Next Article in Journal
An Epidemiological Survey of Intestinal Parasitic Infection and the Socioeconomic Status of the Ethnic Minority People of Moken and Orang Laut
Previous Article in Journal
Why Some People Are Hesitant to Receive COVID-19 Boosters: A Systematic Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
TropicalMed
Volume 8
Issue 3
10.3390/tropicalmed8030160
tropicalmed-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Production and Immunological Characterization of scFv Specific to Epitope of Opisthorchis viverrini Rhophilin-Associated Tail Protein 1-like (OvROPN1L)

by
Amornrat Geadkaew-Krenc
1,2,*,
Dawid Krenc
3,
Jeeraphong Thanongsaksrikul
1,
Rudi Grams
1,2,
Wansika Phadungsil
1,2,
Kittirat Glab-ampai
4,
Pathanin Chantree
5 and
Pongsakorn Martviset
5
1
Graduate Program in Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Thammasat University, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
2
Thammasat University Research Unit in Parasitic Diseases, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
3
Chulabhorn International College of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
4
Center of Research Excellence in Therapeutic Proteins and Antibody Engineering, Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
5
Department of Preclinical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8(3), 160; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8030160
Submission received: 7 February 2023 / Revised: 2 March 2023 / Accepted: 4 March 2023 / Published: 6 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Neglected and Emerging Tropical Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
(1) Background: Opisthorchis viverrini is a significant health problem in the Mekong subregion of Southeast Asia, causing aggressive cholangiocarcinoma. Current diagnostic procedures do not cover early diagnosis and low infection. Hence, an effective diagnostic tool is still required. Immunodiagnosis seems promising, but attempts to generate monoclonal antibodies have not yet been successful. This study aims to develop a single-chain variable antibody fragment (scFv) against Rhophilin-associated tail protein 1-like (ROPN1L), the sperm-specific antigen of adult O. viverrini, which has not been reported elsewhere. (2) Methods: The target epitope for phage screening was L3-Q13 of OvROPN1L, which showed the highest antigenicity to human opisthorchiasis analyzed in a previous study. This peptide was commercially synthesized and used for phage library screening. The isolated phage was produced in a bacterial expression system and tested for specificity in vitro and in silico. (3) Results: One of fourteen phages, named scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19, significantly bound to rOvROPN1L compared with non-infected hamster fecal extracts. This phage clone was successfully produced and purified using Ni-NTA chromatography. Indirect ELISA demonstrated that scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 has a high reactivity with O. viverrini-infected hamster fecal extracts (12 wpi, n = 6) in comparison with non-infected hamster fecal extracts (0 wpi, n = 6), while the polyclonal rOvROPN1L antibodies did not show such a difference. Molecular modeling and docking confirmed our in vitro findings. (4) Conclusion: scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 could be used as an effective material for developing O. viverrini-immunodiagnostic procedures in the future.

1. Introduction

Opisthorchis viverrini (O. viverrini), the human liver fluke, is a parasitic pathogen belonging to the family Opisthochiidae, together with two other known parasitic flatworms, Opisthorchis felineus and Clonorchis sinensis. Opisthorchis viverrini occurs throughout the Mekong subregion of Southeast Asia, whereas O. felineus is mainly found in Europe and C. sinensis is concentrated in East Asian countries [1,2]. Opisthorchis viverrini infection causes mild to severe symptoms, including abdominal discomfort, fever, jaundice, biliary obstruction, cholangitis, and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) at the end stage [1,3]. The relationship between O. viverrini infection and CCA is highly concerning because CCA is an aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis and a high mortality rate [2,4]. For these reasons, early diagnosis is still required to limit severe complications.
The gold standard for diagnosing O. viverrini infection is stool examination using a light microscope with a simple wet smear and formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT) [5,6]. However, these methods require the professional experience of the investigator to differentiate O. viverrini eggs from other parasite eggs, and they do not enable the diagnosis of light infections with a low level of infection [7,8]. Molecular diagnosis is another possibility; several targets have been reported, such as NADH dehydrogenase (NAD) subunits [9,10,11], internal transcribed spacer (ITS-1 and ITS-2) [12,13], and cytochrome c oxidase 1 (cox1) [13,14]. Various methods have been introduced, such as conventional PCR, qPCR, and LAMP, but the variation in sensitivity and specificity of the target genes is still questionable. Moreover, there are many limitations, such as the instrumental requirement and the price of detection reagents [15,16,17].
Immunodiagnosis is another platform for detecting O. viverrini infection [18,19]. Among the reported targets, proteins in excretory/secretory (ES) products are highly potentiating [19,20,21]. In addition, parasite ES protein detection has been established for serum and urine specimens [22,23,24]. However, methods for detecting ES proteins that mainly comprise enzymes and enzyme inhibitors remain in development due to the stability of detection targets and cross-reactivities as critical factors [24,25]. Proteins in the eggs, especially the eggshell, are another promising target; a glycine–tyrosine-rich eggshell protein (OvESP) has been characterized, but, unfortunately, its sensitivity is varied [26].
Spermatogenesis is one of the most important biological processes in the life cycle of adult O. viverrini inhabiting the host. Previous reports have mentioned that this sperm-associated protein could be used as a detection target for parasitic infection, especially in egg-containing specimens [27,28]. Rhophilin, a RhoA-binding protein, is a sperm-specific protein that is highly expressed in the fibrous sheath of spermatozoa [28,29,30]. In mammals, Rhophilin-1 and its orthologues contain the N-terminal domain, ROPN1, which interacts with A-kinase anchor protein 3 (AKAP3) in both GDP- and GTP-bound RhoA in vitro. ROPN1 binding regulates the actin cytoskeleton by interacting with various downstream molecules [31,32]. Its N-terminal domain is interesting since it is found in only a few proteins [28,33]. The rhophilin-associated tail protein 1-like (ROPN1L) has been molecularly characterized in O. viverrini [34,35]. Its best immunogenicity has been identified at the N-terminal region, L3-Q13, established in the serum of infected animals and humans [34]. Interestingly, as OvROPN1L is expressed in young parasites, starting from 2-week-old juveniles [35], it could be a potential early diagnostic target for O. viverrini infection. As OvROPN1L was found in sperm, a coproantigen could be a source of antigen detection. Therefore, the principal objective of this current study is to produce the single-chain variable fragment (scFv) specifically for OvROPN1L using phage display technology. Moreover, preliminary data on testing the generated scFv with infected and non-infected hamster fecal extracts are provided.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Production of Recombinant Protein OvROPN1L

The recombinant protein OvROPN1L (rOvROPN1L) was produced as described in a previous study [34]. Briefly, the hamsters were infected with O. viverrini metacercariae collected from the naturally infected fish. Mature parasites were collected from the infected hamster livers and bile ducts and used for total RNA isolation in TRIzol. The OvROPN1L cDNA fragment was generated using PCR, inserted into the pGEM-T easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), and subcloned into the pCold™ TF DNA (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan) expression vector. rOvROPN1L was produced in BL21 E. coli as an expression host strain, coupled with trigger factor (TF) fusion protein using terrific broth and isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) induction. rOvROPN1L was purified under native conditions via gravity flow using a Ni-NTA agarose column (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). The TF fusion protein was removed by factor Xa (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The rOvROPN1L concentration was measured using a Bradford protein assay (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA).

2.2. Polyclonal Antibody Production

Anti-rOvROPN1L antibodies were produced in two female BALB/c mice as previously described [36,37]. At 6 to 8 weeks of age, the mice were immunized at 2-week intervals via three intraperitoneal injections. Pre-immunization sera were collected a week before the first injection. Purified rOvROPN1L was used as an immunogen (10–20 μg per mouse). The final sera (second-boosted sera) were collected two weeks after the last injection by cardiac puncture. Specific antibody titers were determined using indirect ELISA.

2.3. Preparation of Coproantigens

The coproantigens were prepared from the feces of O. viverrini-infected hamsters, as previously described [38]. Six female-Syrian golden hamsters were infected with 100 O. viverrini metacercariae each via gastric intubation. Feces were collected at 0 and 12 weeks post-infection (wpi) using sterile plastic containers. The feces were resuspended and homogenized with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 (1 g of feces per 3 mL of PB) using a homogenizer (T 10 basic ULTRA-TURRAX®, IKA, Staufen, Germany). The homogenate was centrifuged at 3300× g, for 10 min, and the supernatant was collected as the coproantigens.

2.4. Immobilization of Antigens

The target OvROPN1L peptide, consisting of L3-Q13 (LVNDPYYCHEQ), was selected from our previous study [34]. This peptide was synthesized and conjugated with biotin at the N-terminus by ChinaPeptides (Shanghai, China). The synthesized peptide was dissolved in PBS at pH 7.4 to a final concentration of 2 µg/mL. Thirty micrograms of streptavidin magnetic beads (Pierce™ Streptavidin Magnetic Beads, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) were washed three times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 (PBS-T) using DynaMag™-Spin Magnet (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA) to separate the beads. Then, the beads were mixed with PBS containing 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and incubated on a rotator at 25 °C for 1 h to block the empty surfaces. The beads were washed three times with PBS-T and collected using the DynaMag Spin. As indicated in the instruction manual, the maximum binding capacity of 30 µg streptavidin magnetic beads is approximately 6.6 × 1012 molecules of biotinylated antigen. The beads were subsequently mixed with 1 µg OvROPN1L peptide dissolved in 500 µL PBS (approximately 4.36 × 1014 molecules) and incubated at 25 °C for 12 h on a rotator to immobilize the antigen on the streptavidin magnetic beads. The excess peptides were removed by washing the beads three times with PBS-T 0.05%. The antigen-bound beads were magnetically separated, resuspended in PBS, and maintained at 4 °C before use in the biopanning step. The ratio of peptide to streptavidin magnetic beads and the immobilization conditions of the antigen were derived via optimization.
For subtraction of nonspecific binders, 5 µg of non-infected hamster fecal extract (coproantigens at 0 wpi) and biotin (BAC-SulfoNHS, Sigma Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) were separately mixed with carbonate coating buffer (pH 9.6) in a final volume of 100 μL, coated in wells of an ELISA plate, and incubated at 37 °C for overnight until dry. The wells were washed three times with PBS-T and blocked with 3% BSA in PBS at 37 °C, for 1 h, in a moisture chamber. Excess antigens were removed by washing with PBS-T. The wells were filled with PBS and kept at 4 °C before use in the biopanning step.

2.5. Biopanning

In this study, a library of bacteriophages (phages) displaying a repertoire of naïve mouse single-chain variable fragment (scFv) antibodies, previously constructed and described [39], was used to select scFv antibodies specific to the OvROPN1L peptide. The scFv-phage library had approximately 1.3 × 108 antibody diversity and ~1.4 × 1012 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL. The input amounts of scFv phages were approximately 107 CFU. Firstly, scFv phages that bound nonspecific antigens were absorbed from the input antibody library via incubation with non-infected hamster fecal extract and biotin. Then, the unbound library was selected for parasitic peptide-bound scFv phages by incubating with peptide-bound magnetic beads at 25 °C for 1 h on a rotator. The unbound phages were washed out with PBS-T and eliminated using magnetic separation. The parasitic peptide-bound scFv phages were eluted from the magnetic beads and allowed to infect log-phase XL-1 Blue E. coli, which was used to select transformed bacterial colonies harboring recombinant phagemids, carrying the scfv inserted sequences by PCR, as previously described [39]. Monoclonal scFv phages were produced from the selected bacterial clones, and the titers of the rescued scFv phages were determined and normalized using CFU count [39].

2.6. Screening of the scFv Phages Binding with Full-Length rOvROPN1L and Non-Infected Coproantigen

Indirect ELISA was used to determine the antigen-binding ability of the rescued scFv phages. One microgram of rOvROPN1L and non-infected hamster fecal extract (0 wpi) was mixed (1:5 dilution in coating buffer) with carbonate–bicarbonate coating buffer (pH 9.6), coated in the wells of an ELISA plate, and incubated at 37 °C overnight until dry. Afterwards, the wells were washed three times with PBS-T and incubated with 3% BSA in PBS at 37 °C for 1 h. Individual scFv-phage clones were normalized to 108 CFU via dilution with PBS-T and incubation with antigen-coated wells at 37 °C for 1 h. The wells were incubated with an anti-rOvROPN1L antibody (1:512,000 dilution), LB broth, and M13KO7 wild-type phages that served as positive, background, and negative controls, respectively. The wells were washed five times with PBS-T to remove excess contents. Then, wells of the tests and background and negative controls were mixed with a 1:6000 diluted mouse anti-M13 antibody solution (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). Finally, wells of tests and all controls were mixed with 1:5000 diluted goat anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL, USA), followed by ABTS substrate (SeraCare, Milford, MA, USA). The scFv phages that yielded OD450 nm values with the recombinant protein that were at least twice as significant as the background controls were selected.

2.7. Production of Soluble Anti-OvROPN1L scFv Antibody

The soluble scFv was produced by subcloning the scfv coding sequence of the selected clone from the pSEX81 phagemid into the pOPE101 plasmid (Progen Biotechnik GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) via NotI/NcoI restriction sites, as previously described [39]. The coding sequence of the inserted scFv was verified by DNA sequencing and predicted for the complementarity determining regions (CDRs) and immunoglobulin framework regions (FRs) by the IMGT/V-QUEST tool (the International ImMunoGeneTics Information System, IMGT®, Montpellier, France) [40]. Verified recombinant plasmids were introduced into XL-1 Blue E. coli using a heat-shock method. Soluble scFv was produced in the transformed E. coli grown under isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) induction and purified using Ni–NTA affinity chromatography under denaturing conditions, then step-wise dialyzed in Urea-PBS buffer.
The purified soluble scFv was verified via Western blot analysis using mouse monoclonal anti-c-Myc (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). The antigen–antibody immune complexes were detected using a goat anti-mouse alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antibody (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL, USA), followed by BCIP/NBT (SeraCare, Milford, MA, USA).

2.8. Binding Assessment of Anti-OvROPN1L scFv Antibody with Coproantigens

The soluble scFv anti-OvROPN1L and anti-OvROPN1L antibodies were tested with coproantigens from the O. viverrini-infected hamster feces at 0 and 12 weeks post-infection (wpi), n = 6, by indirect ELISA, as described in the previous section.

2.9. Molecular Modeling and Docking

The deduced amino acid sequences of the generated scFv and OvROPN1L were individually submitted online at AlphaFold2 [41] to model the 3D structure of each protein. Both models were docked with the free online server HADDOCK version 2.4 [42]. The best-docked model was selected using the HADDOCK and PRODICGY webservers [43,44] and the interaction was analyzed using the Discovery Studio Visualizer 2021, version 21.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

The statistics of the indirect ELISA results, as shown in Figure 1 and Figure 3, were evaluated using a two-way ANOVA and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, respectively, in GraphPad Prism 9.5. Two-way ANOVA was used to estimate the means of absorbance values from two independent groups (testing with rOvROPN1L and non-infected fecal extract, Figure 1). The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test was used for non-parametric values to test for the difference in the median of absolute/relative absorbance values from the matched samples (0 and 12 wpi samples are from the same hamsters).

3. Results

3.1. scFv Phages Specifically Bound to Recombinant OvROPN1L

Phage library screening yielded fourteen XL1-blue E. coli clones carrying phagemids with scFv inserts detected using direct colony PCR. The progenies of scFv phages were isolated, rescued, and tested for binding to the rOvROPN1L. Pooled non-infected fecal extract (coproantigen at 0 wpi, n = 6) was a background control, M13KO7 wild-type phage was a negative control, and mouse anti-rOvROPN1L antibody was a positive control. All clones of scFv phages and M13KO7 wild-type phages were normalized based on the same CFU. Among the fourteen clones, the results demonstrate that only one clone, clone no. 19, is significantly bound to rOvROPN1L, compared with non-infected fecal extract (Figure 1). In contrast, the mouse anti-rOvROPN1L antibody strongly reacted with both rOvROPN1L and non-infected fecal extract, indicating that the anti-rOvROPN1L antibody generated a high background in the fecal extract.

3.2. scFv Specific to OvROPN1L Has Been Successfully Cloned

The scFv DNA fragment of clone no. 19 was digested and subcloned into the pOPE101 expression vector. Positive transformants were selected by direct colony PCR, and the DNA was sequenced. The DNA sequence of scFv originating from clone no. 19 against OvROPN1L (scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19) was analyzed for immunoglobulin properties. The results demonstrate that scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 contains a complete variable domain for both heavy-chain (VH) and light-chain (VL) antigen-binding fragments (Figure 2).

3.3. Soluble Recombinant scFv Anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 Was Successfully Produced and Preliminarily Tested against Coproantigens

Soluble scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 was successfully produced and then verified using Western blot detection, as shown in Figure 3a. The predicted molecular weight of scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 was 26–28 kDa.
OvROPN1L detection in 0 and 12 wpi coproantigen solutions with purified soluble scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 was tested via indirect ELISA. As expected, scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 significantly reacted with coproantigens at 12 wpi compared with 0 wpi coproantigens (p = 0.0313), as shown in Figure 3b. In contrast, the anti-rOvROPN1L polyclonal antibody solution showed no significant reactivity difference between 0 and 12 wpi coproantigens (data not shown). The relative absorbance (OD12 wpi/OD0 wpi) of scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 and anti-OvROPN1L antibodies, shown in Figure 3c, indicated a significantly higher specific reactivity of scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 (p = 0.0414).

3.4. Molecular Docking Confirmed the Binding of scFv Anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 and OvROPN1L

The molecular 3D modeling and molecular docking of OvROPN1L and scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 were performed, and the results are shown in Figure 4. These results suggest that the modeled scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 interacts with the modeled OvROPN1L through hydrogen, π-alkyl, and hydrophobic non-covalent bonds and that both the VH and VL domains are involved. The predicted binding free energy (ΔG) and dissociation constant (Kd) were −14.2 kcal mol−1 and 0.039 nM, respectively. The interacting amino acids of OvROPN1L and scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19, as well as the types of molecular interactions, are listed in Table 1.

4. Discussion

Infection caused by the human liver fluke, O. viverrini, is a significant health problem in Mekong sub-region countries. Long-term infection can lead to cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a highly progressive cancer with a poor prognosis and high mortality [2]. Therefore, an effective and practical early diagnosis procedure would be considerably beneficial in terms of public health.
Monoclonal antibodies, MoAbs, are an effective tool for the immunodiagnosis of many diseases, especially infectious diseases. The detection of specific proteins or target molecules with little cross-reactivity is ideal. For O. viverrini infections, several monoclonal antibodies have been developed along with other procedures [9,14,45,46,47]. Most researchers consider secreted antigens in fecal specimens, coproantigens, as the best specimens containing parasite proteins. Excretory/secretory (ES) antigens, such as 89 kDa glycoprotein and 73 kDa protein, were the first target group of monoclonal antibody development as they are continuously released during an infection [46]. Nevertheless, no MoAb is currently solely used in the diagnosis due to MoAbs obtained by different methods showing variable sensitivities. Monoclonal antibody-based ELISA and DNA hybridization methods reportedly show lower or comparative sensitivity to classical parasitological methods [46,48]. In contrast, the sensitivity of the immunoprecipitation method was only 50% with cross-reactivities, as well as known (Clonorchis sinensis) and unknown parasites [49]. The 89 kDa glycoprotein was tested by another group using ELISA, and their results illustrate a sensitivity higher than for immunoprecipitation but comparable to stool examination [50]. MoAb dot ELISA was used with an affinity-purified oval antigen from the adult parasite. The in vitro result had 100% sensitivity, but the obtained MoAb was not tested with natural specimens, such as feces or urine [51].
The study of another specimen, urine, is also being conducted. MoAb has been developed and tested in urine specimens against the parasite ES protein: cysteine protease [52]. The sensitivity of the detection of parasite antigens in urine samples was comparable to stool examination and lower when compared to the FECT method [23,52].
In this study, we generated a MoAb against the sperm-specific antigen, OvROPN1L, an aspect that has not been explored elsewhere. OvROPN1L has potential immunogenicity, as previously reported [34,35]. This is the first report of MoAb production specific to an antigen from O. viverrini sperm. The phage display technology that we used in this study differs from the methods of previous studies that primarily employ a hybridoma technique. Phage display technologies enable the rapid production of MoAb with a high specificity, lower toxicity, and no requirement for antibody-producing animals [53]. Moreover, the scFv-phage library was determined to contain a broad diversity of scFv sequences, from which scFv antibodies to the peptide epitopes located on virion protein 2 of enterovirus A71 and Dia blood group antigen were successfully selected [39,54]. In the current study, the specific reactivity of the selected target epitope for scFv-phage screening was verified in O. viverrini-infected human serums and other helminth-infected human serums [34]. The peptide was then commercially synthesized and used to perform phage library screening. Fortunately, one clone (no. 19) showed a significant detection of recombinant OvROPN1L but lower binding in the non-infected fecal extract. At this stage, it could be demonstrated that phages have no background interference with the binding of the OvROPN1L peptide, as the M13K07 empty phage gave no observable signal. Additionally, the polyclonal anti-rOvROPN1L cannot distinguish between recombinant OvROPN1L and non-infected fecal extract, suggesting that the polyclonal anti-rOvROPN1L cannot be used to detect O. viverrini infections.
scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 has been successfully isolated, subcloned, and produced as a recombinant protein in an E. coli expression system. The scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 fragment in pOPE101 was sequenced and used to predict the VH- and VL-specific domains [40]. The results indicate that scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 contains specific VH and VL sequences. Moreover, the soluble scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 produced from E. coli can specifically recognize recombinant OvROPN1L and distinguish 12 wpi coproantigens (containing OvROPN1L) from 0 wpi coproantigens with statistical significance. Compared with polyclonal antibodies against rOvROPN1L, the scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 demonstrated higher titers. Low signals in the non-infected fecal extract might be caused by the subtractive biopanning that eliminated the non-specific binders from the scFv-phage library. This highlights the utility of the scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19. However, further research is required. Cross-reactivity to other parasites is unlikely, as the epitope OvROPN1L has already been analyzed [34].
Molecular modeling and docking demonstrated that scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 is a complete antigen-binding domain, as it contains both VH and VL. The computerized prediction shows that scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 likely binds OvROPN1L using both the VH and VL regions. The VH region at the CDR1, CDR2, FR1, and FR2 domains interacted with at least seven residues located on the B-cell epitope of OvROPN1L. In contrast, VL had strong binding possibilities in the CR1, CR3, and FR1 domains. This ab initio experiment corroborated the results of the wet experiments.
One limitation of this study is that the generated scFv were not analyzed with other fish-borne parasite-infected feces to verify their specificity and cross-reactivity. However, such experiments are under preparation.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, in the current study, we developed a new monoclonal antibody against OvROPN1L, an O. viverrini sperm-specific antigen, using phage display technology. The scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 is the name of our constructed single-chain monoclonal antibody that can be produced as a soluble recombinant protein in an E. coli expression system. ScFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 can bind OvROPN1L in coproantigen solution with a higher specificity than polyclonal antibodies, showing a low non-specific binding in the non-infected fecal extract. Furthermore, molecular docking strongly suggested the binding of scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 with OvROPN1L. Finally, scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 has significant potential to be developed as a specific early diagnostic tool for O. viverrini infection; however, human specimens are required for the next stage of research.

6. Patents

The scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 generated in this study has been submitted for a patent at the Department of Intellectual Property, Ministry of Commerce, Thailand, with the submission number 2303000219.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G.-K., J.T. and R.G.; methodology, A.G.-K., D.K., J.T., W.P., K.G.-a., P.C. and P.M.; software, A.G.-K., D.K., J.T. and K.G.-a.; validation, A.G.-K., D.K. and J.T.; formal analysis, A.G.-K., D.K., J.T., P.C. and P.M.; investigation, A.G.-K., D.K., J.T., W.P., K.G.-a., P.C. and P.M.; resources, A.G.-K., J.T. and R.G.; data curation, A.G.-K., D.K., J.T. and P.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.G.-K., D.K., J.T. and P.M.; writing—review and editing, A.G.-K., D.K., J.T. and P.M.; visualization, A.G.-K., J.T. and K.G.-a.; supervision, A.G.-K., D.K., R.G., J.T. and P.M.; project administration, A.G.-K. and D.K.; funding acquisition, A.G.-K., D.K., R.G. and W.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Thailand Science Research and Innovation Fundamental Fund and Thammasat University Research Unit in Parasitic Diseases. The APC was funded by Thailand Science Research and Innovation Fundamental Fund and Thammasat University Research Unit in Parasitic Diseases.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Care and Use Committee of Thammasat University (protocol approval no. 024/2559 from 10/04/2017).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Suksiri Vichasri-Grams who devised this study of Rhophilin-associated tail protein (ROPN1L) from the liver fluke Opisthorchis viverrini, as well as Su Thandar Hlaing for technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sripa, B.; Kaewkes, S.; Sithithaworn, P.; Mairiang, E.; Laha, T.; Smout, M.; Pairojkul, C.; Bhudhisawasdi, V.; Tesana, S.; Thinkamrop, B.; et al. Liver Fluke Induces Cholangiocarcinoma. PLoS Med. 2007, 4, e201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sripa, B.; Suwannatrai, A.T.; Sayasone, S.; Do, D.T.; Khieu, V.; Yang, Y. Current status of human liver fluke infections in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Acta Trop. 2021, 224, 106133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sanpool, O.; Aung, W.P.P.; Rodpai, R.; Maleewong, W.; Intapan, P.M. Human liver fluke Opisthorchis viverrini (Trematoda, Opisthorchiidae) in Central Myanmar: New records of adults and metacercariae identified by morphology and molecular analysis. Acta Trop. 2018, 185, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Crellen, T.; Sithithaworn, P.; Pitaksakulrat, O.; Khuntikeo, N.; Medley, G.F.; Hollingsworth, T.D. Towards Evidence-based Control of Opisthorchis viverrini. Trends Parasitol. 2021, 37, 370–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Johansen, M.V.; Sithithaworn, P.; Bergquist, R.; Utzinger, J. Towards improved diagnosis of zoonotic trematode infections in Southeast Asia. Adv. Parasitol. 2010, 73, 171–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Johansen, M.V.; Lier, T.; Sithithaworn, P. Towards improved diagnosis of neglected zoonotic trematodes using a One Health approach. Acta Trop. 2015, 141, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Charoensuk, L.; Subrungruang, I.; Mungthin, M.; Pinlaor, S.; Suwannahitatorn, P. Comparison of stool examination techniques to detect Opisthorchis viverrini in low intensity infection. Acta Trop. 2019, 191, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kopolrat, K.Y.; Singthong, S.; Khuntikeo, N.; Loilome, W.; Worasith, C.; Homwong, C.; Wangboon, C.; Yasaka, P.; Eamudomkarn, C.; Pitaksakulrat, O.; et al. Performance of Mini Parasep(®) SF stool concentrator kit, Kato-Katz, and formalin-ethyl acetate concentration methods for diagnosis of opisthorchiasis in Northeast Thailand. Parasites Vectors 2022, 15, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Phadungsil, W.; Pumpa, S.; Sirisabhabhorn, K.; Geadkaew-Krenc, A.; Grams, R.; Mungthin, M.; Ruang-Areerate, T.; Adisakwattana, P.; Labbunruang, N.; Martviset, P. Efficiency of the Stool-PCR Test Targeting NADH Dehydrogenase (Nad) Subunits for Detection of Opisthorchis viverrini Eggs. J. Trop. Med. 2021, 2021, 3957545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xue, Y.P.; Kao, M.C.; Lan, C.Y. Novel mitochondrial complex I-inhibiting peptides restrain NADH dehydrogenase activity. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kerscher, S.J. Diversity and origin of alternative NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Bioenerg. 2000, 1459, 274–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Buathong, S.; Leelayoova, S.; Mungthin, M.; Ruang-areerate, T.; Naaglor, T.; Suwannahitatorn, P.; Piyaraj, P.; Taamasri, P.; Tan-ariya, P. Molecular discrimination of Opisthorchis-like eggs from residents in a rural community of central Thailand. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0006030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Sahu, R.; Biswal, D.K.; Roy, B.; Tandon, V. Molecular characterization of Opisthorchis noverca (Digenea: Opisthorchiidae) based on nuclear ribosomal ITS2 and mitochondrial COI genes. J. Helminthol. 2016, 90, 607–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pumpa, S.; Phadungsil, W.; Grams, R.; Martviset, P.; Ruang-Areerate, T.; Mungthin, M.; Geadkaew-Krenc, A. Improvement of a PCR-based method for the detection of Opisthorchis viverrini eggs in human stool samples by targeting internal transcribed spacer-2 (ITS-2), cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (cox1), and cytochrome b (cyb). J. Parasit. Dis. 2021, 45, 474–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Buathong, S.; Leelayoova, S.; Mungthin, M.; Naaglor, T.; Taamasri, P.; Suwannahitatorn, P.; Tan-Ariya, P. Development and evaluation of PCR methods based on cytochrome c oxidase subunit one (cox1) and NADH dehydrogenase subunit one gene (nad1) to detect Opisthorchis viverrini in human fecal samples. Parasitol. Res. 2015, 114, 3547–3549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cai, X.Q.; Yu, H.Q.; Li, R.; Yue, Q.Y.; Liu, G.H.; Bai, J.S.; Deng, Y.; Qiu, D.Y.; Zhu, X.Q. Rapid detection and differentiation of Clonorchis sinensis and Opisthorchis viverrini using real-time PCR and high resolution melting analysis. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 893981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Arimatsu, Y.; Kaewkes, S.; Laha, T.; Hong, S.J.; Sripa, B. Rapid detection of Opisthorchis viverrini copro-DNA using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). Parasitol. Int. 2012, 61, 178–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Wongratanacheewin, S.; Sermswan, R.W.; Sirisinha, S. Immunology and molecular biology of Opisthorchis viverrini infection. Acta Trop. 2003, 88, 195–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sirisinha, S.; Chawengkirttikul, R.; Sermswan, R. Immunodiagnosis of opisthorchiasis. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 1991, 22, 179–183. [Google Scholar]
  20. Laha, T.; Sripa, J.; Sripa, B.; Pearson, M.; Tribolet, L.; Kaewkes, S.; Sithithaworn, P.; Brindley, P.J.; Loukas, A. Asparaginyl endopeptidase from the carcinogenic liver fluke, Opisthorchis viverrini, and its potential for serodiagnosis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2008, 12, e49–e59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Teimoori, S.; Arimatsu, Y.; Laha, T.; Kaewkes, S.; Sereerak, P.; Tangkawattana, S.; Brindley, P.J.; Sripa, B. Immunodiagnosis of opisthorchiasis using parasite cathepsin F. Parasitol. Res. 2015, 114, 4571–4578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Akai, P.S.; Pungpak, S.; Chaicumpa, W.; Viroj, K.; Bunnag, D.; Befus, A.D. Serum antibody response to Opisthorchis viverrini antigen as a marker for opisthorchiasis-associated cholangiocarcinoma. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1994, 88, 471–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Worasith, C.; Kamamia, C.; Yakovleva, A.; Duenngai, K.; Wangboon, C.; Sithithaworn, J.; Watwiengkam, N.; Namwat, N.; Techasen, A.; Loilome, W.; et al. Advances in the Diagnosis of Human Opisthorchiasis: Development of Opisthorchis viverrini Antigen Detection in Urine. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0004157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Sadaow, L.; Rodpai, R.; Janwan, P.; Boonroumkaew, P.; Sanpool, O.; Thanchomnang, T.; Yamasaki, H.; Ittiprasert, W.; Mann, V.H.; Brindley, P.J.; et al. An Innovative Test for the Rapid Detection of Specific IgG Antibodies in Human Whole-Blood for the Diagnosis of Opisthorchis viverrini Infection. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sripa, J.; Brindley, P.J.; Sripa, B.; Loukas, A.; Kaewkes, S.; Laha, T. Evaluation of liver fluke recombinant cathepsin B-1 protease as a serodiagnostic antigen for human opisthorchiasis. Parasitol. Int. 2012, 61, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ruangsittichai, J.; Viyanant, V.; Vichasri-Grams, S.; Sobhon, P.; Tesana, S.; Upatham, E.S.; Hofmann, A.; Korge, G.; Grams, R. Opisthorchis viverrini: Identification of a glycine–tyrosine rich eggshell protein and its potential as a diagnostic tool for human opisthorchiasis. Int. J. Parasitol. 2006, 36, 1329–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Goździk, K.; Engström, A.; Höglund, J. Optimization of in-house ELISA based on recombinant major sperm protein (rMSP) of Dictyocaulus viviparus for the detection of lungworm infection in cattle. Res. Vet. Sci. 2012, 93, 813–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Carr, D.W.; Fujita, A.; Stentz, C.L.; Liberty, G.A.; Olson, G.E.; Narumiya, S. Identification of Sperm-specific Proteins That Interact with A-kinase Anchoring Proteins in a Manner Similar to the Type II Regulatory Subunit of PKA*. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 17332–17338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Chen, J.; Wang, Y.; Wei, B.; Lai, Y.; Yan, Q.; Gui, Y.; Cai, Z. Functional expression of ropporin in human testis and ejaculated spermatozoa. J. Androl. 2011, 32, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pelloni, M.; Paoli, D.; Majoli, M.; Pallotti, F.; Carlini, T.; Lenzi, A.; Lombardo, F. Molecular study of human sperm RNA: Ropporin and CABYR in asthenozoospermia. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2018, 41, 781–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Peck, J.W.; Oberst, M.; Bouker, K.B.; Bowden, E.; Burbelo, P.D. The RhoA-binding protein, rhophilin-2, regulates actin cytoskeleton organization. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 43924–43932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Liu, Q.; Huang, X.; Li, Q.; He, L.; Li, S.; Chen, X.; Ouyang, Y.; Wang, X.; Lin, C. Rhophilin-associated tail protein 1 promotes migration and metastasis in triple negative breast cancer via activation of RhoA. Faseb. J. 2020, 34, 9959–9971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fujita, A.; Nakamura, K.; Kato, T.; Watanabe, N.; Ishizaki, T.; Kimura, K.; Mizoguchi, A.; Narumiya, S. Ropporin, a sperm-specific binding protein of rhophilin, that is localized in the fibrous sheath of sperm flagella. J. Cell Sci. 2000, 113, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Geadkaew-Krenc, A.; Grams, R.; Phadungsil, W.; Chaibangyang, W.; Kosa, N.; Adisakwattana, P.; Dekumyoy, P. Evaluation of Rhophilin Associated Tail Protein (ROPN1L) in the Human Liver Fluke Opisthorchis viverrini for Diagnostic Approach. Korean J. Parasitol. 2020, 58, 475–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rattanachan, S.; Grams, R.; Tesana, S.; Smooker, P.M.; Grams, S.V. Opisthorchis viverrini: Analysis of the sperm-specific rhophilin associated tail protein 1-like. Acta Trop. 2014, 140, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Geadkaew, A.; Kosa, N.; Siricoon, S.; Grams, S.V.; Grams, R. A 170kDa multi-domain cystatin of Fasciola gigantica is active in the male reproductive system. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2014, 196, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Martviset, P.; Chantree, P.; Chaimon, S.; Torungkitmangmi, N.; Prathaphan, P.; Ruangtong, J.; Sornchuer, P.; Thongsepee, N.; Sangpairoj, K.; Adisakwattana, P. Molecular Cloning and Characterization of a Fasciola gigantica Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 1 (FgNR1). Pathogens 2022, 11, 1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mazidur Rahman, S.M.; Choi, M.H.; Bae, Y.M.; Hong, S.T. Coproantigen capture ELISA for detection of Clonorchis sinensis infection in experimentally infected rats. Parasitol. Int. 2012, 61, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Thanongsaksrikul, J.; Srimanote, P.; Tongtawe, P.; Glab-Ampai, K.; Malik, A.A.; Supasorn, O.; Chiawwit, P.; Poovorawan, Y.; Chaicumpa, W. Identification and production of mouse scFv to specific epitope of enterovirus-71 virion protein-2 (VP2). Arch. Virol. 2018, 163, 1141–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Giudicelli, V.; Duroux, P.; Kossida, S.; Lefranc, M.-P. IG and TR single chain fragment variable (scFv) sequence analysis: A new advanced functionality of IMGT/V-QUEST and IMGT/HighV-QUEST. BMC Immunol. 2017, 18, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jumper, J.; Evans, R.; Pritzel, A.; Green, T.; Figurnov, M.; Ronneberger, O.; Tunyasuvunakool, K.; Bates, R.; Žídek, A.; Potapenko, A.; et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 2021, 596, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. van Zundert, G.C.P.; Rodrigues, J.; Trellet, M.; Schmitz, C.; Kastritis, P.L.; Karaca, E.; Melquiond, A.S.J.; van Dijk, M.; de Vries, S.J.; Bonvin, A. The HADDOCK2.2 Web Server: User-Friendly Integrative Modeling of Biomolecular Complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 428, 720–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Vangone, A.; Bonvin, A.M. Contacts-based prediction of binding affinity in protein-protein complexes. eLife 2015, 4, e07454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Xue, L.C.; Rodrigues, J.P.; Kastritis, P.L.; Bonvin, A.M.; Vangone, A. PRODIGY: A web server for predicting the binding affinity of protein-protein complexes. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 3676–3678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Phumrattanaprapin, W.; Pearson, M.; Pickering, D.; Tedla, B.; Smout, M.; Chaiyadet, S.; Brindley, P.J.; Loukas, A.; Laha, T. Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting an Opisthorchis viverrini Extracellular Vesicle Tetraspanin Protect Hamsters against Challenge Infection. Vaccines 2021, 9, 740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Sirisinha, S.; Chawengkirttikul, R.; Sermswan, R.; Amornpant, S.; Mongkolsuk, S.; Panyim, S. Detection of Opisthorchis viverrini by Monoclonal Antibody-Based ELISA and DNA Hybridization. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1991, 44, 140–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. BILLINGS, P.B.; UTSAKHIT, N.; SIRISINHA, S. Monoclonal antibodies against Opisthorchis viverrini antigens. Parasite Immunol. 1990, 12, 545–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chaicumpa, W.; Ybanez, L.; Kitikoon, V.; Pungpak, S.; Ruangkunaporn, Y.; Chongsa-nguan, M.; Sornmani, S. Detection of Opisthorchis viverrini antigens in stools using specific monoclonal antibody. Int. J. Parasitol. 1992, 22, 527–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Amornpunt, S.; Sarasombath, S.; Sirisinha, S. Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies against the excretory-secretory antigen of the liver fluke (Opisthorchis viverrini). Int. J. Parasitol. 1991, 21, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sirisinha, S.; Chawengkirttikul, R.; Haswell-Elkins, M.R.; Elkins, D.B.; Kaewkes, S.; Sithithaworn, P. Evaluation of a Monoclonal Antibody-Based Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Diagnosis of Opisthorchis viverrini Infection in an Endemic Area. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1995, 52, 521–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wongsaroj, T.; Sakolvaree, Y.; Chaicumpa, W.; Maleewong, W.; Kitikoon, V.; Tapchaisri, P.; Chongsa-nguan, M.; Cross, J.H. Affinity purified oval antigen for diagnosis of Opisthorchiasis viverrini. Asian Pac. J. Allergy Immunol. 2001, 19, 245–258. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Worasith, C.; Wangboon, C.; Duenngai, K.; Kiatsopit, N.; Kopolrat, K.; Techasen, A.; Sithithaworn, J.; Khuntikeo, N.; Loilome, W.; Namwat, N.; et al. Comparing the performance of urine and copro-antigen detection in evaluating Opisthorchis viverrini infection in communities with different transmission levels in Northeast Thailand. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Smith, G.P. Filamentous fusion phage: Novel expression vectors that display cloned antigens on the virion surface. Science 1985, 228, 1315–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Thattanon, P.; Thanongsaksrikul, J.; Petvises, S.; Nathalang, O. Monoclonal antibody specific to the Di(a) blood group antigen generated by phage display technology. Blood Transfus. 2020, 18, 366–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tropicalmed 08 00160 g001 550
Figure 1. Screening of fourteen Escherichia coli clone-isolated scFv phages with rOvROPN1L and pooled non-infected fecal extract (0 wpi coproantigen) using indirect ELISA. Results are presented as mean ± SD, with the triple asterisks (***) indicating statistical significance (p < 0.001) calculated via two-way ANOVA analysis.
Figure 1. Screening of fourteen Escherichia coli clone-isolated scFv phages with rOvROPN1L and pooled non-infected fecal extract (0 wpi coproantigen) using indirect ELISA. Results are presented as mean ± SD, with the triple asterisks (***) indicating statistical significance (p < 0.001) calculated via two-way ANOVA analysis.
Tropicalmed 08 00160 g001
Tropicalmed 08 00160 g002 550
Figure 2. DNA sequence analysis of scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 from recombinant pOPE101 plasmid. (a) Nucleotide sequence and immunoglobulin domain prediction of scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19. The scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 had heavy-chain (VH) and light-chain (VL) variable domains connected by a linker. (b) The 2D graphical representations of VH and VL protein domains of scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 were drawn by IMGT/Collier-de-Perles.
Figure 2. DNA sequence analysis of scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 from recombinant pOPE101 plasmid. (a) Nucleotide sequence and immunoglobulin domain prediction of scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19. The scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 had heavy-chain (VH) and light-chain (VL) variable domains connected by a linker. (b) The 2D graphical representations of VH and VL protein domains of scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 were drawn by IMGT/Collier-de-Perles.
Tropicalmed 08 00160 g002
Tropicalmed 08 00160 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Purified scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 at the predicted molecular weight (26–28 kDa); M = broad range protein ladder; lane 1 purified scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19; (b) Indirect ELISA result of scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 with coproantigens at 0 and 12 wpi of O. viverrini-infected hamsters (n = 6); (c) The relative absorbance values (OD12 wpi/OD0 wpi) of scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 and anti-OvROPN1L antibody to coproantigens of Opisthorchis viverrini-infected hamsters (n = 6, each). The asterisk (*) represents statistical significance (p < 0.05) calculated by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test.
Figure 3. (a) Purified scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 at the predicted molecular weight (26–28 kDa); M = broad range protein ladder; lane 1 purified scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19; (b) Indirect ELISA result of scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 with coproantigens at 0 and 12 wpi of O. viverrini-infected hamsters (n = 6); (c) The relative absorbance values (OD12 wpi/OD0 wpi) of scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 and anti-OvROPN1L antibody to coproantigens of Opisthorchis viverrini-infected hamsters (n = 6, each). The asterisk (*) represents statistical significance (p < 0.05) calculated by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test.
Tropicalmed 08 00160 g003
Tropicalmed 08 00160 g004 550
Figure 4. Computerized interactions between the modeled OvROPN1L (red, mainly alpha-helical) and scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 (green, mainly beta-sheets), as determined by molecular modeling and docking (a). The interacting amino acids of the antigen-binding domains of scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 (green sticks) and the OvROPN1L peptide (grey sticks) are shown below (b–h). Interaction details are listed in Table 1.
Figure 4. Computerized interactions between the modeled OvROPN1L (red, mainly alpha-helical) and scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 (green, mainly beta-sheets), as determined by molecular modeling and docking (a). The interacting amino acids of the antigen-binding domains of scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19 (green sticks) and the OvROPN1L peptide (grey sticks) are shown below (b–h). Interaction details are listed in Table 1.
Tropicalmed 08 00160 g004
Table
Table 1. Amino acid interactions between the OvROPN1L peptide and scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19.
Table 1. Amino acid interactions between the OvROPN1L peptide and scFv anti-OvROPN1L-CL19.
OvROPN1L Amino AcidsscFvType of Interaction
Amino AcidsDomain
* L3D31VH-CDR1H-bond
* N5G33VH-CDR1H-bond
* P7F50VH-FR2π-Alkyl
* D6S52VH-CDR2H-bond
* D6N53VH-CDR2H-bond
* P2 H-bond
* V4L54VH-CDR2H-bond
* D6S57VH-CDR2H-bond
* N5G99VH-CDR3H-bond
* N5G100VH-CDR3H-bond
* N5N101VH-CDR3H-bond
* P7 H-bond
* Y8 H-bond
* H11D135VL-FR1H-bond
I14I136VL-FR1Hydrophobic
L24V137VL-FR1Hydrophobic
L40A143VL-FR1Hydrophobic
I14S162VL-CDR1H-bond
P15 H-bond
* Q13S164VL-CDR1H-bond
* C10S225VL-CDR3H-bond
* Amino acids located in the target peptide.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Geadkaew-Krenc, A.; Krenc, D.; Thanongsaksrikul, J.; Grams, R.; Phadungsil, W.; Glab-ampai, K.; Chantree, P.; Martviset, P. Production and Immunological Characterization of scFv Specific to Epitope of Opisthorchis viverrini Rhophilin-Associated Tail Protein 1-like (OvROPN1L). Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8, 160. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8030160

AMA Style

Geadkaew-Krenc A, Krenc D, Thanongsaksrikul J, Grams R, Phadungsil W, Glab-ampai K, Chantree P, Martviset P. Production and Immunological Characterization of scFv Specific to Epitope of Opisthorchis viverrini Rhophilin-Associated Tail Protein 1-like (OvROPN1L). Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2023; 8(3):160. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8030160

Chicago/Turabian Style

Geadkaew-Krenc, Amornrat, Dawid Krenc, Jeeraphong Thanongsaksrikul, Rudi Grams, Wansika Phadungsil, Kittirat Glab-ampai, Pathanin Chantree, and Pongsakorn Martviset. 2023. "Production and Immunological Characterization of scFv Specific to Epitope of Opisthorchis viverrini Rhophilin-Associated Tail Protein 1-like (OvROPN1L)" Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 8, no. 3: 160. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8030160

APA Style

Geadkaew-Krenc, A., Krenc, D., Thanongsaksrikul, J., Grams, R., Phadungsil, W., Glab-ampai, K., Chantree, P., & Martviset, P. (2023). Production and Immunological Characterization of scFv Specific to Epitope of Opisthorchis viverrini Rhophilin-Associated Tail Protein 1-like (OvROPN1L). Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, 8(3), 160. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8030160

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop