Next Article in Journal
Graph Theory: A Comprehensive Survey about Graph Theory Applications in Computer Science and Social Networks
Previous Article in Journal
Wind Turbines Offshore Foundations and Connections to Grid
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Worldwide Research on Low Cost Technologies through Bibliometric Analysis

by
Esther Salmerón-Manzano
1 and
Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro
2,*
1
Faculty of Law, Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR), Av. de la Paz, 137, 26006 Logroño, Spain
2
Department of Engineering, University of Almeria, ceiA3, 04120 Almeria, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inventions 2020, 5(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions5010009
Submission received: 24 November 2019 / Revised: 1 February 2020 / Accepted: 10 February 2020 / Published: 19 February 2020

Abstract

:
It is essential to address research into low-cost technologies, as those employed on a wide scale demand a great amount of resources. The main goal of this work was to analyze the research on low cost technologies worldwide by studying the scientific output recorded in the Scopus database. This analysis makes it possible to determine the evolution of research into low cost technologies. In particular, we analyzed the distribution of this research by the different scientific categories, the categories’ evolution over time, the types of publications, the geographical distribution throughout different countries, the main institutions in each scientific category, and the areas of research identified through the main keywords indexed in the publications. A remarkable finding of this work has been that the universities that are most active in low-cost technologies are those in the most technologically advanced countries. There is only one exception to the above statement and it is in the field of medicine, where the most technologically developed countries are not always the most interested in this field. Given the trends observed in recent years, there is a need for a major change and for low-cost technologies to become an area of interest in countries with emerging economies.

1. Introduction

Low-cost technologies are expected to be easy to build, to have little or no energy consumption, and should be easy to maintain and operate [1]. The use of sustainable technologies is essential in order to move towards greater global coverage of technology, and therefore to improve human quality of life [2]. However, existing technologies often require the use of various kinds of resources and generate an associated cost that cannot be met by developing countries [3].
There is no general agreement on what low-cost technology is. It can be argued that it should be technology that offers a more economical solution than the one traditionally offered, i.e., the commercial solution. Usually, this low-cost solution gives lower returns in absolute terms, but the returns are good enough to be considered. It has been a widespread trend that major technological advances are achieved by leading research centers, but usually at prohibitive costs that are absorbed by the general consumer market. Once the technological advancement is achieved, it is necessary to make efforts to adapt or achieve similar results with more accessible technologies, which are known as low-cost technologies. Low-cost technologies are sometimes linked to open source solutions for hardware, software, and standards. Many articles in the literature are available and can help to better explain the meaning and uses of low-cost and unconventional technologies [4]. In short, low-cost technologies make technical or practical applications feasible.
For several decades now, the arguments that have justified the social usefulness of research and innovation in universities or research centers have focused on the contributions they make to economic and social growth [5]. Economic growth would benefit from the increase in productivity in existing activities, while social development would come together with research and innovation through new areas of activity or the development of new models of relationships between people based on technology or the lowering of basic services, including access to energy [6].
Therefore, the technology of the future is a focus in today’s society, progressing some of the innovations that will spread in the next decades, which will not be as much a part of science fiction as one could imagine. At present, for instance, looking back only a few decades and imagining that the people of the time did not have something as basic as the smartphone makes one think of three very simple words: anything is possible. Another great example of technological advancement is the use of mobile phones that allow users to make phone calls from wherever and whenever they want, in almost any country in the world. In the future, it is very probable that another type of technology that now seems distant will be installed among the people in the most normal way. For this to be possible, technology must be accessible. In this respect, the key will be the development of low-cost technologies. Low-cost technology means resources that one can build oneself, or that one can obtain at a minimal cost, either because the technology has already been withdrawn or it is obtained free of charge for the user [7]. From a broader perspective, it would also include general market resources that can be used for another product or invention. These low-cost technologies (very close to do-it-yourself) require knowledge, which provides autonomy and self-sufficiency. One should be able to do much of the work on one’s own.
Low-cost products always respond to a specific need, even if no in-depth analysis of the situation or possible solutions has been carried out [8]. For users and their families, this artisanal solution is often the only possible solution, either temporarily or permanently, especially in developing countries. From a global point of view, this knowledge allows us to decide whether to invest funds in an industrial solution or to invest time in building a hand-made solution. Although low-cost solutions require a lower economic investment for their acquisition, it is very possible that it is necessary to dedicate more time to construction and maintenance, and this may mean that its efficiency is lower. On the other hand, commercial solutions may offer greater performance, be better finished, or be more reliable, but the difference in price may not make up for this increased quality.
Having the skill to apply scientific knowledge to inventions improves the use of industrial techniques in all their dimensions. According to the concepts of engineering, this is a career or profession in which skills are used in a correct way and with good judgment. Knowledge of natural sciences and mathematics are acquired through study, practice, and experience in order to be able to use the materials and forces of nature in an effective way to the benefit of society. Engineering should then be focused on low-cost technologies.
Scientific literature is the result of worldwide research [9]. In most studies, these works have gone through a revision process and have given rise to scientific publications, including books, articles in journals, and communications in specialized publications. These works are indexed in the scientific databases in order to facilitate the search for these works and to allow science to advance from work that has already been carried out [10]. There are those who define science as studies that are published in scientific journals [11]. In short, a scientific article is one of the methods inherent to science, the essential purpose of which is to communicate the results of research, ideas, and debates in a clear, concise, and reliable manner.
Until now, bibliometric studies related to the application of low-cost technologies have been applied to particular subjects. This can be found especially in fields related to medicine. For example, there are issues related to medicine, such as crowdsourcing, which is a tool used for outsourcing tasks, thus reducing the workload of the members of a particular organization [12]. Other issues include studies related to the interventions of waste collection workers, as they are often exposed to significant occupational risks [13], studies related to the lack of improvement in scientific integrity [14], or the challenges and opportunities faced by low-income countries concerning orthopedic information [15]. In the engineering field, bibliometric studies related to low-cost technologies are mainly focused on wastewater treatment [16,17] or carbon capture and storage [18]. It should be noted that very few bibliometric works are dedicated to low-cost technological issues; only some were found about Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) and only for a short period of time, i.e., from 2006 to 2016 [19]. Other studies focused on very specific technologies such as electronic tongue sensing in environmental aqueous matrices to replace more expensive techniques such as chromatographic systems used for environmental monitoring [20]. Other studies point out the limitations of bibliometric research, firstly, that the number of publications does not indicate the quality of the work, and secondly, that not all technological advances are published [21].
In short, all bibliometric studies in relation to low cost to date focus on very specific issues and no study has been detected that provides a global perspective on low-cost research. Nowadays, bibliometric publications are a very useful tool, since they offer a global vision of all the research works that have been carried out in a specific field of knowledge [22]. The objective of this work is to show the current state of research in low-cost technologies around the world, showing which are the main research fields, the main countries and institutions involved in each of those research fields.

2. Materials and Methods

The two major global databases of bibliographic references and journal citations are Web of Science (WoS) formerly Web of Knowledge (WOK), which is owned by Clarivate Analytics, and Scopus, which is owned by Elsevier [23]. Scopus is a multidisciplinary database for scientific research. The total coverage of the Scopus database by areas of knowledge can be summarized as follows: 5400 publications in Chemistry, Physics, Mathematics, and Engineering; 6300 publications in Life and Health Sciences; 1975 publications in Social Sciences, Psychology, and Economics. In addition, it offers interdisciplinary access to more than 27 million abstracts and citations. Therefore, the use of this database, Scopus, to make a bibliometric study in a particular field gives a sample size equal to or greater than the other global database [24]. Therefore, the expected results offered are equivalent to using other scientific databases [25], and in this work Scopus database was used.
In order to carry out this work, a bibliometric study has been carried out by consulting the Scopus database with the following search string TITLE-ABS-KEY (“low cost”), and, as will be seen below for the analysis by subfields, the specific searches have been limited to the indexation categories of Scopus, as for example for the Computer Science field, the search term was: (TITLE-ABS-KEY(“low cost”) AND (LIMIT-TO (“SUBJAREA,”“COMP”))). Figure 1 shows the methodology applied in this research, the main search is done in the Scopus database and the data analysis in Excel. Note that it has also been tested with the term “low-cost”, and the results were not different. In mathematics, it draws attention because a priori it did not seem a term of scientific importance here, so that this discipline uses low cost at the same level as other categories such as the energy category, since this term is linked to the economy. Regarding the category of medicine, it is also noteworthy that low-cost solutions are sought from the point of view of research. The reasons for this will be discussed later.

3. Results

The search found 292,335 documents from 1950 to 2018. Figure 2 presents these results as a percentage. It is observed that 10 categories are the most representative, these are: Engineering, Materials Science, Computer Science, Physics and Astronomy, Chemistry, Medicine, Chemical Engineering, Energy, Environmental Science, and Mathematics. It should be noted that in total there are 27 subject categories involved in these publications. As expected, the publications are led by Engineering, followed by Material Science. However, among this top 10, the categories of Medicine and Mathematics stand out, since they do not seem to be cost-related fields.
Figure 3 shows the evolution trend of these publications. The engineering category has always led the way on this issue. Regarding the second post, until 2006 it was the Physics and Astronomy category, from then on it was the Computer Science category until 2014, where from then became the Mathematics category. These last three categories have always been in the positions of second to fourth. In fifth place has always been the Chemistry category.

3.1. Types of Publications

Analyzing the type of publication according to the indexation category, the following can be found: Abstract Report, Article, Book, Book Chapter, Business Article, Conference Paper, Conference Review, Editorial, Erratum, Letter, Note, Report, Retracted, Review, and Short Survey. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the type of publication for the top 10 scientific categories.
The chemical category has the highest percentage of articles with 88.4%, followed by chemical engineering with 79.5%. Regarding conference papers, they lead the Computer Science categories with 69.6% followed by Mathematics with 68.6%. Regarding the book chapters, the representation is very low, only 2% notable in the category of Medicine. In this same category the high percentage of report stands out with 10.4%. In broad terms, science is more established in a particular field [26], if the percentage of books is significant, which is not the case in this field. For example, the most cited article in the low cost subject, “A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films” [27] with 22,465 cites, was compared with the most cited conference paper, “Cricket location-support system” [28] cited 2703 times; it was observed that the articles were cited approximately 10 times more than conference papers.

3.2. Distribution of Publications by Countries

Figure 5 shows a world map with the scientific production of countries on the topic of low cost. It is observed that the great development of this field is in industrialized countries and that they are technological strengths, such is the case of USA (20%), China (16%), India (5%), and European countries. Table 1 shows the publications in the 30 main countries and the percentage of the total that they represent. It should be clarified that the Scopus database, when counting the documents by country, indexes a document as many times as there are different affiliations, then the sum of publications by country could be greater than the total sum of works; generally this does not happen as there are many publications with undefined country.
Table 2 and Table 3 show the top 20 countries in scientific production with respect to the low-cost topic. United States leads the categories of: Engineering, Computer Science, Physics and Astronomy, Medicine, Environmental Science, and Mathematics. China leads the categories of: Materials Science, Chemistry, Chemical Engineering, and Energy.
India has a very prominent role occupying relevant positions in these categories: Engineering (4), Materials Science (3), Computer Science (3), Physics and Astronomy (6), Chemistry (3), Medicine (5), Chemical Engineering (3), Energy (3), Environmental Science (3), and Mathematics (5).
United Kingdom also stands out by occupying relevant positions in these categories: Engineering (3), Materials Science (6), Computer Science (3), Physics and Astronomy (3), Chemistry (4), Medicine (2), Chemical Engineering (5), Energy (4), Environmental Science (4), and Mathematics (4).
Broadly speaking, these are the same countries that make the effort to research low-cost technologies independently of the scientific area. Perhaps the scientific category less like the others is Medicine, where countries such as Belgium or Mexico appear in this top 20.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the distribution with scientific areas shows that in general the countries have a similar percentage distribution in all areas, see Figure 6. The efforts are not polarized in function of the scientific field, but it is a constant and transversal bet in all the areas of knowledge affected.

3.3. Distribution of Publications by Affiliation

The distribution of the scientific effort by affiliations shows those institutions that are more specialized in each scientific field in the subject of low cost. In the case of the Engineering category, Table 4, it is observed the large number of institutions in China, because about half of the top 20 institutions are from this country, and leading the category with two of these affiliations: Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Ministry of Education China.
For the categories of Materials Science and Computer Science, it is the same as for Engineering, which are categories dominated by Chinese institutions. The first institution from another country is the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, USA, which is in third or fourth place for the three categories cited. This institution has an endowment of $2.091 billion (2018) for 32,718 students.
In the third and fourth categories, Table 5, Physics and Astronomy, and Chemistry, it happens as in the previous categories that are led in the first two places by Chinese institutions: Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Ministry of Education China. It is striking that the third place is for the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) in the category of Physics and Astronomy. The CNRS is the most important research institution in France and has a multidisciplinary character. This institution also ranks sixth in the Chemistry category.
In the Medicine category, Table 6, a different dynamic is observed from the rest of the categories, clearly dominated by USA institutions, since of the first 20 institutions, 14 are from the USA, including the first one, Harvard Medical School. It is noteworthy that the second institution is from Brazil, the Universidade de Sao Paulo (USP), the sixth from the UK (London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), the seventh from Canada (University of Toronto), and the eighth from France (Inserm).
In the Chemical Engineering and Energy categories, the general dynamic is dominated by Chinese institutions, but even more accentuated, where the first five institutions are from this country, see Table 6. In the Energy category, the first two US institutions occupy the 7th and 9th places, Georgia Institute of Technology National and Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).
The last two categories studied are those of Environmental Science and Mathematics, see Table 7, which follow the general dynamic of being led by Chinese institutions in at least the first three places. From the fifth place in the category of Environmental Science appears a Brazilian institution, Universidade de Sao Paulo (USP). Moreover, in the Mathematics category in fourth place is an institution from France, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS).

3.4. Analisys of Keywords by Categories

Keyword analysis shows the major lines of research in a field. Table 8 shows the top 20 keywords for the first three categories analyzed. Thus, for the category of Engineering it is observed that it is dominated by two great subfields of engineering as they are the electronics and the computer science, and at the same time supported by the mathematics. Since in the first place of the keywords of this category appears Sensors, and Computer Simulation in fourth place. On the other hand, Algorithms and Optimization, are mathematical tools widely used in engineering, through computer science. The most cited work in this category is “A survey on sensor networks” [29]. Other examples are those related to relatively recent technologies such as GPS, “GPS-less low-cost outdoor localization for very small devices” [30], or the synthesis of biodiesel, “Synthesis of biodiesel via acid catalysis” [31]
In the Materials Science category, research is led by Solar Cells, followed by Electrodes and Substrates. It is striking that the fourth place is for an analysis technique such as Scanning Electron Microscopy, as it has proven to be an indispensable technique for the analysis of materials. The most cited work in Materials Science category is “Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets” [32]. Other examples are related to batteries, “Challenges for rechargeable Li batteries” [33], “Sodium-ion batteries” [34].
In the Computer Science category, the situation is very similar in the first keywords to the Engineering category, dominated by Algorithms and Sensors. In third position appears Wireless Telecommunication Systems; without a doubt it is in this field where a great research effort is being made in the topic of the low cost. The most cited work in Computer Science [29] category is the same as for Engineering category, this is possible because some works can be indexed in several categories. Concerning the algorithms, works such as the following stand out, “Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data” [35].
Table 9 shows the main keywords in categories 4 to 6, Physics and Astronomy, Chemistry, and Medicine. Then, for the Physics and Astronomy category, it was found again that the subject of sensors is the main keyword. Followed in second and third place by Substrates, and Thin Films. In fourth place appears the Scanning Electron Microscopy. One could say that it is very similar to the category of materials, changing very little the order of the main keywords. Then, it can be concluded that there is a high degree of research in the field of physics oriented to the science of materials. The most cited work in the category of Physics and Astronomy is “A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu” [36]. Related to cost effectiveness, following manuscript is worth highlighting “TiO 2 photocatalysis: A historical overview and future prospects” [37].
In the category of Chemistry, Electrodes is found as the main keyword, which was also the first in the category of materials. The second keyword is Adsorption, followed by the aforementioned Scanning Electron Microscopy technique. As main materials studied in chemistry related to low cost, there are carbon, nanoparticles, and Graphene. The most cited work in the category of Chemistry is the same as for the category of Physics and Astronomy [36]; some journals are indexed in several categories as is the case of Journal of Chemical Physics. The works related to the batteries are very outstanding in this category, they are the ones related to the keyword electrodes, as “Challenges for rechargeable Li batteries” [38], or “Lithium batteries and cathode materials” [39].
In the category of medicine, it is focused on studies by gender or by age, as they are led by: Female, Male, and Adult. In general, medical research on low cost is focused on the cost of trials: Major Clinical Study, Procedures, Methodology, Clinical Article, or Clinical Trial. It is noteworthy that Treatment Outcome is only ranked 16th on the list. The most cited manuscript in this category is “Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control” [40], with 4593 cites. Much of this highly cited work is also related to genetics, as “Single cell gel/comet assay: Guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing” [41], or “MEGAN analysis of metagenomic data” [42].
Table 10 shows the top 20 keywords in the categories Chemical Engineering, and Energy. In the Chemical Engineering category, one finds the same as in the Chemistry category, which does not attract attention as in essence the research results are published in the same journals. The most cited work in Chemical Engineering category is the same as for Material Science [32]. Related to the most cited keyword in this category, adsorption, highlight in the work “Biosorbents for heavy metals removal and their future” [43].
The energy category has its first two keywords just like the materials category with Solar Cells and Electrodes. It is observed that this category is dominated by solar energy, energy conservation especially in the subject of batteries: Secondary Batteries, Electric Batteries, or Fuel Cells. As a remarkable result there is the issue of biomass, which is undoubtedly an alternative to generating energy cheaply especially if it is agricultural waste or industry. The most cited work in this category is “Non-conventional low-cost adsorbents for dye removal: A review” [44]. Additionally, related to energy storage, the following paper stands out: “Room-temperature stationary sodium-ion batteries for large-scale electric energy storage” [45].
In Table 11, the main keywords of the Environmental Science and Mathematics categories are shown. The Environmental Science category is dominated by: Adsorption and PH. The most cited work is “Single cell gel/comet assay: Guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing” [41]. It is striking that in this category focused on low cost is the recovery and treatment of water: Wastewater Treatment, Water Treatment, Aqueous Solution, Wastewater, Water Pollutants (Chemical), and Waste Water Management. One of the most innovative research topics in water treatment is advanced oxidation [46]. The treatment of water and its pollutants does not need any further explanation as it is a major problem worldwide [47], and for all types of industries and even agriculture, for example, nitrate pollution of aquifers [48].
The low-cost mathematics category is quite similar to Engineering, which is natural because engineering problems are solved with advanced mathematical tools. What is striking is that there are many terms for robotics and artificial vision, given that image processing has a high computational cost and making it more efficient saves time and really reach the concept of real time decision making. In this sense the key words related to this subject are: Cameras, Robotics, Image Processing, Signal Processing, Computer Vision, or Artificial Intelligence. The most cited manuscript is this category is “Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD” [49], which as observed is a work of Computational Chemistry. This field of research has a strong link to bioinformatics, e.g., “The metagenomics RAST server—A public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes” [50]. Note that metagenomics is the technique, that uses the techniques of massive sequencing of DNA to transfer all the microorganisms present in a given environment to the laboratory [51]; this is largely possible due to the evolution of lower cost DNA sequencing techniques [52].

4. Discussions

The results show that the global trend towards research into low-cost technologies is increasing exponentially, especially since 2000. As expected, the engineering category is the one that has always led the way in the number of scientific publications. With respect to the other scientific categories, there was a period, between 2006 and 2014, that the computer science category was undoubtedly the second. In the last year with full data, 2018, however, the categories of Mathematics, computer science, and Physics and Astronomy are very close.
In the later analysis of the main keywords it has been observed that Engineering and Computer science share the same subjects. The same occurs on the one hand between the categories of Materials Science, Physics and Astronomy, and Energy, and on the other hand with the categories of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering. Medicine is the only one that does not seem like any other and should be studied separately as a case study.
These documents are published mainly in the form of articles, apart from computer science and mathematics, which dominated by conference papers. This is usually the case in these fields of research where the congresses have great recognition among researchers.
The distribution by countries shows that the countries with the most technological development also do so in research into low-cost technologies. Above all, the role of USA, China, India, the UK, and Germany stands out, these five countries being always in the first positions of all the studied scientific categories. However, if the distribution of the efforts of each country by the different scientific disciplines is analyzed, there are practically no differences between them. That is to say that the industrialized countries are investing efforts in a similar way in the main branches of the science studied, and that they are the most important in low-cost subjects. Research centers, which are really where research is taking place, are dominated by Chinese institutions across the board in all scientific categories. Only the exception is found in the category of medicine, where there is no Chinese institution in the top 20.
Table 1 shows the top 30 countries with the most low-cost publications and calculates the ratio per million inhabitants. It shows how the Asian countries, Singapore and Hong Kong, occupy the top positions together with Switzerland in third position and Australia in fourth position. Regarding the countries with more than 200 million people, the USA leads the ranking with a ratio above 200, while Brazil and China are around 43 and 40, respectively, and finally China with a ratio around 13.
About publications in terms of total investment in research, Gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD), Iran stands out in the first position, perhaps because of its current particular commercial relationship with the rest of the world. This rank is followed by European Union countries in this order: Greece, Portugal, Spain, and Italy. These are countries with a high level of technological education and expertise but with more limited research resources, and their researchers are proportionally paying attention to low-cost technologies. Regarding the countries with more than 200 million people, India leads the ranking with a ratio above 360, while Brazil and Mexico are around 226 and 221, respectively, and finally, the USA and China are around 130 and 113, respectively.
In this research it has been shown that the effort in low-cost technologies, except for special circumstances such as those of Iran, is being made by countries of the European Union that have great access to technology, but their investment in it does not reach that of the great economies of the world. All G8 countries, except Italy and Canada, are at the end of the list of low-cost publications in respect of their investment in R&D, see Figure 7. The implications of several studies suggest that investment in R&D is very important for long-term productivity [53]. It should be noted that the leading economies had already addressed the issue of low cost and its relationship to productivity, to what was called “low-cost producer” strategy [54]. They concluded to reduce costs, which had an immediate negative effect on quality, delivery, and market share. However, low-cost solutions are being used in various sectors with very good results, for example in the field of construction, where energy efficiencies in buildings are obtained simply by adopting bioclimatic architectural measures [55,56]. In agricultural topics several low-cost solutions can be found that make agricultural systems more sustainable from an economic [57], environmental [58], and social point of view [59]. This report aims to record the strong interconnections between low-cost technologies and the economic and environmental dimensions of sustainability from the perspective of being advantageous to strategies promoting national and regional economic growth. In broad terms, these solutions make production more sustainable, and therefore, the benefits are for the user but also for society, as the interdependencies and trade-offs between these aspects are important, and economic sustainability should not be seen in isolation as the sole driver.

5. Conclusions

The construction of a system of research and innovation by universities or research institutions for technological development should also be promoted with a view to low-cost technology, as this will certainly contribute to the well-being of society and the popularization of technology. To this end, it is essential that the various social agents have a systemic vision of how to approach the problems to be solved in the technological field in order to make them more sustainable. This research shows that low-cost technologies are being developed by the most technologically advanced countries, and by the most advanced research institutions in the technological world. With respect to the scientific categories that work more in low cost can be summarized or grouped into five, the first would be the one that groups: Engineering, Computer Science, and Mathematics, focused on lower costs and especially in communications and sensors, which include the mathematical algorithms of optimization that solve engineering problems. The second category also includes: Materials, Physics and astronomy and energy, especially in the study of solar cells from different points of view and in many cases using electronic microscopy (Scanning Electron Microscopy) as a fundamental tool in research in these fields. The third category includes Chemistry and Chemical Engineering with a great focus on the study of Graphene, and with the most cited technique X-Ray Diffraction. The fourth category would be Environmental Science with a strong focus on Water Treatment. Finally, category five is the most singular of all, and the one that we can consider with little relation to the others: the category of medicine, which is not only different by the subjects treated as expected, but by the institutions and countries that lead it, especially from the USA (Harvard Medical School or the University of Washington, Seattle, WA) and UK (London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine). However, there are also institutions from France (Inserm), Brazil (Universidade de Sao Paulo-USP), and Canada (University of Toronto, ON).
This work highlights that the main lines of research in low-cost technologies are carried out by highly technological countries and by those institutions with greater research potential. It therefore seems complicated to transfer this so-called modern technology, although low-cost, to the countries of the developing world. The inadequate adaptation of low-cost technologies to the economic, social and cultural context of the countries that should use them has been proven in practice. A technological change is therefore required that, by applying the principles of sustainable development, adapts and improves the systems of capture, treatment, and reuse, until they become fully sustainable systems. The paper concludes that low-cost technology research is clearly important for economic development at various scales.

Author Contributions

E.S.-M. and F.M.-A. conceived the research, designed the search, and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank to the CIAIMBITAL (University of Almeria, CeiA3) for its support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Viciana, E.; Alcayde, A.; Montoya, F.G.; Baños, R.; Arrabal-Campos, F.M.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. An open hardware design for internet of things power quality and energy saving solutions. Sensors 2019, 19, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. AlFaris, F.; Juaidi, A.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Improvement of efficiency through an energy management program as a sustainable practice in schools. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 135, 794–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Juaidi, A.; Montoya, F.G.; Ibrik, I.H.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. An overview of renewable energy potential in Palestine. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 65, 943–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Anzalone, G.C.; Zhang, C.; Wijnen, B.; Sanders, P.G.; Pearce, J.M. A low-cost open-source metal 3-D printer. IEEE Access 2013, 1, 803–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Salmerón-Manzano, E.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. The higher education sustainability through virtual laboratories: The Spanish university as case of study. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Banos, R.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F.; Montoya, F.G.; Gil, C.; Alcayde, A.; Gómez, J. Optimization methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 1753–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gázquez, J.A.; Castellano, N.N.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Intelligent low cost telecontrol system for agricultural vehicles in harmful environments. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 113, 204–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. AlFaris, F.; Juaidi, A.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Intelligent homes’ technologies to optimize the energy performance for the net zero energy home. Energy Build. 2017, 153, 262–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Salmerón-Manzano, E.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Unaccompanied Minors: Worldwide Research Perspectives. Publications 2019, 7, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Gimenez, E.; Salinas, M.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Worldwide research on plant defense against biotic stresses as improvement for sustainable agriculture. Sustainability 2018, 10, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Salmerón-Manzano, E.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. The role of smart contracts in sustainability: Worldwide research trends. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Wang, L.; Xia, E.; Li, H.; Wang, W. A bibliometric analysis of crowdsourcing in the field of public health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Emmatty, F.J.; Panicker, V.V. Ergonomic interventions among waste collection workers: A systematic review. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2019, 72, 158–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lei, L.; Zhang, Y. Lack of improvement in scientific integrity: An analysis of WoS retractions by Chinese researchers (1997–2016). Sci. Eng. Ethics 2018, 24, 1409–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Doughty, K.; Rothman, L.; Johnston, L.; Le, K.; Wu, J.; Howard, A. Low-income countries’ orthopaedic information needs: Challenges and opportunities. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010, 468, 2598–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Fanga, Y.; Zhengc, T.; Wua, Y.N.; Wanga, Y.; Lia, F. Global trends of coagulation for water and wastewater treatment by utilizing bibliometrics analysis. Desalin. Water Treat. 2019, 151, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bhati, M.; Rai, R. Nanotechnology and water purification: Indian know-how and challenges. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 23423–23435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, J.; Hou, Y.; Wang, P.; Yang, B. A review of carbon capture and storage project investment and operational decision-making based on bibliometrics. Energies 2019, 12, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. de Oliveira, A.O.; Oliveira, H.L.S.; Gomes, C.F.S.; Ribeiro, P.C.C. Quantitative analysis of RFID’publications from 2006 to 2016. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019, 48, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Magro, C.; Mateus, E.P.; Raposo, M.; Ribeiro, A.B. Overview of electronic tongue sensing in environmental aqueous matrices: Potential for monitoring emerging organic contaminants. Environ. Rev. 2019, 27, 202–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Yeo, W.; Kim, S.; Park, H.; Kang, J. A bibliometric method for measuring the degree of technological innovation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2015, 95, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Garrido-Cardenas, J.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F.; González-Cerón, L.; Gil-Montoya, F.; Alcayde-Garcia, A.; Novas, N.; Mesa-Valle, C. The identification of scientific communities and their approach to worldwide malaria research. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Salmerón-Manzano, E.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Worldwide scientific production indexed by Scopus on Labour Relations. Publications 2017, 5, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Salmeron-Manzano, E.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. The electric bicycle: Worldwide research trends. Energies 2018, 11, 1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Garrido-Cardenas, J.A.; Mesa-Valle, C.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Human parasitology worldwide research. Parasitology 2018, 145, 699–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Garrido-Cardenas, J.A.; Mesa-Valle, C.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Trends in plant research using molecular markers. Planta 2018, 247, 543–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. O’regan, B.; Grätzel, M.A. Low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 1991, 353, 737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Priyantha, N.B.; Chakraborty, A.; Balakrishnan, H. The cricket location-support system. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, Boston, MA, USA, 6–11 August 2000; pp. 32–43. [Google Scholar]
  29. Akyildiz, I.F.; Su, W.; Sankarasubramaniam, Y.; Cayirci, E. A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2002, 40, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Bulusu, N.; Heidemann, J.; Estrin, D. GPS-less low-cost outdoor localization for very small devices. IEEE Pers. Commun. 2000, 7, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Lotero, E.; Liu, Y.; Lopez, D.E.; Suwannakarn, K.; Bruce, D.A.; Goodwin, J.G. Synthesis of biodiesel via acid catalysis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 5353–5363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, D.; Müller, M.B.; Gilje, S.; Kaner, R.B.; Wallace, G.G. Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Goodenough, J.B.; Kim, Y. Challenges for rechargeable Li batteries. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 587–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Slater, M.D.; Kim, D.; Lee, E.; Johnson, C.S. Sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 947–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Joachims, T. Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 23–26 July 2002; pp. 133–142. [Google Scholar]
  36. Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 154104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Hashimoto, K.; Irie, H.; Fujishima, A. TiO2 photocatalysis: A historical overview and future prospects. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 44, 8269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Goodenough, J.B.; Kim, Y. Challenges for rechargeable batteries. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 6688–6694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Whittingham, M.S. Lithium batteries and cathode materials. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 4271–4302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wolpaw, J.R.; Birbaumer, N.; McFarland, D.J.; Pfurtscheller, G.; Vaughan, T.M. Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2002, 113, 767–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tice, R.R.; Agurell, E.; Anderson, D.; Burlinson, B.; Hartmann, A.; Kobayashi, H.; Sasaki, Y.F. Single cell gel/comet assay: Guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing. Environ. Mol. Mutagenesis 2000, 35, 206–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Huson, D.H.; Auch, A.F.; Qi, J.; Schuster, S.C. Megan analysis of metagenomic data. Genome Res. 2007, 17, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Wang, J.; Chen, C. Biosorbents for heavy metals removal and their future. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27, 195–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Crini, G. Non-conventional low-cost adsorbents for dye removal: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 1061–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Pan, H.; Hu, Y.S.; Chen, L. Room-temperature stationary sodium-ion batteries for large-scale electric energy storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 2338–2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Garrido-Cardenas, J.A.; Esteban-García, B.; Agüera, A.; Sánchez-Pérez, J.A.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Wastewater treatment by advanced oxidation process and their worldwide research trends. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Montoya, F.G.; Baños, R.; Meroño, J.E.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. The research of water use in Spain. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 4719–4732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Padilla, F.M.; Gallardo, M.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Global trends in nitrate leaching research in the 1960–2017 period. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 643, 400–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Phillips, J.C.; Braun, R.; Wang, W.; Gumbart, J.; Tajkhorshid, E.; Villa, E.; Schulten, K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1781–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Meyer, F.; Paarmann, D.; D’Souza, M.; Olson, R.; Glass, E.M.; Kubal, M.; Wilkening, J. The metagenomics RAST server—A public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Garrido-Cardenas, J.A.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. The metagenomics worldwide research. Curr. Genet. 2017, 63, 819–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Garrido-Cardenas, J.A.; Garcia-Maroto, F.; Alvarez-Bermejo, J.A.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. DNA sequencing sensors: An overview. Sensors 2017, 17, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Usman, M.; Ahmed, U.J.; Javed, M. Agricultural productivity and food security: Role of public and private sector investment in research and development. J. Environ. Agric. Sci. 2017, 12, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  54. Skinner, W. The productivity paradox. Harvard Bus. Rev. 1986, 64, 55–59. [Google Scholar]
  55. Winkler, H.; Spalding-Fecher, R.; Tyani, L.; Matibe, K. Cost-benefit analysis of energy efficiency in urban low-cost housing. Dev. South. Afr. 2002, 19, 593–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Manzano-Agugliaro, F.; Montoya, F.G.; Sabio-Ortega, A.; García-Cruz, A. Review of bioclimatic architecture strategies for achieving thermal comfort. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 49, 736–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cama-Pinto, A.; Gil-Montoya, F.; Gómez-López, J.; García-Cruz, A.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Wireless surveillance sytem for greenhouse crops. Dyna 2014, 81, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Aznar-Sánchez, J.A.; Piquer-Rodríguez, M.; Velasco-Muñoz, J.F.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Worldwide research trends on sustainable land use in agriculture. Land Use Policy 2019, 87, 104069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Manzano-Agugliaro, F.; García-Cruz, A.; Fernández-Sánchez, J.S. Women’s labour and mechanization in mediterranean greenhouse farming. Outlook Agric. 2013, 42, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Methodology.
Figure 1. Methodology.
Inventions 05 00009 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of low-cost publications by scientific categories indexed in Scopus.
Figure 2. Distribution of low-cost publications by scientific categories indexed in Scopus.
Inventions 05 00009 g002
Figure 3. Temporal evolution of low-cost publications by scientific categories indexed in Scopus.
Figure 3. Temporal evolution of low-cost publications by scientific categories indexed in Scopus.
Inventions 05 00009 g003
Figure 4. Distribution by publication type according to the scientific category.
Figure 4. Distribution by publication type according to the scientific category.
Inventions 05 00009 g004
Figure 5. Worldwide research on low cost.
Figure 5. Worldwide research on low cost.
Inventions 05 00009 g005
Figure 6. Distribution by scientific categories according to countries.
Figure 6. Distribution by scientific categories according to countries.
Inventions 05 00009 g006
Figure 7. Distribution of country publications by population (P) and gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD).
Figure 7. Distribution of country publications by population (P) and gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD).
Inventions 05 00009 g007
Table 1. Top 30 countries publications (N) their population (P) in millions of inhabitants and their Gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD) in billions of dollars.
Table 1. Top 30 countries publications (N) their population (P) in millions of inhabitants and their Gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD) in billions of dollars.
Country/TerritoryPublications (N)N (%)PN/PGERDN/GERD
Australia79662.2824.9931921.20376
Belgium27540.7911.4224114.18194
Brazil90352.58209.474339.90226
Canada96832.7737.0626127.18356
China56,18216.051392.7340495.98113
Egypt20680.5998.42216.85302
France10,1592.9066.9915262.95161
Germany13,5613.8782.93164127.11107
Greece24700.7110.732303.40727
Hong Kong30830.887.45414--
India17,9225.121352.621349.75360
Iran45101.2981.8553.321360
Italy12,7803.6560.4321232.47394
Japan12,2883.51126.5397175.8470
Malaysia45491.3031.5314412.41366
Mexico24330.69126.191911.03221
Netherlands40331.1517.2323418.01224
Poland22990.6637.986111.44201
Portugal28860.8210.282814.33667
Saudi Arabia19330.5533.75712.51154
Singapore33250.955.6459011.11299
South Africa19190.5557.78336.09315
South Korea88832.5451.6417289.8399
Spain93422.6746.7220021.37437
Sweden28450.8110.1827916.74170
Switzerland34310.988.5240317.79193
Taiwan72472.0723.11314--
Turkey32650.5482.324020.58159
United Kingdom17,4560.9366.4926347.81365
United States70,5884.99327.17216543.25130
Table 2. Worldwide publications by country on low cost for the top five categories.
Table 2. Worldwide publications by country on low cost for the top five categories.
EngineeringMaterials ScienceComputer SciencePhysics and AstronomyChemistry
1United StatesChinaUnited StatesUnited StatesChina
2ChinaUnited StatesChinaChinaUnited States
3United KingdomIndiaIndiaGermanyIndia
4IndiaJapanUnited KingdomUnited KingdomSouth Korea
5JapanGermanyGermanyJapanUnited Kingdom
6GermanyUnited KingdomItalyIndiaSpain
7ItalySouth KoreaJapanItalyBrazil
8FranceFranceFranceFranceGermany
9South KoreaTaiwanCanadaSouth KoreaJapan
10CanadaItalySpainSpainItaly
11TaiwanSpainTaiwanCanadaIran
12SpainCanadaSouth KoreaTaiwanFrance
13AustraliaAustraliaAustraliaBrazilAustralia
14BrazilBrazilBrazilAustraliaCanada
15MalaysiaSingaporeMalaysiaMalaysiaTaiwan
16NetherlandsHong KongSingaporeSwitzerlandSingapore
17SingaporeMalaysiaPortugalIranHong Kong
18IranIranNetherlandsNetherlandsTurkey
19Hong KongSwitzerlandGreeceSingaporeSaudi Arabia
20SwitzerlandNetherlandsHong KongHong KongMalaysia
Table 3. Worldwide publications by country on low cost por the categories from 6 to 10.
Table 3. Worldwide publications by country on low cost por the categories from 6 to 10.
TitleMedicineChemical EngineeringEnergyEnvironmental ScienceMathematics
1United StatesChinaChinaUnited StatesUnited States
2United KingdomUnited StatesUnited StatesChinaChina
3ItalyIndiaIndiaIndiaGermany
4ChinaSouth KoreaUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited Kingdom
5IndiaUnited KingdomJapanBrazilIndia
6BrazilBrazilGermanyAustraliaItaly
7GermanyGermanySouth KoreaSpainFrance
8CanadaSpainAustraliaItalyJapan
9AustraliaJapanItalyGermanySpain
10FranceItalyCanadaCanadaCanada
11SpainCanadaSpainJapanSouth Korea
12JapanIranBrazilMalaysiaTaiwan
13NetherlandsAustraliaFranceFranceAustralia
14SwitzerlandFranceTaiwanIranBrazil
15IranTaiwanMalaysiaSouth KoreaNetherlands
16TurkeyMalaysiaIranTurkeyBelgium
17BelgiumSingaporeTurkeyNetherlandsPoland
18MexicoTurkeySingaporeTaiwanMalaysia
19SwedenSaudi ArabiaHong KongSwedenSwitzerland
20South KoreaPortugalSwedenGreeceSingapore
Table 4. Worldwide publications by affiliation/university on low cost for the top three categories.
Table 4. Worldwide publications by affiliation/university on low cost for the top three categories.
EngineeringMaterials ScienceComputer Science
1Chinese Academy of SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesChinese Academy of Sciences
2Ministry of Education ChinaMinistry of Education ChinaTsinghua University
3Georgia Institute of TechnologyTsinghua UniversityGeorgia Institute of Technology
4Tsinghua UniversityUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesMinistry of Education China
5IEEEGeorgia Institute of TechnologyCNRS Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
6CNRS Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyNanyang Technological University
7Zhejiang UniversityCNRS Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMassachusetts Institute of Technology
8Nanyang Technological UniversityNanyang Technological UniversityHuazhong University of Science and Technology
9Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyZhejiang UniversityCarnegie Mellon University
10Harbin Institute of TechnologyUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaIEEE
11Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyHarbin Institute of TechnologyZhejiang University
12Southeast UniversityShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor
13Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityPeking UniversityBeihang University
14University of Chinese Academy of SciencesSouth China University of TechnologyShanghai Jiao Tong University
15Beihang UniversityConsiglio Nazionale delle RicercheBeijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
16National Taiwan UniversitySoochow UniversityPolitecnico di Torino
17University of California, BerkeleyNational University of SingaporeHarbin Institute of Technology
18National Cheng Kung UniversityJilin UniversityConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
19Politecnico di TorinoTianjin UniversityStanford University
20University of Michigan, Ann ArborCentral South University ChinaETH Zürich
Table 5. Worldwide publications by affiliation/university on low cost for the categories from 4 to 5.
Table 5. Worldwide publications by affiliation/university on low cost for the categories from 4 to 5.
Physics and AstronomyChemistry
1Chinese Academy of SciencesChinese Academy of Sciences
2Ministry of Education ChinaMinistry of Education China
3CNRS Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences
4Tsinghua UniversityTsinghua University
5University of Chinese Academy of SciencesZhejiang University
6Consiglio Nazionale delle RicercheCNRS Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
7Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyUniversity of Science and Technology of China
8Georgia Institute of TechnologyJilin University
9Nanyang Technological UniversitySouth China University of Technology
10Zhejiang UniversityNanyang Technological University
11Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyNanjing University
12Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityPeking University
13Harbin Institute of TechnologyWuhan University
14University of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaHuazhong University of Science and Technology
15Beihang UniversityHarbin Institute of Technology
16IEEEUniversidade de Sao Paulo - USP
17University of Science and Technology of ChinaSichuan University
18University of CambridgeSoochow University
19Tianjin UniversityConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
20University of California, BerkeleyShanghai Jiao Tong University
Table 6. Worldwide publications by affiliation/university on low cost for the categories from 6 to 8.
Table 6. Worldwide publications by affiliation/university on low cost for the categories from 6 to 8.
MedicineChemical EngineeringEnergy
1Harvard Medical SchoolChinese Academy of SciencesChinese Academy of Sciences
2Universidade de Sao Paulo - USPMinistry of Education ChinaMinistry of Education China
3University of Washington, SeattleUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesTsinghua University
4University of California, San FranciscoTsinghua UniversityUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences
5UCLSouth China University of TechnologyHuazhong University of Science and Technology
6London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineCNRS Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueZhejiang University
7University of TorontoZhejiang UniversityGeorgia Institute of Technology
8InsermBeijing University of Chemical TechnologyUniversity of Science and Technology of China
9University of Michigan, Ann ArborUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaNational Renewable Energy Laboratory
10Johns Hopkins UniversityNanyang Technological UniversityNanyang Technological University
11University of California, Los AngelesJilin UniversitySouth China University of Technology
12VA Medical CenterHarbin Institute of TechnologyShanghai Jiao Tong University
13Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthDalian University of TechnologyMassachusetts Institute of Technology
14Brigham and Women’s HospitalTianjin UniversityUniversity of New South Wales UNSW Australia
15Massachusetts General HospitalShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityCNRS Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
16University of OxfordNational University of SingaporeUniversity of Texas at Austin
17Centers for Disease Control and PreventionSichuan UniversityXi’an Jiaotong University
18University of PennsylvaniaCentral South University ChinaHarbin Institute of Technology
19Stanford UniversityPeking UniversityOak Ridge National Laboratory
20The University of North Carolina at Chapel HillNanjing UniversityDalian University of Technology
Table 7. Worldwide publications by affiliation/university on low cost for the categories from 9 to 10.
Table 7. Worldwide publications by affiliation/university on low cost for the categories from 9 to 10.
Environmental ScienceMathematics
1Ministry of Education ChinaChinese Academy of Sciences
2Chinese Academy of SciencesTsinghua University
3Tsinghua UniversityMinistry of Education China
4University of Chinese Academy of SciencesCNRS Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
5Universidade de Sao Paulo - USPZhejiang University
6CNRS Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
7Harbin Institute of TechnologyHuazhong University of Science and Technology
8Universiti Sains MalaysiaBeihang University
9United States Environmental Protection AgencyMassachusetts Institute of Technology
10Zhejiang UniversityHarbin Institute of Technology
11South China University of TechnologyGeorgia Institute of Technology
12Universiti Putra MalaysiaUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor
13University of FloridaNanyang Technological University
14Nanjing UniversityCalifornia Institute of Technology
15University of California, BerkeleyUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences
16Consiglio Nazionale delle RicercheShanghai Jiao Tong University
17Hunan UniversityBeijing Institute of Technology
18Shandong UniversityJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
19Stanford UniversityPeking University
20The University of North Carolina at Chapel HillNanjing University
Table 8. Worldwide publications by affiliation/university on low cost for the categories from 1 to 3.
Table 8. Worldwide publications by affiliation/university on low cost for the categories from 1 to 3.
EngineeringMaterials ScienceComputer Science
SensorsSolar CellsAlgorithms
Cost EffectivenessElectrodesSensors
AlgorithmsSubstratesWireless Telecommunication Systems
Computer SimulationScanning Electron MicroscopySignal Processing
SubstratesThin FilmsWireless Sensor Networks
OptimizationCost EffectivenessRobotics
Wireless Telecommunication SystemsNanoparticlesCost Effectiveness
Signal ProcessingFabricationCameras
DesignX Ray DiffractionComputer Simulation
ElectrodesPolymersImage Processing
CMOS Integrated CircuitsGrapheneOptimization
Solar CellsSensorsEmbedded Systems
BandwidthSiliconDesign
AntennasCarbonHardware
FabricationMechanical PropertiesGlobal Positioning System
ManufactureSynthesis (chemical)Internet Of Things
Scanning Electron MicroscopyEfficiencyAntennas
Thin FilmsTemperatureComputer Vision
RoboticsNanostructured MaterialsArtificial Intelligence
Mathematical ModelsFibersVirtual Reality
Table 9. Keywords on low cost research for the categories from 4 to 6.
Table 9. Keywords on low cost research for the categories from 4 to 6.
Physics and AstronomyChemistryMedicine
SensorsElectrodesFemale
SubstratesAdsorptionMale
Thin FilmsScanning Electron MicroscopyAdult
Scanning Electron MicroscopyCarbonHealth Care Cost
Solar CellsNanoparticlesMajor Clinical Study
Cost EffectivenessControlled StudyAged
ElectrodesGrapheneMiddle Aged
Optical FibersUnclassified DrugProcedures
FabricationSolar CellsNonhuman
SiliconX Ray DiffractionMethodology
NanoparticlesLimit Of DetectionAdolescent
X Ray DiffractionProceduresEconomics
FibersCatalystsHealth Care Cost
PolymersIonsClinical Article
Refractive IndexSynthesis (chemicalChild
Signal ProcessingElectrolytesTreatment Outcome
Light Emitting DiodesCatalyst ActivitySensitivity And Specificity
Optical CommunicationElectrocatalystsCost Effectiveness Analysis
BandwidthCatalysisCost Benefit Analysis
EfficiencyTemperatureClinical Trial
Table 10. Keywords on low cost research for the categories 7 and 8.
Table 10. Keywords on low cost research for the categories 7 and 8.
Chemical EngineeringEnergy
AdsorptionSolar Cells
Scanning Electron MicroscopyElectrodes
ElectrodesCarbon
CarbonCost Effectiveness
NonhumanEnergy Efficiency
Controlled StudySolar Energy
ChemistryEfficiency
NanoparticlesCarbon Dioxide
CatalystsElectrolytes
X Ray DiffractionEnergy Conversion
Unclassified DrugCathodes
Catalyst ActivityCatalysts
GrapheneSecondary Batteries
TemperatureSolar Power Generation
CatalysisElectric Batteries
OxygenBiomass
Particle SizeOptimization
Synthesis (chemical)Fuel Cells
HumanElectrocatalysts
SynthesisPower Electronics
Table 11. Keywords on low cost research for the categories 9 and 10.
Table 11. Keywords on low cost research for the categories 9 and 10.
Environmental ScienceMathematics
AdsorptionSensors
PHAlgorithms
Wastewater TreatmentComputer Simulation
ChemistryCost Effectiveness
Pollutant RemovalOptimization
Controlled StudyCameras
Water TreatmentDesign
Aqueous SolutionRobotics
WastewaterImage Processing
KineticsSignal Processing
BiomassOptical Fibers
CarbonWireless Telecommunication Systems
Water Pollutants, ChemicalComputer Vision
IsothermArtificial Intelligence
Reaction KineticsWireless Sensor Networks
TemperatureHardware
Concentration (composition)Mirrors
ProceduresEmbedded Systems
Scanning Electron MicroscopyMathematical Models
Waste Water ManagementBandwidth

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Salmerón-Manzano, E.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Worldwide Research on Low Cost Technologies through Bibliometric Analysis. Inventions 2020, 5, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions5010009

AMA Style

Salmerón-Manzano E, Manzano-Agugliaro F. Worldwide Research on Low Cost Technologies through Bibliometric Analysis. Inventions. 2020; 5(1):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions5010009

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salmerón-Manzano, Esther, and Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro. 2020. "Worldwide Research on Low Cost Technologies through Bibliometric Analysis" Inventions 5, no. 1: 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions5010009

APA Style

Salmerón-Manzano, E., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2020). Worldwide Research on Low Cost Technologies through Bibliometric Analysis. Inventions, 5(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions5010009

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop