Next Article in Journal
Needs Assessment of Southeastern United States Vector Control Agencies: Capacity Improvement Is Greatly Needed to Prevent the Next Vector-Borne Disease Outbreak
Previous Article in Journal
Serum Levels of Ficolin-3 and Mannose-Binding Lectin in Patients with Leprosy and Their Family Contacts in a Hyperendemic Region in Northeastern Brazil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Infection Rates of Schistosome Transmitting Snails in Southern Africa

by
Onyekachi Esther Nwoko
1,*,
Chester Kalinda
1,2,3 and
Moses John Chimbari
1,4
1
Discipline of Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Howard Campus, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4000, South Africa
2
Bill and Joyce Cummings Institute of Global Health, University of Global Health Equity (UGHE), P.O. Box 6955, Kigali 20093, Rwanda
3
Institute of Global Health Equity Research (IGHER), University of Global Health Equity (UGHE), P.O. Box 6955, Kigali 20093, Rwanda
4
Department of Behavioural Science, Medical and Health Sciences, Great Zimbabwe University, Masvingo P.O. Box 1235, Zimbabwe
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7(5), 72; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7050072
Submission received: 10 March 2022 / Revised: 21 April 2022 / Accepted: 21 April 2022 / Published: 13 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Neglected and Emerging Tropical Diseases)

Abstract

:
Efforts to interrupt and eliminate schistosomiasis as a public health problem have increased in several Southern African countries. A systematic review was carried out on the infection rates of snails that cause schistosomiasis in humans. The searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, using the PRISMA guidelines from inception to 24 February 2022. The study quality was assessed by using the Joanna Briggs Institute prevalence critical appraisal checklist. Pooled infection rates were estimated by using an inverse variance heterogeneity model, while heterogeneity was determined by using Cochran’s Q test and Higgins i2 statistics. A total of 572 articles were screened, but only 28 studies were eligible for inclusion based on predetermined criteria. In the selected studies, 82,471 Bulinus spp. and 16,784 Biomphalaria spp. snails were screened for cercariae. The pooled infectivity of schistosome intermediate host snails, Biomphalaria spp., and Bulinus spp. were 1%, 2%, and 1%, respectively. Snail infection rates were higher in the 1900s compared to the 2000s. A Luis Furuya–Kanamori index of 3.16 indicated publication bias, and a high level of heterogeneity was observed. Although snail infectivity in Southern Africa is relatively low, it falls within the interval of common snail infection rates, thus indicating the need for suitable snail control programs that could interrupt transmission and achieve elimination.

1. Introduction

Schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease (NTD) that mainly affects poor and marginalized communities in sub-Saharan Africa [1,2]. The two major forms of schistosomiasis affecting humans in sub-Saharan Africa are intestinal and urogenital schistosomiasis. Intestinal schistosomiasis is caused by blood fluke trematodes Schistosoma mansoni, S. intercalatum, and S. guineensis, while urogenital schistosomiasis is caused by S. haematobium [3]. The transmission cycle involves the release of eggs from infected humans into freshwater bodies through faeces or urine. These eggs hatch and release miracidia which penetrate suitable intermediate host snails. S. mansoni penetrates Biomphalaria spp. snails, S. haematobium penetrates Bulinus spp. snails., and S. mansoni could penetrate Bulinus spp. snails sometimes. Once miracidia infects the suitable snails, sporocysts develop in the snails, which then release cercariae into the water after the prepatent period [4]. Snails can shed hundreds of cercariae daily, ranging around 200 for S. haematobium and 250 to 600 for S. mansoni [5,6].
Substantial progress has been made over the years to prevent and control schistosomiasis by implementing large-scale periodic treatment with praziquantel. However, this has not completely interrupted schistosomiasis transmission [7]. Suggestions have been made on the need to adopt integrated control strategies, including preventive chemotherapy with praziquantel, intermediate host snail management, and improved water and sanitation. Following the adoption of the WHA70.16 on the Global Vector Control Response [8], there is a need for updated data on the infectivity of intermediate host snails (IHS) of schistosomiasis to justify investment in snail control and develop more effective prevention and control programs.
Many malacological studies on the infectivity of IHS in countries in Southern Africa have been conducted yet there has not been any single estimate of the infectivity of IHS for the entire Southern African countries. Such information would be essential in aiding policymakers working on the prevention and control of schistosomiasis. Hailegebriel et al. [9] reported a 6% prevalence of S. mansoni and S. haematobium in snail intermediate hosts in Africa. The study further suggested an increase in the pooled prevalence of schistosome cercaria in recent years among freshwater snails. However, only one study from the entire Southern Africa region was included, thus, potentially underestimating the potential risks of infections in this region, which has reported high schistosomiasis infections and snail abundance in several areas [9]. Hence, this study was designed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on a micro-geographical scale in Southern African countries to estimate the infectivity of IHS. A clear understanding of IHS infectivity is pivotal for effective planning of targeted disease control and sustainable strategies to interrupt schistosomiasis transmission.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategies and Inclusion Criteria

A comprehensive literature search of published articles on the infectivity of intermediate host snails that transmit the parasite that causes schistosomiasis in humans in Southern Africa was systematically conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from inception to 24 February 2022. The following search terms were used: “schistosome intermediate host”, “intermediate host snails”, “snail intermediate host”, “intermediate host”, “freshwater snails”, “freshwater snail host”, “snail vector”, “malacology survey”, “Biomphalaria”, “Bulinus”, “Bulinid”, “infection”, “infection rate”, “intensity”, “prevalence”, “incidence”, “schistosomiasis”, “bilharzia”, “bilharziasis”, “Schistosoma mansoni”, “S. haematobium”, “Schistosoma”, “Angola”, “Botswana”, “Lesotho”, “Malawi”, “Mozambique”, “Namibia”, “South Africa”, “Swaziland”, “Eswatini”, “Zambia”, and “Zimbabwe” (Supplementary Materials File S1). Search terms were combined by using the AND/OR Boolean operators. Our search was limited to peer-reviewed articles published in the English language. Relevant articles were also identified from the reference list of already identified articles. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline was used for the paper selection process [10].
The inclusion criteria for all articles were as follows: (a) studies reporting data from any Southern African country, (b) studies reporting data on human schistosomiasis intermediate host snails (Biomphalaria spp. and Bulinus spp.) to species level, (c) studies reporting the number of examined and infected snails with human schistosomes, (d) studies that mentioned the diagnostic used in detecting infected snails, and (e) studies that reported infection in snails that had been sampled from the field and not laboratory infected snails. Studies without full texts, review articles, and meta-analysis were excluded.

2.2. Data Extraction and Quality Appraisal

The data extraction format from the reviewed papers included the first author’s name, year of publication, study country, snail species, number of snails (collected, examined, and infected), and diagnostics used in detecting schistosome infection. The quality of all studies included was assessed by using the 10 quality-control items described by the Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence Critical Appraisal [11]. A score of 1 was given for each item fulfilled, while 0 was given for each unfulfilled item. An aggregate of all the scores was generated and converted into an index. Based on the quality indices generated, studies were classified as having low (0.0–0.3), moderate (0.4–0.6), or high (0.7–1.0) quality (Supplementary Materials File S2).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

An inverse variance heterogeneity (IVhet) model in MetaXL version 5.3 (meta-analysis add-in tool in Microsoft Excel) was used to obtain the pooled prevalence estimates from the eligible studies. The IVhet model was used because, irrespective of heterogeneity, the confidence interval coverage remains close to the nominal level compared to the fixed-effect and random-effect models, where the confidence interval drops significantly [12,13,14]. Forest plots were generated to show the estimated prevalence and their 95% confidence interval. The level of heterogeneity between studies was measured by using Cochran’s Q statistic, and Higgin’s inconsistency statistic ( i 2 ) was used to estimate the proportion of variability between studies. Higgins’s i 2 can be considered to show strong homogeneity, medium heterogeneity, and high heterogeneity when it has a value less than 25%, 50%, and 75%, respectively [15]. Publication bias was assessed by using the Luis Furuya–Kanamori (LFK) index of the Doi plot. The level of publication bias depended on the magnitude of the LFK index. An LFK value within the range of ‘ ± 1 ’ was considered as ‘symmetrical’ and classified as the absence of publication bias, an LFK value within the range of ‘ ± 2 ’ was considered as minor asymmetry with slight publication bias, and an LFK value outside the range of ‘ ± 2 ’ was considered as major asymmetry and high publication bias. Furthermore, subgroup analysis was carried out by stratifying our data by snail species and the countries where the studies were conducted to potentially explain the observed heterogeneity [16,17].

3. Results

3.1. Search Results

A total of 572 articles were identified, and 50 duplicated articles were removed. The remaining 522 records were screened by using the titles and abstracts, and 415 were excluded. One hundred and seven articles were then evaluated according to eligibility criteria. Seventy-nine articles were also excluded. Finally, 28 articles were included in the study, as they passed the eligibility criteria and quality assessment (Figure 1). The studies included in this review ranged from 1954 to 2021.

3.2. Study Characteristics and PPE Analysis

The twenty-eight (28) eligible studies included in the review were conducted in seven Southern Africa countries; 3.6% (n = 1) [18] were from Angola, 7.1% (n = 2) [19,20] were from Botswana, 17.9.5% (n = 5) [21,22,23,24,25] were from Malawi, 3.6% (n = 1) [26] were from Mozambique, 17.9% (n = 5) [27,28,29,30,31] were from South Africa, 3.6% (n = 1) [32] were from Zambia, and 46.4% [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45] (n = 13) were from Zimbabwe. Of the 28 studies, 6 studies reported on the infectivity rate in Bulinus spp., 5 studies reported on Biomphalaria spp., and 14 studies reported on both Bulinus spp. and Biomphalaria spp. All the studies used the cercarial shedding diagnostic to detect schistosome infections in the intermediate host snails. Furthermore, 10 studies were cross-sectional, and 18 studies were longitudinal (Table 1). Moreover, more snails were found in studies with a long study duration.
The overall pooled prevalence estimate (PPE) of infectivity was 1% (95% CI: 0.00–0.06), with a high degree of heterogeneity ( i 2 = 99%, p < 0.01) (Figure 2). The years of the studies included in the review were categorized into two groups, namely; the 1990s and 2000s, to assess the trends of snail infection rates in intermediate host snails between the periods. The pooled snail infectivity was 6% (95% CI: 0.01–0.12) in the 1990s and 1% (95% CI: 0.00–0.03) in the 2000s (Figure 2). The highest pooled prevalence of schistosome cercariae was obtained among freshwater snails from Mozambique (83%; 95% CI, 0.53–1.00), followed by Angola (14%; 95% CI, 0.10–0.20), Zambia (83%; 95% CI; 0.02–0.12), Zimbabwe (83%; 95% CI, 0.02–0.07), South Africa (83%; 95% CI; 0.00–0.09), Botswana (83%; 95% CI, 0.00–0.02), and Malawi (83%; 95% CI, 0.00–0.01) (Supplementary Figure S1). The subgroup analysis stratified by snail species showed that the rate of infectivity in Bulinus spp. was 1% (95% CI: 0.00–0.07), while in Biomphalaria spp., it was 2% (95% CI: 0.00–0.04) (Supplementary Figure S2). A high level of heterogeneity was observed ( i 2 > 90%), and this could not be reduced through subgroup analysis by intermediate host snail species. This could be due to the differences in the seasons the data were collected or the study designs [46]. A significant publication bias was observed both from the funnel and doi plots, as shown by the LFK index of 3.16, which indicates major asymmetry (Supplementary Figures S3 and S4).
Table 1 presents information extracted from the 28 eligible articles that included citation name, study duration, sample size, positive, infection rate, snail species, country, method of diagnosis and sampling type.

4. Discussion

In sub-Saharan Africa, schistosomiasis is one of the leading infectious diseases of public health importance coming after malaria [47,48,49]. In this meta-analysis, we analyzed studies on the infectivity of schistosome IHS in Southern Africa. Our findings show that the overall pooled prevalence of schistosome IHS in Southern Africa is low. This corroborates with previous studies which concluded that IHS infectivity can be as low as 1 to 2%, even in areas with a high prevalence of humans infected with schistosomiasis [50,51,52,53]. In Kisumu city, Western Kenya, the proportion of snails shedding schistosome cercariae was 1.8% despite the prevalence of schistosomiasis among school children being 21% and 3.6% for S. mansoni and S. haematobium, respectively [54,55]. Furthermore, a study performed in Msambweni, along the Kenyan coast, reported a snail infectivity rate of 1.2% [56], while the prevalence of S. haematobium among residents was 32.4% [57]. In the Lake Victoria basin in Western Kenya, snail infectivity was reported as 1.04% [58], whereas a high prevalence of S. mansoni of 60.5% was recorded among schoolchildren [59]. In Senegal, Catalano et al. [60] reported that 12.8% of school-aged children had S. mansoni infections, while the recorded snail infectivity was 2.2%. The prevalence of S. mansoni and S. haematobium in Toho-Todougha, Benin, was 74.3% and 57.1%, respectively, but the infection rate of B. pfeifferi was 0.56%, and the infectivity of B. forskalii and B. globosus were both 0% [61]. In Unguja Island, Tanzania, S. haematobium prevalence in school-aged children was 16.8% and 2.3% snail infectivity [62]. Several factors may be responsible for the discrepancy between snail infectivity and schistosomiasis prevalence. They include the method used in detecting schistosome infection, the ability of a few snails to release thousands of cercariae in a day, with the peak time for shedding cercariae from 9:00 to 11:00 a.m., followed by a decline at 5:00–7:00 p.m. [31,63]. This diurnal pattern of snail shedding coincides with the time people have intense water contact.
In contrast to the above, there are studies with high schistosomiasis prevalence and high snail infectivity. In our review, Cabo Delgabo province in Northern Mozambique, one of the least developed areas in the country, had the highest snail infectivity, at 83% [26]. This could be attributed to the high endemicity of schistosomiasis in the country, where they recorded a schistosomiasis prevalence of 84.4% [26]. The Schistosomiasis Consortium for Operational Research and Evaluation (SCORE) in 2011 coordinated a five-year study that was implemented in various African countries [64]. The goal of the SCORE project was to research integrated strategies that might stop transmission and achieve elimination. Preventive chemotherapy by using praziquantel treatment in Cabe Delgabo, Mozambique, resulted in a significant reduction in the prevalence of S. haematobium infection from Year 1 to Year 5, where the average prevalence reduced from 60.5% to 38.8% [64]. Despite this achievement, data on snail infectivity were not updated, thus suggesting the need for more malacology surveys in Mozambique. SCORE also undertook both malacology and parasitology surveys over 4 years to determine Biomphalaria snail abundance in Mwanza, Tanzania. A decrease in shedding Biomphalaria abundance in Year 4 was observed, and this was attributed to the schistosomiasis treatment that was ongoing in the human populations [65].
The pooled prevalence of intermediate host snails decreased over time, from 6% in the 1900s to 1% in the 2000s. This might be attributed to the increased health education in raising awareness on how schistosomiasis is contracted, and it has led to new lifestyles, improved water and sanitation, ongoing snail control programs, and the effects of climate change.
Biomphalaria snails serve as intermediate hosts for S. mansoni, while Bulinus snails act as intermediate hosts for S. haematobium and S. mattheei in Southern Africa [66]. This review showed that Bulinus snails were more abundant (n = 82,471) compared to Biomphalaria snails (n = 16,784). This could be because Bulinus snails are better equipped to withstand extreme temperatures, swift currents, and prolonged droughts better than Biomphalaria snails [67,68]. This finding is in contrast with the results obtained by Kinanpara et al. [69] and Hailegebriel, Nibret, and Munshea [9], where Biomphalaria snails had a higher abundance. Biomphalaria snails, on the other hand, had higher infectivity (2%) compared to Bulinus snails (1%) in Southern Africa.
In all the studies reviewed, the cercarial shedding technique was used to detect schistosome infections. This is a common diagnostic method used in detecting infections because it is relatively affordable and easy to carry out [55]. However, the cercarial shedding technique is known to underestimate the true prevalence of infection in the intermediate host snail, due to its inability to detect prepatent infections, the aborted development of sporocysts, and the death of the snail after collection and before light exposure, as well as being time-consuming and labor-intensive [2,70]. In addition, further laboratory analysis is needed to identify the specific type of cercariae. Hence, the method of infection detection may be partly responsible for the low pooled prevalence in this meta-analysis. To overcome these limitations, different types of molecular diagnostics which detect Schistosoma DNA in intermediate host snails have been developed and can identify patent and prepatent infections [70,71,72,73,74]. Studies have shown a significant difference in the prevalence of IHS schistosome infection between cercariae shedding and molecular diagnostics. Infection rates of 0%, 3%, 1.56%, and 0% [52,71,75,76] were reported when the cercarial shedding technique was used. However, when nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used, the reported infection rates were 2%, 3%, 39.6%, and 9.76% [52,71,75,76]. Furthermore, Sengupta et al. [77] reported that eDNA xenomonitoring detected schistosome presence at sites where cercarial shedding failed. However, due to the cost of the molecular diagnostic and the requirement of trained personnel to carry out molecular analysis, this approach is not commonly used. There is a need for the development of simple and field-friendly methods for the detection of Schistosoma in snails. This would provide a better picture of schistosomiasis in various countries in order to guide policymaking, prevention, and control [2].
A key limitation of our study and recommendation for additional work is the effect of seasonality on Schistosoma spp. infections in IHS. Of the 28 studies included in this review, only four studies [30,34,35,43] reported the effect of seasonality on Schistosoma infections. The studies showed an increased infection rate in the dry season compared to rainy seasons. However, only one out of the four studies reported the total number of snails collected in each season; hence, we could not ascertain the pooled prevalence per season. The seasonal pattern observed in the infection of Biomphalaria spp. and Bulinus spp. with mammalian schistosome cercariae where the prevalence of infection of snails with larval trematodes increased during the dry season and decreased during the rainy season is consistent with that observed in References [78,79].

5. Conclusions

The results from the review showed that 1% of Bulinus spp. and Biomphalaria spp. freshwater snails were infected. Although this overall pooled prevalence is low, the presence of an infected snail in a waterbody is evidence of schistosomiasis transmission and is of public health concern, as direct contact with the waterbody will lead to schistosomiasis infection. Furthermore, the cercarial shedding method used in detecting infection may have played a role in the low prevalence observed. Our results highlight the need for more malacology surveys using improved infectivity diagnostic methods in the Southern African region to enhance the detection of infection and integrated snail control strategies to interrupt schistosomiasis transmission.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/tropicalmed7050072/s1. File S1: Search strategy used to identify selected articles with the search terms; File S2: Quality assessment; Figure S1: Forest plot of subgrouped PPE by countries; Figure S2: Forest plot of subgrouped PPE by snail species. Figure S3: Funnel plot; Figure S4: Figure Doi plot.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.E.N. and M.J.C.; methodology, O.E.N.; data curation, O.E.N.; formal analysis, O.E.N.; writing—original draft preparation, O.E.N.; writing—review and editing, O.E.N., C.K. and M.J.C.; supervision, M.J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was conducted as part of the Ph.D. work of the first author. This research was commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Global Health Research program (16/136/33), UK and the University of KwaZulu-Natal through a Ph.D. studentship bursary awarded to Onyekachi Esther Nwoko by the College of Health Sciences. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The University of KwaZulu Natal biomedical research ethics committee (BREC) issued the ethical approval (Reference No. BREC/00001305/2020). This review is part of the approved thesis protocol.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Moses Chimbari, Chester Kalinda and Tafadzwa Mindu for organizing a systematic review and meta-analysis workshop that birth this article. The authors are indebted to Nokwanda Majola and Gombela Sambulo for the administrative and technical support provided.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Colley, D.G.; Bustinduy, A.L.; Secor, W.E.; King, C.H. Human schistosomiasis. Lancet 2014, 383, 2253–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nwoko, O.E.; Mogaka, J.J.; Chimbari, M.J. Challenges and Opportunities Presented by Current Techniques for Detecting Schistosome Infections in Intermediate Host Snails: A Scoping Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. World Health Organization. Schistosomiasis. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/schistosomiasis (accessed on 18 May 2021).
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Biology: Parasite-Schistosomiasis. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/schistosomiasis/biology.html/ (accessed on 14 August 2019).
  5. Braun, L.; Grimes, J.E.; Templeton, M.R. The effectiveness of water treatment processes against schistosome cercariae: A systematic review. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0006364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Nelwan, M.L. Schistosomiasis: Life cycle, diagnosis, and control. Curr. Ther. Res. 2019, 91, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zacharia, A.; Mushi, V.; Makene, T. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the rate of human schistosomiasis reinfection. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0243224. [Google Scholar]
  8. Moloo, A. Schistosomiasis Elimination: Refocusing on Snail Control to Sustain Progress. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/25-03-2020-schistosomiasis-elimination-refocusing-on-snail-control-to-sustain-progress (accessed on 25 March 2020).
  9. Hailegebriel, T.; Nibret, E.; Munshea, A. Prevalence of Schistosoma mansoni and S. haematobium in Snail Intermediate Hosts in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J. Trop. Med. 2020, 2020, 8850840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; Group, P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Munn, Z.; Moola, S.; Riitano, D.; Lisy, K. The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. Int. J. Health Policy Manag. 2014, 3, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Doi, S.A.; Barendregt, J.J.; Khan, S.; Thalib, L.; Williams, G.M. Advances in the meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials I: The inverse variance heterogeneity model. Contemp. Clin. Trials 2015, 45, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Doi, S.A.; Furuya-Kanamori, L. Selecting the best meta-analytic estimator for evidence-based practice: A simulation study. JBI Evid. Implement. 2020, 18, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Furuya-Kanamori, L.; Thalib, L.; Barendregt, J.J. Meta-analysis in evidence-based healthcare: A paradigm shift away from random effects is overdue. Int. J. Evid.-Based Healthc. 2017, 15, 152–160. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ahn, E.; Kang, H. Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean J. Anesthesiol. 2018, 71, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Higgins, J.P.; Thompson, S.G.; Deeks, J.J.; Altman, D.G.J.B. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003, 327, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Ioannidis, J.P. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2008, 14, 951–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Allan, F.; Sousa-Figueiredo, J.C.; Emery, A.M.; Paulo, R.; Mirante, C.; Sebastião, A.; Brito, M.; Rollinson, D. Mapping freshwater snails in north-western Angola: Distribution, identity and molecular diversity of medically important taxa. Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chimbari, M.J.; Kalinda, C.; Siziba, N. Changing patterns of Schistosoma host snail population densities in Maun, Botswana. Afr. J. Aquat. Sci. 2020, 45, 493–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. van Rensburg, C.J.; King, P.H.; van As, J.G. Furcocercous cercariae shed by the freshwater snails Pila occidentalis (Mousson, 1887) and Biomphalaria pfeifferi (Krauss, 1848) in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Afr. J. Aquat. Sci. 2016, 41, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cetron, M.S.; Chitsulo, L.; Sullivan, J.J.; Pilcher, J.; Wilson, M.; Noh, J.; Tsang, V.C.; Hightower, A.W.; Addiss, D.G. Schistosomiasis in Lake Malawi. Lancet 1996, 348, 1274–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Madsen, H.; Bloch, P.; Makaula, P.; Phiri, H.; Furu, P.; Stauffer, J.R., Jr. Schistosomiasis in Lake Malaŵi villages. EcoHealth 2011, 8, 163–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Madsen, H.; Stauffer, J.R. Density of Trematocranus placodon (Pisces: Cichlidae): A predictor of density of the schistosome intermediate host, Bulinus nyassanus (Gastropoda: Planorbidae), in Lake Malaŵi. EcoHealth 2011, 8, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Madsen, H.; Bloch, P.; Phiri, H.; Kristensen, T.; Furu, P. Bulinus nyassanus is an intermediate host for Schistosoma haematobium in Lake Malawi. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 2001, 95, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Poole, H.; Terlouw, D.J.; Naunje, A.; Mzembe, K.; Stanton, M.; Betson, M.; Lalloo, D.G.; Stothard, J.R. Schistosomiasis in pre-school-age children and their mothers in Chikhwawa district, Malawi with notes on characterization of schistosomes and snails. Parasites Vectors 2014, 7, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Traquinho, G.A.; Quintó, L.; Nalá, R.M.; Gama Vaz, R.; Corachan, M. Schistosomiasis in northern Mozambique. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1998, 92, 279–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bayer, F.A.H. Schistosome infection of snails in a dam traced to pollution with sewage. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1954, 48, 347–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Donnelly, F.A.; Appleton, C.C. Observations on the field transmission dynamics of Schistosoma mansoni and S. mattheei in southern Natal, South Africa. Parasitology 1985, 91, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. de Kock, K.N.; Wolmarans, C.T.; Bornman, M. Distribution and habitats of Biomphalaria pfeifferi, snail intermediate host of Schistosoma mansoni, in South Africa. Water SA 2004, 30, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Manyangadze, T.; Chimbari, M.J.; Rubaba, O.; Soko, W.; Mukaratirwa, S. Spatial and seasonal distribution of Bulinus globosus and Biomphalaria pfeifferi in Ingwavuma, uMkhanyakude district, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: Implications for schistosomiasis transmission at micro-geographical scale. Parasites Vectors 2021, 14, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wolmarans, C.T.; de Kock, K.N.; Strauss, H.D.; Bornman, M. Daily emergence of Schistosoma mansoni and S. haematobium cercariae from naturally infected snails under field conditions. J. Helminthol. 2002, 76, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Munbomba, L.M. Epidemiology of Human Schistosomiasis on the Shores of Lake Kariba at Siavonga, Zambia. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Liverpool, Liiverpool, UK, 1995; pp. 142–195. [Google Scholar]
  33. Chimbari, M.J.; Dhlomo, E.; Mwadiwa, E.; Mubila, L. Transmission of schistosomiasis in Kariba, Zimbabwe, and a cross-sectional comparison of schistosomiasis prevalences and intensities in the town with those in Siavonga in Zambia. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 2003, 97, 605–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chandiwana, S.K. How schistosoma-mansoni eggs reach natural waterbodies. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1986, 80, 963–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chandiwana, S.K. Community water-contact patterns and the transmission of schistosoma haematobium in the highveld region of Zimbabwe. Soc. Sci. Med. 1987, 25, 495–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chandiwana, S.K. Spatial heterogeneity in patterns of human schistosomiasis infection in the zimbabwean highveld. Cent. Afr. J. Med. 1988, 34, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Chandiwana, S.K.; Christensen, N.O.; Frandsen, F. Seasonal patterns in the transmission of Schistosoma haematobium, S. mattheei and S. mansoni in the highveld region of Zimbabwe. Acta Trop. 1987, 44, 433–444. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Chandiwana, S.K.; Taylor, P.; De Clarke, V.V. Prevalence and intensity of schistosomiasis in two rural areas in Zimbabwe and their relationship to village location and snail infection rates. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 1988, 82, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chandiwana, S.K.; Woolhouse, M.E. Heterogeneities in water contact patterns and the epidemiology of Schistosoma haematobium. Parasitology 1991, 103 Pt 3, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chingwena, G.; Mukaratirwa, S.; Kristensen, T.K.; Chimbari, M. Larval trematode infections in freshwater snails from the highveld and lowveld areas of Zimbabwe. J. Helminthol. 2002, 76, 283–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Chirundu, D.; Chimusoro, A.; Jones, D.; Midzi, N.; Mabaera, B.; Apollo, T.; Tshimanga, M. Schistosomiasis infection among school children in the Zhaugwe resettlement area, Zimbabwe April 2005. Cent. Afr. J. Med. 2007, 53, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mutsaka-Makuvaza, M.J.; Zhou, X.N.; Tshuma, C.; Abe, E.; Manasa, J.; Manyangadze, T.; Allan, F.; Chin’ombe, N.; Webster, B.; Midzi, N. Genetic diversity of Biomphalaria pfeifferi, the intermediate host of Schistosoma mansoni in Shamva district, Zimbabwe: Role on intestinal schistosomiasis transmission. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020, 47, 4975–4987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mutsaka-Makuvaza, M.J.; Zhou, X.N.; Tshuma, C.; Abe, E.; Manasa, J.; Manyangadze, T.; Allan, F.; Chinómbe, N.; Webster, B.; Midzi, N. Molecular diversity of Bulinus species in Madziwa area, Shamva district in Zimbabwe: Implications for urogenital schistosomiasis transmission. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Webster, J.P.; Davies, C.M.; Hoffman, J.I.; Ndamba, J.; Noble, L.R.; Woolhouse, M.E. Population genetics of the schistosome intermediate host Biomphalaria pfeifferi in the Zimbabwean highveld: Implications for co-evolutionary theory. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 2001, 95, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Woolhouse, M.E.; Chandiwana, S.K.; Bradley, M. On the distribution of schistosome infections among host snails. Int. J. Parasitol. 1990, 20, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Imrey, P.B. Limitations of meta-analyses of studies with high heterogeneity. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e1919325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Mnkugwe, R.H.; Minzi, O.S.; Kinung’hi, S.M.; Kamuhabwa, A.A.; Aklillu, E. Prevalence and correlates of intestinal schistosomiasis infection among school-aged children in North-Western Tanzania. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0228770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Verjee, M.A. Schistosomiasis: Still a cause of significant morbidity and mortality. Res. Rep. Trop. Med. 2019, 10, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Mawa, P.A.; Kincaid-Smith, J.; Tukahebwa, E.M.; Webster, J.P.; Wilson, S. Schistosomiasis morbidity hotspots: Roles of the human host, the parasite and their interface in the development of severe morbidity. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Alzaylaee, H.; Collins, R.A.; Rinaldi, G.; Shechonge, A.; Ngatunga, B.; Morgan, E.R.; Genner, M.J. Schistosoma species detection by environmental DNA assays in African freshwaters. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020, 14, e0008129. [Google Scholar]
  51. Angelo, T.; Shahada, F.; Kassuku, A.; Mazigo, H.; Kariuki, C.; Gouvras, A. Population abundance and disease transmission potential of snail intermediate hosts of human schistosomiasis in fishing communities of Mwanza region, north-western, Tanzania. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2014, 3, 1230–1236. [Google Scholar]
  52. Gandasegui, J.; Fernández-Soto, P.; Muro, A.; Simões Barbosa, C.; Lopes de Melo, F.; Loyo, R.; de Souza Gomes, E.C. A field survey using LAMP assay for detection of Schistosoma mansoni in a low-transmission area of schistosomiasis in Umbuzeiro, Brazil: Assessment in human and snail samples. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0006314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Satrija, F.; Ridwan, Y.; Rauf, A. Current status of schistosomiasis in Indonesia. Acta Trop. 2015, 141, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Odiere, M.R.; Opisa, S.; Odhiambo, G.; Jura, W.G.; Ayisi, J.M.; Karanja, D.M.; Mwinzi, P.N. Geographical distribution of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths among school children in informal settlements in Kisumu City, Western Kenya. Parasitology 2011, 138, 1569–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Opisa, S.; Odiere, M.R.; Jura, W.G.; Karanja, D.M.; Mwinzi, P.N. Malacological survey and geographical distribution of vector snails for schistosomiasis within informal settlements of Kisumu City, western Kenya. Parasites Vectors 2011, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Kariuki, H.C.; Clennon, J.A.; Brady, M.S.; Kitron, U.; Sturrock, R.F.; Ouma, J.H.; Ndzovu, S.T.M.; Mungai, P.; Hoffman, O.; Hamburger, J. Distribution patterns and cercarial shedding of Bulinus nasutus and other snails in the Msambweni area, Coast Province, Kenya. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2004, 70, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Clennon, J.A.; Mungai, P.L.; Muchiri, E.M.; King, C.H.; Kitron, U. Spatial and temporal variations in local transmission of Schistosoma haematobium in Msambweni, Kenya. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2006, 75, 1034–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Steinauer, M.L.; Mwangi, I.N.; Maina, G.M.; Kinuthia, J.M.; Mutuku, M.W.; Agola, E.L.; Mungai, B.; Mkoji, G.M.; Loker, E.S. Interactions between natural populations of human and rodent schistosomes in the Lake Victoria region of Kenya: A molecular epidemiological approach. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2008, 2, e222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Odiere, M.R.; Rawago, F.O.; Ombok, M.; Secor, W.E.; Karanja, D.M.; Mwinzi, P.N.; Lammie, P.J.; Won, K. High prevalence of schistosomiasis in Mbita and its adjacent islands of Lake Victoria, western Kenya. Parasites Vectors 2012, 5, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Catalano, S.; Léger, E.; Fall, C.B.; Borlase, A.; Diop, S.D.; Berger, D.; Webster, B.L.; Faye, B.; Diouf, N.D.; Rollinson, D. Multihost transmission of Schistosoma mansoni in Senegal, 2015–2018. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ibikounlé, M.; Mouahid, G.; Sakiti, N.; Massougbodji, A.; Moné, H. Freshwater snail diversity in Benin (West Africa) with a focus on human schistosomiasis. Acta Trop. 2009, 111, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Pennance, T.; Person, B.; Muhsin, M.A.; Khamis, A.N.; Muhsin, J.; Khamis, I.S.; Mohammed, K.A.; Kabole, F.; Rollinson, D.; Knopp, S. Urogenital schistosomiasis transmission on Unguja Island, Zanzibar: Characterisation of persistent hot-spots. Parasites Vectors 2016, 9, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Ismail, H.A.H.A.; Ahmed, A.e.A.A.e.R.M.; Cha, S.; Jin, Y. The Life Histories of Intermediate Hosts and Parasites of Schistosoma haematobium and Schistosoma mansoni in the White Nile River, Sudan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Phillips, A.E.; Gazzinelli-Guimaraes, P.H.; Aurelio, H.O.; Ferro, J.; Nala, R.; Clements, M.; King, C.H.; Fenwick, A.; Fleming, F.M.; Dhanani, N. Assessing the benefits of five years of different approaches to treatment of urogenital schistosomiasis: A SCORE project in Northern Mozambique. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0006061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Gouvras, A.N.; Allan, F.; Kinung’hi, S.; Rabone, M.; Emery, A.; Angelo, T.; Pennance, T.; Webster, B.; Nagai, H.; Rollinson, D.J.P.; et al. Longitudinal survey on the distribution of Biomphalaria sudanica and B. choanomophala in Mwanza region, on the shores of Lake Victoria, Tanzania: Implications for schistosomiasis transmission and control. Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Kruger, F.; Joubert, P.; Pretorius, S. Ratio of Schistosoma haematobium to S. mattheei infections in Bulinus africanus snails from rural areas in the eastern Transvaal lowveld in South Africa. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1990, 84, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Malek, E.A. Factors conditioning the habitat of bilharziasis intermediate hosts of the family Planorbidae. Bull. World Health Organ. 1958, 18, 785. [Google Scholar]
  68. Joubert, P.; Pretorius, S.; De Kock, K.; Van Eeden, J. The effect of constant low temperatures on the survival of Bulinus africanus (Krauss), Bulinus globosus (Morelet) and Biomphalaria pfeifferi (Krauss). S. Afr. J. Zool. 1984, 19, 314–316. [Google Scholar]
  69. Kinanpara, K.; Yves, B.K.; Félix, K.K.; Edia, E.O.; Théophile, G.; Germain, G. Freshwater snail dynamics focused on potential risk of using urine as fertilizer in Katiola, an endemic area of schistosomiasis (Ivory Coast; West Africa). J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 2013, 1, 110–115. [Google Scholar]
  70. Fuss, A.; Mazigo, H.D.; Mueller, A. Malacological survey to identify transmission sites for intestinal schistosomiasis on Ijinga Island, Mwanza, north-western Tanzania. Acta Trop. 2020, 203, 105289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Farghaly, A.; Saleh, A.A.; Mahdy, S.; Abd El-Khalik, D.; Abd El-Aal, N.F.; Abdel-Rahman, S.A.; Salama, M.A. Molecular approach for detecting early prepatent Schistosoma mansoni infection in Biomphalaria alexandrina snail host. J. Parasit. Dis. 2016, 40, 805–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Abath, F.G.; Gomes, A.L.d.V.; Melo, F.L.; Barbosa, C.S.; Werkhauser, R.P. Molecular approaches for the detection of Schistosoma mansoni: Possible applications in the detection of snail infection, monitoring of transmission sites, and diagnosis of human infection. Mem. Do Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2006, 101, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Abbasi, I.; King, C.H.; Muchiri, E.M.; Hamburger, J. Detection of Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma haematobium DNA by loop-mediated isothermal amplification: Identification of infected snails from early prepatency. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2010, 83, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Bakuza, J.S.; Gillespie, R.; Nkwengulila, G.; Adam, A.; Kilbride, E.; Mable, B.K. Assessing S. mansoni prevalence in Biomphalaria snails in the Gombe ecosystem of western Tanzania: The importance of DNA sequence data for clarifying species identification. Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hamburger, J.; Hoffman, O.; Kariuki, H.C.; Muchiri, E.M.; Ouma, J.H.; Koech, D.K.; Sturrock, R.F.; King, C.H. Large-scale, polymerase chain reaction-based surveillance of Schistosoma haematobium DNA in snails from transmission sites in coastal Kenya: A new tool for studying the dynamics of snail infection. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2004, 71, 765–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Okeke, O.C.; Akinwale, O.P.; Ubachukwu, P.O.; Gyang, P.V.; Henry, E.U.; Nwafor, T.E.; Daniel, B.M.; Ebi, S.E.; Anorue, C.O.; Chukwuka, C.O. Report of high prevalence of schistosome infection in Biomphalaria snails from a geographic area with no previous prevalence of human schistosomiasis in Nigeria. Acta Trop. 2020, 210, 105326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sengupta, M.E.; Hellström, M.; Kariuki, H.C.; Olsen, A.; Thomsen, P.F.; Mejer, H.; Willerslev, E.; Mwanje, M.T.; Madsen, H.; Kristensen, T.K. Environmental DNA for improved detection and environmental surveillance of schistosomiasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 8931–8940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Moser, W.; Greter, H.; Schindler, C.; Allan, F.; Ngandolo, B.N.; Moto, D.D.; Utzinger, J.; Zinsstag, J. The spatial and seasonal distribution of Bulinus truncatus, Bulinus forskalii and Biomphalaria pfeifferi, the intermediate host snails of schistosomiasis, in N’Djamena, Chad. Geospat. Health 2014, 9, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Rabone, M.; Wiethase, J.H.; Allan, F.; Gouvras, A.N.; Pennance, T.; Hamidou, A.A.; Webster, B.L.; Labbo, R.; Emery, A.M.; Garba, A.D.J.P.; et al. Freshwater snails of biomedical importance in the Niger River Valley: Evidence of temporal and spatial patterns in abundance, distribution and infection with Schistosoma spp. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of the studies included in the meta-analysis.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of the studies included in the meta-analysis.
Tropicalmed 07 00072 g001
Figure 2. Forest plot of subgrouped PPE analysis of infectivity in the 1900s and 2000s [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. [a] and [b] represents Bulinus spp. and Biomphalaria spp. respectively when both species are of interest to the author(s). [1a] and [1b] represents Bulinus spp. and Biomphalaria spp. respectively when both species are of interest to the author(s) and is the first of two articles published in the same year by the same authors. [2a] and [2b] represents Bulinus spp. and Biomphalaria spp. respectively when both species are of interest to the author(s) and is the second article published in the same year.
Figure 2. Forest plot of subgrouped PPE analysis of infectivity in the 1900s and 2000s [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. [a] and [b] represents Bulinus spp. and Biomphalaria spp. respectively when both species are of interest to the author(s). [1a] and [1b] represents Bulinus spp. and Biomphalaria spp. respectively when both species are of interest to the author(s) and is the first of two articles published in the same year by the same authors. [2a] and [2b] represents Bulinus spp. and Biomphalaria spp. respectively when both species are of interest to the author(s) and is the second article published in the same year.
Tropicalmed 07 00072 g002
Table 1. Summary of eligible studies included in the meta-analysis.
Table 1. Summary of eligible studies included in the meta-analysis.
Citation NameStudy DurationSample SizePositiveInfection
Rate (%)
Snail SpeciesCountryMethod of DiagnosisSampling Type
Chimbari et al. (2003) [a] [33] 1 year12043.33B. globosusZimbabweCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Chimbari et al. (2003) [33] [b]1 year4224.76B. pfeifferiZimbabweCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Chimbari et al. 2020 [a] [19] 3 years30300B. globosusBotswanaCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Chimbari et al. (2020) [b] [19]3 years19900B. pfeifferiBotswanaCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Chandiwana et al. (1988) [1a] [38] 2 years42371423.35B. globosusZimbabweCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Chandiwana et al. (1988) [1b] [38] 2 years116390.77B. pfeifferiZimbabweCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Mutsaka-Makuvaza et al. (2020) [43] 1 year1542301.95B. globosusZimbabweCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Chirundo et al. (2005) [a] [41] 1 month3400B. globosusZimbabweCercarial sheddingCross-sectional
Chirundo et al. (2005) [b] [41] 1 month8600B. pfeifferiZimbabweCercarial sheddingCross-sectional
Allan et al. (2017) [18] 2 months1732514.45B. globosusAngolaCercarial sheddingCross-sectional
Manyangadze et al. (2021) [a] [30] 1 year861778.94B. globosusSouth AfricaCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Manyangadze et al. (2021) [a] [30] 1 year98510.10B. pfeifferiSouth AfricaCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Chandiwana et al. (1986) [34] 2 years1347413.04B. pfeifferiZimbabweCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Woolhouse et al. (1989) [45] 2 months2252812.44B. globosusZimbabweCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Traquinho et al. (1998) [a] [26] 2 months40734584.77Bulinus spp.MozambiqueCercarial sheddingCross-sectional
Traquinho et al. (1998) [b] [26] 2 months311961.29Biomphalaria spp.MozambiqueCercarial sheddingCross-sectional
Bayer et al. (1954) [a] [27] 2 months482316.43Bulinus spp.South AfricaCercarial sheddingCross-sectional
Bayer et al. (1954) [b] [27] 2 months5205310.19Biomphalaria spp.South AfricaCercarial sheddingCross-sectional
Cetron et al. (1996) [21] 2 months37010.27Bulinus spp.MalawiCercarial sheddingCross-sectional
Chingwena et al. (2002) [a] [40] 2 years2934732.49Bulinus spp.ZimbabweCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Chingwena et al. (2002) [b] [40] 2 years253510.04Biomphalaria spp.ZimbabweCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
KN de Kock et al. (2004) [29] Not stated163900Biomphalaria spp.South AfricaCercarial sheddingCross-sectional
Donney et al. (1985) [28] 1 year 4 months3062622.02Biomphalaria spp.South AfricaCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Van Renburg et al. (2016) [a] [20] 2 months33300Bulinus spp.BotswanaCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Van Renburg et al. (2016) [b] [20] 2 months32582.46Biomphalaria spp.BotswanaCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Webster et al. (2010) [44] 1 month1099423.82Biomphalaria spp.ZimbabweCercarial sheddingCross-sectional
Wolmarans et al. (2001) [a] [31] 1 year76713016.95Bulinus spp.South AfricaCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Wolmarans et al. (2001) [b] [31] 1 year93210811.59Biomphalaria spp.South AfricaCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Mutsaka-Mukuvaza et al. (2020) [42] 1 year54240.74Biomphalaria spp.ZimbabweCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Madsen et al. (2011) [23] 3 years 10 months 1220.25Bulinus spp.MalawiCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Madsen et al. (2011) [1a] [22] 4 years1970201.02Bulinus spp.MalawiCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Madsen et al. (2011) [1b] [22] 4 years 6664220.33Bulinus spp.MalawiCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Chandiwana et al. (1987) [35] 2 years44521643.68Bulinus spp.ZimbabweCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Chandiwana et al. (1988) [2a] [36] 2 years185122211.99Bulinus spp.ZimbabweCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Chandiwana et al. (1988) [2b] [36] 2 years715162.24Biomphalaria spp.ZimbabweCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Chandiwana et al. (1987) [a] [37] 2 years445261713.86Bulinus spp.ZimbabweCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Chandiwana et al. (1987) [b] [37] 2 years1347413.04Biomphalaria spp.ZimbabweCercarial sheddingLongitudinal
Chandiwana et al. (1991) [39] 2 months285124.21Bulinus spp.ZimbabweCercarial sheddingCross-sectional
Mungomba et al. (1995) [a] [32] 1 month13542.96Bulinus spp.ZambiaCercarial sheddingCross-sectional
Mungomba et al. (1995) [a] [32] 1 month215177.91Biomphalaria spp.ZambiaCercarial sheddingCross-sectional
Madsen et al. (2001) [24]1 month99250.50Bulinus spp.MalawiCercarial sheddingCross-sectional
Poole et al. (2014) [25]1 month25000Bulinus spp.MalawiCercarial sheddingCross-sectional
[a] and [b] represents Bulinus spp. and Biomphalaria spp. respectively when both species are of interest to the author(s). [1a] and [1b] represents Bulinus spp. and Biomphalaria spp. respectively when both species are of interest to the author(s) and is the first of two articles published in the same year by the same authors. [2a] and [2b] represents Bulinus spp. and Biomphalaria spp. respectively when both species are of interest to the author(s) and is the second article published in the same year by the same authors.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nwoko, O.E.; Kalinda, C.; Chimbari, M.J. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Infection Rates of Schistosome Transmitting Snails in Southern Africa. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7, 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7050072

AMA Style

Nwoko OE, Kalinda C, Chimbari MJ. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Infection Rates of Schistosome Transmitting Snails in Southern Africa. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2022; 7(5):72. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7050072

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nwoko, Onyekachi Esther, Chester Kalinda, and Moses John Chimbari. 2022. "Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Infection Rates of Schistosome Transmitting Snails in Southern Africa" Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 7, no. 5: 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7050072

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop