Next Article in Journal
A Computational Model of Hybrid Trunk-like Robots for Synergy Formation in Anticipation of Physical Interaction
Next Article in Special Issue
Extend Plastron Longevity on Superhydrophobic Surface Using Gas Soluble and Gas Permeable Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)
Previous Article in Journal
A Decomposition-Based Evolutionary Algorithm with Neighborhood Region Domination
Previous Article in Special Issue
One-Step Fabrication Process of Silica–Titania Superhydrophobic UV-Blocking Thin Coatings onto Polymeric Films
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Tuning Wetting Properties Through Surface Geometry in the Cassie–Baxter State

Biomimetics 2025, 10(1), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10010020
by Talya Scheff, Florence Acha, Nathalia Diaz Armas, Joey L. Mead and Jinde Zhang *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Biomimetics 2025, 10(1), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10010020
Submission received: 21 November 2024 / Revised: 29 December 2024 / Accepted: 31 December 2024 / Published: 2 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Superhydrophobic Surfaces: Challenges, Solutions and Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors investigated the impact of surface geometry on the static, dynamic, and sliding contact angle in the Cassie-Baxter state. This research is very important for understanding the tuning wetting properties by adjusting surface geometry. Generally, the experiments are thoroughly investigated, and the experimental results are good. Thus, I recommend its publication in Biomimetics after answering the following questions:

 

(1) In Figures, the terms ‘Receding angle’ and ‘Advancing angle’ are suggested to be revised as ‘Receding contact angle’ and ‘Advancing contact angle’.

(2) The authors said in the text, ‘The Cassie-Baxter model accurately predicted receding angles but struggled to predict advancing angles’ and ‘These insights in this work can guide the development of coatings with enhanced superhydrophobic properties’. It can be found in some literature (Langmuir, 2022, 38, 18-35) that the enhanced superhydrophobic properties not only correlates with surface geometry, but also is related with the Young’s modulus of substrates. I suggest that the authors can discuss the enhanced superhydrophobic property of elastic substrates in the Conclusion Part, which may be related with the experimental results.

Have a good luck.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The quality of the presentation should be improved. 

(1) The humidity and temperature during contact angle measurements should be reported, since even lotus leaf is not super-hydrophobic (see, Cheng and Rodak, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1895487) when water is condensed on the lotus leaf.  

(2) "Linear solid" should be defined.

(3) Figures 3 and 4 are not discussed in the text. 

(4) "Derivation of Equations" is inaccurate since the authors did not derive the equations, but simply stated them without providing references. 

Author Response

please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop