Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Occupational Tasks on Firefighter Hydration During a Live Structural Fire
Next Article in Special Issue
Summary of Indiana Farm Fatalities Involving Individuals 55 Years and Older—1988–2017
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of a Road Safety Education Program Based on Driving Under Influence and Traffic Risks for Higher Secondary School Students in Belgium
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identifying Safety Training Resource Needs in the Cattle Feeding Industry in the Midwestern United States
Open AccessArticle

Determinants of Safety Climate in the Professional Logging Industry

1
Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
2
Division of Safety Research, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Safety 2019, 5(2), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/safety5020035
Received: 16 March 2019 / Revised: 7 May 2019 / Accepted: 13 May 2019 / Published: 27 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Agricultural Safety and Health)
Work involving forest logging is considered one of the most dangerous occupations in the world. In the intermountain region of Montana and Idaho in the United States, the extreme terrain, remote location and severe weather conditions escalate risk. Although safety has improved through the development of mechanized equipment, logging tasks continue to be very hazardous. Thus, as with leading companies in other occupational sectors, logging enterprises are beginning to consider safety climate as a useful measure in their safety systems. The purpose of this study was to quantify safety climate within the logging industry of Montana, USA and to identify specific determinants of safety climate. A demographic, musculoskeletal symptom (MSS), and safety climate survey (NOSACQ-50) was administered to 743 professional loggers. Analyses were conducted to determine the association between demographic characteristics, MSS, workplace variables and the scores on five safety climate dimensions (management safety priority and ability, workers’ safety commitment, workers’ safety priority and risk non-acceptance, peer safety communication, learning and trust in safety ability, and workers’ trust in efficacy of safety systems). Variables identified as predictors of safety climate included logging system type, supervisory status, age, years of experience and reported MSS. As safety climate is a leading indicator of workplace safety, if work groups with the lowest safety climate scores can be identified, they could receive targeted safety intervention programs or resources; thereby directing resources to the groups who need it the most, without relying on lagging indicators such as injury and fatality rates. View Full-Text
Keywords: safety culture; NOSACQ-50; musculoskeletal symptoms; safety commitment; missed work safety culture; NOSACQ-50; musculoskeletal symptoms; safety commitment; missed work
MDPI and ACS Style

Lagerstrom, E.; Magzamen, S.; Kines, P.; Brazile, W.; Rosecrance, J. Determinants of Safety Climate in the Professional Logging Industry. Safety 2019, 5, 35.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop