The Vicious Cycle Atlas of Fragility: Mapping the Feedback Loops Between Industrial–Urban Metabolism and Earth System Collapse
Abstract
1. Introduction
- Local interventions: Deployment of urban nature-based solutions such as green infrastructure, permeable surfaces, constructed wetlands, and expanded urban forest canopy to enhance ecosystem functions.
- Regional stewardship: Transboundary governance for hinterland ecosystem management. This includes metropolitan-funded watershed conservation to secure hydrological services, biodiversity corridor maintenance enabling genetic exchange, and agricultural landscape diversification supporting pollination services.
- International policy architectures aim to stabilize the global system by aligning industrial–urban activity with planetary boundaries. Key mechanisms include supply chain due diligence protocols to prevent deforestation in critical carbon sinks, high-seas marine protected areas to preserve oceanic carbon sequestration, and cryosphere conservation treaties to mitigate albedo loss.
- How do industrial–urban metabolic processes such as resource extraction and waste generation transgress planetary boundaries across spatial scale?
- What feedback mechanisms, for example, cryosphere albedo loss and deforestation-driven carbon sink degradation, amplify Earth system destabilization?
- Can multi-scale nature-based regenerative solutions (M-NbRSs) synchronize industrial–urban systems with planetary boundaries while delivering socio-ecological co-benefits?
- Formalized testable hypotheses in the conceptual underpinning (Section 4).
- Global high-entropy resource throughput, which exceeds 100 billion tons a year, correlates with transgression of planetary boundaries including biosphere integrity, hydrosphere stability, and atmospheric or climate resilience.
- Amplifying feedback loops: for example, permafrost thaw accelerates global warming through positive feedback loops, releasing methane, a greenhouse gas (GHG) that is 28 times more potent than CO2 over 100 years.
- M-NbRS implementation contributes to reducing high-entropy waste such as GHGs and pollution while enhancing cross-scale resilience, for example, urban cooling and carbon sequestration.
- Coupling spatial scales: Local green infrastructure, such as permeable surfaces, directly funds regional conservation, such as watersheds, via fiscal mechanisms like sustainability-linked bonds (Section 7.1).
- Binding policies to boundaries: Global protocols, such as deforestation-free supply chains, enforce compliance with biophysical thresholds, for example, Ωarag > 2.75, an integration absent in prior urban sustainability frameworks.
- Halts high-entropy waste externalization (GHG emissions, pollution);
- Realigns human activity with planetary boundaries;
- Prevents cascading tipping points;
- Delivers equitable resilience with socio-ecological co-benefits.
- Theoretical innovation
- »
- An original framework to integrate urban–industrial metabolism into planetary boundaries, redefining sustainability as a quantifiable planetary obligation [21].
- »
- Transcends urban-centric NbSs by scaling ecological stewardship from local to global.
- Critical gap resolution
- »
- Exposes telecoupled impacts, for example, urban consumption driving distant deforestation/ocean acidification.
- »
- Challenges fragmented approaches that prioritize local greening over systemic interdependencies.
- Systems reframing
- »
- Repositions cities as symbiotic custodians of Earth’s systems, enforcing accountability via planetary boundaries.
- Actionable roadmapProposes tiered strategies to align urban–industrial metabolism with planetary boundaries, translating global thresholds into actionable scales:
- »
- Local: mandate regenerative infrastructure aligned with the novel entities boundary.
- »
- Regional: legally bind cities to hinterland conservation such as transboundary watershed protection.
- »
- Global: enforce extraterritorial impact accountability such as supply chain deforestation.
- Policy transformationEquips policymakers with metrics directly linking urban performance to planetary boundary compliance, such as
- »
- Connecting carbon neutrality to Arctic stability;
- »
- Tying urban resilience to rainforest preservation;
- »
- Enforcing ecological reciprocity mechanisms.
2. Literature Review
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Resource Flow
- Material flows and circularity
- Compiled from the Circular Economy Report 2023 [2] documenting
- »
- Annual global material throughput: 100 billion tons.
- »
- Circularity rate: <9% (2020–2023 average).
- Energy metabolism
- Land system impacts including mining, agriculture, and timber extraction footprints from
3.2. Earth System Stressor Quantification
- Contemporary CO2 concentrations (424.61 ppm in 2024) from Mauna Loa Observatory records [31] were used.
- Biospheric pressures emerged from Global Forest Watch deforestation alerts (61.56 million ha of tropical forests lost since 2001) [5].
- Biodiversity risk: IPBES (2019) Global Assessment [35] documents that one million species face extinction risk, with 75% of terrestrial environments severely altered by human activities.
3.3. Translating Resource Flows into Systemic Threshold
- Industrial ecology metrics such as material throughout or fossil fuel dependence;
- Planetary boundary frameworks such as atmospheric CO2 concentration and biosphere integrity;
- Cross-domain stressor mapping (Table 1).
- Causal pathways, for example, fossil fuel combustion → CO2 emissions →cryosphere destabilization;
- Quantitative thresholds, for example, 26 GtC/yr emissions → 424.61 ppm → 28 trillion tons of ice loss. This translation is formalized in Table 2 in the Results Section below.
3.4. Results
4. Conceptual Underpinning: Systems Thinking and Dynamics
- Disturbances: unintended forces such as GHG emissions driving radiative forcing;
- Control signals: policy interventions such as carbon pricing policies.
- Delays/nonlinearities as demonstrated by GHG emissions → radiative forcing (immediate) → ice melt (delayed);
- Feedback dependencies as exemplified by carbon tax → emissions reduction (short-term) → gradual warming (long-term).
- Positive feedback amplifies change, for example, ice melt → albedo reduction → warming further melt;
- Negative feedback stabilizes; for example, engineered negative feedback can stabilize ocean systems—for instance, artificial enhancement raises pH to improve CO2 uptake and counteract acidification.
- Conversely, negative (balancing) feedback acts to stabilize the system, counteracting deviations and promoting equilibrium, as seen when phytoplankton blooms absorb CO2, temporarily offsetting emissions and dampening atmospheric concentration increase [41]. These elements—inputs, outputs, stocks, flows, and feedback loops—collectively define a system’s structure and dynamics.
- Reinforcing feedback (red arrows): Increased atmospheric CO2 [x1(t) > 0] reinforces warming impact due to increased atmospheric CO2 concentrations, leading to ice melt and albedo reduction. This amplifies solar absorption, aggravating further warming.
- Stabilizing feedback (blue arrows): Ocean CO2 uptake [x2(t) < 0] converts atmospheric CO2 to dissolved organic carbon, reducing the warming effect, slowing ice melt, and, hence, moderating equilibrium shift. While the ocean carbon sink provides net stabilizing feedback for the atmosphere, it constitutes a compound feedback system with embedded positive loops due to thermodynamic tradeoffs. Sustained CO2 absorption beyond saturation thresholds induces ocean heating and thermal expansion and reduces future uptake capacity.
Quantifying Feedback Loops
- Mechanism
- Empirical validation
- »
- Cryosphere: 28 trillion tons of ice loss (1994–2024) accelerate albedo reduction, increasing warming three times faster than global averages (Section 7.4).
- »
- Biosphere: tropical deforestation (61.56 Mha since 2001) reduces carbon sinks, intensifying atmospheric CO2 (Section 8.2).
5. Industrial–Urban System: A Metabolic Perspective
- The industrial subsystem focuses on capital- and energy-intensive activities. Its scope spans primary industries such as raw material extraction, including mining and agriculture, and secondary industries covering material transformation through manufacturing, such as steel and chemical production. Key traits include high material/energy throughput and the generation of foundational inputs for economic production such as machinery and goods and services.
- The urban subsystem centers on consumption patterns and service provision. Its scope encompasses tertiary industries including healthcare, education, and finance and quaternary industries covering knowledge-based sectors like IT and R&D, while also providing social amenities like housing and public spaces. Key traits include networked infrastructure such as transport and utilities and support for light industries, for example, textiles and electronics.
5.1. Entropy, Thermodynamics, and Industrial–Urban Metabolism
- Urban heat islands, amplified by waste heat, elevate local temperatures by 2–5 °C, escalating energy demand and emissions [43].
- The accelerated production and release of novel entities—including plastics, pesticides, industrial compounds, and antibiotics—now exceeds the planetary boundary for chemical pollution. This breach of humanity’s safe operating space critically erodes biosphere integrity by disrupting biogeochemical cycles and ecosystem resilience [44].
- Heavy metals—persistent, high-entropy pollutants—disperse systemic disorder through Earth’s hydrosphere, biosphere, and lithosphere. Their bioaccumulation threatens ecosystem resilience and human health across all trophic levels, exemplifying transboundary novel entity risks that destabilize planetary boundaries [45,46,47].
5.2. Industrial–Urban Systems: Manifestation of (Low) Entropy Paradox
- Atmospheric destabilization: GHG emissions trigger feedback loops such as permafrost thaw that accelerate warming (see Table 2 above).
- Entropic legacies: non-recyclable waste such as plastics persists for millennia, irreversibly altering ecosystems [51].
6. Earth System Science and Ecology
6.1. Earth System Science in Perspective
6.1.1. Atmosphere: Earth’s Climate Regulator
6.1.2. Hydrosphere: Oceanic Climate Stabilization
6.1.3. Cryosphere: Earth’s Fragile Thermostat
6.1.4. Lithosphere: Planetary Carbon Archive
6.1.5. Biosphere: Climate-Regulating Web of Life
7. The Anthroposphere: Vicious Cycle Atlas of Fragility—Cascading Feedback in Industrial–Urban Systems
7.1. Sphere-Specific Dynamics
- Biosphere dynamics
- Amplifying feedback (degradation cycles)
- Stabilizing feedback (restorative pathways)
- »
- Agroforestry adoption→ pollinator habitat recovery → ecosystem resilience.
- Interconnections: thresholds/risks
Linked to atmospheric CO2 rise (424.6 ppm) via carbon sink loss [31]. - Hydrosphere dynamics
- Amplifying feedback (degradation cycles)
- »
- »
- Overfishing → fishery stock depletion → food insecurity → increased fishing pressure.
- Cross-system CO2 cascade
- »
- Atmospheric CO2 → simultaneous warming and acidification → reduced oceanic CO2 absorption → accelerated global warming → coral reef degradation.
- Lithosphere dynamics
- »
- Mining activities → soil degradation → increased land instability/increased landslide occurrences;
- »
- Urban sprawl → habitat fragmentation → erosion acceleration.
- CryosphereAmplifying feedback (degradation cycles)
- Atmosphere dynamics: anthroposphere driver
- »
- Fossil fuel combustion → CO2 accumulation (424.6 ppm in 2024) [31] → enhanced radiative forcing.
7.2. Industrial–Urban Metabolic Crisis
- Material footprint: Construction consumes 40–50% of global raw materials driving agricultural and mining expansion that converted 420 million hectares (Mha) of forests into cropland/mining sites (1990–2020) [107,108,109,110,111]. This land transformation is accelerating, with mining output surging 56% (2000–2020) to 17.2 B tons/year [112] and cropland expanding 9% (2003–2019)—most rapidly in Africa and South America [113].
- Ecological overshoot: Collectively, these pressures exceed Earth’s regenerative capacity by 75%—equivalent to consuming resources of 1.75 Earths [114].
7.3. Entrenched Fossil Dominance and Climate Feedback Cycles
- Transport networks (road, rail, and air) expand fossil dependence alongside urban sprawl.
- Hard infrastructure (dams, grids) relies on CO2-intensive steel/concrete, contributing to 39% global carbon footprints.
- Urban energy systems still meet 87% of electricity demand through fossil fuels.
7.4. Resource Extraction Frontiers: Mining and Agriculture as Drivers of Biospheric Collapse
- Mining’s multi-sphere impact
- »
- Lithospheric degradation: soil erosion and compaction affect 5.57 million ha globally (2020), with impacts extending 70 km beyond mine site.
- »
- Agricultural expansion: the primary driver of biospheric degradation
- Industrial emissions and Earth system destabilization
- Climate feedback dynamics and hydrological cascadesPlanetary warming is now being driven primarily by self-reinforcing climate feedback mechanisms that have surpassed direct anthropogenic forcing in their impact. Two critical feedback loops are accelerating global temperature rise and hydrological disruption.
- (a)
- The Arctic is warming at triple the global average rate due to dramatic reductions in surface reflectivity. As ice and snow cover melt, albedo decreases from 0.9 to just 0.1—a 90% reduction in solar radiation reflection. This creates a vicious cycle where increased absorption of solar energy leads to further warming, additional ice loss, and accelerated permafrost thaw, with impacts exceeding previous climate model projections [17,18,141,142].
- (b)
- Water vapor–temperature feedback: Each 1 °C rise enables 7% more atmospheric water vapor (Clausius–Clapeyron scaling). Accounting for 50% of total greenhouse forcing, vapor traps additional heat, intensifying extreme precipitation and altering global hydrology [139,140]. The Earth’s climate system is approaching critical thresholds through interconnected hydrospheric destabilization processes, with three primary manifestations of growing concern:
- (i)
- AMOC weakening and potential collapseThe Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), which redistributes heat on our planet and has a major impact on climate, has weakened by approximately 15% since the mid-20th century [143,144]. This critical circulation system, responsible for redistributing heat across the Atlantic basin, now shows multiple indicators of approaching a tipping point [137]. Paleoclimate evidence suggests that such weakening can precede abrupt collapses, with modern observations revealing
- »
- Reduced deep water formation in the Labrador Sea;
- »
- Changing surface salinity patterns;
- »
- Shifting oceanic heat transport.
- (ii)
- Hydrospheric feedback amplification
- (iii)
- Compound climate extremes and Earth system destabilizationThe interplay between atmospheric and biospheric systems is accelerating climate extremes through the following synergistic feedback loops:
- »
- Heatwave intensification: At 1.5 C of global warming, heatwaves last 2–3 times longer due to atmospheric blocking and soil moisture depletion. Tropical megacities like Jakarta and Lagos will face 120–150 additional lethal heat days/year by 2050 [149].
- »
- »
- Cryospheric collapse: Global sea-level rise now reaches 3.6 mm/yr (2.5 times faster than 1900s), with regional spikes of 15–20 cm since 1993 [100,132,133]. This stems from thermal expansion and cryospheric collapse, particularly in Greenland and Antarctica [34,132,133], which exacerbate coastal flooding through sterodynamic feedback [32,133,154].
- »
- Greenland’s meltwater disrupts ocean currents, amplifying coastal flooding [155,156,157,158]. Critically, meltwater from Greenland disrupts North Atlantic deep convection, amplifying sea-level rise along the U.S. East Coast [155,156], while freshwater influx reduces ocean salinity, accelerating ice-shelf melt [157,158]. These processes represent a mass transfer from ice reservoirs to oceans, with cascading geophysical impacts, including shifts in Earth’s rotational inertia.
8. Discussion: Earth System Destabilization and Pathways for Regeneration
- Telecoupled governance: Transboundary coordination of hinterland conservation, as demonstrated by the Heart of Borneo’s 24 Mha trilateral protection scheme, creates closed-loop accountability through (i) joint policymaking between Brunei, Indonesia, and Malaysia, (ii) harmonized land-use monitoring across political borders, and (iii) reciprocal enforcement of conservation commitments. Noteworthy is the HoBI where Indonesia’s Kalimantan, the Malaysian states of Sarawak and Sabah, and Brunei Darussalam collaborate under the HoB Strategic Action Plan to establish 2.4 Mha of protected area—later expanded to 2.69 Mha—for cross border conservation and CO2 reduction This transboundary initiative directly addresses metabolic imbalances by preserving governance models that directly address metabolic imbalances by preserving low-entropy stocks such as primary rainforests while mitigating entropic waste such as carbon emissions, demonstrating institutional alignment with biospheric limits.
- Dynamic feedback tools: The Vicious Cycle Atlas of Fragility (Figure 5) diagnoses leverage points. For example, permafrost insulation creates a positive feedback loop—slowing thaw reduces emissions, which moderates regional warming, further protecting permafrost. More specifically, permafrost insulation does not just stabilize carbon stocks (lithosphere); it also reduces methane emissions (atmosphere), protects Arctic ecosystems (biosphere), and supports Indigenous livelihoods (anthroposphere). Mapping these cascading benefits demonstrates the intervention’s high leverage potential.
8.1. PathwayRegeneration: Policy Implications for Earth System Stabilization
Multi-Scalar Nature-Based Regenerative Solutions (M-NbRSs)—Industrial–Urban System-Based | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Function/Role/Means | Mechanism | Case Study | Outcome | |
Urban greening for climate mitigation | ||||
Urban forests and street trees | Heat island reduction | Tree transpiration and blockage of solar radiation | Global assessment of tree-related cooling effects | Lowers pedestrian temperature by up to 12 °C through large radiation blockage and transpiration [169]. |
Reduces peak monthly temperatures to below 26 °C in 83% of the cities [169]. | ||||
European cities: cooling effects of urban trees | Increasing tree coverage to 30%: cool cities by a mean of 0.4 °C [170]. | |||
European cities: urban heat island (UHI) effect | Urban trees cool European cities by an average of 1.1 °C and up to 2.9 °C [171]. | |||
Global urban climate change mitigation | Global urban trees store approximately 7.4 billion tons of carbon and sequester approximately 217 million tons of carbon (796 million CO2e/year annually [172]. | |||
Carbon sequestration (tree planting) | Trees absorb CO2 through photosynthesis | Sequester 217 M tons CO2/year globally | Malaysia | 100 million trees: capable of absorbing 22 kg of CO2 per year, contributing to local and regional warming mitigations [173,174]. |
China | Planted 142.6 billion trees: substantial increase in carbon storage (873.1 ± 16.2 Tg C in planted forests (1.87 billion tons ± 16 million tons), contributing to mitigating local, regional and global warming [175,176,177]. | |||
Biodiversity revival in cities | ||||
Nest boxes | Installed in trees for breeding birds | Singapore | Hornbill population recovery [178]. | |
Nature corridors | Native plant routes connecting forest fragments | Singapore | Pumas, golden tamarins recolonized urban edges [178]. | |
River cleanup | Pollution control and habitat restoration | Singapore | Smooth-coated otters returned to urban waterways [178]. | |
Wetland conservation | 400 ha network at Sungei Buloh Reserve | Singapore | Hosts >50% of Singapore’s bird species [179]. | |
Global urban cooling technologies | ||||
Complementary green infrastructure | Green roofs | Insulates buildings, reduces runoff | Basel, Switzerland (green roofs through financial incentives and legal mandates | 3–7 °C surface cooling [180]. |
Cairo city | 0.5 °C to 6 °C reduction in air temperature on rooftops [181]. | |||
Chongqing, Tokyo, and Hangzhou | Reduces pedestrian temperatures by 0.5 °C, 0.1 °C, and 0.5 °C, respectively [181]. | |||
Beijing | Reduces the daytime average air temperature by a maximum of 0.41 °C [181]. | |||
Cool pavements | Light-colored, high-albedo materials for multi-layer pavements or a combination of high-albedo and permeable or reflective pavements | Urban climate research | Reduces surface temps by 5–20 °C [182,183,184]. | |
Cool pavement paired with trees for shade synergy | City of Phoenix cool corridor | 5.4 °C cooler under trees and 4.4 °C cooler within building canyons compared to open areas [185,186,187]. | ||
City of Tokyo | Cool pavements reduce road temperatures by up to 10 °C [185,186,187]. | |||
Cool pavement paired with tree canopy | Urban microclimate simulation (Hangzhou, China) | Boosts cooling effects to 10–15 °C [188]. | ||
Cool pavement paired with canopy | Urban climate adaptation strategy (Madison, Wisconsin) | Canopy cover exceeded 40%: greatest cooling [189]. |
Multi-Scalar Nature-Based Regenerative Solutions (M-NbRSs)—Earth System-Based | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Solution | Mechanism | Case Study | Outcome | |
Biosphere: biodiversity and habitat restoration | ||||
Deforestation/habitat fragmentation and biodiversity conservation | Reforestation | Reconnects fragmented habitats, reduces edge effects. | Reserva Biológica União, Brazil (250 m × 1000 m corridor) | Pumas and golden lion tamarins returned within 5 years [190]. |
Wildlife corridors | Enable species migration and genetic exchange. | Yellowstone-to-Yukon (3200 km) | Grizzly bear populations increased by 50% since 1997 [190]. | |
Kavango–Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area (5 countries) | Enhanced elephant migration routes [190]. | |||
Biodiversity conservation | Wildlife habitat protection/species extinction | Indonesia’s Katingan Mentaya Project (protecting and restoring 149,800 ha peat swamp forests) | Offer protection for the critically endangered Bornean orangutan the endangered proboscis monkey and the endangered Bornean white-bearded gibbon [191,192]. | |
Transboundary ecological conservation | Creation of a 24 million ha totally protected area (the Heart of Borno) for sustainable biodiversity management | Indonesia–Malaysia–Brunei Heart of Borneo initiative | Conserve the ecological integrity of HoB transboundary wildlife connectivity corridors to protect various endangered species such as Bornean orangutans and proboscis monkeys [193]. | |
Mining impact mitigation | On-site restoration | Microhabitat creation (hollow logs, soil microbiome revival) | Lusatian Lakes, Germany (flooded lignite mines) | More than 1000 aquatic species returned; new canals support fish populations [194]. |
Indigenous co-management | Impact–benefit agreements (IBAs) with traditional ecological knowledge | Impact–benefit agreements (IBAs) with traditional ecological knowledge | Diamond mines northeast of Yellowknife, Canada | Improved environmental monitoring and wealth-sharing with First Nations [195,196,197]. |
Tropical rainforest conservation integrating Indigenous wisdom | Application of Indigenous environmental knowledge (IEK) and traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) developed over millennia | Heart of Borneo Initiative (transboundary conservation across Indonesia, Malaysia, and Brunei) | Maintenance of ecological integrity across 24 million hectares of forest ecosystems [193]. | |
Lithosphere: soil and land degradation | ||||
Mining rehabilitation | Soil microbiome restoration | Reintroduces native microbes for nutrient cycling | Western Australia (Jarrah Forest, Swan Coastal Plain, Pilbara) | Higher organic matter decomposition and soil moisture retention [198]. |
Constructed wetlands | Removes heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Fe, Ni, Cr, Cu) via phytoremediation | Gadoon Amazai Industrial Estate, Pakistan | Heavy metal reductions: Pb (50%), Cd (91.9%), Fe (74.1%), and Ni (40.9%) [199]. | |
Sustainable land management | Conservation tillage | Disturbs soil minimally to retain moisture and organic matter | West of Lake Balaton in southwest Hungary | Conservation tillage decreased surface runoffs by 75% and soil loss by 95% [200]. |
Diversified crop rotation | Breaks pest cycles and enhances soil fertility | North China Plain | Reduced N2O emissions by 39%, improved system’s GHG balance by 88%, stimulated soil microbial activities by including legumes in crop rotations, increased soil organic carbon stocks by 8%, and enhanced soil health [201]. | |
Organic farming | Eliminates synthetic inputs to improve soil health | IFOAM Organics Europe case study | (a) Can reduce global agricultural GHG emissions by around 20%, (b) can reduce nitrous oxide and methane emissions from manure by 50% and 70%, respectively, (c) consumes around 15% less energy per unit produced compared to conventional agriculture, (d) supports rare insects and spiders, increasing their abundance by 55% and their diversity by 27% compared to conventional farming, (e) reduces soil erosion and soil loss by 22% and 26%, respectively, and (f) improves soil quality and fertility, contributing significantly to higher soil organic carbon sequestration [202]. | |
Hydrosphere: water systems | ||||
Coastal and freshwater restoration | Mangrove restoration | Coastal protection and carbon sequestration | Indonesia peatland | The restoration of 2.3 million ha of targeted peatland ecosystems: estimated to reduce carbon emissions by 98.77–153.53 MtCO2e [203]. |
Indonesia mangrove restoration | Mangrove swamp restoration in the coastal villages (Sriwulan, Bedono, Timbulsloko, and Surodadi) in Central Java: supports a higher macrobenthic faunal diversity and reduces wave action in highly eroded areas [204]. | |||
Coral reef restoration | Transplanting heat-resistant corals to mitigate bleaching | Great Barrier Reef, Australia | Promotes faster recovery from chemical bleaching, enhances coral’s heat tolerance, and reduces sea surface temperature rise/ocean warning [205]. | |
Floodplain management | Sustainable floodplain management | Reduces flooding and improves water quality | European case study | Increases natural water retention in flood pian areas, reduces flood risks, and improves water quality, carbon sequestration, habitat, and biodiversity protection [206]. |
Ocean acidification and ocean warming mitigation | GHG/CO2 removal | Mobilizing actions to limit global GHG emissions, which is critical to reducing global warming, influencing ocean heat absorption, ocean warming, and decreases in the ocean’s pH | China’s climate pledge | China reduced its CO2 emissions per unit of GDP (emissions intensity) by 48.4% in 2020 compared to the 2005 level and increased its share of non-fossil fuel in primary energy consumption to 15.9% in the same year. Coal-fired power plants declined by nearly 80% in the first half of 2021, compared to the same period in 2020 [207]. |
Coastal erosion management | Coastal protection and conservation (to protect the hydrosphere by maintaining coastal ecosystem’s health, regulate water quality, and prevent flooding) | Nearshore nourishment | Klaipėda Port (Baltic Sea) | Nearshore nourishment has successfully stabilized the subaerial coast with 21.1% of the nourished sand accumulating offshore and about 69.4% of the nourished sand remaining at the nourishment site [208]. |
Managing coastal water and marine resource sustainability | Tackling overfishing and ocean climate impacts in Britain, Portugal, Greece, Turkey, Mexico, the Philippines, and Indonesia | Building marine protected areas and reviving marine life | Assists local communities in establishing “marine protected areas” in coastal waters. This will contribute to protecting at least 30% of the world’s oceans by the end of the decade | Assists local communities in establishing “marine protected areas” in coastal waters. This will contribute to the protection of at least 30% of the world’s oceans by the end of the decade [209,210]. |
Atmosphere: climate regulation | ||||
Carbon sequestration | Peatland preservation | Rewetting and conserving tropical peatlands, preventing CO2 release (stores 105 GtC globally) | Congo Basin (29 GtC) and Indonesia (55–57 GtC) | Avoids 1.9 GtCO2 emissions annually [211,212,213]. |
Forest conservation | Protects old-growth forests (stores 170.7 GtC in biomass, 49.3 GtC in soils) | Global tropical forests | Captures 226 GtC (1/3 of industrial-era emissions) [214,215]. | |
Cryosphere: glacier, ice, and permafrost | ||||
Albedo and methane management to enhance negative feedback to global warming | Permafrost insulation | Rewilding permafrost to insulate the soil from temperature rise/fluctuations | Endalen and Adventdalen, located in the vicinity of Longyearbyen, Svalbard | High Arctic mosses and vascular vegetation slow active layer permafrost thaw, shading incoming sunlight and creating an insulating layer [216,217,218,219]. |
Safeguarding and prolonging the lifetime of glaciers | Anthropogenic CO2 emissions reduction | Reducing human-induced warming/decoupling of economic growth from GHG emissions | Copenhagen’s transition to a bicycle-friendly city | 42% CO2 reduction compared to 2005 levels [220]. |
Costa Rica’s transition to renewable energy | 98% of electricity from renewable sources [221]. | |||
Ørsted renewable energy transition and circular economy, with installed renewable capacity increased by 16% to 18.2 GW in 2024. | (i) About 80% reduction in coal consumption since 2006; (ii) 83% carbon emissions reduction since 2006 [222,223]. |
8.2. Operationalizing Earth System Regeneration: Evidence from Multi-Scalar Solutions (Table 5 and Table 6)
8.3. Translating M-NbRS into Governance
- Supply chain due diligence for deforestation-free procurement, linking municipal financing to ecological performance targets through sustainability-linked bonds;
- Economic instruments must be redesigned to incentivize circularity, including tax rebates for industries achieving high material recovery rates and the integration of biophysical indicators alongside traditional economic metrics;
- Ecological reciprocity mandates (requiring cities to fund transboundary conservation efforts using metropolitan taxes).
9. Conclusions
- Street trees (local) are incentivized via carbon markets tied to global ice-loss thresholds (Section 7.2);
- Supply chain laws (global) protect forests that cool cities (regional), as demonstrated in Table 6.
- Legally mandate multi-scalar NbRSs
- Local tier: Enact and enforce zoning laws requiring 30% urban green cover, which is projected to reduce temperatures by 0.4 °C and cool infrastructure such as green roofs and permeable pavements in all cities by 2040, modeled on Basel’s binding mandates. Link infrastructure funding to biophysical metrics. For example, cities that achieve ≥30% tree canopy cover or proven reductions in urban heat island intensity from tree canopy/green roofs qualify for additional funding.
- Regional tier: Establish transboundary “ecological reciprocity,” requiring cities to fund hinterland watershed protection.
- Global tier: Ratify a treaty to protect 30% of oceans and critical carbon sinks such as peatlands and mangroves by 2030, funded by reallocating USD 540 billion/year in fossil fuel subsidies.
- Enforce supply chain accountability
- »
- Adopt EU-style extraterritorial regulations to penalize corporations sourcing from deforested lands or violating biosphere integrity boundaries.
- Institutionalize indigenous wisdom of environmental conservation
- »
- Formalize Indigenous wisdom, that is, Indigenous environmental knowledge and traditional ecological knowledge (TEK), in co-management of biodiversity corridors such as the Canadian impact–benefit agreements and scale-up models like the Heart of Borneo Initiative to protect 24 million hectares of ecosystem diversity across three nations (Indonesia, Malaysia, and Brunei).
- Implementation pathways for biophysical metrics integration
- »
- »
- »
- Biodiversity recovery: species revival metrics, for example, Singapore’s otter/hornbill populations [178].
- Legally enforce “Rights of Nature” frameworks
- »
- Basel’s green roofs: legally required cooling infrastructure (reduces surface temperature by 3–7 °C);
- »
- Singapore’s ecological reciprocity: binding urban–hinterland conservation such as watershed protection.
- Policy-linked fiscal instrument
- »
- Electric mobility law (Law 9518/2018): tax exemptions tied to EV adoption rates and charging infrastructure rollout as in Costa Rica;
- »
- Singapore’s biodiversity impact offset: require mitigation for approved development projects through habitat restoration [179].
9.1. Scientific Limitations and Critical Research Frontier
- Problem: a 40 to 60 year lag between urban GHG emissions and cryosphere responses, for example, ice sheet collapse or permafrost thaw, means current climate models underestimate committed warming by 0.5–1.2 °C.
- Implication: urban decarbonization targets, for example, net-zero by 2050, may fail to prevent locked-in sea-level rise and methane releases.
- Research imperative: develop next-generation Earth system models that integrate delayed cryosphere feedback into urban climate adaptation frameworks.
9.2. Pathways for Real-World Implementation
9.3. Concluding Remarks
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- UN-Habitat. Energy and Resource Efficient Urban Neighbourhood Design Principles for Tropical Countries. In A Practitioner’s Guidebook; United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat): Nairobi, Kenya, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Circular Economy Foundation. Circularity Gap Report 2023; Circular Economy Foundation: Brussels, Belgium, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Luqman, M.; Rayner, P.J.; Gurney, K.R. On the impact of urbanisation on CO2 emissions. npj Urban Sustain. 2023, 3, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukim, M.; Roberts, M. (Eds.) Thriving: Making Cities Green, Resilient, and Inclusive in a Changing Climate; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weisse, M.; Goldman, E.; Carter, S. Forest Pulse: The Latest on the World’s Forests; World Resource Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2024; Available online: https://gfr.wri.org/latest-analysis-deforestation-trends (accessed on 5 April 2025).
- Global Forest Watch. Forest Monitoring Designed for Action; Washington, DC, USA, 2025; Available online: https://www.globalforestwatch.org/ (accessed on 5 April 2025).
- EEA. How Climate Change Impacts Marine Life; European Environmental Agency (EEA): Copenhagen, Denmark, 2023; Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/how-climate-change-impacts (accessed on 8 April 2025).
- Ayres, R.U. Industrial metabolism: Theory and policy. In The Greening of Industrial Ecosystems; Allenby, B.R., Richards, D.J., Eds.; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1994; pp. 23–37. [Google Scholar]
- Wernick, I.K. Industrial Metabolism. In International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences; Smelser, N.J., Paul, B., Baltes, P.B., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 2001; pp. 7331–7333. [Google Scholar]
- Martín-Gómez, A.M.; Ávila-Gutiérrez, M.J.; Lama-Ruiz, J.R.; Aguayo-González, F. Industrial metabolism: A multilevel characterization for designing sustainable manufacturing systems. Machines 2024, 12, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Young, J.T. Is the entropy law relevant to the economics of natural resource scarcity? J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1991, 21, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderberg, S. Industrial metabolism and the linkages between economics, ethics and the environment. Ecol. Econ. 1998, 24, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zanjani, N.E.; Salem, Y.; Qadi, S.; Hammoud, S. The study of urban metabolism and its role in urban planning. Int. J. Urban Manag. Energy Sustain. 2021, 2, 27–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galán-Cano, L.; Mena-Nieto, A.; Cámara-Aceituno, J.; Hermoso-Orzáez, M.J.; Terrados-Cepeda, J. Urban metabolism, sustainability and energy transition in cities: A comprehensive review. Results Eng. 2025, 25, 104278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Georgescu-Roegen, N. Energy and economic myths. South. Econ. J. 1975, 41, 347–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Georgescu-Roegen, N. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; London, UK, 1976; Volume 1408, p. 49. [Google Scholar]
- Swendse, R.H. Probability, Entropy, and Gibbs’ Paradox(es). Entropy 2018, 20, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richardson, K.; Steffen, W.; Lucht, W.; Bendtsen, J.; Cornell, S.E.; Donges, J.F.; Drüke, M.; Fetzer, I.; Bala, G.; von Bloh, W.; et al. Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Foster, A.; Lenz, E.A.; Kessler, J.D.; Stroeve, J.C.; Anderson, L.O.; Turetsky, M.; Betts, R.; Zou, S.J.; Liu, W.; et al. Mechanisms and impacts of Earth system tipping elements. Rev. Geophys. 2023, 61, e2021RG000757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.; Chen, D.; Yang, L.; Meng, J.; Wang, Z.C.; Ludescher, J.; Fan, J.F.; Yang, S.I.; Chen, D.L.; Kurths, J.; et al. Teleconnections among tipping elements in the Earth system. Nat. Clim. Change 2023, 13, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steffen, W.; Richardson, K.; Rockström, J.; Cornell, S.E.; Fetzer, I.; Bennett, E.M.; Biggs, R.; Carpenter, S.R.; de Vries, W.; de Wit, C.A.; et al. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 2015, 347, 6223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Friant, M.C.; Reid, K.; Boesler, P.; Vermeulen, W.J.V.; Salomone, R. Analyzing urban circular economy policies in Amsterdam, Glasgow, and Copenhagen. Local. Environ. 2023, 28, 1331–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ragazou, K.; Zournatzidou, G.; Sklavos, G.; Sariannidis, S. Integration of Circular Economy and Urban Metabolism for a Resilient Waste-Based Sustainable Urban Environment. Urban Sci. 2024, 8, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cialani, C.; Mortazavi, R.; Sarcinella, F. Material Footprint and Circular Economy for a Sustainable Consumption and Production Pattern. Circ. Econ. Sustain. 2025, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Bank. A Catalogue of Nature-Based Solutions for Urban Resilience; World Bank Group: Washington, DC, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Chowdhury, K.; Basu, S.; Pramanik, M.; Plieninger, T. Blue infrastructure as nature-based solutions for urban sustainability: Evaluating local perceptions from four Indian megacities. Nat.-Based Solut. 2025, 7, 100211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McPhearson, T.; Cook, E.M.; Berbés-Blázquez, M.; Cheng, C.W.; Grimm, N.B.; Andersson, A.; Barbosa, O.; Chandler, D.G.; Chang, H.J.; Chester, M.V.; et al. A social-ecological-technological systems framework for urban ecosystem services. One Earth 2022, 5, 505–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crippa, M.; Guizzardi, D.; Pagani, F.; Banja, M.; Muntean, M.; Schaaf, E.; Monforti-Ferrario, F.; Becker, W.E.; Quadrelli, R.; Martin, R.; et al. GHG Emissions of All World Countries—JRC/IEA; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2024; JRC138862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Energy Institute. Statistical Review of World Energy 2024; Energy Institute: London, UK, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Giljum, S.; Maus, V.; Kuschnig, N.; Luckeneder, S.; Tost, M.; Sonter, L.J.; Bebbington, A.J. A pantropical assessment of deforestation caused by industrial mining. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2118273119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lan, X.; Keeling, R. Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide (CO2); U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2025. Available online: https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/ (accessed on 10 April 2025).
- NASA. Ocean Warming; The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): Washington, DC, USA, 2024. Available online: https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/ocean-warming/?intent=121 (accessed on 10 April 2025).
- Slater, T.; Lawrence, I.R.; Otosaka, I.N.; Shepherd, A.; Gourmelen, N.; Jakob, L.; Tepes, P.; Gilbert, L.; Nienow, P. Review article: Earth’s ice imbalance. Cryosphere 2021, 15, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harvey, C. Earth Has Lost 28 Trillion Tons of Ice Since the Mid-1990s. Scientific American. 2021. Available online: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/earth-has-lost-28-trillion-tons-of-ice-since-the-mid-1990s (accessed on 10 April 2025).
- IPBES. Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services; International Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES): Bonn, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Cabernard, L.; Pfister, S.; Hellweg, S. Biodiversity impacts of recent land-use change driven by increases in agri-food imports. Nat. Sustain. 2024, 7, 1512–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ford, D.N. A system dynamics glossary. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 2019, 35, 369–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Checkland, P. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Fischer, P.; Sembritzki, K.; Maier, A. System Theory. In Medical Imaging Systems. An Introductory Guide; Maier, A., Steidl, S., Christlein, V., Hornegger, J., Eds.; Spinger Open: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 13–36. [Google Scholar]
- Lawrencea, J.; Blackettb, P.; Cradock-Henry, N.A. Cascading climate change impacts and implications. Clim. Risk Manag. 2020, 29, 100234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schulz, K.G.; Bach, L.T.; Bellerby, R.G.J.; Bermúdez, R.; Büdenbender, J.; Boxhammer, T.; Czerny, J.; Engel, A.; Ludwig, A.; Meyerhöfer, M.; et al. Phytoplankton Blooms at Increasing Levels of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide: Experimental Evidence for Negative Effects on Prymnesiophytes and Positive on Small Picoeukaryotes. Front. Mar. Sci. 2017, 4, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gowdy, J.; Susan Mesner, S. The Evolution of Georgescu-Roegen’s Bioeconomics. Rev. Soc. Econ. 1998, 56, 136–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Talwar, P.; Verma, N.; Khatri, H.; Ahire, P.D.; Chaudhary, G.; Lindenberger, C.; Vivekanand, V. A systematic review of photovoltaic-green roof systems in different climatic conditions focusing on sustainable cities and societies. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 98, 104813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Persson, L.; Carney Almroth, B.M.; Collins, C.D.; Cornell, S.; de Wit, C.A.; Diamond, M.L.; Fantke, P.; Hassellöv, M.; MacLeod, M.; Ryberg, M.W.; et al. Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 1510–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Briffa, J.; Sinagra, E.; Blundell, R. Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nyiramigisha, P.; Komariah; Sajidan. Harmful Impacts of Heavy Metal Contamination in the Soil and Crops Grown Around Dumpsites. Rev. Agric. Sci. 2021, 9, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Sharkawy, M.; Alotaibi, M.O.; Li, J.; Du, D.; Mahmoud, E. Heavy Metal Pollution in Coastal Environments: Ecological Implications and Management Strategies: A Review. Sustainability 2025, 17, 701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choy, Y.K.; Onuma, A.; Lee, K.E. The Nexus of Industrial–Urban Sustainability, the Circular Economy, and Climate–Ecosystem Resilience: A Synthesis. Sustainability 2025, 17, 2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joyce, S. The dead zones: Oxygen-starved coastal waters. Env. Health Perspect. 2000, 108, A120–A125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Evich, M.G.; Davis, M.J.B.; McCord, J.P.; Acrey, B.; Awkerman, J.A.; Knappe, D.R.U.; Lindstrom, A.; Speth, T.F.; Tebes-Stevens, C.; Strynar, M.J.; et al. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment. Science 2022, 375, 6580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haba, B.; Djellali, S.; Abdelouahed, Y.; Boudjelida, S.; Faleschini, F.; Carraro, M. Transforming Plastic Waste into Value: A Review of Management Strategies and Innovative Applications in Sustainable Construction. Polymers 2025, 17, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steffen, W.; Richardson, K.; Rockström, J.; Schellnhuber, H.J.; Dube, O.P.; Dutreuil, S.M.; Lenton, T.M.; Lubchenco, J. The emergence and evolution of Earth System Science. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2020, 1, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baatz, R.; Hendricks Franssen, H.J.; Euskirchen, E.; Sihi, D.; Dietze, M.; Ciavatta, S.; Fennel, K.; Beck, H.; Lannoy, G.D. Reanalysis in Earth system science: Toward terrestrial ecosystem reanalysis. Rev. Geophys. 2021, 59, e2020RG000715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rumjaun, A.B.; Borde, B.; Guilyardi, E.; Lescarmontier, L.; Matthews, R.; Niewöhner, C.; Pen Point, S.; Schlüpmann, J.; Wilgenbus, D. IPCC Special Report. Global Warming of 1.5 °C—Summary for Teacher; Office for Climate Education (OCE): Paris, France, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Ritchie, H. What Is the Ozone Layer, and Why is it Important? OurWorldinData.org. 2023. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/ozone-layer-context (accessed on 29 March 2025).
- Friedlingstein, P.; O’Sullivan, M.; Jones, M.W.; Andrew, R.M.; Gregor, L.; Hauck, J.; Le Quéré, C.; Luijkx, I.T.; Olsen, A.; Peters, G.P.; et al. Global Carbon Budget 2022. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2022, 14, 4811–4900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farquhar, G.D.; Fasham, M.J.R.; Goulden, M.L.; Heimann, M.; Jaramillo, V.J.; Kheshgi, H.S.; Le Quéré, C.; Scholes, R.J.; Wallace, D.W.R.; Prentice, I.C.; et al. The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. In Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC); Houghton, J.T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D.J., Noguer, M., Linden, P.J.V.D., Dai, X., Maskell, K., Johnson, C.A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2001; pp. 183–237. [Google Scholar]
- Bollmann, M.; Bosch, T.; Colijn, F.; Ebinghaus, R.; Froese, R.; Güssow, K.; Khalilian, S.; Krastel, S.; Körtzinger, A.; Langenbuch, M.; et al. Living with the Oceans. A Report on the State of the World’s Oceans; World Ocean Review; Mare: Hamburg, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Bopp, L.; Bowler, C.; Guidi, L.; Karsenti, E.; de Varga, C. The Ocean: A Carbon Pump. In Ocean and Climate, Scientific Notes; 2015; pp. 13–18. Available online: www.ocean-climate.org (accessed on 30 March 2025).
- Wu, Y.X.; Hain, M.P.; Humphreys, M.P.; Hartman, S.; Toby Tyrrell, T. What drives the latitudinal gradient in open-ocean surface dissolved inorganic carbon concentration? Biogeosciences 2019, 16, 2661–2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansell, D.A.; Carlson, C.A.; Repeta, D.J.; Schlitzer, R. Dissolved organic matter in the ocean: A controversy stimulates new insights. Oceanography 2009, 22, 202–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindsey, R.; Scott, M. What are Phytoplankton? The Earth Observatory, EOS Project Science Office, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center: Glenn Dale, MD, USA, 2010. Available online: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/Phytoplankton (accessed on 30 March 2025).
- Bressac, M.; Laurenceau-Cornec, E.C.; Kennedy, F.; Santoro, A.E.; Paul, N.L.; Briggs, N.; Carvalho, F.; Boyd, P.W. Decoding drivers of carbon flux attenuation in the oceanic biological pump. Nature 2024, 633, 587–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamaguchi, R.; Kouketsu, S.; Kosugi, N.; Ishii, M. Global upper ocean dissolved oxygen budget for constraining the biological carbon pump. Commun. Earth Environ. 2024, 5, 732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blümel, M.; Fisch, K.; Franke, D.; Frey, T.; Froese, R.; Greinert, J.; Gutow, L.; Gutt, J.; Hain, S.; Haroon, A. The Ocean, Guarantor of Life—Sustainable Use, Effective Protection; World Ocean Review; Mare: Hamburg, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Miner, K.R.; Turetsky, M.R.; Malina, E.; Bartsch, A.; Tamminen, J.; McGuire, A.D.; Fix, A.; Sweeney, C.; Elder, C.D.; Miller, C.E. Permafrost carbon emissions in a changing Arctic. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2022, 3, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- NOAA. Trends in CO2, CH4, N2O, SF6; Global Monitoring Laboratory, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA): Washington, DC, USA, 2025. Available online: https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/ (accessed on 30 March 2025).
- Flanagan, E. The Global Carbon Budget and Permafrost Feedback Loops in the Arctic; The Arctic Institute: Oslo, Norway, 2021; Available online: https://www.thearcticinstitute.org/global-carbon-budget-permafrost-feedback-loops-arctic/ (accessed on 30 March 2025).
- CIS. Energy: The Driver of Climate. Climate Science Investigation (CIS); National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): Washington, DC, USA, 2023. Available online: https://www.ces.fau.edu/nasa/module-2/earth-energy-balance.php (accessed on 1 April 2025).
- Serreze, M. Why Is the Arctic So Sensitive to Climate Change and Why Do We Care? NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA): Newport, OR, USA. Available online: https://www.pmel.noaa.gov/arctic-zone/essay_serreze.html (accessed on 1 April 2025).
- National Ocean Service. What Is the Cryosphere? Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA): Washington, DC, USA, 2024. Available online: https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/cryosphere.html#:~:text=The%20components%20of%20the%20cryosphere,to%20regulate%20our%20planet’s%20temperature (accessed on 1 April 2025).
- Bitz, C.M.; Gent, P.R.; Woodgate, R.A.; Holland, M.M.; Lindsay, R. The Influence of Sea Ice on Ocean Heat Uptake in Response to Increasing CO2. J. Clim. 2006, 19, 2437–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Josey, S.A.; Meijers, A.J.S.; Blaker, A.T.P.; Grist, J.P.; Mecking, J.; Ayres, H.C. Record-low Antarctic Sea ice in 2023 increased ocean heat loss and storms. Nature 2024, 636, 635–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- NASA. Thawing Permafrost Could Leach Microbes, Chemicals into Environment; Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): Washington, DC, USA, 2022. Available online: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/thawing-permafrost-could-leach-microbes-chemicals-into-environment/ (accessed on 1 April 2025).
- Kim, D.K.; Kim, M.C.; Woo, S.H.; Nam, S.J.; Myeong, N.R.; Kim, E.B.; Lee, Y.M. Potential risks of bacterial plant pathogens from thawing permafrost in the Alaskan tundra. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 289, 117531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruben, M.; Marchant, H.; Wietz, M.; Gentz, T.; Strauss, J.; Koch, B.P.; Mollenhauer, G. Microbial communities degrade ancient permafrost-derived organic matter in Arctic seawater. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2024, 129, e2023JG007936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riebeek, H. The Carbon Cycle; The Earth Observatory, EOS Project Science Office, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center: Glenn Dale, MD, USA, 2011. Available online: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/CarbonCycle (accessed on 1 April 2025).
- Kevin Boyce, C.; Ibarra, D.E.; Antonio, M.P.D. What we talk about when we talk about the long-term carbon cycle. New Phytol. 2023, 237, 1550–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brantley, S.L.; Shaughnessy, A.; Lebedeva, L.; Balashov, V.N. How temperature-dependent silicate weathering acts as Earth’s geological thermostat. Science 2023, 379, 382–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Earth Observatory. The Slow Carbon Cycle; EOS Project Science Office, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): Washington, DC, USA, 2011. Available online: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/CarbonCycle/page2.php (accessed on 1 April 2025).
- Dias Rodrigues, C.I.; Brito, L.M.; Nunes, L.J.R. Soil Carbon Sequestration in the Context of Climate Change Mitigation: A Review. Soil Syst. 2023, 7, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srivastava, R.K.; Yetgin, A. An overall review on influence of root architecture on soil carbon sequestration potential. Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 2024, 36, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Royle, S. Ancient carbon released. Nat. Clim. Change 2024, 14, 896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Callahan, C.W.; Mankin, J.S. Carbon majors and the scientific case for climate liability. Nature 2025, 640, 893–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hatab, A.A.; Bustamante, M.; Clark, H.; Havlík, P.; House, J.; Mbow, C.; Ninan, K.N.; Popp, A.; Roe, S.; Sohngen, B.; et al. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Uses 1 (AFOLU), in AR6 Synthesis Report. Climate Change 2023; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Secretariat of the Convention on Wetlands. Restoring Drained Peatlands: A Necessary Step to Achieve Global Climate Goals; Ramsar Policy Brief; The Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar Convention): Gland, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Chandra, D.; Chatterton, P.; Chico, G.; Duhigg, G.; Gibson, K.; Hart, S.; Hickson, E.; Hill, M.; Kerkvliet-Hermans, R.; Kopansky, D. Investing in Peatlands; Climate Catalyst: London, UK; Landscape Finance Lab: Wien, Austria; Water Land: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Dargie, G.C.; Lewis, S.L.; Lawson, I.T.; Mitchard, E.T.A.; Page, S.E.; Bocko, Y.E.; Ifo, S.A. Age, extent and carbon storage of the central Congo Basin peatland complex. Nature 2017, 542, 86–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- FAO. The State of the World’s Forests 2022. In Forest Pathways for Green Recovery and Building Inclusive, Resilient and Sustainable Economies; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Italy, Rome, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Streiff, L. NASA Satellites Help Quantify Forests’ Impacts on Global Carbon Budget; National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): Washington, DC, USA, 2021. Available online: https://www.nasa.gov/science-research/earth-science/nasa-satellites-help-quantify-forests-impacts-on-global-carbon-budget/ (accessed on 1 April 2025).
- UNDP. Forests Can Help Us Limit Climate Change—Here Is How; United Nations Development Programme (UNDP): New York, NY, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Nancy, L.; Harris, N.L.; Gibbs, D.A.; Baccini, A.; Birdsey, R.A.; de Bruin, S.; Farina, M.; Fatoyinbo, L.; Hansen, M.C.; Herold, M.; et al. Global Maps Twenty-First Century For. Carbon fluxes. Nat. Clim. Change 2021, 11, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UN-ECA. Mapping Carbon and Forest Certification, and Related Economic Benefits to Investors in the Transition to Net Zero: Examples from the Countries Participating in the Congo Basin Blue Fund; United Nations, Economic Commission for Africa: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2024; Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/10855/50096 (accessed on 1 April 2025).
- Gachet, B.; Naranjo, L.G.; Román, L.; Surkin, J.; Tamayo, V. Living Amazon Report 2022; World Wildlife Fund for Nature (WWF): Quito, Ecuador, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Skrzypczak, D.; Gorazda, K.; Mikula, K.; Mironiuk, M.; Kominko, H.; Sawska, K.; Evrard, D.; Trzaska, K.; Moustakas, K.; Chojnack, K. Towards carbon neutrality: Enhancing CO2 sequestration by plants to reduce carbon footprint. Sci. Total Environ. 2025, 966, 178763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, A.A.Q.; Odelade, K.A.; Babalola, O.O. Microbial Inoculants for Improving Carbon Sequestration in Agroecosystems to Mitigate Climate Change. In Handbook of Climate Change Resilience; Leal Filho, W., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
- Hannula, S.E.; Morriën, E. Will fungi solve the carbon dilemma? Geoderma 2022, 413, 115767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UN-Habitat. World Cities Report 2022; United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat): Nairobi, Kenya, 2022; Available online: https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2022/06/wcr_2022.pdf (accessed on 20 April 2025).
- World Bank. Urban Development; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2023; Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/overview (accessed on 20 April 2025).
- Lindsey, R. Climate Change: Global Sea Level. In Science and Information for a Climate-Smart Nation; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA: Washington, DC, USA, 2022. Available online: https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-global-sea-level (accessed on 13 April 2025).
- Laffoley, D.; Baxter, J.M. (Eds.) Ocean Deoxygenation: Everyone’s Problem—Causes, Impacts, Consequences and Solutions; Full report; IUCN: Gland, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Evison, W.; Low, L.P.; O’Brie, D. Managing Nature Risks: From Understanding to Action; PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC): Aberdeen, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Whieldon, E.; Yap, S.; Raikwar, L.; Desme, G. How the World’s Largest Companies Depend on Nature and Biodiversity; S&P Global Sustainable: New York, NY, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Hickel, J. High-Income Countries Are Responsible for 74 Percent of Excess Resource Use Causing Ecological Breakdown; London School of Economics and Political Science: London, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Circular Economy Foundation. Circularity Gap Report 2020; Circular Economy Foundation: Brussels, Belgium, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- OECD. Global Material Resources Outlook to 2060: Economic Drivers and Environmental Consequences; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dsilva, J.; Zarmukhambetova, S.; Locke, J. Assessment of building materials in the construction sector: A case study using life cycle assessment approach to achieve the circular economy. Heliyon 2023, 9, e20404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sameer, H.; Bringezu, S. Life cycle input indicators of material resource use for enhancing sustainability assessment schemes of buildings. J. Build. Eng. 2019, 21, 230–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunziker, R.; Schweizer, C. Transforming the Built Environment; World Business Council for Sustainable Development: Geneva, Switzerland, 2025; Available online: https://www.wbcsd.org/actions/transforming-the-built-environment/ (accessed on 15 April 2025).
- World Green Building Council. Bringing Embodied Carbon Upfront; World Green Building Council: London, UK, 2025; Available online: https://worldgbc.org/climate-action/embodied-carbon/ (accessed on 2 April 2025).
- Rondinel-Oviedo, D.R.; Naomi Keena, N. Embodied Carbon: A call to the building industry 2022. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022, 1122, 012042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reichl, C.; Schatz, M. World Mining Data 2022; Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Regions and Tourism: Vienna, Austria, 2022; Volume 37.
- Potapov, P.; Turubanova, S.; Hansen, M.C.; Tyukavina, A.; Zalles, V.; Khan, A.; Song, X.P.; Pickens, A.; Shen, Q.; Cortez, J. Global maps of cropland extent and change show accelerated cropland expansion in the twenty-first century. Nat. Food 2022, 3, 19–28. [Google Scholar]
- Global Footprint Network. Earth Overshoot Day 2024 Approaching; Global Footprint Network: Oakland, CA, USA, 2024. Available online: https://www.footprintnetwork.org/2024/07/21/earth_overshoot_day_2024/ (accessed on 3 April 2025).
- The World Counts. Tonnes of CO2 Emitted into the Atmosphere. The World Count. 2025. Available online: https://www.theworldcounts.com/challenges/global-warming/global-co2-emissions (accessed on 3 April 2025).
- Hansen, J.; Kharecha, P.; Sato, M.; Masson-Delmotte, V.; Ackerman, F.; Beerling, D.J.; Hearty, P.J.; Hoegh-Guldberg, O.; Hsu, S.-L.; Parmesan, C. Assessing ‘‘Dangerous Climate Change’’: Required Reduction of Carbon Emissions to Protect Young People, Future Generations and Nature. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e81648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Global Carbon Budget. Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions Increase Again in 2024; Global Carbon Project; University of Exeter’s Global Systems Institute: Exeter, UK, 2024; Available online: https://globalcarbonbudget.org/fossil-fuel-co2-emissions-increase-again-in-2024/ (accessed on 16 April 2025).
- Tiseo, I. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Worldwide: Statistics and Facts: Statista. 2025. Available online: https://www.statista.com/topics/5770/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions/#topicOverview (accessed on 16 April 2025).
- World Bank. Making Mining Forest-Smart Executive Summary Report of the World Bank; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Young, R.E.; Gann, G.D.; Walder, B.; Liu, J.G.; Cui, W.H.; Newton, V.; Nelson, C.R.; Tashe, N.; Jasper, D.; Silveira, F.A.O.; et al. International principles and standards for the ecological restoration and recovery of mine sites. Restor. Ecol. 2022, 30, e13771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kramer, M.; Kind-Rieper, T.; Munayer, R.; Giljum, S.; Masselink, R.; Ackern, P.-V.; Maus, V.; Sebastian Luckeneder, S.; Kuschnig, N.; Felipe Costa, F.; et al. Extracted Forests: Unearthing the Role of Mining-Related Deforestation as a Driver of Global Deforestation; WWF Deutschland: Berlin, Germany, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Haddad, N.M.; Brudvig, L.A.; Clobert, J.; Davies, K.F.; Gonzalez, A.; Holt, R.D.; Lovejoy, T.; Sexton, J.O.; Austin, M.P.; Collins, C.D. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci. Adv. 2015, 1, e1500052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, M.; Li, W.; Zhu, L.; Guo, Z.X.; Zhao, Z.; Meng, N.; Han, M.J.; Wang, N.; Zhang, X.M. Degradation in edge forests caused by forest fragmentation. Carbon. Res. 2025, 4, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iqbal, P.M. The Threat of Coal Mine Expansion Towards Biodiversity in Kalimantan; Indonesia Perkumpulan Aksi Ekologi dan Emansipasi Rakyat (AEER): Jakarta, Indonesia, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Sonter, L.J.; Herrera, D.; Barrett, D.J.; Galford1, G.L.; Moran, C.J.; Soares-Filho, B.S. Mining drives extensive deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zeng, Z.H.; Estes, L.; Ziegler, A.D.; Chen, A.P.; Searchinger, T.; Hua, F.Y.; Guan, K.Y.; Jintrawet, A.; Wood, E.F. Highland cropland expansion and forest loss in Southeast Asia in the twenty-first century. Nat. Geosci. 2018, 11, 556–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, D.R.; Clark, M.; Buchanan, G.M.; Francesco, G.; Rondinini, C.; Tilman, D. Proactive conservation to prevent habitat losses to agricultural expansion. Nat. Sustain. 2021, 4, 314–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byers, A.K.; Wakelin, S.A.; Condron, L.; Black, A. Land Use Change Disrupts the Network Complexity and Stability of Soil Microbial Carbon Cycling Genes Across an Agricultural Mosaic Landscape. Microb. Ecol. 2024, 87, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vilhar, U.; Kermavnar, J.; Kozamernik, E.; Petrič, M.; Ravbar, N. The effects of large-scale forest disturbances on hydrology—An overview with special emphasis on karst aquifer systems. Earth Sci. Rev. 2022, 235, 104243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoegh-Guldberg, O.; Cai, R.; Poloczanska, E.S.; Brewer, P.G.; Sundby, S.; Hilmi, K.; Fabry, V.J.; Jung, S. The Ocean. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, in, Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Barros, V.R., Field, C.B., Dokken, D.J., Mastrandrea, M.D., Mach, K.J., Bilir, T.E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K.L., Estrada, Y.O., Genova, R.C., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 1655–1731. [Google Scholar]
- NOAA. Climate at a Glance: Global Time Series. National Centers for Environmental Information; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA): Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2025. Available online: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/climate-at-a-glance/global/time-series (accessed on 20 April 2025).
- The GlaMBIE Team. Community estimate of global glacier mass changes from 2000 to 2023. Nature 2025, 639, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- NASA. Antarctic Ice Mass Loss 2002–2023; National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): Washington, DC, USA, 2023. Available online: https://science.nasa.gov/resource/video-antarctic-ice-mass-loss-2002-2023/ (accessed on 13 April 2025).
- Schuur, E.A.G.; Abbott, B.W.; Commane, R.; Ernakovich, J.; Euskirchen, E.; Hugelius, G.; Grosse, G.; Jones, M.; Koven, C.; Leshyk, V.; et al. Permafrost and Climate Change: Carbon Cycle Feedbacks from the Warming Arctic. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2022, 47, 343–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- In ‘t Zandt, M.H.; Liebner, S.; Welte, C.U. Roles of Thermokarst Lakes in a Warming World. Trends Microbiol. 2020, 28, 769–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hugelius, G.; Ramage, J.; Burke, E.; Chatterjee, A.; Smallman, T.L.; Aalto, T.; Bastos, A.; Biasi, C.; Canadell, J.G.; Chandra, N.; et al. Permafrost Region Greenhouse Gas Budgets Suggest a Weak CO2 Sink and CH4 and N2O Sources, But Magnitudes Differ Between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Methods. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2024, 38, e2023GB007969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boers, N. Observation-based early-warning signals for a collapse of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. Nat. Clim. Change 2021, 11, 680–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sweet, W.V.; Horton, R.; Kopp, R.E.; LeGrande, A.N.; Romanou, A. Sea Level Rise. In Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment; Wuebbles, D.J., Fahey, D.W., Hibbard, K.A., Dokken, D.J., Stewart, B.C., Maycock, T.K., Eds.; U.S. Global Change Research Program: Washington, DC, USA, 2017; Volume I, pp. 333–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robinson, A.; Lehmann, J.; Barriopedro, D.; Rahmstorf, S.; Coumou, D. Increasing heat and rainfall extremes now far outside the historical climate. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 2021, 4, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- NASA Science Editorial Team. Steamy Relationships: How Atmospheric Water Vapor Amplifies Earth’s Greenhouse Effect; National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): Washington, DC, USA. Available online: https://science.nasa.gov/earth/climate-change/steamy-relationships-how-atmospheric-water-vapor-amplifies-earths-greenhouse-effect/ (accessed on 20 April 2025).
- Lee, W.Y.; Gim, H.J.; Park, S.K. Parameterizations of Snow Cover, Snow Albedo and Snow Density in Land Surface Models: A Comparative Review. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci. 2024, 60, 185–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wufu, A.; Chen, Y.; Yang, S.; Lou, H.; Wang, P.; Li, C.; Wang, J.; Ma, L. Changes in Glacial Meltwater Runoff and its Response to Climate Change in the Tianshan Region Detected Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Satellite Remote Sensing. Water 2021, 13, 1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thornalley, D.J.R.; Oppo, D.W.; Ortega, P.; Robson, J.I.; Brierley, C.M.; Davis, R.; Hall, I.R.; Moffa-Sanchez, P.; Rose, N.L.; Spooner, P.; et al. Anomalously weak Labrador Sea convection and Atlantic overturning during the past 150 years. Nature 2018, 556, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caesar, L.; Rahmstorf, S.; Robinson, A.; Feulner, G.; Saba, V. Observed fingerprint of a weakening Atlantic Ocean overturning circulation. Nature 2018, 556, 7700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Met Office. Factsheet: The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC); Met Office: Devon, UK, 2025.
- Lønborg, C.; Carreira, C.; Jickells, T.; Álvarez-Salgado, X.A. Impacts of Global Change on Ocean Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) Cycling. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020, 7, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tim DeVries, T.; Le Quéré, C.; Andrews, O.; Séférian, R. Decadal trends in the ocean carbon sink. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 11646–11651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armstrong McKay, D.I.; Staal, A.; Abrams, J.F.; Winkelmann, R.; Sakschewski, B.; Loriani, S.; Fetzer, I.; Cornell, S.E.; Rockström, J.; Lenton, T.M. Exceeding 1.5 °C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points. Science 2022, 377, 6611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, T.; Campos, R.; Mackres, E.; Staedicke, S.; Doust, M. What Would Cities Look Like with 3 Degrees C of Warming vs. 1.5? Far More Hazardous and Vastly Unequal; World Resource Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Spracklen, D.V.; Baker, J.C.A.; Garcia-Carreras, L.; Marsham, J.H. The Effects of Tropical Vegetation on Rainfall. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2018, 43, 193–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, R.; Lei, Y.N.; Lib, W.H.; Ariasc, P.A.; Dickinsona, R.E.; Lei, H.G.; Chakrabortya, S.; Fernandesd, K.; Liebmanne, B.; Fisherf, R.; et al. Increased dry-season length over southern Amazonia in recent decades and its implication for future climate projection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 18110–18115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brienen, R.; Phillips, O.; Feldpausch, T.; Gloor, E.; Baker, T.R.; Lloyd, L.; Lopez-Gonzalez, G.; Monteagudo-Mendoza, A.; Malhi, Y.; Lewis, S.L.; et al. Long-term decline of the Amazon carbon sink. Nature 2015, 519, 344–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Try, S.; Qin, X.S. Evaluation of Future Changes in Climate Extremes over Southeast Asia Using Downscaled CMIP6 GCM Projections. Water 2024, 16, 2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, T.-Y.; Hsiao, S.-C.; Wu, H.-L.; Chen, H.-G.; Chen, W.-B. Accelerated Ocean thermal expansion and its contribution to Global Sea-level rise. J. Sea Res. 2025, 205, 102589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Böning, C.; Behrens, E.; Biastoch, A.; Getzlaff, K.; Bamber, J.L. Emerging impact of Greenland meltwater on deepwater formation in the North Atlantic Ocean. Nat. Geosci. 2016, 9, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brennan, P. Greenland Melt Speeds East Coast Sea Level Rise; NASA Science Editorial Team; National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): Washington, DC, USA, 2024. Available online: https://science.nasa.gov/earth/climate-change/greenland-melt-speeds-east-coast-sea-level-rise/ (accessed on 20 June 2025).
- Kanzow, T.; Humbert, A.; Mölg, T.; Scheinert, M.; Braun, M.; Burchard, H.; Doglioni, F.; Hochreuther, P.; Horwath, M.; Huhn, O.; et al. The system of atmosphere, land, ice and ocean in the region near the 79N Glacier in northeast Greenland: Synthesis and key findings from the Greenland Ice Sheet–Ocean Interaction (GROCE) experiment. Cryosphere 2025, 19, 1789–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prakash, A.; Zhou, Q.; Hattermann, T.; Kirchner, N. Enhanced subglacial discharge amplifies Petermann Ice Shelf melting when ocean thermal forcing saturates. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 4213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, J.; Anderson, R.F.; Jin, Z.D.; Ji, X.; Thornalley, D.J.R.; Wu, L.; Thouveny, N.; Cai, Y.; Tan, L.; Zhang, F.; et al. Millennial atmospheric CO2 changes linked to ocean ventilation modes over past 150,000 years. Nat. Geosci. 2023, 16, 1166–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kashiwase, H.; Ohshima, K.I.; Nihashi, S.; Eicken, H. Evidence for ice-ocean albedo feedback in the Arctic Ocean shifting to a seasonal ice zone. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kristina Pistone, K.; Eisenman, I.; Ramanathan, V. Observational determination of albedo decrease caused by vanishing Arctic sea ice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 3322–3326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- WMO. State of the Global Climate 2024; World Meteorological Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Carrington, D. More than 150 ‘Unprecedented’ Climate Disasters Struck World in 2024, Says UN. The Guardian. 2025. Available online: https://amp.theguardian.com/environment/2025/mar/19/unprecedented-climate-disasters-extreme-weather-un-report (accessed on 22 April 2025).
- WWA. Climate Change Supercharged Late Typhoon Season in the Philippines, Highlighting the Need for Resilience to Consecutive Events; World Weather Attribution (WWA), Imperial College London and the Met Office: London, UK, 2024; Available online: https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/climate-change-supercharged-late-typhoon-season-in-the-philippines-highlighting-the-need-for-resilience-to-consecutive-events/ (accessed on 18 April 2025).
- CTIF. Record-Breaking Heatwaves Affect South America in 2025—New Large Wildfires in Chile and Argentina; International Association of Fire and Rescue Services: Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2025; Available online: https://ctif.org/news/record-breaking-heatwaves-affect-south-america-2025-new-large-wildfires-chile-and-argentina (accessed on 20 April 2025).
- Brunet, J.; Fragoso, F.P. What are the main reasons for the worldwide decline in pollinator populations? CABI Rev. 2024, 19, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations. Vietnam Multi-sector Assessment (VMSA) Report for Typhoon Yagi Recovery; United Nations: Ha Noi, Vietnam, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Euronews. Man Swept Away in Floodwater as Heavy Rainstorms Batter Parts of Northern Italy. Euronews. 2024. Available online: https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2024/09/06/man-swept-away-in-floodwater-as-heavy-rainstorms-batter-parts-of-northern-italy (accessed on 18 April 2025).
- Li, H.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, C.; Ürge-Vorsatz, D.; Carmeliet, J.; Bardhan, R. Cooling efficacy of trees across cities is determined by background climate, urban morphology, and tree trait. Commun. Earth Environ. 2024, 5, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iungman, T.; Cirach, M.; Marando, F.; Barboza, E.P.; Khomenko, S.; Masselot, P.; Quijal-Zamorano, M.; Mueller, N.; Gasparrini, A.; Urquiza, J.; et al. Cooling cities through urban green infrastructure: A health impact assessment of European cities. Lancet 2023, 401 (Suppl. S1), 577–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marando, F.; Heris, M.P.; Zulian, G.; Udías, A.; Mentaschi, L.; Chrysoulakis, N.; Parastatidis, D.; Maes, J. Urban heat island mitigation by green infrastructure in European functional urban areas. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 77, 103564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lwasa, S.; Seto, K.C.; Bai, X.; Blanco, H.; Gurney, K.R.; Kılkış, S.; Lucon, O.; Murakami, J.; Pan, J.; Sharifi, A.; et al. Urban systems and other settlements. In IPCC, 2022: Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Geneva, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 861–952. [Google Scholar]
- Sarip, S. 100 Million Tree Planting Campaign Program Organized by JPNP and UTM—The Power of Tree Planting as an Effective Carbon Sarip, S. offset Strategy; Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Johor Darul Ta’zim, Malaysia, 2023; Available online: https://news.utm.my/2023/08/program-100-million-tree-planting-campaign-organized-by-jpnp-and-utm-the-power-of-tree-planting-as-an-effective-carbon-offset-strategy/ (accessed on 22 April 2025).
- Gimino, G.; Rahim, R.; Vethasalam, R. M’sia Hits Target of Planting 100 Million Trees Ahead of Schedule. The Star. 2024. Available online: https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2024/12/10/m039sia-hits-target-of-planting-100-million-trees-ahead-of-schedule#:~:text=KUALA%20LUMPUR:%20Malaysia%20has%20achieved,on%20the%20Parliament%20complex%20grounds (accessed on 22 April 2025).
- Xinhua. China’s Sustained Afforestation Efforts Green the World; The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2023. Available online: http://english.scio.gov.cn/chinavoices/2023-04/06/content_85213960.htm (accessed on 20 April 2025).
- Cheng, K.; Yang, H.; Tao, S.; Su, Y.; Guan, H.; Ren, Y.; Hu, T.; Li, W.; Xu, G.; Chen, M.; et al. Carbon storage through China’s planted forest expansion. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 4106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Graham, D. How Many Trees Are There in China? Scientists Just Counted Them and Here’s What They Found? BBC Wildlife: London, UK, 2025; Available online: https://www.discoverwildlife.com/plant-facts/trees/how-many-trees-are-there-in-china (accessed on 20 April 2025).
- Chew, H.M. How Urbanized Singapore Is Learning to Live with Its Wildlife. CAN. 2020. Available online: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/singapore-wildlife-conservation-city-in-nature-reserves-hornbill-1339231 (accessed on 20 April 2025).
- Tan, M.; Ng, D. Sungai Buloh Wetland Reserve Celebrates 30 Years with Activities and Guided Walks to Previously Inaccessible areas. CAN. 2023. Available online: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/sungei-buloh-wetland-reserve-celebrates-30-years-activities-and-guided-walks-previously-inaccessible-areas-3948276 (accessed on 20 April 2025).
- Brenneisen, S.; Baumann, N. Green Roofs in Basel, Switzerland: Combining Mitigation and Adaptation Measures; Climate Adapt; European Environmental Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2020; Available online: https://climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu/en/metadata/case-studies/green-roofs-in-basel-switzerland-combining-mitigation-and-adaptation-measures-1 (accessed on 20 April 2025).
- Fang, Y.; Du, X.T.; Zhao, H.Y.; Hu, M.; Xu, X.M. Assessment of green roofs’ potential to improve the urban thermal environment: The case of Beijing. Environ. Res. 2023, 237 Pt 1, 116857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amani, M.J.; Tanzadeh, R.; Moghadas Nejad, F.; Kabiri Nasrabad, M.M.; Chalabii, J.; Movahedi Rad, M. Urban Sustainability Through Pavement Technologies: Reducing Urban Heat Islands with Cool Pavements. Buildings 2025, 15, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Melgar, P.; Delgado, M.G.; Romero García, C.; Ramos, J.S.; Domínguez, S.A. Nature-based cool pavements for urban overheating mitigation: Experimental proof of concept. Build. Environ. 2025, 267 Pt B, 112184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kousis, I.; Pisello, A.L. Evaluating the performance of cool pavements for urban heat island mitigation under realistic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urban. Clim. 2023, 49, 101470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buo, I.; Sagris, V.; Jaagus, J. High-resolution thermal exposure and shade maps for cool corridor planning. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 93, 104499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ariane Middel Cilek, A.; Unal, M.; Middel, A. The effects of 2-D and 3-D urban landscape metrics on mean radiant temperature in hot-arid Phoenix and Tempe, Arizona, USA. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 101, 105116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Sankei Shimbun. Tokyo Introduces Cool Pavements to Combat Heat Island Effect; The Sankei Shimbun: Tokyo, Japan, 2024; Available online: https://featured.japan-forward.com/japan2earth/2024/07/7818/ (accessed on 22 April 2025).
- Yan, S.; Zhang, T.; Wu, Y.; Lv, C.; Qi, F.; Chen, Y.; Wu, X.; Shen, Y. Cooling Effect of Trees with Different Attributes and Layouts on the Surface Heat Island of Urban Street Canyons in Summer. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziter, C.D.; Pedersen, E.J.; Kucharik, C.J.; Turner, M.G. Scale-dependent interactions between tree canopy cover and impervious surfaces reduce daytime urban heat during summer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 7575–7580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pimm, S.L.; Willigan, E.; Kolarova, A.; Huang, R. Reconnecting nature. Curr. Biol. 2021, 31, R1141–R1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campanales, S. Protecting the Endangered Wildlife of Borneo’s Last Peatlands. EcoAct. 2023. Available online: https://eco-act.com/blog/protecting-endangered-wildlife/ (accessed on 22 April 2025).
- Indriatmoko, Y.; Atmadja, S.S.; Utomo, N.A.; Ekaputri, A.D.; Komalasari, M. Katingan Peatland Restoration and Conservation Project, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, in, REDD+ on the Ground: A Case Book of Subnational Initiatives Across the Globe; Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR): Bogor, Indonesia, 2014; pp. 309–328. [Google Scholar]
- Keong, C.Y.; Onuma, A. Transboundary Ecological Conservation, Environmental Value, and Environmental Sustainability: Lessons from the Heart of Borneo. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mellgard, P. Life After Lignite: How Lusatia Has Returned to Nature. The Guardian. 2014. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/sep/10/lusatia-lignite-mining-germany-lake-district (accessed on 22 April 2025).
- Sosa, I.; Keenan, K. Impact Benefit Agreements Between Aboriginal Communities and Mining Companies Their Use in Canada. Indigenous Rights and Resource Governance Research Group (IRRG). 2001. Available online: https://fpic.info/en/resources/impact-benefit-agreements-between-aboriginal-commu/ (accessed on 22 April 2025).
- Meerveld, D. Assessing Value: A Comprehensive Study of Impact Benefit Agreements on Indigenous Communities of Canada; Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Ottawa: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2016; Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10393/34816 (accessed on 25 April 2025).
- Prno, J.; Bradshaw, B.; Lapierre, D. Impact and Benefit Agreements: Are They Working? Indigenous People Study Portal, University of Saskatchewan: Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 2010; Available online: https://iportal.usask.ca/record/28190 (accessed on 22 April 2025).
- van der Heyde, M.; Bunce, M.; Dixon, K.; Wardell-Johnson, G.; White, N.E.; Nevill, P. Changes in soil microbial communities in post-mine ecological restoration: Implications for monitoring using high throughput DNA sequencing. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 749, 142262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, S.; Ahmad, I.; Tahir Shah, M.; Rehman, S.; Khaliq, A. Use of constructed wetland for the removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewater. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 3451–3457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Madarász, B.; Jakab, G.; Szalai, Z.; Juhos, K.; Kotroczó, Z.; Tóth, A.; Ladányi, M. Long-term effects of conservation tillage on soil erosion in Central Europe: A random forest-based approach. Soil. Tillage Res. 2021, 209, 104959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.L.; Xiong, J.R.; Du, T.S.; Ju, X.T.; Gan, Y.T.; Li, S.E.; Xia, L.L.; Shen, Y.J.; Pacenka, S.; Steenhuis, T.S.; et al. Diversifying crop rotation increases food production, reduces net greenhouse gas emissions and improves soil health. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IFOAM Organics Europe. Organic Agriculture and Its Benefits for Climate and Biodiversity; IFOAM Organics Europe: Brussels, Belgium, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Gunawan, H.; Tryanto, D.H.; Mizuno, K.; Kozan, O. Toward Climate Change Mitigation: Restoration of the Indonesian Peat Swamp. In Vulnerability and Transformation of Indonesian Peatlands; Mizuno, K., Kozan, O., Gunawan, H., Eds.; Global Environmental Studies; Springer: Singapore, 2023; pp. 141–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Damastuti, E.; de Groot, R.; Debrot, A.O.; Silvius, M.J. Effectiveness of community-based mangrove management for biodiversity conservation: A case study from Central Java, Indonesia. Trees For. People 2022, 7, 100202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, W.Y.; Meyers, L.; Rudd, D.; Topa, S.H.; van Oppen, M.J.H. Heat-evolved algal symbionts enhance bleaching tolerance of adult corals without trade-off against growth. Glob. Change Biol. 2023, 29, 6945–6968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Christiansen, M.A.; Ivits-Wasser, V. Floodplains: A Natural System to Preserve and Restore; European Environmental Agency (EEA): Copenhagen, Denmark, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, H.Q.; Evans, S.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Song, W.Y.; You, X.Y. The Carbon Brief Profile: China. Carbon Brief. 2023. Available online: https://interactive.carbonbrief.org/the-carbon-brief-profile-china/index.html (accessed on 23 April 2025).
- Žilinskas, G.; Janušaitė, R.; Jarmalavičius, D.; Jukna, L.; Pupienis, D. Possibilities for Mitigating Coastal Erosion in the Downdrift Zone of Port Jetties Using Nearshore Nourishment: A Case Study of Klaipeda Port, Lithuania. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stanway, D. ‘Revive Our Ocean’ Initiative Launched to Protect Coastal Waters. Reuters. 2025. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/revive-our-ocean-initiative-launched-protect-coastal-waters-2025-04-24/ (accessed on 23 April 2025).
- Jaynes, C.H. Revive Our Ocean Initiative Aims to Increase Marine Protected Areas to Cover 30% of World’s Oceans by 2030. EcoWatch. 2025. Available online: https://www.ecowatch.com/revive-our-ocean-david-attenborough.html (accessed on 23 April 2025).
- IUCN. Peatlands and Climate Change; Issue Brief; International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN): Gland, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. FAO Launches Inaugural Field Project in Congo Basin to Advance Sustainable Peatland Management for Climate Action; Food and Agriculture of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2024; Available online: https://www.fao.org/forestry/newsroom/news-detail/fao-launches-inaugural-field-project-in-congo-basin-to-advance-sustainable-peatland-management-for-climate-action/en (accessed on 23 April 2025).
- Kiely, L.; Spracklen, D.V.; Arnold, S.R.; Papargyropoulou, E.; Conibear, L.; Wiedinmyer, C.; Knote, C.; Adrianto, H.A. Assessing costs of Indonesian fires and the benefits of restoring peatland. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 7044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mo, L.; Zohner, C.M.; Reich, P.B.; Liang, J.J.; de Miguel, S.; Nabuure, C.-J.; Renner, S.S.; van den Hoogen, J.; Araza, A.; Herold, M.; et al. Integrated global assessment of the natural forest carbon potential. Nature 2023, 624, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heinrich, V.H.A.; Vancutsem, C.; Dalagno, R.; Rosan, T.M.; Fawcett, D.; Silva-Junior, C.H.L.; Cassol, H.L.G.; Achard, F.; Jucker, T.; Silva, C.A. The carbon sink of secondary and degraded humid tropical forests. Nature 2023, 615, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bokhorst, S.; Bjerke, J.W.; Phoenix, G.K.; Jaakola, L.; Mæhre, H.K.; Tømmervik, H. Sub-arctic mosses and lichens show idiosyncratic responses to combinations of winter heatwaves, freezing and nitrogen deposition. Physiol. Plant. 2023, 175, e13882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schuuring, S.; Halvorsen, R.; Eidesen, P.B.; Niittynen, P.; Kemppinen, J.; Lang, S.I. High Arctic Vegetation Communities with a Thick Moss Layer Slow Active Layer Thaw. High Arctic vegetation communities with a thick moss layer slow active layer thaw. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2024, 129, e2023JG007880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holmgren, M.; Groten, F.; Carracedo, M.R.; Vink, S.; Limpens, J. Rewilding Risks for Peatland Permafrost. Ecosystems 2023, 26, 1806–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beer, C.; Zimov, N.; Olofsson, J.; Porada, P.; Zimov, S. Protection of Permafrost Soils from Thawing by Increasing Herbivore Density. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 4170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Robertson, D. Inside Copenhagen’s Race to Be the First Carbon-Neutral City. The Guardian. 2019. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2019/oct/11/inside-copenhagens-race-to-be-the-first-carbon-neutral-city (accessed on 23 April 2025).
- Skowron, A.; van Rie, R.; Martinez, A. Policy Roadmap for 100% Renewable Energy for Costa Rica: Achieving a Fully Decarbonized Energy System; World Future Council: Hamburg, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Poulsen, H. Taking Action to Stay Within 1.5 °C; Ørsted: Fredericia, Denmark, 2019; Available online: https://orsted.com/en/what-we-do/insights/white-papers/taking-action (accessed on 24 April 2025).
- Ørsted. Ørsted Annual Report 2024; Ørsted: Fredericia, Denmark, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Akotia, J.; Manu, E.; Opoku, A.; Sackey, E. The role of built environment practitioners in driving the socio-economic sustainability aspects of sustainable regeneration. Constr. Econ. Build. 2020, 20, 89–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Domain | Key Stressors | Data Sources |
---|---|---|
Atmosphere | 26 Gt C/yr fossil CO2 (1970–2024) | JRC/Crippa et al., 2024 [28]; Energy Institute, 2024 [29]. |
Atmospheric CO2 concentrations of 424.61 ppm (2024) | Lan, X. et al., 2025 [31]. | |
Hydrosphere | 372 Zetajouls (ZJ) heat (2021; +3000% since 1957) | NASA, 2024 [32]. |
2.8 Ωarag acidification | Richardson et al., 2023 [18]. | |
Cryosphere | 28 trillion tons ice loss (1994–2017)—a major driver of Arctic amplification | Slater et al., 2021; Harvey, C., 2021 [33,34]. |
Biosphere | 61.56 million ha (Mha) deforestation (2001–2023) | World Resource Institute/Weisse, M. et al., 2024 [5]; Global Forest Watch, 2025 [6]. |
>one million species at risk | IPBES, 2019 [35]. | |
Lithosphere | 5.57 Mha impacts (2020) | Giljum et al., 2022 [30]. |
8.2 Mha of land loss from agricultural conversion in Southeast Asia | Cabernard et al., 2024 [36]. |
Scale | Resource Flow (Input) | Systemic Threshold Breach (Output) | Quantification | Feedback Mechanism |
---|---|---|---|---|
Global | Fossil fuel combustion | Cryosphere destabilization (planetary boundary: ice mass stability) | 28 trillion tones of ice loss (1994–2024) | Ice-albedo feedback → accelerated warming |
Global | Material extraction | Lithosphere degradation (planetary boundary: land system change) | 5.57 Mha mining footprint (2020) | Habitat fragmentation → biodiversity loss |
Regional | Agricultural expansion | Biosphere degradation (planetary boundary: biosphere integrity) | 8.2 Mha SE Asian rainforest loss (2000–2020) | Reduced evapotranspiration → regional drying |
Local | Urban–industrial waste | Hydrospheric contamination (planetary boundary: novel entities) | Microplastic accumulation: 14 Mt/yr | Soil/water toxicity → ecosystem collapse |
Domain | Stressors (Industrial–Urban Impacts) | Quantified Stressor Effect | Stabilizing Solution (M-NbRS) | Quantified Benefit |
---|---|---|---|---|
Material Flows | Global material extraction | 100 billion tons/yr (8.6% circularity, 2020–2023 average) | Urban circular metabolism | Potential to increase circularity beyond 8.6% baseline |
Atmosphere | Fossil CO2 emissions | 37 billion tons/yr (2024); 424.61 ppm (↑30.38% since 1970) | Afforestation (China’s 142 billion trees) | 873.1 ± 16.2 Tg C stored (1.87 billion tons of CO2) |
Hydrosphere | Ocean heat accumulation | 372 Zettajoules (ZJ) (+3000% since 1957) | Peatland restoration | 98–153 Mt CO2e/yr sequestered (global peatlands) |
Biosphere | Deforestation (agricultural/mining demand) | 61.56 million hectares (Mha) lost (2001–2023); 420 Mha to cropland (1990–2020) | Heart of Borneo Initiative (transboundary forest ecosystem conservation) |
|
Lithosphere | Mining soil degradation | 5.57 Mha of forested land impacted (2020); 36 Mt CO2/yr | Indigenous co-management (Canada IBAs) | More than 1000 aquatic species revived (Lusatian Lakes) |
Cryosphere | Permafrost thaw | 1400–1700 GtC at risk | Permafrost insulation (Svalbard) | Conservation of permafrost carbon sink |
Earth System Impact | Key Mechanisms | Quantitative Metrics | Geographic Concentration | Sources |
---|---|---|---|---|
Biosphere collapse | Habitat loss and fragmentation |
| Southeast Asia (38%) | [35,36] |
| Latin America (36%) | |||
| Africa (23%) | |||
Climate feedback | Reduced carbon sequestration and edge effects |
| Global (tropics predominant) | [123] |
| ||||
Biospheric instability | Lithospheric transformation |
| Global (agricultural zones) | [128,129] |
| ||||
| ||||
Cross-system coupling | Deforestation → atmospheric CO2 release |
| Tropical forests | [18,31] |
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Keong, C.Y. The Vicious Cycle Atlas of Fragility: Mapping the Feedback Loops Between Industrial–Urban Metabolism and Earth System Collapse. Urban Sci. 2025, 9, 320. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9080320
Keong CY. The Vicious Cycle Atlas of Fragility: Mapping the Feedback Loops Between Industrial–Urban Metabolism and Earth System Collapse. Urban Science. 2025; 9(8):320. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9080320
Chicago/Turabian StyleKeong, Choy Yee. 2025. "The Vicious Cycle Atlas of Fragility: Mapping the Feedback Loops Between Industrial–Urban Metabolism and Earth System Collapse" Urban Science 9, no. 8: 320. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9080320
APA StyleKeong, C. Y. (2025). The Vicious Cycle Atlas of Fragility: Mapping the Feedback Loops Between Industrial–Urban Metabolism and Earth System Collapse. Urban Science, 9(8), 320. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9080320