This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Assessing the Potential Impact of Fugitive Methane Emissions on Offshore Platform Safety
by
Stuart N. Riddick
Stuart N. Riddick 1,2,*
,
Mercy Mbua
Mercy Mbua 2
,
Catherine Laughery
Catherine Laughery 2 and
Daniel J. Zimmerle
Daniel J. Zimmerle 2
1
Department of Science, Engineering and Aviation, University of the Highlands and Islands Perth, Crieff Road, Perth PH1 2NX, UK
2
Methane Emission Technology Evaluation Center (METEC), Energy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Safety 2025, 11(4), 115; https://doi.org/10.3390/safety11040115 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 19 September 2025
/
Revised: 8 November 2025
/
Accepted: 19 November 2025
/
Published: 24 November 2025
Abstract
One of the biggest risks to safety on offshore platform safety is the ignition of high-pressure natural gas streams. Currently, the size and number of fugitive emissions on offshore platforms is unknown and methods used to detect fugitives have significant shortcomings. To investigate the frequency, size, and potential impact of fugitives, a data collection exercise was conducted using incidents reported, leak survey data, and independent measurements. The size and number of fugitives on offshore facilities were simulated to investigate likely areas of safety concern. Incident reports indicate in 2021 there were 113 reports of gas leaks on 1119 offshore facilities, suggesting 0.02 fugitives per Type 1 facility (older, shallow-water platforms) and 0.31 fugitives per Type 2 facility (larger deeper-water facilities). Leak survey data report 12 fugitives per Type 1 facility (average emission 0.6 kg CH4 h−1 leak−1) and 15 fugitives per Type 2 facility (average emission 1.5 kg CH4 h−1 leak−1). Reconciliation of direct measurements with a bottom-up model suggests that the number of fugitive emissions generated from the leak report data is an underestimate for Type 1 platforms (44 fugitives facility−1; average emission 0.6 kg CH4 h−1 leak−1) and in general agreement for the Type 2 platforms (15 fugitives facility−1; average emission 1.5 kg CH4 h−1 leak−1). Analysis of the fugitive emission rates on an offshore platform suggests that gas will not collect to explosive concentration if any air movement is present (>0.36 mph); however, large volumes of air (~600 m3) near representative leaks on the working deck could become explosive in hour-long zero-wind conditions. We suggest that wearable technology could be employed to indicate gas build up, safety regulations amended to consider low-wind conditions and real-world experiments are conducted to test assumptions of air mixing on the working deck.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Riddick, S.N.; Mbua, M.; Laughery, C.; Zimmerle, D.J.
Assessing the Potential Impact of Fugitive Methane Emissions on Offshore Platform Safety. Safety 2025, 11, 115.
https://doi.org/10.3390/safety11040115
AMA Style
Riddick SN, Mbua M, Laughery C, Zimmerle DJ.
Assessing the Potential Impact of Fugitive Methane Emissions on Offshore Platform Safety. Safety. 2025; 11(4):115.
https://doi.org/10.3390/safety11040115
Chicago/Turabian Style
Riddick, Stuart N., Mercy Mbua, Catherine Laughery, and Daniel J. Zimmerle.
2025. "Assessing the Potential Impact of Fugitive Methane Emissions on Offshore Platform Safety" Safety 11, no. 4: 115.
https://doi.org/10.3390/safety11040115
APA Style
Riddick, S. N., Mbua, M., Laughery, C., & Zimmerle, D. J.
(2025). Assessing the Potential Impact of Fugitive Methane Emissions on Offshore Platform Safety. Safety, 11(4), 115.
https://doi.org/10.3390/safety11040115
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.