Next Article in Journal
Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Activity: Analytical Methods and Current Knowledge—A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Loading Strategy on Methylene Blue Encapsulation in Ethosomes: A Comparative Study of Aqueous and Ethanol Phases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Protocol

A Simple and Fast Protocol to Detect Nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) Mutation and Fms-like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Internal Tandem Duplication (FLT3/ITD): Optimizing Laboratory Routine

by
Alessandra Helena da Silva Hellwig
1,2,†,
Gisele Menezes Ewald
3,†,
Grazielle Motta Rodrigues
1,2,†,
William Latosinski Matos
1,2,†,
Juliana Bergmann
4,†,
Viviane Horn de Melo
4,†,
Rodrigo Minuto Paiva
4,†,
Dariane Castro Pereira
1,4,*,† and
Eduardo Wandame Gomez
1,4,†
1
Residência Multidisciplinar em Área Profissional Análises Clínicas, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90035-903, Brazil
2
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Ciências Médicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90035-903, Brazil
3
Unidade de Imunologia de Transplantes e Medicina Personalizada, Serviço de Diagnóstico Laboratorial, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90035-903, Brazil
4
Unidade de Microbiologia, Setor de Biologia Molecular, Serviço de Diagnóstico Laboratorial, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90035-903, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Methods Protoc. 2026, 9(2), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/mps9020059
Submission received: 16 December 2025 / Revised: 11 February 2026 / Accepted: 28 February 2026 / Published: 3 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Cellular Biology)

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous hematologic malignancy. AML classification is currently based on cytogenetic and molecular alterations as well as immunophenotyping, although risk stratification still relies primarily on cytogenetic findings. However, approximately 45% of AML patients present with a normal karyotype, which makes accurate risk classification and treatment stratification more challenging. Therefore, the identification of molecular prognostic markers described in the literature has become essential in routine diagnostic laboratories, enabling the more precise categorization of patients into risk groups. In this study, we present a simple, rapid, step-by-step multiplex PCR protocol combined with capillary electrophoresis for the detection of two of the most prevalent molecular alterations in AML: nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) mutations and Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplications (FLT3/ITD). This protocol provides a practical workflow that can assist diagnostic laboratories in implementing and optimizing multiplex mutation detection in routine practice.

1. Introduction

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a clinically heterogeneous hematologic malignancy [1,2,3,4], both in biological and morphological aspects [2,3], despite the relatively low number of genomic alterations when compared to other cancers [4]. The karyotype of patients with AML is widely studied; however, this isolated analysis does not provide sufficient information for prognostic stratification, since approximately 45% of AML patients present with a normal karyotype, requiring additional molecular analyses [2,3].
AML is characterized by a complex molecular landscape involving recurrent mutations in genes such as NPM1, FLT3, TP53, ASXL1, DNMT3A and IDH1/2, which play important roles in prognosis, risk stratification and therapeutic decision making [5]. The gene responsible for the synthesis of nucleophosmin (NPM) is highly conserved among humans [4]. It is located on chromosome 5q35 and is composed of 12 exons [2,3,4,5,6]. NPM1 is a protein that resides in the nucleolus under normal physiological conditions, but continuously shuttles between the nucleus and the cytoplasm [2,3,4,6]. NPM1 is a multifunctional protein [2] directly involved in the regulation and stability of nuclear proteins [3], playing an important role in the cell cycle and participating in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair processes [2,6].
Mutations in the NPM1 gene are found in around 45–55% of AML patients with a normal karyotype and typically consist of the insertion of four nucleotides in exon 12 [1,3,7], causing the abnormal localization of the NPM1 protein in the cytoplasm [3,8]. These mutations are classified from types A to F; however, type A mutations are the most prevalent, occurring in approximately 75–80% of cases, followed by other variants such as types B and D [2,6,8].
Another important gene involved in AML pathogenesis is Fms-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3), located on chromosome 13q12 [2,3]. This gene encodes a receptor with tyrosine kinase activity associated with cell signaling pathways [3,9], which, when activated, leads to increased proliferation and the inhibition of apoptosis [2]. Mutations in this gene result in structural changes in the FLT3 receptor, producing a constitutively active receptor that promotes the uncontrolled proliferation of myeloid cells [2]. FLT3 mutations may occur as point mutations or internal tandem duplications (ITD), the latter being among the most frequent mutations in AML (approximately 35–45%) and typically involving exons 14 or 15 [2,3]. FLT3/ITD mutations consist of duplications of DNA sequences that can range from 3 to more than 400 base pairs, most commonly occurring as in-frame insertions (multiples of three nucleotides) [10,11].
From a prognostic perspective, genetic mutations serve as important molecular markers in the diagnostic routine for AML patients. For example, NPM1 mutation in the presence of normal cytogenetics is associated with favorable prognosis, whereas FLT3/ITD is associated with adverse prognosis (intermediate risk irrespective of the allelic ratio or presence of NPM1 mutation) [12].
Accurate AML diagnosis requires the integration of clinical, biological, cytogenetic, immunophenotypic and molecular data [1,2]. Therefore, the detection of mutations in the FLT3 and NPM1 genes has become an essential component of routine molecular diagnostics, providing important information related to the relapse risk, treatment response and disease-free survival [1,2,9,12,13].
Although fragment analysis for the detection of NPM1 exon 12 insertions and FLT3/ITD mutations is already well established in molecular hematology laboratories, the implementation of multiplex workflows often relies on locally adapted procedures. The aim of this work is not to introduce a new detection method, but to provide a simple, reproducible and implementation-oriented protocol that facilitates workflow standardization, training and routine molecular diagnostic testing in AML. Here, we present a simple, rapid and cost-effective multiplex protocol for the detection of the most prevalent NPM1 mutations (types A, B and D) and FLT3/ITD, enabling the implementation and optimization of laboratory routines using multiplex PCR and capillary electrophoresis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design

The assay described here for detection of NPM1 mutations (types A, B and D) and FLT3/ITD in AML samples is currently implemented in our laboratory routine. FLT3 point mutations, including tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) mutations, are not detected by this method. A schematic overview of the workflow is presented in Figure 1. The protocol consists of four main steps: genomic DNA extraction from whole blood or bone marrow samples, amplification of target regions by conventional PCR, capillary electrophoresis using a genetic analyzer and fragment analysis for mutation detection.
One important limiting factor of this technique is the proportion of leukemic blasts present in the biological sample, since higher blast percentages generally increase the sensitivity of mutation detection. Although a specific blast-percentage cutoff is no longer required for AML with defined genetic abnormalities [12], during protocol implementation, mutation detection was successfully achieved in a specimen containing approximately 8% blasts.
As this protocol relies on PCR amplification followed by fragment analysis, the method is optimized for insertions that produce measurable size differences relative to the wild-type amplicon. Rare or atypical variants—such as uncommon insertion sizes, complex insertions or deletions or variants outside the amplified region—may not be detected by fragment analysis alone and complementary molecular methods may be required when atypical electropherogram patterns are observed. This approach is intended primarily for mutation detection and risk stratification, whereas minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring requires higher-sensitivity methodologies, such as quantitative PCR or sequencing-based approaches [5].
A summary of the analytical validation performed in our laboratory, including sample distribution, specificity, concordance and precision, is provided as Supplementary Materials. However, laboratories implementing this in-house assay are expected to perform their own validation according to local regulatory and accreditation requirements.

2.2. Materials

Please note, all supplies and reagents used should be DNA- and RNA-free.

2.2.1. Genomic DNA Extraction

  • Maxwell® RSC Blood DNA Kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA; Cat. no.: AS1400);
  • Pipettes and sterile tips;
  • Eppendorf tubes 1.5 and 2 mL.

2.2.2. Polymerase Chain Reaction

  • Primer mix (forward and reverse) for detection of NPM1 mutations (Table 1);
  • Primer mix (forward and reverse) for detection of FLT3/ITD mutations (Table 1);
3.
Taq DNA Polymerase 5 U/μL 500 U, buffer 10× and MgCl2 50 mM (Ludwig Biotecnologia, Alvorada, RS, Brazil; Cat. no.: 35);
4.
Eppendorf tubes 0.2 mL;
5.
Nuclease-free water for molecular biology;
6.
dNTP set 100 mM (QuatroG Biotecnologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Cat. no.: 100016).

2.2.3. Fragment Analysis

  • Hi-Di™ Formamide (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA; Cat. no.: 4440753);
  • POP-7™ Polymer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA; Cat. no.: 4393708);
  • GeneScan™ 500 ROX™ Size Standard (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA; Cat. no.: 4393708);
  • DS-30 Matrix Standard kit Dye set D (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA; Cat. no.: 4345827);
  • Axygen® 96 well-polypropylene PCR microplate compatible with ABI (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA; Cat. no.: PCR-96-AB-C).

2.3. Equipment

  • Maxwell® RSC Instrument (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA; Cat. no.: AS4500);
  • NanoDrop™ 2000 Spectrophotometers (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA; Cat. no.: ND-2000);
  • Benchtop vortex mixer;
  • Heating block set at 56 °C;
  • Rotating tube mixer for liquid blood samples (optional);
  • Veriti Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA; Cat. no.: 4413964);
  • 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA; Cat. no.: 4405673);
  • Software for fragment analysis.

3. Procedure

3.1. Genomic DNA (gDNA) Extraction

Fresh or frozen whole blood or bone marrow samples collected in EDTA tubes were used for gDNA extraction using the commercial kit, Maxwell® RSC Blood DNA Kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA; Cat. no.: AS1400), and the equipment Maxwell® RSC Instrument (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA; Cat. no.: AS4500). The instructions for use provided by the manufacturer were used. Briefly:
  • Before starting:
    • Heat the heat block to 56 °C for use in step 7;
    • Prepare 1.5 mL eppendorf tubes for each sample for use in step 3.
  • Mix all blood samples by gently inverting 8 to 10 times for at least 5 min at room temperature;
  • Add 300 μL of liquid blood to each 1.5 mL eppendorf tube;
  • Add 300 μL of lysis buffer to each 1.5 mL eppendorf tube;
  • Add 30 μL of proteinase K solution to each 1.5 mL eppendorf tube;
  • Vortex each tube for 10 s;
  • Incubate each tube in the heating block at 56 °C for 20 min.
OPTIONAL STEP: during the incubation, the Maxwell® RSC Instrument may be prepared for the run according to the manufacturer’s instructions—select the method (RSC Blood DNA) and the positions that will be used in the extraction run and enter the sample tracking information.
8.
After the incubation, transfer all the lysate blood sample to each cartridge into the prober well and place the plunger, as described by the manufacturer;
9.
Place an empty elution tube (0.5 mL) into each cartridge at the deck tray;
10.
Add 50 μL of Elution Buffer of each elution tube;
11.
Insert the deck tray properly into the Maxwell® RSC Instrument;
12.
Before starting the extraction run, make sure that all elution tubes are open and all cartridges have a plunger;
13.
After checking, the extraction run can begin: touch the Start button. The platform will retract and the door will close. This extraction run takes ≌40 min to finish;
14.
After the extraction run has ended, discard all the cartridges and plungers properly and keep with the elution tubes containing the extracted gDNA;
15.
Centrifuge the elution tubes at 12,000× g for 5 min;
16.
In a new 1.5 mL eppendorf tube properly identified, transfer the supernatant.
Mps 09 00059 i001 CRITICAL STEP: be careful to transfer the supernatant gently in a way that all the paramagnetic particles are not disturbed after centrifugal separation.
17.
Proceed with the quantification of gDNA using the NanoDrop™ 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA; Cat. no.: ND-2000);
18.
In a new 1.5 mL eppendorf tube, standardize all the gDNA to 5 ng/μL (A260/A280: 1.7–2.0) and store the pure gDNA at −20 °C.
Mps 09 00059 i002 PAUSE STEP: after ending the gDNA quantification, the diluted gDNA can be stored at 4 °C (if the PCR will be performed within 24 h) or −20 °C for long periods.

3.2. Amplification of the Target (Conventional PCR)

This step amplifies molecular targets relevant to AML diagnosis and risk stratification [3,11,12]. For the NPM1 gene, amplification targets exon 12, where the most prevalent mutations (types A, B and D) occur [13]. For internal tandem duplication in the FLT3 gene, amplification targets exons 14 and 15 [14,15].
  • Before starting:
    • If gDNA samples are stored at −20 °C, they can thaw in the refrigerator (≌4 °C) while the mix is being prepared;
    • Prepare 0.2 mL eppendorf tubes for each gDNA sample for use in step 5;
    • Prepare 1.5 mL eppendorf tube to prepare the mix for use in step 3;
    • The reagents that will be used to prepare the PCR mix (Table 2) must be thawed at room temperature before pipetting (except Taq DNA polymerase: remove from the freezer only when pipetting it).
  • Vortex for 5 s and spin all the components from Table 2 (except Taq DNA polymerase).
Mps 09 00059 i001 CRITICAL STEP: Taq DNA polymerase must be mixed gently. Pipette “up and down” a few times may be used to mix.
3.
Pipette the reagents in a new 1.5 mL eppendorf tube according to the number of gDNA samples for which PCR will be performed. Table 2 contains the components required for the PCR mix as the volumes (μL) for one reaction. Example: if you have three samples, you will need to multiply all the volumes by three.
OPTIONAL STEP: It is important to know if the PCR reaction is occurring as desired and to confirm there is no contamination during the process. It is highly recommended to implement a negative and positive control reaction always when a new mix is completed. Water for molecular biology may be used as a negative control and a sample known to be positive for FLT3/ITD and NPM1 mutations as a positive control.
4.
Vortex for 5 s and spin the mix prepared;
5.
Add 45 μL of the mix in each 0.2 mL eppendorf tube;
6.
Add 5 μL of gDNA samples (5 ng/μL) into 0.2 mL eppendorf tubes with the mix, resulting in a final volume of 50 μL.
OPTIONAL STEP: the same volume of 5 μL is used for the negative and positive controls.
7.
Vortex for 5 s and spin each 0.2 mL eppendorf tube;
8.
Place the tubes in the thermocycler with the cycle described (Table 3). This PCR takes ≌100 min to finish.
Table 3. PCR cycle used for target amplification.
Table 3. PCR cycle used for target amplification.
TemperatureTimeCycles
Initial denaturation95 °C10 min1
Denaturation95 °C30 s35
Annealing55 °C30 s
Extension72 °C30 s
Final extension72 °C10 min1
Hold4 °C -
Mps 09 00059 i002 PAUSE STEP: after ending the PCR, the eppendorf tubes containing the PCR product can be stored protected from light at 4 °C (if the PCR will be performed within 24 h) or −20 °C for long periods.

3.3. Capillary Electrophoresis

PCR amplification was performed using fluorescently labeled forward primers and unlabeled reverse primers: fluorescein dye (FAM) for FLT3/ITD and hexachlorofluorescein dye (HEX) for NPM1. In this step, the amplicons will be separated by size using a 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA; Cat. no.: 4405673) with DS-30 Matrix Standard kit dye set D (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA; Cat. no.: 4345827) and POP-7™ Polymer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA; Cat. no.: 4393708). GeneScan™ 500 ROX™ Size Standard will be used.
  • Before starting:
    • If PCR products are stored at −20 °C, they can thaw in the refrigerator (≌4 °C) while the mix is being prepared;
    • Prepare the 1.5 mL eppendorf tube to prepare the mix for use in step 3;
    • Prepare the 96-well microplate compatible with the 3500 Genetic Analyzer for use in step 5;
    • Thaw Hi-Di™ Formamide (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA; Cat. no.: 4440753) at room temperature before pipetting;
    • OPTIONAL STEP: start pre-heating (60 °C) the oven for the 3500 Genetic Analyzer.
  • Briefly vortex and spin the reagents from Table 4;
  • In an empty 1.5 mL eppendorf tube, pipette the reagents from Table 4 according to the number of samples. Example: if you have three samples you will need to multiply all the volumes by three.
4.
Vortex for 5 s and spin the mix prepared;
5.
In a 96-well microplate, pipette 9.6 μL of the mix in each well for each sample.
Mps 09 00059 i001 CRITICAL STEP: the 3500 Genetic Analyzer with eight capillaries does the electrophoresis of one column (eight wells) per injection. The pipetting order on the microplate should follow the column order. Example: A1, B1, C1, D1, etc.
6.
Add 0.7 μL of the PCR product in the well containing the mix, resulting in a final volume of 10.3 μL per reaction;
7.
Pipette “up and down” a few times with a multichannel pipette to homogenize;
8.
If the last pipetted column has any empty well, complete it with 10.3 μL of Hi-Di™ Formamide. Every column where electrophoresis will be carried out must not have any empty well.
9.
Seal the microplate with septa;
10.
Briefly centrifuge the microplate to not leave any contents on the well wall;
11.
Incubate the microplate for 3 min at 95 °C to denature the DNA fragments;
12.
Immediately place the microplate on ice for ≥2 min.
OPTIONAL STEP: during step 12, the set-up of the electrophoresis run may be completed with the 3500 Genetic Analyzer.
13.
Briefly centrifuge the microplate;
14.
Place the microplate in the 3500 Genetic Analyzer and start the electrophoresis. Information about the electrophoresis instrument protocol to use in this technique is listed in Table 5.
Table 5. Parameters to use in capillary electrophoresis.
Table 5. Parameters to use in capillary electrophoresis.
Parameters
Application typeFragment
Capillary Length50 cm
PolymerPOP 7
Dye SetD
Oven Temperature60 °C
Run Time1330 s
Run Voltage19.5 kVolts
Pre-Run Time180 s
Pre-Run Voltage15 kVolts
Injection Time8 s
Injection Voltage 1.6 kVolts
Data Delay1 s
Advanced OptionsDefault
SizecallerSizeCaller v1.1.0
15.
When electrophoresis is finished, an FSA file with the electropherogram of each sample will be provided to perform fragment analysis.

4. Expected Results

Each sample will generate an electropherogram that can be used for fragment analysis. For the NPM1 gene, PCR amplification targets a region of exon 12 where the most prevalent mutations occur: type A (c.860_863dupTCTG), type B (c.862_863insCATG) and type D (c.863_864insCCTG), all characterized by the insertion of four base pairs [16]. For the FLT3 gene, PCR amplification targets exons 14 and 15, where internal tandem duplications (FLT3/ITD) occur and may vary in their insertion length [17]. The expected wild-type PCR product sizes are approximately 170 bp for NPM1 and 329 bp for FLT3/ITD.
Furthermore, the fragment peaks are generated by using different dye sets: HEX for the NPM1 gene (green dye) and FAM for the FLT3 gene (blue dye).

4.1. Size Standard

The size standard is a fluorescence-based DNA used during the electrophoresis of each sample to precisely determine the DNA fragment size. The 500 ROX™ serves as the size standard, providing 16 single-stranded dye-labeled fragments of 35, 50, 75, 100, 139, 150, 160, 200, 250, 300, 340, 350, 400, 450, 490 and 500 bases. Before analyzing the samples, it is important to analyze if each peak of the size standard is detected correctly (Figure 2).

4.2. Sample Without NPM1 and FLT3/ITD Mutations

When a patient has a homozygous wild-type for both genes, the electropherogram will show a single peak for each gene corresponding to the wild-type allele (Figure 3).

4.3. Sample with NPM1 and FLT3/ITD Mutations

When a patient is heterozygous, the electropherogram will show two peaks for each gene: one corresponding to the wild-type allele and one corresponding to the mutant allele (Figure 4). For the NPM1 gene, exon 12 insertions will generate a fragment that is four base pairs larger than the wild-type amplicon, corresponding to the typical insertion mutations (types A, B and D). FLT3/ITD mutations consist of internal tandem duplications whose insertion length may vary between patients, most commonly occurring as in-frame insertions (multiples of three nucleotides). Therefore, the size difference between mutant and wild-type fragments will allow the estimation of the length of the duplicated sequence.

4.4. Sample with Only NPM1 Mutation

When a patient is heterozygous for the NPM1 gene and a homozygous wild-type for the FLT3 gene, the electropherogram will show two peaks (green dye) corresponding to the wild-type and mutant alleles for NPM1 and one peak (blue dye) corresponding to the wild-type allele for FLT3 (Figure 5).

4.5. Sample with Only FLT3/ITD Mutation

An electropherogram for a patient heterozygous for the FLT3/ITD and homozygous for the NPM1 gene will have two peaks (blue dye) corresponding to the wild-type and mutant alleles for FLT3 and one peak (green dye) corresponding to the wild-type allele for NPM1 (Figure 6). Remember, the size difference between the mutant and wild-type fragments will allow the estimation of the duplicated sequence length for the FLT3/ITD mutations.

4.6. FLT3/ITD Allelic Burden Calculation

Although the allelic ratio (AR) of FLT3/ITD is no longer considered in the risk stratification [12], it may still be useful for confirming FLT3/ITD positivity (cut off AR ≥ 0.05) [13,18], particularly when low-intensity peaks are observed.
The AR may be calculated using the peak height:
Allelic burden = ∑height of mutant peak(s)/height of wild-type peak
Alternatively, the peak area may be used:
Allelic burden = ∑area of mutant peak(s)/area of wild-type peak
See the examples below (Figure 7):
When off-scale peaks are present, an allelic ratio calculation is not reliable because fluorescence signal saturation results in an inaccurate peak height and area measurements. In such cases, the PCR product should be diluted before reinjection or the amount of input DNA in the PCR reaction should be reduced to obtain measurements within the linear detection range.

4.7. Quality Control

Quality control measures are essential to ensure the reliability of both the experimental procedure and fragment analysis interpretation. The main quality assurance considerations discussed throughout the protocol are summarized below as a practical checklist for routine use.
Before performing the assay:
  • Confirm that the maintenance and calibration of all equipment are up to date.
  • Verify that all reagents are properly stored and within their expiration dates.
  • Ensure that genomic DNA samples are properly quantified and standardized.
Before patient’s electropherogram interpretation:
  • Verify the correct detection of the size standard peaks (see Section 4.1). The size standard included in each sample allows the software to generate a sample-specific sizing curve, enabling accurate fragment size determination by comparing migration patterns during electrophoresis.
    ○
    Confirm that the size standard generated a consistent sizing curve for the sample.
    ○
    Ensure fragment sizing is consistent across the expected range.
  • Control samples evaluation:
    ○
    Negative controls should display only the wild-type fragment size (approximately 170 bp for NPM1 and 329 bp for FLT3/ITD).
    ▪
    The absence of amplification may indicate PCR failure. If observed, repeat PCR and fragment analysis.
    ▪
    Unexpected peaks may indicate contamination. If observed, repeat PCR and fragment analysis.
    ○
    Positive controls must reproduce previously characterized mutation patterns. Should display the wild-type and mutant fragment sizes.
    ▪
    NPM1 mutant allele should appear 4 bp larger than the wild-type. If not observed, repeat PCR and fragment analysis.
    ▪
    FLT3/ITD fragment size depends on the known insertion length of the control. If not observed, repeat PCR and fragment analysis.
    ○
    No template control (NTC): must not show any amplification peaks. Otherwise, the PCR and fragment analysis must be repeated due to the possible presence of contamination.
During electropherogram interpretation:
  • Occasionally, smaller peaks detected before the wild-type fragment may be observed during fragment analysis.
    ○
    These may correspond to small deletions, sequence variants or PCR-related artifacts within the amplified region and should not be misinterpreted as insertion-type mutations.
    ▪
    When such patterns are observed, interpretation should be performed cautiously in the context of the electropherogram profile and clinical laboratory findings. If necessary, repeat amplification or complementary molecular methods may be considered.
  • Off-scale peaks may occur due to fluorescence signal saturation. As this assay is interpreted qualitatively (the presence or absence of mutations), off-scale peaks do not typically compromise mutation detection or interpretation. However:
    ○
    The repeated injection of saturated signals may negatively affect the long-term instrument performance.
    ▪
    The dilution of PCR products before reinjection is recommended as good laboratory practice.
    ○
    When AR is required, off-scale peaks must not be used:
    ▪
    The PCR product should be diluted before reinjection, or the sample input in PCR should be reduced to obtain measurements within the linear detection range.
As this protocol describes an in-house assay, laboratories implementing the method should incorporate validation procedures into their local quality management systems, in accordance with institutional and accreditation requirements.

5. Conclusions

The protocol described here for detecting NPM1 mutations and FLT3/ITD for use in AML diagnosis is simple, easy, fast and inexpensive to implement in a laboratory when compared to other molecular techniques. Furthermore, using the same analysis for both mutations, it was possible to optimize this assay and laboratory routine with a multiplex reaction.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/mps9020059/s1, Table S1: Comparison of results obtained using the multiplex assay and the singleplex reference test for NPM1 mutation detection, including concordance percentage. Table S2: Comparison between multiplex assay results and the singleplex reference test for FLT3/ITD mutation detection, including concordance percentage and mean standard deviation (SD) of signal ratios obtained in each assay. Table S3: Duplicate analysis results used for concordance assessment of the multiplex PCR–capillary electrophoresis assay (highlighted in pink) compared with the singleplex reference assay (highlighted in orange) for FLT3/ITD mutation detection.; Table S4: Results obtained for concordance assessment during validation of the multiplex PCR with capillary electrophoresis (highlighted in pink), compared with the reference test (singleplex PCR with capillary electrophoresis, highlighted in orange) for NPM1 mutation detection. Table S5: Results obtained in intra-assay and inter-assay analyses for concordance assessment of the multiplex PCR–capillary electrophoresis assay in the detection of FLT3/ITD and NPM1 mutations for precision performance evaluation. Table S6: Results obtained in intra-assay and inter-assay analyses for concordance assessment of the multiplex PCR–capillary electrophoresis assay in detection of FLT3/ITD and NPM1 mutations for precision performance evaluation. Table S7: General information on the primers used in the multiplex assay for detection of FLT3/ITD and NPM1 mutations. Table S8: Most prevalent NPM1 gene mutations, corresponding nucleotide insertions and GenBank accession numbers of the reference sequences (RefSeq). Figure S1: In silico primer specificity analysis for NPM1 mutation detection (RefSeq NG_016018.1), targeting exon 11, performed using NCBI Primer-BLAST. Figure S2: In silico primer specificity analysis for FLT3/ITD mutation detection (RefSeq NG_007066.1), targeting exons 14 and 15, performed using NCBI Primer-BLAST. Figure S3: (A) Nucleotide sequence of the amplified fragment obtained from alignment of the primer pair targeting the NPM1 gene. (B) Nucleotide sequence of the amplified fragment obtained from alignment of the primer pair targeting the FLT3 gene. Generated using NCBI GenBank. Figure S4: (A) General alignment information comparing the amplified fragment (query) with different NPM1 mutation sequences (subject). (B) Alignment of the amplified fragment with the wild-type NPM1 sequence, showing 100% identity. (C) Alignment of the amplified fragment with a type A NPM1 mutation sequence, showing 98% identity, with the remaining 2% corresponding to the insertion gap of four base pairs (TCTG). (D) Alignment of the amplified fragment with a type B NPM1 mutation sequence, showing 98% identity, with the remaining 2% corresponding to the insertion gap of four base pairs (CATG). (E) Alignment of the amplified fragment with a type D NPM1 mutation sequence, showing 98% identity, with the remaining 2% corresponding to the insertion gap of four base pairs (CCTG). Figure S5: (A) General alignment information of the amplified fragment (query) with the sequence showing the highest identity percentage. (B) Alignment of the amplified fragment generated using the primer pair targeting exons 14 and 15 of the FLT3 gene with the wild-type sequence, showing 100% identity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.W.G. and D.C.P.; methodology—design of this study, A.H.d.S.H., E.W.G. and D.C.P.; methodology—gDNA extraction, A.H.d.S.H., J.B. and V.H.d.M.; methodology—PCR and capillary electrophoresis, A.H.d.S.H. and G.M.E.; investigation and analysis, A.H.d.S.H.; resources, E.W.G., D.C.P. and R.M.P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.H.d.S.H.; writing—review and editing, E.W.G., D.C.P., G.M.R. and W.L.M.; supervision, E.W.G. and D.C.P.; project administration, E.W.G.; funding acquisition, E.W.G. and D.C.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa e Eventos (FIPE 2022-0410) from Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (ROR: https://ror.org/010we4y38, accessed on 12 January 2026).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, CAAE number: 63728122400005327.

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to the design of this study. Discarded biological samples and external laboratory controls were used for this study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Huang, Q.; Chen, W.; Gaal, K.K.; Slovak, M.L.; Stein, A.; Weiss, L.M. A Rapid, One Step Assay for Simultaneous Detection of FLT3/ITD and NPM1 Mutations in AML with Normal Cytogenetics. Br. J. Haematol. 2008, 142, 489–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  2. Licínio, M.A.; Silva, M.C.S.D. Importância da detecção das mutações no gene FLT3 e no gene NPM1 na leucemia mielóide aguda—Classificação da Organização Mundial de Saúde 2008. Rev. Bras. Hematol. Hemoter. 2010, 32, 476–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Velloso, E.D.R.P.; Motta, C.H.A.S.d.; Furtado, J.B.; Bacal, N.S.; Silveira, P.A.A.; Moyses, C.B.; Sitnik, R.; Pinho, J.R.R. Molecular and cytogenetic abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia: Review and case studies. Einstein São Paulo 2011, 9, 184–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Zarka, J.; Short, N.J.; Kanagal-Shamanna, R.; Issa, G.C. Nucleophosmin 1 Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Genes 2020, 11, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  5. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Version 3. 2026. Available online: https://www.nccn.org (accessed on 2 February 2026).
  6. Shahab, S.; Shamsi, T.S.; Ahmed, N. Prognostic Involvement of Nucleophosmin Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. APJCP 2013, 14, 5615–5620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  7. Mencia-Trinchant, N.; Hu, Y.; Alas, M.A.; Ali, F.; Wouters, B.J.; Lee, S.; Ritchie, E.K.; Desai, P.; Guzman, M.L.; Roboz, G.J.; et al. Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring of Acute Myeloid Leukemia by Massively Multiplex Digital PCR in Patients with NPM1 Mutations. J. Mol. Diagn. JMD 2017, 19, 537–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  8. Schnittger, S.; Kern, W.; Tschulik, C.; Weiss, T.; Dicker, F.; Falini, B.; Haferlach, C.; Haferlach, T. Minimal Residual Disease Levels Assessed by NPM1 Mutation-Specific RQ-PCR Provide Important Prognostic Information in AML. Blood 2009, 114, 2220–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  9. Dobrevski, B.; Willems, H.; Lossius-Cott, C.; Müller, J.P. Targeting Oncogenic Activity and Signalling of Mutant Receptor Tyrosine Kinase FLT3. Cancers 2025, 17, 2931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  10. El Achi, H.; Kanagal-Shamanna, R. Biomarkers in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Leveraging Next Generation Sequencing Data for Optimal Therapeutic Strategies. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 748250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  11. Nitika; Wei, J.; Hui, A.-M. Role of Biomarkers in FLT3 AML. Cancers 2022, 14, 1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  12. Shimony, S.; Stahl, M.; Stone, R.M. Acute Myeloid Leukemia: 2023 Update on Diagnosis, Risk-Stratification and Management. Am. J. Hematol. 2023, 98, 502–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Vecchio, V.; Duminuco, A.; Leotta, S.; Mauro, E.; Maugeri, C.; Parisi, M.; Fiumara, P.F.; Di Raimondo, F.; Palumbo, G.A.; Gozzo, L.; et al. Real-World Outcomes in FLT3-ITD Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Impact of NPM1 Mutations and Allogeneic Transplantation in a Retrospective Unicentric Cohort. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 5110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  14. Kayser, S.; Levis, M.J. Clinical Implications of Molecular Markers in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Eur. J. Haematol. 2019, 102, 20–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  15. Forghieri, F.; Comoli, P.; Marasca, R.; Potenza, L.; Luppi, M. Minimal/Measurable Residual Disease Monitoring in NPM1-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Clinical Viewpoint and Perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, E3492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Naseem, S.; Binota, J.; Varma, N.; Virk, H.; Varma, S.; Malhotra, P. NPM1 and FLT3-ITD/TKD Gene Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Int. J. Hematol.-Oncol. Stem Cell Res. 2021, 15, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  17. Pozdnyakova, O. NPM1: Not Present? Mark! Blood 2021, 138, 2602–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  18. Thiede, C.; Prior, T.W.; Lavorgna, S.; Krauter, J.; Barragán, E.; Nomdedeu, J.; Jansen, J.H.; Wei, A.H.; Zhao, W.; Li, X.; et al. FLT3mutation Assay Laboratory Cross Validation: Results from the CALGB 10603/Ratify Trial in Patients with Newly Diagnosed FLT3-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Blood 2018, 132, 2800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Figure 1. Summary of the mutation detection workflow using a simple and easy protocol. Genomic DNA extraction was performed from whole blood or bone marrow and amplified by conventional PCR. The PCR products were analyzed using a genetic analyzer and fragment analysis was performed based on the resulting electropherograms. The image was created with Flaticon.com (accessed on 12 November 2023).
Figure 1. Summary of the mutation detection workflow using a simple and easy protocol. Genomic DNA extraction was performed from whole blood or bone marrow and amplified by conventional PCR. The PCR products were analyzed using a genetic analyzer and fragment analysis was performed based on the resulting electropherograms. The image was created with Flaticon.com (accessed on 12 November 2023).
Mps 09 00059 g001
Figure 2. The 500 ROX™ size standard. Dye-labeled fragments ranged from 35–500 bases and their intensity.
Figure 2. The 500 ROX™ size standard. Dye-labeled fragments ranged from 35–500 bases and their intensity.
Mps 09 00059 g002
Figure 3. Homozygous wild-type electropherogram for NPM1 and FLT3 genes. (A) Overview of the electropherogram showing fragment peaks generated when no mutation is detected. (B) Zoom-in on the electropherogram showing a single peak, size of 169.56 bp, consistent with wild-type allele for NPM1 gene. No mutation found. (C) Zoom-in on the electropherogram showing a single peak, size of 328.65 bp, consistent with wild-type allele for FLT3 gene. No mutation found.
Figure 3. Homozygous wild-type electropherogram for NPM1 and FLT3 genes. (A) Overview of the electropherogram showing fragment peaks generated when no mutation is detected. (B) Zoom-in on the electropherogram showing a single peak, size of 169.56 bp, consistent with wild-type allele for NPM1 gene. No mutation found. (C) Zoom-in on the electropherogram showing a single peak, size of 328.65 bp, consistent with wild-type allele for FLT3 gene. No mutation found.
Mps 09 00059 g003
Figure 4. Heterozygous electropherogram for NPM1 and FLT3/ITD genes. (A) Overview of the electropherogram showing fragment peaks generated when NPM1 and FLT3/ITD mutations are detected. (B) Zoom-in on the electropherogram showing two peaks (difference of ≌4 bp between them), size of 169.88 bp and 173.8 bp, consistent with wild-type and mutant alleles for NPM1 gene, respectively. (C) Zoom-in on the electropherogram showing two peaks, size of 328.56 bp and 364.64 bp, consistent with wild-type and mutant allele for FLT3 gene, respectively. Internal tandem duplication of ≌36 bp, corresponding to 12 trinucleotide repeats.
Figure 4. Heterozygous electropherogram for NPM1 and FLT3/ITD genes. (A) Overview of the electropherogram showing fragment peaks generated when NPM1 and FLT3/ITD mutations are detected. (B) Zoom-in on the electropherogram showing two peaks (difference of ≌4 bp between them), size of 169.88 bp and 173.8 bp, consistent with wild-type and mutant alleles for NPM1 gene, respectively. (C) Zoom-in on the electropherogram showing two peaks, size of 328.56 bp and 364.64 bp, consistent with wild-type and mutant allele for FLT3 gene, respectively. Internal tandem duplication of ≌36 bp, corresponding to 12 trinucleotide repeats.
Mps 09 00059 g004
Figure 5. Heterozygous and homozygous wild-type electropherogram for NPM1 and FLT3 genes, respectively. (A) Overview of the electropherogram showing fragment peaks generated when only an NPM1 mutation is detected. (B) Zoom-in on the electropherogram showing two peaks (difference of ≌4 bp between them), size of 169.55 bp and 173.51 bp, consistent with wild-type and mutant alleles for NPM1 gene, respectively. (C) Zoom-in on the electropherogram showing only one peak, size of 328.64 bp, consistent with wild-type allele for FLT3 gene. No mutation found.
Figure 5. Heterozygous and homozygous wild-type electropherogram for NPM1 and FLT3 genes, respectively. (A) Overview of the electropherogram showing fragment peaks generated when only an NPM1 mutation is detected. (B) Zoom-in on the electropherogram showing two peaks (difference of ≌4 bp between them), size of 169.55 bp and 173.51 bp, consistent with wild-type and mutant alleles for NPM1 gene, respectively. (C) Zoom-in on the electropherogram showing only one peak, size of 328.64 bp, consistent with wild-type allele for FLT3 gene. No mutation found.
Mps 09 00059 g005
Figure 6. Heterozygous and homozygous wild-type electropherogram for FLT3 and NPM1 genes, respectively. (A) Overview of the electropherogram showing fragment peaks generated when only a FLT3/ITD mutation is detected. (B) Zoom-in on the electropherogram showing only one peak, size of 169.56 bp, consistent with wild-type allele for NPM1 gene. No mutation found. (C) Zoom-in on the electropherogram showing two peaks, size of 328.59 bp and 396.28 bp, consistent with wild-type and mutant allele for FLT3 gene, respectively. Internal tandem duplication of ≌68 bp.
Figure 6. Heterozygous and homozygous wild-type electropherogram for FLT3 and NPM1 genes, respectively. (A) Overview of the electropherogram showing fragment peaks generated when only a FLT3/ITD mutation is detected. (B) Zoom-in on the electropherogram showing only one peak, size of 169.56 bp, consistent with wild-type allele for NPM1 gene. No mutation found. (C) Zoom-in on the electropherogram showing two peaks, size of 328.59 bp and 396.28 bp, consistent with wild-type and mutant allele for FLT3 gene, respectively. Internal tandem duplication of ≌68 bp.
Mps 09 00059 g006
Figure 7. Three examples of allelic ratio calculation for FLT3/ITD by using height (ht) and area (ar) of the peaks. (A) Electropherogram showing an allelic ratio of ≌0.02 (≤cut off of 0.05). Based on allelic ratio, this sample is negative for FLT3/ITD. (B) Electropherogram showing an example of a positive sample for FLT3/ITD with a low allelic ratio ≌ 0.2 with two mutant peaks. (C) Electropherogram showing an example of a positive sample for FLT3/ITD with a high allelic ratio ≌ 0.5.
Figure 7. Three examples of allelic ratio calculation for FLT3/ITD by using height (ht) and area (ar) of the peaks. (A) Electropherogram showing an allelic ratio of ≌0.02 (≤cut off of 0.05). Based on allelic ratio, this sample is negative for FLT3/ITD. (B) Electropherogram showing an example of a positive sample for FLT3/ITD with a low allelic ratio ≌ 0.2 with two mutant peaks. (C) Electropherogram showing an example of a positive sample for FLT3/ITD with a high allelic ratio ≌ 0.5.
Mps 09 00059 g007
Table 1. Primers sequences used in PCR for detection of NPM1 mutations and Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3/ITD).
Table 1. Primers sequences used in PCR for detection of NPM1 mutations and Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3/ITD).
Sequence (5′ → 3′)PCR Product Size (bp)
NPM1 ForwardATTTCTTTTTTTTTTTTTCCAGGCTATTCAAG
NPM1 ReverseHEX—CACGGTAGGGAAAGTTCTCACTCTGC172
FLT3/ITD ForwardGCAATTTAGGTATGAAAGCCAGC
FLT3/ITD ReverseFAM—CTTTCAGCATTTTGACGGCAACC329
Table 2. Components required for the PCR mix, respective volumes and the final concentration.
Table 2. Components required for the PCR mix, respective volumes and the final concentration.
ComponentsVolume (μL)/ReactionFinal Concentration
10× Buffer51×
MgCl2 50 mM1.51.5 mM
dNTP mix 2.5 mM40.2 mM
NPM1 Primer Forward 10 μM10.2 μM
NPM1 Primer Reverse 10 μM10.2 μM
FLT3/ITD Primer Forward 10 μM10.2 μM
FLT3/ITD Primer Reverse 10 μM10.2 μM
Taq DNA Polymerase (5 U/μL)0.5250 U
Nuclease free-water30-
Total45-
Table 4. Reagents for capillary electrophoresis and the volume required for one reaction.
Table 4. Reagents for capillary electrophoresis and the volume required for one reaction.
ComponentsVolume (μL)/Reaction
500 ROX™ Size Standard0.3
Hi-Di™ Formamide9.3
Total9.6
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hellwig, A.H.d.S.; Ewald, G.M.; Rodrigues, G.M.; Matos, W.L.; Bergmann, J.; Melo, V.H.d.; Paiva, R.M.; Pereira, D.C.; Gomez, E.W. A Simple and Fast Protocol to Detect Nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) Mutation and Fms-like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Internal Tandem Duplication (FLT3/ITD): Optimizing Laboratory Routine. Methods Protoc. 2026, 9, 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/mps9020059

AMA Style

Hellwig AHdS, Ewald GM, Rodrigues GM, Matos WL, Bergmann J, Melo VHd, Paiva RM, Pereira DC, Gomez EW. A Simple and Fast Protocol to Detect Nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) Mutation and Fms-like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Internal Tandem Duplication (FLT3/ITD): Optimizing Laboratory Routine. Methods and Protocols. 2026; 9(2):59. https://doi.org/10.3390/mps9020059

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hellwig, Alessandra Helena da Silva, Gisele Menezes Ewald, Grazielle Motta Rodrigues, William Latosinski Matos, Juliana Bergmann, Viviane Horn de Melo, Rodrigo Minuto Paiva, Dariane Castro Pereira, and Eduardo Wandame Gomez. 2026. "A Simple and Fast Protocol to Detect Nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) Mutation and Fms-like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Internal Tandem Duplication (FLT3/ITD): Optimizing Laboratory Routine" Methods and Protocols 9, no. 2: 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/mps9020059

APA Style

Hellwig, A. H. d. S., Ewald, G. M., Rodrigues, G. M., Matos, W. L., Bergmann, J., Melo, V. H. d., Paiva, R. M., Pereira, D. C., & Gomez, E. W. (2026). A Simple and Fast Protocol to Detect Nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) Mutation and Fms-like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Internal Tandem Duplication (FLT3/ITD): Optimizing Laboratory Routine. Methods and Protocols, 9(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/mps9020059

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop