Performance Study of Virtual Frisch Grid CdZnTeSe Detectors
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The paper is presenting the interesting work on the production of radiation detectors using CdZnTeSe. The performance of the detectors is impressive and demonstrates the successful working in the growth of CZTS crystals.
Author Response
The authors would like to thank the reviewers for valuable comments/suggestions. We have addressed all the comments, and the manuscript is enriched after the revision as suggested by the reviewers.
Reviewer #1.
Open Review
( ) I would not like to sign my review report
(x) I would like to sign my review report
English language and style
( ) Extensive editing of English language and style required
( ) Moderate English changes required
(x) English language and style are fine/minor spell check required
( ) I don't feel qualified to judge about the English language and style
|
Yes |
Can be improved |
Must be improved |
Not applicable |
|
|
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references? |
(x) |
( ) |
( ) |
( ) |
|
Are all the cited references relevant to the research? |
(x) |
( ) |
( ) |
( ) |
|
Is the research design appropriate? |
(x) |
( ) |
( ) |
( ) |
|
Are the methods adequately described? |
(x) |
( ) |
( ) |
( ) |
|
Are the results clearly presented? |
(x) |
( ) |
( ) |
( ) |
|
Are the conclusions supported by the results? |
(x) |
( ) |
( ) |
( ) |
Comments and Suggestions for Authors
The paper is presenting the interesting work on the production of radiation detectors using CdZnTeSe. The performance of the detectors is impressive and demonstrates the successful working in the growth of CZTS crystals.
Thank you.
Submission Date
30 August 2022
Date of this review
Reviewer 2 Report
The manuscript reports the results of a study of the detector performance of an as-grown CZT crystal. Results are interesting; the entire manuscript is organized well with substantiated results and discussion. I feel that the manuscript may be accepted for publication after addressing the following queries.
1. How the composition of CZTS was optimized?. Some more details would have been much better.
2. Detector fabrication details may be more elaborated.
3. Etching details like proportion ratio and its impact could have been discussed.
Author Response
The authors would like to thank the reviewers for valuable comments/suggestions. We have addressed all the comments, and the manuscript is enriched after the revision as suggested by the reviewers.
Reviewer# 2.
Open Review
(x) I would not like to sign my review report
( ) I would like to sign my review report
English language and style
( ) Extensive editing of English language and style required
( ) Moderate English changes required
(x) English language and style are fine/minor spell check required
( ) I don't feel qualified to judge about the English language and style
|
Yes |
Can be improved |
Must be improved |
Not applicable |
|
|
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references? |
( ) |
(x) |
( ) |
( ) |
|
Are all the cited references relevant to the research? |
(x) |
( ) |
( ) |
( ) |
|
Is the research design appropriate? |
( ) |
(x) |
( ) |
( ) |
|
Are the methods adequately described? |
( ) |
(x) |
( ) |
( ) |
|
Are the results clearly presented? |
( ) |
(x) |
( ) |
( ) |
|
Are the conclusions supported by the results? |
( ) |
(x) |
( ) |
( ) |
Comments and Suggestions for Authors
The manuscript reports the results of a study of the detector performance of an as-grown CZT crystal. Results are interesting; the entire manuscript is organized well with substantiated results and discussion. I feel that the manuscript may be accepted for publication after addressing the following queries.
- How the composition of CZTS was optimized?. Some more details would have been much better.
Details have been provided on page #2.
- Detector fabrication details may be more elaborated.
Detector fabrication and measurement has been provided on page # 3.
- Etching details like proportion ratio and its impact could have been discussed.
Provided on page # 3.
Submission Date
30 August 2022
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
