Next Article in Journal
A New Parallelized Computation Method of HASC-N Difference Scheme for Inhomogeneous Time Fractional Fisher Equation
Previous Article in Journal
Stability Analysis for a Fractional-Order Coupled FitzHugh–Nagumo-Type Neuronal Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Novel Approaches for Differentiable Convex Functions via the Proportional Caputo-Hybrid Operators

by
Mustafa Gürbüz
1,
Ahmet Ocak Akdemir
2,* and
Mustafa Ali Dokuyucu
2
1
Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Education, Aǧri Ibrahim Cecen University, Agri 04100, Turkey
2
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Letters, Aǧri Ibrahim Cecen University, Agri 04100, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fractal Fract. 2022, 6(5), 258; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6050258
Submission received: 19 April 2022 / Revised: 1 May 2022 / Accepted: 3 May 2022 / Published: 7 May 2022

Abstract

:
This study is built on the relationship between inequality theory and fractional analysis. Thanks to the new fractional operators and based on the proportional Caputo-hybrid operators, integral inequalities containing new approaches are obtained for differentiable convex functions. In the findings section, firstly, an integral identity is obtained and various integral inequalities are obtained based on this identity. The peculiarity of the results is that a hybrid operator has been used in inequality theory, which includes the derivative and integral operators together.

1. Introduction

The definition of convex functions, which is one of the important concepts of inequality theory, has been the focus of attention of many researchers because of the inequality and the aesthetic structure it contains. The concept of inequalities and convexity have continued to exist in the literature as inseparable pairs. In [1], Pečarić et al. have presented a collection of classical and novel inequalities that can be widely applied in statistics, physics, engineering sciences, applied sciences, and numerical analysis, as well as mathematical analysis. Many famous inequalities such as Hermite-Hadamard, Ostrowski, Simpson, Minkowski, Jensen and Young inequality and their various versions have become motivational points in the work of researchers. In [2], the authors have proved some new Hadamard type inequalities for m- and ( α , m ) -functions. Further studies on m-convex functions that are general forms of the convexity and the star-shaped functions, were obtained by Dragomir and Toader in [3,4].
Another modification of convex functions is the concept of convexity in coordinates. We recommend the articles [5,6,7,8,9,10] to the readers for obtaining more details on the concept of coordinates convexity, the properties, and inclusions, different types of convexity in coordinates, and various Hadamard-type integral inequalities obtained for these function classes.
As in all branches of mathematics, fractional analysis, which has recently shown its effect in many fields such as physics, engineering sciences, mathematical biology, modeling, control theory, chaos theory and optimization and has brought new orientations to all of these fields, is based on the calculation of derivatives and integrals of arbitrary order. The main motivation point of fractional analysis, which has its origins as long as classical analysis, is to explain physical and mathematical phenomena with the help of operators of fractional order. While fractional analysis sometimes provides convenience in the solutions of real world problems, it sometimes causes serious optimization problems in the error amounts of the solutions. The feature that gives this movement to fractional calculus is the algebraic structures and properties of the new fractional derivative and associated integral operators. The kernel structures of fractional derivative and integral operators have differences in terms of features such as singularity, locality, and general form.
We present to your attention some studies [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27], including the innovative and motivating findings of various researchers on inequalities, disease models, real world problems and so on, through new concepts of fractional calculus.

2. Preliminaries

Let’s start with the definition of the concept of a convex function, which attracts attention in many fields such as statistics, convex programming, numerical analysis and approximation theory.
Definition 1
([1]). The function Y : [ c 1 , c 2 ] , is said to be convex, if we have
Y λ r + ( 1 λ ) s λ Y ( r ) + 1 λ Y ( s )
for all r , s [ c 1 , c 2 ] and λ [ 0 , 1 ] .
Besides, the concept of convex function has many useful properties, it also forms the basis of the Hermite-Hadamard (HH) inequality, one of the well-known fundamental and famous inequalities in the literature. The HH inequality, which has the potential to produce lower and upper bounds to the mean value of a convex function in the Cauchy sense, has inspired many researchers in mathematical analysis with its applications. The statement of this inequality is as follows.
If a mapping Y : J is a convex function on J and r , s J , r < s , then
Y ( r + s 2 ) 1 s r r s Y ( λ ) d λ Y ( r ) + Y ( s ) 2 .
We recommend that readers refer to papers [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,28,29,30,31] for versions of the HH inequality for different kinds of convex functions, its modification to co-ordinates, and its expansions with the help of various new fractional integral operators.
The definition of the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operator can be given as following (see [32]):
Definition 2.
Let κ L [ μ , ν ] . The Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals J μ + α and J ν α of order α > 0 with μ 0 are defined by
J μ + α κ ( x ) = 1 Γ ( α ) μ x ( x ρ ) α 1 κ ( ρ ) d ρ , x > μ
and
J ν α κ ( x ) = 1 Γ ( α ) x ν ( ρ x ) α 1 κ ( ρ ) d ρ , x < ν
respectively, where Γ ( α ) is the Gamma function defined by Γ ( α ) = 0 e ρ ρ α 1 d ρ and J μ + 0 κ ( x ) = J ν 0 κ ( x ) = κ ( x ) .
The following definition is very important for fractional calculus (see [33]).
Definition 3.
Let α > 0 and α { 1 , 2 , 3 , . . . } , n = [ α ] + 1 , f A C n [ a , b ] , the space of functions having n-th derivatives absolutely continuous. The left-sided and right-sided Caputo fractional derivatives of order α are defined as follows:
c D a + α f ( x ) = 1 Γ ( n α ) a x f ( n ) ( t ) ( x t ) α n + 1 d t ( x > a )
and
c D b α f ( x ) = 1 Γ ( n α ) x b f ( n ) ( t ) ( t x ) α n + 1 d t ( x < b ) .
If α = n { 1 , 2 , 3 , } and usual derivative f ( n ) ( x ) of order n exists, then Caputo fractional derivative c D a + α f ( x ) coincides with f ( n ) ( x ) whereas c D b α f ( x ) coincides with f ( n ) ( x ) with exactness to a constant multiplier ( 1 ) n . In particular we have
c D a + 0 f ( x ) = c D b 0 f ( x ) = f ( x ) ,
where n = 1 and α = 0 .
The proportional Caputo hybrid operator, which was put forward as a non-local and singular operator containing both derivative and integral operator parts in its definition, and which is a simple linear combination of the Riemann-Liouville integral and the Caputo derivative operators, is defined as follows (see [34]).
Definition 4.
Let f : I R + R be a differentiable function on I . Also let f and f are locally L 1 functions on I. Then, the proportional Caputo-hybrid operator may be defined as
0 C P C D t α f t = 1 Γ 1 α 0 t K 1 α f τ + K 0 α f τ t τ α d τ
where α 0 , 1 and K 0 and K 1 are functions satisfing
lim α 0 + K 0 α = 0 ; lim α 1 K 0 α = 1 ; K 0 α 0 , α 0 , 1 ;
lim α 0 + K 1 α = 0 ; lim α 1 K 1 α = 1 ; K 1 α 0 , α 0 , 1 .
Remark 1
(See [34]). We originally wrote this paper using the specific case
K 0 α , t = α t 1 α K 1 α , t = ( 1 α ) t α
which is afforded special attention in [35].
The main purpose of this study is to obtain an integral identity that is likely to contribute to the field of inequalities with the help of the proportional-Caputo hybrid operators and to prove new integral inequalities for the class of differentiable convex functions based on this identity.

3. Findings

An important integral identity is emboided in the following lemma that will be useful to prove the main findings as follows:
Lemma 1.
Let f : I R + R be a twice differentiable function on I . Also let f and f are locally L 1 functions on I. Then, the following equality holds:
K 1 α 0 1 t 1 α f t a + 1 t x d t + K 0 α 0 1 t 1 α f t a + 1 t x d t + K 1 α 0 1 t 1 α f t x + 1 t b d t + K 0 α 0 1 t 1 α f t x + 1 t b d t = K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a x a K 1 α f x + K 0 α f x b x + Γ 2 α a C P C D x α f x x a 2 α + x C P C D b α f b b x 2 α
where α 0 , 1 ,   a < x < b and K 0 and K 1 are functions satisfing the conditions (1) and (2).
Proof. 
With the above assumptions it can be written that
0 1 t 1 α f t a + 1 t x d t = t 1 α f t a + 1 t x a x 0 1 0 1 f t a + 1 t x a x 1 α t α d t = f a x a + 1 α x a 0 1 t α f t a + 1 t x d t = f a x a + 1 α x a x a x u x a α f u d u a x = f a x a + 1 α x a 2 α a x x u α f u d u .
Similarly, we have
0 1 t 1 α f t a + 1 t x d t = f a x a + 1 α x a 2 α a x x u α f u d u .
Multiplying (3) by K 1 α Γ 1 α and (4) by K 0 α Γ 1 α respectively and adding them side by side, we get
K 1 α Γ 1 α 0 1 t 1 α f t a + 1 t x d t + K 0 α Γ 1 α 0 1 t 1 α f t a + 1 t x d t = K 1 α Γ 1 α f a x a + 1 α x a 2 α a x x u α f u d u + K 0 α Γ 1 α f a x a + 1 α x a 2 α a x x u α f u d u = 1 x a Γ 1 α K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a + 1 α x a 2 α Γ 1 α a x K 1 α f u + K 0 α f u x u α d u = 1 x a Γ 1 α K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a + 1 α x a 2 α a C P C D x α f x .
Also, it is easy to see that
0 1 t 1 α f t x + 1 t b d t = t 1 α f t x + 1 t b x b 0 1 0 1 f t x + 1 t b x b 1 α t α d t = f x b x + 1 α b x 0 1 t α f t x + 1 t b d t = f x b x + 1 α b x b x b u b x α f u d u x b = f x b x + 1 α b x 2 α x b b u α f u d u
and similarly
0 1 t 1 α f t x + 1 t b d t = f x b x + 1 α b x 2 α x b b u α f u d u .
Multiplying (6) by K 1 α Γ 1 α and (7) by K 0 α Γ 1 α respectively and adding them side by side, we get
K 1 α Γ 1 α 0 1 t 1 α f t x + 1 t b d t + K 0 α Γ 1 α 0 1 t 1 α f t x + 1 t b d t = K 1 α Γ 1 α f x b x + 1 α b x 2 α x b b u α f u d u + K 0 α Γ 1 α f x b x + 1 α b x 2 α x b b u α f u d u = 1 b x Γ 1 α K 1 α f x + K 0 α f x + 1 α b x 2 α Γ 1 α x b K 1 α f u + K 0 α f u b u α d u = 1 b x Γ 1 α K 1 α f x + K 0 α f x + 1 α b x 2 α x C P C D b α f b .
By adding (5) and (8) and multiplying with Γ 1 α , we get the desired result. □
Theorem 1.
Let f : I R + R be a twice differentiable function on I . Also let f and f are locally L 1 functions on I. If f and f are convex on I , then the following inequality holds:
K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a x a K 1 α f x + K 0 α f x b x + Γ 2 α a C P C D x α f x x a 2 α + x C P C D b α f b b x 2 α K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a 3 α + K 1 α f b + K 0 α f b 3 α 2 α + K 1 α f x + K 0 α f x 2 α
where α 0 , 1 ,   a < x < b and K 0 and K 1 are functions satisfing the conditions (1) and (2).
Proof. 
From Lemma 1 and using properties of absolute value, we have
K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a x a K 1 α f x + K 0 α f x b x + Γ 2 α a C P C D x α f x x a 2 α + x C P C D b α f b b x 2 α K 1 α 0 1 t 1 α f t a + 1 t x d t + K 0 α 0 1 t 1 α f t a + 1 t x d t + K 1 α 0 1 t 1 α f t x + 1 t b d t + K 0 α 0 1 t 1 α f t x + 1 t b d t .
As f and f are convex functions on I, one can write
K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a x a K 1 α f x + K 0 α f x b x + Γ 2 α a C P C D x α f x x a 2 α + x C P C D b α f b b x 2 α K 1 α 0 1 t 1 α t f a + 1 t f x d t + K 0 α 0 1 t 1 α t f a + 1 t f x d t + K 1 α 0 1 t 1 α t f x + 1 t f b d t + K 0 α 0 1 t 1 α t f x + 1 t f b d t .
Namely,
K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a x a K 1 α f x + K 0 α f x b x + Γ 2 α a C P C D x α f x x a 2 α + x C P C D b α f b b x 2 α = K 1 α f x + K 0 α f x 0 1 t 1 α 1 t + t 2 α d t + K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a 0 1 t 2 α d t + K 1 α f b + K 0 α f b 0 1 t 1 α 1 t d t .
The proof is completed by making the necessary calculations. □
Corollary 1.
Under the assumptions of Theorem 1, if we choose x = a + b 2 , then the following inequality holds:
K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a b a K 1 α f a + b 2 + K 0 α f a + b 2 b a + 2 1 α Γ 2 α a C P C D a + b 2 α f a + b 2 b a 2 α + a + b 2 C P C D b α f b b a 2 α K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a 2 3 α + K 1 α f b + K 0 α f b 2 3 α 2 α + K 1 α f a + b 2 + K 0 α f a + b 2 2 2 α .
Theorem 2.
Let f : I R + R be a twice differentiable function on I . Also let f and f are locally L 1 functions on I. If f q and f q are convex on I , then the following inequality holds:
K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a x a K 1 α f x + K 0 α f x b x + Γ 2 α a C P C D x α f x x a 2 α + x C P C D b α f b b x 2 α 1 1 α p + 1 1 p 2 1 q K 1 α f a q + f x q 1 q + K 0 α f a q + f x q 1 q + K 1 α f x q + f b q 1 q + K 0 α f x q + f b q 1 q
where α 0 , 1 ,   a < x < b , p , q > 1 with 1 p + 1 q = 1 and K 0 and K 1 are functions satisfing the conditions (1) and (2).
Proof. 
By applying Hölder’s inequality to (9), we get
K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a x a K 1 α f x + K 0 α f x b x + Γ 2 α a C P C D x α f x x a 2 α + x C P C D b α f b b x 2 α K 1 α 0 1 t 1 α p d t 1 p 0 1 f t a + 1 t x q d t 1 q + K 0 α 0 1 t 1 α p d t 1 p 0 1 f t a + 1 t x q d t 1 q + K 1 α 0 1 t 1 α p d t 1 p 0 1 f t x + 1 t b q d t 1 q + K 0 α 0 1 t 1 α p d t 1 p 0 1 f t x + 1 t b q d t 1 q .
Using convexity of f q and f q , we have
K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a x a K 1 α f x + K 0 α f x b x + Γ 2 α a C P C D x α f x x a 2 α + x C P C D b α f b b x 2 α 1 1 α p + 1 1 p K 1 α 0 1 t f a q + 1 t f x q d t 1 q + K 0 α 0 1 t f a q + 1 t f x q d t 1 q + K 1 α 0 1 t f x q + 1 t f b q d t 1 q + K 0 α 0 1 t f x q + 1 t f b q d t 1 q .
With simple calculations, we get
K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a x a K 1 α f x + K 0 α f x b x + Γ 2 α a C P C D x α f x x a 2 α + x C P C D b α f b b x 2 α 1 1 α p + 1 1 p K 1 α f a q + f x q 2 1 q + K 0 α f a q + f x q 2 1 q + K 1 α f x q + f b q 2 1 q + K 0 α f x q + f b q 2 1 q
which is the desired result. □
Corollary 2.
Under the assumptions of Theorem 2, if we set x = a + b 2 , then the following inequality holds:
K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a b a K 1 α f a + b 2 + K 0 α f a + b 2 b a + 2 1 α Γ 2 α a C P C D a + b 2 α f a + b 2 b a 2 α + a + b 2 C P C D b α f b b a 2 α × 2 1 + 1 / q 1 α p + 1 1 p K 1 α f a q + f a + b 2 q 1 q + K 0 α f a q + f a + b 2 q 1 q + K 1 α f a + b 2 q + f b q 1 q + K 0 α f a + b 2 q + f b q 1 q .
Theorem 3.
Let f : I R + R be a twice differentiable function on I . Also let f and f are locally L 1 functions on I. If f q and f q are convex on I , then the following inequality holds:
K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a x a K 1 α f x + K 0 α f x b x + Γ 2 α a C P C D x α f x x a 2 α + x C P C D b α f b b x 2 α × 2 α 1 1 q K 1 α f a q 3 α + f x q 2 α 3 α 1 q + K 0 α f a q 3 α + f x q 2 α 3 α 1 q + K 1 α f x q 3 α + f b q 2 α 3 α 1 q + K 0 α f x q 3 α + f b q 2 α 3 α 1 q
where α 0 , 1 ,   a < x < b , q 1 and K 0 and K 1 are functions satisfing the conditions (1) and (2).
Proof. 
By applying power mean inequality to (9), we get
K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a x a K 1 α f x + K 0 α f x b x + Γ 2 α a C P C D x α f x x a 2 α + x C P C D b α f b b x 2 α K 1 α 0 1 t 1 α d t 1 1 q 0 1 t 1 α f t a + 1 t x q d t 1 q + K 0 α 0 1 t 1 α d t 1 1 q 0 1 t 1 α f t a + 1 t x q d t 1 q + K 1 α 0 1 t 1 α d t 1 1 q 0 1 t 1 α f t x + 1 t b q d t 1 q + K 0 α 0 1 t 1 α d t 1 1 q 0 1 t 1 α f t x + 1 t b q d t 1 q .
Using convexity of f q and f q , we have
K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a x a K 1 α f x + K 0 α f x b x + Γ 2 α a C P C D x α f x x a 2 α + x C P C D b α f b b x 2 α 1 2 α 1 1 q K 1 α 0 1 t 1 α t f a q + 1 t f x q d t 1 q + K 0 α 0 1 t 1 α t f a q + 1 t f x q d t 1 q + K 1 α 0 1 t 1 α t f x q + 1 t f b q d t 1 q + K 0 α 0 1 t 1 α t f x q + 1 t f b q d t 1 q .
Making necessary calculations, we get
K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a x a K 1 α f x + K 0 α f x b x + Γ 2 α a C P C D x α f x x a 2 α + x C P C D b α f b b x 2 α 1 2 α 1 1 q K 1 α f a q 3 α + f x q 2 α 3 α 1 q + K 0 α f a q 3 α + f x q 2 α 3 α 1 q + K 1 α f x q 3 α + f b q 2 α 3 α 1 q + K 0 α f x q 3 α + f b q 2 α 3 α 1 q .
So, the proof is completed. □
Corollary 3.
Under the assumptions of Theorem 3, if we take x = a + b 2 , then the following inequality is valid:
K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a b a K 1 α f a + b 2 + K 0 α f a + b 2 b a + 2 2 α Γ 2 α a C P C D a + b 2 α f a + b 2 b a 2 α + a + b 2 C P C D b α f b b a 2 α × 2 α 1 1 q K 1 α f a q 3 α + f a + b 2 q 2 α 3 α 1 q + K 0 α f a q 3 α + f a + b 2 q 2 α 3 α 1 q + K 1 α f a + b 2 q 3 α + f b q 2 α 3 α 1 q + K 0 α f a + b 2 q 3 α + f b q 2 α 3 α 1 q .
Theorem 4.
Let f : I R + R be a twice differentiable function on I . Also let f and f are locally L 1 functions on I. If f q and f q are convex on I , then the following inequality holds:
K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a x a K 1 α f x + K 0 α f x b x + Γ 2 α a C P C D x α f x x a 2 α + x C P C D b α f b b x 2 α 2 K 1 α + K 0 α p 2 1 α + p + K 1 α 2 q f a q + 2 f x q + f b q + K 0 α 2 q f a q + 2 f x q + f b q
where α 0 , 1 ,   a < x < b , 1 p + 1 q = 1 , q > 1 and K 0 and K 1 are functions satisfing (1) and (2).
Proof. 
Taking into account the Young inequality as m n m p p + n q q in (9), we get
K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a x a K 1 α f x + K 0 α f x b x + Γ 2 α a C P C D x α f x x a 2 α + x C P C D b α f b b x 2 α K 1 α 1 p 0 1 t p 1 α d t + 1 q 0 1 f t a + 1 t x q d t + K 0 α 1 p 0 1 t p 1 α d t + 1 q 0 1 f t a + 1 t x q d t + K 1 α 1 p 0 1 t p 1 α d t + 1 q 0 1 f t x + 1 t b q d t + K 0 α 1 p 0 1 t p 1 α d t + 1 q 0 1 f t x + 1 t b q d t .
Using convexity of f q and f q , we have
K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a x a K 1 α f x + K 0 α f x b x + Γ 2 α a C P C D x α f x x a 2 α + x C P C D b α f b b x 2 α K 1 α 1 p 2 1 α + p + 1 q 0 1 t f a q + 1 t f x q d t + K 0 α 1 p 2 1 α + p + 1 q 0 1 t f a q + 1 t f x q d t + K 1 α 1 p 2 1 α + p + 1 q 0 1 t f x q + 1 t f b q d t + K 0 α 1 p 2 1 α + p + 1 q 0 1 t f x q + 1 t f b q d t .
By making necessary computations, we get
K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a x a K 1 α f x + K 0 α f x b x + Γ 2 α a C P C D x α f x x a 2 α + x C P C D b α f b b x 2 α K 1 α 1 p 2 1 α + p + f a q + f x q 2 q + K 0 α 1 p 2 1 α + p + f a q + f x q 2 q + K 1 α 1 p 2 1 α + p + f x q + f b q 2 q + K 0 α 1 p 2 1 α + p + f x q + f b q 2 q
which completes the proof. □
Corollary 4.
Under the assumptions of Theorem 4, if we select x = a + b 2 , then we have
K 1 α f a + K 0 α f a b a K 1 α f a + b 2 + K 0 α f a + b 2 b a + 2 1 α Γ 2 α a C P C D a + b 2 α f a + b 2 b a 2 α + a + b 2 C P C D b α f b b a 2 α K 1 α + K 0 α p 2 1 α + p + K 1 α 4 q f a q + 2 f a + b 2 q + f b q + K 0 α 4 q f a q + 2 f a + b 2 q + f b q .
Remark 2.
Several special cases can be considered by choosing the functions K 0 α and K 1 α as in Remark 1.

4. Conclusions

The main motivation point of studies in the field of inequality theory is to obtain new and general inequalities. Different kinds of convex functions, some classical inequalities such as Hölder’s inequality, Power-mean inequality, Young’s inequality, and basic mathematical analysis methods are used to create some known inequalities in the literature and various new versions of these inequalities. Recent developments in the field of fractional analysis have also affected the field of inequalities, and several new studies have been performed to optimize the bounds with the help of different fractional integral operators. Within the scope of the study, it is aimed to prove various new inequalities by using proportional Caputo-hybrid fractional operators for differentiable convex functions. With the help of this new operator, which we used for the first time in the field of inequalities, new results can be produced for different kinds of convex functions and different types of inequalities.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.O.A. and M.G.; methodology, M.G.; formal analysis, M.G. and A.O.A.; investigation, M.A.D.; writing-original draft preparation, M.A.D.; writing-review and editing, A.O.A. and M.A.D.; supervision, A.O.A.; project administration, M.G.; funding acquisition, A.O.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Agri Ibrahim Cecen University Scientific Research Projects Unit with project number EF.20.001.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The research of the authors has been supported by Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University Scientific Research Projects Unit.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pečarić, J.E.; Mitrinovic, D.S.; Fink, A.M. Classical and New Inequalities in Analysis; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 1993; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakula, M.K.; Özdemir, M.E.; Pečarić, J. Hadamard-type inequalities for m-convex and (α,m)-convex functions. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 2007, 9, 96. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dragomir, S.S.; Toader, G. Some inequalities for m-convex functions, Studia University Babes Bolyai. Mathematica 1993, 38, 21–28. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dragomir, S.S. On some new inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for m-convex functions. Tamkang J. Math. 2002, 33, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Özdemir, M.E.; Set, E.; Sarıkaya, M.Z. Some new Hadamard’s type inequalities for co-ordinated m-convex and (α,m)-convex functions. Hacettepe J. Math. Stat. 2011, 40, 219–229. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sarıkaya, M.Z.; Set, E.; Özdemir, M.E.; Dragomir, S.S. New some Hadamard’s type inequalities for co-ordinated convex functions. Tamsui Oxf. J. Math. Sci. 2012, 28, 137–152. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dragomir, S.S. On Hadamard’s inequality for convex functions on the co-ordinates in a rectangle from the plane. Taiwan. J. Math. 2001, 5, 775–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hwang, D.Y.; Tseng, K.L.; Yang, G.S. Some Hadamard’s inequalities for co-ordinated convex functions in a rectangle from the plane. Taiwan. J. Math. 2007, 11, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Özdemir, M.E.; Kavurmacı, H.; Akdemir, A.O.; Avcı, M. Inequalities for convex and s-convex functions on Δ = [a, b] × [c, d]. J. Inequal. Appl. 2012, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Set, E.; Özdemir, M.E.; Dragomir, S.S. On the Hermite-Hadamard inequality and other integral inequalities involving two functions. J. Inequal. Appl. 2010, 2010, 148102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Akdemir, A.O.; Ekinci, A.; Set, E. Conformable fractional integrals and related new integral inequalities. J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 2017, 18, 661–674. [Google Scholar]
  12. Atangana, A.; Baleanu, D. New fractional derivatives with non-local and non-singular kernel. Theory and Application to Heat Transfer Model. Therm. Sci. 2016, 20, 763–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Dokuyucu, M.A.; Baleanu, D.; Celik, E. Analysis of Keller-Segel model with Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative. Filomat 2018, 32, 5633–5643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Dokuyucu, M.A.; Celik, E.; Bulut, H.; Baskonus, H.M. Cancer treatment model with the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative. Eur. J. Plus 2018, 133, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dokuyucu, M.A.; Dutta, H. A fractional order model for Ebola Virus with the new Caputo fractional derivative without singular kernel. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2020, 134, 109717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhou, S.-S.; Rashid, S.; Parveen, S.; Akdemir, A.O.; Hammouch, Z. New computations for extended weighted functionals within the Hilfer generalized proportional fractional integral operators. AIMS Math. 2021, 6, 4507–4525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Set, E.; Akdemir, A.O.; Özata, F. Grüss type inequalities for fractional integral operator involving the extended generalized Mittag-Leffler function. Appl. Comput. Math. 2020, 19, 402–414. [Google Scholar]
  18. Farid, G.; Rehman, A.U.; Tariq, B.; Waheed, A. On Hadamard type inequalities for m-convex functions via fractional integrals. J. Inequal. Spec. Funct. 2016, 7, 150–167. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jarad, F.; Abdeljawad, T. Generalized fractional derivatives and Laplace transform. Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst. 2020, 13, 709–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Jarad, F.; Abdeljawad, T.; Alzabut, J. Generalized fractional derivatives generated by a class of local proportional derivatives. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2017, 226, 3457–3471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jarad, F.; Abdeljawad, T.; Baleanu, D. On the generalized fractional derivatives and their Caputo modification. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2017, 10, 2607–2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Butt, S.I.; Umar, M.; Rashid, S.; Akdemir, A.O.; Chu, Y.M. New Hermite Jensen Mercer-type inequalities via k-fractional integrals. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020, 2020, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Katugampola, U.N. New approach to a generalized fractional integral. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 218, 860–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Katugampola, U.N. A new approach to a generalized fractional derivatives. Bull. Math. Anal. Appl. 2014, 6, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  25. Nie, D.; Rashid, S.; Akdemir, A.O.; Baleanu, D.; Liu, J.-B. On some new weighted inequalities for differentiable exponentially convex and exponentially quasi-convex functions with applications. Mathematics 2019, 7, 727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Set, E. New inequalities of Ostrowski type for mappings whose derivatives are s-convex in the second sense via fractional integrals. Comput. Math. Appl. 2012, 63, 1147–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Set, E.; Akdemir, A.O.; Mumcu, I. Chebyshev type inequalities for conformable fractional integrals. Miskolc Math. Notes 2019, 20, 1227–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, H.; Katugampola, U.N. Hermite-Hadamard and Hermite-Hadamar-Fejer type inequalityies for generalized fractional integrals. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2013, 26, 742–753. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sarikaya, M.Z.; Set, E.; Yaldiz, H.; Basak, N. Hermite-Hadamards inequalities for fractional integrals and related fractional inequalities. Math. Comput. Model. 2013, 57, 2403–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ekinci, A.; Ozdemir, M.E. Some New Integral Inequalities via Riemann Liouville Integral Operators. Appl. Comput. Math. 2019, 3, 288–295. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sarikaya, M.Z.; Yildirim, H. On Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for Riemann Liouville fractional integrals. Miskolc Math. Notes 2016, 17, 1049–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Samko, S.G.; Kilbas, A.A.; Marichev, O.I. Fractional Integral and Derivatives, Theory and Applications; Gordon and Breach: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kilbas, A.A.; Strivastava, H.M.; Trujillo, J.J. Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, 1st ed.; Elsevier B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  34. Baleanu, D.; Fernandez, A.; Akgul, A. On a fractional operator combining proportional and classical differintegrals. Mathematics 2020, 8, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Anderson, D.R.; Ulness, D.J. Newly defined conformable derivatives. Adv. Dyn. Syst. Appl. 2015, 10, 109–137. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gürbüz, M.; Akdemir, A.O.; Dokuyucu, M.A. Novel Approaches for Differentiable Convex Functions via the Proportional Caputo-Hybrid Operators. Fractal Fract. 2022, 6, 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6050258

AMA Style

Gürbüz M, Akdemir AO, Dokuyucu MA. Novel Approaches for Differentiable Convex Functions via the Proportional Caputo-Hybrid Operators. Fractal and Fractional. 2022; 6(5):258. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6050258

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gürbüz, Mustafa, Ahmet Ocak Akdemir, and Mustafa Ali Dokuyucu. 2022. "Novel Approaches for Differentiable Convex Functions via the Proportional Caputo-Hybrid Operators" Fractal and Fractional 6, no. 5: 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6050258

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop