Next Article in Journal
Bioecological Aspects of Species of the Subgenus Mansonia (Mansonia) (Diptera: Culicidae) Prior to the Installation of Hydroelectric Dams on the Madeira River, Rondônia State, Brazil
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of COVID-19 on Knowledge, Beliefs, and Practices of Ni-Vanuatu Health Workers Regarding Antibiotic Prescribing and Antibiotic Resistance, 2018 and 2022: A Mixed Methods Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Plasmodium knowlesi (Pk) Malaria: A Review & Proposal of Therapeutically Rational Exchange (T-REX) of Pk-Resistant Red Blood Cells

by
Ryan Philip Jajosky
1,2,*,
Shang-Chuen Wu
1,
Philip G. Jajosky
2 and
Sean R. Stowell
1
1
Joint Program in Transfusion Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 630E New Research Building, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, USA
2
Biconcavity Inc., Lilburn, GA 30047, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8(10), 478; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8100478
Submission received: 3 July 2023 / Revised: 9 October 2023 / Accepted: 12 October 2023 / Published: 20 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Diseases)

Abstract

:
Plasmodium knowlesi (Pk) causes zoonotic malaria and is known as the “fifth human malaria parasite”. Pk malaria is an emerging threat because infections are increasing and can be fatal. While most infections are in Southeast Asia (SEA), especially Malaysia, travelers frequently visit this region and can present with Pk malaria around the world. So, clinicians need to know (1) patients who present with fever after recent travel to SEA might be infected with Pk and (2) Pk is often misdiagnosed as P. malariae (which typically causes less severe malaria). Here we review the history, pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of Pk malaria. Severe disease is most common in adults. Signs and symptoms can include fever, abdominal pain, jaundice, acute kidney injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, hyponatremia, hyperparasitemia, and thrombocytopenia. Dengue is one of the diseases to be considered in the differential. Regarding pathophysiologic mechanisms, when Pk parasites invade mature red blood cells (RBCs, i.e., normocytes) and reticulocytes, changes in the red blood cell (RBC) surface can result in life-threatening cytoadherence, sequestration, and reduced RBC deformability. Since molecular mechanisms involving the erythrocytic stage are responsible for onset of severe disease and lethal outcomes, it is biologically plausible that manual exchange transfusion (ET) or automated RBC exchange (RBCX) could be highly beneficial by replacing “sticky” parasitized RBCs with uninfected, deformable, healthy donor RBCs. Here we suggest use of special Pk-resistant donor RBCs to optimize adjunctive manual ET/RBCX for malaria. “Therapeutically-rational exchange transfusion” (T-REX) is proposed in which Pk-resistant RBCs are transfused (instead of disease-promoting RBCs). Because expression of the Duffy antigen on the surface of human RBCs is essential for parasite invasion, T-REX of Duffy-negative RBCs—also known as Fy(a-b-) RBCs—could replace the majority of the patient’s circulating normocytes with Pk invasion-resistant RBCs (in a single procedure lasting about 2 h). When sequestered or non-sequestered iRBCs rupture—in a 24 h Pk asexual life cycle—the released merozoites cannot invade Fy(a-b-) RBCs. When Fy(a-b-) RBC units are scarce (e.g., in Malaysia), clinicians can consider the risks and benefits of transfusing plausibly Pk-resistant RBCs, such as glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficient (G6PDd) RBCs and Southeast Asian ovalocytes (SAO). Patients typically require a very short recovery time (<1 h) after the procedure. Fy(a-b-) RBCs should have a normal lifespan, while SAO and G6PDd RBCs may have mildly reduced half-lives. Because SAO and G6PDd RBCs come from screened blood donors who are healthy and not anemic, these RBCs have a low-risk for hemolysis and do not need to be removed after the patient recovers from malaria. T-REX could be especially useful if (1) antimalarial medications are not readily available, (2) patients are likely to progress to severe disease, or (3) drug-resistant strains emerge. In conclusion, T-REX is a proposed optimization of manual ET/RBCX that has not yet been utilized but can be considered by physicians to treat Pk malaria patients.

1. Background

In 1927, Plasmodium knowlesi (Pk) was first observed by Giuseppe Franchini when examining the blood of Macaca fascicularis (long-tailed macaque, or cynomolgus monkey) [1]. In 1931, Napier and Campbell inoculated Pk into M. mulatta (rhesus macaques) and described severe infection. In 1932, B. M. Das Gupta and Robert Knowles described experimental Pk infection in humans [2]. Consequently, Pk was named after Knowles. Pk is sometimes referred to as the “fifth human malaria parasite”, after P. falciparum (Pf), P. vivax (Pv), P. ovale, and P. malariae (Pm) [3,4,5,6]. P. ovale is now divided into P. ovale wallikeri and P. ovale curtisi. This is an example of sympatric speciation, in which both parasites co-exist in the same location, but the reason for this divergence is not fully understood [7].
Pk primarily infects individuals in Southeast Asia (SEA) (Figure 1) [8,9]. Malaysia has the most cases of any nation (Figure 2A), and Peninsular Malaysia has fewer cases than Malaysian Borneo (containing the states of Sarawak, Sabah, and the Federal Territory of Labuan) [9]. In 2020, Malaysia had 2839 malaria cases, of which 1537 (54.1%) were in Sabah and 862 (30.4%) were in Sarawak, and the vast majority were caused by indigenous Pk [10]. In addition, travelers to SEA can acquire Pk infection and then require medical care around the world [11,12,13,14].
Of the five major Plasmodium species that cause malaria in humans, Pk is the only one with zoonotic transmission and is known as a simian malaria parasite [15,16]. The predominant natural hosts of Pk are M. fascicularis and M. nemestrina (pig-tailed macaque) (Figure 2B) [17,18]. Macaque–mosquito–macaque transmission and macaque–mosquito–human transmission occur naturally by Anopheles of the Leucosphyrus Group, which are exophagic (bite outdoors) [19,20,21,22]. These mosquitoes are found in forests and forest edges, where adult men often work as farmers, loggers, hunters, etc., which helps explain higher infection rates in males [23,24]. (Note: An. gambiae is the chief mosquito vector of Pf [25].) The dominant vector of Pk in Sabah is An. balabacensis, while An. latens is the main vector in parts of Sarawak [18,26]. Experimental human–mosquito–human transmission has been demonstrated by An. balabacensis [27], but sustained natural transmission is thought to be unlikely [28].
Timor Leste is the only nation in SEA to not report a case of human Pk malaria [8]. While the explanation is unclear, articles from 2013 and 2016 show that Timor Leste is not home to Anopheles in the Leucosphyrus Group [22,29]. Instead, Timor Leste is home to An. barbirostris and An. subpictus [30]. Pf was the dominant species in Timor Leste. In June 2017, the last indigenous case of malaria was reported in Timor Leste.
Figure 1. Political map of SEA obtained from The World Factbook [31].
Figure 1. Political map of SEA obtained from The World Factbook [31].
Tropicalmed 08 00478 g001
Figure 2. (A) Nations with Pk malaria cases described in the 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) Malaria Report [32]. In 2021, there were 3575 Pk cases in Malaysia and 435 total cases in Thailand, the Philippines, and Indonesia. The map of SEA is in the public domain and was obtained from Wikimedia Commons and then edited [33]. (B) Anopheles mosquitoes can transmit Pk from macaques to macaques or humans. (C) A Pk malaria patient being treated with adjunctive RBCX, which reduces the number of pre-RBCX RBCs. The extent of the reduction is determined by the procedure settings and is technically known as the fraction of (original) cells remaining (FCR). For malaria patients, the FCR reflects the fraction of the pre-RBCX circulating iRBCs remaining since RBCX cannot remove the sequestered iRBCs. (D) Immediately before T-REX, the patient has circulating uRBCs, iRBCs, and sequestered iRBCs. Immediately after T-REX with an FCR of 33.3%, 66.6% of the patient’s original circulating uRBCs and iRBCs are removed, but the sequestered iRBCs are not. In this schematic, Pk invasion-resistant Fy(a-b-) RBCs were transfused during T-REX (depicted as brighter colored RBCs). After one Pk asexual life cycle, which is 24 h, the sequestered and non-sequestered iRBCs will rupture, releasing free merozoites that cannot invade Fy(a-b-) donor RBCs. Multiple images were obtained from BioRender.
Figure 2. (A) Nations with Pk malaria cases described in the 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) Malaria Report [32]. In 2021, there were 3575 Pk cases in Malaysia and 435 total cases in Thailand, the Philippines, and Indonesia. The map of SEA is in the public domain and was obtained from Wikimedia Commons and then edited [33]. (B) Anopheles mosquitoes can transmit Pk from macaques to macaques or humans. (C) A Pk malaria patient being treated with adjunctive RBCX, which reduces the number of pre-RBCX RBCs. The extent of the reduction is determined by the procedure settings and is technically known as the fraction of (original) cells remaining (FCR). For malaria patients, the FCR reflects the fraction of the pre-RBCX circulating iRBCs remaining since RBCX cannot remove the sequestered iRBCs. (D) Immediately before T-REX, the patient has circulating uRBCs, iRBCs, and sequestered iRBCs. Immediately after T-REX with an FCR of 33.3%, 66.6% of the patient’s original circulating uRBCs and iRBCs are removed, but the sequestered iRBCs are not. In this schematic, Pk invasion-resistant Fy(a-b-) RBCs were transfused during T-REX (depicted as brighter colored RBCs). After one Pk asexual life cycle, which is 24 h, the sequestered and non-sequestered iRBCs will rupture, releasing free merozoites that cannot invade Fy(a-b-) donor RBCs. Multiple images were obtained from BioRender.
Tropicalmed 08 00478 g002
Interestingly, early in the 20th century, both Pk-infected RBCs (Pk iRBCs) and Pv iRBCs were used as a pyretic agent to treat neurosyphilis [34]. This strategy was supported by in vitro data showing that Treponema pallidum could be killed at temperatures that are reached during human fevers [34], subsequent data that T. pallidum does not have a heat-shock response [35], and data that it has a heat-labile 3-phosphoglycerate mutase [36]. Julius Wagner-Jauregg, an Austrian psychiatrist, received the 1927 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for developing this treatment, although its efficacy has been questioned in modern times because there were no randomized controlled trials [34]. Pk-iRBC malariotherapy was abandoned when the risks were recognized [4,8,29,37,38]. Currently, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United States of America (US) has warned about the severity of Pk malaria and the need to immediately start appropriate treatment [39]. In terms of whether fever is beneficial for Pf infection, it was recently discovered that Pf transcription factor PfAP2-HS leads to transcription of hsp70-1 and hsp90, which protects it from high temperatures [40].

2. Pathophysiology

Although both Pk and Pf are associated with an elevated risk of severe malaria [41], the pathophysiology has notable similarities and differences.

2.1. Pk Life Cycle

The Pk life cycle resembles that of other human-infecting Plasmodium, i.e., involving a mosquito, liver, and blood stage [29]. When Plasmodium infected Anopheles mosquitoes take a blood meal from a person, Plasmodium sporozoites are injected into the bloodstream. The sporozoites invade hepatocytes, develop into schizonts, and then rupture and release merozoites, which invade normocytes and/or reticulocytes. Asexual multiplication (erythrocytic schizogony) occurs when immature trophozoites (ring forms) develop into mature trophozoites and then into schizonts that rupture and release merozoites [42]. A small fraction of intraerythrocytic parasites develop into their sexual forms (gametocytes), through a process known as gametocytogenesis [43]. Sexually committed ring forms can be indistinguishable from asexual ones [43]. The male and female forms are known as microgametocytes and macrogametocytes, respectively. The malaria life cycle is described in detail elsewhere [29,42]. Importantly, the clinical signs and symptoms are caused by the erythrocytic stage. Notably, Pk does not have a latent (dormant) liver stage involving hypnozoites.

2.2. RBC Invasion

Pk and Pf invasion of RBCs occurs in about 60 seconds [44]. After a merozoite binds to a human cell, it orients so the host cell is facing the parasites’ apical end, containing micronemes and rhoptries, which are secretory organelles. The parasite’s apical end then fuses with the RBC, and the actomyosin motor advances the parasite into the RBC. This invaginated RBC membrane is known as the parasitophorous vacuole. Duffy binding proteins (DBPs) and reticulocyte binding-like proteins (RBLs) are used during invasion [44].
Both Pk and Pf merozoites use Apical Membrane Antigen 1 (AMA1 or AMA-1) to reorient the parasite’s apical end toward the host cell [45,46]. Anti-PkAMA1 IgG antibodies can block Pk invasion into human RBCs in vitro [47]. Because AMA-1 is highly immunogenic and has low levels of polymorphisms, it has been a target for Pk and Pf vaccine development [48,49,50,51]. Pk merozoites require the Duffy antigen (also known as Atypical Chemokine Receptor 1 (ACKR1) or CD234) [52] on human cells for invasion, which is similar to Pv, while Pf requires basigin (CD147) and CD55 [5,53,54,55].
For Pk to invade human cells, it requires normocyte-binding protein Xa (PkNBPXa) and the second region of Duffy-binding protein α (PkDBPαII) [5,56]. Both proteins are targets for vaccine development [5,57]. The human receptor for PkNBPXa is unclear. In contrast, PkNBPXa and b as well as PkDBPα, β, and γ can bind to macaque cells [57]. PkNBPXa is required for invasion of human cells, but not macaque cells, possibly because PkNBPXb can compensate [44]. PkDBPβ and γ only bind to macaque cells because they display N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc), while human cells do not [58,59]. Although Pv also uses a DBP (PvDBPII) to invade human cells, it has a much stronger preference for reticulocytes than normocytes [57]. One reason is that it expresses PvRBP2b, which binds to the reticulocyte marker CD71 (transferrin receptor 1). Pf requires PfRh5 to invade human cells expressing basigin [44].
Pk and Pf parasites can invade both reticulocytes and normocytes [57,60,61,62]. One study evaluated reticulocyte and normocyte invasion by Pk strain A1-H.1. The H strain was obtained from the first person with confirmed natural infection. From the H strain, the A1 strain was derived and maintained in vivo in rhesus macaques. Then, it was cultured in vitro in macaque and human RBCs until it adapted to survive exclusively in human RBCs [63]. This is how the A1-H.1 strain was created. This strain invaded 2.2% of human normocytes and 8.6% of reticulocytes in an in vitro assay [60]. The Pk strain UM01 was also tested. It was derived from a patient treated in Malaysia and expanded in vivo in M. fascicularis. This strain invaded 2.1% of human normocytes and 2.9% of reticulocytes [60]. Because a normal reticulocyte count is 0.5–2.5% in healthy adults, mature RBCs are far more abundant in the peripheral blood and likely contribute to the disease pathogenesis [64].

2.3. Pk Intraerythrocytic Cycle

Although Pk’s intraerythrocytic replication cycle takes approximately 24 h, compared to 48 h for Pf and Pv, median parasitemia was lower in hospitalized Pk patients than in Pf or Pv patients [29,63,65,66,67]. One group studied the baseline characteristics of non-pregnant malaria patients ≥ 15 years old who presented to a hospital in Malaysia [66]. They found the median parasite density was 1387 (n = 107), 26,781 (n = 24), and 4258 (n = 21) parasites per microliter for Pk, Pf, and Pv patients at presentation, respectively. This seems surprising given that Pk has the fastest asexual life cycle. Despite Pk patients having a lower parasite density, they had similar clinical and laboratory findings to the Pf and Pv patients [66]. They also found the mean age was 44.9, 38.7, and 35.5 years for Pk, Pf, and Pv patients, respectively. In addition, the mean platelet count was 71,000, 108,000, and 118,000 platelets per microliter for Pk, Pf, and Pv patients, respectively. A different study evaluated baseline characteristics of non-pregnant malaria patients > 12 years old who presented to three different hospitals in Malaysia. Similarly, Pk patients were the oldest, had the lowest parasite densities, and had the lowest platelet counts at baseline [65]. In addition, this study found parasite densities > 20,000 parasites per microliter in 15%, 32%, and 7% of Pk, Pf, and Pv patients, respectively. Perhaps Pk patients have lower parasite counts than Pf patients because they present at hospitals earlier than Pf patients—plausible since Pk patients, in general, are older and have lower platelet counts than Pf patients.

2.4. RBC Deformability

Both Pk and Pf malaria are associated with reduced RBC deformability of both iRBCs and uninfected RBCs (uRBCs) [68,69]. One study attributed the reduced deformability of uRBCs to the fact that a high proportion of the uRBCs were echinocytes, which have increased membrane shear modulus (resistance to membrane extension) [68]. The median percentage of uRBCs which were echinocytes, was 96% in Pk patients and 1% in controls (p = 0.0002). This finding was not observed in uRBCs from Pk-infected M. fascicularis. While the methods describe the use of a Giemsa stain, the photograph of the echinocytes appears to be from an unstained sample on a 37 °C stage in isotonic saline. Thus, this photograph does not resemble a typical thin smear of peripheral blood. Thin smears photographs from Pk patients published by the CDC and other sources do not seem to show a dramatic number of uRBCs having echinocyte morphology, and these sources do not mention high percentages of echinocytes [29,70,71]. The authors showed that echinocyte formation was not caused by the cryopreservation and thawing process because a high percentage of echinocytes was also seen with fresh blood samples. The authors did not find a positive correlation between the percentage of echinocytes and the length of time from sample collection to analysis.
Pf researchers have studied the mechanism by which uRBCs become less deformable [72]. One research study proposed that iRBCs release ATP, which is converted to AMP via CD39; AMP is converted to adenosine via CD73; and adenosine signals through the adenosine A2B receptor (ADORA2B) found on RBCs increase intracellular cAMP [72]. The cAMP causes protein kinase A to phosphorylate cytoskeletal proteins, which reduces the RBCs’ deformability. Thus, the extracellular adenosine can act as a “bystander molecule”, reducing RBC plasma membrane deformability in cis for iRBCs and in trans for uRBCs [72]. Regardless of the mechanism, reduced deformability may contribute to the microvascular accumulation of Pk- and Pf-iRBCs [68,73,74].

2.5. Cytoadhesion & SICA Antigens

Although all blood-stage forms of Pk circulate, recent data suggest that a subset of Pk-iRBCs demonstrate endothelial cytoadherence (sequestration), which is a key mechanism for the microvascular accumulation of Pf-iRBCs [74,75,76,77,78]. A recent study of Pk malaria in rhesus macaques, a non-natural host, was conducted by the Emory National Primate Research Center [74]. The study found that cytoadherence and sequestration can occur in a subpopulation of Pk iRBCs. The sequestration of iRBCs can protect against splenic clearance [79]. However, the sequestration ends when the schizont ruptures to release merozoites [80]. This occurs once every 24 h (the duration of Pk’s asexual lifecycle). Pk sequestration is likely dependent on Schizont-Infected Cell Agglutination (SICA) antigens. These protein antigens, encoded by the SICAvar gene family, are only expressed on iRBCs when a functional spleen is present [74,77].
SICA[+] iRBCs, which are highly virulent in rhesus macaques, can be found in rhesus macaques with functional spleens. When SICA[+] iRBCs are passaged in splenectomized rhesus macaques, they become less virulent SICA[-] iRBCs. If SICA[-] iRBCs are passaged in rhesus macaques with function spleens, either a milder disease is observed or SICA[+] iRBCs form and lead to more severe disease. The exact mechanism by which the spleen regulates SICAvar gene expression is unknown, and additional research on this topic is needed. Pf has analogous variant antigens known as Pf erythrocyte membrane protein 1 (PfEMP1), which is encoded by the var gene family. Pf-iRBCs cytoadhere to endothelial receptors (e.g., CD36, ICAM-1, etc.) via knob-like protrusions, which display PfEMP1 [73]. In contrast, Pk-iRBCs do not have knobs which protrude outward, but have caveolae pits (which invaginate) [73]. An autopsy of a person with Pk malaria, but not with cerebral malaria (CM), demonstrated neither cytoadherence nor increased intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) on brain endothelium [78]. In contrast, cytoadherence and the upregulation of ICAM-1 on brain endothelium are evident in cases of Pf CM [81]. These findings may explain why Pf is associated with CM, while Pk is not associated with CM.

2.6. Pediatric Patients Rarely Develop Severe Pk Malaria

While Pk can infect both children and adults, life-threatening malaria typically spares children [41,65,82,83]. There is a positive correlation between age and Pk parasitemia [84]. In Pk patients, there is also a direct correlation between age and angiopoietin-2 (a marker of endothelial activation), interleukin-6 (IL-6) (a pro-inflammatory cytokine), and microvascular dysfunction, independent of parasitemia [84]. Both angiopoietin-2 and IL-6 increase with age and increase with Pf severity, which may help explain why Pk disease severity positively correlates with age [84].

2.7. Tissue Expression of Duffy Antigen

In Pk schizonts, PkDBPα is found within micronemes, a parasite secretory organelle [44]. After Pk merozoites egress from human cells, PkDBPα is gradually and continuously secreted onto the merozoite surface [44]. PkDBPα is most abundant at the merozoites’ widest circumference and the tip of the basal end [44]. Importantly, PkDBPα release onto the merozoite surface has been observed even if merozoites do not bind to RBCs [44].
Thus, it is worth considering the localization of Duffy antigen expression in non-erythroid human cells. A 1997 study conducted by researchers at the New York Blood Center examined human tissues using a Duffy-specific antibody. They found Duffy expression on the endothelium in the kidney, lung, spleen, and thyroid [85,86]. In addition, Duffy was expressed on epithelium of the kidney’s collecting ducts and lung alveoli. It has also been found on the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum [86]. This is intriguing because the kidney and lung can be severely damaged in human Pk malaria. In addition, studies of Pk infection in rhesus macaques found that Pk iRBCs were mostly found in the kidney, lung, spleen, gastrointestinal tract, and adrenal gland [74]. It is unclear whether PkDBPα can bind to Duffy antigen in these locations (e.g., renal and pulmonary endothelium). It is also worth noting that Pv, which also has a DBP, can be associated with AKI and ARDS [87].

3. Clinical Course

3.1. Signs and Symptoms

Pk-infected children less than 15 years old are much more likely to be asymptomatic than adults, and pediatric patients rarely experience severe disease or death [41,65]. Adult Pk malaria patients often present with the following non-specific symptoms: fever, chills, headache, abdominal pain, myalgia, nausea, vomiting, and cough [73]. Clinical signs often include tachycardia and tachypnea, while hypotension, jaundice, and respiratory distress may also manifest. Neurologic findings are rare, however retinal hemorrhages can occasionally be seen, likely due to the near universal finding of thrombocytopenia in adults [73]. According to WHO criteria, slightly more than one-third of adults present with anemia. Leukocyte counts are usually normal, except for neutrophilia, which is seen in severe cases.
Several studies have described signs and symptoms of severe Pk malaria. A study of Pk-infected patients in Malaysia included 28 cases of severe malaria, which were only seen in adults. The WHO malaria severity criteria that were most often identified in severe Pk malaria are as follows: severe acute kidney injury (AKI), jaundice, hyperparasitemia (parasite density > 100,000 parasites/μL), and severe anemia [65]. The study also found that a parasite density > 15,000/μL was the best predictor of severe Pk malaria (adjusted odds ratio 16.1, p < 0.001). A different report of severe Pk malaria in Malaysia included 44 patients [88]. The study found that the WHO malaria severity criteria most often seen in severe Pk malaria were as follows: AKI, jaundice, hyperparasitemia, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Coma, which is associated with CM, did not occur in either study. Multiple studies have shown parasitemia has a positive correlation with age and is associated with severe disease [73,84].

3.2. Deaths

In 2019, a case-series and systematic review of 32 polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed Pk malaria deaths in Malaysia was published [41]. At presentation, the median age was 56, and 56% were men. All fatal cases were in adults, and all presented with thrombocytopenia (median of 38,500 platelets per microliter), increased creatinine, and hyponatremia (median of 128 mmol/L) if lab testing was performed. Thrombocytopenia is also seen in Pv and Pf malaria patients, but the reason is not fully understood [89]. However, platelets are known to kill malaria parasites [89]. While the underlying cause of hyponatremia is unknown, it might be related to AKI. Hyponatremia can also be seen in severe Pf malaria [90].
After retrospectively reviewing the patient’s medical records, ~94% of these patients met the WHO criteria for severe malaria, but only 63% of these patients were properly diagnosed with severe malaria at the time of admission. The most common severe malaria criteria that were identified at presentation included jaundice, severe AKI, and respiratory distress. In addition, abdominal pain was reported by 65% of patients, and cardiovascular-metabolic comorbidities were present in 34% of cases. None of the patients that died had severe anemia at presentation. Only 1 of 30 patients who died had coma at presentation; however, alternative causes in this case were not investigated. Interestingly, an autopsy of a patient without coma revealed cerebral pathology, including sequestration in the brain and petechial hemorrhages [78].
Why did these patients die? In 90% of the fatal cases, the Plasmodium species was misidentified by microscopy, with the vast majority being misdiagnosed as Pm (which typically causes milder malaria). Consequently, there was a delay in starting intravenous (IV) artesunate in 36% of cases. When severe malaria had been properly diagnosed at presentation, IV antimalarial medication was provided immediately in 81% of cases. In two cases, IV artesunate was unavailable. The median time to death was 41 h. This study also found that independent risk factors for death included female sex (reason unknown) and age ≥ 45 years, which is a previously described risk factor for severe Pk malaria.

4. Differential Diagnosis

Based on the signs and symptoms of Pk malaria, the differential diagnosis may include arboviruses (dengue virus) [78], influenza [91], pharyngitis [92], Typhoid fever [93], leptospirosis [93], viral encephalitis [11], dyspepsia [41], gastritis [94], rhabdomyolysis [95], and others. Dengue, Typhoid fever, and leptospirosis warrant discussion.
Dengue viral infections can mimic Pk malaria [96]. This is because both are transmitted by mosquitoes in SEA and both can be associated with fever, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, muscle aches, headache, hypotension, thrombocytopenia, and hyponatremia [78,97]. Atypical features of dengue can include ARDS, renal failure, rhabdomyolysis, and others [11]. Thus, dengue diagnostic testing (e.g., serology, antigen detection, molecular testing, etc.) is often mentioned in Pk malaria case reports [78,98,99,100]. There may be clues to differentiating between the two. For example, the Aedes aegypti mosquito, which can transmit dengue virus, is an “urban mosquito”, so most infections are in urban/semi-urban areas [97,101]. Dengue can be associated with prolonged fever, pain behind the eyes, bleeding, leucopenia and increased vascular permeability, which can lead to ascites, pleural effusion, and a progressively increasing hematocrit [102,103]. However, thrombocytopenia can lead to bleeding, which can reduce the hematocrit. Of course, co-infection with Pk can also occur [97,104].
Typhoid fever is caused by the bacteria Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi and is often confused with malaria [105,106]. Regarding Asia, most cases occur in South Asia (e.g., India, Pakistan, Bangladesh). It is most often spread through sewage that contaminates water or food and can be transmitted from human-to-human. Key signs and symptoms include persistent fever, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, headache, diarrhea, constipation, maculopapular rash resembling rose-colored spots on the trunk, hepatosplenomegaly, and others [106,107]. Complications include intestinal hemorrhage, anemia, intestinal perforation, cholecystitis, hepatitis, pneumonia, myocarditis, shock, encephalopathy, and others [107]. Blood culture is the preferred method of diagnosing acute infection, but bone marrow culture can increase the sensitivity [106].
Leptospirosis is caused by Leptospira species, which can be acquired in SEA [108], and is often mistaken for malaria [109]. It can be transmitted through the mucous membranes, cuts in the skin, urine, reproductive fluids, or contaminated food or water. Animals such as rats often shed the bacteria in their urine [109]. Outbreaks are associated with heavy rain, flooding, and hurricanes, which spreads the infected urine [109]. For example, travelers to SEA who engage in recreational boating or swimming in contaminated fresh water or are exposed to contaminated mud can become infected. While most infections are asymptomatic, some progress with signs and symptoms including fever, chills, lower-back and calve pain, headache, photophobia, conjunctival suffusion, retro-orbital pain, nausea, vomiting, and skin rash [108]. Severe disease includes cardiac arrhythmia, hemorrhage, jaundice, shock, liver failure, aseptic meningitis, renal failure, pulmonary insufficiency, and pulmonary hemorrhagic syndrome [108]. The diagnosis can be made using PCR of whole blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). CDC states that the microscopic agglutination test (MAT) is the “reference standard” [108]. If serology is used, CDC recommends an IgM-specific screening test, followed by confirmation using the MAT [108].

5. Pk Diagnosis

5.1. Microscopy

The diagnostic criteria for Pk malaria can vary based on location. According to the 2013 Management Guidelines of Malaria in Malaysia, the diagnosis is made using clinical suspicion and the detection of blood parasites [110,111]. The CDC “Algorithm for Diagnosis and Treatment of Malaria in the United States” starts with determining (1) if a patient has a fever and has travelled to a malaria-endemic region or (2) if there is a clinical suspicion of malaria [112]. If either is true, thick and thin blood smears need to be immediately examined using a microscope. The thick smear is used to detect Plasmodium parasites, while the thin smear is to identify the species and measure parasitemia [39]. In Malaysia, light microscopy is the first-line method to diagnose Pk malaria [113]. The CDC provides blood smear photographs and a table of microscopic features of the iRBCs and parasites for the five major human-infecting Plasmodium species [70]. If blood smears do not show Plasmodium, they must be repeated every 12–24 h until three sets of smears have been reviewed.
Early trophozoite forms of Pk can resemble Pf, while Pk’s late/mature trophozoite forms, schizonts, and gametocytes can resemble Pm [29,114,115,116]. In addition, a case-series in Thailand described six Pk malaria cases, of which five were initially diagnosed with Pv [91]. Pk is most often mistaken for Pm (Figure 3), which typically causes less severe malaria. So, parasites resembling Pm are supposed to be reported as Pk in areas where Pk is prevalent (Sabah and Sarawak) [110,111]. In Malaysia, the definitive diagnosis is made using PCR [117]. A study on the morphology of Pk on blood smears found subtle features that may distinguish it from Pm [71]. For example, Pk trophozoites can have double chromatin dots, 2–3 parasites per RBC, and mature schizonts can have as many as 16 merozoites (versus up to 12 for Pm, up to 16 for P. ovale, and up to 24 for Pv and Pf) [70,71]. The authors conclude that it is difficult to identify Pk based on morphology. They suggest that a diagnosis of Pk malaria can be made based on the following: morphology resembling Pm, severe disease, parasite density > 5000/uL, and recent time in forest fringes in SEA [71]. Since 2018, Malaysia has not reported indigenous cases of Pf, Pv, Pm, nor P. ovale malaria, but they still have imported cases, which must be distinguished from Pk [118].
Some researchers have used immunohistochemistry (IHC) to try to detect Pk in tissue sections [78]. For example, an autopsy was performed on a patient with PCR-confirmed Pk malaria, and brain sections were stained using IHC. The anti-Pf histidine-rich protein (HRP) stain was negative, while the anti-Pf/Pv aldolase stain was positive [119]. Of course, the anti-PfHRP may not cross-react with Pk antigens, and the anti-Plasmodium aldolase stain is not specific for Pk.

5.2. Molecular Testing

Fortunately, PCR and molecular testing, the gold-standard for diagnosis, are becoming more accessible in Malaysia and other countries [23,120]. Rapid Pk testing can also be performed using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), a point-of-care test that is related to PCR, but amplifies nucleic acids at a constant temperature [8,23]. While molecular methods can be very accurate, their limitations include cost and resources (i.e., equipment, reagents, trained operators to perform the tests, etc.).

5.3. RDTs

The WHO recommends either microscopy or rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) to diagnose malaria [121]. RDTs are lateral flow immunochromatographic tests that can identify malaria antigens or antibodies [122,123]. Because there is a lack of microscopy in many parts of SEA, RDTs could fill this void [113]. However, no Pk RDT has been developed [113]. In one study, the best performing antibody for detecting Plasmodium in Pk-infected persons was the anti-Pv-parasite lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) component of the BiocreditTM RDT, with 92% sensitivity [113]. Yet, none of the available RDTs met the 95% sensitivity cutoff that WHO uses to replace microscopy as the first-line method for diagnosis [113]. RDTs which detect Pf HRP2 did not cross-react with Pk strain A1-H.1, so this RDT could be useful to exclude Pf, which can morphologically resemble Pk [14,113].
There is a need for a Pk RDT, especially in locations where molecular diagnostics are not feasible. One potential candidate target may be Pk Serine Repeat Antigen 2 (PkSERA3 Ag2), a protein with an unknown function that is expressed in late trophozoites and schizonts [124]. It has been employed for the serological detection of Pk infection [125]. The peptide AELQKAKMV in PkSERA3 Ag2 has recently been shown to be specific for Pk and not for other human-infecting Plasmodium species [124]. Of note, this peptide epitope does not contain serine. Additional research on PkSERA3 Ag2 is needed.

5.4. Uncomplicated Vs. Severe Malaria

If Plasmodia are identified, the diagnosis needs to be categorized as uncomplicated or severe malaria. Patients with one or more of the following criteria have severe malaria: “impaired consciousness/coma, severe anemia (hemoglobin < 7 g/dL), acute kidney injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, circulatory collapse/shock, disseminated intravascular coagulation, acidosis, jaundice (along with at least one other sign of severe malaria)—and/or percent parasitemia of ≥5%” [39]. These patients require IV antimalarial medication [39].

6. Rapidly Increasing Numbers of Pk Malaria Cases

A 2004 report identified 120 naturally acquired Pk malaria cases in Malaysia from 2000 to 2002 [126], which is notable given the last suspected naturally acquired case was in 1971 [127]. In most cases, the parasites were misidentified as Pm. Starting in 2018, Pk has been the only parasite to cause indigenous malaria in Malaysia [32]. In 2021, Malaysia had 3575 cases of Pk malaria, which resulted in 13 deaths [32]. There were also 435 cases in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thailand [32]. The rise in Pk malaria cases has been attributed to deforestation, increased awareness of this parasite, improved diagnostic testing, and a decrease in malaria caused by other species (which reduced immunity to Plasmodium species) [23]. There is concern for the human–mosquito–human transmission of Pk parasites, which occurs with the other four major human-infecting Plasmodium parasites [128]. Thus, Pk is considered an emerging threat [23].

7. Currently Still No Pk Vaccine

Although AMA-1, PkNBPXa, and PkDBPαII are Pk vaccine targets, no Pk vaccine is currently available for human use [5,50,57]. In contrast, a Pf malaria vaccine known as RTS,S/AS01 (RTS,S or Mosquirix) helps prevent Pf malaria in children [129,130]. This vaccine is targeted against the circumsporozoite protein (CSP) on Pf sporozoites to prevent liver infection, making it a pre-erythrocytic vaccine. The “RTS” component of RTS,S is a fusion protein. The “R” refers to the central repeat region of CSP, which contains the B cell epitopes. “T” is for the CD4+ and CD8+ T cell epitopes. “S” refers to hepatitis B surface antigen. The second “S” is RTS,S stands for monomeric hepatitis B surface antigens. These “S” monomers assemble with “RTS” into virus-like particles (VLPs) that display the CSP protein [130,131]. AS01 is an adjuvant in the vaccine [132].
In 2015, a phase 3 clinical trial of RTS,S in young infants (6–12 weeks old) and children (5–17 months old) was published [132]. The study evaluated whether RTS,S could reduce episodes of clinical Pf malaria or severe Pf malaria versus a comparator vaccine. Participants received a primary series of three doses of vaccine at 0, 1, and 2 months, followed by a booster at 20 months. In this trial, RTS,S was abbreviated as “R”, and the comparator vaccine was abbreviated as “C”. Participants received either four doses of comparator vaccine (abbreviated “C3C”), a primary schedule of RTS,S followed by a comparator vaccine (“R3C”) or a primary schedule of RTS,S followed by RTS,S (“R3R”). The primary series of comparator vaccine was the meningococcal C conjugate vaccine (MenjugateTM) for young infants or the rabies vaccine (VeroRabTM) for children. However, the booster of comparator vaccine was MenjuateTM for both young infants and children.
From month 0 to the study end, R3C and R3R vaccine efficacy against episodes of clinical malaria was 28.3% and 36.3% versus C3C, respectively. In young infants, vaccine efficacy was 18.3% and 25.9%, respectively. These vaccine efficacy percentages all had p values < 0.0001. From month 0 to the study end, statistically significant vaccine efficacy against episodes of severe malaria was only seen in children receiving R3R, versus C3C, which was 32.2% (p value = 0.0009).
However, there were disappointing outcomes. Vaccine efficacy waned over time. Of the 22 children who developed meningitis during the study, 21 received RTS,S; 11 were in the R3R group, 10 were in the R3C group, and 1 was in the C3C group. Unfortunately, no statistically significant differences in overall mortality, malaria mortality, sepsis, or pneumonia were observed. Critiques of the vaccine have been published [133].
In 2021, the WHO recommended widespread RTS,S vaccine administration in areas with a moderate-to-high transmission of Pf [134]. This vaccine is administered as an intramuscular injection into the deltoid. The WHO recommends a 4-dose schedule, with the first dose being administered in children of at least 5 months of age [134,135,136]. The doses should be at least 4 weeks apart, and the fourth dose should be 12–18 months after the third dose [135]. By 2023, at least one vaccine dose was administered to almost 1.7 million children [137]. The vaccine is not thought to provide immunity against Pk or the other major human-infecting Plasmodium species because it targets a Pf protein [138]. PkCSP is being studied and may become a vaccine target [139].

8. Antimalarial Medications

The treatment of Pk malaria can vary due to different guidelines. According to the Ministry of Health in Malaysia, artemether–lumefantrine is first-line treatment for non-severe Pk cases [110]. CDC recommends that uncomplicated Pk malaria in adult or pediatric patients should be treated with either (1) chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine since there is “no widespread evidence of chloroquine resistance” or (2) artemether–lumefantrine [39,112,140].
A study from 2016 found that the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of chloroquine for Pk strain A1-H.1 was 10.9 nM at 24 h and 6.9 nM at 48 h using the [3H] hypoxanthine uptake assay [141]. The study authors mentioned that this was similar to the IC50 of chloroquine for Pf strain 3D7, which was 6 nM at 48 h. Thus, the authors concluded that this Pk strain was chloroquine-sensitive. Chloroquine can disrupt Plasmodium parasites from degrading hemoglobin to hemozoin, leading to a buildup of heme, which is toxic for Plasmodium [62,142,143]. Because Pk is chloroquine-susceptible, it may suggest that it needs hemoglobin as a nutrient source. Interestingly, some Plasmodium species can replicate in reticulocytes without hemozoin formation, giving them chloroquine resistance [144].
Some articles explicitly state that there is no evidence of Pk drug resistance [145]. For example, one study compared the in vitro drug susceptibility of Pk strain A1-H.1 and Pf strain 3D7 for one life cycle [146]. The half maximal effective concentration (EC50) was similar for artemether, artesunate, artemisinin, and dihydroartemisinin [146]. The CDC also encourages the hospitalization of Pk malaria patients to continuously analyze blood smears every 12–24 h to confirm that antimalarial treatment is causing a decline in parasitemia and to monitor the patient’s clinical status [39,112].
In Malaysia, the recommended first-line treatment of severe Pk malaria is IV artesunate and oral doxycycline [110]. The CDC recommends treating severe malaria by admitting the patient to the intensive care unit (ICU), calling the CDC, and administering IV artesunate [39,112]. Artesunate is a potent derivative of artemisinin, which is extracted from Artemisia annua plants [147]. Tu Youyou received the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for her work on artemisinin and malaria. The dose of artesunate is 2.4 mg/kg and needs to be administered at 0, 12, and 24 h. If this medication is not stocked at the healthcare facility, it needs to be emergently requested from a commercial vendor or the hospital’s affiliated distributor [148]. If it cannot be obtained immediately, it can be requested from a nearby hospital, or the patient can be transferred to a hospital that has IV artesunate. Interim treatment needs to be administered, with artemether–lumefantrine being preferred because of the fast onset of artemether (while lumefantrine takes longer to kill the parasites) [39,112,149]. When IV artesunate arrives, it should be started, and the interim treatment should be stopped [148].
More than 4 h after the third dose of IV artesunate, parasitemia needs to be measured [39]. (Note: CDC incorrectly used the term “parasite density”, instead of “parasitemia”, in its Malaria Treatment Guidelines [150]). If parasitemia is >1%, IV artesunate must be continued daily for up to six additional days or until parasitemia is ≤1%. If it is ≤1% and the patient can tolerate oral medications, then follow-on oral medications must be administered. If it is ≤1% and the patient cannot tolerate oral medications, then IV artesunate must be continued daily for up to six additional days or until the patient can tolerate oral medications. By using an antiemetic or inserting a nasogastric tube when needed, oral medications might be feasible. Recipients of IV artesunate must be evaluated each week for 4 weeks after starting the mediation for delayed post-artemisinin hemolytic anemia. This assessment can include evaluating the patient’s hemoglobin, haptoglobin, LDH, bilirubin, etc. [39].

9. Manual Exchange Transfusion (ET)/Automated RBC Exchange (RBCX)

9.1. Manual ET/RBCX

RBCX is an automated procedure in which a trained professional uses an apheresis machine to replace the patient’s reticulocytes and normocytes with healthy donor RBCs. Apheresis literally means “to take away”. Prior to the procedure, the patient’s peripheral or central vasculature needs to be accessed. If there are concerns about the extracorporeal blood volume in the apheresis machine causing hypovolemia (e.g., low-weight or anemic patient), then the apheresis circuitry can be primed with RBC units [151]. Alternatively, anemic patients can be transfused with RBCs prior to starting the procedure. Notably, patient data (i.e., height, weight, hematocrit, etc.) and procedure details (desired post-RBCX hematocrit) can be entered into modern automated, continuous-flow apheresis machines to avoid mistakes and adverse hemodynamic events.
In this procedure, the patient’s blood is anticoagulated and flows through tubing to the apheresis machine, where it can be fractionated into plasma, platelet-rich plasma, leukocytes, and RBCs by a centrifuge. The centrifugal force separates blood according to specific gravity, with RBCs having the highest specific gravity [152,153]. The RBCs (likely including reticulocytes) are selectively removed and donor RBCs are slowly transfused. The procedure usually takes ≤2 h but depends on the multiple factors [154]. For instance, it will take longer if a lower fraction of (host) cells remaining (FCR) is desired (Figure 2C,D).
Manual ET removes the patient’s whole blood and replaces it with donor RBCs reconstituted in albumin solution or plasma. Manual ET can be used if apheresis equipment is not available or there are concerns about the extracorporeal blood volume in the machine representing a high percentage of the patient’s blood volume. Manual ET can be performed using several techniques. For example, a large-bore catheter can be inserted into each vein of the antecubital fossa [155]. One tract serves as the out-flow, in which blood is removed using a blood donation bag. The other tract is the in-flow where RBCs and albumin solution or plasma can be administered. A similar approach can be used, but the out-flow tract can be an artery in the antecubital fossa [156]. The procedure can be isovolumetric [156]. Both manual ET and RBCX can be performed as inpatient or outpatient procedures, and the patient recovery time is typically <1 h.

9.2. Manual ET/RBCX for Malaria

Reports from both developed and developing nations attribute manual ET/RBCX to improved outcomes for malaria patients [155,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165]. For example, one study found that parasite clearance times were significantly shorter in 25 malaria patients who had ET, compared with 31 controls [155]. However, we were unable to find a single report of manual ET/RBCX for Pk malaria. In addition, this procedure is rarely used in Africa, possibly because RBCX requires an apheresis machine, which is expensive. The benefits of manual ET may include the removal of (1) proinflammatory cytokines in plasma, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha; (2) iRBCs; (3) parasites; and (4) parasite toxins (e.g., hemozoin and glycosylphosphatidylinositol) [156,166,167]. By removing iRBCs, which can cytoadhere and cause microvascular obstruction, blood viscosity and oxygenation can improve. Manual ET/RBCX for severe malaria is an American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) category III indication—meaning the decision to perform the procedure needs to be individualized [168].
Unfortunately, manual ET/RBCX for malaria is rarely carefully reported or evaluated. Descriptions of the specific donor RBCs delivered to malaria patients (i.e., ABO blood type, presence of hemoglobin S, C, E, etc.) are almost always incomplete in case-reports and case-series [156,158,161]. Yet, malaria patients with sickle cell trait, thalassemia trait, blood group O, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PDd), and other malaria-resistant RBCs are known to have markedly better clinical outcomes [169,170,171,172,173]. In the 1940s, J.B.S. Haldane proposed the Malaria Hypothesis, in which heterozygotes of hematologic variant alleles (e.g., sickle cell trait) are more likely to survive malaria [174,175,176]. As evidence continues to mount in support of this hypothesis, it is recognized that “As a result of survival advantage against malaria, inherited red cell disorders are the most common monogenic diseases” [177].
However, when automated RBCX was used to treat a 13-year-old and two adult patients with CM, sickle cell trait RBC units were deliberately excluded [160]. (Note: Sickle-cell-trait RBC units are typically excluded for patients with hemoglobinopathies, infants, and fetuses requiring intrauterine transfusion [178]). None of the three patients were described as having a history of hemoglobinopathies, so it is unclear why sickle-cell-trait RBCs were excluded. Perhaps the clinicians did not have enough time to test the patients for hemoglobinopathies before the procedure. Delivering malaria-promoting RBCs, because malaria-resistant donor RBCs were unnecessarily excluded, may, unfortunately, substantially reduce the effectiveness of adjunctive manual ET/RBCX for malaria. This same practice was described in multiple cases of RBCX for pediatric patients past infancy without known hemoglobinopathies [159,165]. In one case-series of 3 patients, all tested negative for sickle cell disease [159]. It seems reasonable and prudent to assume—until proven otherwise—that inborn genetic RBC protection against malaria-induced death can be translated into therapeutic protection via RBCX.
Automated RBCX has major advantages over manual ET; it is less labor-intensive, faster, more efficient, and provides better hemodynamic stability [155]. Fortunately, when using a modern automated apheresis machine, the post-exchange hematocrit can be set to the value the clinician feels is the “optimal hematocrit” for the patient—a value that avoids the possibility of malaria-induced hyperviscosity. Manual ET removes whole blood, including plasma and pro-inflammatory cytokines, which may be harmful [179]. A single RBC volume exchange can eliminate about 60% of the patient’s pre-procedure RBCs, and a double exchange can eliminate about 85% [165,168,180]. There are risks with RBC transfusion [181], such as transfusion-transmitted malaria (TTM). However, because the risk of TTM is so low in the US, patients with TTM have been successfully treated with RBCX, which exposes them to additional RBC units [182,183]. Importantly, there is only a slight decline in concentrations of anti-malarial drugs after this procedure [184].

10. Therapeutically Rational Exchange Transfusion (T-REX)

T-REX refers to replacing a patient’s iRBCs with special invasion- or disease-resistant donor RBCs instead of nondescript standard-issue RBCs (usually any RBC unit that is ABO and RhD-compatible) that may contain Pf-promoting RBCs (such as blood group A, and hemoglobin A RBCs). Of major clinical importance, exposure to RBC alloantigens following pregnancy or transfusion can increase the likelihood of RBC alloimmunization against other alloantigens, which increases the probability of transfusion complications and reduces the availability of compatible RBCs for future transfusion [185,186,187,188,189,190]. As a result, patients who require chronic transfusions often receive RBCs matched for alloantigens beyond ABO and RhD to reduce the likelihood of RBC alloimmunization [191,192,193,194,195]. As patients with sickle cell disease are prone to developing alloantibodies and associated complications following RBC exposure [196,197,198,199,200,201,202], extended phenotype-matching RBC units (i.e., for alloantigens C, E, and K) for RBCX is routinely used when performing these procedures. Given the impact that blood group antigens can have on infectious disease outcomes [203,204,205], the transfusion practices for sickle cell disease provide a precedent for optimizing transfusion for malaria by thoughtfully selecting the most appropriate donor RBCs.
Previously, several T-REX options have been proposed as candidate non-drug adjuncts for Pf malaria [206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213] and babesiosis [214]. For example, blood-group-O RBCs have been proposed for use in T-REX to treat Pf malaria because blood-group-O patients have better clinical outcomes (including lower mortality), in part due to reduced rosetting (the binding of iRBCs to uRBCs) [170]. It seems prudent to determine if T-REX strategies can decrease morbidity and mortality when (1) appropriate treatment is delayed (e.g., IV artesunate is unavailable), (2) patients are at risk of developing severe malaria, or (3) drug-resistance is suspected. In addition, this non-drug adjunctive treatment may slow the emergence and spread of multidrug-resistant Plasmodium strains [215].
Here we propose use of Pk-resistant RBC variants currently available in blood banks. Blood donors with these RBC variants are eligible to donate RBCs, based on their responses to screening questions, whether they have adequate hemoglobin, testing negative for infectious disease, and other data. Because these variant RBCs are not thought to be harmful, they are not routinely tested for and are part of the blood bank’s inventory.

10.1. T-REX of Fy(a-b-) RBCs

Duffy is a seven transmembrane domain glycoprotein that binds chemokines in the C-X-C and C-C classes (e.g., CXCL10 and CCL2) [216,217]. The letters “C” and “X” refer to N-terminal cysteines or “other” amino acids, respectively. The FY*A allele leads to Fya expression, while the FY*B allele, caused by c.125G>A (coding DNA mutation at nucleotide 125 from guanine to adenine), leads to the expression of Fyb. Fy(a-b-) is the most common phenotype in Blacks and is usually caused by the mutation c.-67T>C in the erythroid promoter GATA-1-binding motif of FY*B. This allele is known as FY*BES, in which “ES” stands for “erythrocyte silent” [216]. This mutation blocks Fyb expression on RBCs only, but not other tissues. In contrast, Fy(a-b-) phenotype is extremely rare among White and Asian populations.
Pk parasites need to bind to the Duffy antigen [5,218,219] on the RBC surface before invading RBCs [61,220,221]. Therefore, Pk invasion-resistant Duffy-negative RBCs, also known as Fy(a-b-), could be delivered via manual ET/RBCX to prevent or treat severe malaria. However, three studies found that 0% of Malaysians had the Fy(a-b-) phenotype [218,222,223]. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in Fya and Fyb expression in Pk malaria patients versus controls [218,223]. The Fy(a-b-) phenotype is found in less than 5% of individuals in SEA or Asia [224,225]. Thus Fy(a-b-) RBC units would be difficult to obtain in this region.
It is important to consider that Malaysia has approximately 25 million visitors annually [12]. A 2014 study reviewed more than 66 articles of travelers acquiring Pk malaria [12]. So, clinicians across the world should be aware that febrile patients who traveled to Malaysia or neighboring countries may have Pk infection [226]. Interestingly, “The first natural infection of P knowlesi in a human was reported in 1965 in a man who returned to the USA after visiting peninsular Malaysia” [126]. The Fy(a-b-) phenotype is most common in Africa. One study found this phenotype in 6091 (53.6%) of 11,370 persons [225]. While no Pk cases have been reported in Africa, there is concern about Pk malaria patients presenting for care on the continent and the potential for misdiagnosis [227,228].
The Fy(a-b-) phenotype can be prevalent outside of Africa. Studies have found the Fy(a-b-) phenotype in 78.32% of southwestern Saudi Arabian blood donors [229]; 61% of eastern Saudi Arabian blood donors [230]; 48.69% of blood donors in south Gujarat, India [231]; and 48% of “black blood-donors in Southwestern Colombia” [232]. In addition, Pk malaria has been documented in four Indian states (Uttar Pradesh, Delhi, Bihar, Andaman, and Nicobar) [233,234,235].
One study found that 82.76% of the Jarawas tribe of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands were Fy(a-b-) [236]. Another study found that 11.9% of malaria patients on these islands were infected with Pk [235]. In addition, Pk was also found in Anopheles mosquitoes from these islands, which also harbor M. fascicularis [237]. By phenotyping RBCs from the RBC unit tubing segments using standard anti-Fya and anti-Fyb blood typing antibodies, Fy(a-b-) RBC units could be identified and used for anti-Pk T-REX.

10.2. T-REX of G6PDd RBCs

G6PD is an enzyme in the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), which leads to reduction of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP+) to NADPH [59,238]. This keeps glutathione in a reduced state to protect against oxidative damage. RBCs can only synthesize NADPH via the PPP, so G6PDd makes RBCs more sensitive to oxidative stress. G6PDd is an X-linked condition and considered to be one of the most common human enzyme deficiencies [59].
If Fy(a-b-) RBC units are scarce in given region (e.g., SEA), healthcare providers may consider the anti-Pk T-REX of G6PDd RBCs because they may reduce the risk of severe Pk malaria. A case–control study examined Pk malaria patients that presented to two primary referral hospitals in Malaysia from 2012 to 2015 [82]. The study included 229 patients with symptomatic Pk malaria mono-infections (confirmed by PCR) and 683 controls. G6PDd was present in 2 (0.9%) of 227 Pk malaria patients who were tested and 43 (6.5%) of 663 controls that were evaluated. The adjusted odds ratio was 0.20, and the p value was 0.045. To further support its potential benefit, there is evidence that the G6PDd phenotype was selected by human evolution because it reduces the risk of severe malaria and death [239,240,241].
Additional studies showing improved outcomes of G6PDd individuals with Pk malaria would strengthen the case for the T-REX of G6PDd RBCs. One study looked at baseline features of malaria patients [65]. G6PDd was found in 2.6%, 4.3%, and 5.6% of children < 12 years of age infected with Pk, Pf, and Pv, respectively. In addition, G6PDd was found in 1.1%, 4.3%, and 2.1% of adults infected with Pk, Pf, and Pv, respectively. Interestingly, G6PDd was least common in Pk patients of both age groups. It is worth noting that primaquine can trigger hemolysis in G6PDd individuals. However, this medication is not typically used to treat Pk malaria [39,112,242,243]. However, some Pk malaria patients (e.g., those co-infected with Pv and/or P. ovale) may be treated with primaquine to prevent relapse due to hypnozoites in the liver [233,243].
The WHO recently reclassified G6PD variants into four classes. Persons in Class A, B, C, and U have median G6PD activity <20%, <45%, 60–150%, and 45–60%, respectively [244]. Class C has no hemolysis, while Class B is associated with acute hemolysis, when there is a trigger (e.g., infection, consuming fava beans, or taking certain medicines). Thus, many G6PDd persons will go their entire life without symptoms or complications and never know they were G6PDd [244]. However, Class A is associated with chronic non-spherocytic hemolytic anemia. There are multiple factors that determine G6PD activity, including the exact genetic variant (>230 known) and whether the individual is male or female (X-linked condition).
Because most G6PDd individuals do not have chronic anemia, they have a hemoglobin level that is sufficient to allow for blood donation. Thus, persons with G6PDd donate blood in many countries. For example, about 7.6% of Thai blood donors, more than 16% of Iranian blood donors, and 25.5% of Nigeria blood donors were G6PDd [245,246,247,248]. In SEA and the surrounding area, G6PDd can be found in about 9% in the Negrito tribe of the Malaysian Orang Asli, 10.5% in the Chiang Mai Province of Thailand, 16.6% in the South Central Timor district of Eastern Indonesia, 25.0% in one region of Myanmar, as high as 25.7% in the Philippines, and 29.6% of the Kachin ethnic group at the China–Myanmar border [249,250,251,252,253,254]. In Malaysia and Thailand, the point-of-care fluorescent spot test (FST) has been used to detect G6PDd blood donors [248,255]. Because RBCs in the blood bag have G6PD activity, which correlates with the attached tubing segments [256], RBCs from the tubing segments can be tested using the FST to identify G6PDd RBC units for anti-Pk malaria T-REX.
The FST test starts by incubating blood with NADP and glucose-6-phosphate [257]. G6PD in the blood will lead to the production of 6-phosphogluconate and NADPH (which is fluorescent). This sample is then spotted onto filter paper. After it dries, it is viewed under UV light. The fluorescent intensity is proportional to the G6PD activity.
The safety of transfusing G6PDd RBCs needs to be considered. The WHO states that G6PDd blood donors should be allowed to donate if do not have a history of hemolysis [258]. However, they add that G6PDd RBCs should not be used for intrauterine transfusion of fetuses, neonatal ET, or transfusion of G6PDd individuals [258]. This is because G6PDd RBC units have been shown to have a reduced post-transfusion recovery. The 24 h post-transfusion recovery of the autologous transfusion of G6PDd versus non-G6PDd RBCs stored in additive solution formula 3 (AS-3) was 81.0% versus 86.8%, respectively [259]. The authors of the study state that the clinical consequences of this decline are unknown. They also mention the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requirement that 75% of the RBCs must survive 24 h after being transfused [260]. Despite the decreased survival of transfused G6PDd RBCs, the FDA requirements were fulfilled.
The safety of transfused G6PDd RBCs has been studied in SEA. In 2022, there was a randomized controlled clinical trial of G6PDd versus non-G6PDd RBC units transfused into patients with hypoproliferative anemia in Thailand [261]. The transfusion of G6PDd RBC units was associated with “mildly elevated indirect bilirubin after transfusion” [261,262] and decreased survival. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the change of hemoglobin, hematocrit, LDH, and haptoglobin between the groups, and long-term survival differences may not be clinically important when treating an acute infection [261]. In addition, no clinical symptoms or transfusion reactions were noted [261]. This data should alleviate some concerns about transfusing G6PDd RBCs. Furthermore, an African study showed that the manual ET of G6PDd RBCs (RBCs prevalent in malaria-endemic Nigeria) was safe and effective in hospitalized neonates, as there was no statistically significant difference in the post-procedure hemoglobin, hematocrit, serum bilirubin, or reticulocyte count [263]. Still, the risks and benefits of transfusing G6PDd RBCs in malaria patients should be carefully considered.

10.3. T-REX of Southeast Asian Ovalocytes

Southeast Asian Ovalocytosis (SAO) is caused by a 9 amino acid deletion in the band 3 protein (AE1), which is an anion exchange protein on RBCs [264,265]. Band 3 transports one Cl- anion in the opposite direction of an HCO3 ion across the RBC membrane [266]. Heterozygous SAO is mostly asymptomatic, but there is less efficient gas exchange, while homozygous SAO is a severe disease (with severe anemia) [267]. Thus, only heterozygous SAO is considered here. SAO RBCs do not have normal biconcave disc morphology (i.e., anucleate cells with a round area of central pallor). They can be macro-ovalocytes (large oval shapes), stomatocytes (slit-like area of central pallor), or stomato-ovalocytes [268]. SAO was thought to have evolved due to it offering protection against Pv and CM caused by Pf [210,264,269].
One in vitro study showed that the Pk invasion of RBCs from persons with SAO, also known as Melanesian elliptocytosis [270], was “markedly reduced” compared to controls [271]. In the first experiment, there were 20.6, 14.2, and 17.9 Pk ring forms per 100 RBCs for the controls and 0.4 and 0.5 for two SAO samples. A similar trend was noted in the second experiment. Importantly, all SAO RBCs and control RBCs expressed the Duffy antigen. The study also showed that SAO RBCs had fewer Pk merozoites attached to them, compared to the controls. However, only five samples were tested, and the findings have not been confirmed by others.
The prevalence of SAO can be substantial in parts of Malaysia, the Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, and Papua New Guinea [269]. The vast majority of individuals with SAO do not have hemolytic anemia, so they are likely to be eligible for blood donation. However, the prevalence of SAO RBCs in blood banks is not well-studied. SAO RBC units could be identified using blood bag tubing segments to create a blood smear to identify the unique RBC appearance [210]. To our knowledge, blood donors are not routinely tested for SAO, and persons with SAO are not deferred from donating. Clinical studies showing improved outcomes of individuals with SAO with Pk malaria would strengthen the case for T-REX of SAO RBCs. Table 1 shows a summary of RBC variants that might be Pk-resistant.

10.4. Performing Anti-Pk T-REX

To perform anti-Pk T-REX, healthcare professionals will need to ask blood bank staff if they can provide Fy(a-b-), G6PDd, and/or SAO RBC units. Using tubing segments from RBC units, Fy(a-b-), G6PDd, and SAO RBCs can be identified using standard blood-typing reagents, the rapid FST test, and based on their unique microscopic appearance, respectively. The availability of these units depends on the blood donor population demographics and the geographic location of the blood bank. Importantly, the identification of these Pk-resistant RBC units can be concomitant as the patient awaits and then obtains the vascular access needed for the procedure.
The RBC units should be transfused in a specific order. Manual ET/RBCX slowly and continuously removes RBCs from the patient, while RBC units are slowly and continuously transfused. So, the first transfused RBC unit will have a higher percentage of RBCs removed than the last unit transfused. If only a limited number of Pk-resistant RBC units can be obtained, it is advisable to start with transfusion of standard-issue RBCs at the beginning of the procedure, followed by Pk-resistant RBCs at the end. This sequence will minimize the removal of the Pk-resistant RBCs during the procedure.

10.5. Timeline of Therapeutic Benefits of Anti-Pk T-REX

It is important to consider the timing of Pk’s asexual replication, the therapeutic benefit of T-REX and antimalarials, and patient deaths. If T-REX of Fy(a-b-) RBCs is performed, then the circulating uRBCs and iRBCs will be removed during the ~2 h procedure. Because sequestered iRBCs adhere to the endothelium, they will not be removed by T-REX. However, over the next 24 h (one asexual life cycle), the schizonts will rupture, releasing merozoites and reducing sequestration. The merozoites will not be able to invade Fy(a-b-) RBCs. Thus, the benefits of T-REX would be realized during the procedure, within 24 h (one asexual lifecycle), and during subsequent asexual life cycles. This is important because a case-series about Pk malaria fatalities found that the median time from admission to death was 41 h [41]. So, T-REX would likely provide a therapeutic benefit before it is too late.
The timing of the benefit of antimalarials is complex. This topic came up in the South East Asian Quinine Artesunate Malaria Trial (SEQUAMAT) and African Quinine Artesunate Malaria Trial (AQUAMAT), in which clinical outcomes from quinine and artesunate treatment were compared in patients with severe Pf malaria [272,273]. Both quinine and artesunate can target sequestered iRBCs, but only artesunate can kill ring stages in circulating iRBCs, which prevents them from maturing and sequestering in venules [272,273]. This may explain why clinical outcomes were better with IV artesunate than IV quinine. The effectiveness of an antimalarial is thought to depend on how well the drug can kill parasites, if killed parasites in iRBCs can still remain in the blood vessels, and if killed parasites in iRBCs can still cytoadhere or sequester [274]. A study discovered that despite Pf parasites inside of RBCs being killed by drugs, these iRBCs can still cytoadhere for hours because PfEMP-1, a key molecule this process, remains on the surface of iRBCs [275]. So, parasite clearance (i.e., iRBC clearance) may be a better measure of benefit than parasite death. In addition, drug resistance, which varies based on location, can slow the rate of parasite clearance [276]. A randomized controlled clinical trial of parasite clearance in Ugandan children treated with IV artesunate found that the median time to clear half of the parasites was 4.8 h, suggesting that artemisinin resistance had not developed in this region [277]. Still, RBCX, which typically takes ~2 h, can remove more than half of the patient’s RBCs. Thus, the kinetics of RBCX seem faster than IV artesunate.

10.6. After Anti-Pk T-REX

After the patient’s malaria resolves, there is no need to perform RBCX to remove the transfused Fy(a-b-), G6PDd, or SAO RBCs. This is because these RBCs were donated by healthy non-anemic persons who met blood donor eligibility requirements. However, the duration of survival of Fy(a-b-), G6PDd, and SAO RBCs is worth discussing. Healthy human RBCs can circulate for about 120 days [278]. Fy(a-b-) RBCs should be able to circulate for a long length of time because this phenotype is not associated with hemolysis. However, G6PDd and SAO RBCs may have reduced survival compared to Fy(a-b-) RBCs, but their exact lifespan appears to be unknown [278,279].
If healthcare professionals publish anti-Pk T-REX case reports with RBCX parameters and donor and recipient RBC variables, its effectiveness could be evaluated in a meta-analysis. For example, a 75 kg O+ non-G6PDd patient with Pk malaria may receive automated T-REX using two standard-issue O+ RBC units, followed by two O+ G6PDd RBC units, and then two O+ Fy(a-b-) RBC units. The patient’s clinical status and laboratory values (e.g., hematocrit, parasitemia) before and after T-REX can be reported. For a more complete list of procedure parameters to report, view reference [280].

11. ABO Blood Group and Pk Malaria

Blood group O has been shown to reduce the risk of severe Pf malaria, which likely explains its high prevalence in Pf malaria “hot-zones” [173,209,281]. We were only able to identify one study that collected data on blood-group-O Pk malaria patients [66]. This study found blood group O in 28%, 12.5%, and 9.5% of Pk, Pf, and Pv malaria patients admitted to a Malaysian hospital. However, the prevalence of blood group O in non-malaria patients was not measured. So, it is not known if blood group O provides some benefit to Pk malaria patients. Studies assessing the impact of ABO blood group on Pk malaria would be beneficial. If blood group O protects against severe Pk malaria, it could be a feasible anti-Pk malaria T-REX option. This is because (1) blood group O is a “universal” blood type, (2) it is found in about 30% or more of the global population, and (3) no additional testing is required.

12. Conclusions

Anti-Pk T-REX is a theoretical optimization of manual ET/RBCX, in which Pk-iRBCs are replaced with Pk-resistant RBCs. Fy(a-b-) and SAO RBCs are likely to resist Pk invasion, while G6PDd RBCs are likely to reduce the risk of severe Pk malaria. Anti-Pk T-REX may be beneficial if IV artesunate or other antimalarial medications are not readily available, if patients are likely to progress to severe disease, or if parasite drug-resistance develops.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.P.J.; Investigation, R.P.J., S.-C.W., P.G.J. and S.R.S.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, R.P.J., S.-C.W., P.G.J. and S.R.S.; Writing—Review & Editing, R.P.J., S.-C.W., P.G.J. and S.R.S.; Supervision, P.G.J. and S.R.S.; Funding Acquisition, R.P.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by K12 HL141953 of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to Ryan Jajosky.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the constructive feedback on this manuscript provided by Kashyap R. Patel of Brigham and Women’s Hospital.

Conflicts of Interest

Ryan Jajosky is CEO of Biconcavity Inc. Philip Jajosky is CMO of Biconcavity Inc.

Abbreviation

AKI = Acute kidney injury, AMA 1 = apical membrane antigen 1, ARDS = acute respiratory distress syndrome, ASFA = American Society for Apheresis, CDC = Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CM = cerebral malaria, CSP = circumsporozoite protein, DBP = Duffy-binding protein, ET = exchange transfusion, FCR = fraction of cells remaining, FST = fluorescent spot test, Fy = Duffy, Fy(a-b-) = Duffy-negative, G6PDd = glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, h = hour(s), iRBC = infected red blood cell, IV = intravenous, LDH = lactate dehydrogenase, NBP = normocyte-binding protein, PCR = polymerase chain reaction, Pf = Plasmodium falciparum, Pk = Plasmodium knowlesi, Pm = Plasmodium malariae, Pv = Plasmodium vivax, RBC = red blood cell, RBCX = red blood cell exchange, RDT = rapid diagnostic test, RTS,S = Plasmodium falciparum malaria vaccine, SAO = Southeast Asian ovalocytosis, SEA = Southeast Asia, SICA = schizont-infected cell agglutination, T-REX = therapeutically rational exchange, uRBC = uninfected red blood cell, WHO = World Health Organization.

References

  1. Antinori, S.; Galimberti, L.; Milazzo, L.; Corbellino, M. Plasmodium knowlesi: The emerging zoonotic malaria parasite. Acta Tropica. 2013, 125, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Knowles, R.; Gupta, B.M.D. A Study of Monkey-Malaria, and Its Experimental Transmission to Man. Ind. Med. Gaz. 1932, 67, 301–320. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Kantele, A.; Jokiranta, T.S. Review of Cases With the Emerging Fifth Human Malaria Parasite, Plasmodium knowlesi. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 52, 1356–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. White, N.J. Plasmodium knowlesi: The Fifth Human Malaria Parasite. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 46, 172–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lim, K.L.; Amir, A.; Lau, Y.L.; Fong, M.Y. The Duffy binding protein (PkDBPαII) of Plasmodium knowlesi from Peninsular Malaysia and Malaysian Borneo show different binding activity level to human erythrocytes. Malar. J. 2017, 16, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Etymologia: Plasmodium knowlesi. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 10. [CrossRef]
  7. Mahittikorn, A.; Masangkay, F.R.; Kotepui, K.U.; Milanez, G.D.J.; Kotepui, M. Comparison of Plasmodium ovale curtisi and Plasmodium ovale wallikeri infections by a meta-analysis approach. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, W.-C.; Cheong, F.W.; Amir, A.; Lai, M.Y.; Tan, J.H.; Phang, W.K.; Shahari, S.; Lau, Y.-L. Plasmodium knowlesi: The game changer for malaria eradication. Malar. J. 2022, 21, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lempang, M.E.P.; Dewayanti, F.K.; Syahrani, L.; Permana, D.H.; Malaka, R.; Asih, P.B.S.; Syafruddin, D. Primate malaria: An emerging challenge of zoonotic malaria in Indonesia. One Heal. 2022, 14, 100389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ministry of Health Malaysia. Health Indicators. Available online: https://www.moh.gov.my/index.php/pages/view/58?mid=19 (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  11. Aftab, H.; Kemp, M.; Stensvold, C.R.; Nielsen, H.V.; Jakobsen, M.M.; Porskrog, A.; Dessau, R.B. First molecular documented case of a rarely reported parasite: Plasmodium knowlesi infection in Denmark in a traveller returning from Malaysian Borneo. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 53, 102580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Müller, M.; Schlagenhauf, P. Plasmodium knowlesi in travellers, update 2014. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 22, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mace, K.E.; Lucchi, N.W.; Tan, K.R. Malaria Surveillance—United States, 2018. MMWR. Surveill. Summ. 2022, 71, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lo, C.K.-F.; Plewes, K.; Sharma, S.; Low, A.; Su, L.D.; Belga, S.; Salazar, F.V.; Hajek, J.; Morshed, M.; Hogan, C.A. Plasmodium knowlesi Infection in Traveler Returning to Canada from the Philippines, 2023. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2023, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yap, N.J.; Hossain, H.; Nada-Raja, T.; Ngui, R.; Muslim, A.; Hoh, B.-P.; Khaw, L.T.; Kadir, K.A.; Divis, P.C.S.; Vythilingam, I.; et al. Natural Human Infections with Plasmodium cynomolgi, P. inui, and 4 other Simian Malaria Parasites, Malaysia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 2187–2191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ramasamy, R. Zoonotic Malaria—Global Overview and Research and Policy Needs. Front. Public Heal. 2014, 2, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Davidson, G.; Chua, T.H.; Cook, A.; Speldewinde, P.; Weinstein, P. Defining the ecological and evolutionary drivers of Plasmodium knowlesi transmission within a multi-scale framework. Malar. J. 2019, 18, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Fornace, K.M.; Laporta, G.Z.; Vythilingham, I.; Chua, T.H.; Ahmed, K.; Jeyaprakasam, N.K.; Duarte, A.M.R.d.C.; Amir, A.; Phang, W.K.; Drakeley, C.; et al. Simian malaria: A narrative review on emergence, epidemiology and threat to global malaria elimination. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. van de Straat, B.; Sebayang, B.; Grigg, M.J.; Staunton, K.; Garjito, T.A.; Vythilingam, I.; Russell, T.L.; Burkot, T.R. Zoonotic malaria transmission and land use change in Southeast Asia: What is known about the vectors. Malar. J. 2022, 21, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Byrne, I.; Aure, W.; Manin, B.O.; Vythilingam, I.; Ferguson, H.M.; Drakeley, C.J.; Chua, T.H.; Fornace, K.M. Environmental and spatial risk factors for the larval habitats of Plasmodium knowlesi vectors in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Malijan, R.P.B.; Mechan, F.; Braganza, J.C.; Valle, K.M.R.; Salazar, F.V.; Torno, M.M.; Aure, W.E.; Bacay, B.A.; Espino, F.E.; Torr, S.J.; et al. The seasonal dynamics and biting behavior of potential Anopheles vectors of Plasmodium knowlesi in Palawan, Philippines. Parasites Vectors 2021, 14, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Moyes, C.L.; Shearer, F.M.; Huang, Z.; Wiebe, A.; Gibson, H.S.; Nijman, V.; Mohd-Azlan, J.; Brodie, J.F.; Malaivijitnond, S.; Linkie, M.; et al. Predicting the geographical distributions of the macaque hosts and mosquito vectors of Plasmodium knowlesi malaria in forested and non-forested areas. Parasites Vectors 2016, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Naserrudin, N.A.; Hod, R.; Jeffree, M.S.; Ahmed, K.; Hassan, M.R. The Emerging Threat of Plasmodium knowlesi Malaria Infection: A Concept Paper on the Vulnerable Factors in Human. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ooi, C.H.; Phang, W.K.; Liew, J.W.K.; Atroosh, W.M.; Lau, Y.L. Epidemiology of indigenous Plasmodium knowlesi infection in Sarawak, 2011–2019. Trop. Med. Int. Heal. 2022, 27, 705–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Boissière, A.; Tchioffo, M.T.; Bachar, D.; Abate, L.; Marie, A.; Nsango, S.E.; Shahbazkia, H.R.; Awono-Ambene, P.H.; Levashina, E.A.; Christen, R.; et al. Midgut Microbiota of the Malaria Mosquito Vector Anopheles gambiae and Interactions with Plasmodium falciparum Infection. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tan, C.H.; Vythilingam, I.; Matusop, A.; Chan, S.T.; Singh, B. Bionomics of Anopheles latens in Kapit, Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo in relation to the transmission of zoonotic simian malaria parasite Plasmodium knowlesi. Malar. J. 2008, 7, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chin, W.; Alpert, E.; Collins, W.E.; Jeter, M.H.; Contacos, P.G. Experimental Mosquito-Transmission of Plasmodium Knowlesi to Man and Monkey. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1968, 17, 355–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fornace, K.M.; Topazian, H.M.; Routledge, I.; Asyraf, S.; Jelip, J.; Lindblade, K.A.; Jeffree, M.S.; Cuenca, P.R.; Bhatt, S.; Ahmed, K.; et al. No evidence of sustained nonzoonotic Plasmodium knowlesi transmission in Malaysia from modelling malaria case data. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Singh, B.; Daneshvar, C. Human Infections and Detection of Plasmodium knowlesi. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 26, 165–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yapabandara, A.M.G.M.; Mota, M.D.R.d.F.; Sarmento, R.; Bosco, J.D.; Wickremasinghe, R. From malaria control to elimination within a decade: Lessons learned from Timor Leste, a newly independent country. Malar. J. 2020, 19, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. CIA. The World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency. 2022. Available online: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/about/archives/2022/ (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  32. WHO. World Malaria Report 2022; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022; Available online: https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/reports/world-malaria-report-2022 (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  33. Canuckguy. File: Southeast Asia Blank Political Map.svg: Wikimedia. 2016. Available online: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Southeast_Asia_blank_political_map.svg (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  34. Austin, S.C.; Stolley, P.D.; Lasky, T. The history of malariotherapy for neurosyphilis. Modern parallels. JAMA 1992, 268, 516–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Stamm, L.V.; Gherardini, F.C.; Parrish, E.A.; Moomaw, C.R. Heat shock response of spirochetes. Infect. Immun. 1991, 59, 1572–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Benoit, S.; Posey, J.E.; Chenoweth, M.R.; Gherardini, F.C. Treponema pallidum 3-Phosphoglycerate Mutase Is a Heat-Labile Enzyme That May Limit the Maximum Growth Temperature for the Spirochete. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 4702–4708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chopra, R.N.; Das Gupta, B.M. A Preliminary Note on the Treatment of Neuro-Syphilis with Monkey Malaria. Ind. Med. Gaz. 1936, 71, 187–189. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. van Rooyen, C.E.; Pile, G.R. Observations on infection by plasmodium knowlesi (ape malaria) in the treatment of general paralysis of the insane. Br. Med. J. 1935, 2, 662–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Treatment of Malaria: Guidelines for Clinicians (United States): The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2023. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/diagnosis_treatment/clinicians1.html (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  40. Tintó-Font, E.; Michel-Todó, L.; Russell, T.J.; Casas-Vila, N.; Conway, D.J.; Bozdech, Z.; Llinás, M.; Cortés, A. A heat-shock response regulated by the PfAP2-HS transcription factor protects human malaria parasites from febrile temperatures. Nat. Microbiol. 2021, 6, 1163–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Rajahram, G.S.; Cooper, D.J.; William, T.; Grigg, M.J.; Anstey, N.M.; Barber, B.E. Deaths From Plasmodium knowlesi Malaria: Case Series and Systematic Review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 69, 1703–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Malaria Biology: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/about/biology/index.html (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  43. Quansah, E.; Pappoe, F.; Shen, J.; Liu, M.; Yang, S.; Yu, L.; Zhang, C. ApiAP2 Gene-Network Regulates Gametocytogenesis in Plasmodium Parasites. Cell. Microbiol. 2022, 2022, 5796578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hart, M.N.; Mohring, F.; DonVito, S.M.; Thomas, J.A.; Muller-Sienerth, N.; Wright, G.J.; Knuepfer, E.; Saibil, H.R.; Moon, R.W. Sequential roles for red blood cell binding proteins enable phased commitment to invasion for malaria parasites. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 4619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ng, Y.L.; Lee, W.-C.; Lau, Y.-L.; Fong, M.Y. The Impact of Geographical Variation in Plasmodium knowlesi Apical Membrane Protein 1 (PkAMA-1) on Invasion Dynamics of P. knowlesi. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mitchell, G.H.; Thomas, A.W.; Margos, G.; Dluzewski, A.R.; Bannister, L.H. Apical Membrane Antigen 1, a Major Malaria Vaccine Candidate, Mediates the Close Attachment of Invasive Merozoites to Host Red Blood Cells. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 154–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Muh, F.; Lee, S.-K.; Hoque, M.R.; Han, J.-H.; Park, J.-H.; Firdaus, E.R.; Moon, R.W.; Lau, Y.L.; Han, E.-T. In vitro invasion inhibition assay using antibodies against Plasmodium knowlesi Duffy binding protein alpha and apical membrane antigen protein 1 in human erythrocyte-adapted P. knowlesi A1-H.1 strain. Malar. J. 2018, 17, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ng, Y.L.; Fong, M.Y.; Lau, Y.L. Genetic diversity of the full length apical membrane antigen-1 of Plasmodium knowlesi clinical isolates from Peninsular Malaysia. Trop. Biomed. 2021, 38, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Vulliez-Le Normand, B.; Faber, B.W.; Saul, F.A.; van der Eijk, M.; Thomas, A.W.; Singh, B.; Kocken, C.H.; Bentley, G.A. Crystal structure of Plasmodium knowlesi apical membrane antigen 1 and its complex with an invasion-inhibitory monoclonal antibody. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Mahdi Abdel Hamid, M.; Remarque, E.J.; van Duivenvoorde, L.M.; van der Werff, N.; Walraven, V.; Faber, B.W.; Kocken, C.H.M.; Thomas, A.W. Vaccination with Plasmodium knowlesi AMA1 Formulated in the Novel Adjuvant Co-Vaccine HT™ Protects against Blood-Stage Challenge in Rhesus Macaques. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Nirmolia, T.; Ahmed, M.A.; Sathishkumar, V.; Sarma, N.P.; Bhattacharyya, D.R.; Mohapatra, P.K.; Bansal, D.; Bharti, P.K.; Sehgal, R.; Mahanta, J.; et al. Genetic diversity of Plasmodium falciparum AMA-1 antigen from the Northeast Indian state of Tripura and comparison with global sequences: Implications for vaccine development. Malar. J. 2022, 21, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. 008 FY Alleles: International Society of Blood Transfusion. 2021. Available online: https://www.isbtweb.org/resource/008fy.html (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  53. Crosnier, C.; Bustamante, L.Y.; Bartholdson, S.J.; Bei, A.K.; Theron, M.; Uchikawa, M.; Mboup, S.; Ndir, O.; Kwiatkowski, D.P.; Duraisingh, M.T.; et al. Basigin is a receptor essential for erythrocyte invasion by Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 2011, 480, 534–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Miller, L.H.; Mason, S.J.; Dvorak, J.A.; McGinniss, M.H.; Rothman, I.K. Erythrocyte receptors for (Plasmodium knowlesi) malaria: Duffy blood group determinants. Science 1975, 189, 561–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Egan, E.S.; Jiang, R.H.; Moechtar, M.A.; Barteneva, N.S.; Weekes, M.P.; Nobre, L.V.; Gygi, S.P.; Paulo, J.A.; Frantzreb, C.; Tani, Y.; et al. Malaria. A forward genetic screen identifies erythrocyte CD55 as essential for Plasmodium falciparum invasion. Science 2015, 348, 711–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mohd Bukhari, F.D.; Lau, Y.L.; Fong, M.Y. Erythrocyte Binding Activity of PkDBPαII of Plasmodium knowlesi Isolated from High and Low Parasitemia Cases. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2020, 104, 680–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Moon, R.W.; Sharaf, H.; Hastings, C.H.; Ho, Y.S.; Nair, M.B.; Rchiad, Z.; Knuepfer, E.; Ramaprasad, A.; Mohring, F.; Amir, A.; et al. Normocyte-binding protein required for human erythrocyte invasion by the zoonotic malaria parasite Plasmodium knowlesi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 7231–7236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mohring, F.; Hart, M.N.; Rawlinson, T.A.; Henrici, R.; Charleston, J.A.; Diez Benavente, E.; Patel, A.; Hall, J.; Almond, N.; Campino, S.; et al. Rapid and iterative genome editing in the malaria parasite Plasmodium knowlesi provides new tools for P. vivax research. eLife 2019, 8, e45829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Jajosky, R.P.; Wu, S.C.; Zheng, L.; Jajosky, A.N.; Jajosky, P.G.; Josephson, C.D.; Hollenhorst, M.A.; Sackstein, R.; Cummings, R.D.; Arthur, C.M.; et al. ABO blood group antigens and differential glycan expression: Perspective on the evolution of common human enzyme deficiencies. iScience 2023, 26, 105798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Amir, A.; Russell, B.; Liew, J.W.K.; Moon, R.W.; Fong, M.Y.; Vythilingam, I.; Subramaniam, V.; Snounou, G.; Lau, Y.L. Invasion characteristics of a Plasmodium knowlesi line newly isolated from a human. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Lim, C.; Hansen, E.; DeSimone, T.M.; Moreno, Y.; Junker, K.; Bei, A.; Brugnara, C.; Buckee, C.O.; Duraisingh, M.T. Expansion of host cellular niche can drive adaptation of a zoonotic malaria parasite to humans. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Leong, Y.W.; Russell, B.; Malleret, B.; Rénia, L. Erythrocyte tropism of malarial parasites: The reticulocyte appeal. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1022828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Moon, R.W.; Hall, J.; Rangkuti, F.; Ho, Y.S.; Almond, N.; Mitchell, G.H.; Pain, A.; Holder, A.A.; Blackman, M.J. Adaptation of the genetically tractable malaria pathogen Plasmodium knowlesi to continuous culture in human erythrocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 531–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Reticulocyte Count: Cleveland Clinic. 2022. Available online: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diagnostics/22787-reticulocyte-count (accessed on 12 September 2023).
  65. Grigg, M.J.; William, T.; Barber, B.E.; Rajahram, G.S.; Menon, J.; Schimann, E.; Piera, K.; Wilkes, C.S.; Patel, K.; Chandna, A.; et al. Age-Related Clinical Spectrum of Plasmodium knowlesi Malaria and Predictors of Severity. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 67, 350–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Daneshvar, C.; Davis, T.M.; Cox-Singh, J.; Rafa’ee, M.Z.; Zakaria, S.K.; Divis, P.C.; Singh, B. Clinical and laboratory features of human Plasmodium knowlesi infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 49, 852–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Barber, B.E.; William, T.; Grigg, M.J.; Menon, J.; Auburn, S.; Marfurt, J.; Anstey, N.M.; Yeo, T.W. A prospective comparative study of knowlesi, falciparum, and vivax malaria in Sabah, Malaysia: High proportion with severe disease from Plasmodium knowlesi and Plasmodium vivax but no mortality with early referral and artesunate therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 56, 383–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Barber, B.E.; Russell, B.; Grigg, M.J.; Zhang, R.; William, T.; Amir, A.; Lau, Y.L.; Chatfield, M.D.; Dondorp, A.M.; Anstey, N.M.; et al. Reduced red blood cell deformability in Plasmodium knowlesi malaria. Blood Adv. 2018, 2, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liu, B.; Blanch, A.J.; Namvar, A.; Carmo, O.; Tiash, S.; Andrew, D.; Hanssen, E.; Rajagopal, V.; Dixon, M.W.A.; Tilley, L. Multimodal analysis of Plasmodium knowlesi-infected erythrocytes reveals large invaginations, swelling of the host cell, and rheological defects. Cell. Microbiol. 2019, 21, e13005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. CDC. DPDx—Laboratory Identification of Parasites of Public Health Concern—Malaria. 2020. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/dpdx/malaria/index.html#tabs-2-3 (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  71. Lee, K.-S.; Cox-Singh, J.; Singh, B. Morphological features and differential counts of Plasmodium knowles i parasites in naturally acquired human infections. Malar. J. 2009, 8, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Paul, A.; Ramdani, G.; Tatu, U.; Langsley, G.; Natarajan, V. Studying the rigidity of red blood cells induced by Plasmodium falciparum infection. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Anstey, N.M.; Grigg, M.J.; Rajahram, G.S.; Cooper, D.J.; William, T.; Kho, S.; Barber, B.E. Knowlesi malaria: Human risk factors, clinical spectrum, and pathophysiology. Adv. Parasitol. 2021, 113, 1–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Peterson, M.S.; Joyner, C.J.; Lapp, S.A.; Brady, J.A.; Wood, J.S.; Cabrera-Mora, M.; Saney, C.L.; Fonseca, L.L.; Cheng, W.T.; Jiang, J.; et al. Plasmodium knowlesi Cytoadhesion Involves SICA Variant Proteins. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 888496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Lee, W.C.; Shahari, S.; Nguee, S.Y.T.; Lau, Y.L.; Rénia, L. Cytoadherence Properties of Plasmodium knowlesi-Infected Erythrocytes. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 804417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Craig, A.G.; Khairul, M.F.; Patil, P.R. Cytoadherence and severe malaria. Malays. J. Med. Sci. 2012, 19, 5–18. [Google Scholar]
  77. Chuang, H.; Sakaguchi, M.; Lucky, A.B.; Yamagishi, J.; Katakai, Y.; Kawai, S.; Kaneko, O. SICA-mediated cytoadhesion of Plasmodium knowlesi-infected red blood cells to human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 14942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Cox-Singh, J.; Hiu, J.; Lucas, S.B.; Divis, P.C.; Zulkarnaen, M.; Chandran, P.; Wong, K.T.; Adem, P.; Zaki, S.R.; Singh, B.; et al. Severe malaria—A case of fatal Plasmodium knowlesi infection with post-mortem findings: A case report. Malar. J. 2010, 9, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. White, N.J. Malaria parasite clearance. Malar. J. 2017, 16, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. WHO. Severe Malaria. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2014, 19, 7–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Adukpo, S.; Kusi, K.A.; Ofori, M.F.; Tetteh, J.K.; Amoako-Sakyi, D.; Goka, B.Q.; Adjei, G.O.; Edoh, D.A.; Akanmori, B.D.; Gyan, B.A.; et al. High plasma levels of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 are associated with cerebral malaria. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e84181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Grigg, M.J.; Cox, J.; William, T.; Jelip, J.; Fornace, K.M.; Brock, P.M.; von Seidlein, L.; Barber, B.E.; Anstey, N.M.; Yeo, T.W.; et al. Individual-level factors associated with the risk of acquiring human Plasmodium knowlesi malaria in Malaysia: A case-control study. Lancet Planet Health 2017, 1, e97–e104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Kotepui, M.; Kotepui, K.U.; Milanez, G.D.; Masangkay, F.R. Prevalence of severe Plasmodium knowlesi infection and risk factors related to severe complications compared with non-severe P. knowlesi and severe P. falciparum malaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2020, 9, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Barber, B.E.; Grigg, M.J.; William, T.; Piera, K.A.; Boyle, M.J.; Yeo, T.W.; Anstey, N.M. Effects of Aging on Parasite Biomass, Inflammation, Endothelial Activation, Microvascular Dysfunction and Disease Severity in Plasmodium knowlesi and Plasmodium falciparum Malaria. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 215, 1908–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Chaudhuri, A.; Nielsen, S.; Elkjaer, M.-L.; Zbrzezna, V.; Fang, F.; Pogo, A.O. Detection of Duffy Antigen in the Plasma Membranes and Caveolae of Vascular Endothelial and Epithelial Cells of Nonerythroid Organs. Blood 1997, 89, 701–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Nielsen, S.; Chaudhuri, A.; Pogo, A.O. Which Are the Nonerythroid Cells That Constitutively Express the Duffy Antigen? Blood 1997, 90, 3231–3232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Phyo, A.P.; Dahal, P.; Mayxay, M.; Ashley, E.A. Clinical impact of vivax malaria: A collection review. PLoS Med. 2022, 19, e1003890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Hu, T.H.; Rosli, N.; Mohamad, D.S.A.; Kadir, K.A.; Ching, Z.H.; Chai, Y.H.; Ideris, N.N.; Ting, L.S.C.; Dihom, A.A.; Kong, S.L.; et al. A comparison of the clinical, laboratory and epidemiological features of two divergent subpopulations of Plasmodium knowlesi. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 20117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. McMorran, B.J. Immune role of platelets in malaria. ISBT Sci. Ser. 2019, 14, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. van Wolfswinkel, M.E.; Hesselink, D.A.; Zietse, R.; Hoorn, E.J.; van Genderen, P.J. Hyponatraemia in imported malaria is common and associated with disease severity. Malar. J. 2010, 9, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Ngernna, S.; Rachaphaew, N.; Thammapalo, S.; Prikchoo, P.; Kaewnah, O.; Manopwisedjaroen, K.; Phumchuea, K.; Suansomjit, C.; Roobsoong, W.; Sattabongkot, J.; et al. Case Report: Case Series of Human Plasmodium knowlesi Infection on the Southern Border of Thailand. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2019, 101, 1397–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Nowak, S.P.; Zmora, P.; Pielok, Ł.; Kuszel, Ł.; Kierzek, R.; Stefaniak, J.; Paul, M. Case of Plasmodium knowlesi Malaria in Poland Linked to Travel in Southeast Asia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 25, 1772–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Fan, L.; Lee, S.Y.; Koay, E.; Harkensee, C. Plasmodium knowlesi infection: A diagnostic challenge. BMJ Case Rep. 2013, 2013, bcr2013009558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Rajahram, G.S.; Barber, B.E.; Yeo, T.W.; Tan, W.W.; William, T. Case report: Fatal Plasmodium knowlesi malaria following an atypical clinical presentation and delayed diagnosis. Med. J. Malays. 2013, 68, 71–72. [Google Scholar]
  95. Takaya, S.; Kutsuna, S.; Suzuki, T.; Komaki-Yasuda, K.; Kano, S.; Ohmagari, N. Case Report: Plasmodium knowlesi Infection with Rhabdomyolysis in a Japanese Traveler to Palawan, the Philippines. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2018, 99, 967–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Che Rahim, M.J.; Mohammad, N.; Besari, A.M.; Wan Ghazali, W.S. Severe Plasmodium knowlesi with dengue coinfection. BMJ Case Rep. 2017, 2017, bcr2016218480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Chong, S.E.; Mohamad Zaini, R.H.; Suraiya, S.; Lee, K.T.; Lim, J.A. The dangers of accepting a single diagnosis: Case report of concurrent Plasmodium knowlesi malaria and dengue infection. Malar. J. 2017, 16, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ong, C.W.M.; Lee, S.Y.; Koh, W.H.; Ooi, E.-E.; Tambyah, P.A. Monkey Malaria in Humans: A Diagnostic Dilemma with Conflicting Laboratory Data. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2009, 80, 927–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Mackroth, M.S.; Tappe, D.; Tannich, E.; Addo, M.; Rothe, C. Rapid-Antigen Test Negative Malaria in a Traveler Returning From Thailand, Molecularly Diagnosed as Plasmodium knowlesi. Open Forum. Infect. Dis. 2016, 3, ofw039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. CDC. Dengue Testing Guidance. 2020. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/dengue/healthcare-providers/testing/testing-guidance.html (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  101. WHO. Dengue and Severe Dengue. 2023. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dengue-and-severe-dengue (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  102. CDC. Dengue and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/dengue/resources/healthcarepract.pdf (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  103. CDC. Dengue Clinical Presentation; CDC: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  104. Wong, C.K.; Md Fuzi, N.H.; Baherin, M.F.; Lee, H.G. A case of co-infection: First reported case of severe plasmodium knowlesi malaria and dengue co-infection in Sabah, Malaysia. Med. J. Malays. 2020, 75, 171–172. [Google Scholar]
  105. CDC. Typhoid Fever and Paratyphoid Fever. 2018. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/typhoid-fever/index.html (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  106. CDC. Yellow Book: Typhoid & Paratyphoid Fever. 2024. Available online: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/yellowbook/2024/infections-diseases/typhoid-and-paratyphoid-fever (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  107. Marchello, C.S.; Birkhold, M.; Crump, J.A. Complications and mortality of typhoid fever: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Infect. 2020, 81, 902–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. CDC. Yellow Book: Leptospirosis. 2024. Available online: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/yellowbook/2024/infections-diseases/leptospirosis (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  109. Karpagam, K.B.; Ganesh, B. Leptospirosis: A neglected tropical zoonotic infection of public health importance—An updated review. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2020, 39, 835–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Management Guidelines of Malaria in Malaysia: Ministry of Health Malaysia. 2013. Available online: https://www.moh.gov.my/index.php/file_manager/dl_item/554756755a584a69615852686269394859584a70637942515957356b645746754c31426c626d6431636e567a595734675330567a615768686447467549435967613246335957786862694277655774706443394e515535425230564e52553555583064565355524654456c4f52564e6654305a665455464d51564a4a5156394a546c394e5155784257564e4a515335775a475978587935775a47593d (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  111. Barber, B.E.; Grigg, M.J.; Cooper, D.J.; van Schalkwyk, D.A.; William, T.; Rajahram, G.S.; Anstey, N.M. Clinical management of Plasmodium knowlesi malaria. Adv. Parasitol. 2021, 113, 45–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Algorithm for Diagnosis and Treatment of Malaria in the United States: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2023. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/resources/pdf/Malaria_Managment_Algorithm_202208.pdf (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  113. Tan, A.F.; Sakam, S.S.B.; Rajahram, G.S.; William, T.; Abd Rachman Isnadi, M.F.; Daim, S.; Barber, B.E.; Kho, S.; Sutherland, C.J.; Anstey, N.M.; et al. Diagnostic accuracy and limit of detection of ten malaria parasite lactate dehydrogenase-based rapid tests for Plasmodium knowlesi and P. falciparum. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 1023219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Mahittikorn, A.; Masangkay, F.R.; Kotepui, K.U.; Milanez, G.D.J.; Kotepui, M. Quantification of the misidentification of Plasmodium knowlesi as Plasmodium malariae by microscopy: An analysis of 1569 P. knowlesi cases. Malar. J. 2021, 20, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Yek, C.; Lay, S.; Bohl, J.A.; Man, S.; Chea, S.; Lon, C.; Ahyong, V.; Tato, C.M.; DeRisi, J.L.; Sovannaroth, S.; et al. Case Report: Cambodian National Malaria Surveillance Program Detection of Plasmodium knowlesi. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2022, 107, 151–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Piera, K.A.; Aziz, A.; William, T.; Bell, D.; González, I.J.; Barber, B.E.; Anstey, N.M.; Grigg, M.J. Detection of Plasmodium knowlesi, Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) in a co-endemic area in Malaysia. Malar. J. 2017, 16, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Chin, A.Z.; Maluda, M.C.M.; Jelip, J.; Jeffree, M.S.B.; Culleton, R.; Ahmed, K. Malaria elimination in Malaysia and the rising threat of Plasmodium knowlesi. J. Physiol. Anthr. 2020, 39, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ooi, C.H.; Phang, W.K.; Liew, J.W.K.; Atroosh, W.M.; Lau, Y.L. Profiling the imported human malaria in Sarawak, Malaysia in 2011-2019. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2023, 28, 486–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Genrich, G.L.; Guarner, J.; Paddock, C.D.; Shieh, W.J.; Greer, P.W.; Barnwell, J.W.; Zaki, S.R. Fatal malaria infection in travelers: Novel immunohistochemical assays for the detection of Plasmodium falciparum in tissues and implications for pathogenesis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2007, 76, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Mohammad, A.H.; Naserrudin, N.A.; Syed Abdul Rahim, S.S.; Jelip, J.; Atil, A.; Sazali, M.F.; Muyou, A.J.; Kunasagran, P.D.; Ahmad Kamarudin, N.; Azhar, Z.I.; et al. Narrative Review of the Control and Prevention of Knowlesi Malaria. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Global Malaria Programme: Diagnostic Testing: World Health Organization. Available online: https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/case-management/diagnosis (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  122. Amir, A.; Cheong, F.W.; de Silva, J.R.; Liew, J.W.K.; Lau, Y.L. Plasmodium knowlesi malaria: Current research perspectives. Infect. Drug Resist 2018, 11, 1145–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. How Malaria RDTs Work: World Health Organization. Available online: https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/case-management/diagnosis/rapid-diagnostic-tests/how-malaria-rdts-work (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  124. Tan, J.H.; Ding, H.X.; Fong, M.Y.; Lau, Y.L. Genetic diversity and in silico analysis of Plasmodium knowlesi Serine Repeat Antigen (SERA) 3 antigen 2 in Malaysia. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2023, 114, 105490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Fornace, K.M.; Herman, L.S.; Abidin, T.R.; Chua, T.H.; Daim, S.; Lorenzo, P.J.; Grignard, L.; Nuin, N.A.; Ying, L.T.; Grigg, M.J.; et al. Exposure and infection to Plasmodium knowlesi in case study communities in Northern Sabah, Malaysia and Palawan, The Philippines. PLoS Neglected. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0006432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Singh, B.; Kim Sung, L.; Matusop, A.; Radhakrishnan, A.; Shamsul, S.S.; Cox-Singh, J.; Thomas, A.; Conway, D.J. A large focus of naturally acquired Plasmodium knowlesi infections in human beings. Lancet 2004, 363, 1017–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Fong, Y.L.; Cadigan, F.C.; Coatney, G.R. A presumptive case of naturally occurring Plasmodium knowlesi malaria in man in Malaysia. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1971, 65, 839–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ruiz Cuenca, P.; Key, S.; Lindblade, K.A.; Vythilingam, I.; Drakeley, C.; Fornace, K. Is there evidence of sustained human-mosquito-human transmission of the zoonotic malaria Plasmodium knowlesi? A systematic literature review. Malar. J. 2022, 21, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Vaccines: Mosquirix: World Health Organization. Available online: https://extranet.who.int/pqweb/content/mosquirix (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  130. Laurens, M.B. RTS,S/AS01 vaccine (Mosquirix™): An overview. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2020, 16, 480–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Beeson, J.G.; Kurtovic, L.; Valim, C.; Asante, K.P.; Boyle, M.J.; Mathanga, D.; Dobano, C.; Moncunill, G. The RTS,S malaria vaccine: Current impact and foundation for the future. Sci. Transl. Med. 2022, 14, eabo6646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. RTS, S.C.T.P. Efficacy and safety of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine with or without a booster dose in infants and children in Africa: Final results of a phase 3, individually randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2015, 386, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Björkman, A.; Benn, C.S.; Aaby, P.; Schapira, A. RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine-proven safe and effective? Lancet Infect. Dis. 2023, 23, E318–E322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. WHO recommends groundbreaking malaria vaccine for children at risk: World Health Organization. 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/06-10-2021-who-recommends-groundbreaking-malaria-vaccine-for-children-at-risk (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  135. Agency, E.M. Mosquirix: Opinion on Medicine for Use Outside EU. 2022. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/opinion-medicine-use-outside-EU/human/mosquirix (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  136. Malaria Vaccine: WHO Position Paper—March 2022: World Health Organization. 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-wer9709-61%E2%80%9380 (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  137. Q&A on RTS,S Malaria Vaccine: World Health Organization. 2023. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/q-a-on-rts-s-malaria-vaccine (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  138. Venkatesan, P. The future of malaria control in light of RTS,S. Lancet Microbe. 2022, 3, e251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Tan, J.H.; Cheong, F.W.; Lau, Y.L.; Fong, M.Y. Plasmodium knowlesi circumsporozoite protein: Genetic characterisation and predicted antigenicity of the central repeat region. Trop. Biomed. 2023, 40, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Malaria in the United States: Treatment Tables: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/resources/pdf/Malaria_Treatment_Table_202306.pdf (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  141. Arnold, M.S.; Engel, J.A.; Chua, M.J.; Fisher, G.M.; Skinner-Adams, T.S.; Andrews, K.T. Adaptation of the [3H]Hypoxanthine Uptake Assay for In Vitro-Cultured Plasmodium knowlesi Malaria Parasites. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 2016, 60, 4361–4363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Pisciotta, J.M.; Scholl, P.F.; Shuman, J.L.; Shualev, V.; Sullivan, D.J. Quantitative characterization of hemozoin in Plasmodium berghei and vivax. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2017, 7, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Coban, C. The host targeting effect of chloroquine in malaria. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2020, 66, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Lin, J.-W.; Spaccapelo, R.; Schwarzer, E.; Sajid, M.; Annoura, T.; Deroost, K.; Ravelli, R.B.; Aime, E.; Capuccini, B.; Mommaas-Kienhuis, A.M.; et al. Replication of Plasmodium in reticulocytes can occur without hemozoin formation, resulting in chloroquine resistance. J. Exp. Med. 2015, 212, 893–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Thurai Rathnam, J.T.; Grigg, M.J.; Dini, S.; William, T.; Sakam, S.S.; Cooper, D.J.; Rajahram, G.S.; Barber, B.E.; Anstey, N.M.; Haghiri, A.; et al. Quantification of parasite clearance in Plasmodium knowlesi infections. Malar. J. 2023, 22, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. van Schalkwyk, D.A.; Blasco, B.; Davina Nuñez, R.; Liew, J.W.K.; Amir, A.; Lau, Y.L.; Leroy, D.; Moon, R.W.; Sutherland, C.J. Plasmodium knowlesi exhibits distinct in vitro drug susceptibility profiles from those of Plasmodium falciparum. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2019, 9, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Khanal, P. Antimalarial and anticancer properties of artesunate and other artemisinins: Current development. Monatsh. Chem. 2021, 152, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Intravenous Artesunate for Treatment of Severe Malaria in the United States: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2022. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/diagnosis_treatment/artesunate.html (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  149. Djimdé, A.; Lefèvre, G. Understanding the pharmacokinetics of Coartem. Malar. J. 2009, 8 (Suppl. S1), S4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Jajosky, R.P. Clarifying the terms parasitemia, parasite density, and parasite count. Transfus. Apher. Sci. 2023, 103788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Hequet, O.; Boisson, C.; Joly, P.; Revesz, D.; Kebaili, K.; Gauthier, A.; Renoux, C.; Creppy, S.; Nader, E.; Nicolas, J.F.; et al. Priming With Red Blood Cells Allows Red Blood Cell Exchange for Sickle Cell Disease in Low-Weight Children. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 743483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Williams, M.E.; Balogun, R.A. Principles of separation: Indications and therapeutic targets for plasma exchange. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2014, 9, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Basu, D.; Kulkarni, R. Overview of blood components and their preparation. Indian. J. Anaesth. 2014, 58, 529–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Northwestern. Headline for Red Blood Cell Exchange. Available online: https://www.nm.org/conditions-and-care-areas/treatments/red-blood-cell-exchange#:~:text=The%20length%20of%20the%20procedure,about%201%20to%202%20hours. (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  155. van Genderen, P.J.; Hesselink, D.A.; Bezemer, J.M.; Wismans, P.J.; Overbosch, D. Efficacy and safety of exchange transfusion as an adjunct therapy for severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria in nonimmune travelers: A 10-year single-center experience with a standardized treatment protocol. Transfusion 2010, 50, 787–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Lin, J.; Huang, X.; Qin, G.; Zhang, S.; Sun, W.; Wang, Y.; Ren, K.; Xu, J.; Han, X. Manual exchange transfusion for severe imported falciparum malaria: A retrospective study. Malar. J. 2018, 17, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Genstler, J.T.; Abdipour, A. Red blood cell exchange in treatment of severe cerebral P. falciparum malaria: A case report. J. Clin. Apher. 2019, 34, 61–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Dongare, H.C.; Khatib, K.I. Exchange Transfusion in Severe Falciparum Malaria. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2016, 10, OD05–OD06. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Boctor, F.N. Red Blood Cell Exchange Transfusion as an Adjunct Treatment for Severe Pediatric Falciparum Malaria, Using Automated or Manual Procedures. Pediatrics 2005, 116, e592–e595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Weir, E.G.; King, K.E.; Ness, P.M.; Eshleman, S.H. Automated RBC exchange transfusion:treatment for cerebral malaria. Transfusion 2000, 40, 702–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Auer-Hackenberg, L.; Staudinger, T.; Bojic, A.; Locker, G.; Leitner, G.C.; Graninger, W.; Winkler, S.; Ramharter, M.; Worel, N. Automated red blood cell exchange as an adjunctive treatment for severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria at the Vienna General Hospital in Austria: A retrospective cohort study. Malar. J. 2012, 11, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Zhang, Y.; Telleria, L.; Vinetz, J.M.; Yawn, D.; Rossmann, S.; Indrikovs, A.J. Erythrocytapheresis for Plasmodium falciparum infection complicated by cerebral malaria and hyperparasitemia. J. Clin. Apher. 2001, 16, 15–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Harris, P.; Price, S.; Senthuran, S.; Cochupanachimootil, J.; Norton, R. Automated erythrocytapheresis for severe falciparum malaria. Intern. Med. J. 2011, 41, 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Macallan, D.C.; Pocock, M.; Bishop, E.; Bevan, D.H.; Parker-Williams, J.; Harrison, T.; Robinson, G.T. Automated erythrocytapheresis in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria. J. Infect. 1999, 39, 233–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Shelat, S.G.; Lott, J.P.; Braga, M.S. Considerations on the use of adjunct red blood cell exchange transfusion in the treatment of severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Transfusion 2010, 50, 875–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Barman, H. Exchange transfusion in complicated pediatric malaria: A critical appraisal. Indian. J. Crit. Care Med. 2015, 19, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Starkl Renar, K.; Iskra, J.; Križaj, I. Understanding malarial toxins. Toxicon 2016, 119, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Connelly-Smith, L.; Alquist, C.R.; Aqui, N.A.; Hofmann, J.C.; Klingel, R.; Onwuemene, O.A.; Patriquin, C.J.; Pham, H.P.; Sanchez, A.P.; Schneiderman, J.; et al. Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice—Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Ninth Special Issue. J. Clin. Apher. 2023, 38, 77–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Pathirana, S.L.; Alles, H.K.; Bandara, S.; Phone-Kyaw, M.; Perera, M.K.; Wickremasinghe, A.R.; Mendis, K.N.; Handunnetti, S.M. ABO-blood-group types and protection against severe, Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 2005, 99, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Rowe, J.A.; Handel, I.G.; Thera, M.A.; Deans, A.M.; Lyke, K.E.; Koné, A.; Diallo, D.A.; Raza, A.; Kai, O.; Marsh, K.; et al. Blood group O protects against severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria through the mechanism of reduced rosetting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 17471–17476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Archer, N.M.; Petersen, N.; Clark, M.A.; Buckee, C.O.; Childs, L.M.; Duraisingh, M.T. Resistance to Plasmodium falciparum in sickle cell trait erythrocytes is driven by oxygen-dependent growth inhibition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 7350–7355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Carlson, J.; Nash, G.B.; Gabutti, V.; al-Yaman, F.; Wahlgren, M. Natural protection against severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria due to impaired rosette formation. Blood 1994, 84, 3909–3914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Cserti, C.M.; Dzik, W.H. The ABO blood group system and Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Blood 2007, 110, 2250–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Ebel, E.R.; Uricchio, L.H.; Petrov, D.A.; Egan, E.S. Revisiting the malaria hypothesis: Accounting for polygenicity and pleiotropy. Trends. Parasitol. 2022, 38, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Piel, F.B.; Patil, A.P.; Howes, R.E.; Nyangiri, O.A.; Gething, P.W.; Williams, T.N.; Weatherall, D.J.; Hay, S.I. Global distribution of the sickle cell gene and geographical confirmation of the malaria hypothesis. Nat. Commun. 2010, 1, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Akide-Ndunge, O.B.; Ayi, K.; Arese, P. The Haldane malaria hypothesis: Facts, artifacts, and a prophecy. Redox. Rep. 2003, 8, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Mohandas, N.; An, X. Malaria and human red blood cells. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2012, 201, 593–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Gowda, L.; Vege, S.; Kessler, D.; Shaz, B.; Westhoff, C.M. Screening of blood donors for sickle cell trait using a DNA-based approach: Frequency in a multiethnic donor population. Transfusion 2021, 61, 2008–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Powell, V.I.; Grima, K. Exchange transfusion for malaria and babesia infection. Transfus. Med. Rev. 2002, 16, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Kim, H.C. Red cell exchange: Special focus on sickle cell disease. Hematology 2014, 2014, 450–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Carson, J.L.; Triulzi, D.J.; Ness, P.M. Indications for and Adverse Effects of Red-Cell Transfusion. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 1261–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Maier, C.L.; Gross, P.J.; Dean, C.L.; Chonat, S.; Ip, A.; McLemore, M.; El Rassi, F.; Stowell, S.R.; Josephson, C.D.; Fasano, R.M. Transfusion-transmitted malaria masquerading as sickle cell crisis with multisystem organ failure. Transfusion 2018, 58, 1550–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Tejura, B.; Sass, D.A.; Fischer, R.A.; Daskal, I.; Eiger, G. Transfusion-associated falciparum malaria successfully treated with red blood cell exchange transfusion. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2000, 320, 337–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Watanaboonyongcharoen, P.; Park, Y.A.; Poisson, J.L.; Brecher, M.E. Rapid increases in parasitemia following red cell exchange for malaria. J. Clin. Apher. 2011, 26, 315–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Jajosky, R.P.; Patel, K.R.; Allen, J.W.; Zerra, P.E.; Chonat, S.; Ayona, D.; Maier, C.L.; Morais, D.; Wu, S.C.; Luckey, C.J.; et al. Antibody-mediated antigen loss switches augmented immunity to antiobdy-mediated immunosuppresion. Blood 2023, 142, 1082–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Jajosky, R.P.; Patel, S.R.; Wu, S.C.; Patel, K.R.; Covington, M.L.; Vallecillo-Zuniga, M.L.; Ayona, D.; Bennett, A.; Luckey, C.J.; Hudson, K.E.; et al. Prior Immunization to an Intracellular Antigen Enhances Subsequent Red Blood Cell Alloimmunization in Mice. Blood 2023, 141, 2642–2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Arthur, C.M.; Stowell, S.R. The Development and Consequences of Red Blood Cell Alloimmunization. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2023, 18, 537–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Arthur, C.M.; Allen, J.W.L.; Verkerke, H.; Yoo, J.; Jajosky, R.P.; Girard-Pierce, K.; Chonat, S.; Zerra, P.; Maier, C.; Rha, J.; et al. Antigen density dictates RBC clearance, but not antigen modulation, following incompatible RBC transfusion in mice. Blood Adv. 2021, 5, 527–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Mener, A.; Patel, S.R.; Arthur, C.M.; Chonat, S.; Wieland, A.; Santhanakrishnan, M.; Liu, J.; Maier, C.L.; Jajosky, R.P.; Girard-Pierce, K.; et al. Complement serves as a switch between CD4+ T cell-independent and -dependent RBC antibody responses. JCI Insight 2018, 3, e121631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Arthur, C.M.; Patel, S.R.; Smith, N.H.; Bennett, A.; Kamili, N.A.; Mener, A.; Gerner-Smidt, C.; Sullivan, H.C.; Hale, J.S.; Wieland, A.; et al. Antigen Density Dictates Immune Responsiveness following Red Blood Cell Transfusion. J. Immunol. 2017, 198, 2671–2680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Maier, C.L.; Jajosky, R.; Verkerke, H.; Patel, S.R.; Allen, J.W.; Fuller, M.; Stowell, S.R. Storage Differentially Impacts Immunization to Red Cell Antigens. Transfusion, 2022; in press. [Google Scholar]
  192. Zerra, P.E.; Patel, S.R.; Jajosky, R.P.; Arthur, C.M.; McCoy, J.W.; Allen, J.W.L.; Chonat, S.; Fasano, R.M.; Roback, J.D.; Josephson, C.D.; et al. Marginal zone B cells mediate a CD4 T-cell-dependent extrafollicular antibody response following RBC transfusion in mice. Blood 2021, 138, 706–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Arthur, C.M.; Patel, S.R.; Sharma, A.; Zerra, P.E.; Chonat, S.; Jajosky, R.P.; Fasano, R.M.; Patel, R.; Bennett, A.; Zhou, X.; et al. Clodronate inhibits alloimmunization against distinct red blood cell alloantigens in mice. Transfusion 2022, 62, 948–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Patel, S.R.; Bennett, A.; Girard-Pierce, K.; Maier, C.L.; Chonat, S.; Arthur, C.M.; Zerra, P.E.; Mener, A.; Stowell, S.R. Recipient priming to one RBC alloantigen directly enhances subsequent alloimmunization in mice. Blood Adv. 2018, 2, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Patel, S.R.; Gibb, D.R.; Girard-Pierce, K.; Zhou, X.; Rodrigues, L.C.; Arthur, C.M.; Bennett, A.L.; Jajosky, R.P.; Fuller, M.; Maier, C.L.; et al. Marginal Zone B Cells Induce Alloantibody Formation Following RBC Transfusion. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Thein, S.L.; Pirenne, F.; Fasano, R.M.; Habibi, A.; Bartolucci, P.; Chonat, S.; Hendrickson, J.E.; Stowell, S.R. Hemolytic transfusion reactions in sickle cell disease: Underappreciated and potentially fatal. Haematologica 2020, 105, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Chonat, S.; Graciaa, S.; Shin, H.S.; Newton, J.G.; Quarmyne, M.O.; Boudreaux, J.; Tang, A.; Zerra, P.E.; Rollins, M.R.; Josephson, C.D.; et al. Eculizumab for complement mediated thrombotic microangiopathy in sickle cell disease. Haematologica 2020, 105, 2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Pirenne, F.; Yazdanbakhsh, K. How I safely transfuse patients with sickle-cell disease and manage delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions. Blood 2018, 131, 2773–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Floch, A.; Morel, A.; Zanchetta-Balint, F.; Cordonnier-Jourdin, C.; Allali, S.; Grall, M.; Ithier, G.; Carpentier, B.; Pakdaman, S.; Merle, J.C.; et al. Anti-C5 antibody treatment for delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions in sickle cell disease. Haematologica 2020, 105, 2694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Dean, C.L.; Maier, C.L.; Roback, J.D.; Stowell, S.R. Multiple hemolytic transfusion reactions misinterpreted as severe vaso-occlusive crisis in a patient with sickle cell disease. Transfusion 2019, 59, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Nickel, R.S.; Hendrickson, J.E.; Fasano, R.M.; Meyer, E.K.; Winkler, A.M.; Yee, M.M.; Lane, P.A.; Jones, Y.A.; Pashankar, F.D.; New, T.; et al. Impact of red blood cell alloimmunization on sickle cell disease mortality: A case series. Transfusion 2016, 56, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Chou, S.T.; Alsawas, M.; Fasano, R.M.; Field, J.J.; Hendrickson, J.E.; Howard, J.; Kameka, M.; Kwiatkowski, J.L.; Pirenne, F.; Shi, P.A.; et al. American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for sickle cell disease: Transfusion support. Blood Adv. 2020, 4, 327–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Cooling, L. Blood Groups in Infection and Host Susceptibility. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 28, 801–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Wu, S.C.; Arthur, C.M.; Jan, H.M.; Garcia-Beltran, W.F.; Patel, K.R.; Rathgeber, M.; Verkerke, H.; Cheedarla, N.; Jajosky, R.P.; Paul, A.; et al. Blood Group A Enhances SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Blood 2023, 142, 742–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Severe Covid, G.G.; Ellinghaus, D.; Degenhardt, F.; Bujanda, L.; Buti, M.; Albillos, A.; Invernizzi, P.; Fernandez, J.; Prati, D.; Baselli, G.; et al. Genomewide Association Study of Severe COVID-19 with Respiratory Failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 1522–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Jajosky, R.P.; Jajosky, A.N.; Jajosky, P.G. Can Therapeutically-Rational Exchange (T-REX) of Thalassemic Red Blood Cells Improve the Clinical Course of Plasmodium falciparum Malaria? Eurasian J. Med. 2018, 50, 215–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Jajosky, R.P.; Jajosky, A.N.; Jajosky, P.G. To prevent or ameliorate severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria, why not evaluate the impact of exchange transfusions of sickle cell trait red blood cells? Transfus. Apher. Sci. 2018, 57, 63–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Jajosky, R.P.; Jajosky, A.N.; Jajosky, P.G. Can the Therapeutically-rational Exchange (T-REX) of Glucose-6-phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficient Red Blood Cells Reduce Plasmodium falciparum Malaria Morbidity and Mortality? J. Nepal. Health Res. Counc. 2018, 16, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Jajosky, R.P.; Jajosky, R.P.; Jajosky, P.G.; Jajosky, A.N.; Jajosky, P.G. Can therapeutically-rational exchange (T-REX) of type-O red blood cells (RBCs) benefit Plasmodium falciparum malaria patients? Transfus. Apher. Sci. 2019, 58, 344–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Jajosky, R.P.; Jajosky, A.N.; Jajosky, P.G. Can exchange transfusions using red blood cells from donors with Southeast Asian ovalocytosis prevent or ameliorate cerebral malaria in patients with multi-drug resistant Plasmodium falciparum? Transfus. Apher. Sci. 2017, 56, 865–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Jajosky, R.P.; Jajosky, A.N.; Jajosky, P.G. Can Exchange Transfusions Using Red Blood Cells from Donors with Hemoglobin E Trait Prevent or Ameliorate Severe Malaria in Patients with Multi-drug Resistant Plasmodium falciparum? Indian. J. Hematol. Blood Transfus. 2018, 34, 591–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Jajosky, R.P.; Jajosky, A.N.; Jajosky, P.G. “Dual-gene” malaria-resistance: Therapeutically-rational exchange (T-REX) of group-O sickle trait and group-O C-traittrait red blood cells can be evaluated in Benin and Nigeria. Transfus. Apher. Sci. 2020, 59, 102733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Jajosky, R.P.; Jajosky, A.N.; Jajosky, P.G. Therapeutically-rational exchange (T-REX) of Gerbich-negative red blood cells can be evaluated in Papua New Guinea as “a rescue adjunct” for patients with Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Ther. Apher. Dial. 2021, 25, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Jajosky, R.P.; Jajosky, A.N.; Jajosky, P.G. Optimizing exchange transfusion for patients with severe Babesia divergens babesiosis: Therapeutically-Rational Exchange (T-REX) of M antigen-negative and/or S antigen-negative red blood cells should be evaluated now. Transfus. Clin. Biol. 2019, 26, 76–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Thu, A.M.; Phyo, A.P.; Landier, J.; Parker, D.M.; Nosten, F.H. Combating multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. FEBS J. 2017, 284, 2569–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Meny, G.M. The Duffy blood group system: A review. Immunohematology 2010, 26, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Höher, G.; Fiegenbaum, M.; Almeida, S. Molecular basis of the Duffy blood group system. Blood Transfus. 2018, 16, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. De Silva, J.R.; Lau, Y.L.; Fong, M.Y. Genotyping of the Duffy Blood Group among Plasmodium knowlesi-Infected Patients in Malaysia. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e108951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Ntumngia, F.B.; Thomson-Luque, R.; Pires, C.V.; Adams, J.H. The role of the human Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines in malaria susceptibility: Current opinions and future treatment prospects. J. Recept. Ligand. Channel. Res. 2016, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Grüring, C.; Moon, R.W.; Lim, C.; Holder, A.A.; Blackman, M.J.; Duraisingh, M.T. Human red blood cell-adapted Plasmodium knowlesi parasites: A new model system for malaria research. Cell. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 612–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Chan, L.-J.; Dietrich, M.H.; Nguitragool, W.; Tham, W.-H. Plasmodium vivax Reticulocyte Binding Proteins for invasion into reticulocytes. Cell. Microbiol. 2020, 22, e13110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Lewis, G.E., Jr.; Miller, L.H.; Ibrahim, L.; Wong, P.W.; McGinniss, M.; Ooi, W.L. Duffy phenotypes in Malaysian populations: Correction of previous unusual findings. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1988, 82, 509–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. de Silva, J.R.; Amir, A.; Lau, Y.L.; Ooi, C.-H.; Fong, M.Y. Distribution of the Duffy genotypes in Malaysian Borneo and its relation to Plasmodium knowlesi malaria susceptibility. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0222681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Shimizu, Y.; Ao, H.; Soemantri, A.; Tiwawech, D.; Settheetham-Ishida, W.; Kayame, O.W.; Kimura, M.; Nishioka, T.; Ishida, T. Sero- and molecular typing of Duffy blood group in Southeast Asians and Oceanians. Hum. Biol. 2000, 72, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  225. Howes, R.E.; Patil, A.P.; Piel, F.B.; Nyangiri, O.A.; Kabaria, C.W.; Gething, P.W.; Zimmerman, P.A.; Barnadas, C.; Beall, C.M.; Gebremedhin, A.; et al. The global distribution of the Duffy blood group. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. CDC. Simian malaria in a U.S. traveler—New York, 2008. MMWR 2009, 58, 229–232. [Google Scholar]
  227. Alemayehu, A. Zoonotic malaria in sub-Saharan Africa: A Mini-Review. J. Clin. Med. Rev. 2022, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Onyedibe, K.I.; Iroezindu, M.O.; Obishakin, E.T.; Ojogba, M.O.; Shobowale, E.O.; Ita, I.O.; Udoh, U.A.; Isa, S.E.; Egah, D.Z. Plasmodium knowlesi Infection: Should Africa be Prepared for a New Human Malaria Threat? Int. J. Trop. Dis. Health 2016, 19, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Halawani, A.J.; Saboor, M.; Abu-Tawil, H.I.; Mahzari, A.A.; Mansor, A.S.; Bantun, F. Prevalence of Duffy Blood Group Antigens and Phenotypes among Saudi Blood Donors in Southwestern Saudi Arabia. Clin. Lab. 2021, 67, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Owaidah, A.Y.; Naffaa, N.M.; Alumran, A.; Alzahrani, F. Phenotype Frequencies of Major Blood Group Systems (Rh, Kell, Kidd, Duffy, MNS, P, Lewis, and Lutheran) Among Blood Donors in the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia. J. Blood Med. 2020, 11, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Kahar, M.A.; Patel, R.D. Phenotype frequencies of blood group systems (Rh, Kell, Kidd, Duffy, MNS, P, Lewis, and Lutheran) in blood donors of south Gujarat, India. Asian J. Transfus. Sci. 2014, 8, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Quintero-Santacruz, M.; Flórez Elvira, L.; Mejía Hurtado, A.F.; Macia Mejía, C. Estimated prevalence of the Duffy null phenotype Fy (a-b-) among black blood-donors in Southwestern Colombia. Transfus. Apher. Sci. 2020, 59, 102884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Chaturvedi, R.; Deora, N.; Bhandari, D.; Parvez, S.; Sinha, A.; Sharma, A. Trends of neglected Plasmodium species infection in humans over the past century in India. One Health 2020, 11, 100190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Kaur, C.; Pramanik, A.; Kumari, K.; Mandage, R.; Dinda, A.K.; Sankar, J.; Bagga, A.; Agarwal, S.K.; Sinha, A.; Singh, G.; et al. Renal detection of Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium knowlesi in malaria associated acute kidney injury: A retrospective case–control study. BMC Res. Notes 2020, 13, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Tyagi, R.K.; Das, M.K.; Singh, S.S.; Sharma, Y.D. Discordance in drug resistance-associated mutation patterns in marker genes of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium knowlesi during coinfections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2013, 68, 1081–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Das, M.K.; Singh, S.S.; Adak, T.; Vasantha, K.; Mohanty, D. The Duffy blood groups of Jarawas—The primitive and vanishing tribe of Andaman and Nicobar Islands of India. Transfus. Med. 2005, 15, 237–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Vidhya, P.T.; Sunish, I.P.; Maile, A.; Zahid, A.K. Anopheles sundaicus Mosquitoes as Vector for Plasmodium knowlesi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 25, 817–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Awab, G.R.; Aaram, F.; Jamornthanyawat, N.; Suwannasin, K.; Pagornrat, W.; Watson, J.A.; Woodrow, C.J.; Dondorp, A.M.; Day, N.P.J.; Imwong, M.; et al. Protective effect of Mediterranean-type glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency against Plasmodium vivax malaria. eLife 2021, 10, e62448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Guindo, A.; Fairhurst, R.M.; Doumbo, O.K.; Wellems, T.E.; Diallo, D.A. X-linked G6PD deficiency protects hemizygous males but not heterozygous females against severe malaria. PLoS Med. 2007, 4, e66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Cappadoro, M.; Giribaldi, G.; O’Brien, E.; Turrini, F.; Mannu, F.; Ulliers, D.; Simula, G.; Luzzatto, L.; Arese, P. Early phagocytosis of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD)-deficient erythrocytes parasitized by Plasmodium falciparum may explain malaria protection in G6PD deficiency. Blood 1998, 92, 2527–2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  241. Ruwende, C.; Khoo, S.C.; Snow, R.W.; Yates, S.N.; Kwiatkowski, D.; Gupta, S.; Warn, P.; Allsopp, C.E.; Gilbert, S.C.; Peschu, N.; et al. Natural selection of hemi- and heterozygotes for G6PD deficiency in Africa by resistance to severe malaria. Nature 1995, 376, 246–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Barber, B.E.; Grigg, M.J.; William, T.; Yeo, T.W.; Anstey, N.M. The Treatment of Plasmodium knowlesi Malaria. Trends. Parasitol. 2017, 33, 242–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. World Health Organization. Testing for G6PD Deficiency for Safe Use of Primaquine in Radical Cure of P. vivax and P. ovale: Policy Brief Geneva: World Health Organization. 2016. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/250297 (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  244. World Health Organization. Technical Consultation to Review the Classification of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6PD). 2022. Available online: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/malaria/mpac-documentation/mpag-mar2022-session2-technical-consultation-g6pd-classification.pdf?sfvrsn=1f36be5e_12&download=true (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  245. Omisakin, C.T.; Esan, A.J.; Ogunleye, A.A.; Ojo-Bola, O.; Owoseni, M.F.; Omoniyi, D.P. Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6pd) Deficiency and Sickle Cell Trait among Blood Donors in Nigeria. Am. J. Public Health Res. 2014, 2, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Emamghorashi, F.; Hoshmand, F.; Mohtashamifar, A. Screening for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in blood donors. Hematology 2010, 15, 122–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Kittisares, K.; Palasuwan, D.; Noulsri, E.; Palasuwan, A. Thalassemia trait and G6PD deficiency in Thai blood donors. Transfus. Apher. Sci. 2019, 58, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Rojphoung, P.; Rungroung, T.; Siriboonrit, U.; Vejbaesya, S.; Permpikul, P.; Kittivorapart, J. Prevalence of G6PD deficiency in Thai blood donors, the characteristics of G6PD deficient blood, and the efficacy of fluorescent spot test to screen for G6PD deficiency in a hospital blood bank setting. Hematology 2022, 27, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  249. Amini, F.; Ismail, E.; Zilfalil, B.A. Prevalence and molecular study of G6PD deficiency in Malaysian Orang Asli. Intern. Med. J. 2011, 41, 351–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Li, Q.; Yang, F.; Liu, R.; Luo, L.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Liu, H.; Zhang, W.; Fan, Z.; Yang, Z.; et al. Prevalence and Molecular Characterization of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency at the China-Myanmar Border. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0134593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Hutagalung, J.; Kusnanto, H.; Supargiyono; Sadewa, A.H.; Satyagraha, A.W. The first evaluation of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PD) gene mutation in malaria-endemic region at South Central Timor (SCT) district, Eastern Indonesia 2015-2016. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 125, 012016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Jalloh, A.; Tantular, I.S.; Pusarawati, S.; Kawilarang, A.P.; Kerong, H.; Lin, K.; Ferreira, M.U.; Matsuoka, H.; Arai, M.; Kita, K.; et al. Rapid epidemiologic assessment of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in malaria-endemic areas in Southeast Asia using a novel diagnostic kit. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2004, 9, 615–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  253. Anderle, A.; Bancone, G.; Domingo, G.J.; Gerth-Guyette, E.; Pal, S.; Satyagraha, A.W. Point-of-Care Testing for G6PD Deficiency: Opportunities for Screening. Int. J. Neonatal Screen 2018, 4, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Palacajornsuk, P.; Sriwangpon, P. Prevalence of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G-6-PD) using methemoglobin reduction test in blood donors of Chiang Mai Province. J. Assoc. Med. Sci. 2015, 48, 29. [Google Scholar]
  255. Mansor, H.; Mohd Tohit, E.R.; Idris, F.; Awang Abd Rahman, A. Prevalence, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of G6PD deficient blood donors in Terengganu and the effects of storage on their donated blood. Malays. J. Med. Health Sci. 2020, 16, 126–134. [Google Scholar]
  256. Francis, R.O.; Jhang, J.; Hendrickson, J.E.; Zimring, J.C.; Hod, E.A.; Spitalnik, S.L. Frequency of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-deficient red blood cell units in a metropolitan transfusion service. Transfusion 2013, 53, 606–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. A Guide to Fluorescent Spot Testing for G6PD Deficiency. 2014. Available online: https://media.path.org/documents/FST_Guidebook.pdf (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  258. World Health Organization. Blood Donor Selection: Guidelines on Assessing Donor Suitability for Blood Donation; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  259. Francis, R.O.; Belpulsi, D.; Soffing, M.; Yeh, R.; Coronel, E.E.; Sheikh, A.; Spitalnik, S.; Hod, E.A. Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency in Blood Donors Is Associated with Decreased Post-Transfusion Red Cell Recovery. Blood 2017, 130 (Suppl. S1), 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Hess, J.R. Scientific problems in the regulation of red blood cell products. Transfusion 2012, 52, 1827–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Krajibthong, S.; Sahntipurna, V.; Parnsamut, C.; Pitakpolrat, P.; Pattanapongsak, W.; Watanaboonyongcharoen, P.; Rojnuckarin, P. Randomised controlled trial of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficient versus non-deficient red blood cell transfusion in patients with hypoproliferative anaemia. Transfus. Med. 2022, 32, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Karafin, M.S.; Francis, R.O. Impact of G6PD status on red cell storage and transfusion outcomes. Blood Transfus. 2019, 17, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Olowe, S.A.; Ransome-Kuti, O. Exchange transfusion using G-6-PG deficient or Hgb-AS blood in icteric neonates. J. Natl. Med. Assoc. 1981, 73, 811–819. [Google Scholar]
  264. Flatt, J.F.; Stevens-Hernandez, C.J.; Cogan, N.M.; Eggleston, D.J.; Haines, N.M.; Heesom, K.J.; Picard, V.; Thomas, C.; Bruce, L.J. Expression of South East Asian Ovalocytic Band 3 Disrupts Erythroblast Cytokinesis and Reticulocyte Maturation. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Picard, V.; Proust, A.; Eveillard, M.; Flatt, J.F.; Couec, M.-L.; Caillaux, G.; Fénéant-Thibault, M.; Finkelstein, A.; Raphaël, M.; Delaunay, J.; et al. Homozygous Southeast Asian ovalocytosis is a severe dyserythropoietic anemia associated with distal renal tubular acidosis. Blood 2014, 123, 1963–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  266. Hsu, K. Exploring the Potential Roles of Band 3 and Aquaporin-1 in Blood CO2 Transport–Inspired by Comparative Studies of Glycophorin B-A-B Hybrid Protein GP.Mur. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Lavinya, A.A.; Razali, R.A.; Razak, M.A.; Mohamed, R.; Moses, E.J.; Soundararajan, M.; Bruce, L.J.; Eswaran, J.; Yusoff, N.M. Homozygous Southeast Asian ovalocytosis in five live-born neonates. Haematologica 2020, 106, 1758–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  268. Moreno-Castaño, A.B.; Diaz-Ricart, M.; Escolar, G.; García, E.; Mañú-Pereira, M.D.M.; Idrizovic, A.; Matute, M.; Molina, A.; Faneca, J.; Merino, A. Southeast Asian ovalocytosis detected in a critical patient with COVID-19 pneumonia. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2022, 44, e215–e218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  269. Wrong, O.; Bruce, L.J.; Unwin, R.J.; Toye, A.M.; Tanner, M.J.A. Band 3 mutations, distal renal tubular acidosis, and Southeast Asian ovalocytosis. Kidney Int. 2002, 62, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  270. Bolton-Maggs PH, B.; Stevens, R.F.; Dodd, N.J.; Lamont, G.; Tittensor, P.; King, M.J.; General Haematology Task Force of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of hereditary spherocytosis. Br. J. Haematol. 2004, 126, 455–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Hadley, T.; Saul, A.; Lamont, G.; Hudson, D.E.; Miller, L.H.; Kidson, C. Resistance of Melanesian elliptocytes (ovalocytes) to invasion by Plasmodium knowlesi and Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites in vitro. J. Clin. Investig. 1983, 71, 780–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Dondorp, A.M.; Fanello, C.I.; Hendriksen, I.C.; Gomes, E.; Seni, A.; Chhaganlal, K.D.; Bojang, K.; Olaosebikan, R.; Anunobi, N.; Maitland, K.; et al. Artesunate versus quinine in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria in African children (AQUAMAT): An open-label, randomised trial. Lancet 2010, 376, 1647–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Dondorp, A.; Nosten, F.; Stepniewska, K.; Day, N.; White, N. Artesunate versus quinine for treatment of severe falciparum malaria: A randomised trial. Lancet 2005, 366, 717–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Khoury, D.S.; Zaloumis, S.G.; Grigg, M.J.; Haque, A.; Davenport, M.P. Malaria Parasite Clearance: What Are We Really Measuring? Trends. Parasitol. 2020, 36, 413–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  275. Hughes, K.R.; Biagini, G.A.; Craig, A.G. Continued cytoadherence of Plasmodium falciparum infected red blood cells after antimalarial treatment. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2010, 169, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  276. Phyo, A.P.; Nkhoma, S.; Stepniewska, K.; Ashley, E.A.; Nair, S.; McGready, R.; ler Moo, C.; Al-Saai, S.; Dondorp, A.M.; Lwin, K.M.; et al. Emergence of artemisinin-resistant malaria on the western border of Thailand: A longitudinal study. Lancet 2012, 379, 1960–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Byakika-Kibwika, P.; Nyakato, P.; Lamorde, M.; Kiragga, A.N. Assessment of parasite clearance following treatment of severe malaria with intravenous artesunate in Ugandan children enrolled in a randomized controlled clinical trial. Malar. J. 2018, 17, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Immacolata, A.; Roberta, R.; Antonella, G.; Achille, I. New insights on hereditary erythrocyte membrane defects. Haematologica 2016, 101, 1284–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Gallagher, P.G. Red Cell Membrane Disorders. Hematology 2005, 2005, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Instructions to Authors and Reviewers Concerning Description of Apheresis Procedures. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/pb-assets/assets/10981101/Apheresis_Procedures_Reporting_Guide-1509463686000.pdf (accessed on 14 September 2023).
  281. Jajosky, R.P.; Jajosky, A.N.; Jajosky, P.G. ABO blood group should be considered and reported when red blood cell exchange transfusion is used to treat Plasmodiumfalciparum Malaria patients. Transfus. Clin. Biol. 2020, 27, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 3. Pk and Pm can have a similar morphologic appearance. The images were courtesy of DPDx from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [70].
Figure 3. Pk and Pm can have a similar morphologic appearance. The images were courtesy of DPDx from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [70].
Tropicalmed 08 00478 g003
Table 1. RBC variants which are likely to provide resistance against Pk malaria.
Table 1. RBC variants which are likely to provide resistance against Pk malaria.
RBCsEvidence for Resistance against Pk
Fy(a-b-)
  • Duffy is an essential receptor for Pk invasion.
  • No Pk malaria patient has the Fy(a-b-) phenotype.
  • Invasion assays show a decline in Pk invasion of Fy(a-b-) RBCs.
  • Offers a survival advantage against Pv malaria.
G6PDd
  • G6PDd individuals are less likely to present to the hospital with Pk
    malaria because they are more likely be symptomatic.
  • Likely provides a survival advantage against malaria.
SAO
  • An invasion assay showed a marked reduction in Pk parasite invasion.
  • Probably offers a survival advantage against Pf malaria.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jajosky, R.P.; Wu, S.-C.; Jajosky, P.G.; Stowell, S.R. Plasmodium knowlesi (Pk) Malaria: A Review & Proposal of Therapeutically Rational Exchange (T-REX) of Pk-Resistant Red Blood Cells. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8, 478. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8100478

AMA Style

Jajosky RP, Wu S-C, Jajosky PG, Stowell SR. Plasmodium knowlesi (Pk) Malaria: A Review & Proposal of Therapeutically Rational Exchange (T-REX) of Pk-Resistant Red Blood Cells. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2023; 8(10):478. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8100478

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jajosky, Ryan Philip, Shang-Chuen Wu, Philip G. Jajosky, and Sean R. Stowell. 2023. "Plasmodium knowlesi (Pk) Malaria: A Review & Proposal of Therapeutically Rational Exchange (T-REX) of Pk-Resistant Red Blood Cells" Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 8, no. 10: 478. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8100478

APA Style

Jajosky, R. P., Wu, S. -C., Jajosky, P. G., & Stowell, S. R. (2023). Plasmodium knowlesi (Pk) Malaria: A Review & Proposal of Therapeutically Rational Exchange (T-REX) of Pk-Resistant Red Blood Cells. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, 8(10), 478. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8100478

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop