, kg ha−1 (B) | ||||
| 0 | 1.91 ± 0.201 b | 6.84 ± 0.856 b | 2.05 ± 0.269 b | 27.4 ± 1.37 c |
| 175 | 2.10 ± 0.132 a | 8.12 ± 0.765 a | 2.44 ± 0.227 a | 32.2 ± 0.985 b |
| 262.5 | 2.11 ± 0.130 a | 8.17 ± 0.731 a | 2.45 ± 0.223 a | 32.3 ± 0.909 b |
| 350 | 2.12 ± 0.108 a | 8.19 ± 0.715 a | 2.46 ± 0.218 a | 32.9 ± 0.854 a |
| KCl application, kg ha−1 (C) | ||||
| 0 | 1.92 ± 0.184 c | 6.78 ± 0.706 c | 2.04 ± 0.231 c | 30.8 ± 2.83 b |
| 40 | 2.00 ± 0.152 b | 7.58 ± 0.644 b | 2.27 ± 0.202 b | 31.1 ± 2.49 a |
| 60 | 2.15 ± 0.087 a | 8.46 ± 0.579 a | 2.54 ± 0.180 a | 31.2 ± 2.33 a |
| 80 | 2.16 ± 0.103 a | 8.51 ± 0.604 a | 2.55 ± 0.180 a | 31.8 ± 2.09 a |
| F (A) | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| F (B) | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| F (C) | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| F (A × B) | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| F (A × C) | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| F (B × C) | ** | ns | ns | ** |
| F (A × B × C) | * | ** | ** | * |
| CV (%) | 8.26 | 12.2 | 12.3 | 7.84 |
| Factor | Moisture | Lipide | Protein | N | P | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | ||||||
| P. megaterium Thr45 (A) | ||||||
| No | 86.8 ± 1.31 | 0.371 ± 0.016 b | 2.28 ± 0.300 b | 0.364 ± 0.048 b | 0.160 ± 0.027 b | 0.267 ± 0.020 b |
| Yes | 86.9 ± 1.48 | 0.373 ± 0.016 a | 2.62 ± 0.144 a | 0.419 ± 0.023 a | 0.173 ± 0.012 a | 0.295 ± 0.008 a |
| Urea application, kg ha−1 (B) | ||||||
| 0 | 87.0 ± 1.55 | 0.365 ± 0.018 b | 2.20 ± 0.315 c | 0.352 ± 0.050 c | 0.146 ± 0.021 b | 0.267 ± 0.026 b |
| 175 | 87.3 ± 1.49 | 0.373 ± 0.016 ab | 2.44 ± 0.250 b | 0.390 ± 0.040 b | 0.172 ± 0.018 a | 0.283 ± 0.018 a |
| 262.5 | 86.8 ± 1.55 | 0.374 ± 0.014 a | 2.57 ± 0.221 a | 0.411 ± 0.035 a | 0.173 ± 0.019 a | 0.285 ± 0.017 a |
| 350 | 86.4 ± 1.20 | 0.376 ± 0.015 a | 2.59 ± 0.181 a | 0.415 ± 0.029 a | 0.174 ± 0.016 a | 0.287 ± 0.014 a |
| KCl application, kg ha−1 (C) | ||||||
| 0 | 86.8 ± 1.34 | 0.351 ± 0.008 d | 2.21 ± 0.327 b | 0.354 ± 0.052 b | 0.144 ± 0.020 b | 0.266 ± 0.024 b |
| 50 | 86.8 ± 1.47 | 0.370 ± 0.008 c | 2.50 ± 0.242 a | 0.400 ± 0.039 a | 0.172 ± 0.017 a | 0.279 ± 0.019 a |
| 75 | 86.8 ± 1.45 | 0.379 ± 0.008 b | 2.53 ± 0.247 a | 0.406 ± 0.039 b | 0.173 ± 0.018 a | 0.288 ± 0.017 a |
| 100 | 87.2 ± 1.68 | 0.389 ± 0.008 a | 2.55 ± 0.204 a | 0.408 ± 0.034 a | 0.175 ± 0.016 a | 0.289 ± 0.015 a |
| F (A) | ns | * | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| F (B) | ns | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| F (C) | ns | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| F (A × B) | ns | ns | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| F (A × C) | ns | ns | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| F (B × C) | ns | ns | ns | ns | * | ns |
| F (A × B × C) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ** | ns |
| CV (%) | 1.70 | 4.34 | 11.9 | 7.59 | 9.22 | 7.38 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Dang, P.T.H.; Chuong, N.V. Priestia megaterium Thr45 Reduces Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilizer Inputs While Enhancing Soil Fertility and Baby Maize Yield. Nitrogen 2026, 7, 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/nitrogen7010032
Dang PTH, Chuong NV. Priestia megaterium Thr45 Reduces Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilizer Inputs While Enhancing Soil Fertility and Baby Maize Yield. Nitrogen. 2026; 7(1):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/nitrogen7010032
Chicago/Turabian StyleDang, Phan Tran Hai, and Nguyen Van Chuong. 2026. "Priestia megaterium Thr45 Reduces Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilizer Inputs While Enhancing Soil Fertility and Baby Maize Yield" Nitrogen 7, no. 1: 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/nitrogen7010032
APA StyleDang, P. T. H., & Chuong, N. V. (2026). Priestia megaterium Thr45 Reduces Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilizer Inputs While Enhancing Soil Fertility and Baby Maize Yield. Nitrogen, 7(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/nitrogen7010032

