Next Article in Journal
Establishing Training and Certification Criteria for Visual Observers of Unmanned Aircraft Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Injuries and Fatalities in Danish Commercial Fishing Fleet in 1998–2016
Article Menu
Issue 2 (June) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Safety 2018, 4(2), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/safety4020014

North American Engineering, Procurement, Fabrication and Construction Worker Safety Climate Perception Affected by Job Position

1
Department of Environmental Health Science, College of Health Science, Eastern Kentucky University, Dizney 215, 521 Lancaster Avenue, Richmond, KY 40475, USA
2
Plycem USA, LLC, 1001 West Industrial Drive, Terre Haute, IN 47802, USA
3
Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Science, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 7411 John Smith Drive, Suite 1124, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 19 January 2018 / Revised: 22 March 2018 / Accepted: 28 March 2018 / Published: 4 April 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [251 KB, uploaded 3 May 2018]

Abstract

Understanding and implementing the results of Safety Climate surveys can assist in decreasing occupational injuries and illnesses. The following article presents findings of a cross-sectional study that assessed the relationship between safety climate perceptions and job position among engineering, procurement, fabrication and construction (EPFC) employees using a 15-item survey. Descriptive statistics (means and frequencies) and an ANACOVA (analysis of covariance) were performed on a saturated model. The study had a 62% response rate. Results indicate a statistically significant in mean safety climate scores between job position among EPFC employees when controlling for years in industry and location type (i.e., construction versus fabrication) [F (9, 603) = 5.28, p < 0.0001, adjusted R-square = 0.07]. Employee perception of safety climate differed based on the employee’s job position (i.e., laborer, foreman, etc.). Project management reported the highest safety climate scores (0.91), followed by supervisors (0.86), technical support employees and foremen (0.84) and laborers (0.81). View Full-Text
Keywords: EPFC; safety climate; job position; worksite subcultures EPFC; safety climate; job position; worksite subcultures
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Pinion, C.; Klyza, J., Jr.; Brewer, S.; Douphrate, D. North American Engineering, Procurement, Fabrication and Construction Worker Safety Climate Perception Affected by Job Position. Safety 2018, 4, 14.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Safety EISSN 2313-576X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top