Next Article in Journal
Equivalent Minimum Hydrogen Consumption of Fuzzy Control-Based Fuel Cells: Exploration of Energy Management Strategies for Ships
Previous Article in Journal
Critical Review on High-Safety Lithium-Ion Batteries Modified by Self-Terminated Oligomers with Hyperbranched Architectures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Modelling Binder Degradation in the Thermal Treatment of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries by Coupling Discrete Element Method and Isoconversional Kinetics

by
Christian Nobis
,
Marco Mancini
and
Michael Fischlschweiger
*
Institute of Energy Process Engineering and Fuel Technology, Clausthal University of Technology, Agricolastraße 4, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Batteries 2024, 10(2), 63; https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10020063
Submission received: 28 December 2023 / Revised: 29 January 2024 / Accepted: 13 February 2024 / Published: 18 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Battery Processing, Manufacturing and Recycling)

Abstract

Developing efficient recycling processes with high recycling quotas for the recovery of graphite and other critical raw materials contained in LIBs is essential and prudent. This action holds the potential to substantially diminish the supply risk of raw materials for LIBs and enhance the sustainability of their production. An essential processing step in LIB recycling involves the thermal treatment of black mass to degrade the binder. This step is crucial as it enhances the recycling efficiency in subsequent processes, such as flotation and leaching-based processing. Therefore, this paper introduces a Representative Black Mass Model (RBMM) and develops a computational framework for the simulation of the thermal degradation of polymer-based binders in black mass (BM). The models utilize the discrete element method (DEM) with a coarse-graining (CG) scheme and the isoconversional method to predict binder degradation and the required heat. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the binder polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) is utilized to determine the model parameters. The model simulates a specific thermal treatment case on a laboratory scale and investigates the relationship between the scale factor and heating rate. The findings reveal that, for a particular BM system, a scaling factor of 100 regarding the particle diameter is applicable within a heating rate range of 2 to 22 K/min.
Keywords: spent lithium-ion battery; LIB recycling; binder degradation; isoconversional method; discrete element method (DEM); thermal treatment spent lithium-ion battery; LIB recycling; binder degradation; isoconversional method; discrete element method (DEM); thermal treatment

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nobis, C.; Mancini, M.; Fischlschweiger, M. Modelling Binder Degradation in the Thermal Treatment of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries by Coupling Discrete Element Method and Isoconversional Kinetics. Batteries 2024, 10, 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10020063

AMA Style

Nobis C, Mancini M, Fischlschweiger M. Modelling Binder Degradation in the Thermal Treatment of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries by Coupling Discrete Element Method and Isoconversional Kinetics. Batteries. 2024; 10(2):63. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10020063

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nobis, Christian, Marco Mancini, and Michael Fischlschweiger. 2024. "Modelling Binder Degradation in the Thermal Treatment of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries by Coupling Discrete Element Method and Isoconversional Kinetics" Batteries 10, no. 2: 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10020063

APA Style

Nobis, C., Mancini, M., & Fischlschweiger, M. (2024). Modelling Binder Degradation in the Thermal Treatment of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries by Coupling Discrete Element Method and Isoconversional Kinetics. Batteries, 10(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10020063

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop