Next Article in Journal
Chestnut Shell Extract Modulates Immune Parameters in the Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss
Previous Article in Journal
Transcriptomic Changes during Previtellogenic and Vitellogenic Stages of Ovarian Development in Wreckfish (Hāpuku), Polyprion oxygeneios (Perciformes)
Article Menu
Issue 1 (March) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessCommunication

Report on the Short-Term Scavenging of Decomposing Native and Non-Native Trout in Appalachian Streams

1,*,† and 2,†
1
Biology Department, Bridges Science Building, Wingate University, Wingate, NC 29174, USA
2
Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, Fisheries and Wildlife Management PO BOX 1747, Cherokee, NC 28719, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Authors contributed equally to this work.
Fishes 2019, 4(1), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes4010017
Received: 4 February 2019 / Revised: 22 February 2019 / Accepted: 25 February 2019 / Published: 1 March 2019
  |  
PDF [1804 KB, uploaded 1 March 2019]
  |  

Abstract

Trout fishing is one of the primary recreational activities in the southern Appalachians, with large amounts of fish stocked on a regular basis. However, very little is known regarding the fate of hatchery reared carcasses not captured by anglers, representing a likely important ecological resource to local communities. We tested the efficacy of underwater video to characterize short term decomposition and consumption by aquatic scavengers of native brook and non-native rainbow trout, Salvelinus fontinalis and Oncorhychus mykiss. This study took place on the Cherokee Qualla Boundary in North Carolina, a location with one of the highest riverine stocked trout densities in the eastern United States. During May 2017, 10 waterproof cameras were deployed for 1-hour intervals on each carcass twice daily for a period of 5 days. We observed that 75.3% of recorded video contained river chub, Nocomis micropogon, with only 24.7% visited by crayfish, with a maximum of 9 and a mean of 1.93 for N. micropogon. Half of the carcasses were removed within 2 days. Based on natural history evidence and some trail cameras, we believe that otters were removing carcasses. Otters showed no preference for either trout species. Underwater video allowed us to characterize initial decomposition within stream diurnal scavengers in a short period using a visual, non-destructive low-cost method. Future studies should monitor large mammalian scavengers to further elucidate the role of fish stocking on aquatic communities. View Full-Text
Keywords: trout decomposition; scavenging ecology; remote underwater video; stream ecosystems; hatchery releases trout decomposition; scavenging ecology; remote underwater video; stream ecosystems; hatchery releases
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Unger, S.; Hickman, C. Report on the Short-Term Scavenging of Decomposing Native and Non-Native Trout in Appalachian Streams. Fishes 2019, 4, 17.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Fishes EISSN 2410-3888 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top