Next Article in Journal
Enhancing Fetal Anomaly Detection in Ultrasonography Images: A Review of Machine Learning-Based Approaches
Next Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Studies Regarding the Effect of Cellulose Acetate-Based Composite Coatings on the Functional Properties of the Biodegradable Mg3Nd Alloys
Previous Article in Journal
Piezoelectric and Triboelectric Nanogenerators for Enhanced Wound Healing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Fixations for Additively Manufactured Cranial Implants: Insights from Finite Element Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomimetics
Volume 8
Issue 7
10.3390/biomimetics8070518
biomimetics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Advancements in Composite Materials and Their Expanding Role in Biomedical Applications

by
Sivakamavalli Jeyachandran
1,*,
Hethesh Chellapandian
1 and
Nemat Ali
2
1
Lab in Biotechnology & Biosignal Transduction, Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College & Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, India
2
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2457, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomimetics 2023, 8(7), 518; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8070518
Submission received: 14 September 2023 / Revised: 18 October 2023 / Accepted: 25 October 2023 / Published: 1 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Biomimetic Materials and Devices for Biomedical Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The synthesis of a Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite incorporating chitosan (CS/Ni-doped ZnO) was achieved via a precipitation method, followed by annealing at 250 °C. This study comprehensively examined the nanocomposite’s structural, functional, morphological, and porosity properties using various analytical techniques, including X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (HR-SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis. The presence of chitosan (CS) and nickel (Ni) within the nanocomposite, along with their influence on reducing the band gap of ZnO particles and enhancing the generation of electron-hole pairs, was confirmed using UV-visible near-infrared spectroscopy (UV-vis-NIR). The electrochemical properties of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite were investigated via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and cyclic voltammetry (CV) by utilizing a phosphate buffer solution with a pH of 6, which closely resembled the typical pH of bacterial cell walls. Finally, the prepared CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite was evaluated for its antibacterial and anticancer activities. The results demonstrated the highest inhibition of bacterial growth in P. vulgaris, whereas the lowest inhibition was found in S. aureus across various concentrations, thus highlighting its potential in antimicrobial applications. The cytotoxicity of CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposites demonstrated remarkable effects with a half-maximum inhibitory concentration of approximately 80 ± 0.23 µg mL−1 against MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines, following a dose-dependent manner.

1. Introduction

Recently, the construction of hybrid structure-based nanoparticles has become a very hot topic in the biomedical, material science and engineering fields due to their unique properties [1]. They consist of organic and inorganic materials with at least one component in nanodimensions [2]. In the development of hybrid nanostructures, the utilization of natural organic biopolymers of chitosan is of significant interest as the primary source. In this regard, inorganic metal oxides such as ZnO, TiO2 and NiO nanoparticles are used extensively in the fabrication of antibacterial agents to enhance the sterile nature of the materials [3,4,5].
Chitosan is a naturally occurring biopolymer, which is deacetylated from chitin soluble only in weak acids, such as acetic and formic acids [6], and maximum deacetylation (70% to 98%) is obtained from the exoskeleton and cell walls of crustaceans [7,8]. It contains high units of hydroxyl and amino functional groups, which provide several side chains that are stable in the highly hydrophobic natures of both acidic and basic mediums. The presence of OH and NH2 functional groups are used to stabilize metal oxide nanoparticles and interact with the bacterial membrane of the negative charge containing phospholipids and proteins, which is essential for antibacterial effects in acidic conditions [9] and exhibits self-imbibed biocompatibility, nontoxicity and eco-friendliness [10,11,12].
Additionally, zinc oxide (ZnO~3.3 eV) is a semiconducting metal oxide with transparency in visible light and exhibits superior antibacterial activity [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Moreover, material science researchers suggested that ZnO is highly effective in antibacterial activity with a pH range of 6-8 [18] and has three features: first, ZnO releases the dissociated Zn2+ [19,20]; second, ZnO interacts with the surface of the bacterial cell wall [21]; third, reactive oxygen species (ROS) is generated, such as oxygen anions, hydrogen peroxide, hydroperoxides and hydroxyl radicals [22]. However, some limitations, principally the fast recombination rate of the generated electron and positive hole, occur in pure ZnO nanoparticles used as antibacterial agents [23]. To overcome these limitations, ZnO is doped with different metallic ions such as Ce, Ag, Fe and Ni [13,24,25,26,27]. Among the metal ion oxides, nickel oxide (NiO) is a p-type material with an excitation energy of 110 MeV and favorable electronic structure and optical properties. It is capable of acting as a good transporting agent that is nontoxic and eco-friendly [28,29,30]. Several researchers reported the photodegradation of organic dyes with the sol–gel process using Ni-doped ZnO nanospheres [31], Ce–ZnO composites using the microwave irradiation method [32] and the co-precipitation route using Ni-doped ZnO nanorods [33]. The microwave-assisted synthesis of the Ag–ZnO nanocomposite was used to examine antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli [34] and the hydrothermal reaction of zinc-doped nickel hydroxide nanosheets in a nonenzymatic glucose sensor [35]. These results indicate that different metal ions can be doped with ZnO interstices to improve their properties for various applications. Other researchers used chitosan-based hybrid nanocomposites of chitosan–ZnO [36], chitosan/Ni0.2Zn0.2Fe2.6O4 [37], chitosan-Au/Pd/Ag NPs [38], chitosan/Ag/MoS [39], chitosan–Ni/NiO [40] and Ni/Al/Chitosan [41] for phocatalysis, as well as biomedical and electrochemical applications. Here, we develop the synthesis of biogenic chitosan incorporated with Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposites, and its biocompatible properties are checked using antimicrobial and anticancer activities. In the first step, the Ni-doped Zn(OH)2 nanocomposite was synthesized via a chemical precipitation route, after which chitosan was functionalized with the Ni-doped Zn(OH)2 nanocomposite using a hydrothermal process. The addition of chitosan and Ni doping to the ZnO nanostructure was systematically studied, and the crystalline, structural, morphological and electrochemical properties were investigated using various techniques. Further, the microbial inhibitory activity of the nanocomposite was evaluated against bacterial strains including both Gram-positive and -negative bacteria, and in vitro anticancer activity was assessed in MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines.

2. Experiments

2.1. Materials

Chitosan (molecular weight of 310 kDa, degree of deacetylation: 80–95%) was purchased from South India Seafoods, Rameswaram, Tamil Nadu, India. Analytical grade nickel nitrate hexahydrate [Ni(NO3)2.6H2O, 99%] and zinc nitrate hexahydrate [Zn(NO3)2.6H2O, 99.8%] were purchased from LOBA Chemie (P) Ltd., Mumbai, India. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 98%) was purchased from CDH (P) Ltd. Analytical grade disodium phosphate (Na2HPO4) and monosodium phosphate(NaH2PO4) were purchased from LOBA Chemie (P) Ltd., Mumbai, India. Acetic acid (CH3COOH, 99.7%), acetone (CH3CHO, 99.9%) and ethanol (C2H5OH, 99.8%) were purchased from Fischer Chemic Ltd., India. The chemicals were of an analytical reagent grade and used without any further purification. Millipore water was used in all experiments.

2.2. Synthesis of Nickel-Doped Zn(OH)2 Composite

The Ni-doped Zn(OH)2 composite was synthesized using a precipitation method, and the schematic representation is illustrated in Scheme 1a. About 1M of Zn(NO3)2.H2O and 0.25 M of Ni(NO3)2.6H2O were dissolved in 50 mL of deionized water under magnetic stirring for 40 min at room temperature. Then, 3M of NaOH was added dropwise into the above mixture and stirred for 1 h until the complex precipitate was obtained. The obtained product was rinsed multiple times with deionized water and ethanol. It was designated as beaker A.

2.3. Synthesis of CS/Ni-Doped ZnO Nanocomposite

The synthesis of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite was carried out using a two-step chemical precipitation method, which is illustrated in Scheme 1b. In the first step, chitosan (25 mg) was dissolved in a 50 mL volume of 3% acetic acid under magnetic stirring for 1 h at room temperature (28 °C) to form a gel phase solution, the pH was adjusted to 8, and the solution was designated as beaker B. Second, the prepared Ni-doped Zn(OH)2 complexes (beaker A) were slowly added into the dispersed chitosan (beaker B). Then, an ultrasound was used on the reaction mixture for 5 h to form a Ni-doped Zn(OH)2 dispersed chitosan matrix. During this process, the bulk Ni-doped Zn(OH)2 particles were exfoliated and bound with the functional group of the chitosan matrix. Finally, the reaction mixture was heated in an oven at 120 °C for 2 h. The ZnO, binary composites of CS/ZnO and Ni-doped ZnO were synthesized using a similar procedure. Finally, the obtained products were heated in a hot air oven at 250 °C for 3 h with a ramp rate of 10 °C min−1. The synthesis of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite is clearly depicted in Scheme 1.

2.4. Fabrication of CS/Ni-Doped ZnO Nanocomposite Modified GCE

Before modification, the glassy carbon electrode (GCE) was refined using a 0.05μm alumina slurry and then rinsed thoroughly with distilled water under an ultrasound for 5 min and dried in the air. The CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite (1 mg) was dissipated in 2 mL of ethanol under an ultrasound for 30 min, after which 5 μL of the suspension was dropped onto the surface of the pre-cleaned GCE using the drop-casting method. Finally, the modified electrode was dried in the air for 2 h at room temperature.

2.5. Characterization

The crystalline behavior of the materials was studied using the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns obtained from an X-ray diffractometer (model XPERT-PRO) (Rigaku diffractor with CuKα radiation) with ambient conditions over a 2θ region of 20–80° at a rate of 2°/min (40 kV, 20 mA). The morphological studies were obtained via HR-SEM (HR-SEM, FEI-quanta FEG 250) and TEM (FEG-TEM 300 kV) analyses. The structural properties were measured using the FT-IR spectrum and recorded on a PerkinElmer 2000 spectrophotometer, with a range of 4000–400 cm−1, using KBr pellets at room temperature. The optical properties of the samples were examined using UV-Vis-NIR spectroscopy (JASCO spectrophotometer). The specific surface area and pore volume of the synthesized products were measured using the nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherm with Gemini model 2380. The electrical properties of the samples were measured using a CH instrument (Autolab model CHI1102A).
The voltammetric and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) studies were carried out using a three-electrode system containing a 50 mM phosphate buffer solution (pH = 6) of 5 mM [Fe (CN)6]3−/4− with a potential range from 0.2 to 0.8 V and AC frequency range from 105 kHz to 0.01 Hz at OCP with an amplitude of 5 mV. Glassy carbon (3 mm diameter), platinum and saturated calomel electrodes were used as working, counter and reference electrodes, respectively.

2.6. Antimicrobial Evaluations

The antibacterial activities of the prepared CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite were tested against Gram-positive and -negative bacteria, as shown in Table 1. The zone of inhibition was measured using the well diffusion method, and the effect was compared with that of a commonly used antibiotic like Ampicillin. The abovementioned bacteria were grown individually. The nutrient agar medium was used for bacterial growth and was poured onto Petri plates. Fresh bacterial cultures of both organisms were swabbed onto the agar medium and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The antimicrobial activity was evaluated by measuring the zone of inhibition.

2.7. Cytotoxicity Studies

The cytotoxicity (in vitro) study was conducted with the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite at different concentrations (0–150 µg mL−1) against Hep G-2 human liver cancer cell lines based on the methodology adopted by Mosmann et al. (1983) [42]. In the end, the IC50 concentration of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite was calculated using Origin Pro 8 software. Further, the IC50-treated liver cancer cell lines were visualized for morphological changes using an inverted phase contrast microscope.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. XRD Analysis

The crystalline structure of pristine ZnO and NiO, the binary structure of CS/ZnO and Ni-doped ZnO and the ternary structure of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite are shown in Figure 1. The pristine ZnO (Figure 1a) displays the characteristic peaks appearing at 30.83, 33.48, 35.42, 46.30, 55.73, 61.54 and 66.61° and corresponding to the planes of hexagonal wurtzite ZnO (100), (002), (101), (102), (110), (103) and (112), which are consistent with the JCPDS card numbers 01080-0075, respectively. The CS/ZnO binary composite (Figure 1b) clearly displays that the plane of (002) decreased in intensity, which indicates that the ZnO nanoparticles are incorporated with the chitosan matrix [32]. Meanwhile, the pristine NiO (Figure 1c) exhibits characteristic peaks at 37.11, 43.40, 62.98, 75.31 and 79.43° corresponding to the planes of (111), (200), (220), (311), and (222), respectively, which accord with the cubic crystal structure of NiO nanoparticles [43]. The crystal pattern of the Ni-doped ZnO (Figure 1d) exhibits a new peak at 2θ = 43.40°, which corresponds to the plane of nickel oxide (200), and the intensity of the ZnO planes increases, which may be attributed to the smaller ionic radius of Ni2+ ions (ionic radius = 0.69 nm) easily substituted at Zn2+ sites (ionic radius = 0.74 nm). Generally, the replacement of the host metal ion by the guest metal takes place when the size of the dopant ion is of reduced radius size than that of the guest lattice ion [44], which suggests that nickel ions are incorporated into the ZnO lattice. The ternary hybrid nanostructure of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO is shown in Figure 1e. A narrow peak intensity and a new peak appear at 2θ = 37.11 and 43.40° corresponding to the planes of nickel oxide (111) and (200), which are ascribed to the chitosan and act as a metal ion chelating agent. Meanwhile, the addition of a lower ionic radius of Ni2+ creates intrinsic stress on the ZnO lattice sites. The biogenic chitosan and Ni2+ ions altered the sizes, shapes and microstructures of the ZnO nanoparticles.

3.2. FTIR Analysis

The structural properties of the synthesized materials were analyzed using the FT-IR spectra and the results are illustrated in Figure 2. As per this study, pristine ZnO (curve a) displays have characteristic peaks at 3421, 1640, 1073 and 480 cm−1 representing the O-H stretching, H-O-H bending, Zn-O-Zn stretching and formation of the Zn-O bond, respectively [30,33,45]. The chitosan-incorporated ZnO (Figure 2b) exhibits peaks at 3392, 1615, 1413, 1047 and 493 cm−1 corresponding to the O-H stretching, amine group (-NH2) bending, symmetrical deformation of the CH3 group, C-O-C stretching of saccharide units and ZnO stretching vibrations, respectively [46,47]. The major characteristic peaks of pristine NiO (curve c) appear at 1640 and 516 cm−1 corresponding to the H-O-H bending and Ni-O vibrations, which indicates the presence of NiO [48]. The additional peak at 1400 cm−1 may be ascribed to the nitrate (NO3-) group, which arises from the source material of nickel nitrate [49]. When the results of the Ni-doped ZnO (curve d) are compared with the pristine ZnO (curve a), two distinct broad peaks are seen at around 517 and 455 cm−1 representing Ni-O and Zn-O, respectively, and certain peaks are moved slightly to lower and higher wave numbers indicating that Ni2+ has been occupied at Zn2+ sites. The FTIR spectra of CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite (curve e) have characteristic peaks at 3392, 1627, 1501, 1375, 1073 and 430 cm−1 corresponding to the O-H stretching, bending vibration of NH2, C-N vibration, CH3 symmetrical deformation, C-O-C stretching of saccharide units and Ni-doped ZnO, respectively, which indicates that the lower ionic radius of guest Ni2+ ions strongly influenced the host ZnO and created a lattice defect in the chitosan matrix by intrinsically binding a large number of metal oxides into the host zinc oxide sites. Also, the synergistic effect of the three different units creates shifts in peak positions.

3.3. UV-Vis-NIR Analysis

The UV-Vis-NIR spectra of ZnO, CS/ZnO, NiO, Ni-doped ZnO and CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite in the wavelength range of 250-2500 nm are shown in Figure 3. All the samples have strong absorption spectra at the UV region between 250 and 375 nm. The UV-Vis-NIR spectra peak of ZnO (Figure 3a), CS/ZnO (Figure 3b), NiO (Figure 3c), Ni-doped ZnO (Figure 3d) and CS/Ni-doped ZnO (Figure 3e) nanocomposites correspond to 343, 348, 349, 353 and 356 nm, respectively. The result of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite spectrum is slightly red and shifted to a higher wavelength compared to the Ni-doped ZnO.
This may be due to the synergistic effect of organic and inorganic material increasing the wavelength. In addition, the biosurfactant of the biogenic chitosan polymer was intrinsically coupled with the metal oxide particles and increased the wavelength. The band gaps of these absorptions are shown in Figure 4. The band gaps are calculated as described in previously published papers [50,51]. As shown in Figure 4, the band gap energies for these samples decreased from 3.17, 3.05, 2.92, 2.86 and 2.79 eV for ZnO (Figure 4a), CS/ZnO (Figure 4b), NiO (Figure 4c), Ni-doped ZnO (Figure 4d) and CS/Ni-doped ZnO (Figure 4e) nanocomposites, respectively. It was concluded that the incorporation of biogenic chitosan led to a decrease in the optical band gap of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite.
Furthermore, the comparable ionic radius of Ni2+ also reduced the band energy, which is generally attributed to the Burstein–Moss shift and resulted in filled electronic states near the bottom of the conduction bands [52,53].

3.4. Morphological Analysis

The surface morphologies of the synthesized materials are displayed in Figure 4. From these pictures, it can be seen that pristine ZnO (Figure 4a) nanoparticles have aggregated particles and CS/ZnO (Figure 4b) exhibits a porous structure, where the metal oxides have larger embedded micropores that could be ascribed to the electrostatic interactions between the chitosan backbone and ZnO nanoparticles [54]. Figure 4c displays the particles, which also exhibit agglomerated grain structures. The Ni-doped ZnO (Figure 4d) displays an agglomerated grain structure due to Ni2+ incorporated into ZnO, and the defect of lattice distortion is induced by Ni2+ in Zn-O sites [55,56]. Also, it was observed that the cubic shape and nonuniform size and agglomeration of secondary NiO particles were seen due to the small dimensions and high activation energy of metal oxide particles [55,56]. The ternary structure of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite (Figure 4e) depicts a rod-like structure, which was assigned to the ZnO nanoparticles and intrinsically distributed in the chitosan biopolymer, absorbing a large number of comparable ionic radii of nickel metal ions that contain metal hydroxides at ZnO sites. Compared to the binary structure of the Ni-doped ZnO composite, the ternary structure of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite shows a more packed and well-shaped structure, which may be due to the chitosan polymer extending the growth rate of metal oxide and producing a rod-shaped structure. Finally, the ternary structure of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite analyzed using TEM and displayed in Figure 4f exhibits a rod-like structure with a range of 100 nm, which is consistent with the SEM results.

3.5. BET Analysis

The synthesized materials of ZnO, CS/ZnO, NiO, Ni-doped ZnO and CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite were measured using nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms and are shown in Figure 5, and the results of all samples have type IV characteristics, suggesting their mesoporous features [57]. Table 1 shows the calculated surface areas, pore volumes and pore sizes of the materials. From these results, the ternary structure of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite has a larger surface area due to the doping level of Ni into the ZnO lattice sites making some changes and defects in the crystalline microstructure, leading to the enhancement of the porous character [58]. as Additionally, the porous nature of the chitosan acts as a stabilizing agent, and it could be embedded within the pores present in the shells of the ZnO particles, thus creating some defects and improving the surface area and porosity character of the nanocomposites.

3.6. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy

The electrochemical impedance of ZnO, CS/ZnO, NiO, Ni-doped ZnO and CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite modified electrodes were measured using a 50 mM phosphate buffer solution (PBS) solution containing 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− in the frequency range of 0.1 Hz to 100 KHz, as shown in Figure 6. Generally, the EIS spectrum consists of a capacitive loop in high frequency and a straight line in low frequency. The capacitive loop is the function of an electron transfer process at the electrode/electrolyte interface, and the straight line in low frequency is associated with the diffusion process. From these results, it can be observed that a straight line denotes Warburg resistance and the diffusion-limiting process, which is due to their good conductivities [59]. The charge transfer resistance values of ZnO, CS/ZnO, NiO, Ni-doped ZnO and CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite are shown in Table 2. The charge transfer resistance (Rct) value of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite modified electrode is smaller than those of all the other modified electrodes, indicating higher electrical conductivity, which is due to the interactive effect of chitosan and the Ni-doped ZnO. Meanwhile, the cationic chitosan polymer behaves as an electron-conducting mediator in the electron transfer process.

3.7. Cyclic Voltammetry Studies

The cyclic voltammograms of the modified electrodes were performed in the 50 mM PBS containing 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− with potential from −0.2 to 0.8 V at a scan rate of 50 mV/s, and the results are shown in Figure 7. It can be seen that the CV curves of ZnO, CS/ZnO, NiO, Ni-doped ZnO and CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite-modified electrodes exhibiting redox peak currents are (9.30/−5.79 µA), (9.33/−8.86 µA), (9.61/−8.74 µA), (10.06/−8.86 µA) and (11.43/−8.87 µA), respectively. It is surprising that the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite-modified electrode has a higher redox peak current than those of all the other modified electrodes, indicating that the integration of biogenic chitosan polymer with Ni-doped ZnO nanoparticles can move faster in the electron transfer process between the electrode and electrolyte interface. Also, the synthesized nanocomposite has a higher surface area and mesoporous core–shell structure, which may expose the large electro-active surface area with electrolytes [60]. This result is consistent with the previously discussed BET analysis and EIS studies results.

3.8. Antibacterial Activity Mechanism

The proposed antibacterial activity mechanism is explained in Figure 8, where the biogenic chitosan and Ni-doped ZnO synergistically contribute to enhancing the antibacterial and cytotoxicity activities. The antimicrobial activity of the synthesized CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite was assessed using materials of different concentrations against the listed Gram-positive and -negative strains. Table 3 shows that the antimicrobial activity increased in Gram-positive strains such as S. aureus, L. monocytogens and B. subtilis compared to Gram-negative strains such as E. coli, P. vulgaris and V. parahaemolyticus along with the zone of inhibition.

3.9. In Vitro Cytotoxicity

The toxic effect of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite exhibits impressive cytotoxicity with a half-maximum inhibitory concentration of about 80 ± 0.23 µg mL−1 against MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines in a dose-dependent manner in an MTT assay (Figure 9). However, the exact mechanism of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite involved in the inhibitory action of MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines is not well understood. Further, the morphology of the MCF-7 breast cancer cells was monitored when treated with the IC50 concentration of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite. In the control experiment, MCF-7 breast cancer cells appeared to have cell blebbing and shrinkage(Figure 10). The primary mechanism is a generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) on the surface of the nanoparticles, which allows the release of Ni2+ and Zn2+ ions from the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite. When the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposites are irradiated with light having high photon energy or energy equal to the band gap, they cause the transfer of electrons from the valence band to the conduction band of the synthesized material. The shrinkage of the band gap is caused by nickel doping, which results in an enhancement in the photogeneration of electron-hole pairs [61]. The ability of biogenic chitosan to retard the recombination of photogenerated electron-hole pairs is by readily accepting the free electrons from the conduction band and transporting them quickly through the carbon backbone of biogenic chitosan polysaccharide, which is spread underneath the particles.
It leads to the generation of holes in the valence band, which can react with hydroxyl groups and absorb water to create hydroxyl radicals (−OH) and superoxide anion radicals (O2-). The Ni-doped ZnO nanoparticles penetrate through the cell membranes of the bacteria in contact with them [62,63]. The generation of ROS may lead to cell wall dysfunction and rupture due to membrane lipid oxidation [64]. The cationic biopolymer of the chitosan-generated NH3+ group (pronoted) electrostatically interacts with the negatively charged pathogenic bacteria cell wall, where positively charged amine groups cause changes in the cell wall membrane structure and produce internal osmotic imbalances to cause cell death [65].

4. Conclusions

In this study, we explored the antimicrobial properties of the hybrid CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite in terms of inhibiting bacterial cell wall growth and inactivating bacterial cells. The characteristics of the CS/ZnO nanocomposite underwent significant changes upon the introduction of Ni particles. The resulting material displayed a uniform rod-like morphology, a well-defined crystal structure, and a specific surface area of 323.9476 m2/g. We observed increased UV absorption and reduced band-gap energy, contributing to enhanced antibacterial and anticancer activities.
In comparison to the CS/ZnO nanocomposite, the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite exhibited significantly higher antibacterial activity. This difference can be attributed to the alteration of the basal spacing of ZnO caused by the introduction of Ni, resulting in the generation of a higher number of reactive oxygen species. Notably, the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite demonstrated pronounced cytotoxicity with a half-maximum inhibitory concentration of approximately 80 ± 0.23 µg mL−1 against MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines, highlighting its potential applications across various fields.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.J.; methodology, H.C.; software, H.C.; validation, S.J. and N.A.; formal analysis and investigation, S.J.; resources, N.A.; data curation, H.C.; writing—original draft preparation, S.J. and H.C.; writing—review and editing, S.J. and N.A.; visualization, H.C.; supervision, S.J.; project administration, S.J.; funding acquisition, N.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded through the Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSPD2023R940), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are included in this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSPD2023R940), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sheshala, R.; Madheswaran, T.; Panneerselvam, J.; Vora, L.; Thakur, R.R.S. Stimuli-responsive nanomaterials in infectious diseases. In Nanotheranostics for Treatment and Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 151–198. [Google Scholar]
  2. Anagha, B.; George, D.; Maheswari, P.U.; Begum, K.M.M.S. Biomass Derived Antimicrobial Hybrid Cellulose Hydrogel with Green ZnO Nanoparticles for Curcumin Delivery and Its Kinetic Modelling. J. Polym. Environ. 2019, 27, 2054–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Raghupathi, K.R.; Koodali, R.T.; Manna, A.C. Size-Dependent Bacterial Growth Inhibition and Mechanism of Antibacterial Activity of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles. Langmuir 2011, 27, 4020–4028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bonetta, S.; Bonetta, S.; Motta, F.; Strini, A.; Carraro, E. Photocatalytic Bacterial Inactivation by TiO2-Coated Surfaces. AMB Express 2013, 3, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lin, Y.-C.; Chang, C.-H. In Vitro Inhibition of Enterovirus 71 Infection with a Nickel Ion/Chitosan Microcomposite. Virus Res. 2014, 190, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kumar, M. A Review of Chitin and Chitosan Applications. React. Funct. Polym. 2000, 46, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sahariah, P.; Másson, M. Antimicrobial Chitosan and Chitosan Derivatives: A Review of the Structure–Activity Relationship. Biomacromolecules 2017, 18, 3846–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shahidi, F.; Arachchi, J.K.V.; Jeon, Y.-J. Food Applications of Chitin and Chitosans. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1999, 10, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cheah, W.Y.; Show, P.-L.; Ng, I.-S.; Lin, G.-Y.; Chiu, C.-Y.; Chang, Y.-K. Antibacterial Activity of Quaternized Chitosan Modified Nanofiber Membrane. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 126, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pellá, M.C.G.; Lima-Tenório, M.K.; Tenório-Neto, E.T.; Guilherme, M.R.; Muniz, E.C.; Rubira, A.F. Chitosan-Based Hydrogels: From Preparation to Biomedical Applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 196, 233–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Malakootian, M.; Nasiri, A.; Mahdizadeh, H. Preparation of CoFe2O4/Activated Carbon@chitosan as a New Magnetic Nanobiocomposite for Adsorption of Ciprofloxacin in Aqueous Solutions. Water Sci. Technol. 2018, 78, 2158–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mahvi, A.; Malakootian, M.; Fatehizadeh, A.; Ehrampoush, M. Nitrate Removal from Aqueous Solutions by Nanofiltration. Desalin. Water Treat. 2011, 29, 326–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Height, M.; Pratsinis, S.; Mekasuwandumrong, O.; Praserthdam, P. Ag–ZnO Catalysts for UV-Photodegradation of Methylene Blue. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2006, 63, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bhuvaneshwari, M.; Iswarya, V.; Archanaa, S.; Madhu, G.M.; Kumar, G.K.S.; Nagarajan, R.; Chandrasekaran, N.; Mukherjee, A. Cytotoxicity of ZnO NPs towards Fresh Water Algae Scenedesmus Obliquus at Low Exposure Concentrations in UV-C, Visible and Dark Conditions. Aquat. Toxicol. 2015, 162, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sirelkhatim, A.; Mahmud, S.; Seeni, A.; Kaus, N.H.M.; Ann, L.C.; Bakhori, S.K.M.; Hasan, H.; Mohamad, D. Review on Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: Antibacterial Activity and Toxicity Mechanism. Nanomicro Lett. 2015, 7, 219–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lee, S.J.; Begildayeva, T.; Jung, H.J.; Koutavarapu, R.; Yu, Y.; Choi, M.; Choi, M.Y. Plasmonic ZnO/Au/g-C3N4 Nanocomposites as Solar Light Active Photocatalysts for Degradation of Organic Contaminants in Wastewater. Chemosphere 2021, 263, 128262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Malakootian, M.; Nasiri, A.; Asadipour, A.; Kargar, E. Facile and Green Synthesis of ZnFe2O4@CMC as a New Magnetic Nanophotocatalyst for Ciprofloxacin Degradation from Aqueous Media. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2019, 129, 138–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gordon, T.; Perlstein, B.; Houbara, O.; Felner, I.; Banin, E.; Margel, S. Synthesis and Characterization of Zinc/Iron Oxide Composite Nanoparticles and Their Antibacterial Properties. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2011, 374, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Marcous, A.; Rasouli, S.; Ardestani, F. Low-Density Polyethylene Films Loaded by Titanium Dioxide and Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles as a New Active Packaging System against Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Fresh Calf Minced Meat: Active Packaging against Escherichia coli in Fresh Calf Minced Meat. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2017, 30, 2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sathiya, S.M.; Okram, G.; Dhivya, S.; Manivannan, G.; Jothi Rajan, M. Interaction of Chitosan/Zinc Oxide Nanocomposites and Their Antibacterial Activities with Escherichia Coli. Mater. Today Proc. 2016, 3, 3855–3860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Johar, M.; Afzal, R.A.; Alazba, P.; Manzoor, U. Photocatalysis and Bandgap Engineering Using ZnO Nanocomposites. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 2015, 934587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bhuyan, T.; Mishra, K.; Khanuja, M.; Prasad, R.; Varma, A. Biosynthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles from Azadirachta Indica for Antibacterial and Photocatalytic Applications. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2015, 32, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhao, J.; Wang, L.; Yan, X.; Yang, Y.; Lei, Y.; Zhou, J.; Huang, Y.; Yousong, G.; Zhang, Y. Structure and Photocatalytic Activity of Ni-Doped ZnO Nanorods. Mater. Res. Bull. 2011, 46, 1207–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chang, C.-J.; Lin, C.-Y.; Hsu, M.-H. Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of Ce-Doped ZnO Nanorods under UV and Visible Light. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2014, 45, 1954–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fifere, N.; Airinei, A.; Timpu, D.; Rotaru, A.; Sacarescu, L.; Ursu, L. New Insights into Structural and Magnetic Properties of Ce Doped ZnO Nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 757, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Raja, K.; Ramesh, P.S.; Geetha, D. Structural, FTIR and Photoluminescence Studies of Fe Doped ZnO Nanopowder by Co-Precipitation Method. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2014, 131, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lyu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Sun, Z.; Sui, X.; Hu, Y.; Liu, X. Reactivation of the spent Ni/ZnO-based adsorbent with enhanced initial activity for gasoline desulfurization. Fuel 2023, 333, 126315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Irwin, M.D.; Buchholz, D.B.; Hains, A.W.; Chang, R.P.H.; Marks, T.J. P-Type Semiconducting Nickel Oxide as an Efficiency-Enhancing Anode Interfacial Layer in Polymer Bulk-Heterojunction Solar Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 2783–2787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Koutavarapu, R.; Tamtam, M.R.; Myla, C.R.; Cho, M.; Shim, J. Enhanced Solar-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Properties of Novel Z-Scheme Binary BiPO4 Nanorods Anchored onto NiFe2O4 Nanoplates: Efficient Removal of Toxic Organic Pollutants. J. Environ. Sci. 2021, 102, 326–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Reddy, C.V.; Koutavarapu, R.; Reddy, K.R.; Shetti, N.P.; Aminabhavi, T.M.; Shim, J. Z-Scheme Binary 1D ZnWO4 Nanorods Decorated 2D NiFe2O4 Nanoplates as Photocatalysts for High Efficiency Photocatalytic Degradation of Toxic Organic Pollutants from Wastewater. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 268, 110677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kant, S. A Comparative Analysis of Structural, Optical And Photocatalytic Properties Of ZnO And Ni Doped ZnO Nanospheres Prepared by Sol Gel Method. Adv. Mater. Lett. 2012, 3, 350–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Saad, A.M.; Abukhadra, M.R.; Abdel-Kader Ahmed, S.; Elzanaty, A.M.; Mady, A.H.; Betiha, M.A.; Shim, J.-J.; Rabie, A.M. Photocatalytic Degradation of Malachite Green Dye Using Chitosan Supported ZnO and Ce–ZnO Nano-Flowers under Visible Light. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 258, 110043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Matai, I.; Sachdev, A.; Dubey, P.; Kumar, S.U.; Bhushan, B.; Gopinath, P. Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Ag-ZnO Nanocomposite on S. Aureus and GFP-Expressing Antibiotic Resistant E. coli. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2014, 115, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gholami, M.; Shirzad-Siboni, M.; Yang, J.-K. Application of Ni-Doped ZnO Rods for the Degradation of an Azo Dye from Aqueous Solutions. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2016, 33, 812–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nguyen, D.M.; Bach, L.G.; Bui, Q.B. Hierarchical Nanosheets Based on Zinc-Doped Nickel Hydroxide Attached 3D Framework as Free-Standing Nonenzymatic Sensor for Sensitive Glucose Detection. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019, 837, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Boura-Theodoridou, O.; Giannakas, A.; Katapodis, P.; Stamatis, H.; Ladavos, A.; Barkoula, N.-M. Performance of ZnO/Chitosan Nanocomposite Films for Antimicrobial Packaging Applications as a Function of NaOH Treatment and Glycerol/PVOH Blending. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 23, 100456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Javadian, H.; Ruiz, M.; Saleh, T.A.; Sastre, A.M. Ca-Alginate/Carboxymethyl Chitosan/Ni0.2Zn0.2Fe2.6O4 Magnetic Bionanocomposite: Synthesis, Characterization and Application for Single Adsorption of Nd+3, Tb+3, and Dy+3 Rare Earth Elements from Aqueous Media. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 306, 112760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Khan, Z. Chitosan Capped Au@Pd@Ag Trimetallic Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Stability, Capping Action and Adsorbing Activities. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 153, 545–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhu, M.; Liu, X.; Tan, L.; Cui, Z.; Liang, Y.; Li, Z.; Kwok Yeung, K.W.; Wu, S. Photo-Responsive Chitosan/Ag/MoS2 for Rapid Bacteria-Killing. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 383, 121122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kongarapu, R.J.; Mahamallik, P.; Pal, A. Surfactant Modification of Chitosan Hydrogel Beads for Ni@NiO Core-Shell Nanoparticles Formation and Its Catalysis to 4-Nitrophenol Reduction. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 1321–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ai, H.; Huang, X.; Zhu, Z.; Liu, J.; Chi, Q.; Li, Y.; Li, Z.; Ji, X. A Novel Glucose Sensor Based on Monodispersed Ni/Al Layered Double Hydroxide and Chitosan. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2008, 24, 1048–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pradeev Raj, K.; Sadaiyandi, K.; Kennedy, A.; Sagadevan, S.; Chowdhury, Z.Z.; Johan, M.R.B.; Aziz, F.A.; Rafique, R.F.; Thamiz Selvi, R.; Rathina Bala, R. Influence of Mg Doping on ZnO Nanoparticles for Enhanced Photocatalytic Evaluation and Antibacterial Analysis. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Taghavi Fardood, S.; Ramazani, A.; Moradi, S. A Novel Green Synthesis of Nickel Oxide Nanoparticles Using Arabic Gum. Chem. J. Mold. 2017, 12, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bokare, A.; Pai, M.; Athawale, A.A. Surface Modified Nd Doped TiO2 Nanoparticles as Photocatalysts in UV and Solar Light Irradiation. Sol. Energy 2013, 91, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liao, W.; Gu, A.; Liang, G.; Yuan, L. New High Performance Transparent UV-Curable Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Grafted ZnO/Silicone-Acrylate Resin Composites with Simultaneously Improved Integrated Performance. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2012, 396, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dutta, P.; Dutta, J.; Tripathi, V. Chitin and Chitosan: Chemistry, Properties and Applications. J. Sci. Indus. Res. 2003, 63, 20–31. [Google Scholar]
  47. George, D.; Maheswari, P.U.; Begum, K.M.M.S. Chitosan-Cellulose Hydrogel Conjugated with L-Histidine and Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles for Sustained Drug Delivery: Kinetics and in-Vitro Biological Studies. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 236, 116101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, X.; Hu, Q.; Fang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, B. Magnetic Chitosan Nanocomposites: A Useful Recyclable Tool for Heavy Metal Ion Removal. Langmuir 2009, 25, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Aljawf, R.N.; Rahman, F.; Kumar, S. Defects/Vacancies Engineering and Ferromagnetic Behavior in Pure ZnO and ZnO Doped with Co Nanoparticles. Mater. Res. Bull. 2016, 83, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mohamed, R.M.; Aazam, E.S. Preparation and Characterization of Core–Shell Polyaniline/Mesoporous Cu2O Nanocomposites for the Photocatalytic Oxidation of Thiophene. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2014, 480, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Karthik, R.; Thambidurai, S. Synthesis of Cobalt Doped ZnO/Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanorods as Active Material for Heavy Metal Ions Sensor and Antibacterial Activity. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 715, 254–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Eshaghi, A.; Hakimi, M.J.; Zali, A. Fabrication of Titanium Zinc Oxide (TZO) Sol–Gel Derived Nanostructured Thin Film and Investigation of Its Optical and Electrical Properties. Optik 2015, 126, 5610–5613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hu, D.; Liu, X.; Deng, S.; Liu, Y.; Feng, Z.; Han, B.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y. Structural and Optical Properties of Mn-Doped ZnO Nanocrystalline Thin Films with the Different Dopant Concentrations. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2014, 61, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rasoulzadehzali, M.; Namazi, H. Facile Preparation of Antibacterial Chitosan/Graphene Oxide-Ag Bio-Nanocomposite Hydrogel Beads for Controlled Release of Doxorubicin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 116, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Adekunle, A.; Oyekunle, J.; Oluwafemi, O.; Joshua, A.; Makinde, O.; Ogunfowokan, A.; Eleruja, M.; Ebenso, E. Comparative Catalytic Properties of Ni(OH)2 and NiO Nanoparticles Towards the Degradation of Nitrite (NO2−) and Nitric Oxide (NO). Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2014, 9, 3008–3021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Prabakar, C.; Muthukumaran, S.; Raja, V. Structural, Magnetic and Photoluminescence Behavior of Ni/Fe Doped ZnO Nanostructures Prepared by Co-Precipitation Method. Optik 2020, 202, 163714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Khan, K.; Tareen, A.K.; Li, J.; Khan, U.; Nairan, A.; Yuan, Y.; Xuyang, Z.; Yang, M.; Ouyang, Z. Facile Synthesis of Tin Doped Mayenite Electride Composite as a Non-Noble Metal, Durable Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction (ORR). Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 13498–13506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sheela, J.; Lakshmanan, S.; Manikandan, D.; Arul Antony, S. Structural, Morphological and Optical Properties of ZnO, ZnO:Ni2+ and ZnO:Co2+ Nanostructures by Hydrothermal Process and Their Photocatalytic Activity. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2018, 28, 2388–2398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Luo, J.; Jiang, S.; Zhang, H.; Jiang, J.; Liu, X. A Novel Non-Enzymatic Glucose Sensor Based on Cu Nanoparticle Modified Graphene Sheets Electrode. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 709, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Umeshbabu, E.; Rajeshkhanna, G.; Justin, P.; Rao, G.R. NiCo2O4/RGO Hybrid Nanostructures for Efficient Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2016, 20, 2725–2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ravichandran, K.; Nithiyadevi, K.; Sakthivel, B.; Arun, T.; Sindhuja, E.; Muruganandam, G. Synthesis of ZnO:Co/RGO Nanocomposites for Enhanced Photocatalytic and Antibacterial Activities. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 17539–17550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Naqvi QU, A.; Kanwal, A.; Qaseem, S.; Naeem, M.; Ali, S.R.; Shaffique, M.; Maqbool, M. Size-dependent inhibition of bacterial growth by chemically engineered spherical ZnO nanoparticles. J. Biol. Phys. 2019, 45, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ravichandran, K.; Snega, S.; Jabena Begum, N.; Swaminathan, K.; Sakthivel, B.; Rene Christena, L.; Chandramohan, G.; Ochiai, S. Enhancement in the Antibacterial Efficiency of ZnO Nanopowders by Tuning the Shape of the Nanograins through Fluorine Doping. Superlattices Microstruct. 2014, 69, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dutta, R.K.; Nenavathu, B.P.; Gangishetty, M.K.; Reddy, A.V.R. Studies on Antibacterial Activity of ZnO Nanoparticles by ROS Induced Lipid Peroxidation. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2012, 94, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Goy, R.; Britto, D.; Assis, O. A Review of the Antimicrobial Activity of Chitosan. Polim. Cienc. E Tecnol. 2009, 19, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomimetics 08 00518 sch001
Scheme 1. Schematic representation of Ni doped Zn(OH)2 complex preparation (a) Polymeric chitosan with Ni doped ZnO nanocomposites (b).
Scheme 1. Schematic representation of Ni doped Zn(OH)2 complex preparation (a) Polymeric chitosan with Ni doped ZnO nanocomposites (b).
Biomimetics 08 00518 sch001
Biomimetics 08 00518 g001
Figure 1. XRD patterns of (a) the pristine ZnO, (b) CS/ZnO binary composite, (c) pristine NiO, (d) Ni-doped ZnO and (e) ternary hybrid nanostructure of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of (a) the pristine ZnO, (b) CS/ZnO binary composite, (c) pristine NiO, (d) Ni-doped ZnO and (e) ternary hybrid nanostructure of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO.
Biomimetics 08 00518 g001
Biomimetics 08 00518 g002
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of (a) ZnO, (b) CS-ZnO, (c) NiO, (d) Ni-doped ZnO and (e) CS/Ni-doped ZnO.
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of (a) ZnO, (b) CS-ZnO, (c) NiO, (d) Ni-doped ZnO and (e) CS/Ni-doped ZnO.
Biomimetics 08 00518 g002
Biomimetics 08 00518 g003
Figure 3. The UV-Vis-NIR spectra peak of (a) ZnO, (b) CS/ZnO, (c) NiO, (d) Ni-doped ZnO and (e) CS/Ni-doped ZnO.
Figure 3. The UV-Vis-NIR spectra peak of (a) ZnO, (b) CS/ZnO, (c) NiO, (d) Ni-doped ZnO and (e) CS/Ni-doped ZnO.
Biomimetics 08 00518 g003
Biomimetics 08 00518 g004aBiomimetics 08 00518 g004b
Figure 4. SEM images: (a) pristine ZnO; (b) aggregated NPs and CS/ZnO; (c) particles that also exhibit agglomerated grain structure; (d) Ni-doped ZnO; (e) ternary structure of CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite; (f) 100 nm magnification of CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite exhibits a rod-like structure.
Figure 4. SEM images: (a) pristine ZnO; (b) aggregated NPs and CS/ZnO; (c) particles that also exhibit agglomerated grain structure; (d) Ni-doped ZnO; (e) ternary structure of CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite; (f) 100 nm magnification of CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite exhibits a rod-like structure.
Biomimetics 08 00518 g004aBiomimetics 08 00518 g004b
Biomimetics 08 00518 g005aBiomimetics 08 00518 g005b
Figure 5. The synthesized materials of (a) ZnO; (b) CS/ZnO; (c) NiO; (d) Ni-doped ZnO; (e) CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite were measured using nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms.
Figure 5. The synthesized materials of (a) ZnO; (b) CS/ZnO; (c) NiO; (d) Ni-doped ZnO; (e) CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite were measured using nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms.
Biomimetics 08 00518 g005aBiomimetics 08 00518 g005b
Biomimetics 08 00518 g006
Figure 6. Electrochemical impedance measurements of (a) ZnO, (b) CS/ZnO, (c) NiO, (d) Ni-doped ZnO and (e) CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite modified electrodes.
Figure 6. Electrochemical impedance measurements of (a) ZnO, (b) CS/ZnO, (c) NiO, (d) Ni-doped ZnO and (e) CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite modified electrodes.
Biomimetics 08 00518 g006
Biomimetics 08 00518 g007
Figure 7. Cyclic voltammograms curves of (a) ZnO, (b) CS/ZnO, (c) NiO, (d) Ni-doped ZnO and (e) CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite-modified electrodes.
Figure 7. Cyclic voltammograms curves of (a) ZnO, (b) CS/ZnO, (c) NiO, (d) Ni-doped ZnO and (e) CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite-modified electrodes.
Biomimetics 08 00518 g007
Biomimetics 08 00518 g008
Figure 8. Antibacterial activity mechanism of CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite.
Figure 8. Antibacterial activity mechanism of CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite.
Biomimetics 08 00518 g008
Biomimetics 08 00518 g009
Figure 9. MTT assay of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite in MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines.
Figure 9. MTT assay of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite in MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines.
Biomimetics 08 00518 g009
Biomimetics 08 00518 g010
Figure 10. The cytotoxicity effect of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite in MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines. (A) control (B) treated.
Figure 10. The cytotoxicity effect of the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposite in MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines. (A) control (B) treated.
Biomimetics 08 00518 g010
Table 1. The results of the BET analysis for ZnO, CS/ZnO, NiO, Ni-doped ZnO and CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposites.
Table 1. The results of the BET analysis for ZnO, CS/ZnO, NiO, Ni-doped ZnO and CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposites.
Sample NameSurface Area (m2g−1)Pore Volume (cm3g−1)Pore Size (nm)
ZnO32.2599 m2/g0.064018 cm3/g6.17461 nm
CS/ZnO45.8004 m2/g0.163342 cm3/g8.60041 nm
NiO17.5387 m2/g0.013045 cm3/g3.52548 nm
Ni-doped ZnO75.7213 m2/g0.316305 cm3/g11.67246 nm
CS/Ni-doped ZnO323.9476 m2/g1.473482 cm3/g18.19407 nm
Table 2. The charge transfer resistance values of ZnO, CS/ZnO, NiO, the Ni-doped ZnO and the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposites.
Table 2. The charge transfer resistance values of ZnO, CS/ZnO, NiO, the Ni-doped ZnO and the CS/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposites.
Sample NameRct (Ω)
ZnO56.64
CS/ZnO41.14
NiO57.56
Ni-doped ZnO29.24
CS/Ni-doped ZnO18.26
Table 3. Zone of inhibition of CS/Ni-doped ZnO against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
Table 3. Zone of inhibition of CS/Ni-doped ZnO against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
CS/Ni Doped ZnOZone of Inhibition
SamplesS. aureusL. monocytogensB. subtilisE. coliP. vulgarisV. parahemolyticus
25 µl16 mm16 mm17 mm16 mm17 mm12 mm
50 µl15 mm17 mm16 mm17 mm16 mm14 mm
75 µl15 mm17 mm17 mm17 mm19 mm16 mm
100 µl16 mm18 mm18 mm18 mm19 mm17 mm
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jeyachandran, S.; Chellapandian, H.; Ali, N. Advancements in Composite Materials and Their Expanding Role in Biomedical Applications. Biomimetics 2023, 8, 518. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8070518

AMA Style

Jeyachandran S, Chellapandian H, Ali N. Advancements in Composite Materials and Their Expanding Role in Biomedical Applications. Biomimetics. 2023; 8(7):518. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8070518

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jeyachandran, Sivakamavalli, Hethesh Chellapandian, and Nemat Ali. 2023. "Advancements in Composite Materials and Their Expanding Role in Biomedical Applications" Biomimetics 8, no. 7: 518. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8070518

APA Style

Jeyachandran, S., Chellapandian, H., & Ali, N. (2023). Advancements in Composite Materials and Their Expanding Role in Biomedical Applications. Biomimetics, 8(7), 518. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8070518

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop