Next Article in Journal
Steel Slag Sub-Ballast for Sustainable Railway Track Infrastructure
Previous Article in Journal
Bearing Capacity of Precast Concrete Joint Micropile Foundations in Embedded Layers: Predictions from Dynamic and Static Load Tests according to ASTM Standards
Previous Article in Special Issue
Railway Bridge Geometry Assessment Supported by Cutting-Edge Reality Capture Technologies and 3D As-Designed Models
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Infrastructures
Volume 9
Issue 7
10.3390/infrastructures9070105
infrastructures-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Correction to Infrastructures 2023, 8(7), 114.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Cabral et al. Railway Bridge Geometry Assessment Supported by Cutting-Edge Reality Capture Technologies and 3D As-Designed Models. Infrastructures 2023, 8, 114

by
Rafael Cabral
1,*,
Rogério Oliveira
2,
Diogo Ribeiro
2,
Anna M. Rakoczy
3,
Ricardo Santos
2,
Miguel Azenha
4 and
José Correia
1
1
CONSTRUCT, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
2
CONSTRUCT, Department of Civil Engineering, Polytechnic of Porto, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal
3
Department of Civil Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-664 Warsaw, Poland
4
ISISE, ARISE, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Infrastructures 2024, 9(7), 105; https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9070105
Submission received: 17 June 2024 / Accepted: 23 June 2024 / Published: 2 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing Techniques for Infrastructure Inspection and Monitoring)
Versions Notes

Error in Figure

In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figure 1 as published. The original figure caption didn’t cite the reference. The corrected figure caption of Figure 1 appears below.
Figure 1. Methodology for railway bridge virtual visual inspection: (i) recognition and preparation, (ii) data acquisition, (iii) reality capture, (iv) 3D as-designed model, and (v) condition assessment. Adapted with permission from ref. [34]. Copyright 2021, ICoM.

References

34.
Research Project mdfBIM+, RWTH Aachen University—Institute for Construction Management, Digital Construction and Robotics in Construction (ICoM). 2017. Available online: https://bmdv.bund.de/SharedDocs/DE/Artikel/DG/mfund-projekte/mdfbim-plus.html (accessed on 24 January 2024).
With this correction, a new reference 34 was added and the order of some references has been adjusted accordingly. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Cabral, R.; Oliveira, R.; Ribeiro, D.; Rakoczy, A.M.; Santos, R.; Azenha, M.; Correia, J. Railway Bridge Geometry Assessment Supported by Cutting-Edge Reality Capture Technologies and 3D As-Designed Models. Infrastructures 2023, 8, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cabral, R.; Oliveira, R.; Ribeiro, D.; Rakoczy, A.M.; Santos, R.; Azenha, M.; Correia, J. Correction: Cabral et al. Railway Bridge Geometry Assessment Supported by Cutting-Edge Reality Capture Technologies and 3D As-Designed Models. Infrastructures 2023, 8, 114. Infrastructures 2024, 9, 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9070105

AMA Style

Cabral R, Oliveira R, Ribeiro D, Rakoczy AM, Santos R, Azenha M, Correia J. Correction: Cabral et al. Railway Bridge Geometry Assessment Supported by Cutting-Edge Reality Capture Technologies and 3D As-Designed Models. Infrastructures 2023, 8, 114. Infrastructures. 2024; 9(7):105. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9070105

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cabral, Rafael, Rogério Oliveira, Diogo Ribeiro, Anna M. Rakoczy, Ricardo Santos, Miguel Azenha, and José Correia. 2024. "Correction: Cabral et al. Railway Bridge Geometry Assessment Supported by Cutting-Edge Reality Capture Technologies and 3D As-Designed Models. Infrastructures 2023, 8, 114" Infrastructures 9, no. 7: 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9070105

APA Style

Cabral, R., Oliveira, R., Ribeiro, D., Rakoczy, A. M., Santos, R., Azenha, M., & Correia, J. (2024). Correction: Cabral et al. Railway Bridge Geometry Assessment Supported by Cutting-Edge Reality Capture Technologies and 3D As-Designed Models. Infrastructures 2023, 8, 114. Infrastructures, 9(7), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9070105

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop