Next Article in Journal
Circular Bioeconomy in Action: Collection and Recycling of Domestic Used Cooking Oil through a Social, Reverse Logistics System
Previous Article in Journal
The Use of Ca- and Mg-Rich Fly Ash as a Chemical Precipitant in the Simultaneous Removal of Nitrogen and Phosphorus—Recycling and Reuse
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Designing Away Waste: A Comparative Analysis of Urban Reuse and Remanufacture Initiatives

1
Department of Environmental Technology, Technische Universität Berlin, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
2
Department of Industrial and Materials Science, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden
3
Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Recycling 2019, 4(2), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling4020015
Received: 30 December 2018 / Revised: 26 March 2019 / Accepted: 28 March 2019 / Published: 3 April 2019
  |  
PDF [450 KB, uploaded 3 April 2019]
  |     |  

Abstract

In order to transform the economy into one that is circular, that recovers most materials through reuse, remanufacturing and recycling, these activities need to grow significantly. Waste management has substantially incorporated recycling as an end-of-life treatment but has still largely failed to incorporate remanufacturing and reuse as possible material recovery routes. This article aims to provide useful information to establish centers for urban remanufacture (CUREs), by analyzing fifteen existing initiatives that facilitate reuse and remanufacture by providing access to secondary materials or manufacturing tools. The study consists of a review of selected initiatives complemented with targeted interviews to fill in missing information. Most initiatives provided access to secondary materials (13 of 15 initiatives), and almost all used different manufacturing tools (14 of 15 initiatives). Besides their regular opening hours, initiatives were mainly engaged in capacity building activities, which were done through predefined or improvised workshops. Most initiatives relied on external support to finance their operations (9 of 15 initiatives). However, one of the self-financed initiatives is the oldest initiative in the study, operating since 1998. Based on the results and tacit knowledge collected in this study, a framework is suggested to serve as a guide for establishing future CUREs.
View Full-Text
Keywords: reuse; remanufacture; circular economy; maker movement; up-cycling; grass-root initiatives reuse; remanufacture; circular economy; maker movement; up-cycling; grass-root initiatives
Figures

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Ordóñez, I.; Rexfelt, O.; Hagy, S.; Unkrig, L. Designing Away Waste: A Comparative Analysis of Urban Reuse and Remanufacture Initiatives. Recycling 2019, 4, 15.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Recycling EISSN 2313-4321 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top