Next Article in Journal
Robust Parameter Identification Strategy for Lead Acid Battery Model
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of the Oxygen Surface Functionalities Introduced by Electrochemical Treatment on the Behavior of Graphite Felts as Electrodes in VRFBs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of Capacity Fade for the Constant Current and WLTC Drive Cycle Discharge Modes for Commercial LiFeYPO4 Cells Used in xEV Vehicles

1
Department of Transport Telematics, Faculty of Transportation Sciences, Czech Technical University in Prague, Konviktská 20, 110 00 Prague, Czech Republic
2
Gamma Technologies, Inc., 601 Oakmont Lane, Westmont, IL 60559, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Batteries 2022, 8(12), 282; https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries8120282
Submission received: 27 October 2022 / Revised: 28 November 2022 / Accepted: 6 December 2022 / Published: 12 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Storage System Aging, Diagnosis and Safety)

Abstract

In this paper, capacity fade of LiFeYPO4/graphite commercial cells during 116 cycles under different temperatures is studied. The cells were discharged in two modes, during Drive Cycle (DrC) discharge cycles the cell was discharged with current waveform calculated for example battery electric vehicle (BEV) under WLTC 3b drive cycle conditions, whereas during Constant Current (CC) discharge cycles the cell was discharged with a constant current of the same root mean square of the current, as the WLTC 3b current waveform and with the same depth of discharge. All the cells were charged in constant current/constant voltage mode. Two fresh cells were used for each discharge mode at 25 °C and as the results were similar, only one cell per discharge mode was used at the other temperatures 5 °C and 45 °C. Furthermore, simulation P2D model of calendar and cycle life was calibrated based on experimental data. SoC floating was observed during cycling for both discharge modes, accompanied with slight increase in end discharge voltage and growth of energy efficiency. Concluding the results for 25 °C, not waveform character, but the amount of electric charge in combination with calendar aging has the most effect on the cycle life, which is also proved by the simulation. For 5 °C, the capacity fade is milder for DrC discharge cycles, but simulation results do not prove that, which would demand further investigation. The results for 45 °C are apparently dependent on a higher amount of discharged and charged electric charge and influenced by calendar life, simulated capacity fade corresponds quite well to the experiment. The best State of Health (SoH) simulation results are for temperature 45 °C, RMSE is 0.10% SoH, for the other temperatures RMSE is 0.20 and 0.93% SoH for 25 and 5 °C, respectively.
Keywords: lithium-ion battery; LiFeYPO4; WLTP; electric vehicle; capacity fade; P2D model lithium-ion battery; LiFeYPO4; WLTP; electric vehicle; capacity fade; P2D model

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sadil, J.; Kekula, F.; Majera, J.; Pisharodi, V. Comparison of Capacity Fade for the Constant Current and WLTC Drive Cycle Discharge Modes for Commercial LiFeYPO4 Cells Used in xEV Vehicles. Batteries 2022, 8, 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries8120282

AMA Style

Sadil J, Kekula F, Majera J, Pisharodi V. Comparison of Capacity Fade for the Constant Current and WLTC Drive Cycle Discharge Modes for Commercial LiFeYPO4 Cells Used in xEV Vehicles. Batteries. 2022; 8(12):282. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries8120282

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sadil, Jindřich, František Kekula, Juraj Majera, and Vivek Pisharodi. 2022. "Comparison of Capacity Fade for the Constant Current and WLTC Drive Cycle Discharge Modes for Commercial LiFeYPO4 Cells Used in xEV Vehicles" Batteries 8, no. 12: 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries8120282

APA Style

Sadil, J., Kekula, F., Majera, J., & Pisharodi, V. (2022). Comparison of Capacity Fade for the Constant Current and WLTC Drive Cycle Discharge Modes for Commercial LiFeYPO4 Cells Used in xEV Vehicles. Batteries, 8(12), 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries8120282

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop