Next Article in Journal
Phylogeography of Bulinus truncatus (Audouin, 1827) (Gastropoda: Planorbidae) in Selected African Countries
Next Article in Special Issue
Evolution of Tuberculosis/Human Immunodeficiency Virus Services among Different Integrated Models in Myanmar: A Health Services Review
Previous Article in Journal
Artemether and Praziquantel: Origin, Mode of Action, Impact, and Suggested Application for Effective Control of Human Schistosomiasis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tuberculosis Elimination in the Asia-Pacific Region and the WHO Ethics Guidance
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Is Australia Neglecting the Local Topography When It Comes to Catastrophic Costs and Ending Tuberculosis?

Victorian Tuberculosis Program, Melbourne Health, Parkville 3050, Australia
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2018, 3(4), 126;
Received: 7 November 2018 / Revised: 14 December 2018 / Accepted: 14 December 2018 / Published: 19 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tuberculosis Elimination in the Asia-Pacific)
PDF [2351 KB, uploaded 19 December 2018]
  |     |  


Efforts to eliminate tuberculosis as a public health problem require reductions in mortality, incidence, and the eradication of associated catastrophic costs; however, the question of catastrophic costs is often neglected, particularly in the context of low-incidence settings like Australia. This study reviews the financial support provided to those identified as in need, and in receipt, of economic aid from the Victorian Tuberculosis Program. The study design used Epstein’s clinical data mining framework to produce descriptive statistics which were supplemented by clinical collaboration. A consistent one-third of those receiving care from the Program due to a notification of active tuberculosis received emergency financial relief over the study period. Overwhelmingly, funds were used to relieve financial distress, and each year approximately one-third of the expenditure was used to support 2% of those people notified as affected by tuberculosis (or 7–9% of those in receipt of funds). Many of this 2% experienced income loss and expenditure that may be considered catastrophic. Further investigation is needed to better define and understand the nature of catastrophic costs in the context of universal health care and existing low tuberculosis incidence. View Full-Text
Keywords: tuberculosis; socio-economic; catastrophic costs; financial tuberculosis; socio-economic; catastrophic costs; financial

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Watts, K. Is Australia Neglecting the Local Topography When It Comes to Catastrophic Costs and Ending Tuberculosis? Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2018, 3, 126.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. EISSN 2414-6366 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top