Next Article in Journal
Plenty of Fish in the Academy: On Marshall McLuhan’s Prose as an Anti-Environment
Next Article in Special Issue
The Process of Evolution, Human Enhancement Technology, and Cyborgs
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Computational Explanatory Gap
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cyborgs and Enhancement Technology

Law, Cyborgs, and Technologically Enhanced Brains

Professor Emeritus, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA
140 BPW Club Rd, Apt E16, Carrboro, NC 27510, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Jordi Vallverdú
Philosophies 2017, 2(1), 6;
Received: 12 October 2016 / Revised: 16 January 2017 / Accepted: 8 February 2017 / Published: 17 February 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Enhancement Technologies and Our Merger with Machines)
As we become more and more enhanced with cyborg technology, significant issues of law and policy are raised. For example, as cyborg devices implanted within the body create a class of people with enhanced motor and computational abilities, how should the law and policy respond when the abilities of such people surpass those of the general population? And what basic human and legal rights should be afforded to people equipped with cyborg technology as they become more machine and less biology? As other issues of importance, if a neuroprosthetic device is accessed by a third party and done to edit one’s memory or to plant a new memory in one’s mind, or even to place an ad for a commercial product in one’s consciousness, should there be a law of cognitive liberty or of “neuro-advertising” that applies? This paper discusses laws and statutes enacted across several jurisdictions which apply to cyborg technologies with a particular emphasis on legal doctrine which relates to neuroprosthetic devices. View Full-Text
Keywords: cyborg; enhancement technology; neuroprosthesis; patent law; copyright law; cognitive liberty; international law cyborg; enhancement technology; neuroprosthesis; patent law; copyright law; cognitive liberty; international law
Show Figures

MDPI and ACS Style

Barfield, W.; Williams, A. Law, Cyborgs, and Technologically Enhanced Brains. Philosophies 2017, 2, 6.

AMA Style

Barfield W, Williams A. Law, Cyborgs, and Technologically Enhanced Brains. Philosophies. 2017; 2(1):6.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barfield, Woodrow, and Alexander Williams. 2017. "Law, Cyborgs, and Technologically Enhanced Brains" Philosophies 2, no. 1: 6.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop