Next Article in Journal
Unusual presentation of bilateral inferior shoulder dislocation following a trivial fall in an elderly female: a case report
Previous Article in Journal
A multicentre survey on the sociodemographic characteristics of Italian elderly inmates
 
 
Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics is published by MDPI from Volume 74 Issue 1 (2026). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Pacini Editore.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Factors influencing stroke patient adherence to physical activity: a systematic review

by
Fairuz Tasnim Dahlan Tabah
1,
Fatimah Sham
2,4,
Fatin Nadzirah Zakaria
3,4,
Nina Keterina Hashim
3,4 and
Razif Dasiman
3,4,*
1
Centre for Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
2
Centre for Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
3
Maternofetal and Embryo Research Group (MatE), Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia
4
Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2020, 68(3), 174-179; https://doi.org/10.36150/2499-6564-389
Submission received: 9 October 2019 / Accepted: 3 March 2020 / Published: 15 July 2020

Background

Stroke leads to physical problems, commonly paralysis, cognitive, sensory, perceptual and communication problem. Physical inactivity among stroke patients is high in the acute and chronic stage. The adherence of them towards exercise and rehabilitation therapy declined after discharge, thus lead to poor outcomes of recovery.

Objective

To review the literature on the factors that influence stroke patients’ adherence to physical activity (PA) and to identify the intrapersonal, interpersonal and environmental factors that affect the adherence of stroke patients’ towards PA.

Methods

Four electronic databases (EBSCO: CINAHL Plus with Full text, Willey Online Library, and ScienceDirect) from 2008 to 2019 reporting any factors that affecting stroke people participate in the physical activity. The methodological quality of the studies was appraised using McMaster critical appraisal tools and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used for online searching strategy.

Results

10 articles met the inclusion criteria. The intrapersonal factors include physical impairment, balance, and mobility, fear of fall, aging, forgetful, reduce in self-efficacy and exercise benefits. Interpersonal factors were social support, lack of attendant and support from healthcare, physiotherapist or gym trainer. Economic factors, transportation, and exercise facility were the environmental factors that influence stroke patient adherence to PA.

Conclusions

These three factors were interrelated to change the individual perception towards exercise among stroke patients. This review enables the development of an intervention to improve participation in PA among stroke patients.
Key words:
stroke; physical activity; rehabilitation; adherence; factors; barrier

INTRODUCTION

Every year approximately 795,000 people experience a new or recurrent stroke and approximately 610,000 are first attacks while 185,000 are recurrent attacks 1. Considering stroke separately with other cardiovascular diseases, stroke ranks fifth among all causes of death after diseases of heart, cancer, chronic lower respiratory disease and unintentional injuries or accident 2. Physical activity (PA) has various benefits along the lifespan and one of the most basic human functions. It is well established that has led to a low level of risk factor for a first stroke attack and low level of PA has the risk for recurrent stroke events as it can be reduced by 20% with the PA 3.
Physical inactivity among stroke is still high in the acute and chronic stage. Estimated that community-dwelling stroke survivors spent only one to two hours of standing or walking per day 4. Physical inactivity lead to the reduction in aerobic fitness causing the cardiovascular capacity of the stroke survivor below the level needed to perform activities daily living (ADL) 5. Stroke survivor with a mean age of 71.3 years old reported to have lower levels of moderate and high activity than expected and even patient with mild stroke only spent 11.3% of walking per day 6. Lack of adherence to the treatment is a problem in a few healthcare profession including physiotherapy 7 and the adherence level among strokes survivor remains the major barrier to the effectiveness of the intervention 8-10. The aim of this study is to review the literature on the factors that influence stroke patients’ adherence to PA and to identify the intrapersonal, interpersonal and environmental factors that affect the adherence of stroke patients’ to PA.

METHODS

SEARCH STRATEGIES

Research was conducted using EBSCO: CINAHL Plus with Full text, Willey Online Library and Science Direct from UiTM PTAR online databases with additional database PUBMED and Google Scholar published from 2008 to 2019. Limit to “English language”, “Full text” and “Academic Journal” was applied to all searches. Following were the keywords used with the Boolean operators: “Stroke, CVA, Hemiplegia, Hemiparesis, Cerebrovascular stroke, adherence, cohesion, compliance, Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness”.

SELECTION OF CRITERIA

This review includes if the participant had stroke and the study discussed factors to participate in PA. Quantitative studies with no limited range of age of the stroke patient were included. Only research with full text and English language from 2008 to 2019 were selected. Qualitative study and review article were excluded.

QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF THE STUDY

Study methodological quality was evaluated using McMaster critical appraisal tools (CAT) 11. The McMaster CAT were chosen because of their generic nature that applies to all type of quantitative study. Total score for the quantitative study was 14 and obtained by the summation of all items with a higher score indicate good methodological quality.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted from the online searching on the online databases. The studies were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and were screened using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow chart. The data have been extracted according to study design, country of origin, and mean age of the participant in the study, sample size, result and conclusion of the studies.

RESULTS

STUDY CHARACTERISTIC

Figure 1 shows the database search yielded 8505 records of which the 7865 records were excluded on initial application of the inclusion criteria to the title and abstract. 57 articles obtained in full text and 48 articles were subsequently excluded as they did not meet the selection criteria. 10 quantitative studies were included in this review. Eight of the studies were cross-sectional study while two studies were randomized control trial (RCT). The 10 studies provided data on 815 stroke survivors ranging from 7 to 207 participant of each study. The average age of participant ranged from 52.87 years old to 72.4 years old. The origin of the selected studies was from Chicago, Canada, India, Nigeria, Ghana, England, United Kingdom, and Australia. Two studies focus on community-based PA 12,13, two studies on home-based exercise 14,15, three studies on clinical based exercise 9,16,17 and four studies focusing on general PA 9,16,18. The mean score for McMaster was 9.20. The articles score range from 8/14 to the highest 11/14. The standard deviation was 0.92 while the variance was 0.84.

DISCUSSION

INTRAPERSONAL FACTORS

This review identified several physical health-related factors that influence stroke patients’ adherence to PA as shown in Table I. Musculoskeletal (MS) issues prevent stroke survivor from participating in community-dwelling exercise and the pain during exercise may come from fatigue or overexertion due to spasticity. Pain as one of the factors that influence the home-based exercise 19 with contrast to a study that reported pain was not significantly affecting the home-based exercise adherence 20.
Fatigue is a complication after stroke. The frequency of fatigue among stroke patient is between 35 to 92% and can be a persistent symptom for at least 36 months post stroke 21. Fatigue is an important clinical reason of a progressive way of reducing the PA or the physical fitness. These required them to put extra effort to perform any physical task. To prevent difficulty performing exercise due to physical health-related factors, the exercise prescription should be given in appropriate amount and beneficial to the patient.
Balance is an important factor for stroke survivors to participate in PA because walking was the most common identified exercise among them 22. Three studies reported that the mobility impairment causing the reduction in PA participation among the stroke people 23 and older adult 24. Self-efficacy can be the most common factors associated with the reduced level of PA. This finding is similar to the previous study that found reduce in self-efficacy as a factor for not exercise among post-stroke 25. A meta-analysis study found that most of them have a lack of confidence to control their body ability 26.
Aging followed by the reduction of the outcome become the barrier to exercise. In the West European country, half of the citizen perform minimum two hours and 30 minutes per week of moderate PA 27. The number reduces with 10% after the age of 75 years old. Similarly, the trend of participation in PA in other European 28 and non-European countries 29. The trend continues with decline in PA after the age of 80 years old.
Forgetfulness of patient to perform the exercise or joining PA may due to the effect of medications taken by patient that leads to confusion 30. Remind their family members or relative about the appointment date and exercise through any possible medium could help to overcome this factor. Exercise benefits motivate the participant to continually engage with treadmill exercise after stroke 31. Knowing exercise is good for health and to become fitter act as the reasons for stroke survivors to start exercise 32.

INTERPERSONAL FACTORS

Lack of social support was perceived barrier to PA among stroke patient. Social support come from families, spouse and healthcare provider 31. Family support shown to motivate stroke patient to participate in PA. Female more depending on male family members for the support in their life especially on health concern and suffer if their supporter does not cooperate to support them 34. Common effect of stroke was hemiplegia, thus stroke survivors need to be physically dependent to perform any ADL including exercise 15. Thus, lack of attendant was identified as a factor stroke survivors to refuse from joining the community-based exercise 12. Family support is an important factor which the stroke survivor not being to emphasize. Getting too much support from the family member cause the strokes survivors to have difficulty in performing ADL 35. The family members may undergoes stress to provide enough support for stroke survivors 16. Verbal and positive encouragement from the staff able to motivate the older adult with ischemic stroke to believe the benefits of exercise and encourage participants to exercise 31. It is by providing information about the exercises to be done, safety and comfort and also provide external motivation to facilitate the participation to exercise 36. A consistence result was found among the post-stroke population with a community exercise program after discharge from rehabilitation 37. An instructor who able to monitor and supervise them during the exercise session and must be knowledgeable about prescribing the exercise for post-stroke is also needed 37. Good interaction between both parties is another potential motivating factor 36.

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS

Living status of an individual affects their health care and hospital services 38. In these cases, a self-employed person or come from lucrative family may be able to pay for physiotherapy and join community exercise for a longer duration. The stroke results in physical disable and they have to rely on their family and friends for financial support 39. Transportation barrier reduce the engagement of physical activities outside the house. Most of the stroke survivors took cab to hospital although it was expensive 39. More public transport with easily access by disable people such as buses should be done to improve their participation to PA. As the transportation burden to the person, emphasise on home-based exercise is the best way to improve their participation in PA.
Exercise facilities barrier hinder the individual with neurological condition to participate in PA 40. The difficulty in accessing the facilities as some equipment not always be perceived as safe or suitable for them and may limits their mobility 40. An action in order to improve the exercise facilities among the disable people need to be done to increase the PA level among them. It takes time to build an environment that aligns with social attitude in any country.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrapersonal factors have found to be the most common factors that determined stroke patient to engage in physical activity followed by the interpersonal factors. There was less research available regarding the environmental factors among the stroke survivors. The barriers to physical activity can arise from more than one factors such as the intrapersonal factors combined with interpersonal factors it changes the individual perception towards exercise. These factors can be linked together to explained the rate of adherence to physical activity among stroke patient.

Figures and tables

Figure 1. PRISMA flow-chart of search strategies.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow-chart of search strategies.
Jgg 68 00174 g001
Table I. Factors influencing stroke patient adherence to PA and McMaster CAT score.
Table I. Factors influencing stroke patient adherence to PA and McMaster CAT score.
13Don’t know how to exercise
Lack of energy
Lack of motivation
Exercise won’t improve condition
Health concerns prevent from exercising
Exercise too difficult
Exercise is boring
Lack of interest
Lack of time
Don’t feel trainer in the facility is able to helpCost of program
Lack of transportation
Not aware of the fitness center in the area
Don’t know where to exercise
Not comfortable in exercising in a facility
10/14
14Improve functional
Desire to improve the overall health
Enhance confidence
Lack of motivation
Exercise reduces MS issues
Fatigue
MS issue prevent from exercise
Family support
Family obligation
10/14
9Mobility
Balance
Fear of fall
9/14
12Don’t know how to exercise
Health concerns prevents me from exercising
Pain that prevents me from exercise
Lack of energy
I am too old to exercise
Lack of attendantLack of transportation
Lack of accessible facility
Don’t know where to exercise
8/14
15Tiredness
Exercise is difficult
Pain
Exercise is not part of daily routine
Forgetfulness
Need physical assistance
Exercise is important with therapist
9/14
8Forgetfulness
Fatigue
Pain
Lacked of accompany to hospitalFinancial constraint11/14
16Being embarrassed to exerciseAccess to facilities
Economic cost demand of exercise
8/14
17Financial
Transport
10/14
33Exercise good for
health
To become fitter
To feel in good shape mentally and physically
Poor health
Too Tired
Might get injured or damage health
Self-efficacy
9/14
18Mobility level
Pain
Fatigue
Fear of fall self-efficacy
Social supportTransport9/14

References

  1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Brown T, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics-2010 update: a report from the american heart association. Circulation 2010;121:45. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192666. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192666
  2. Chamberlain AM. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2019 update. A report from the American Heart Association, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659
  3. Hackam DG, Spence JD. Combining multiple approaches for the secondary: a quantitative modeling study. Stroke 2007:1881-5. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20130175. 10.2522/ptj.20130175
  4. English C, Manns PJ, Tucak C. Physical activity and sedentary behaviors in people with stroke living in the community: a systematic review. Physical therapy 2014;94:185-96. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20130175. 10.2522/ptj.20130175
  5. Macko RF, Ivey FM, Forrester LW, et al. Chronic stroke a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke 2005;36:2206-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2008.11.006. 10.1016/j.physio.2008.11.006
  6. Bernhardt J, Dewey H, Thrift A, et al. Inactive and alone. Stroke 2004;35:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000120727.40792.40. 10.1161/01.STR.0000120727.40792.40
  7. Vasey LM. DNAs and DNCTs – Why do patients fail to begin or to complete a course of physiotherapy treatment? Physiother (United Kingdom) 1990;76:575-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(10)63052-0. 10.1016/S0031-9406(10)63052-0
  8. Ogwumike O, Badaru U, Adeniyi A. Barriers to treatment adherence among stroke survivors attending outpatient physiotherapy clinics in North-Western Nigeria. Clinical Health Promotion 2015;5:4-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2008.11.006. 10.1016/j.physio.2008.11.006
  9. Tiedemann A, Sherrington C, Dean CM, et al. Predictors of adherence to a structured exercise program and physical activity participation in community dwellers after stroke. Stroke Res Treat 2012;2012:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/136525. 10.1155/2012/136525
  10. Yao M, Chen J, Jing J, et al. Defining the rehabilitation adherence curve and adherence phases of stroke patients: an observational study. Patient Prefer. Adherence 2017;11:1435-41. https://dx.doi.org/10.2147%2FPPA.S139854. 10.2147/2FPPA.S139854
  11. Law M, Stewart D, Pollock N, et al. Critical review form – Quantitative studies. McMaster University occupational therapy evidence-based practice research Group. 1998;1998:1-3.
  12. Akhtar MU, Arora S, Mehndiratta MM. Barriers associated with community access by stroke patients in Indian population. Indian J Physiother Occup Ther 2013;7:260-5. https://doi.org/10.5958/j.0973-5674.7.3.104. 10.5958/j.0973-5674.7.3.104
  13. Rimmer J, Edward W, Donald S. Barrier associated with exercise and community access for individuals with stroke. J Rehab Res Develop 2008;45:315-22. https://doi.org/10.1682/jrrd.2007.02.0042. 10.1682/jrrd.2007.02.0042
  14. Jurkiewicz MT, Marzolini S, Oh P. Adherence to a home-based exercise program for individuals after stroke. Topics Stroke Rehab 2011;18:277-84. https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1803-277. 10.1310/tsr1803-277
  15. Ogwumike O, Badaru U, Adeniyi A. Factors influencing adherence to home-based exercise by stroke survivors in North Western Nigeria. Int J Ther Rehabil Res 2014;3:8. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijtrr.00000023. 10.5455/ijtrr.00000023
  16. Idowu AO, Adeniyi AF, Ogwumike OO, et al. Perceived barriers to physical activity among Nigerian stroke survivors. Int J Clin Med 2015;8688:1-8. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2015.21.274.6669. 10.11604/pamj.2015.21.274.6669
  17. Nketia-Kyere M, Aryeetey GC, Nonvignon J, et al. Exploring barriers to accessing physiotherapy services for stroke patients at Tema general hospital, Ghana. Arch Physiother 2017;7:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-017-0037-5. 10.1186/s40945-017-0037-5
  18. Jackson S, Mercer C, Singer BJ. An exploration of factors influencing physical activity levels amongst a cohort of people living in the community after stroke in the south of England. Disabil Rehabil 2018;40:414-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1258437. 10.1080/09638288.2016.1258437
  19. Miller K. Adherence with home exercise programs 1-6 months after discharge from physical therapy by individuals post-stroke. Stroke 2009;40:1-64.
  20. Sluijs EM, Kok GJ, van der Zee J. Correlates of exercise compliance in physical therapy. Phys Ther 1993;73:771-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/73.11.771. 10.1093/ptj/73.11.771
  21. Duncan F, Kutlubaev MA, Dennis MS, et al. Fatigue after stroke: a systematic review of associations with impaired physical fitness. Int J Stroke 2012;7:157-62. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1747-4949.2011.00741.x. 10.1111/2Fj.1747-4949.2011.00741.x
  22. Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Tawashy AE, et al. Exercise perceptions among people with stroke: barriers and facilitators to participation. Int J Ther Rehabil 2011;18:520-30. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2011.18.9.520. 10.12968/ijtr.2011.18.9.520
  23. Damush TM, Plue L, Bakas T, et al. Barriers and facilitators to exercise among stroke survivors. Rehabil Nurs 2007;32:253-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2048-7940.2007.tb00183.x. 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2007.tb00183.x
  24. Ashe MC, Eng JJ, Miller WC, et al. Disparity between physical capacity and participation in seniors with chronic disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007;39:1139-46. https://dx.doi.org/10.1249%2Fmss.0b013e31804d2417. 10.1249/2Fmss.0b013e31804d2417
  25. Shaughnessy M, Resnick CBM, Macko CRF. Testing a model of post-stroke exercise behavior Rehab Nurs 2006;31:15-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2048-7940.2006.tb00005.x. 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2006.tb00005.x
  26. Salter K, Hellings C, Foley N, et al. The experience of living with stroke: a qualitative meta-synthesis. J Rehabil Med 2008;40;595-602. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0238. 10.2340/16501977-0238
  27. Baert V, Gorus E, Mets T, et al. Motivators and barriers for physical activity in the oldest old: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev 2011;10:464-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2011.04.001. 10.1016/j.arr.2011.04.001
  28. Retten A, Abu-Omar K. Prevalence of physical activity in the European Union. Soc Prev Med 2004;49:281-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-004-3100-4. 10.1007/s00038-004-3100-4
  29. Ewald B, Duke J, Thakkinstian A, et al. Physical activity of older Australians measured by pedometry. Aust J Ageing 2009;28:127-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00372.x. 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00372.x
  30. Killaspy H, Banerjee S, King M, et al. Prospective controlled study of psychiatric out-patient non-attendance. Br J Psychiatry 2000;176:160-5. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.176.2.160. 10.1192/bjp.176.2.160
  31. Resnick B, Michael K, Shaughnessy M, et al. Motivators for treadmill exercise after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2008;15:494-502. https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1505-494. 10.1310/tsr1505-494
  32. Payne A, Greig C, Young A, et al. Views of stroke patients on physical fi tness training. Topics Stroke Rehab 2001;18:277-84. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/30.5.429. 10.1093/ageing/30.5.429
  33. Nicholson SL, Donaghy M, Johnston M, et al. Quantitative data analysis of perceived barriers and motivators to physical activity in stroke survivors. Disability Rehab 2017;47:231-6. https://doi.org/10.4997/JRCPE.2017.304. 10.4997/JRCPE.2017.304
  34. Basri R. Factors affecting compliances with physiotherapy among stroke patients: physiotherapist’s perspective: a study from Peshawar Pakistan. Pakistan J Neurol Sci 2017;12:26-31.
  35. Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Côté R, et al. Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83;1035-42. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.33984. 10.1053/apmr.2002.33984
  36. Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Tawashy AE. Exercise perceptions among people with stroke: barriers and facilitators to participation. Int J Ther Rehabil 2011;18:20-530. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2011.18.9.520. 10.12968/ijtr.2011.18.9.520
  37. Wiles R, Demain S, Robison J, et al. Exercise on prescription schemes for stroke patients post-discharge from physiotherapy. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:1966-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701772997. 10.1080/09638280701772997
  38. McNamara A, Normand C, Whelan B. Patterns and determinants of health care utilisation in Ireland. Tilda Healt Care Utilisation Report 2013;2:1-34.
  39. Olaleye O, Suddick K. A study of perceived factors affecting patients’ participation in outpatient stroke physiotherapy exercise in Nigeria. Int J Ther Rehab 2012;19:581-90. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2012.19.10.581. 10.12968/ijtr.2012.19.10.581
  40. Hilda M, Leigh H, Whitehead L, et al. Barriers to physical activity for people with long-term neurological conditions: a review study. Adapt Phys Act Q 2012; 29:243-65. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.29.3.243. 10.1123/apaq.29.3.243

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tabah, F.T.D.; Sham, F.; Zakaria, F.N.; Hashim, N.K.; Dasiman, R. Factors influencing stroke patient adherence to physical activity: a systematic review. J. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2020, 68, 174-179. https://doi.org/10.36150/2499-6564-389

AMA Style

Tabah FTD, Sham F, Zakaria FN, Hashim NK, Dasiman R. Factors influencing stroke patient adherence to physical activity: a systematic review. Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2020; 68(3):174-179. https://doi.org/10.36150/2499-6564-389

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tabah, Fairuz Tasnim Dahlan, Fatimah Sham, Fatin Nadzirah Zakaria, Nina Keterina Hashim, and Razif Dasiman. 2020. "Factors influencing stroke patient adherence to physical activity: a systematic review" Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics 68, no. 3: 174-179. https://doi.org/10.36150/2499-6564-389

APA Style

Tabah, F. T. D., Sham, F., Zakaria, F. N., Hashim, N. K., & Dasiman, R. (2020). Factors influencing stroke patient adherence to physical activity: a systematic review. Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 68(3), 174-179. https://doi.org/10.36150/2499-6564-389

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop