Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Post-Activation Potentiation on Swimming Starts in Adolescent Swimmers
Next Article in Special Issue
Isokinetic Dynamometer Leg Extensor Peak Torque Measurement: A Time-Delayed Reliability and Score Selection Analysis Study
Previous Article in Journal
Fiber-Type-Specific Hypertrophy with the Use of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reliability, Validity, and Comparison of Barbell Velocity Measurement Devices during the Jump Shrug and Hang High Pull
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JFMK
Volume 8
Issue 2
10.3390/jfmk8020053
jfmk-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Pennation Angle and Muscle Thickness on Mechanomyographic Amplitude–Torque Relationships and Sex-Related Differences in the Vastus Lateralis

by
Michael Trevino
*,
Sergio Perez
,
Stephanie Sontag
,
Alex Olmos
,
Sunggun Jeon
and
Lyric Richardson
Applied Neuromuscular Physiology Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Applied Health, and Recreation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2023, 8(2), 53; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk8020053
Submission received: 25 February 2023 / Revised: 17 April 2023 / Accepted: 27 April 2023 / Published: 2 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Movement Analysis 4.0)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study examined potential sex-related differences and correlations among the pennation angle (PA), muscle thickness (MT), and mechanomyographic amplitude (MMGRMS)–torque relationships of the vastus lateralis (VL) in 11 healthy males and 12 healthy females. The PA and MT of the VL were quantified with ultrasound. Participants performed an isometric muscle action of the knee extensors that linearly increased to 70% of maximal strength followed by a 12 s plateau. MMG was recorded from the VL. Linear regression models were fit to the log-transformed MMGRMS–torque relationships to calculate b terms (slopes) for the linearly increasing segment. MMGRMS was averaged during the plateau. Males exhibited greater PA (p < 0.001), MT (p = 0.027), b terms (p = 0.005), and MMGRMS (p = 0.016). The b terms were strongly (p < 0.001, r = 0.772) and moderately correlated (p = 0.004, r = 0.571) with PA and MT, respectively, while MMGRMS was moderately correlated with PA (p = 0.018, r = 0.500) and MT (p = 0.014, r = 0.515). The greater mechanical behavior of individuals possessing a larger PA and MT of the VL may reflect increased cross-bridge activity within the muscle fibers. Additionally, PA may help explain sex-related differences in MMGRMS between sexes.

1. Introduction

Ultrasound imaging is commonly used to quantify human muscle architecture [1,2,3]. Measures such as pennation angle and muscle thickness are frequently examined due to their influence on muscle strength [3,4,5,6]. For example, a muscle with larger pennation angles can have more fibers arranged in parallel for a respective volume, consequently allowing greater force-generating capabilities [7]. In addition, there are numerous reports that maximal strength is positively related to muscle size [4,8,9,10]. Therefore, pennation angle and muscle thickness are commonly of interest as they are key determinants for muscle performance.
The influence of pennation angle and muscle thickness on muscle activity has been frequently assessed during maximal and submaximal efforts [11,12,13,14]. Commonly, electromyography (EMG) is concurrently recorded to provide additional insight regarding skeletal muscle [15,16,17]. For example, relationships have been reported between changes in EMG amplitude (EMGRMS) and muscle thickness for the transverse abdominis [18], pennation angle and normalized EMGRMS for the plantar flexors and dorsiflexors during isometric contractions ranging from low to high intensities [15], and between muscle thickness and normalized EMGRMS for the rectus femoris during isometric contractions from low to maximal effort [19]. Therefore, evidence exists that the electrical activity of the muscle may be influenced by muscular architecture during maximal and submaximal contractions. However, markedly less is known regarding relationships between muscle architecture and the mechanical activity of muscle.
Surface mechanomyography (MMG) records low-frequency oscillations produced by muscle fibers during contractions [20]. It has been stated that MMG reflects the mechanical activity of neural activation [21]. For example, the amplitude of the MMG signal (MMGRMS) can be affected by active muscle stiffness resulting from the recruitment of motor units and their respective firing rates [22]. However, it appears that MMGRMS can also be influenced by the physical properties of the motor unit pool. For example, greater b terms (slopes) calculated from the log-transformed MMGRMS–force/torque relationships during linearly increasing and decreasing muscle actions, and MMGRMS values at steady force/torque, have been reported for individuals expressing greater amounts of type II percent myosin heavy chain isoform content [23,24,25,26]. In addition, MMGRMS–torque relationships can also be influenced by muscle architecture [27]. Sontag et al. [27] reported relationships between the muscle cross-sectional area of the vastus lateralis and the b terms (slopes) calculated from the log-transformed MMGRMS–torque relationships during an isometric ramp muscle action up to 70% of maximal strength, such as individuals with larger muscles exhibited b terms that plateaued later (greater slope values) throughout the torque spectrum. Due to previously reported positive relationships among muscle cross-sectional area, the relative increase in motor unit sizes with increments in recruitment thresholds, and type II percent myosin heavy chain expression for the vastus lateralis [28], Sontag et al. [27] suggested that individuals possessing greater muscle cross-sectional areas may have greater type II fiber diameters. Despite the association between muscle cross-sectional area and MMGRMS, no other studies have examined potential relationships among other muscle architecture measurements, such as muscle thickness and MMG.
Previously, Kawakami et al. [29] reported positive relationships (r = 0.61) between muscle thickness and pennation angle for the VL. It has been suggested that greater pennation angles allow for an increase in the packing of contractile proteins of the muscle [7]. Theoretically, this should allow greater cross-bridge activity within the muscle fibers, and, consequently, larger muscles would produce a greater amount of oscillations during contractions. Therefore, it is possible that relationships may also exist between pennation angle of the VL and MMGRMS. Similar to muscle thickness, relationships between pennation angle and MMGRMS–torque relationships have not been examined and also warrant investigation. In addition to relationships between muscle cross-sectional area and MMGRMS–torque relationships, Sontag et al. [27] reported sex-related differences in these variables. Consequently, muscle thickness and pennation angle may also help explain sex-related differences in the mechanical behavior of the VL.
Examining MMGRMS–torque relationships during linearly increasing muscle actions can become difficult due to the relatively large variability among individuals [30]. Thus, it has been suggested that the relationships should be examined on a subject-by-subject basis [31,32,33] since using ANOVA models or polynomial regression to analyze the composite MMGRMS means at various percentages of maximal strength does not always accurately describe the individual patterns of response [30]. Consequently, researchers have applied natural log transformations to the MMGRMS and torque values for each contraction in order to calculate slope values (b terms) and examine the individual patterns [25,34,35]. The 95% confidence intervals calculated around the group means for the b terms provide additional information regarding the linearity of the original MMGRMS–torque patterns. For example, the relationship is linear if the 95% confidence intervals include 1. In addition, 95% intervals that are less than 1 but greater than 0 indicate a nonlinear relationship with downward deceleration, as the rate of change is greater for torque than MMGRMS. During an isometric ramp muscle action up to 70% of maximal strength, positive relationships have been observed between muscle cross-sectional area and the b terms calculated from the log-transformed MMGRMS–torque relationships [27]. In addition, the b terms successfully differentiated the mechanical behavior of the VL between males and females during an isometric ramp up muscle action up to 70% of maximal strength [27]. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to measure muscle thickness, pennation angle, the b terms (slopes) calculated from the log-transformed MMGRMS–torque relationships during a linearly increasing contraction up to 70% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), and MMGRMS at 70% MVC steady torque of the VL for males and females. A trajectory that contains an increase to the targeted torque followed by a plateau was selected because ramp and step contractions are commonly used to investigate MMGRMS–torque/force relationships [21,22]. It was hypothesized that sex-related differences would exist for all variables, and muscle thickness and pennation angle would be correlated with MMGRMS parameters.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

A total of 11 healthy males (means ± SD; age: 20.18 ± 2.04 years; height: 178.51 ± 4.28 cm; body mass: 78.63 ± 9.11 kg) and 12 healthy females (age: 21.33 ± 3.00 years; height: 164.58 ± 6.60 cm; body mass: 60.38 ± 10.24 kg) participated in this investigation. The subjects did not engage in any form of structured exercise in the 3 years prior to this investigation or report any previous or ongoing neuromuscular diseases or musculoskeletal injuries. Approval was granted from the university institutional review board for human subjects’ research before data collection commenced, and all participants signed an informed consent form prior to participating.

2.2. Ultrasound Imaging

Real-time brightness-mode (B-mode) ultrasonography (LOGIQ e, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to measure pennation angle, muscle thickness, and subcutaneous (sFAT) of the VL. Before ultrasound imaging, participants laid supine for 10 min to allow fluid redistribution and minimize measurement error [36,37]. The ultrasound scans of the VL were taken at the midpoint of the anterior superior iliac spine and the superior border of the patella on the right leg (similar position to MMG sensor). Water-soluble transmission gel was applied generously to the multi-frequency linear array probe (12 L-RS; 5–13 MHz; 38.4-mm field of view) to enhance acoustic coupling and reduce possible near-field artifacts. The probe was orientated longitudinally and parallel to the fascicular path in the sagittal plane, and it was determined that the probe alignment was appropriate when multiple fascicles were easily delineated without interruption across the image. All ultrasound images were analyzed with ImageJ software (version 1.46r; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA), and each image was scaled from pixels to cm using the straight-line function. Pennation angle was calculated as the angle between the muscle fascicle and the deep aponeurosis. The average for three pennation angle measurements was used in subsequent analyses. Muscle thickness was defined as the perpendicular distance between the superficial and deep aponeurosis. sFAT was quantified as the perpendicular distance between the skin and superficial aponeurosis of the muscle. It has been reported that sFAT can low-pass-filter the MMG signal [38,39]. Therefore, sFAT was quantified to examine whether relationships existed with the MMGRMS parameters. Nonsignificant relationships would provide further confidence that sFAT was not a confounding factor for any MMGRMS findings.

2.3. Isometric Strength Testing

Each subject was seated with restraining straps over the pelvis, trunk, and contralateral thigh, and the lateral condyle of the femur was aligned with the input axis of a Bidoex System 3 isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY, USA) in accordance with the Biodex user guide. (Biodex Pro Manual, Applications/Operations, 1998). All isometric knee extensor strength assessments were performed on the right leg at a flexion of 90°. Isometric strength of the right knee extensor muscles was measured using the torque signal from the Biodex System 3 isokinetic dynamometer.
During experimental testing, subjects performed three three-second MVCs of the knee extensors with strong verbal encouragement. Three minutes of rest was given between trials, and the highest torque output was designated as the MVC. Following the MVCs, subjects performed an isometric submaximal muscle action. The template for the muscle action included a linearly increasing segment up to 70% MVC that increased 10% MVC/s to the target torque and a 12 s plateau (Figure 1). Therefore, the muscle action lasted 19 s. Subjects were digitally presented their torque output in real time on a monitor and were instructed to match the template as closely as possible. If they were not within 5% of the targeted template during the initial trial, they were given a second attempt after a 5-min rest period [40,41].

2.4. Mechanomyographic and Torque Signal Processing

During the submaximal muscle action, surface MMG signals were recorded from the VL with active miniature accelerometers (model 352A24, bandwidth = 10–8000 Hz, sensitivity of 98.8 mV m/s2, PCB Piezotronics, Inc, Depaw, NY, USA). The sensor was placed over the VL on the lateral/anterior portion of the muscle at half the distance of the greater trochanter and lateral condyle of the femur. Before sensor placement, the skin was shaved and cleaned with an alcohol wipe. The accelerometer was affixed to the skin with double-sided tape.
The MMG (m/s2) and torque (Nm) signals were simultaneously sampled at 2 kHz with a National Instruments compact data acquisition system (NI cDAQ-9174). The signals were bandpass-filtered (fourth-order Butterworth) at 5–100 Hz. For the submaximal muscle action, the torque and MMG signals were analyzed with consecutive, non-overlapping 0.25 s epochs [25,26,27,34,35]. The amplitude of the MMG signal was calculated with root mean square (RMS). The recorded signals were stored on a desktop computer and processed offline with custom-written software (LabVIEW, version 18; National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

For the linearly increasing segment of the targeted torque template, the torque and MMGRMS values for each quarter-second epoch underwent a natural log transformation, and simple linear regression models were applied [25,26,27,34,35]. The equations were represented as:
ln[Y] = b(ln[X]) + ln[a]
where ln[Y] represents the natural log of the MMGRMS values, ln[X] represents the natural log of the torque values, b represents the slope, and ln[a] = the natural log of the y-intercept. After the antilog transformation, this can also be expressed as an exponential equation:
Y = aXb
where Y = the predicted MMGRMS values, X represents torque, b represents the slope of Equation (1), and a represents the antilog of the y-intercept from Equation (1). For the 12 s steady torque segment, MMGRMS was calculated by averaging the values during the entire 12 s targeted contraction torque [25,26,34,35]. The b terms were calculated with Microsoft Excel® version 16.
Homogeneity of variances was assessed by performing preliminary Levene’s tests for all variables. All variables exhibited homogeneity (p > 0.081–0.975). Therefore, five separate independent sample t-tests were used to examine sex-related differences in b terms, MMGRMS at steady torque, pennation angle, muscle thickness, and sFAT. Additionally, six Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficients were calculated comparing the b terms and MMGRMS with pennation angle, muscle thickness, and sFAT. The level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. SPSS 25 was used to perform all statistical analyses (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Sex-Related Comparisons

Males exhibited greater b terms (p = 0.005, males = 0.649 ± 0.204, females = 0.424 ± 0.132, (Figure 2)); MMGRMS at steady torque (p = 0.016, males = 0.36 ± 0.06 m/s2, females = 0.27 ± 0.10 m/s2 (Figure 2)); pennation angle (p < 0.001, males = 17.98 ± 2.94°, females = 13.33 ± 2.41° (Figure 3)); and muscle thickness (p = 0.027, males = 2.49 ± 0.39 cm, females = 2.10 ± 0.40 cm (Figure 3)) for the VL. Additionally, females possessed greater sFAT than males (p < 0.001, females = 1.43 ± 0.46 cm, males = 0.62 ± 0.27 cm).

3.2. Correlations

The b terms were significantly correlated with pennation angle (p < 0.001, r = 0.772) and muscle thickness (p = 0.004, r = 0.571) (Figure 4) but not with sFAT (p = 0.263). Additionally, MMGRMS at steady torque was significantly correlated with pennation angle (p = 0.018, r = 0.500) and muscle thickness (p = 0.014, r = 0.515) but not with sFAT (p = 0.154) (Figure 4). It has been reported that sFAT may have a low-pass filtering effect on the MMG signal [38,39]; however, the lack of relationships between sFAT and the b terms during the linearly increasing segment and MMGRMS at steady torque suggests it was not responsible for the correlations among pennation angle and muscle thickness with MMGRMS parameters.

3.3. Sequential Multiple Regression Models for Pennation Angle and Muscle Thickness

Due to the significant correlations, a secondary analysis was performed examining the possibility of predicting pennation angle and muscle thickness with MMGRMS parameters. Preliminary analyses with Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests confirmed (p > 0.05) normality and homoscedasticity for both the b terms and MMGRMS. Subsequently, the b terms and MMGRMS were both entered individually and in combination by order of significance into separate linear regression models to investigate the potential for estimating pennation angle and muscle thickness, respectively. The tolerance and variable inflation factor for the b terms and MMGRMS for the pennation angle and muscle thickness estimation models were >0.240 and <4.2, respectively. Therefore, collinearity was not indicated between variables [42]. The b terms were the initial independent variable entered into both estimation models, as they had the strongest relationship with pennation angle and muscle thickness. However, adding MMGRMS to each model did not increase the ability to estimate pennation angle (p = 0.176) or muscle thickness (p = 0.099) greater than the b terms alone.

4. Discussion

As previously reported, males exhibited greater muscle thickness [43], pennation angles [43,44], and b terms for the VL [27]. Significant and novel findings include that pennation angle and muscle thickness accounted for large portions of the mechanical behavior of the VL during a linearly increasing muscle action up to and at a high-intensity targeted torque, and sex-related differences existed for MMGRMS recorded from the VL at steady torque. Subsequently, muscle architecture was able to show differences in the mechanical behavior of the VL between males and females during linearly increasing and steady-state torque production. In addition, the MMG signal recorded during a high-intensity contraction may provide insight into the muscle architecture of the VL.
For the log-transformed MMGRMS–torque relationships during the linearly increasing segment of the targeted torque trajectory, all 23 relationships (100%) were significant. The 95% confidence interval range for the b terms (0.449–0.614) was greater than 0 yet less than 1, indicating that the relationships decelerated (plateaued) as torque increased at a greater rate than MMGRMS.
Previously, the b terms differentiated individuals as a function of the muscle cross-sectional area of the VL [27]. It was suggested that the positive relationships were the result of individuals with larger muscle cross-sectional area values possessing larger sized fibers that expressed type II characteristics, since males and females have a similar fiber type distribution (ratio of slow- and fast-twitch fibers) for the VL [45,46,47,48], and type II fibers possess greater force twitches [49] and are less likely to fuse in response to increasing excitation from the central nervous system [50]. Therefore, it was hypothesized that positive relationships would exist between muscle thickness and MMGRMS parameters during the linearly increasing segment and at steady torque, which was supported in the current study. However, it should be noted that the relationships during the linearly increasing segment (r = 0.57) and at steady torque (r = 0.52) were not as strong as the relationship previously reported between the b terms and muscle cross-sectional area (r = 0.67) for the VL by Sontag et al. [27]. It has been reported that muscle thickness may not be as sensitive to total muscle volume as muscle cross-sectional area measurements [51]. Despite the sensor placement and ultrasound imaging site being similar (50% of the distance between the greater trochanter and the lateral condyle of the femur) between the current study and Sontag et al.’s [27], MMG measures the oscillations produced by the entire muscle and not just the motor units underlying the sensor [52]. Another consideration is that non-uniformed hypertrophy has previously been reported for lower limb muscles [53]. Although our subjects were untrained, it is possible that muscle thickness may have varied along the length of the VL, potentially resulting in participants having a greater muscle thickness at a measurement site than that measured in the current study. Nonetheless, the muscle thickness of the VL was positively correlated with the b terms during the linearly increasing segment and MMGRMS at steady torque, indicating that individuals with larger muscles exhibited a greater relative increase in MMGRMS with increments in torque and during steady torque production.
Previously, positive relationships have been reported between muscle thickness and pennation angle for lower limb muscles [29,43]. Consequently, it appears that increases in muscle size could be associated with increases in pennation angles [44]. In addition, Maxwell et al. [54] suggested that for muscles of constant length, fiber length, and fiber number, overall muscle size increases require increases in pennation angles and muscle thickness. Thus, it was hypothesized that positive relationships would exist between pennation angle and the b terms during the linearly increasing portion of the targeted torque trajectory and MMGRMS at steady torque, which was also supported in the current study. It is suggested that greater pennation angles allow increased contractile proteins within the muscle [44,55,56,57]. Consequently, it is plausible the larger b terms and MMGRMS at steady torque may reflect greater overall cross-bridge activity, resulting in an increased amount of oscillations recorded at the surface of the skin. Of note, the relationships between pennation angle and the b terms (p = 0.77) were stronger than the relationships previously reported (r = 0.67) between the b terms and muscle cross-sectional area. Conversely, the relationships between pennation angle and MMGRMS at steady torque were not as strong (r = 0.571). Therefore, pennation angle appears to have a greater influence on the relative increase in MMGRMS with increments in torque than the amplitude of the MMG signal during constant torque production. Recording MMGRMS up to a high-intensity targeted torque may be the more appropriate muscle action for examining sex-related mechanical behavior and may potentially provide an opportunity for estimating the pennation angle of the VL in sedentary males and females.
Another interesting finding was the sex-related differences in MMGRMS at steady torque. Although previous studies have reported sex-related differences in MMGRMS during linearly increasing muscle actions for upper- [58] and lower-body muscles [27], to our knowledge, this is the first study to report differences between males and females for the VL at a submaximal steady torque/force. Numerous examinations have reported no sex-related differences in MMGRMS of the VL during isokinetic [59,60,61,62,63] and isometric sustained knee extensions [64]. The ability of our study to discern MMGRMS at steady torque in males and females may be attributed to the targeted trajectory we utilized. For example, the linearly increasing segment that preceded the steady torque segment was performed at a slower rate of isometric torque development than traditional step contractions [64] and required less voluntary effort than isokinetic contractions [59,60,61,62,63]. Miller et al. [65] reported that contractions performed at a slower rate compared with a faster rate of isometric torque development resulted in greater recruitment of higher-threshold MUs during contractions at the same relative intensity. Therefore, the activation of a greater percentage of higher-threshold MUs, which are larger for males than females in the VL [28] and possess greater force twitches [66], may be responsible for the sex-related differences in MMGRMS at steady torque.
Another possible explanation for the differences in MMGRMS at steady torque between males and females may be the influence of percent myosin heavy chain expression. It has been reported that percent myosin heavy chain expression provides quantitative information regarding how much of the muscle is occupied by the three major fiber types (i.e., Type I, Type IIA, Type IIX) [67]. Positive relationships have previously been reported between motor unit firing rates and type I percent myosin heavy chain expression [36,68]. In addition, type I fibers possess slower contraction–relaxation rates [66], making motor units that are composed of fibers that express type I characteristics more susceptible to tetanizing [50]. Indeed, once motor units fuse, they are no longer capable of contributing to the amplitude of the MMG signal despite being active [69]. In support, individuals expressing greater type I percent myosin heavy chain expression have exhibited lower MMGRMS values during isometric [23,24,25,26] and dynamic knee extensor testing [70]. Although we did not collect muscle biopsies, the greater mechanical behavior displayed by the males during the linearly increasing segment (b terms) and at steady torque (MMGRMS) likely suggests percent myosin heavy chain expression differences between the sexes. Lastly, the findings suggest that using a targeted torque/force trajectory that contains a slow linearly increasing and steady segment may be more sensitive to sex-related differences in MMGRMS patterns of response than a rapid contraction.

5. Conclusions

In summary, this is the first study to report relationships among pennation angle and muscle thickness with the mechanical behavior of the VL during a linearly increasing and steady muscle action. It has been suggested that larger pennation angles allow increased packing of contractile tissue [7]. This was tentatively supported by the current study as individuals with larger pennation angles displayed greater oscillations at the surface of the skin (MMGRMS), and MMGRMS was greater for males, who exhibited significantly greater pennation angles and muscle thicknesses than females. MMGRMS may provide unique insight into muscle architecture and could potentially be used as a measurement tool to inexpensively quantify changes in pennation angle and muscle thickness. Future research should investigate the sensitivity of MMGRMS to potential changes in pennation angle and muscle thickness as a result of training interventions, aging, and/or neuromuscular diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T.; methodology, M.T.; formal analysis, M.T., S.P., S.S., A.O., S.J. and L.R.; investigation, M.T., S.P., S.S., A.O., S.J. and L.R.; data curation, M.T., S.P., S.S., A.O., S.J. and L.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T. and S.P.; writing—review and editing, M.T., S.P., S.S., A.O., S.J. and L.R.; funding acquisition, M.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Strength and Conditioning Association Foundation, grant number FND0074499.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of The University of Kansas-Lawrence (protocol code #00002953; 16 September 2015).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Please contact the corresponding author for access.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank P.R. Maier and J.D. Lippman who aided in data collection and analysis, as well as each subject for their selfless participation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hodges, P.; Pengel, L.; Herbert, R.; Gandevia, S. Measurement of muscle contraction with ultrasound imaging. Muscle Nerve Off. J. Am. Assoc. Electrodiagn. Med. 2003, 27, 682–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Miyatani, M.; Kanehisa, H.; Ito, M.; Kawakami, Y.; Fukunaga, T. The accuracy of volume estimates using ultrasound muscle thickness measurements in different muscle groups. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2004, 91, 264–272. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aagaard, P.; Andersen, J.L.; Dyhre-Poulsen, P.; Leffers, A.M.; Wagner, A.; Magnusson, S.P.; Halkjær-Kristensen, J.; Simonsen, E.B. A mechanism for increased contractile strength of human pennate muscle in response to strength training: Changes in muscle architecture. J. Physiol. 2001, 534, 613–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Strasser, E.M.; Draskovits, T.; Praschak, M.; Quittan, M.; Graf, A. Association between ultrasound measurements of muscle thickness, pennation angle, echogenicity and skeletal muscle strength in the elderly. Age 2013, 35, 2377–2388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Seymour, J.M.; Ward, K.; Sidhu, P.S.; Puthucheary, Z.; Steier, J.; Jolley, C.J.; Rafferty, G.; Polkey, M.I.; Moxham, J. Ultrasound measurement of rectus femoris cross-sectional area and the relationship with quadriceps strength in COPD. Thorax 2009, 64, 418–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rekabizaheh, M.; Rezasoltani, A.; Lahouti, B.; Namavarian, N. Pennation angle and fascicle length of human skeletal muscles to predict the strength of an individual muscle using real-time ultrasonography: A review of literature. J. Clin. Physiother. Res. 2016, 1, 42–48. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jones, D.; Rutherford, O. Human muscle strength training: The effects of three different regimens and the nature of the resultant changes. J. Physiol. 1987, 391, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Muraki, S.; Fukumoto, K.; Fukuda, O. Prediction of the muscle strength by the muscle thickness and hardness using ultrasound muscle hardness meter. Springerplus 2013, 2, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Freilich, R.; Kirsner, R.; Byrne, E. Isometric strength and thickness relationships in human quadriceps muscle. Neuromuscul. Disord. 1995, 5, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cadore, E.L.; Izquierdo, M.; Pinto, S.S.; Alberton, C.L.; Pinto, R.S.; Baroni, B.M.; Vaz, M.A.; Lanferdini, F.J.; Radaelli, R.; González-Izal, M. Neuromuscular adaptations to concurrent training in the elderly: Effects of intrasession exercise sequence. Age 2013, 35, 891–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Maganaris, C.N.; Baltzopoulos, V. Predictability of in vivo changes in pennation angle of human tibialis anterior muscle from rest to maximum isometric dorsiflexion. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1999, 79, 294–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Scott, S.H.; Winter, D.A. A comparison of three muscle pennation assumptions and their effect on isometric and isotonic force. J. Biomech. 1991, 24, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Narici, M.V.; Binzoni, T.; Hiltbrand, E.; Fasel, J.; Terrier, F.; Cerretelli, P. In vivo human gastrocnemius architecture with changing joint angle at rest and during graded isometric contraction. J. Physiol. 1996, 496, 287–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ito, M.; Kawakami, Y.; Ichinose, Y.; Fukashiro, S.; Fukunaga, T. Nonisometric behavior of fascicles during isometric contractions of a human muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 1998, 85, 1230–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Manal, K.; Roberts, D.P.; Buchanan, T.S. Can pennation angles be predicted from EMGs for the primary ankle plantar and dorsiflexors during isometric contractions? J. Biomech. 2008, 41, 2492–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Arampatzis, A.; Karamanidis, K.; Stafilidis, S.; Morey-Klapsing, G.; DeMonte, G.; Brüggemann, G.-P. Effect of different ankle-and knee-joint positions on gastrocnemius medialis fascicle length and EMG activity during isometric plantar flexion. J. Biomech. 2006, 39, 1891–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ruiz-Muñoz, M.; Cuesta-Vargas, A.I. Electromyography and sonomyography analysis of the tibialis anterior: A cross sectional study. J. Foot Ankle Res. 2014, 7, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. McMeeken, J.; Beith, I.; Newham, D.; Milligan, P.; Critchley, D. The relationship between EMG and change in thickness of transversus abdominis. Clin. Biomech. 2004, 19, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chauhan, B.; Hamzeh, M.A.; Cuesta-Vargas, A.I. Prediction of muscular architecture of the rectus femoris and vastus lateralis from EMG during isometric contractions in soccer players. Springerplus 2013, 2, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Orizio, C. Muscle sound: Bases for the introduction of a mechanomyographic signal in muscle studies. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 1993, 21, 201–243. [Google Scholar]
  21. Coburn, J.W.; Housh, T.J.; Cramer, J.T.; Weir, J.P.; Miller, J.M.; Beck, T.W.; Malek, M.H.; Johnson, G.O. Mechanomyographic time and frequency domain responses of the vastus medialis muscle during submaximal to maximal isometric and isokinetic muscle actions. Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 44, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Coburn, J.W.; Housh, T.J.; Cramer, J.T.; Weir, J.P.; Miller, J.M.; Beck, T.W.; Malek, M.H.; Johnson, G.O. Mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses of the vastus medialis muscle during isometric and concentric muscle actions. J. Strength. Cond. Res. 2005, 19, 412–420. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Herda, T.J.; Housh, T.J.; Fry, A.C.; Weir, J.P.; Schilling, B.K.; Ryan, E.D.; Cramer, J.T. A noninvasive, log-transform method for fiber type discrimination using mechanomyography. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2010, 20, 787–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Beck, T.W.; Housh, T.J.; Fry, A.C.; Cramer, J.T.; Weir, J.P.; Schilling, B.K.; Falvo, M.J.; Moore, C.A. The influence of muscle fiber type composition on the patterns of responses for electromyographic and mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency during a fatiguing submaximal isometric muscle action. Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2007, 47, 221–232. [Google Scholar]
  25. Trevino, M.A.; Herda, T.J.; Fry, A.C.; Gallagher, P.M.; Vardiman, J.P.; Mosier, E.M.; Miller, J.D. The influence of myosin heavy chain isoform content on mechanical behavior of the vastus lateralis in vivo. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2016, 28, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sontag, S.A.; Sterczala, A.J.; Miller, J.D.; Deckert, J.A.; Olmos, A.A.; Parra, M.E.; Dimmick, H.L.; Gallagher, P.M.; Fry, A.C.; Herda, T.J. A Noninvasive Test for Estimating Myosin Heavy Chain of the Vastus Lateralis in Females with Mechanomyography. Med. Eng. Phys. 2022, 111, 103946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sontag, S.A.; Trevino, M.A.; Herda, T.J.; Sterczala, A.J.; Miller, J.D.; Parra, M.E.; Dimmick, H.L.; Deckert, J. Endurance training alters motor unit activation strategies for the vastus lateralis, yet sex-related differences and relationships with muscle size remain. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2021, 121, 1367–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Trevino, M.; Sterczala, A.; Miller, J.; Wray, M.; Dimmick, H.; Ciccone, A.; Weir, J.; Gallagher, P.; Fry, A.; Herda, T. Sex-related differences in muscle size explained by amplitudes of higher-threshold motor unit action potentials and muscle fibre typing. Acta Physiol. 2019, 225, e13151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kawakami, Y.; Abe, T.; Kanehisa, H.; Fukunaga, T. Human skeletal muscle size and architecture: Variability and interdependence. Am. J. Hum. Biol. Off. J. Hum. Biol. Assoc. 2006, 18, 845–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ryan, E.D.; Beck, T.W.; Herda, T.J.; Hartman, M.J.; Stout, J.R.; Housh, T.J.; Cramer, J.T. Mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency responses during isometric ramp vs. step muscle actions. J. Neurosci. Methods 2008, 168, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Farina, D.; Merletti, R.; Enoka, R.M. The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG: An update. J. Appl. Physiol. 2014, 117, 1215–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Orizio, C.; Perini, R.; Veicsteinas, A. Muscular sound and force relationship during isometric contraction in man. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1989, 58, 528–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zwarts, M.J.; Keidel, M. Relationship between electrical and vibratory output of muscle during voluntary contraction and fatigue. Muscle Nerve 1991, 14, 756–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Trevino, M.A.; Herda, T.J. The effects of chronic exercise training status on motor unit activation and deactivation control strategies. J. Sports Sci. 2015, 34, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Olmos, A.A.; Herda, T.J.; Sontag, S.A.; Trevino, M.A. The influence of chronic training status on the mechanical behavior of the vastus lateralis during repetitive trapezoidal contractions. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 2022, 22, 161. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Trevino, M.A.; Dimmick, H.L.; Parra, M.E.; Sterczala, A.J.; Miller, J.D.; Deckert, J.A.; Gallagher, P.M.; Fry, A.C.; Weir, J.P.; Herda, T.J. Effects of continuous cycling training on motor unit firing rates, input excitation, and myosin heavy chain of the vastus lateralis in sedentary females. Exp. Brain Res. 2022, 240, 825–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Dimmick, H.L.; Miller, J.D.; Sterczala, A.J.; Trevino, M.A.; Herda, T.J. Vastus lateralis muscle tissue composition and motor unit properties in chronically endurance-trained vs. sedentary women. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2018, 118, 1789–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cooper, M.A.; Herda, T.J.; Vardiman, J.P.; Gallagher, P.M.; Fry, A.C. Relationships between skinfold thickness and electromyographic and mechanomyographic amplitude recorded during voluntary and non-voluntary muscle actions. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2014, 24, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Jaskolska, A.; Brzenczek, W.; Kisiel-Sajewicz, K.; Kawczynski, A.; Marusiak, J.; Jaskolski, A. The effect of skinfold on frequency of human muscle mechanomyogram. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2004, 14, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jeon, S.; Sontag, S.A.; Herda, T.J.; Trevino, M.A. Chronic training status affects muscle excitation of the vastus lateralis during repeated contractions. Sport. Med. Health Sci. 2023, 5, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Contessa, P.; De Luca, C.J.; Kline, J.C. The compensatory interaction between motor unit firing behavior and muscle force during fatigue. J. Neurophysiol. 2016, 116, 1579–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cohen, J.; Cohen, P.; West, S.G.; Aiken, L.S.; Cohen, J.; Cohen, J.; Cohen, P.; West, S.G.A.; Leona, S. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences; Routledge: Oxford, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kubo, K.; Kanehisa, H.; Azuma, K.; Ishizu, M.; Kuno, S.-Y.; Okada, M.; Fukunaga, T. Muscle architectural characteristics in young and elderly men and women. Int. J. Sport. Med. 2003, 24, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kawakami, Y.; Abe, T.; Fukunaga, T. Muscle-fiber pennation angles are greater in hypertrophied than in normal muscles. J. Appl. Physiol. 1993, 74, 2740–2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Miller, A.E.J.; MacDougall, J.; Tarnopolsky, M.; Sale, D. Gender differences in strength and muscle fiber characteristics. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1993, 66, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Schantz, P.; Randall Fox, E.; Norgren, P.; Tydén, A. The relationship between the mean muscle fibre area and the muscle cross-sectional area of the thigh in subjects with large differences in thigh girth. Acta Physiol. Scand. 1981, 113, 537–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Schantz, P.; Randall-Fox, E.; Hutchison, W.; Tydén, A.; Åstrand, P.O. Muscle fibre type distribution, muscle cross-sectional area and maximal voluntary strength in humans. Acta Physiol. 1983, 117, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Staron, R.S.; Hagerman, F.C.; Hikida, R.S.; Murray, T.F.; Hostler, D.P.; Crill, M.T.; Ragg, K.E.; Toma, K. Fiber type composition of the vastus lateralis muscle of young men and women. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2000, 48, 623–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Trappe, S.; Gallagher, P.; Harber, M.; Carrithers, J.; Fluckey, J.; Trappe, T. Single muscle fibre contractile properties in young and old men and women. J. Physiol. 2003, 552, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. De Luca, C.J.; Contessa, P. Biomechanical benefits of the onion-skin motor unit control scheme. J. Biomech. 2015, 48, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Franchi, M.V.; Longo, S.; Mallinson, J.; Quinlan, J.I.; Taylor, T.; Greenhaff, P.L.; Narici, M.V. Muscle thickness correlates to muscle cross-sectional area in the assessment of strength training-induced hypertrophy. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sport. 2018, 28, 846–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Barry, D.T. Acoustic signals from frog skeletal muscle. Biophys. J. 1987, 51, 769–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Handsfield, G.; Knaus, K.; Fiorentino, N.; Meyer, C.; Hart, J.; Blemker, S. Adding muscle where you need it: Non-uniform hypertrophy patterns in elite sprinters. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sport. 2017, 27, 1050–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Maxwell, L.; Faulkner, J.; Hyatt, G. Estimation of number of fibers in guinea pig skeletal muscles. J. Appl. Physiol. 1974, 37, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lieber, R.L.; Fridén, J. Clinical significance of skeletal muscle architecture. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2001, 383, 140–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lieber, R.L.; Fridén, J. Functional and clinical significance of skeletal muscle architecture. Muscle Nerve Off. J. Am. Assoc. Electrodiagn. Med. 2000, 23, 1647–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lieber, R.L. Can we just forget about pennation angle? J. Biomech. 2022, 132, 110954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nonaka, H.; Mita, K.; Akataki, K.; Watakabe, M.; Itoh, Y. Sex differences in mechanomyographic responses to voluntary isometric contractions. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 2006, 38, 1311–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cramer, J.T.; Housh, T.J.; Evetovich, T.K.; Johnson, G.O.; Ebersole, K.T.; Perry, S.R.; Bull, A.J. The relationships among peak torque, mean power output, mechanomyography, and electromyography in men and women during maximal, eccentric isokinetic muscle actions. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2002, 86, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cramer, J.T.; Housh, T.J.; Johnson, G.O.; Ebersole, K.T.; Perry, S.R.; Bull, A.J. Mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power output during maximal, concentric, isokinetic muscle actions. Muscle Nerve 2000, 23, 1826–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cramer, J.T.; Housh, T.J.; WEIR, J.E.; Johnson, G.O.; Ebersole, K.T.; Perry, S.R.; Bull, A.J. Power output, mechanomyographic, and electromyographic responses to maximal, concentric, isokinetic muscle actions in men and women. J. Strength. Cond. Res. 2002, 16, 399–408. [Google Scholar]
  62. Cramer, J.T.; Housh, T.J.; Weir, J.P.; Johnson, G.O.; Berning, J.M.; Perry, S.R.; Bull, A.J. Gender, muscle, and velocity comparisons of mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses during isokinetic muscle actions. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sport. 2004, 14, 116–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Evetovich, T.K.; Housh, T.J.; Johnson, G.O.; Smith, D.B.; Ebersole, K.T.; Perry, S.R. Gender comparisons of the mechanomyographic responses to maximal concentric and eccentric isokinetic muscle actions. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 1998, 30, 1697–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Keller, J.L.; Housh, T.J.; Hill, E.C.; Smith, C.M.; Schmidt, R.J.; Johnson, G.O. Are there sex-specific neuromuscular or force responses to fatiguing isometric muscle actions anchored to a high perceptual intensity? J. Strength. Cond. Res. 2022, 36, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Miller, J.D.; Lund, C.; Gingrich, M.D.; Schtul, K.L.; Wray, M.E.; Herda, T.J. The effect of rate of torque development on motor unit recruitment and firing rates during isometric voluntary trapezoidal contractions. Exp. Brain Res. 2019, 237, 2653–2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Garnett, R.; O’donovan, M.; Stephens, J.; Taylor, A. Motor unit organization of human medial gastrocnemius. J. Physiol. 1979, 287, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Fry, A.C.; Allemeier, C.A.; Staron, R.S. Correlation between percentage fiber type area and myosin heavy chain content in human skeletal muscle. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1994, 68, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Trevino, M.A.; Herda, T.J.; Fry, A.C.; Gallagher, P.M.; Vardiman, J.P.; Mosier, E.M.; Miller, J.D. Influence of the contractile properties of muscle on motor unit firing rates during a moderate-intensity contraction in vivo. J. Neurophysiol. 2016, 116, 552–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Bichler, E. Mechanomyograms recorded during evoked contractions of single motor units in the rat medial gastrocnemius muscle. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2000, 83, 310–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Fry, A.C.; Housh, T.J.; Cramer, J.B.; Weir, J.P.; Beck, T.W.; Schilling, B.K.; Miller, J.D.; Nicoll, J.X. Noninvasive Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Myosin Heavy Chain Expression in Trained and Untrained Men. J. Strength. Cond. Res. 2017, 31, 2355–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jfmk 08 00053 g001 550
Figure 1. An example of the mechanomyographic (MMG) signal from the vastus lateralis (VL) during the 70% isometric muscle action for 1 participant (top). The torque (bottom) is overlaid on the targeted template as it appeared for the participant during the trial. The dashed lines represent the linearly increasing (A) and steady torque (B) segments of the template. The portion of the MMG signal that corresponded with the respective segment (A,B) was selected for analysis.
Figure 1. An example of the mechanomyographic (MMG) signal from the vastus lateralis (VL) during the 70% isometric muscle action for 1 participant (top). The torque (bottom) is overlaid on the targeted template as it appeared for the participant during the trial. The dashed lines represent the linearly increasing (A) and steady torque (B) segments of the template. The portion of the MMG signal that corresponded with the respective segment (A,B) was selected for analysis.
Jfmk 08 00053 g001
Jfmk 08 00053 g002 550
Figure 2. Left (A): plotted individual values and means ± 95% confidence intervals for b terms from the mechanomyographic amplitude (MMGRMS) vs. torque relationship of the vastus lateralis (VL) for the males and females. Right (B): plotted individual values and means ± SD for MMGRMS of the VL during steady torque for the males and females. * Indicates greater b terms for the males than females (p = 0.005); ** indicates greater MMGRMS for males than females (p = 0.016).
Figure 2. Left (A): plotted individual values and means ± 95% confidence intervals for b terms from the mechanomyographic amplitude (MMGRMS) vs. torque relationship of the vastus lateralis (VL) for the males and females. Right (B): plotted individual values and means ± SD for MMGRMS of the VL during steady torque for the males and females. * Indicates greater b terms for the males than females (p = 0.005); ** indicates greater MMGRMS for males than females (p = 0.016).
Jfmk 08 00053 g002
Jfmk 08 00053 g003 550
Figure 3. Plotted individual values and means ± SD for pennation angle (left graph (A)) and muscle thickness (right graph (B)) of the vastus lateralis for males and females. * Indicates greater pennation angle for the males than females (p < 0.001); ** indicates greater muscle thickness for males than females (p = 0.027).
Figure 3. Plotted individual values and means ± SD for pennation angle (left graph (A)) and muscle thickness (right graph (B)) of the vastus lateralis for males and females. * Indicates greater pennation angle for the males than females (p < 0.001); ** indicates greater muscle thickness for males than females (p = 0.027).
Jfmk 08 00053 g003
Jfmk 08 00053 g004 550
Figure 4. Left graphs: the plotted relationships between the b terms from the log-transformed mechanomyographic amplitude (MMGRMS)–torque relationships during the linearly increasing segment and pennation angle (A) and muscle thickness (C). Right graphs: the plotted relationships between MMGRMS during steady torque and pennation angle (B) and muscle thickness (D).
Figure 4. Left graphs: the plotted relationships between the b terms from the log-transformed mechanomyographic amplitude (MMGRMS)–torque relationships during the linearly increasing segment and pennation angle (A) and muscle thickness (C). Right graphs: the plotted relationships between MMGRMS during steady torque and pennation angle (B) and muscle thickness (D).
Jfmk 08 00053 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Trevino, M.; Perez, S.; Sontag, S.; Olmos, A.; Jeon, S.; Richardson, L. Influence of Pennation Angle and Muscle Thickness on Mechanomyographic Amplitude–Torque Relationships and Sex-Related Differences in the Vastus Lateralis. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2023, 8, 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk8020053

AMA Style

Trevino M, Perez S, Sontag S, Olmos A, Jeon S, Richardson L. Influence of Pennation Angle and Muscle Thickness on Mechanomyographic Amplitude–Torque Relationships and Sex-Related Differences in the Vastus Lateralis. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 2023; 8(2):53. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk8020053

Chicago/Turabian Style

Trevino, Michael, Sergio Perez, Stephanie Sontag, Alex Olmos, Sunggun Jeon, and Lyric Richardson. 2023. "Influence of Pennation Angle and Muscle Thickness on Mechanomyographic Amplitude–Torque Relationships and Sex-Related Differences in the Vastus Lateralis" Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology 8, no. 2: 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk8020053

APA Style

Trevino, M., Perez, S., Sontag, S., Olmos, A., Jeon, S., & Richardson, L. (2023). Influence of Pennation Angle and Muscle Thickness on Mechanomyographic Amplitude–Torque Relationships and Sex-Related Differences in the Vastus Lateralis. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 8(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk8020053

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop