Next Article in Journal
Numerical Analysis and Computation of the Finite Volume Element Method for the Nonlinear Coupled Time-Fractional Schrödinger Equations
Previous Article in Journal
Valuation of Currency Option Based on Uncertain Fractional Differential Equation
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Generalized Jacobi Polynomial Galerkin Operational Matrices of Derivatives: An Algorithm for Solving Boundary Value Problems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Stationary Responses of Seven Classes of Fractional Vibrations Driven by Sinusoidal Force

1
Ocean College, Zhejiang University, Zhoushan 316021, China
2
School of Communication and Electronic Engineering, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
Fractal Fract. 2024, 8(8), 479; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8080479
Submission received: 26 May 2024 / Revised: 30 July 2024 / Accepted: 10 August 2024 / Published: 16 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers for Numerical and Computational Methods Section)

Abstract

This paper gives the contributions in three folds. First, we propose fractional phasor motion equations of seven classes of fractional vibrators. Second, we put forward fractional phasor responses to seven classes of fractional vibrators. Third, we bring forward the analytical expressions of stationary responses in time to seven classes of fractional vibration systems driven by sinusoidal force using elementary functions. The present results show that there are obvious effects of fractional orders on the sinusoidal stationary responses to fractional vibrations.

1. Introduction

For a vibration system with the primary mass m, primary damping c, and primary stiffness k, its motion equation is a differential equation in the form
{ m d 2 x ( t ) d t 2 + c d x ( t ) d t + k x ( t ) = f ( t ) , x ( 0 ) = x 0 , x ( 0 ) = v 0 ,
where f(t) is driven force, x(t) is response, x0 and v0 are initial conditions. To find response x(t) is to find the solution to the above differential equation.
In vibration engineering, a type of specific forced response x(t) when f(t) = F0sin(ωt + θ) for large t is essential. Such a response is called sinusoidal stationary response or stationary sinusoidal response. In engineering, a sinusoidal stationary response may be solved with an algebraic method called phasor instead of those for a differential equation. The theory of phasor, introduced by Steinmetz originally for its use in electrical engineering (Steinmetz, [1,2,3], Desoer and Kuh [4], Qiu [5]), has been now a widely used tool for dealing with stationary responses to sinusoidal vibrations in vibrations (see e.g., Den Hartog [6], Nakagawa and Ringo [7], Palley et al. [8], Grote and Antonsson [9], Allemang and Avitabile [10], Soong and Grigoriu [11], Rothbart and Brown [12], Jin and Xia [13], Harris [14], and Li [15], just mentioning a few).
Fractional vibrations gain increasing interests of researchers (see e.g., Rossikhin and Shitikova [16,17,18,19], Rossikhin [20], Shitikova [21,22], Uchaikin [23], Pskhu and Rekhviashvili [24], Zelenev et al. [25], Freundlich [26,27], Zurigat [28], Blaszczyk [29], Blaszczyk et al. [30], Blaszczyk and Ciesielski [31], Al-Rabtah et al. [32], Drozdov [33], Stanislavsky [34], Tofighi [35], Ryabov and Puzenko [36], Achar et al. [37,38,39], Xu et al. [40], Shitikova et al. [41], Askarian et al. [42], and Li [43,44], simply citing a few). A motion equation of a fractional vibrator is a fractional differential equation. Usually, responses of a fractional vibrator are dealt with a special function called the Mittag–Leffler function. Reports with respect to responses to a fractional vibrator using elementary functions are rarely seen.
Recently, Li introduced analytical expressions of responses (free, impulse, step) of six classes (classes I–VI in this paper) of fractional vibrators using elementary functions (Li [15]) and analytical expressions of sinusoidal responses of three classes (classes I-III in this paper) of fractional vibrators (Li [43]). However, he did not study sinusoidal stationary responses using phasor, which is an algebraic method. In the field, reports regarding motion phasor equations or sinusoidal stationary responses to fractional vibrations using fractional phasor are seldom seen. This paper aims at presenting analytical expressions of sinusoidal stationary responses of seven classes of fractional vibrators listed in Table 1. The novelty and originality of the present results are in three folds. First, we establish the fractional phasor motion equations of seven classes of fractional vibrators. Second, we establish the expressions of fractional phasor responses to seven classes of fractional vibrators. Third, we propose the sinusoidal stationary responses to seven classes of fractional vibrators only using elementary functions.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. The fractional phasor is described in Section 2. Fractional phasor equations of motions, fractional phasor responses, and stationary sinusoidal responses of classes I–VII fractional vibration systems are proposed in Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, Section 6, Section 7, Section 8 and Section 9, respectively. Discussions are in Section 10. Conclusions are given in Section 11.

2. Fractional Phasor

In this research, we use the fractional derivative of Weyl’s, referring [45,46,47,48,49,50] and Appendix A for the Weyl fractional derivative.
When writing f(t) = F0sin(ωt + θ) by
f(t) = Im{F0exp[i(ωt + θ)]},
we denote the phasor of f(t) by F. It is given by
F = F0exp().
Using F, we write
f(t) = Im[Fexp(iωt)].
Lemma 1.
Suppose that y(t) = Y0sin(ωt + θ). Let Y be the phasor of y(t). It is in the form of Y = Y0exp(). Then, the phasor of y(v)(t) (v ≥ 0) is given by ()vY.
Proof. 
Since y(v)(t) = Im{()vY0exp[i(ωt + θ)]} = Im[()vYexp(iωt)], the phasor of y(v)(t) is ()vY. The proof is finished. □
Theorem 1.
The phasor of y(v)(t) can be expressed by
( i ω ) v Y = ( ω v cos v π 2 + i ω v sin v π 2 ) Y .
Proof. 
Considering the principal branch of iv, the above holds. This finishes the proof. □

3. Results Regarding Fractional Vibrators of Class I

3.1. Motion Phasor Equation of Class I Fractional Vibrator

Theorem 2.
The motion phasor equation of a class I fractional vibrator is expressed by
m()αX1 + kX1 = F,
where X1 is the phasor of response x1(t) and F is the phasor of excitation f(t) = F0sin(ωt + θ).
Proof. 
Expressing both sides of m d α x 1 ( t ) d t α + k x 1 ( t ) = f ( t ) using phasor yields (5). The proof is finished. □
Considering Theorem 1, the left side of (5) can be expressed by
m ( i ω ) α X 1 + k X 1 = ( m ω α cos α π 2 + i m ω α sin α π 2 + k ) X 1 .
When writing the right side of the above by
( m ω α cos α π 2 + i m ω α sin α π 2 + k ) X 1 = [ ( i ω ) 2 ( 1 ) m ω α 2 cos α π 2 + ( i ω ) m ω α 1 sin α π 2 + k ] X 1 ,
we express the motion phasor equation of a class I fractional vibrator by
m ( i ω ) α X 1 + k X 1 = [ ( i ω ) 2 ( 1 ) m ω α 2 cos α π 2 + ( i ω ) m ω α 1 sin α π 2 + k ] X 1 .
Denote by meq1 the equivalent mass for a fractional vibrator of class I. Then, from (6),
m eq 1 = m ω α 2 cos α π 2 , 1 < α < 3 .
Let ceq1 be the equivalent damping for a fractional vibrator of class I. Then, from (6),
c eq 1 = m ω α 1 sin α π 2 , 1 < α < 3 .
Therefore, the motion phasor equation in Theorem 2 is expressed by
m ( i ω ) α X 1 + k X 1 = ( i ω ) 2 m eq 1 X 1 + i ω c eq 1 X 1 + k X 1 = F .
Denote by ζeq1 the equivalent damping ratio for a fractional vibrator of class I. Define it by
ς eq 1 = c eq 1 2 m eq 1 k .
Then,
ς eq 1 = ω α 2 sin α π 2 2 ω n cos α π 2 ,
where ω n = k m is the conventional natural angular frequency with damping free.
Now, we introduce a term of equivalent damping free natural angular frequency. Let it be ωeqn1. Define it by
ω eqn 1 = k m eq 1 .
Then,
ω eqn 1 = ω n ω α 2 cos α π 2 , 1 < α < 3 .
Without losing the generality, we restrict | ς eq 1 | 1 in what follows. Let ωeqd1 be the equivalent damped natural angular frequency for a fractional vibrator of class I. Then,
ω eqd 1 = ω eqn 1 1 ς eq 1 2 , | ς eq 1 | 1 .
Equation (16) can be written by
ω eqd 1 = ω n ω α 2 cos α π 2 1 ω α sin 2 α π 2 4 ω n 2 | cos α π 2 | .
Using the notations of meq1, ceq1, ζeq1, ωeqn1, and ωeqd1, we write the motion phasor equation in Theorem 2 by
( i ω ) 2 X 1 + i 2 ζ eqn 1 ω eqn 1 X 1 + ω eqn 1 2 X 1 = F m eq 1 .

3.2. Frequency Transfer Function of Class I Fractional Vibrator

Let γeq1 be the equivalent frequency ratio of a fractional vibrator of class I. Define it by
γ eq 1 = ω ω eqn 1 .
Then,
γ eq 1 = ω ω α 2 | cos α π 2 | ω n .
When writing (7) by
( i ω ) α X 1 + ω n 2 X 1 = ( ω α cos α π 2 + i ω α sin α π 2 + ω n 2 ) X 1 = F m ,
we have the frequency transfer function in phasor, denoted by H1(ω), in the form
H 1 ( ω ) = X 1 F = 1 k ( 1 ω α ω n 2 | cos α π 2 | + i ω α ω n 2 sin α π 2 ) .
Using γeq1 and ζeq1, the above can be rewritten by
H 1 ( ω ) = 1 k ( 1 γ eq 1 2 + i 2 ς eq 1 γ eq 1 ) .
The amplitude of H1(ω) is given by
| H 1 ( ω ) | = 1 / k ( 1 ω α ω n 2 | cos α π 2 | ) 2 + ( ω α ω n 2 sin α π 2 ) 2
or
| H 1 ( ω ) | = 1 / k ( 1 γ eq 1 2 ) 2 + ( 2 ς eq 1 γ eq 1 ) 2 .
The phase of H1(ω) is in the form
φ 1 ( ω ) = tan 1 ω α sin α π 2 ω n 2 ω α | cos α π 2 |
or
φ 1 = cos 1 1 γ eq 1 2 ( 1 γ eq 1 2 ) 2 + ( 2 ς eq 1 γ eq 1 ) 2 ,
or
φ 1 ( ω ) = cos 1 1 ( ω ω eqn 1 ) 2 [ 1 ( ω ω eqn 1 ) 2 ] 2 + ( 2 ς eq 1 ω ω eqn 1 ) 2 .

3.3. Stationary Response to Sinusoidal Vibration of Class I Fractional Vibrator

Theorem 3.
The response phasor of a class I fractional vibrator is expressed by
X 1 = F k ( 1 ω α ω n 2 | cos α π 2 | + i ω α ω n 2 sin α π 2 ) .
Proof. 
According to (22), we have
X 1 = H 1 ( ω ) F = F k ( 1 ω α ω n 2 | cos α π 2 | + i ω α ω n 2 sin α π 2 ) .
The proof is finished. □
Equation (29) can be in the form
X 1 = F k ( 1 γ eq 1 2 + i 2 ς eq 1 γ eq 1 ) .
Theorem 4.
The stationary sinusoidal response to a class I fractional vibrator is expressed by
x 1 ( t ) = F 0 / k ( 1 ω α ω n 2 | cos α π 2 | ) 2 + ( ω α ω n 2 sin α π 2 ) 2 sin { ω t + θ cos 1 1 ( ω ω eqn 1 ) 2 [ 1 ( ω ω eqn 1 ) 2 ] 2 + ( 2 ς eq 1 ω ω eqn 1 ) 2 } .
Proof. 
Note that x1(t) = Im[X1exp(iωt)]. As X1 = H1(ω)F = H1(ω)F0exp(), we have the above. The proof is finished. □
When ω = 2, F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, k = 1, we use Figure 1 to illustrate x1(t) for α = 1.2, 2, and 2.5. It exhibits that the effect of fractional order α on x1(t) is considerable.

4. Results in Fractional Vibrators of Class II

4.1. Motion Phasor Equation of Class II Fractional Vibrator

Theorem 5.
Let X2 be the phasor of response x2(t) of a class II fractional vibrator. Let F be the phasor of excitation f(t) = F0sin(ωt + θ). Then, the motion phasor equation of a class II fractional vibrator is expressed by
m()2X2 + c()βX2 + kX2 = F.
Proof. 
Using phasor to express both sides of m d 2 x 2 ( t ) d t 2 + c d β x 2 ( t ) d t β + k x 2 ( t ) = f ( t ) produces (32). This completes the proof. □
Considering the principal branch of iβ, we write the left side of (32) by
m ( i ω ) 2 X 2 + c ( i ω ) β X 2 + k X 2 = ( m ω 2 + c ω β cos β π 2 + i c ω β sin β π 2 + k ) X 2 .
Writing the right side of the above by
( m ω 2 + c ω β cos β π 2 + i c ω β sin β π 2 + k ) X 2 = [ m ω 2 + c ω β cos β π 2 + ( i ω ) c ω β 1 sin β π 2 + k ] X 2
yields the motion phasor equation of a class II fractional vibrator in the form
m ( i ω ) 2 X 2 + c ( i ω ) β X 2 + k X 2 = [ ( m c ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) ( i ω ) 2 + ( i ω ) c ω β 1 sin β π 2 + k ] X 2 .
Let meq2 be the equivalent mass for a fractional vibrator of class II. Then, from (35),
m eq 2 = m c ω β 2 cos β π 2 ,   0 < β < 2 .
Let ceq2 be the equivalent damping for a fractional vibrator of class II. Then, from (35),
c eq 2 = c ω β 1 sin β π 2 ,   0 < β < 2 .
Therefore, we can write the motion phasor equation in Theorem 5 by
m ( i ω ) 2 X 2 + c ( i ω ) β X 2 + k X 2 = ( i ω ) 2 m eq 2 X 2 + i ω c eq 2 X 2 + k X 2 = F .
Let ζeq2 be the equivalent damping ratio for a fractional vibrator of class II. Define it by
ς eq 2 = c eq 2 2 m eq 2 k .
Then,
ς eq 2 = ς ω β 1 sin β π 2 1 c m ω β 2 cos β π 2 ,
where ς = c 2 m k .
Let ωeqn2 be the equivalent damping free natural angular frequency of a class II fractional vibrator. Define it by
ω eqn 2 = k m eq 2 .
Then,
ω eqn 2 = ω n 1 c m ω β 2 cos β π 2 .
Considering practical vibrations, we adopt | ς eq 2 | 1 in what follows. Let ωeqd2 be the equivalent damped natural angular frequency for a fractional vibrator of class II. Then,
ω eqd 2 = ω eqn 2 1 ς eq 2 2 .
The above implies
ω eqd 2 = ω n 1 c m ω β 2 cos β π 2 1 ς 2 ω 2 ( β 1 ) s i n 2 β π 2 1 c m ω β 2 cos β π 2 .
Adopting the notations of meq2, ceq2, ζeq2, and ωeqn2, we write the motion phasor equation in Theorem 5 by
( i ω ) 2 X 2 + i 2 ζ eqn 2 ω eqn 2 X 2 + ω eqn 2 2 X 2 = F m eq 2 .

4.2. Frequency Transfer Function of Class II Fractional Vibrator

Denote by γeq2 the equivalent frequency ratio of a fractional vibrator of class II. It is defined by
γ eq 2 = ω ω eqn 2 .
Then,
γ eq 2 = γ 1 c m ω β 2 cos β π 2 .
Rewrite (45) by
[ ( i ω ) 2 + i 2 ζ eqn 2 ω eqn 2 + ω eqn 2 2 ] X 2 = F m eq 2 .
Let H2(ω) be the frequency transfer function in phasor for a class II fractional vibrator. Then,
H 2 ( ω ) = 1 / k 1 γ 2 ( 1 c m ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) + i 2 ς ω β sin β π 2 ω n .
By using γeq2 and ζeq2, the above can be rewritten by
H 2 ( ω ) = 1 k ( 1 γ eq 2 2 + i 2 ς eq 2 γ eq 2 ) .
The amplitude of H2(ω) is
| H 2 ( ω ) | = 1 / k [ 1 γ 2 ( 1 c m ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) ] 2 + ( 1 ω n 2 ς ω β sin β π 2 ) 2 ,
which equals to
| H 2 ( ω ) | = 1 / k ( 1 γ eq 2 2 ) 2 + ( 2 ς eq 2 γ eq 2 ) 2 .
The phase of H2(ω) is given by
φ 2 ( ω ) = cos 1 1 γ eq 2 2 ( 1 γ eq 2 2 ) 2 + ( 2 ς eq 2 γ eq 2 ) 2 .
Equivalently,
φ 2 ( ω ) = cos 1 1 ( ω ω eqn 2 ) 2 [ 1 ( ω ω eqn 2 ) 2 ] 2 + ( 2 ς eq 2 ω ω eqn 2 ) 2 .

4.3. Stationary Response to Sinusoidal Vibration of Class II Fractional Vibrator

Theorem 6.
The response phasor of a class II fractional vibrator is given by
X 2 = F / k 1 γ 2 ( 1 c m ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) + i 2 ς ω β sin β π 2 ω n .
Proof. 
Since X2 = H2(ω)F, according to (49), we see that the above holds. The proof is finished. □
Equation (55) is equivalently given by
X 2 = F k ( 1 γ eq 2 2 + i 2 ς eq 2 γ eq 2 ) .
Theorem 7.
The stationary sinusoidal response to a class II fractional vibrator is given by
x 2 ( t ) = F 0 / k [ 1 γ 2 ( 1 c m ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) ] 2 + ( 1 ω n 2 ς ω β sin β π 2 ) 2 sin { ω t + θ cos 1 1 ( ω ω eqn 2 ) 2 [ 1 ( ω ω eqn 2 ) 2 ] 2 + ( 2 ς eq 2 ω ω eqn 2 ) 2 } .
Proof. 
Because x2(t) = Im[X2exp(iωt)], X2 = H2(ω)F, and F = F0exp(), we have x2(t) = Im[H2(ω)F0exp()exp(iωt)] = Im{|H2(ω)|F0exp(iωt)exp()exp[−(ω)]}. Thus, the above holds. The proof is finished. □
Some plots of x2(t) for β = 0.4, 1, and 1.5 when ω = 2, F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, and k = 1, are indicated in Figure 2, which illustrates that there is significant effect of fractional order β on x2(t).

5. Results in Class III Fractional Vibrators

5.1. Motion Phasor Equation of Class III Fractional Vibrator

Theorem 8.
Denote by X3 the phasor of response x3(t) of a class III fractional vibrator. Let F be the phasor of excitation f(t) = F0sin(ωt + θ). Then, the motion phasor equation of a class III fractional vibrator is expressed by
m()αX3 + c()βX3 + kX3 = F.
Proof. 
Using phasor to express both sides of m d α x 3 ( t ) d t α + c d β x 3 ( t ) d t β + k x 3 ( t ) = f ( t ) yields (58). This completes the proof. □
Considering the principal branches of iα and iβ, we express the left side of (58) by
m ( i ω ) α X 3 + c ( i ω ) β X 3 + k X 3 = [ m ( i ω ) α + c ( i ω ) β + k ] X 3 ( m ω α cos α π 2 + i m ω α sin α π 2 + c ω β cos β π 2 + i c ω β sin β π 2 + k ) X 3 = [ m ω α cos α π 2 + c ω β cos β π 2 + i ( m ω α sin α π 2 + c ω β sin β π 2 ) + k ] X 3 .
The right side of the above can be written by
[ m ω α cos α π 2 + c ω β cos β π 2 + i ( m ω α sin α π 2 + c ω β sin β π 2 ) + k ] X 3 = [ ( m ω α 2 cos α π 2 + c ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) ( i ω ) 2 + ( m ω α 1 sin α π 2 + c ω β 1 sin β π 2 ) ( i ω ) + k ] X 3 .
Therefore,
[ m ( i ω ) α + c ( i ω ) β + k ] X 3 = [ ( m ω α 2 cos α π 2 + c ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) ( i ω ) 2 + ( m ω α 1 sin α π 2 + c ω β 1 sin β π 2 ) ( i ω ) + k ] X 3 .
Let meq3 be the equivalent mass for a class III fractional vibrator. Then, from (61),
m eq 3 = ( m ω α 2 cos α π 2 + c ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) .
Let ceq3 be the equivalent damping of a class III fractional vibrator. Then, from (61),
c eq 3 = m ω α 1 sin α π 2 + c ω β 1 sin β π 2 .
Therefore, we can write the motion phasor equation in Theorem 8 by
[ m ( i ω ) α + c ( i ω ) β + k ] X 3 = [ ( i ω ) 2 m eq 3 + i ω c eq 3 + k ] X 3 = F .
Let ζeq3 be the equivalent damping ratio for a fractional vibrator of class III. It is defined by
ς eq 3 = c eq 3 2 m eq 3 k .
Then,
ς eq 3 = ω α 1 sin α π 2 + 2 ς ω n ω β 1 sin β π 2 2 ω n ( ω α 2 cos α π 2 + 2 ς ω n ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) .
Denote by ωeqn3 the equivalent damping free natural angular frequency of a class III fractional vibrator. It is defined by
ω eqn 3 = k m eq 3 .
Then,
ω eqn 3 = ω n ( ω α 2 cos α π 2 + c m ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) .
From a practice view, we adopt | ς eq 3 | 1 in what follows. Denote by ωeqd3 the equivalent damped natural angular frequency for a fractional vibrator of class III. Then,
ω eqd 3 = ω eqn 3 1 ς eq 3 2 .
Thus,
ω eqd 3 = ω n 1 [ ( ω α 1 sin α π 2 + 2 ς ω n ω β 1 s i n β π 2 ) 2 4 ω n 2 [ ( ω α 2 cos α π 2 + 2 ς ω n ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) ] ] 2 ( ω α 2 cos α π 2 + c m ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) .
When using the notations of meq3, ceq3, ζeq3, ωeqn3, and ωeqd3, we write the motion phasor equation of a class III fractional vibrator by
( i ω ) 2 X 3 + i 2 ζ eqn 3 ω eqn 3 X 3 + ω eqn 3 2 X 3 = F m eq 3 .

5.2. Frequency Transfer Function of Class III Fractional Vibrator

Let γeq3 be the equivalent frequency ratio of a fractional vibrator of class III. Define it by
γ eq 3 = ω ω eqn 3 .
Then,
γ eq 3 = γ ( ω α 2 cos α π 2 + c m ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) .
Let H3(ω) be the frequency transfer function in phasor for a class III fractional vibrator. Then,
H 3 ( ω ) = 1 / k 1 γ 2 ( ω α 2 | cos α π 2 | 2 ς ω n ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) + i γ ( ω α 1 sin α π 2 + 2 ς ω n ω β 1 sin β π 2 ) ω n ( ω α 2 | cos α π 2 | 2 ς ω n ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) .
Using γeq3 and ζeq3, the above can be rewritten by
H 3 ( ω ) = 1 k ( 1 γ eq 3 2 + i 2 ς eq 3 γ eq 3 ) .
The amplitude of H3(ω) is in the form
| H 3 ( ω ) | = 1 / k { [ 1 γ 2 ( ω α 2 | cos α π 2 | 2 ς ω n ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) ] 2 + [ γ ( ω α 1 sin α π 2 + 2 ς ω n ω β 1 s i n β π 2 ) ω n ( ω α 2 | cos α π 2 | 2 ς ω n ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) ] 2 } .
which is equivalent to
| H 3 ( ω ) | = 1 / k ( 1 γ eq 3 2 ) 2 + ( 2 ς eq 3 γ eq 3 ) 2 .
The phase of H3(ω) is given by
φ 3 ( ω ) = cos 1 1 γ eq 3 2 ( 1 γ eq 3 2 ) 2 + ( 2 ς eq 3 γ eq 3 ) 2 .
Equivalently,
φ 3 ( ω ) = cos 1 1 ( ω ω eqn 3 ) 2 [ 1 ( ω ω eqn 3 ) 2 ] 2 + ( 2 ς eq 3 ω ω eqn 3 ) 2 .

5.3. Stationary Response to Sinusoidal Vibration of Class III Fractional Vibrator

Theorem 9.
The response phasor of a class III fractional vibrator is expressed by
X 3 = F / k 1 γ 2 ( ω α 2 | cos α π 2 | 2 ς ω n ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) + i γ ( ω α 1 sin α π 2 + 2 ς ω n ω β 1 sin β π 2 ) ω n ( ω α 2 | cos α π 2 | 2 ς ω n ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) .
Proof. 
As X3 = H3(ω)F, according to (74), we have the above. The proof is finished. □
Equation (80) is equivalently to
X 3 = F k ( 1 γ eq 3 2 + i 2 ς eq 3 γ eq 3 ) .
Theorem 10.
The stationary sinusoidal response to a class III fractional vibrator is expressed by
x 3 ( t ) = F 0 / k { [ 1 γ 2 ( ω α 2 | cos α π 2 | 2 ς ω n ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) ] 2 + [ γ ( ω α 1 sin α π 2 + 2 ς ω n ω β 1 sin β π 2 ) ω n ( ω α 2 | cos α π 2 | 2 ς ω n ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) ] 2 } sin { ω t + θ cos 1 1 ( ω ω eqn 3 ) 2 [ 1 ( ω ω eqn 3 ) 2 ] 2 + ( 2 ς eq 3 ω ω eqn 3 ) 2 } .
Proof. 
Since x3(t) = Im[X3exp(iωt)], X3 = H3(ω)F, and F = F0exp(), we have x3(t) = Im{|H3(ω)|F0exp(iωt)exp()exp[−(ω)]}. Therefore, the above is valid. The proof is finished. □
Figure 3 indicates some plots of x3(t) for different values of α and β when ω = 2, F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, and k = 1. That shows the considerable effect of α and β on the response x3(t).

6. Results about Class IV Fractional Vibrators

6.1. Motion Phasor Equation of Class IV Fractional Vibrator

Theorem 11.
Let X4 be the phasor of response x4(t) of a class IV fractional vibrator. Denote by F the phasor of excitation f(t) = F0sin(ωt + θ). Then, the motion phasor equation of a class IV fractional vibrator is in the form
m()αX4 + k()λX4 = F.
Proof. 
Using phasor to express both sides of m d α x 4 ( t ) d t α + k d λ x 4 ( t ) d t λ = f ( t ) yields (83). The proof is finished. □
Taking into account the principal branches of iα and iλ, we write the left side of the above equation by
m ( i ω ) α X 4 + k ( i ω ) λ X 4 = ( m ω α cos α π 2 + i m ω α sin α π 2 + k ω λ cos λ π 2 + i k ω λ sin λ π 2 ) X 4 = [ m ω α cos α π 2 + i ( m ω α sin α π 2 + k ω λ sin λ π 2 ) + k ω λ cos λ π 2 ] X 4 .
The right side of the above can be written by
[ m ω α cos α π 2 + i ( m ω α sin α π 2 + k ω λ sin λ π 2 ) + k ω λ cos λ π 2 ] X 4 = [ ( m ω α 2 cos α π 2 ) ( i ω ) 2 + ( m ω α 1 sin α π 2 + k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 ) ( i ω ) + k ω λ cos λ π 2 ] X 4 .
Therefore,
m ( i ω ) α X 4 + k ( i ω ) λ X 4 = [ ( m ω α 2 cos α π 2 ) ( i ω ) 2 + ( m ω α 1 sin α π 2 + k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 ) ( i ω ) + k ω λ cos λ π 2 ] X 4 .
Denote by meq4 the equivalent mass for a fractional vibrator of class IV. Then, from (86),
m eq 4 = m eq 1 = m ω α 2 cos α π 2 .
Let ceq4 be the equivalent damping for a fractional vibrator of class IV. Then, from (86),
c eq 4 = m ω α 1 sin α π 2 + k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 .
Denote by keq4 the equivalent stiffness of a fractional vibrator of class IV. Then, from (86),
k eq 4 = k ω λ cos λ π 2 .
Using meq4, ceq4, and keq4, we write the motion phasor equation in Theorem 11 by
[ m ( i ω ) α + k ( i ω ) λ ] X 4 = [ ( i ω ) 2 m eq 4 + i ω c eq 4 + k eq 4 ] X 4 = F .
Denote by ζeq4 the equivalent damping ratio for a fractional vibrator of class IV. Define it by
ς eq 4 = c eq 4 2 m eq 4 k eq 4 .
Then,
ς eq 4 = m ω α 1 sin α π 2 + k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 2 m k ω α + λ 2 | cos α π 2 | cos λ π 2 .
Let ωeqn4 be the equivalent damping free natural angular frequency of a class IV fractional vibrator. Define it by
ω eqn 4 = k eq 4 m eq 4 .
Then,
ω eqn 4 = ω n ω λ cos λ π 2 ω α 2 cos α π 2 .
From the point of view of practice, we adopt |ζeq4| ≤ 1 in what follows. Let ωeqd4 be the equivalent damped natural angular frequency for a fractional vibrator of class IV. Then,
ω eqd 4 = ω eqn 4 1 ς eq 4 2 .
Thus,
ω eqd 4 = ω n ω λ cos λ π 2 ω α 2 cos α π 2 1 ( m ω α 1 sin α π 2 + k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 2 m k ω α + λ 2 | cos α π 2 | cos λ π 2 ) 2 .
Considering the notations of meq4, ceq4, ζeq4, ωeqn4, and ωeqd4, we write the motion phasor equation of a class IV fractional vibrator by
( i ω ) 2 X 4 + i 2 ζ eqn 4 ω eqn 4 X 4 + ω eqn 4 2 X 4 = F m eq 4 .

6.2. Frequency Transfer Function of Class IV Fractional Vibrator

Denote by γeq4 the equivalent frequency ratio of a fractional vibrator of class IV. Define it by
γ eq 4 = ω ω eqn 4 .
Then,
γ eq 4 = γ ω α 2 cos α π 2 ω λ cos λ π 2 .
Denote by H4(ω) the frequency transfer function in phasor for a class IV fractional vibrator. Then,
H 4 ( ω ) = 1 / k eq 4 ω λ cos λ π 2 ( 1 γ 2 ω α 2 cos α π 2 ω λ cos λ π 2 + i 2 γ m ω α 1 sin α π 2 + k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 2 m k ω α + λ 2 | cos α π 2 | cos λ π 2 ω α 2 cos α π 2 ω λ cos λ π 2 ) .
With γeq4 and ζeq4, we write the above by
H 4 ( ω ) = 1 k eq 4 ( 1 γ eq 4 2 + i 2 ς eq 4 γ eq 4 ) .
The above can be written by
H 4 ( ω ) = 1 k ω λ cos λ π 2 ( 1 γ 2 ω α 2 cos α π 2 ω λ cos λ π 2 + i 2 γ m ω α 1 sin α π 2 + k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 2 m k ω α + λ 2 | cos α π 2 | cos λ π 2 ω α 2 cos α π 2 ω λ cos λ π 2 ) .
The amplitude of H4(ω) is
| H 4 ( ω ) | = 1 k eq 4 1 ( 1 γ eq 4 2 ) 2 + ( 2 ς eq 4 γ eq 4 ) 2 .
The phase of H4(ω) is in the form
φ 4 ( ω ) = cos 1 1 γ eq 4 2 ( 1 γ eq 4 2 ) 2 + ( 2 ς eq 4 γ eq 4 ) 2 .

6.3. Stationary Response to Sinusoidal Vibration of Class IV Fractional Vibrator

Theorem 12.
The response phasor of a class IV fractional vibrator is expressed by
X 4 = F k ω λ cos λ π 2 ( 1 γ 2 ω α 2 cos α π 2 ω λ cos λ π 2 + i 2 γ m ω α 1 sin α π 2 + k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 2 m k ω α + λ 2 | cos α π 2 | cos λ π 2 ω α 2 cos α π 2 ω λ cos λ π 2 ) .
Proof. 
Since X4 = H4(ω)F and (100), we see that the above is true. The proof is finished. □
The above equation can be written by
X 4 = F k eq 4 ( 1 γ eq 4 2 + i 2 ς eq 4 γ eq 4 ) .
Theorem 13.
The stationary sinusoidal response to a class IV fractional vibrator is given by
x 4 ( t ) = F 0 / k eq 4 ω λ cos λ π 2 | ( 1 γ 2 ω α 2 cos α π 2 ω λ cos λ π 2 + i 2 γ m ω α 1 s i n α π 2 + k ω λ 1 s i n λ π 2 2 m k ω α + λ 2 | cos α π 2 | cos λ π 2 ω α 2 cos α π 2 ω λ cos λ π 2 ) | sin { ω t + θ cos 1 1 ( ω ω eqn 4 ) 2 [ 1 ( ω ω eqn 4 ) 2 ] 2 + ( 2 ς eq 4 ω ω eqn 4 ) 2 } .
Proof. 
Since x4(t) = Im[X4exp(iωt)], X4 = H4(ω)F, F = F0exp(), and
φ 4 ( ω ) = cos 1 1 γ eq 4 2 ( 1 γ eq 4 2 ) 2 + ( 2 ς eq 4 γ eq 4 ) 2 = cos 1 1 ( ω ω eqn 4 ) 2 [ 1 ( ω ω eqn 4 ) 2 ] 2 + ( 2 ς eq 4 ω ω eqn 4 ) 2 ,
we have x4(t) = Im{|H4(ω)|F0exp(iωt)exp()exp[−(ω)]}, which equals to (107). The proof is finished. □
Figure 4 shows some plots of x4(t) for different values of α and λ when ω = 2, F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, and k = 1. The significant effect of fractional orders α and λ on the response x4(t) can be easily seen from Figure 4.

7. Results for Class V Fractional Vibrators

7.1. Motion Phasor Equation of Class V Fractional Vibrator

Theorem 14.
Denote by X5 the phasor of response x5(t) of a class V fractional vibrator. Let F be the phasor of excitation f(t) = F0sin(ωt + θ). The motion phasor equation of a class V fractional vibrator is expressed by
m()2X5 + k()λX5 = F.
Proof. 
When using phasor to express both sides of m d 2 x 5 ( t ) d t 2 + k d λ x 5 ( t ) d t λ = f ( t ) , we see that the above is true. The proof is finished. □
Using the principal branch of iλ, we express the left side of the above equation by
m ( i ω ) 2 X 5 + k ( i ω ) λ X 5 = ( m ( i ω ) 2 + k ω λ cos λ π 2 + i k ω λ sin λ π 2 ) X 5 = [ m ( i ω ) 2 + i k ω λ sin λ π 2 + k ω λ cos λ π 2 ] X 5 .
Rewriting the right side of the above by
[ m ( i ω ) 2 + i k ω λ sin λ π 2 + k ω λ cos λ π 2 ] X 5 = [ m ( i ω ) 2 + k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 ( i ω ) + k ω λ cos λ π 2 ] X 5 ,
we have
m ( i ω ) 2 X 5 + k ( i ω ) λ X 5 = [ m ( i ω ) 2 + k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 ( i ω ) + k ω λ cos λ π 2 ] X 5 .
Let meq5 be the equivalent mass for a fractional vibrator of class V. Then, from (110),
meq5 = m.
Denote by ceq5 the equivalent damping for a fractional vibrator of class V. Then, from (110),
c eq 5 = k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 .
Let keq5 be the equivalent stiffness of a fractional vibrator of class V. Then, from (110),
k eq 5 = k eq 4 = k ω λ cos λ π 2 .
Thus, we can write the motion phasor equation in Theorem 14 by
[ m ( i ω ) 2 + k ( i ω ) λ ] X 5 = [ ( i ω ) 2 m + i ω c eq 5 + k eq 5 ] X 5 = F .
Let ζeq5 be the equivalent damping ratio for a fractional vibrator of class V. It is defined by
ς eq 5 = c eq 5 2 m k eq 5 .
Then,
ς eq 5 = ω n ω λ 2 1 sin λ π 2 2 cos λ π 2 .
Let ωeqn5 be the equivalent damping free natural angular frequency of a class V fractional vibrator. Define it by
ω eqn 5 = k eq 5 m .
Then,
ω eqn 5 = ω n ω λ cos λ π 2 .
From a view of practical vibrations, we use |ζeq5| ≤ 1 in what follows. Denote by ωeqd5 the equivalent damped natural frequency for a fractional vibrator of class V. Then,
ω eqd 5 = ω eqn 5 1 ς eq 5 2 .
Thus,
ω eqd 5 = ω n ω λ cos λ π 2 1 ( k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 2 m k ω λ cos λ π 2 ) 2 .
Using the notations of meq5, ceq5, ζeq5, ωeqn5, and ωeqd5, we write the motion phasor equation of a class V fractional vibrator by
( i ω ) 2 X 5 + i 2 ζ eqn 5 ω eqn 5 X 5 + ω eqn 5 2 X 5 = F m .

7.2. Frequency Transfer Function of Class V Fractional Vibrator

Let γeq5 be the equivalent frequency ratio of a fractional vibrator of class V. Define it by
γ eq 5 = ω ω eqn 5 .
Then,
γ eq 5 = γ 1 ω λ cos λ π 2 .
Let H5(ω) be the frequency transfer function in phasor for a class V fractional vibrator. Then,
H 5 ( ω ) = 1 / k eq 5 ω λ cos λ π 2 ( 1 γ 2 ω λ cos λ π 2 + i 2 γ k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 2 m k ω λ cos λ π 2 1 ω λ cos λ π 2 ) .
Using γeq5 and ζeq5, we have
H 5 ( ω ) = 1 k eq 5 ( 1 γ eq 5 2 + i 2 ς eq 5 γ eq 5 ) .
The amplitude of H5(ω) is expressed by
| H 5 ( ω ) | = 1 k eq 5 1 ( 1 γ eq 5 2 ) 2 + ( 2 ς eq 5 γ eq 5 ) 2 .
The phase of H5(ω) is
φ 5 ( ω ) = cos 1 1 γ eq 5 2 ( 1 γ eq 5 2 ) 2 + ( 2 ς eq 5 γ eq 5 ) 2 .

7.3. Stationary Response to Sinusoidal Vibration of Class V Fractional Vibrator

Theorem 15.
The response phasor of a class V fractional vibrator is given by
X 5 = F / k ω λ cos λ π 2 ( 1 γ 2 ω λ cos λ π 2 + i 2 γ k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 2 m k ω λ cos λ π 2 1 ω λ cos λ π 2 ) .
Proof. 
Because X5 = H5(ω)F and (124), we see that the above is true. The proof is finished. □
The above equation can be written by
X 5 = F k eq 5 ( 1 γ eq 5 2 + i 2 ς eq 5 γ eq 5 ) .
Theorem 16.
The stationary sinusoidal response to a class V fractional vibrator is given by
x 5 ( t ) = F 0 / k eq 5 ω λ cos λ π 2 | ( 1 γ 2 ω λ cos λ π 2 + i 2 γ k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 2 m k ω λ cos λ π 2 1 ω λ cos λ π 2 ) | sin { ω t + θ cos 1 1 ( ω ω eqn 5 ) 2 [ 1 ( ω ω eqn 5 ) 2 ] 2 + ( 2 ς eq 5 ω ω eqn 5 ) 2 } .
Proof. 
As x5(t) = Im[X5exp(iωt)], X5 = H5(ω)F, F = F0exp(), and
φ 5 ( ω ) = cos 1 1 ( ω ω eqn 5 ) 2 [ 1 ( ω ω eqn 5 ) 2 ] 2 + ( 2 ς eq 5 ω ω eqn 5 ) 2 ,
we have x5(t) = Im{|H5(ω)|F0exp(iωt)exp()exp[−(ω)]}, which equals to (130). The proof is finished. □
Figure 5 indicates some plots of x5(t) for different values of λ when ω = 2, F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, and k = 1. It exhibits the considerable effect of fractional order λ on the response x5(t).

8. Results Regarding Class VI Fractional Vibrators

8.1. Motion Phasor Equation of Class VI Fractional Vibrator

Theorem 17.
Let X6 be the phasor of response x6(t) to a class VI fractional vibrator. Let F be the phasor of excitation f(t) = F0sin(ωt + θ). The motion phasor equation of a class VI fractional vibrator is given by
m()αX6 + c()βX6 + k()λX6 = F.
Proof. 
Using phasor to express both sides of m d α x 6 ( t ) d t α + c d β x 6 ( t ) d t β + k d λ x 6 ( t ) d t λ = f ( t ) yields the above. The proof is finished. □
Using the principal branches of iα, iβ, and iλ, we write the left side of the above equation by
m ( i ω ) α X 6 + c ( i ω ) β X 6 + k ( i ω ) λ X 6 = ( m ω α cos α π 2 + c ω β cos β π 2 ) X 6 + i ( m ω α sin α π 2 + c ω β sin β π 2 + k ω λ sin λ π 2 ) X 6 + k ω λ cos λ π 2 X 6 .
Writing the right side of the above by
[ ( m ω α cos α π 2 + c ω β cos β π 2 ) + i ( m ω α sin α π 2 + c ω β sin β π 2 + k ω λ sin λ π 2 ) + k ω λ cos λ π 2 ] X 6 = [ ( m ω α 2 cos α π 2 + c ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) ( i ω ) 2 + i ω ( m ω α 1 sin α π 2 + c ω β 1 sin β π 2 + k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 ) + k ω λ cos λ π 2 ] X 6 ,
we have
m ( i ω ) α X 6 + c ( i ω ) β X 6 + k ( i ω ) λ X 6 = [ ( m ω α 2 cos α π 2 + c ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) ( i ω ) 2 + i ω ( m ω α 1 sin α π 2 + c ω β 1 sin β π 2 + k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 ) + k ω λ cos λ π 2 ] X 6 .
Denote by meq6 the equivalent mass for a fractional vibrator of class VI. Then, from the above, we have
m eq 6 = m eq 3 = ( m ω α 2 cos α π 2 + c ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) .
Let ceq6 be the equivalent damping for a fractional vibrator of class VI. Then, from (134),
c eq 6 = c eq 6 ( ω , α , β , λ ) = m ω α 1 sin α π 2 + c ω β 1 sin β π 2 + k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 .
Let keq6 be the equivalent stiffness of a fractional vibrator of class VI. According to (134), we have
k eq 6 = k eq 5 = k eq 4 = k ω λ cos λ π 2 .
Now, we write the motion phasor equation in Theorem 17 by
m ( i ω ) α X 6 + c ( i ω ) β X 6 + k ( i ω ) λ X 6 = [ ( i ω ) 2 m eq 6 + i ω c eq 6 + k eq 5 ] X 6 = F .
Denote by ζeq6 the equivalent damping ratio for a fractional vibrator of class VI. Define it by
ς eq 6 = c eq 6 2 m eq 6 k eq 6 .
Then,
ς eq 6 = m ω α 1 sin α π 2 + c ω β 1 sin β π 2 + k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 2 ( m ω α 2 cos α π 2 + c ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) k ω λ cos λ π 2 .
Denote by ωeqn6 the equivalent damping free natural frequency of a class VI fractional vibrator. It is defined by
ω eqn 6 = k eq 6 m eq 6 .
Then,
ω eqn 6 = k ω λ cos λ π 2 ( m ω α 2 cos α π 2 + c ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) .
From a practice view of vibrations, |ζeq6| ≤ 1 is used in what follows. Let ωeqd6 be the equivalent damped natural angular frequency for a fractional vibrator of class VI. Then,
ω eqd 6 = ω eqn 6 1 ς eq 6 2 .
Thus,
ω eqd 6 = k ω λ cos λ π 2 ( m ω α 2 cos α π 2 + c ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) 1 ( m ω α 1 sin α π 2 + c ω β 1 sin β π 2 + k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 2 ( m ω α 2 cos α π 2 + c ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) k ω λ cos λ π 2 ) 2 .
Taking into account the notations of meq6, ceq6, ζeq6, ωeqn6, and ωeqd6, we have the motion phasor equation of a class VI fractional vibrator in the form
( i ω ) 2 X 6 + i 2 ζ eqn 6 ω eqn 6 X 6 + ω eqn 6 2 X 6 = F m eq 6 .

8.2. Frequency Transfer Function of Class VI Fractional Vibrator

Denote by γeq6 the equivalent frequency ratio of a fractional vibrator of class VI. It is defined by
γ eq 6 = ω ω eqn 6 .
Then,
γ eq 6 = γ ( ω α 2 cos α π 2 + 2 ς ω n ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) ω λ cos λ π 2 .
Denote by H6(ω) the frequency transfer function in phasor for a class VI fractional vibrator. Then,
H 6 ( ω ) = X 6 F = 1 k eq 6 ( 1 γ eq 6 2 + i 2 ς eq 6 γ eq 6 ) .
|H6(ω)| is given by
| H 6 ( ω ) | = 1 k eq 6 1 ( 1 γ eq 6 2 ) 2 + ( 2 ς eq 6 γ eq 6 ) 2 .
The phase of H6(ω) is in the form
φ 6 ( ω ) = cos 1 1 γ eq 6 2 ( 1 γ eq 6 2 ) 2 + ( 2 ς eq 6 γ eq 6 ) 2 .

8.3. Stationary Response to Sinusoidal Vibration of Class VI Fractional Vibrator

Theorem 18.
The response phasor of a class VI fractional vibrator is in the form
X 6 = F k eq 6 ( 1 γ eq 6 2 + i 2 ς eq 6 γ eq 6 ) .
Proof. 
Because X6 = H6(ω)F and (148), the above is true. The proof is finished. □
Theorem 19.
The stationary sinusoidal response to a class VI fractional vibrator is in the form
x 6 ( t ) = 1 k eq 6 F ( 1 γ eq 6 2 ) 2 + ( 2 ς eq 6 γ eq 6 ) 2 sin { ω t + θ cos 1 1 ( ω ω eqn 6 ) 2 [ 1 ( ω ω eqn 6 ) 2 ] 2 + ( 2 ς eq 6 ω ω eqn 6 ) 2 } .
Proof. 
Note that x6(t) = Im[X6exp(iωt)], X6 = H6(ω)F, F = F0exp(), and
φ 6 ( ω ) = cos 1 1 ( ω ω eqn 6 ) 2 [ 1 ( ω ω eqn 6 ) 2 ] 2 + ( 2 ς eq 6 ω ω eqn 6 ) 2 ,
we have x6(t) = Im{|H6(ω)|F0exp(iωt)exp()exp[−(ω)]}, which equals to (152). The proof is finished. □
Figure 6 illustrates some plots of x6(t) for different values of α, β, and λ when ω = 2, F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, and k = 1. The significant effect of fractional orders α, β, and λ on the response x6(t) can be seen from Figure 6.

9. Results Regarding Class VII Fractional Vibrators

9.1. Motion Phasor Equation of Class VII Fractional Vibrator

Theorem 20.
Let X7 be the phasor of response x7(t) to a class VII fractional vibrator. Let F be the phasor of excitation f(t) = F0sin(ωt + θ). The motion phasor equation of a class VII fractional vibrator is given by
m()2X7 + c()βX7 + k()λX7 = F.
Proof. 
Using phasor to express both sides of m d 2 x 7 ( t ) d t 2 + c d β x 7 ( t ) d t β + k d λ x 7 ( t ) d t λ = f ( t ) yields the above. The proof is finished. □
Using the principal branches of iβ and iλ, the left side of the above equation is written by
m ω 2 X 7 + c ( i ω ) β X 7 + k ( i ω ) λ X 7 = ( m ω 2 + c ω β cos β π 2 ) X 7 + i ( c ω β sin β π 2 + k ω λ sin λ π 2 ) X 7 + k ω λ cos λ π 2 X 7 .
We write the right side of the above by
[ ( m ω 2 + c ω β cos β π 2 ) + i ( + c ω β sin β π 2 + k ω λ sin λ π 2 ) + k ω λ cos λ π 2 ] X 7 = [ ( m + c ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) ( i ω ) 2 + i ω ( + c ω β 1 sin β π 2 + k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 ) + k ω λ cos λ π 2 ] X 7 .
Therefore,
m ( i ω ) 2 X 7 + c ( i ω ) β X 7 + k ( i ω ) λ X 7 = [ ( m + c ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) ( i ω ) 2 + i ω ( c ω β 1 sin β π 2 + k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 ) + k ω λ cos λ π 2 ] X 7 .
Denote by meq7 the equivalent mass for a fractional vibrator of class VII. Then, we have
m eq 7 = m eq 2 = m c ω β 2 cos β π 2 .
Let ceq7 be the equivalent damping for a fractional vibrator of class VII. Then,
c eq 7 = c ω β 1 sin β π 2 + k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 .
Let keq7 be the equivalent stiffness of a fractional vibrator of class VII. Then,
k eq 7 = k eq 6 = k eq 5 = k eq 4 = k ω λ cos λ π 2 .
Now, write the motion phasor equation of a class VII fractional vibrator by
[ m ( i ω ) 2 + c ( i ω ) β + k ( i ω ) λ ] X 7 = [ ( i ω ) 2 m eq 7 + i ω c eq 7 + k eq 7 ] X 7 = F .
Let ζeq7 be the equivalent damping ratio for a fractional vibrator of class VII. Define it by
ς eq 7 = c eq 7 2 m eq 7 k eq 7 .
Then,
ς eq 7 = c ω β 1 sin β π 2 + k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 2 ( m c ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) k ω λ cos λ π 2 .
Let ωeqn7 be the equivalent damping free natural angular frequency of a class VII fractional vibrator. Define it by
ω eqn 7 = k eq 7 m eq 7 .
Then,
ω eqn 7 = k ω λ cos λ π 2 m c ω β 2 cos β π 2 .
From the point of view of practice vibrations, |ζeq7| ≤ 1 is used in what follows. Let ωeqd7 be the equivalent damped natural angular frequency for a fractional vibrator of class VII. Then,
ω eqd 7 = ω eqn 7 1 ς eq 7 2 .
Therefore,
ω eqd 7 = k ω λ cos λ π 2 m c ω β 2 cos β π 2 1 ( c ω β 1 sin β π 2 + k ω λ 1 sin λ π 2 2 ( m c ω β 2 cos β π 2 ) k ω λ cos λ π 2 ) 2 .
Considering meq7, ceq7, ζeq7, ωeqn7, and ωeqd7, we express the motion phasor equation of a class VII fractional vibrator in the form
( i ω ) 2 X 7 + i 2 ζ eqn 7 ω eqn 7 X 7 + ω eqn 7 2 X 7 = F m eq 7 .

9.2. Frequency Transfer Function of Class VII Fractional Vibrator

Let γeq7 be the equivalent frequency ratio of a fractional vibrator of class VII. Define it by
γ eq 7 = ω ω eqn 7 .
Then,
γ eq 7 = γ 1 2 ς ω n ω β 2 cos β π 2 ω λ cos λ π 2 .
Let H7(ω) be the frequency transfer function in phasor for a class VII fractional vibrator. Then,
H 7 ( ω ) = X 7 F = 1 k eq 7 ( 1 γ eq 7 2 + i 2 ς eq 7 γ eq 7 ) .
Consequently,
| H 7 ( ω ) | = 1 k eq 7 1 ( 1 γ eq 7 2 ) 2 + ( 2 ς eq 7 γ eq 7 ) 2 .
The phase of H7(ω) is in the form
φ 7 ( ω ) = cos 1 1 γ eq 7 2 ( 1 γ eq 7 2 ) 2 + ( 2 ς eq 7 γ eq 7 ) 2 .

9.3. Stationary Response to Sinusoidal Vibration of Class VII Fractional Vibrator

Theorem 21.
The response phasor of a class VII fractional vibrator is in the form
X 7 = F k eq 7 ( 1 γ eq 7 2 + i 2 ς eq 7 γ eq 7 ) .
Proof. 
Because X7 = H7(ω)F, the above is valid. This finishes the proof. □
Theorem 22.
The stationary sinusoidal response to a class VII fractional vibrator is expressed by
x 7 ( t ) = 1 k eq 7 F ( 1 γ eq 7 2 ) 2 + ( 2 ς eq 7 γ eq 7 ) 2 sin { ω t + θ cos 1 1 ( ω ω eqn 7 ) 2 [ 1 ( ω ω eqn 7 ) 2 ] 2 + ( 2 ς eq 7 ω ω eqn 7 ) 2 } .
Proof. 
Due to x7(t) = Im[X7exp(iωt)], X7 = H7(ω)F, F = F0exp(), and
φ 7 ( ω ) = cos 1 1 ( ω ω eqn 7 ) 2 [ 1 ( ω ω eqn 7 ) 2 ] 2 + ( 2 ς eq 7 ω ω eqn 7 ) 2 ,
we have x7(t) = Im{|H7(ω)|F0exp(iωt)exp()exp[−(ω)]}, which equals to (175). The proof is finished. □
Figure 7 shows some plots of x7(t) for different values of β and λ when ω = 2, F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, and k = 1. We can easily see that the effect of fractional orders β and λ on x7(t) is considerable.

10. Discussions

This paper addresses theoretic research for bringing forward the analytical expressions of sinusoidal stationary responses to seven classes of fractional vibrator with elementary functions by using the method of fractional phasor. The theory of conventional vibrations is mature in applications. However, that of fractional vibrations is quite academic at present. In Li [15], Chap. 14 gives a possible explanation of the Rayleigh damping assumption, which may be taken as an application of fractional vibrations.
With respect to the present results regarding sinusoidal stationary responses, fractional oscillators and fractional resonant circuits in electronic engineering may be an application area, where sinusoidal stationary responses are essential as those in structural engineering. We discuss a possible application with respect to the fatigue test below.
Structural fatigue is a subject that is strongly associated with structural vibration (Palley et al. [8], Lalanne [51,52,53]). Regarding the structural fatigue test, a main form of loading is cyclic load, which is usually taken as a sinusoidal function (Palley et al. [8], Lalanne [51,52,53], Sandor [54], Swanson [55], Daggan and Bryne [56]). Let S(t) be a stress function of cyclic load. Let Smax and Smin be the maximum and minimum of S(t), respectively. Denote by Sm = (Smax + Smin)/2, which is the average of S(t). Denote by Sr = (SmaxSmin). It is called stress range. The quantity R = Smin/Smax is called stress ratio. High cycle fatigue test implies that the cycle of a load is large. Low cycle fatigue test means that the cycle of a load is small.
Suppose that a structure follows the class VI fractional vibrator. Then, a cyclic load used in a fatigue test may take the form of sinusoidal stationary response of a class VI fractional vibrator. The function form of that load, therefore, is x6(t). Without losing the generality, let S(t) = x6(t). Different from conventional cyclic load of sinusoidal function, in fatigue test of a structure, Sr and load cycle (or load period) of x6(t) are considerably affected by fractional order triple (α, β, λ) and vibration frequency ω. In order to make it clear, we show some plots of x6(t) in the case of R = −1 and Sm = 5 in Figure 8. From Figure 8, we conclude that there are significant effects of (α, β, λ) and ω on Sr of cyclic load x6(t). Because stress range is crucial to test and evaluation of fatigue performances of a structure [51,52,53,54,55,56], that has to be paid attention to in fatigue test for cyclic loading from the point of view of fractional vibrations.
From Table 1, it is seen that
x 6 ( t ) | c = 0 , λ = 0 = x 1 ( t ) ,
x 6 ( t ) | α = 2 , λ = 0 = x 2 ( t ) ,
x 6 ( t ) | λ = 0 = x 3 ( t ) ,
x 6 ( t ) | c = 0 = x 4 ( t ) ,
x 6 ( t ) | α = 2 , c = 0 = x 5 ( t ) ,
and
x 6 ( t ) | α = 2 = x 7 ( t ) .
Therefore, the conclusion regarding cyclic load x6(t) mentioned above is also true, respectively, for x1(t) (class I fractional vibrators), x2(t) (class II fractional vibrators), x3(t) (class III fractional vibrators), x4(t) (class IV fractional vibrators), x5(t) (class V fractional vibrators), and x7(t) (class V fractional vibrators). To distinguish xj(t) (j = 1, …, 7) from conventional cyclic loads, we call xj(t) fractional cyclic loads. To be precise, if a structure follows class I fractional vibrators, its cyclic load in fatigue test is affected by fractional order α and vibration frequency ω. When a structure follows class II fractional vibrators, its cyclic load for fatigue test is affected by fractional order β and ω. Suppose that a structure follows class III fractional vibrators. Then, its cyclic load in fatigue test is affected by fractional order (α, β) and ω. If a structure follows class IV fractional vibrators, its cyclic load in fatigue test is affected by (α, λ) and ω. When a structure follows class V fractional vibrators, its cyclic load in fatigue test is affected by λ and ω. Suppose that a structure follows class VII fractional vibrators. Then, its cyclic load in fatigue test is affected by (β, λ) and ω. We shall take fractional fatigue loading as one of our future works.
In passing, we note that random fatigue loading is a crucial issue in fatigue test of structures or materials ([51,52,53,54,55,56], Sunder [57], Shang et al. [58], Swanson [59], and our previous work [60,61,62,63]). Fractionally random fatigue loading may be an interesting research topic.

11. Conclusions

For a conventional vibration system, it is well-known to obtain its sinusoidal stationary response by using phasor. However, for a fractional vibration system, it may not be so easy. As a matter of fact, an equation of motion of a fractional vibrator is a fractional differential one. In order to apply phasor method to treat the issue of sinusoidal stationary response to a fractional vibrator, fractional phasor may be necessary to be used. Based on fractional phasor (Lemma 1), we can transform a motion equation of a fractional vibrator to a fractional phasor equation of motion or fractional phasor motion equation. From that fractional phasor motion equation, we can algebraically obtain its response phasor, which is actually a fractional phasor, and then transform it to a sinusoidal stationary response in time. In this way, a sinusoidal stationary response in time to a fractional vibrator is obtained algebraically.
In this paper, we have introduced seven fractional phasor motion equations of seven classes of fractional vibrators in Theorems 2, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, and 20, respectively. From those fractional phasor motion equations, we have presented seven analytical expressions of fractional phasor responses for seven classes of fractional vibrators in Theorems 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21, respectively. Then, seven expressions of sinusoidal stationary responses in time to seven classes of fractional vibration systems have been proposed in Theorems 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, and 22, respectively. One thing worth noting is that those sinusoidal stationary responses in time are only expressed by elementary functions. Effects of fractional orders on stationary sinusoidal responses are considerable, as can be seen from illustrations.

Funding

No funding information for this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A. Formula of Weyl Fractional Derivative

Denote by W v t the operator of the Weyl fractional derivative of order v > 0. Then (Miller and Ross [46], Lavoie et al. [47], p. 245),
W v t f ( t ) = 1 Γ ( v ) t f ( u ) ( t u ) v + 1 d u .
Note that the integral low limit of W v f ( t ) is −∞. Denote by f(t) ↔ F(ω), where F(ω) is the Fourier transform of f(t). Then, W v f ( t ) ( i ω ) v F ( ω ) .

References

  1. Steinmetz, C.P. Theory and Calculation of Alternating Current Phenomena; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1897. [Google Scholar]
  2. Steinmetz, C.P. Engineering Mathematics: A Series of Lectures Delivered at Union College; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1917. [Google Scholar]
  3. Steinmetz, C.P. Complex quantities and their use in electrical engineering. In Proceedings of the International Electrical Congress, Conference of the AIEE: American Institute of Electrical Engineers Proceedings, Chicago, IL, USA, 21–25 August 1893; pp. 33–74. [Google Scholar]
  4. Desoer, C.A.; Kuh, E.S. Basic Circuit Theory; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  5. Qiu, G.Y. Circuits, 4th ed.; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 1999. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. Den Hartog, J.P. Mechanical Vibrations; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1956. [Google Scholar]
  7. Nakagawa, K.; Ringo, M. Engineering Vibrations; Xia, S.R., Translator; Shanghai Science and Technology Publishing House: Shanghai, China, 1981. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. Palley, M.; Bahizov, B.L.; Voroneysk, R.E. Handbook of Ship Structural Mechanics; Xu, B.H.; Xu, X.; Xu, M.Q., Translators; National Defense Industry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2002. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. Grote, K.-H.; Antonsson, E.K. (Eds.) Springer Handbook of Mechanical Engineering; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; Chapter 17. [Google Scholar]
  10. Allemang, R.; Avitabile, P. (Eds.) Handbook of Experimental Structural Dynamics; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  11. Soong, T.T.; Grigoriu, M. Random Vibration of Mechanical and Structural Systems; Prentice-Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rothbart, H.A.; Brown, T.H., Jr. Mechanical Design Handbook, 2nd ed.; Measurement, Analysis and Control of Dynamic Systems; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jin, X.D.; Xia, L.J. Ship Hull Vibration; The Press of Shanghai Jiaotong University: Shanghai, China, 2011. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Harris, C.M. Shock and Vibration Handbook, 5th ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, M. Fractional Vibrations with Applications to Euler-Bernoulli Beams; CRC Press: Boca Raton, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rossikhin, Y.A.; Shitikova, M.V. Analysis of the viscoelastic rod dynamics via models involving fractional derivatives or operators of two different orders. Shock. Vib. Dig. 2004, 36, 3–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rossikhin, Y.A.; Shitikova, M.V. Application of fractional calculus for dynamic problems of solid mechanics: Novel trends and recent results. Appl. Mech. Rev. 2010, 63, 010801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rossikhin, Y.A.; Shitikova, M.V. Application of fractional operators to the analysis of damped vibrations of viscoelastic single-mass systems. J. Sound Vibr. 1997, 199, 567–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rossikhin, Y.A.; Shitikova, M.V. Classical beams and plates in a fractional derivative medium, Impact response. In Encyclopedia of Continuum Mechanics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; Volume 1, pp. 294–305. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rossikhin, Y.A. Reflections on two parallel ways in progress of fractional calculus in mechanics of solids. Appl. Mech. Rev. 2010, 63, 010701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shitikova, M.V. Impact response of a thin shallow doubly curved linear viscoelastic shell rectangular in plan. Math. Mech. Solids 2022, 27, 1721–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shitikova, M.V. Fractional operator viscoelastic models in dynamic problems of mechanics of solids: A review. Mech. Solids 2022, 57, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Uchaikin, V.V. Fractional Derivatives for Physicists and Engineers, Volume I; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; Chapter 7. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pskhu, A.V.; Rekhviashvili, S.S. Analysis of forced oscillations of a fractional oscillator. Technol. Phys. Lett. 2018, 44, 1218–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zelenev, V.M.; Meshkov, S.I.; Rossikhin, Y.A. Damped vibrations of hereditary-elastic systems with weakly singular kernels. J. Appl. Mech. Technol. Phys. 1970, 11, 290–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Freundlich, J. Vibrations of a simply supported beam with a fractional derivative viscoelastic material model—Supports movement excitation. Shock. Vib. 2013, 20, 10. [Google Scholar]
  27. Freundlich, J. Transient vibrations of a fractional Kelvin-Voigt viscoelastic cantilever beam with a tip mass and subjected to a base excitation. J. Sound Vib. 2019, 438, 99–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zurigat, M. Solving fractional oscillators using Laplace homotopy analysis method. Ann. Univ. Craiova Math. Comput. Sci. Ser. 2011, 38, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  29. Blaszczyk, T. A numerical solution of a fractional oscillator equation in a non-resisting medium with natural boundary conditions. Rom. Rep. Phys. 2015, 67, 350–358. [Google Scholar]
  30. Blaszczyk, T.; Ciesielski, M.; Klimek, M.; Leszczynski, J. Numerical solution of fractional oscillator equation. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 218, 2480–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Blaszczyk, T.; Ciesielski, M. Fractional oscillator equationTransformation into integral equation and numerical solution. Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 257, 428–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Al-Rabtah, A.; Ertürk, V.S.; Momani, S. Solutions of a fractional oscillator by using differential transform method. Comput. Math. Appl. 2010, 59, 1356–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Drozdov, A.D. Fractional oscillator driven by a Gaussian noise. Physica A 2007, 376, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Stanislavsky, A.A. Fractional oscillator. Phys. Rev. E 2004, 70, 051103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tofighi, A. The intrinsic damping of the fractional oscillator. Phys. A 2003, 329, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ryabov, Y.E.; Puzenko, A. Damped oscillations in view of the fractional oscillator equation. Phys. Rev. B 2002, 66, 184201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Achar, B.N.N.; Hanneken, J.W.; Clarke, T. Damping characteristics of a fractional oscillator. Phys. A 2004, 339, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Achar, B.N.N.; Hanneken, J.W.; Clarke, T. Response characteristics of a fractional oscillator. Phys. A 2002, 309, 275–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Achar, B.N.N.; Hanneken, J.W.; Enck, T.; Clarke, T. Dynamics of the fractional oscillator. Phys. A 2001, 297, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xu, K.; Chen, L.; Lopes, A.M.; Wang, M.; Li, X. Adaptive fuzzy variable fractional-order sliding mode vibration control of uncertain building structures. Eng. Struct. 2023, 282, 115772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shitikova, M.V.; Kandu, V.V.; Krusser, A.I. On nonlinear vibrations of an elastic plate on a fractional viscoelastic foundation in a viscoelastic medium in the presence of the one-to-one internal resonance. J. Sound Vib. 2023, 549, 117564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Askarian, A.R.; Permoon, M.R.; Shakouri, M. Vibration analysis of pipes conveying fluid resting on a fractional Kelvin-Voigt viscoelastic foundation with general boundary conditions. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2020, 179, 105702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, M. Three classes of fractional oscillators. Symmetry 2018, 10, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, M. PSD and cross PSD of responses of seven classes of fractional vibrations driven by fGn, fBm, fractional OU process, and von Kármán process. Symmetry 2024, 16, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Weyl, H. Bemerkungen zum Begriff des Differentialquotienten gebrochener Ordnung. Vierteljschr-Naturforsch. Ges. Zurich 1917, 62, 296–302. [Google Scholar]
  46. Miller, K.S.; Ross, B. An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  47. Lavoie, J.L.; Osler, T.J.; Tremblay, R. Fractional derivatives and special functions. SIAM Rev. 1976, 18, 240–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Raina, R.K.; Koul, C.L. On Weyl fractional calculus. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1979, 73, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Klafter, J.; Lim, S.C.; Metzler, R. Fractional Dynamics: Recent Advances; World Scientific: Singapore, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  50. Li, M. Modified multifractional Gaussian noise and its application. Phys. Scr. 2021, 96, 125002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lalanne, C. Mechanical Vibration and Shock, Volume 3: Random Vibration, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  52. Lalanne, C. Mechanical Vibration and Shock, Volume 5: Specification Development, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  53. Lalanne, C. Mechanical Vibration and Shock, Volume 4: Fatigue Damage, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  54. Sandor, B.I. Fundamentals of Cyclic Stress and Strain; The University of Wisconsin Press: Madison, WI, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  55. Swanson, S.R. (Ed.) Handbook of Fatigue Testing; ASTM STP 566; ASTM: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  56. Daggan, T.V.; Bryne, J. Fatigue as a Design Criterion; Macmillan Press Ltd.: New York, NY, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  57. Sunder, R. Spectrum load fatigue—Underlying mechanisms and their significance in testing and analysis. Int. J. Fatigue 2003, 25, 971–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shang, D.; Wang, D.; Li, M.; Yao, W. Local stress–strain field intensity approach to fatigue life prediction under random cyclic loading. Int. J. Fatigue 2001, 23, 903–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Swanson, S.R. Random load fatigue test: A state of the art survey. Mater. Res. Stand. 1968, 8, 10–44. [Google Scholar]
  60. Li, M. An iteration method to adjusting random loading for a laboratory fatigue test. Int. J. Fatigue 2005, 27, 783–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, M. Experimental stability analysis of test system for doing fatigue test under random loading. J. Test. Eval. 2006, 34, 364–367. [Google Scholar]
  62. Li, M.; Wu, Y.-S.; Xu, B.-H.; Jia, W.; Zhao, W. An on-line correction technique of random loading with a real-time signal processor for a laboratory fatigue test. J. Test. Eval. 2000, 28, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, M.; Xu, B.-H.; Wu, Y.-S. An H2-optimal control of random loading for a laboratory fatigue test. J. Test. Eval. 1998, 26, 619–625. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Plots of x1(t) for α = 1.2 (solid), 2 (dot), and 2.5 (dash) when ω = 2, F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, and k = 1.
Figure 1. Plots of x1(t) for α = 1.2 (solid), 2 (dot), and 2.5 (dash) when ω = 2, F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, and k = 1.
Fractalfract 08 00479 g001
Figure 2. Plots of x2(t) for β = 0.4 (solid), 1 (dot), and 1.5 (dash) when ω = 2, F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, and k = 1.
Figure 2. Plots of x2(t) for β = 0.4 (solid), 1 (dot), and 1.5 (dash) when ω = 2, F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, and k = 1.
Fractalfract 08 00479 g002
Figure 3. Plots of x3(t) when ω = 2, F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, and k = 1. (a). β = 0.8 when α = 1.3 (solid), 1.8 (dot), and 2.6 (dash). (b). β = 1.5 when α = 1.3 (solid), 1.8 (dot), and 2.6 (dash).
Figure 3. Plots of x3(t) when ω = 2, F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, and k = 1. (a). β = 0.8 when α = 1.3 (solid), 1.8 (dot), and 2.6 (dash). (b). β = 1.5 when α = 1.3 (solid), 1.8 (dot), and 2.6 (dash).
Fractalfract 08 00479 g003
Figure 4. Plots of x4(t) when ω = 2, F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, and k = 1. (a). λ = 0.8 for α = 1.3 (solid), 1.8 (dot), and 2.6 (dash). (b). λ = 0.4 for α = 1.3 (solid), 1.8 (dot), and 2.6 (dash).
Figure 4. Plots of x4(t) when ω = 2, F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, and k = 1. (a). λ = 0.8 for α = 1.3 (solid), 1.8 (dot), and 2.6 (dash). (b). λ = 0.4 for α = 1.3 (solid), 1.8 (dot), and 2.6 (dash).
Fractalfract 08 00479 g004
Figure 5. Plots of x5(t) when ω = 2, F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, and k = 1 for λ = 0.9 (solid), 0.5 (dot), and 0.1 (dash).
Figure 5. Plots of x5(t) when ω = 2, F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, and k = 1 for λ = 0.9 (solid), 0.5 (dot), and 0.1 (dash).
Fractalfract 08 00479 g005
Figure 6. Plots of x6(t) when ω = 2, F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, and k = 1. (a). α = 1.8, β = 1.2 for λ = 0.8 (solid), 0.5 (dot), 0.2 (dash). (b). α = 1.8, λ = 0.8 for β = 1.2 (solid), 0.8 (dot), 0.4 (dash). (c). β = 0.8, λ = 0.8 for α = 2.2 (solid), 1.8 (dot), 1.4 (dash).
Figure 6. Plots of x6(t) when ω = 2, F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, and k = 1. (a). α = 1.8, β = 1.2 for λ = 0.8 (solid), 0.5 (dot), 0.2 (dash). (b). α = 1.8, λ = 0.8 for β = 1.2 (solid), 0.8 (dot), 0.4 (dash). (c). β = 0.8, λ = 0.8 for α = 2.2 (solid), 1.8 (dot), 1.4 (dash).
Fractalfract 08 00479 g006aFractalfract 08 00479 g006b
Figure 7. Plots of x7(t) for ω = 2, F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, and k = 1. (a). β = 1.2 for λ = 0.8 (solid), 0.5 (dot), 0.2 (dash). (b). λ = 0.8 for β = 1.2 (solid), 0.8 (dot), 0.4 (dash).
Figure 7. Plots of x7(t) for ω = 2, F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, and k = 1. (a). β = 1.2 for λ = 0.8 (solid), 0.5 (dot), 0.2 (dash). (b). λ = 0.8 for β = 1.2 (solid), 0.8 (dot), 0.4 (dash).
Fractalfract 08 00479 g007
Figure 8. Plots of cyclic load x6(t) when F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, c = 0.2, k = 1 R = −1, and Sm = 5 for (α, β, λ) = (1.7, 1.9, 0.3) (solid), (α, β, λ) = (1.5, 1.7, 0.5) (dot). (a). For ω = 0.6. (b). For ω = 1.0. (c). For ω = 1.5.
Figure 8. Plots of cyclic load x6(t) when F0 = 1, θ = 0, m = 1, c = 0.2, k = 1 R = −1, and Sm = 5 for (α, β, λ) = (1.7, 1.9, 0.3) (solid), (α, β, λ) = (1.5, 1.7, 0.5) (dot). (a). For ω = 0.6. (b). For ω = 1.0. (c). For ω = 1.5.
Fractalfract 08 00479 g008aFractalfract 08 00479 g008b
Table 1. Seven classes of fractional vibration systems.
Table 1. Seven classes of fractional vibration systems.
ClassificationMotion EquationsRanges Fractional Orders
Class I m d α x 1 ( t ) d t α + k x 1 ( t ) = f ( t ) 0 < α < 3
Class II m d 2 x 2 ( t ) d t 2 + c d β x 2 ( t ) d t β + k x 2 ( t ) = f ( t ) 0 < β < 2
Class III m d α x 3 ( t ) d t α + c d β x 3 ( t ) d t β + k x 3 ( t ) = f ( t ) 0 < α < 3, 0 < β < 2
Class IV m d α x 4 ( t ) d t α + k d λ x 4 ( t ) d t λ = f ( t ) 0 < α < 3, 0 ≤ λ < 1
Class V m d 2 x 5 ( t ) d t 2 + k d λ x 5 ( t ) d t λ = f ( t ) 0 ≤ λ < 1
Class VI m d α x 6 ( t ) d t α + c d β x 6 ( t ) d t β + k d λ x 6 ( t ) d t λ = f ( t ) 0 < α < 3, 0 < β < 2, 0 ≤ λ < 1
Class VII m d 2 x 7 ( t ) d t 2 + c d β x 7 ( t ) d t β + k d λ x 7 ( t ) d t λ = f ( t ) 0 < β < 2, 0 ≤ λ < 1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, M. Stationary Responses of Seven Classes of Fractional Vibrations Driven by Sinusoidal Force. Fractal Fract. 2024, 8, 479. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8080479

AMA Style

Li M. Stationary Responses of Seven Classes of Fractional Vibrations Driven by Sinusoidal Force. Fractal and Fractional. 2024; 8(8):479. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8080479

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Ming. 2024. "Stationary Responses of Seven Classes of Fractional Vibrations Driven by Sinusoidal Force" Fractal and Fractional 8, no. 8: 479. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8080479

APA Style

Li, M. (2024). Stationary Responses of Seven Classes of Fractional Vibrations Driven by Sinusoidal Force. Fractal and Fractional, 8(8), 479. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8080479

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop