Next Article in Journal
Super-Resolution Deep Learning Reconstruction Improves Image Quality of Dynamic Myocardial Computed Tomography Perfusion Imaging
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Scout Direction, Off-Centering, and Scout Imaging Parameters on Radiation Dose Modulation in CT
error_outline You can access the new MDPI.com website here. Explore and share your feedback with us.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Honda et al. Visual Evaluation of Ultrafast MRI in the Assessment of Residual Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Preliminary Study Association with Subtype. Tomography 2022, 8, 1522–1533

1
Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawaharacho, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
2
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kansai Electric Power Hospital, 2-1-7, Fukushima, Osaka 553-0003, Japan
3
Institute for Advancement of Clinical and Translational Science (iACT), Kyoto University Hospital, 4 Shogoin-Kawaharacho, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
4
Department of Translational Medicine, Diagnostic Radiology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, 205-02 Malmo, Sweden
5
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Yamadahirao-cho, Kyoto 615-8256, Japan
6
MR Application Predevelopment, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Allee am Roethelheimpark 2, 91052 Erlangen, Germany
7
Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin-Kawaharacho, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
8
Department of Breast Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawaharacho, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Tomography 2026, 12(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography12010006
Submission received: 10 December 2025 / Revised: 12 December 2025 / Accepted: 12 December 2025 / Published: 6 January 2026
This correction addresses several errors identified in the original publication [1].
  • Definitions of Abbreviations
The definitions for previously undefined abbreviations have been added to the manuscript as follows:
  • In the Abstract, Section 2.4 and Results, “ROC” and “AUC” were expanded to “receiver operating characteristic (ROC)” and “area under the ROC curve (AUC)”, respectively.
  • In the Abstract, Introduction and Results, “DCE” was expanded to “dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)”.
  • In the Introduction, “CR” and “HER2” were expanded to “complete response (CR)” and “human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)”, respectively.
  • In Section 3, “CDK 4/6” was expanded to “cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6)”.
  • In the Figure 1 legend, “UF-DCE” was expanded to “ultrafast DCE”.
  • In the Figure 2 legend, the text “UF-DCE MRI: ultrafast DCE MRI” has been corrected to “UF-DCE: ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI”.
  • In the Figure 7 legend, “CR” and “ultrafast-DCE” have been corrected to “complete response” and “ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced”, respectively.
  • In the Figure 8 legend, “CDK 4/6” and “DCE” have been corrected to “cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6” and “dynamic contrast-enhanced”, respectively.
2.
Correction of Numerical Data in Results Section
The previously published number of lesions achieving pathological complete response (pCR) was incorrect.
A correction has been made to the first paragraph in Results section:
A total of 55 lesions in 55 patients were evaluated, of which 22 lesions achieved pCR.
3.
Corrections of Table 2
Table 2 as published contained a mistake. The data columns for pCR and non-pCR was reversed. The corrected Table 2 appears below.
4.
Data Availability Statement
The incorrect Data Availability Statement (“not applicable”) was revised to accurately reflect the availability of our research data. The updated statement is as follows: The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author due to institutional ethical restrictions concerning patient privacy. Only anonymized, analyzed data (excluding patient identifiable information and images) can be considered for sharing, contingent upon review and approval by our institutional review board.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. These corrections were approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Honda, M.; Kataoka, M.; Iima, M.; Ota, R.; Ohashi, A.; Kishimoto, A.O.; Miyake, K.K.; Nickel, M.D.; Yamada, Y.; Toi, M.; et al. Visual Evaluation of Ultrafast MRI in the Assessment of Residual Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Preliminary Study Association with Subtype. Tomography 2022, 8, 1522–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 2. The patient characteristics.
Table 2. The patient characteristics.
VariablesnOverall, n = 55 1pCR, n = 22 1Non-pCR, n = 33 1p-Value 2
Age (years)5549.7 ± 11.748.6 ± 9.750.5 ± 12.90.8
Subtype55 0.007
Luminal 33 (60%)8 (36%)25 (76%)
HER2+ 5 (9.1%)4 (18%)1 (3.0%)
TN 17 (31%)10 (45%)7 (21%)
pre-NST size (mm)54 340.5 ± 23.728.9 ± 19.848.5 ± 23.0<0.001
Morphology54 3 0.5
mass 43 (80%)19 (86%)24 (75%)
NME 11 (20%)3 (14%)8 (25%)
Shrink pattern54 3 0.004
CR 5 (9.3%)5 (23%)0 (0%)
CS 24 (44%)12 (55%)12 (38%)
non-CS 17 (31%)4 (18%)13 (41%)
SD 8 (15%)1 (4.5%)7 (22%)
Data in columns 2 and 3 are the number of patients with the percentage in parentheses. 1 Mean ± SD or n (%). 2 Wilcoxon rank sum test or Fisher’s exact test. 3 One patient was excluded because pre-NST MRI was not available. pCR, pathological complete response; luminal, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive; HER2+, ER-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive; TN, triple-negative; NST, neoadjuvant systemic treatment; NME, non-mass enhancement; CR, complete response on MRI; CS, concentric shrinkage; and SD, stable disease on MRI.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Honda, M.; Kataoka, M.; Iima, M.; Ota, R.; Ohashi, A.; Kishimoto, A.O.; Miyake, K.K.; Nickel, M.D.; Yamada, Y.; Toi, M.; et al. Correction: Honda et al. Visual Evaluation of Ultrafast MRI in the Assessment of Residual Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Preliminary Study Association with Subtype. Tomography 2022, 8, 1522–1533. Tomography 2026, 12, 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography12010006

AMA Style

Honda M, Kataoka M, Iima M, Ota R, Ohashi A, Kishimoto AO, Miyake KK, Nickel MD, Yamada Y, Toi M, et al. Correction: Honda et al. Visual Evaluation of Ultrafast MRI in the Assessment of Residual Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Preliminary Study Association with Subtype. Tomography 2022, 8, 1522–1533. Tomography. 2026; 12(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography12010006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Honda, Maya, Masako Kataoka, Mami Iima, Rie Ota, Akane Ohashi, Ayami Ohno Kishimoto, Kanae Kawai Miyake, Marcel Dominik Nickel, Yosuke Yamada, Masakazu Toi, and et al. 2026. "Correction: Honda et al. Visual Evaluation of Ultrafast MRI in the Assessment of Residual Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Preliminary Study Association with Subtype. Tomography 2022, 8, 1522–1533" Tomography 12, no. 1: 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography12010006

APA Style

Honda, M., Kataoka, M., Iima, M., Ota, R., Ohashi, A., Kishimoto, A. O., Miyake, K. K., Nickel, M. D., Yamada, Y., Toi, M., & Nakamoto, Y. (2026). Correction: Honda et al. Visual Evaluation of Ultrafast MRI in the Assessment of Residual Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Preliminary Study Association with Subtype. Tomography 2022, 8, 1522–1533. Tomography, 12(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography12010006

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop