Next Article in Journal
Solving the Fractional Allen–Cahn Equation and the Fractional Cahn–Hilliard Equation with the Fractional Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Previous Article in Journal
Fractional Mean-Square Inequalities for (P, m)-Superquadratic Stochastic Processes and Their Applications to Stochastic Divergence Measures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Donsker-Type Construction for the Self-Stabilizing and Self-Scaling Process
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Fractional Time-Varying Autoregressive Modeling: Parallel GAM and PINN Approaches to Dynamic Volatility Forecasting

1
School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
2
Center for Financial Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fractal Fract. 2025, 9(12), 772; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9120772
Submission received: 20 October 2025 / Revised: 13 November 2025 / Accepted: 24 November 2025 / Published: 26 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fractional Processes and Systems in Computer Science and Engineering)

Abstract

Time-series modeling plays a crucial role in analyzing and forecasting financial volatility. Classical approaches, such as the Autoregressive (AR) and Fractional Autoregressive (FAR) models, capture short-term linear dependencies and long-range correlations, respectively, but their reliance on fixed structures and stationarity assumptions limits their adaptability to evolving market dynamics. To overcome these limitations, this study introduces a Fractional Time-Varying Autoregressive (FTVAR) framework that allows model parameters to evolve smoothly over time, integrating long-memory effects with nonstationary behavior. The FTVAR process is examined through two complementary methods: a Generalized Additive Model (GAM) for interpretable estimation of time-varying coefficients, and a Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) that embeds system dynamics to enhance forecasting under complex conditions. Simulation studies demonstrate that the FTVAR model consistently outperforms conventional AR approaches, offering superior forecasting accuracy, robustness to nonstationarity, and a more comprehensive representation of evolving volatility structures. Empirical analyses on the S&P 500 and VIX indices further confirm the effectiveness and practical relevance of the proposed framework.
Keywords: financial volatility analysis; fractional time-varying autoregressive (FTVAR); physics-informed neural network (PINN); generalized additive model (GAM) financial volatility analysis; fractional time-varying autoregressive (FTVAR); physics-informed neural network (PINN); generalized additive model (GAM)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jia, Z.; Rao, N. Fractional Time-Varying Autoregressive Modeling: Parallel GAM and PINN Approaches to Dynamic Volatility Forecasting. Fractal Fract. 2025, 9, 772. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9120772

AMA Style

Jia Z, Rao N. Fractional Time-Varying Autoregressive Modeling: Parallel GAM and PINN Approaches to Dynamic Volatility Forecasting. Fractal and Fractional. 2025; 9(12):772. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9120772

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jia, Zhixuan, and Nan Rao. 2025. "Fractional Time-Varying Autoregressive Modeling: Parallel GAM and PINN Approaches to Dynamic Volatility Forecasting" Fractal and Fractional 9, no. 12: 772. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9120772

APA Style

Jia, Z., & Rao, N. (2025). Fractional Time-Varying Autoregressive Modeling: Parallel GAM and PINN Approaches to Dynamic Volatility Forecasting. Fractal and Fractional, 9(12), 772. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9120772

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop