Next Article in Journal
Transforming Waste into Sustainable Construction Materials: Resistant Geopolymers from Recycled Sources
Previous Article in Journal
Microplastics, Antibiotics, and Heavy Metals in Anaerobic Digestion Systems: A Critical Review of Sources, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Assessment of the Impact of the Revised National E-Waste Framework on the Informal E-Waste Sector of Nigeria

by
Olusegun A. Odeyingbo
1,*,
Otmar K. Deubzer
2 and
Oluwatobi A. Ogunmokun
3
1
Department of Environmental Technology, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany
2
Sustainable SCYCLE, United Nations Institute for Training and Research, Platz der Vereinten Nationen 1, 53113 Bonn, Germany
3
Chester Business School, University of Chester, Chester CH4 7AD, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Recycling 2025, 10(3), 117; https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10030117
Submission received: 3 March 2025 / Revised: 14 April 2025 / Accepted: 28 April 2025 / Published: 12 June 2025

Abstract

E-Waste management in Nigeria remains predominantly informal, with unlicensed collectors focusing on extracting valuable materials, primarily for export. Despite policy interventions, including the revised 2022 E-Waste framework and the Global Environment Facility (GEF) project, which introduced collection centers in Lagos and bolstered Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), progress has been uneven. This comparative longitudinal study examined informal E-Waste processing practices over a six-year period (2017–2023) to evaluate the impact of these initiatives. Using a mixed-methods approach, including content analysis and field interviews with informal collectors, government officials, and NGOs, our findings reveal that profit is the primary motivator for informal collectors, while E-Waste fractions that are not considered profitable are often discarded in environmentally harmful ways. The findings indicate persistent noncompliance with regulations and stagnant or declining income levels for informal collectors. The revised 2022 regulation resulted in a significant increase in registrations, with EPRON recording its highest number of producers, with 39 in total, including 25.6% renewals and 74.4% new registrations. Although the revised framework and EPR efforts have achieved limited success, critical gaps in implementation and outreach remain, with minimal improvements in collectors’ awareness of health and environmental risks. This study underscores the need for targeted training and financial incentives to redirect E-Waste flows toward formal channels, thereby more effectively safeguarding the environment and wellbeing.
Keywords: extended producer responsibility; E-Waste; recycling; informal collectors; land pollution extended producer responsibility; E-Waste; recycling; informal collectors; land pollution

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Odeyingbo, O.A.; Deubzer, O.K.; Ogunmokun, O.A. Assessment of the Impact of the Revised National E-Waste Framework on the Informal E-Waste Sector of Nigeria. Recycling 2025, 10, 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10030117

AMA Style

Odeyingbo OA, Deubzer OK, Ogunmokun OA. Assessment of the Impact of the Revised National E-Waste Framework on the Informal E-Waste Sector of Nigeria. Recycling. 2025; 10(3):117. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10030117

Chicago/Turabian Style

Odeyingbo, Olusegun A., Otmar K. Deubzer, and Oluwatobi A. Ogunmokun. 2025. "Assessment of the Impact of the Revised National E-Waste Framework on the Informal E-Waste Sector of Nigeria" Recycling 10, no. 3: 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10030117

APA Style

Odeyingbo, O. A., Deubzer, O. K., & Ogunmokun, O. A. (2025). Assessment of the Impact of the Revised National E-Waste Framework on the Informal E-Waste Sector of Nigeria. Recycling, 10(3), 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10030117

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop