Next Article in Journal
COVID-19 Induced Changes in Residual Municipal Waste Management in Provincial Territories of the Marche Region (Italy): Flow Analysis and Environmental Assessment
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Potential for the Development of the Circular Industry in the Region: A New Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization and Property Evaluation of Glasses Made from Mine Tailings, Glass Waste, and Fluxes

by
Miguel Ángel Escobedo-Bretado
1,
Patricia Ponce-Peña
1,
Martha Poisot
2,
Alicia Rodríguez-Pulido
1,
Diola Marina Núñez-Ramírez
1,
Luis Alberto Bretado-Aragón
3,
René H. Lara
1,
Luis Medina-Torres
4,
Zoe V. Quiñones-Jurado
1,
Roberto Briones-Gallardo
5 and
María Azucena González-Lozano
1,*
1
Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Av. Veterinaria s/n, Circuito Universitario, Durango C.P. 34120, Mexico
2
Instituto de Química Aplicada, Universidad del Papaloapan, Circuito Central 200, Parque Industrial, Tuxtepec, Oax C.P. 68301, Mexico
3
Universidad de la Ciénega del Estado de Michoacán de Ocampo, Avenida Universidad 3000, Col. Lomas de la Universidad, Sahuayo C.P. 59103, Michoacán, Mexico
4
Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Escolar S/N, Coyoacán, Cd. Universitaria, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico
5
Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Avenida Sierra Leona 420, San Luis Potosí C.P. 78230, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Recycling 2025, 10(2), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10020039
Submission received: 9 January 2025 / Revised: 17 February 2025 / Accepted: 6 March 2025 / Published: 9 March 2025

Abstract

:
The present investigation introduces a novel approach, using As-Zn-Fe mining tailings (MT) and recycled bottle glass (cullet) to enable the manufacturing of a new glass for ornamental articles, with characteristics similar to those of soda–lime–silicate glass (SLS), and at the same time, immobilizing potentially toxic elements (PTEs) from mining tailings, which cause environmental pollution with severe risks to human health. The glass used was obtained from transparent glass bottles collected from urban waste, which were later washed to remove impurities and then crushed until they reached No. 70 mesh (212 μm) level; in the case of mining tailings, the sample used comes from the ore benefit process, with 96.8% of particles below the No. 50 mesh level (300 μm). Six mixtures were made by varying the composition of the mining tailings and glass, K2CO3 and H3BO3 as fluxes were also used in constant proportion. The mixtures were melted at 1370 °C, and later, the glass samples were cast on a steel plate at room temperature. The characteristics of the glasses were studied using thermal analysis (TA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Likewise, their chemical resistance in acid and basic media and density were evaluated. The results unequivocally demonstrate the feasibility of manufacturing glasses with a light green color, the increase in the content of mining tailings increased the apparent Tg from 625 to 831 °C. Glasses with 17 and 21.3% MT presented lower density values due to a better-polymerized glass structure, attributed to the increase in SiO2 and Al2O3 and the decrease in alkaline oxides, which allowed for the retention of PTEs in their structure.

1. Introduction

Mexico, a country rich in mineral resources, is a significant global player, ranking among the top ten producers of 16 different metals and the first silver producer worldwide [1]. However, the environmental impact of mining activity is a pressing concern. The large amount of waste generated by mining operations, such as tailings and slags, is a significant source of environmental pollution. The deposition of mine tailings, in particular, leads to the release of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) such as Pb, As, Zn, Cu, Cr, Ni, Co, Fe, and Cd, causing high ecological pollution [2,3,4]. This urgent environmental issue necessitates innovative solutions, such as the one presented in this research.
The historical deposition of large quantities of mining waste containing iron (Fe), arsenic (As), and lead (Pb) in semi-arid soils in Durango has led to a severe problem. The Comarca Lagunera, an economically important region between the states of Coahuila and Durango in northern Mexico, is now one of the areas with the highest accumulation of arsenic in the world. With its severe human health implications, this alarming situation underscores the urgent need to prioritize research efforts and find sustainable solutions [5,6].
On a more positive note, there has been a significant shift in the approach towards environmental protection. This shift has increased attention to the treatment, recycling, and safe use of mine tailings [7]. As a result, various innovative applications for mine tailings have been explored, such as their use in unpaved road bases, environmentally friendly bricks, partial replacement of cement, paste backfill, and ceramic articles [8,9,10,11,12]. These developments offer potential solutions to the environmental challenges posed by mining and inspire hope for a more sustainable future.
In this sense, vitrification is a valuable method for treating hazardous mining tailings because it provides a stable way to solidify industrial waste [2,9,13,14,15,16]. During vitrification, waste is transformed into glassy material to retain its toxic components, captured in the glassy matrix [9].
According to Terry Lay et al. [14], the development of formulations for vitrifying waste represents a challenge, as aspects such as (a) acceptability of the waste, (b) melt processability, (c) durability of the vitreous product, and (d) economics must be considered.
The main challenge in converting As-Zn-Fe mining tailings from Durango State into glassy materials is ensuring that the resulting product has good chemical stability thus immobilizing the PTEs, and can be processed at reasonably low temperatures (1350–1450 °C). Soda–lime–silicate glass (SLS) is a stable glass type commonly used in various applications. It can be recycled as waste glass to lower glass melting temperature, reducing energy consumption by up to 25% [17]. According to Baccarin and Bragança [18], the advantage of using waste glass resides in its chemical compatibility with the raw materials used in the ceramics industry, which has been an incentive to partially or fully replace the flux with this alternative source of alkalis. SLS has a strong glass-forming ability and can be used to vitrify tailings. A second challenging aim of this study was to recycle clear SLS bottles.
Likewise, the reason for choosing H3BO3 as flux results from the need to reduce the melting point of silica (usually 1730 °C) and as a component to minimize the leaching of PTEs. B2O3 is one of the best glass formers and has wide flexibility to accommodate various modifier oxides and for obtaining acceptable quality glasses for potential applications, such as borosilicate glasses for the immobilization of radioactive waste, shields for use in industrial and medical radiation facilities and laboratory glass [14,19,20]. On the other hand, the use of K2O from K2CO3 could ensure better chemical resistance behavior and would give a larger moldability range, due to the greater ionic volume of potassium [21].
Therefore, this research explores the feasibility of recycling As-Zn-Fe mining tailings and clear SLS to produce new light green-colored glass with good chemical resistance that allows PTE retention using the vitrification process. These results could provide a beneficial solution to the health and environment of Durango society.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Clear bottles of SLS urban waste glass were collected and washed with hot water. Then, the glass was crushed using a ceramic mill with porcelain balls as a grinding media and sieved to a particle size of 212 μm mesh.
Fifty samples of approximately 2 kg each of mining tailings from the silver ore concentration process were gathered from various locations in the tailings dam, mixed to ensure consistency, and then 5 kg as the representative sample was selected. The mine is located northeast of the state of Durango; however, due to company policies, its name cannot be revealed.

2.2. Glass Synthesis

Due to the high content of silica in raw materials (values of main oxides are presented in Table 1), typical fluxes such as alkaline earth oxides and B2O3 were found to be necessary to lower the melting temperature of the silicate glasses [14]. For that reason, reagents K2CO3 and H3BO3 (Fermont brand, purity > 99%) were used in the bath compositions to produce K2O and B2O3, respectively. The conventional melting–casting technique was employed to synthesize the glasses under study. The proportion of mining tailings was increased in the compositions while the waste glass decreased. The fluxes were consistently used in the same proportion for each composition, as shown in Table 2. The SLS glass was used as the reference glass (GR) for comparison. Therefore, the GR glass served as the same starting raw material.
The raw materials and fluxes were mixed and melted in a Pt crucible using an electrical furnace (Lindberg/Blue BF51433). First, the samples were heated up to 400 °C to decompose boric acid and prevent losses due to volatilization [22]. They were maintained at this temperature for 1 h, then heated to 1350 °C and held at that temperature for an additional hour. Finally, the glasses were cast onto a steel plate at room temperature.

2.3. Analytical Methods

Before use, the particle size range of the raw materials (MT and SLS glass) was determined using sieve analysis, and the results are shown in Figure 1 as can be seen, at least 90% of the particles have a size less than 180 μm for both materials.
Raw materials and samples underwent a comprehensive characterization using X-ray diffraction (XRD). Powder samples were placed in the sample holder of a Philips X’Pert-MPD, with Cu-Kα radiation of 1.5405 Å, from 10 to 90, 2θ degrees and scanning rate 2° per min. Results are shown in Figure 2. Likewise, MT were also analyzed for potentially toxic elements using an Agilent 4100 MP-AES Spectrometer, the results are presented in Table 3.
On the other hand, to understand the structural and microstructural characteristics, the glasses by infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were analyzed. These analyses provided significant insights into the composition and properties of the glasses. For FTIR analysis, a Perkin Elmer Frontier equipped with an ATR (attenuated total reflection) device covering the range from 2800 to 400 wavenumber (cm−1) was used to analyze a powdered glass sample (grounded in an agate mortar). For XRD analyses, glass powder sieved at a particle size less than 212 μm was placed in the sample holder of a Bruker, D8 Advance equipment, with copper anode and CuKα radiation of 1.5405 Å, from 5 to 90, 2θ degrees and scanning rate 2° per min. SEM examined glass microstructure (Jeol microscope JSM-6610 equipped with an EDS detector, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The sample, a piece of each glass, was mounted into quick setting resin, then sandpapered of different grains (80, 120, 240, 320, 500, 800, 1200, and 2400), subsequently were diamond-paste polished, and lastly, were Au-coated to make them conductive. Likewise, to know the thermal characteristics of each glass, differential thermal analysis (DTA, Netzsch STA 449 F1 Jupiter) was carried out from room temperature up to 1000 °C using an N2 atmosphere and a heating rate of 10 °C/min. Inflection point method was used for determination of glass transition temperature (Tg), and the crystallization temperature (Tc) was taken as the higher point of each peak.
Furthermore, the chemical resistance of each glass and reference glass (GR) was evaluated in acid and basic media, in strict accordance with Russian standard GOST 10134-82 [23], using HCl 1N and NaOH 1N solutions, respectively. First, a known quantity of grounded glasses was put into PE bottles with a corresponding solution in a 1:10 (powder: solution) ratio. The PE containers were introduced into a stove at 96 °C for three hours. Finally, the solution was filtered, and the retained powders were dried and weighed. Weight losses (%) were estimated with the Equation (1). Additionally, As, Pb, and Zn in the solution were analyzed by ICP-OES spectrophotometer.
%   l o s s e s = i n i t i a l   w e i g h t f i n a l   w e i g h t i n i t i a l   w e i g h t × 100
Density was measured using a 25 mL calibrated glass pycnometer, 5 g of powdered glass and toluene as the immersion liquid. It was calculated using Equation (2) [24].
δ = ( m 1 m ) ( d 1 d a ) ( m 3 + m 1 m m 2 ) + d a
where δ = density; da = air density; d1 = immersion liquid density (toluene = 0.8623 g/cm3 at 25), m = pycnometer mass; m1 = pycnometer mass plus glass mass; m2 = pycnometer plus glass plus liquid mass; and m3 = pycnometer plus liquid mass. The chemical resistance and density tests, crucial for understanding the durability and physical properties of the glasses, were carried out in triplicate to ensure the reliability of the results. The values were averaged to provide a comprehensive overview. The produced glass properties were then compared with SLS waste, providing a solid basis for the conclusions drawn from this research.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Glass Characterization

From the content of the raw materials, the theoretical composition of each glass produced can be calculated, which is presented in Table 4. Compositions MTG1–MTG5, which were melted at 1350 °C, formed glass that could be cast onto a steel plate. However, the composition MTG6, due to its high viscosity, was vitrified and attached to the crucible, making it impossible to overturn. This was due to the increase in silica and alumina as well as the decrease in flux oxides. The synthesized glasses presented a slight green color, turning to a yellow-green color with an increase in tailing quantity in the composition. The literature describes that clear SLS glasses have a low iron content (less than 0.5 weight % [25]); at low concentrations of Fe2O3 (less quantity of tailings), there are Fe2+ ions, since it is known that Fe2+ absorbs the red light region resulting in the glass appearing blue-green [26,27]. In contrast, at higher concentrations of Fe2O3, Fe3+ ions could be present in glasses, causing that coloration to turn yellow, according to what has been established in many pieces of research [27,28,29]. In addition, Figure 3 presents the XRD patterns of synthesized glass samples. It can be seen that a broad diffuse scattering at different angles and an absence of crystallization peaks indicate the complete transformation of crystalline mining tailings (which contain SiO2 as the main crystalline phase) into an amorphous structure.
The FTIR analysis provides crucial insights into the structural arrangement of the glass network, making it a significant part of our research. The FTIR transmittance spectra of both glasses and GR are presented in Figure 4. Five main bands are observed at 430, 695, 790, 1010, and 1425 cm−1, revealing a lack of a sharp form that indicates a general disorder in the silicate network [30]. The band at 430 cm−1 corresponds to the bending vibrations of Si-O-Si and Si-O-Al [7,9]. At 695 cm−1, a band appears, which can be attributed to B-O-B bond-bending vibrations from the pentaborate group or the bending vibrations of BO3 triangles. Similarly, the band at 790 cm−1 is attributed to the tetrahedral structure’s symmetric stretching and bending vibrations, including X-O-X bonds (where X = Si, Fe, Al, B) [7,9,31,32]. The broad and intense band at 1010 cm−1 is assigned to the asymmetric stretching vibrations of Si-O-Si and the symmetric stretching vibration of the O-B-O bonds for tetrahedral units [7,9,32]. The band at 1425 cm−1 is due to the B-O bond stretching vibrations and the B-O bridging between the (B3O6)3− boroxol rings to the modes of the boron–oxygen triangular units [BO3], which are the chains or rings of metaborate, pyroborate and orthoborate groups [33,34]; this band only appears in synthesized glasses, which have in their composition B2O3 as flux, and is not present in the reference glass. It is observed that the bands at 430, 790, and 1010 cm−1 become more intense with the increase in tailings in the glass. This increase in intensity is a significant finding and is explained by the increasing amounts of silicate and aluminate groups, which, according to Almasri et al.’s explanations [32], leads to more intense bands. Similarly, due to the increasing aluminate groups and considering that Al3+ acts as a network former, non-bridge oxygens decrease, as proposed by Fernandes et al. [35], leading to a better-polymerized glass structure.
SEM analyses confirmed the presence of a single glassy phase in each synthesized glass. Figure 5 displays the MTG1 and MTG5 glass samples; the top image of the micrograph is a photograph of the glass after pouring. Based on the average results from EDS on at least five points of each sample (because boron content could not be quantified), the semi-quantitative analyses revealed an increase of Si and Al from MTG1 to MTG5. This observation aligns with the FTIR results, which showed more intense bands due to increased silicate and aluminate groups. Additionally, Figure 6 presents an elemental mapping of the MTG3 glass, a significant finding indicating a uniform distribution of the main elements in glasses. This suggests that the different groups of B2O3 (chains and rings detected by FTIR) could be incorporated into the silicate phase, mainly comprised of tetrahedral units of SiO2, forming a single glassy phase. These results provide clear evidence of the uniform distribution of elements in the glass, a key characteristic of a well-polymerized glass structure.
The synthesized glasses’ thermal behavior was compared to GR, and the DTA results are shown in Figure 7. The glass transition (Tg) ranged from 625 to 831 °C. It was expected that the Tg of all the glasses would have a similar behavior to the MTG1 glass (Tg = 625 °C), with a slight increase due to the increase in silica and alumina in the composition; however, for the MTG2–MTG5 glasses, an apparent Tg is shown. With an increase in mining tailings, Tg also increased, exceeding the Tg of the GR (Tg = 808 °C). Glasses MTG1, MTG2, and MTG3 exhibited exothermic peaks at 820, 890, and 958 °C, respectively, which can be considered as the crystallization temperatures (Tc). On the other hand, compositions MTG4 and MTG5 showed a behavior similar to SLS glass (GR), where an apparent Tg was observed but not a Tc peak. According to Terry Lay et al. [14], glass stability is often characterized by the difference between the beginning of the glass transition region and the appearance of the first crystallization peak. Also, the absence of exothermic peaks can indicate a lack of crystallization. Hence, compositions MTG4 and MTG5 (with 17 and 21.3% of mining tailings, respectively), with the highest Al2O3 content, might be considered as stable as GR glass, instilling confidence in the research findings.

3.2. Properties Evaluation

The chemical resistance and the density of the synthesized glasses were measured and compared against the GR glass, and the results are presented in Table 5; according to the standard, samples with values higher than 5% should not be used in humid atmospheres; therefore, compositions MTG4 and MTG5 presented better behavior. In this sense, in the basic medium, the samples presented negative values, which means that the samples gained weight during the test. The values varied from −0.62 to −9.07%. The MTG4 (−0.62%) and MTG5 (−0.79%) samples presented the best behavior, even better than that of the GR (−3.41%). Considering that the test was carried out with an aqueous solution of NaOH, the weight gain could be due to the incorporation of free water molecules into the leached layers of the glass surface, according to work established by Paul A. [36]; also, several researchers have explained the mechanism as the dissolution of the SLS glass network due to a hydrolysis reaction, as is shown in Equation (3) [13,37,38]:
Si-O-Si- + OH- ↔ -Si-OH + -Si-O-
These results indicate that the synthesized glasses, particularly MTG4 and MTG5, could be suitable for applications requiring high chemical resistance, such as in the pharmaceutical or chemical industries.
The glass’s resistance varied from 0.16 to 1.15% weight loss in an acidic environment. It was observed that as the mining tailings content increased, there was better chemical resistance. Glasses MTG4 and MTG5 showed the best results, with tailings content of 17% and 21.3%, respectively, similar to the reference glass. The reaction mechanism is the same as proposed by several researchers, who established that acid attack involves an ionic diffusion process due to the proton domain. The attack is related to the exchange of alkaline/alkali-earth ions (such as Na+/K+ and Ca2+/Mg2+ in the glass) with H+ and H3O+ ions from the acid and water, as shown in Equations (4) and (5) [13,37,38].
Si-O-M+ + H+ ↔ -Si-OH + M+
Si-O-M+ + H3O+ ↔ -Si-OH + H2O + M+
However, these chemical resistance results should be taken with caution, since the dispersion of the reported values is high (high standard deviation).
On the other hand, it is well known that the introduction of alkaline fluxes, such as K2O into the batch, brings a detriment of glass properties, including chemical resistance, as the introduction of B2O3 and Al2O3 (from flux and tailings, respectively) can increase corrosion resistance [21]; therefore, the mixtures used in the present investigation had good chemical resistance, despite the high percentage of alkaline flux in each composition. Likewise, it can be seen from these results that the chemical attack in the basic medium was more aggressive than acid medium for all glasses. The above-mentioned agrees with the literature data, which establishes that oxide glasses generally have good resistance to attack by acid solutions and low resistance to alkaline attack [36,39,40].
After the chemical attack of the MTG4 and MTG5, the filtered solution was analyzed, and the As, Pb, and Zn content was presented in Table 6. The As values are better than those reported by Liu et al. of 0.88 mg/L, after soaking glasses in water at 35 °C for 28 days [13].
Finally, the experimental density values (Table 5) ranged from 2.35 to 2.12 g/cm3, while calculated densities according to Fluegel [41] ranged from 2.56 to 2.50. Although the values clearly differ, as observed, there is a decrease in density with the increase in mine tailings, which can be attributed to a greater degree of structural compaction of the glassy matrix, due mainly to the increase in silica content and decrease in alkaline oxides, see Table 3. MTG4 and MTG5 presented similar values to SLS reference glass (GR). Chemical resistance and density results confirm that a well-polymerized glass structure was obtained.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the feasibility of obtaining new light green glasses from mining tailings (incorporating up to 25.6 weight %) and waste glass was demonstrated. The results indicated that glasses MTG4 and MTG5 had excellent thermal stability with a Tg of 818 and 831 °C, respectively. Also, the glasses boosted good chemical behavior due to the better-polymerized glass structure, attributed to the increase in SiO2 and Al2O3 and the decrease in alkaline oxides. It could be proved that glasses retain potentially toxic elements (As, Pb, and Zn) in their structures. Therefore, tailing vitrification is a viable process for reducing both environmental pollution and waste volume in the northern region of Mexico, minimizing the health risks of the population. Finally, we can establish that for each ton of glass produced, up to 213 kg of mining tailings and 639 kg of cullet could be recovered, although, for industrial considerations, dilatometric and viscosity analyses are required. Future work will be focused on the potential of producing glass-ceramics using a parent heat treatment and their characterization toward applying them as glazes on ceramic bodies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.G.-L.; P.P.-P.; and Z.V.Q.-J.; methodology, M.A.G.-L.; D.M.N.-R.; M.P.; and L.M.-T.; formal analysis, M.Á.E.-B.; and A.R.-P.; investigation, M.A.G.-L.; L.A.B.-A.; analysis and revision R.B.-G. and R.H.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.G.-L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by COCYTED (Consejo de Ciencia y Tecnología del Estado de Durango), project number STEM-2021-732. The payment of the article processing charge was funded by COCYTED.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge Rubén Rodríguez and Diana Bretado for their laboratory technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Armendáriz-Villegas, E.J.; Covarrubias-García, M.A.; Troyo-Diéguez, E.; Lagunes, E.; Arreola-Lizárraga, A.; Nieto-Garibay, A.; Beltrán-Morales, L.F.; Ortega-Rubio, A. Metal mining and natural protected areas in Mexico: Geographic overlaps and environmental implications. Environ. Sci. Policy 2015, 48, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alfonso, P.; Tomasa, O.; Garcia-Valles, M.; Tarragó, M.; Martínez, S. Glass-ceramic crystallization from tailings of the Morille tungsten deposit, Spain. Mater. Lett. 2022, 312, 131694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. De Lima Camelo, D.; Da Silva Filho, L.A.; De Arruda, D.L.; Cyrino, L.M.; Fonseca Barroso, G.; Metri Correa, M.; Sanches Barbeira, P.J.; Brandao Mendes, D.; Duarte Pasa, V.M.; Profet, D. Mineralogical fingerprint and human health risk from potentially toxic elements of Fe mining tailings from the Fundao dam. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 912, 169328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sosa-Rodríguez, F.S.; Vazquez-Arenas, J.; Ponce-Pena, P.; Aragon-Piña, A.; Mallet, M.; Trejo-Cordova, G.; Núnez-Ramirez, D.M.; Escobedo-Bretado, M.A.; Lara, R.H. Sphalerite oxidation simulating acidic, circumneutral and alkaline conditions to account for weathering behavior and Zn release. J. Geochem. Explor. 2023, 247, 107163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sosa-Rodríguez, F.S.; Vazquez-Arenas, J.; Ponce-Pena, P.; Escobedo-Bretado, M.A.; Castellanos-Juárez, F.X.; Labastida, I.; Lara, R.H. Spatial distribution, mobility and potential health risks of arsenic and lead concentrations in semiarid fine top-soils of Durango City, Mexico. Catena 2020, 190, 104540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nava-Reyna, E.; Medrano-Macías, J. Arsenic occurrence in the environment: Current situation of the Comarca Lagunera in northern Mexico and bioremediation approaches. J. Agric. Food Res. 2022, 10, 100379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shi, J.; He, F.; Ye, C.; Hu, L.; Xie, J.; Yang, H.; Liu, X. Preparation and characterization of CaO-Al2O3-SiO2 glass-ceramics from molybdenum tailings. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2017, 197, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Garcia-Troncoso, N.; Baykara, H.; Cornejo, M.H.; Riofrio, A.; Tinoco-Hidalgo, M.; Flores-Rada, J. Comparative mechanical properties of conventional concrete mixture and concrete incorporating mining tailings sands. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 16, e01031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. El-Sayed Seleman, M.M.; El-Kheshen, A.A.; Raslan, M.F.; Shoeir, R.H. Glass production using tailing of upgraded rare metal mineralization, Abu Rusheid area—Egypt for nuclear waste immobilization. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cetin, S.; Marangoni, M.; Bernardo, E. Lightweight glass–ceramic tiles from the sintering of mining tailings. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 5294–5300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Karhu, M.; Lagerbom, J.; Honkanen, M.; Huttunen-Saarivirta, E.; Kiilakoski, J.; Vuoristo, P.; Solismaa, S.; Kivikytö-Reponen, P. Mining tailings as a raw material for glass-bonded thermally sprayed ceramic coatings: Microstructure and properties. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 40, 4111–4114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Abdelhadi, K.; Latifa, O.; BKhadija, B.; Lahcen, B. Valorization of mining waste and tailings through paste backfilling solution, Imiter operation, Morocco. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2016, 26, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, J.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, H.; Luo, L.; Ding, L.; Shi, W.; Jiang, W.; Wang, H. Recycling of arsenic residue and waste soda-lime silicate glass via vitrification. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2023, 609, 122300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Terry Lay, G.F.; Rockwell, M.C.; Wiltshire, J.C.; Ketata, C. Characteristics of silicate glasses derived from vitrification of manganese crust tailings. Ceram. Int. 2009, 35, 1961–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alfonso, P.; Tomasa, O.; Garcia-Valles, M.; Tarragó, M.; Martínez, S.; Esteves, H. Potential of tungsten tailings as glass raw materials. Mater. Lett. 2018, 228, 456–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alfonso, P.; Castro, D.; Garcia-Valles, M.; Tarragó, M.; Tomasa, O.; Martínez, S. Recycling of tailings from the Barruecopardo tungsten deposit for the production of glass. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2016, 125, 681–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khan, S.; Allu, A.R.; Gaddam, A.; Fernandes, H.R.; Dutta, S.; Kongar, P.S.; Tarafder, A.; Ferreira, J.M.F.; Annapurna, K. Use of colemanite and borax penta-hydrate in soda lime silicate glass melting—A strategy to reduce energy consumption and improve glass properties. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 1181–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Baccarin, L.I.P.; Bragança, S.R. Thermodynamic simulations for optimizing the firing of traditional ceramic formulations using waste glass as a flux. Mater. Today Commun. 2024, 38, 107913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Divina, R.; Sathiyapriya, G.; Marimuthu, K.; Askin, A.; Sayyed, M.I. Structural, elastic, optical and γ-ray shielding behavior of Dy3+ ions doped heavy metal incorporated borate glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2020, 545, 120269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nevolina, L.A.; Shtenberg, M.V.; Zherebtsov, D.A.; Koroleva, O.N. Structure and crystallizability of K2O-B2O3-SiO2 and K2O-B2O3-GeO2 glasses: Effect of composition and heat treatment mode. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 37228–37237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fernández Navarro, J.M. El Vidrio, Constitución, Fabricación, Propiedades, 3rd ed.; CSIC: Madrid, Spain, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pernice, P.; Esposito, S.; Aronne, A.; Sigaev, V.N. Structure and crystallization behavior of glasses in the BaO–B2O3–Al2O3 system. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1999, 258, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. GOST 10134-82; Standard [Russian National Standard]. Standards of the USSR: Moscow, Russia, 1982.
  24. Heiskanen, J. Comparison of three methods for determining the particle density of soil with liquid pycnometers. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1992, 23, 841–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Doyle, P.J. Glass-Making Today an Introduction to Current Practice in Glass Manufacture, 1st ed.; Portcullis Press Ltd.: Sheffield, UK, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  26. Russell, J.H. Soda-Lime-Silica Glasses. In Encyclopedia of Materials Technical Ceramics and Glasses, 1st ed.; Pomeroy, M., Cambier, F., Galassi, C., Hampshire, S., Leriche, A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; Volume 2, pp. 483–495. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hansen, E.; Perret, D.; Bardez-Giboire, I.; Diliberto, S.; Rapin, C. Iron enriched peraluminous glasses: Incorporation limit and effect of iron on glass transition temperature and viscosity. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2022, 584, 121523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gradmann, R.; Berthold, C.; Schüssler, I. Composition and colouring agents of historical Islamic glazes measured with EMPA and μ-XRD2. Eur. J. Miner. 2015, 27, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bidegaray, A.I.; Nys, K.; Silvestri, A.; Cosyns, P.; Meulebroeck, W.; Terryn, H.; Godet, S.; Ceglia, A. 50 shades of colour: How thickness, iron redox and manganese/antimony contents influence perceived and intrinsic colour in Roman glass. Archeol. Anthr. Sci. 2020, 12, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Reddy, A.A.; Goel, A.; Tulyaganov, D.U.; Kapoor, S.; Pradeesh, K.; Pascual, M.J.; Ferreira, J.M.F. Study of calcium magnesium aluminum silicate (CMAS) glass and glass-ceramic sealant for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Sourc. 2013, 231, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, F.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Liao, Q.; Zhu, H.; Zhou, J.; Qu, X.; Gong, Z.; Fu, X.; Zhu, Y. Effect of cerium oxide on phase composition, structure, thermal stability and aqueous durability of sodium-iron-boron-phosphate based glasses. J. Nucl. Mater. 2021, 556, 153199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Almasri, K.A.; Aziz Sidek, H.A.; Matori, K.A.; Mohd Hafiz, M.Z. Effect of sintering temperature on physical, structural and optical properties of wollastonite based glass-ceramic derived from waste soda lime silica glasses. Results Phys. 2017, 7, 2242–2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Madheshiya, A.; Dey, K.K.; Ghosh, M.; Singh, J.; Gautam, C. Synthesis, structural, optical and solid state NMR study of lead bismuth titanate borosilicate glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2019, 503–504, 288–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ponce-Peña, P.; González-Lozano, M.A.; Escobedo-Bretado, M.A.; Núñez-Ramírez, D.M.; Rodríguez-Pulido, A.; Quiñones Jurado, Z.V.; Poisot, M.; Sulbarán-Rangel, B. Crystallization of Glasses Containing K2O, PbO, BaO, Al2O3, B2O3, and TiO2. Crystals 2022, 12, 574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fernandes, H.R.; Tulyaganov, D.U.; Goel, A.; Ribeiro, M.J.; Pascual, M.J.; Ferreira, J.M.F. Effect of Al2O3 and K2O content on structure, properties and devitrification of glasses in the Li2O–SiO2 system. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 30, 2017–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Paul, A. Chemistry of Glasses, 2nd ed.; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  37. Melcher, M.; Schreiner, M. Statistical evaluation of potash-lime-silica glass weathering. Anal Bioanal. Chem. 2004, 379, 628–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tournié, A.; Ricciardi, P.; Colomban, P. Glass corrosion mechanisms: A multiscale analysis. Solid State Ionics 2008, 179, 2142–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Barbieri, L.; Karamanov, A.; Corradi, A.; Lancellotti, I.; Pelino, M.; Rincon, J.M. Structure, chemical durability and crystallization behavior of incinerator-based glassy systems. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2008, 354, 521–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fernández Navarro, J.M.; Mari, E.A. Influencia de la adición de ZrO2 y TiO2 sobre el comportamiento químico de vidrios de silicato y borosilicato sódico-cálcico. Bol. Soc. Esp. Ceram. Vidr. 1990, 29, 235–244. [Google Scholar]
  41. Fluegel, A. Global model for calculating room-temperature glass density from the composition. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2007, 90, 2622–2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Particle size distribution of the raw materials.
Figure 1. Particle size distribution of the raw materials.
Recycling 10 00039 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of mining tailings (MT) and SLS glass (GR).
Figure 2. XRD patterns of mining tailings (MT) and SLS glass (GR).
Recycling 10 00039 g002
Figure 3. XRD patterns of MTG1–MTG5 and GR.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of MTG1–MTG5 and GR.
Recycling 10 00039 g003
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of the synthesized and reference glasses.
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of the synthesized and reference glasses.
Recycling 10 00039 g004
Figure 5. SEM images and semi-quantitative EDS analyses of MTG1 and MTG5 glass samples. The “+” symbol indicates the point where the point analysis was performed.
Figure 5. SEM images and semi-quantitative EDS analyses of MTG1 and MTG5 glass samples. The “+” symbol indicates the point where the point analysis was performed.
Recycling 10 00039 g005
Figure 6. EDS mapping of the sample MTG3 at 2000×.
Figure 6. EDS mapping of the sample MTG3 at 2000×.
Recycling 10 00039 g006
Figure 7. DTA results of the investigated glasses (MTG1–MTG5) and SLS reference glass (GR).
Figure 7. DTA results of the investigated glasses (MTG1–MTG5) and SLS reference glass (GR).
Recycling 10 00039 g007
Table 1. Chemical compositions of raw materials: mining tailings (MT) and reference glass (GR).
Table 1. Chemical compositions of raw materials: mining tailings (MT) and reference glass (GR).
Raw MaterialsOxide Content (Weight %)
SiO2Al2O3CaOMgONa2OK2OFe2O3TiO2MnOP2O5ZnO
MT90.134.060.0750.070.1762.231.640.080.0120.0520.021
GR71.651.2111.990.9412.990.940.23----
Table 2. Investigated composition to produce glasses.
Table 2. Investigated composition to produce glasses.
SampleComposition (Weight %)
Mining TailingsGlass WasteK2OB2O3
MTG14.281.07.07.8
MTG28.576.77.07.8
MTG312.872.47.07.8
MTG417.068.27.07.8
MTG521.363.97.07.8
MTG625.659.77.07.8
GR0.0100.00.00.0
Table 3. Concentration of potentially toxic elements in mining tailings.
Table 3. Concentration of potentially toxic elements in mining tailings.
ElementConcentration (mg/L)
Iron 1631.00
Arsenic4.14
Zinc0.29
Lead0.24
Cadmium 0.19
Manganese 0.15
Table 4. Calculated glass compositions from content of raw materials.
Table 4. Calculated glass compositions from content of raw materials.
SampleComposition (Weight %)
SiO2Al2O3CaOMgONa2OK2OB2O3Fe2O3
MTG161.821.159.720.7610.537.917.800.26
MTG262.171.279.200.739.987.867.800.32
MTG363.411.408.690.699.437.977.800.38
MTG464.191.528.190.658.898.027.800.44
MTG564.981.647.680.628.348.087.800.50
MTG665.851.767.180.587.808.137.800.56
Table 5. Chemical resistance and density results of studied glasses.
Table 5. Chemical resistance and density results of studied glasses.
Sample Basic MediumAcid MediumDensity
Average
(% Losses)
Standard Deviation (σ)Average
(% Losses)
Standard Deviation (σ)Average (g/cm3)Standard Deviation (σ)Calculated from
Table 4
MTG1−9.073.211.52.552.350.0212.56
MTG2−6.117.140.860.592.270.0032.55
MTG3−8.278.110.650.992.210.0272.54
MTG4−0.623.160.230.522.180.0862.52
MTG5−0.793.970.180.152.120.1222.51
GR−3.413.960.180.12.110.0752.50
Table 6. Concentration of As, Pb and Zn in the lixiviated solution after chemical attack of MTG4 and MTG5 glasses.
Table 6. Concentration of As, Pb and Zn in the lixiviated solution after chemical attack of MTG4 and MTG5 glasses.
AnalyteConcentration (mg/L)
MTG4 (HCl)MTG5 (HCl)MTG5 (NaOH)
As0.660.513.81
Pb0.160.31Not detected
Zn0.190.181.03
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Escobedo-Bretado, M.Á.; Ponce-Peña, P.; Poisot, M.; Rodríguez-Pulido, A.; Núñez-Ramírez, D.M.; Bretado-Aragón, L.A.; Lara, R.H.; Medina-Torres, L.; Quiñones-Jurado, Z.V.; Briones-Gallardo, R.; et al. Characterization and Property Evaluation of Glasses Made from Mine Tailings, Glass Waste, and Fluxes. Recycling 2025, 10, 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10020039

AMA Style

Escobedo-Bretado MÁ, Ponce-Peña P, Poisot M, Rodríguez-Pulido A, Núñez-Ramírez DM, Bretado-Aragón LA, Lara RH, Medina-Torres L, Quiñones-Jurado ZV, Briones-Gallardo R, et al. Characterization and Property Evaluation of Glasses Made from Mine Tailings, Glass Waste, and Fluxes. Recycling. 2025; 10(2):39. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10020039

Chicago/Turabian Style

Escobedo-Bretado, Miguel Ángel, Patricia Ponce-Peña, Martha Poisot, Alicia Rodríguez-Pulido, Diola Marina Núñez-Ramírez, Luis Alberto Bretado-Aragón, René H. Lara, Luis Medina-Torres, Zoe V. Quiñones-Jurado, Roberto Briones-Gallardo, and et al. 2025. "Characterization and Property Evaluation of Glasses Made from Mine Tailings, Glass Waste, and Fluxes" Recycling 10, no. 2: 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10020039

APA Style

Escobedo-Bretado, M. Á., Ponce-Peña, P., Poisot, M., Rodríguez-Pulido, A., Núñez-Ramírez, D. M., Bretado-Aragón, L. A., Lara, R. H., Medina-Torres, L., Quiñones-Jurado, Z. V., Briones-Gallardo, R., & González-Lozano, M. A. (2025). Characterization and Property Evaluation of Glasses Made from Mine Tailings, Glass Waste, and Fluxes. Recycling, 10(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10020039

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop