Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of 3D/2D Imaging and Image Processing Techniques for the Monitoring of Seed Imbibition
Next Article in Special Issue
LaBGen-P-Semantic: A First Step for Leveraging Semantic Segmentation in Background Generation
Previous Article in Journal
Automated Analysis of Spatially Resolved X-ray Scattering and Micro Computed Tomography of Artificial and Natural Enamel Carious Lesions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deep Learning with a Spatiotemporal Descriptor of Appearance and Motion Estimation for Video Anomaly Detection
Open AccessArticle

Full Reference Objective Quality Assessment for Reconstructed Background Images

School of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Imaging 2018, 4(6), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging4060082
Received: 16 May 2018 / Revised: 6 June 2018 / Accepted: 6 June 2018 / Published: 19 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Detection of Moving Objects)
With an increased interest in applications that require a clean background image, such as video surveillance, object tracking, street view imaging and location-based services on web-based maps, multiple algorithms have been developed to reconstruct a background image from cluttered scenes. Traditionally, statistical measures and existing image quality techniques have been applied for evaluating the quality of the reconstructed background images. Though these quality assessment methods have been widely used in the past, their performance in evaluating the perceived quality of the reconstructed background image has not been verified. In this work, we discuss the shortcomings in existing metrics and propose a full reference Reconstructed Background image Quality Index (RBQI) that combines color and structural information at multiple scales using a probability summation model to predict the perceived quality in the reconstructed background image given a reference image. To compare the performance of the proposed quality index with existing image quality assessment measures, we construct two different datasets consisting of reconstructed background images and corresponding subjective scores. The quality assessment measures are evaluated by correlating their objective scores with human subjective ratings. The correlation results show that the proposed RBQI outperforms all the existing approaches. Additionally, the constructed datasets and the corresponding subjective scores provide a benchmark to evaluate the performance of future metrics that are developed to evaluate the perceived quality of reconstructed background images. View Full-Text
Keywords: background reconstruction; image quality assessment; image dataset; subjective evaluation; perceptual quality; objective quality metric background reconstruction; image quality assessment; image dataset; subjective evaluation; perceptual quality; objective quality metric
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Shrotre, A.; Karam, L.J. Full Reference Objective Quality Assessment for Reconstructed Background Images. J. Imaging 2018, 4, 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging4060082

AMA Style

Shrotre A, Karam LJ. Full Reference Objective Quality Assessment for Reconstructed Background Images. Journal of Imaging. 2018; 4(6):82. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging4060082

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shrotre, Aditee; Karam, Lina J. 2018. "Full Reference Objective Quality Assessment for Reconstructed Background Images" J. Imaging 4, no. 6: 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging4060082

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop