Next Article in Journal
Mediality, Temporality, Social Cognition, and Evolution
Previous Article in Journal
Redefining Sustainability: From Self-Determination to Environmental Autonomy
Open AccessArticle

Should Parents Design Their Children’s Genome: Some General Arguments and a Confucian Solution

1,2,* and 1
1
School of Philosophy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2
Beijing Normal University-Hong Kong Baptist University United International College, Zhuhai 519087, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Philosophies 2019, 4(3), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies4030043
Received: 19 May 2019 / Revised: 14 July 2019 / Accepted: 23 July 2019 / Published: 30 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Philosophy and the Ethics of Technology)
  |  
PDF [188 KB, uploaded 30 July 2019]

Abstract

With the emergence of clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) as one of the most promising new gene-editing techniques, scientists are now endeavoring to apply it to various domains. Among all the possible applications, gene editing in human embryos has received the most attention. Against this background, this article carries out a philosophical study on the ethical problems of human embryo gene editing or designing. Arguments against human embryo gene designing include that parents should be prohibited from deciding their children’s future; commodifying children should be prohibited; the natural reproductive process should not be disturbed; and human embryo gene designing might foster discrimination. Arguments for human embryo gene designing include that parents should have the freedom to design their own babies and this freedom should not be limited; designing babies can promote the happy life of the baby; and totally forbidding embryo gene editing would drive the practice underground, where it would be performed illegally. This article analyzes all of these arguments and points out that all of them have some flaws. In order to draw a thoughtful conclusion, we turn to Confucianism and find a new perspective to determine whether designing babies with CRISPR technology is ethically permissible. View Full-Text
Keywords: CRISPR; genetic enhancement; embryonic genetic designing; bioethics; Confucianism CRISPR; genetic enhancement; embryonic genetic designing; bioethics; Confucianism
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J.; Zhang, X. Should Parents Design Their Children’s Genome: Some General Arguments and a Confucian Solution. Philosophies 2019, 4, 43.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Philosophies EISSN 2409-9287 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top