Next Article in Journal
Trewia nudiflora Linn, a Medicinal Plant: Allelopathic Potential and Characterization of Bioactive Compounds from Its Leaf Extracts
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainability Perspectives of Organic Farming and Plant Factory Systems—From Divergences towards Synergies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Horticulturae
Volume 9
Issue 8
10.3390/horticulturae9080896
horticulturae-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Biotechnological “Provence” of the Future Provided by Antisense Oligoilators and Olinscides for Horticulturae

by
Volodymyr V. Oberemok
1,2,
Yelizaveta V. Puzanova
1,* and
Ilya A. Novikov
1
1
Department of Molecular Genetics and Biotechnologies, V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Simferopol 295007, Crimea
2
Laboratory of Entomology and Phytopathology, Nikita Botanical Garden, National Scientific Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Yalta 298648, Crimea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2023, 9(8), 896; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9080896
Submission received: 19 June 2023 / Revised: 13 July 2023 / Accepted: 2 August 2023 / Published: 7 August 2023
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Successful management of the synthesis of secondary metabolites of essential oil plants is the basis for the economic growth of the essential oil industry. Against the backdrop of a growing global population and a decrease in land available for cultivation, simple and effective ways to increase the content of certain components in essential oils are becoming increasingly important. Selection is no longer keeping pace with market needs, which stimulates the search for faster methods to control the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. In this article, using the genera Lavandula and Mentha as examples, we consider the prospects for use of antisense oligonucleotides (ASO), oligoilators, to rapidly increase the concentration of valuable components in essential oil and its yield. This article discusses the use of unmodified ASOs as regulators of a plant’s secondary metabolism to increase the synthesis of individual valuable components, presenting a completely new way to increase the yield of valuable substances based on unique nucleotide sequences. The proposed approach is effective, affordable, safe, and significantly reduces the time needed to obtain plants that synthesize the required concentrations of target substances. Oligoilators can be used with oligonucleotide insecticides (olinscides) in complex formulations used for green agriculture. Further investigation is needed to determine maximum economic efficiency for this approach.

1. Introduction

Secondary metabolites produced by essential oil plants, or aromatic plants, are widely used in various fields of human activity. The world symbol of lavender cultivation has become one of the regions in Provence, France. This association runs like a “red thread” through our review, symbolizing the prospect of a completely new biotechnological “Provence” in the future. Today, a large amount of research is aimed at improving the existing methods of cultivation of essential oil plants to increase their overall productivity and manage their metabolic pathways to obtain higher content of certain valuable secondary metabolites. Most of the existing approaches—selection [1], methods of genetic modification [2], and genome editing [3]—require a significant investment of time and energy. Nevertheless, people will continue to use essential oils for their healing properties and pleasant aromas, which drives the search for intensified agriculture designed to meet human needs. The reduction in sown areas coupled with increased population pits agriculture against two competing forces and exacerbates the problem of intensifying agriculture designed to meet human needs [4,5].

2. Kingdom of Scents in Kingdom of Plants

Essential oil plants are valued primarily for their secondary metabolites. Generally, the synthesis of secondary metabolites is based on a few precursors: 5–6 amino acids for alkaloids, phenylalanine, or tyrosine for phenolic compounds, and mevalonic acid or 5-hydroxyxylulose for isoprenoids. The precursors of essential oils in plant cells are linear prenyl pyrophosphates, which are synthesized into more than 55,000 terpenes (isoprenoids) that have been found in various plants (Figure 1) [6].
In plants, terpenes are derived from two universal five-carbon precursors, isopentenyl pyrophosphate and C5-dimethylallylpyrophosphate [7]. Starting with C5-dimethylallylpyrophosphate, head-to-tail condensation reactions with one to three molecules of C5-isopentenyl pyrophosphate to generate C10-geranylpyrophosphate, C15-farnesylpyrophosphate, and C20-geranylgeranylpyrophosphate. These products are generated by reactions involving the corresponding enzymes: C10-geranylpyrophosphate synthase, C15-farnesylpyrophosphate synthase, and C20-geranylgeranylpyrophosphate synthase. These synthases are the key intermediates for the biosynthesis of diverse terpenes [8,9].
Prenyltransferases can be further classified into cis- and trans-types based on the type of double bond formed during C5-isopentenyl pyrophosphate condensation [10].
To date, about 300 industrially significant essential oils are widely used. The most popular of these are mint, lavender, citrus, and coniferous oils. In addition, some terpenes are commercially significant for use in drugs, such as taxol (anti-cancer) [11] and artemisin (antimalarial) [12], as flavors, including menthol and linalool [13], and as nutraceuticals, particularly carotenoids [14].
Essential oils have well-established antibacterial, antibiotic, and antiviral properties, and are also believed to be beneficial for use in treating Alzheimer’s disease, cardiovascular disease, cancer, migraine [15], and pain during pregnancy [16,17]. The use of essential oils as antioxidants in the preservation of various foods is gaining in popularity [18]. Essential oils are particularly valuable for their varied traditional uses among different cultures worldwide who have used plants and their derivatives from time immemorial [19,20].
The global production of essential oils as of 2020 totaled 370,000,000 kg, valued at more than USD 10 billion. Despite their high value for use in perfumery and medicine, the largest consumer of essential oils is currently the food industry. The production of most non-alcoholic beverages and some alcoholic, confectionery, and semi-finished products is not complete without essential oils or other secondary plant metabolites. The largest producers of essential oils are Asian countries: China and India produce the most, followed by Indonesia, Sri Lanka, and Vietnam. Brazil and China are confirmed leaders in the production of orange oil; India and China, corn mint oil and eucalyptus oil; Argentina and Spain, lemon oil; France and Spain, lavender oil. According to the European Federation of Essential Oils, the global production of essential oils covers about 600,000 hectares of the 1.6 billion hectares under agricultural production. Some oils are produced in small quantities due to the way the plant is harvested; for example, patchouli, ylang-ylang, clove, and nutmeg are still harvested from forests or grown on small farms [21].
The rise in the standard of living and purchasing power of populations worldwide has contributed to the rapid increase in the production of essential oils. For example, over the past ten years, production in Europe has increased by 41%. In Germany, which produces 46% (19,000,000 kg) of European oils, production has increased by more than 50%. France, although producing fewer kilograms over the same period, increased its sales by 90% due to the cost of oil. By 2016, world exports had already reached USD 4.54 billion [22]. Analysis of the next decade projects a clear increase in this indicator, due not only to the natural tendency to increase the scale of production, but also due to an increased demand for natural antibacterial and antiviral agents in the prevention of respiratory diseases [23].

3. Biosynthesis of Essential Oils: Far, Far Away in Nucleotide Land

There are two pathways for the biosynthesis of isoprenoids, mevalonate, and methylerythritol phosphate, which occur in different parts of the plant (Figure 2). Both of these pathways ultimately yield geranyl diphosphate, which is the precursor to all isoprenoids.
Mevalonate (MVA) pathway. Acetoacetyl (AcAc) −CoA thiolase (AACT) catalyzes the conversion of two units of acetyl coenzyme A (Ac−CoA) from the cytosol’s mevalonic acid (MVA) route into isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP). 3−hydroxy−3−methylglutaryl−CoA synthase (HMGS), the enzyme that comes next, catalyzes the aldol condensation of Ac−CoA with AcAc−CoA to create HMG−CoA. HMG−CoA reductase (HMGR) is responsible for mevalonate synthesis. Mevalonate kinase (MK) and phosphomevalonate kinase (PMK) catalyze two phosphorylation reactions that change MVA into mevalonate−5−diphosphate (MVADP). Afterwards, ATP-dependent diphosphomevalonate decarboxylase catalyzes the conversion of MVADP into IPP. The last step in the production of dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP) is catalyzed by isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase (IDI) [24,25,26].
Methylerythritol (MEP) pathway. The IPP and DMAPP are formed by the seven enzymatic steps that make up MEP pathways. Condensation of pyruvate with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate to produce 1−deoxy−D−xylulose−5−phosphate (DXP) by DXP synthase is the initial step. DXP reductoisomerase, also known as MEP synthase, then converts DXP into MEP. MEP is then converted to 1−hydroxy−2−methyl−2−(E)−butenyl−4−diphosphate (HMBPP) by the action of 2−C−methyl−D−erythritol−4−phosphate cytidyltransferase (MCT), 4−diphosphocytidyl−2−C−methyl−D−erythritol kinase (CMK), 2−C−methyl−D−erythritol 2,4−cyclodiphosphate synthase, 1−hydroxy−2−methyl−2−(E)−butenyl 4−diphosphate synthase. The last step involves the branching of HMBPP into IPP and DMAPP, which is subsequently completed by a single enzyme called 1−hydroxy−2−methyl−2−(E)−butenyl 4−diphosphate reductase acting simultaneously. While IPP and DMAPP are both produced by the HDR in the MEP route, the plastid, in which IDI is localized, also participates in the substrate optimization stage by catalyzing the isomerization of IPP. The activity of the enzyme IDI allows for the inter-coverage of IPP and DMAPP. In the plant cell, the MEP route generates both IPP and DMAPP, but the IDI is necessary to make DMAPP in the cytosol, mitochondria, but not in plastids [27,28].
Like all cell components, essential oils are synthesized with the participation of enzymes encoded by genes. A large number of studies are aimed at identifying the genes involved in the synthesis of essential oils. Developments in the field of RNA-Seq have made it possible for detailed transcriptomic studies of species without a reference genome [29]. De novo transcriptome assembly has been widely used for this purpose. This has proved to be particularly useful in the study and identification of genes vital to the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites in aromatic plants, such as Artemisia annua, Mentha spicate, Cinnamomum camphora, Salvia miltiorrhiza, Lindera glauca, and Huperzia serrata [30]. Transcriptomes of different lavender species (Lavandula spp.) are currently being studied. The results of these studies are aimed at identifying patterns between genes, the chemical composition of the oil, and its aromatic properties [31]. Of particular interest is the observation that the genome L. angustifolia contains a high copy number (14 and 7, respectively) of 1-deoxyxylulose-5-phosphate synthase and 4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enyl diphosphate reductase genes, encoding the two known regulatory steps in the plastidial isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway. This fact confirms that the genome of most essential oil plants is strongly duplicated, which in turn allows the plant to produce a large amount of essential oil [32]. The accumulating information concerning genome sequences of essential oil plants encourages the use of this knowledge as a tool to obtain practical results and economic benefits.
One of the most promising and simplest ways to regulate gene expression is the use of antisense oligonucleotides (ASO), oligoilators, which has found wide application in both medicine and agriculture [33,34,35,36]. This simple alternative technology effectively replaces more complex and expensive methods such as RNA interference [37] or classical selection [38]. It should be noted that short unmodified ASO as oligonucleotide insecticides have already proven themselves as effective preparations for insect pest control [39,40]. In our research, we drew attention to the possible joint use of oligonucleotide insecticides with preparations that can affect the aromatic plant’s cell in order to trigger integrated increase in crop yields.
In theory, the use of ASO during gene expression can disrupt transcription, splicing, and translation (Figure 3). They employ four main mechanisms of action in eukaryotic cells. The first mechanism is associated with the formation of the ASO-mRNA complex, which can affect splicing. The second mechanism is steric blocking of protein synthesis. The third mechanism based on the action of RNAse H, which mediates the degradation of the mRNA-ASO complex. The fourth mechanism relies on the ability of ASO to form a triple helix by binding to DNA strands, which leads to inhibition of transcription initiation. Antisense oligonucleotides enter plant cells and inhibit the expression of target genes [41]. There have been many successful attempts to implement this approach for a large number of plants, including Nicotiana tabacum [42], Arabidopsis thaliana, Triticum aestvium [43], and Linum usitatissimum [44,45,46].
The first report concerning gene regulation by synthetic ASOs in plant cells dates back to 1992, when Tsutsumi and co-workers demonstrated that a specific ASO against barley α-amylase can block in vitro mRNA translation and decrease α-amylase activity in barley aleurone layers [47]. Initially, this ASO was used to study gene function in seeds and pollen tubes [41]. Almost immediately after Tsutsumi et al. published their results, this approach began to be used by other researchers, since the high permeability of the cell wall of pollen tubes makes them a convenient model. One of the first of these studies was carried out in 1994 by Estruch et al. [48]. The next breakthrough step in the application of ASO was the use of ASO sequences in green tissue of barley [49] and then further for the whole plant [50]. Currently, more and more research is aimed at obtaining economic benefits when using non-transgenic methods of plant modification [51] and protection [34,35,52]. However, with respect to the essential oils of plants, no one has yet attempted to modify their composition and yield with help of ASO.
Over the past 30 years, since the beginning of the use of ASO on plants, research has focused primarily on testing whether this technology works effectively. The alpha-amylase gene, calcium-dependent calmodulin-independent protein kinase, nuclear-encoded phytoenedesaturase, chlorophyll a/b-binding protein, chloroplast-encoded light-harvesting protein, and transcription factor SUSIBA2 were among those used. The research mainly involved genes whose function does not lead to the accumulation of valuable components of plant cells that can lead to economic benefits, such as secondary metabolites.
Thus, the ASO approach has been proven to be a simple and effective way to influence the expression of plant genes. This technology is suitable for both dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants, especially in cases where it is difficult to obtain transgenic plants. In addition, it should be noted that this approach is more accessible than the usual methods of plant breeding and has more flexibility in the case of the undesirable mutations that constantly occur.
The availability of this approach for large scale application is largely determined by the price of oligonucleotide synthesis. For the synthesis of oligonucleotides, the most widely used method is automatic solid-phase phosphoramidite synthesis, which makes it possible to obtain the desired oligonucleotide sequences relatively quickly, with high yield and purity [53,54], to solve a wide range of tasks. However, solid-phase synthesis is not particularly efficient, consuming on average several times more than the required amounts of reagents to create oligonucleotide strands. In addition, expensive automated nucleic acid synthesizers and large amounts of controlled-pore glass, which is the most expensive component of solid-phase synthesis, are used in solid-phase synthesis.
A rational alternative to this technology is liquid-phase synthesis, which can significantly reduce the cost of the process by removing the need to use expensive controlled-pore glass [55], reduced waste of phosphoramidites, and transference of synthesis to chemical reactors, which obviates the need for expensive automatic synthesizers [56,57,58]. According to approximate calculations, liquid-phase synthesis will reduce the cost of oligonucleotides by a factor of 100. While the Achilles’ heel of liquid-phase synthesis is its lack of automation, it is clearly more competitive compared to solid-phase synthesis for obtaining short oligonucleotides, such as DNA insecticides [59] and DNA preparations [60,61]. This includes the DNA regulators of secondary metabolism of essential oil plants (antisense oligoilators), which will allow large volumes of targeted short nucleic acid sequences to be produced at a low cost.
It should be noted that unmodified oligonucleotides, particularly oligoilators, have a zero (or minimal) carbon footprint. This feature gives oligoilators a competitive edge in the effort to reduce global warming in the industrial era. Studies show that neither the substances necessary for synthesis, nor the phosphoramidite synthesis of DNA itself, leads to any noticeable release of greenhouse gases [62].
Although data on plant genomes are growing exponentially, to date, the complete genomes of fewer than 400 higher plants have been sequenced [63], among which most are crops of great economic importance, along with a number of species that serve as model objects in biology. Nevertheless, today the sequencing of a new generation is flourishing and genome data will accumulate exponentially.

4. Field of Lavender Dreams: A Magic Wand Made of an Oligonucleotide Strand

Provence is an authentic and unique region in France that has become a symbol of lavender cultivation, a brand known to the whole world. Climatic, soil, and landscape factors helped to determine the specialization of this region into one of agricultural production. However, current trends require up-to-date approaches to production: the rapidly growing demand for essential oils and extracts forces farmers to look for new breakthrough biotechnologies that can rightfully become a worthy alternative to traditional breeding or expensive methods of genetic modification.
Our pioneering developments [33,64] are the basis for investigations of the idea of a biotechnological “Provence“ of the future, where it will be possible to control the aromatic components of essential oils with the help of antisense oligonucleotides. In particular, successful management of the synthesis of secondary metabolites by plants was demonstrated in peppermint (Mentha piperita) using an unmodified antisense oligonucleotide of oligoMEP-11 (5′-ACACTCTTTTG-3′), which is complementary to the mRNA of the menthone reductase that catalyzes the formation of menthol from menthone (Table 1). Peppermint leaves were treated with antisense oligonucleotides at a concentration of 2 mg/m2. Analysis of the composition of the essential oil was carried out 4 days after the treatment. The menthol content of the oligoMEP-11 group was 2.03 times less than content measured in the control group (13.12 ± 1.64% vs. 6.47 ± 1.04%, respectively; p < 0.05). The decrease in menthol content was accompanied by a significant increase in menthone content compared with control (61.20 ± 1.31% vs. 53.5 ± 1.74%, respectively; p < 0.05). The control oligoYM-11 fragment (5′-CGTACGTACGT-3′) did not affect the accumulation of menthol or menthone (p > 0.05). This biotechnology may allow manufacturers of essential oils to be faster and more flexible in their work, without harming nature. Though menthol is a more valuable component than menthone, for us it was important to show viability of the approach first of all.
To demonstrate the flexibility of this approach, we applied ASO in our experiments on lavender to increase the concentration of linalyl acetate in the lavender oil [33]. The existing developments in this area, namely the method of increasing the content of linalyl acetate in the essential oil of narrow-leaved lavender plants using unmodified ASOs, confirms the viability of this approach [33,34]. Work on the impact on the biosynthetic apparatus of lavender cells includes the use of ASO complementary to mRNA of the linalool synthase gene. We treated plants with aqueous solutions of the antisense oligoilator LAVAN-11 (5′-GCAACAATCC-3′) from a cold fog generator with a drop size of 10–20 microns (15 mg/m2) at a consumption rate of 10 mL of solution per bush (with a diameter of 1 m) in the full flowering phase, 4–5 days before harvesting inflorescences. An increase in the content of linalyl acetate by 8.64 ± 1.45% and a decrease in linalool of 6.13 ± 0.49% was achieved (Table 2). Significant differences (p < 0.05) were found between the control groups and LAVAN-11 on the fourth day after treatment. The concentrations of linalool and linalyl acetate in the controls were 43.52 ± 0.50% and 21.91 ± 0.73% (p < 0.05), respectively, and in bushes treated with LAVAN-11, 37.39 ± 0.99% and 30.55 ± 2.18% (p < 0.05), respectively. The control (random) fragment C-11 (5′-CCCCCCCCCCC-3′) did not show a significant effect on the percentage composition of essential oil components and its total yield [64,65].
Lavandin (Lavandula x intermedia), which is a sterile hybrid of Lavandula latifolia and Lavandula angustifolia, has a higher yield in contrast to lavender; therefore, it is highly valued by manufacturers of cosmetic products that place fewer requirements on raw materials than manufacturers of parfumeria [66]. Even a higher camphor content, which gives a coarser smell to lavender oil, is not an obstacle to its use in industrial production. In our opinion, there are undeservedly few publications on the research of lavandin. In addition, lavandin oil is equated with the falsification of lavender oil, which is fundamentally wrong. Moreover, it has found its niche in the cosmetics industry, steadily gaining a foothold there and not giving up its position on economic turnover. Therefore, these oils must be clearly delimited, because each of them takes place in different branches of industrial production. In our triplicate field experiments, the effect of oligoilator LAVAN-11 with the rate of consumption 10 mg/m2 on lavandin was demonstrated. The analysis of the component composition of the essential oil was carried out on the Chromatec-Kristall 5000 gas chromatography equipment (Chromatec, Joshkar-Ola, Russia). Our study of LAVAN-11 on lavandin showed an increase in the yield of essential oil by 11.48 ± 2.42% (p < 0.05) on the fourth day after treatment. The component content of the essential oil, however, has undergone minor changes. The most significant result in this regard was a decrease in the concentration of camphor by 5.28 ± 1.22% (p < 0.05), which, as mentioned above, causes a reduced level of aromatic properties of lavandin oil compared to lavender. This presents an interesting combination of effects: an increase in the yield of essential oil while improving its aromatic properties may also interest the perfume industry, because then it will be possible to find a conditional “compromise” between the price, composition, and quality of raw materials. This effect gives promising prospects for the use of LAVAN-11 in the production of lavender and lavandin essential oil.
Our results demonstrate how the use of preparations based on antisense DNA oligoilators acted selectively on the expression of the linalool synthase gene. A schematic diagram of the use of antisense oligoilators to enhance synthesis of valuable components in plant essential oils is shown in Figure 4.
The antisense oligoilator LAVAN-11 of the linalool synthase gene of lavender blocks the synthesis of the linalool synthase enzyme responsible for the biosynthesis of linalool from geranyl diphosphate. This in turn blocks the synthesis of linalool, which leads to a change in the trajectory of the secondary metabolism cascade and the conversion of accumulated linalool to linalyl acetate. The fine details of the mechanism of action of antisense oligoilators are currently being studied by our research team. As a rule, oligoilators work according to the general mechanism of action of unmodified ASOs, altering the expression of the target linalool synthase gene.
It should be noted that the complex application of oligoilators together with oligonucleotide insecticides, briefly olinscides, can give a significant increase in crop yields. Among the essential oil plants, such as lavender, mint, sage, etc., there are insect pests from the order of Hemiptera [67]. On representatives of families of Hemiptera olinscides show high speeds of action and efficiency [35]. Olinscides along with oligoilators, 4–5 days before harvesting essential oil plants, make it possible to reduce the content of insect pests in plant raw materials, and also make it possible to accumulate more essential oil in the last days before harvesting. The idea of using unique sequences of antisense oligonucleotides provides the necessary multi-purpose effect without cross-interference, which could reduce the effect of the combined use of olinscides and oligoilators. For each plant-insect pest pair, it is possible to create unique effective pairs of oligoilators and olinscides. Thus, antisense oligonucleotides can play an important role in the functioning of agrocenoses, gradually revealing the potential for effective and safe molecular crop management in green agriculture.
The main problem facing the essential oils market is the falsification and use of synthetic aromatic substances that do not have the beneficial properties of natural oils, but only imitate the aromas. This situation has developed due to the increasing demand for oils and the high cost of natural raw materials. To address this, it is necessary to create various technologies that help the agricultural sector to intensify cultivation, namely, to obtain more high-quality raw materials from a smaller area. The recent coronavirus pandemic and the increase in demand for sustainable, natural products has created a favorable environment for the development and use of such biotechnological techniques.
It should be noted that from an environmental point of view, the use of olinscides and oligoilators is safe. All biological components of ecosystems (producers, consumers, reducers) are interconnected by a large number of ecological connections. Possible xenobiotics involved in trophic chains become more mobile and go beyond the scope of primary use, bioconcentrate and biotransform, in some cases forming even more toxic substances. In addition, the penetration of chemical agents into the deep layers of the soil leads to contamination of groundwater. Since most modern chemical preparations have a relatively long half-life, there is an increase in the concentration of the target chemical agent in the ecosystem during the transition from a low to a higher trophic level. As a result of the use of persistent chemicals in agriculture and forestry, they will always cause poisoning of participants of trophic levels of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, where for most chemical agents (xenobiotics) there are no enzymes that can catalyze their rapid decomposition. Thus, the only safe way in agriculture is the use of natural molecules that can be safe and effective at the same time. The oligonucleotide preparations considered in this work have a high level of environmental friendliness because at each trophic level, target and non-target organisms have deoxyriboribonuclease (DNase) enzymes [68].
Application of both oligonucleotide preparations, oligoilators and olinscides, on plants is appropriate to the case, for example, to common pests of lavender cicadas Lepironia coleoptrata L., Agalmatium bilobum Fieb., Philaenus spumarius L. [69], spider mites Tetranychus sp., and various species of the Chrysomelidae family [70]. It is recommended to be carried out using a knapsack sprayer or a cold mist generator with a drop size of 10–20 microns and changing the angle of attack so that the preparation gets on the entire leaf surface of plants. From 10 to 150 g of each of the preparations dissolved, olinscides and oligoilators in 100–120 L of distilled water will be enough per hectare of lavender field. During treatment, it is recommended to avoid getting the preparation with air into the lungs by using anti-aerosol respirators and protective glasses for the eyes because the possible non-specific action of olinscides and oligoilators have not been studied enough. Oligonucleotide preparations are recommended to be lyophilized after synthesis and stored in polypropylene containers in a cool dry place at room temperature away from sunlight or in a refrigerator at 5–8 °C. The water solution with DNA preparations should be prepared before processing the field. The absence of destruction of the active substance of the preparation can be assessed by nucleic acid electrophoresis using the appropriate freshly prepared standard olinscide or oligoilator in 3–4% agarose gel, or by MALDI-TOF spectrometer. Synthesis of active substances of oligonucleotides is possible by phosphoramidite method on DNA synthesizers of the ASM-800 (Biosset, Novosibirsk, Russia), PolyGen (PolyGen GmbH, Langen, Germany) type, etc.
Thus, to date, the state of agrocenoses requires expanding the possibilities of their stabilization through the creation and use of new generation DNA preparations related to the biologization of agricultural techniques. In this regard, oligoilators and olinscides are a promising development, acting and metabolizing according to molecular mechanisms created by nature, which are able to reduce the concentration of organic xenobiotics in ecosystems.

5. Conclusions

The proposed ASO technology, based on antisense oligoilators and olinscides that increase the yield and the concentration of essential oil components and simultaneously control insect pests, is quite simple and easy to use. The first experiments carried out by our research team have shown that we can, on the one hand, save time, and on the other hand, successfully tackle this immense project and be able to offer a large number of essential oils with subtle notes in aroma and increase crop yield. The rapidly developing and increasingly available next-generation sequencing gives hope that over the next 30 years, data on the genomes of most plants will become available to us, which will open the door to the creation of a biotechnological “Provence” in every part of the world, with land and conditions suitable for the growth of aromatic plants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.V.O.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.V.P.; writing—review and editing, V.V.O., Y.V.P. and I.A.N.; visualization concept, V.V.O., I.A.N. and Y.V.P.; drawing, Y.V.P.; supervision, V.V.O.; funding acquisition, V.V.O. All authors are equally responsible for plagiarism, self-plagiarism or other ethical transgressions. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research results are partially obtained within the framework of a state assignment for V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University for 2021 and the planning period of 2022–2023 No. FZEG-2021-0009 (‘Development of oligonucleotide constructs for making selective and highly effective preparations for medicine and agriculture’, registration number 121102900145-0).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank our many colleagues, too numerous to name, for the technical advances and lively discussions that have prompted us to write this review. We apologize to the many colleagues whose work has not been cited. We are very much indebted to all anonymous reviewers and our colleagues from the lab on DNA technologies, PCR analysis and creation of DNA insecticides (V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Department of Molecular Genetics and Biotechnologies), from the lab on cell technologies and creation of DNA medicines (V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Department of Molecular Genetics and Biotechnologies) and Olinscise Biotech LLC. for valuable comments on our manuscript. We are very thankful to Georgia Morgan for English language editing service.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lenaerts, B.; Collard, B.C.Y.; Demont, M. Review: Improving global food security through accelerated plant breeding. Plant Sci. 2019, 287, 110207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zimny, T.; Sowa, S.; Tyczewska, A.; Twardowski, T. Certain new plant breeding techniques and their marketability in the context of EU GMO legislation—Recent developments. New Biotechnol. 2019, 51, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Butt, H.; Eid, A.; Momin, A.A.; Bazin, J.; Crespi, M.; Arold, S.T.; Mahfouz, M.M. CRISPR directed evolution of the spliceosome for resistance to splicing inhibitors. Gen. Biol. 2019, 20, 1–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Shrivastava, P.; Kumar, R. Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 22, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Zhang, G.; Biradar, C.M.; Xiao, X.; Dong, J.; Zhou, Y.; Qin, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, F.; Ding, M.; Thomas, R.J. Exacerbated grassland degradation and desertification in Central Asia during 2000–2014. Ecol. Appl. 2018, 28, 442–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Chang, T.-H.; Hsiech, F.L.; Ko, T.P.; Teng, K.-H.; Liang, P.-H.; Wang, A.H. Structure of a Heterotetrameric Geranyl Pyrophosphate Synthase from Mint (Mentha piperita) Reveals Intersubunit Regulation. Plant Cell. 2010, 22, 454–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Boncan, D.A.T.; Tsang, S.S.K.; Li, C.; Lee, I.H.T.; Lam, H.-M.; Chan, T.-F.; Hui, J.H.L. Terpenes and Terpenoids in Plants: Interactions with Environment and Insects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 21, 7382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zheng, X.; Xu, H.; Ma, X.; Zhan, R.; Chen, W. Triterpenoid Saponin Biosynthetic Pathway Profiling and Candidate Gene Mining of the Ilex asprella Root Using RNA-Seq. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 5970–5987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Jia, Q.D.; Chen, F. Catalytic functions of the isoprenyl diphosphate synthase superfamily in plants: A growing repertoire. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 189–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Hsieh, F.-L.; Chang, T.-H.; Ko, T.-P.; Wang, A.H.-J. Structure and Mechanism of an Arabidopsis Medium/Long-Chain-Length Prenyl Pyrophosphate Synthase. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 1079–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Gallego-Jara, J.; Lozano-Terol, G.; Sola-Martínez, R.A.; Cánovas-Díaz, M.; de Diego Puente, T.A. Compressive Review about Taxol®: History and Future Challenges. Molecules 2020, 25, 5986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Xiong, Y.; Huang, J. Anti-malarial drug: The emerging role of artemisinin and its derivatives in liver disease treatment. Chin. Med. 2021, 16, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Caputi, L.; Aprea, E. Use of terpenoids as natural flavouring compounds in food industry. Recent Pat. Food Nutr. Agric. 2011, 3, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rivera-Madrid, R.; Carballo-Uicab, V.M.; Cárdenas-Conejo, Y.; Aguilar-Espinosa, M.; Siva, R. Overview of carotenoids and beneficial effects on human health. In Carotenoids: Properties, Processing and Applications; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yuan, R.; Zhang, D.; Yang, J.; Wu, Z.; Luo, C.; Han, L.; Yang, F.; Lin, J.; Yang, M. Review of aromatherapy essential oils and their mechanism of action against migraines. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 265, 113326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Man, A.; Santacroce, L.; Jacob, R.; Mare, A.; Man, L. Antimicrobial Activity of Six Essential Oils Against a Group of Human Pathogens: A Comparative Study. Pathogens 2019, 8, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Abers, M.; Schroeder, S.; Goelz, L.; Sulser, A.; St Rose, T.; Puchalski, K.; Langland, J. Antimicrobial activity of the volatile substances from essential oils. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2021, 21, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Falleh, H.; Jemaa, M.B.; Saada, M.; Ksouri, R. Essential oils: A promising eco-friendly food preservative. Food Chem. 2020, 330, 127268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Getahun, T.; Sharma, V.; Gupta, N. The genus Laggera (Asteraceae)—Ethnobotanical and Ethnopharmacological Information, Chemical Composition as well as Biological Activities of Its Essential Oils and Extracts: A Review. Chem. Biodivers. 2019, 16, e1900131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nahar, L.; El-Seedi, H.R.; Khalifa, S.A.; Mohammadhosseini, M.; Sarker, S.D. Ruta Essential Oils: Composition and Bioactivities. Molecules 2021, 26, 4766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. El-Shemy, H.A. Potential of Essential Oils; InTech: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Barbieri, C.; Borsotto, P. Essential oils: Market and legislation. In Potential of Essential Oils; InTech: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Torres Neto, L.; Monteiro, M.L.G.; Galvan, D.; Conte-Junior, C.A. An Evaluation of the Potential of Essential Oils against SARS-CoV-2 from In Silico Studies through the Systematic Review Using a Chemometric Approach. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bochar, D.A.; Friesen, J.A.; Stauffacher, C.V.; Rodwell, V.W. Comprehensive Natural Product Chemistry: Isoprenoids Including Carotenoids and Isoprenoids; Cane, D.E., Ed.; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1999; Volume 2, pp. 15–44. [Google Scholar]
  25. Grochowski, L.L.; Xu, H.; White, R.H. Methenocaldococcus jannaschii uses a modified mevalonate pathway for biosynthesis of isopentenyl diphosphate. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 3192–3198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Hemmerlin, A.; Harwood, J.L.; Bach, T.J. A raison d’être for two distinct pathways in the early steps of plant isoprenoid biosynthesis? Prog. Lipid Res. 2012, 51, 95–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bouvier, F.; Rahier, A.; Camara, B. Biogenesis, molecular regulation and function of plant isoprenoids. Prog. Lipid Res. 2005, 44, 357–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Adam, P.; Hecht, S.; Eisenreich, W.; Kaiser, J.; Grawert, T.; Arigoni, D.; Bacher, A.; Rohdich, F. Biosynthesis of terpenes: Studies on 1- hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl 4-diphosphate reductase. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 12108–12113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Dillies, M.-A.; Rau, A.; Aubert, J.; Antier, C.H.; Jeanmougin, M.; Servant, N. A comprehensive evaluation of normalization methods for Illumina high-throughput RNA sequencing data analysis. Brief. Bioinform. 2013, 14, 671–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Chen, C.; Zheng, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Wu, Y.; Li, Z.; Xu, L.; Xu, M. Transcriptome analysis and identification of genes related to terpenoid biosynthesis in Cinnamomum camphora. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Adal, A.M.; Sarker, L.S.; Malli, R.P.N.; Liang, P.; Mahmoud, S.S. RNA-Seq in the discovery of a sparsely expressed scent-determining monoterpene synthase in lavender (Lavandula). Plant 2019, 249, 271–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Malli, R.P.; Adal, A.M.; Sarker, L.S.; Liang, P.; Mahmoud, S.S. De novo sequencing of the Lavandula angustifolia genome reveals highly duplicated and optimized features for essential oil production. Planta 2019, 249, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Oberemok, V.V.; Laikova, K.V.; Novikov, I.A.; Galchinsky, N.V.; Useinov, R.Z. Controlling the accumulation of secondary metabolites by plants using antisense oligonucleotides. In Plant Canada; The University of Guelph: Guelph, ON, Canada, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gal’chinsky, N.V.; Useinov, R.Z.; Yatskova, E.V.; Laikova, K.V.; Novikov, I.A.; Gorlov, M.V. A breakthrough in the efficiency of contact DNA insecticides: Rapid high mortality rates in the sap-sucking insects Dynaspidiotus britannicus Comstock and Unaspis euonymi Newstead. J. Plant Prot. Res. 2020, 60, 220–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Useinov, R.Z.; Gal’chinsky, N.V.; Yatskova, E.V.; Novikov, I.A.; Puzanova, Y.V.; Trikoz, N.N.; Sharmagiy, A.K.; Plugatar, Y.V.; Laikova, K.V.; Oberemok, V.V. To bee or not to bee: Creating DNA insecticides to replace non-selective organophosphate insecticides for use against the soft scale insect Ceroplastes japonicus Green. J. Plant Prot. Res. 2020, 60, 406–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Oberemok, V.V.; Laikova, K.V.; Useinov, R.Z.; Gal’chinsky, N.V.; Yurchenko, K.A.; Novikov, I.A. Successful Management of Secondary Metabolite Biosynthesis of Essential Oil Plants Using Unmodified Antisense Oligonucleotides in a Lavandula angustifolia Mill. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Anim. 2020, 56, 42–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kuo, Y.; Falk, B.W. RNA interference approaches for plant disease control. BioTechniques 2020, 69, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kim, K.D.; Kang, Y.; Kim, C. Application of Genomic Big Data in Plant Breeding: Past, Present, and Future. Plants 2020, 9, 1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Oberemok, V.; Laikova, K.; Useinov, R.; Gal’chinsky, N.; Novikov, I.; Gorlov, M. High Mortality of Sap-sucking Insects One Week After Topical Application of DNA Insecticides. Animal Posters. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Anim. 2020, 56, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Puzanova, Y.V.; Novikov, I.A.; Marochkin, N.A.; Eken, E.; Sharmagiy, A.K.; Oberemok, V.V. Another successful target in the suborder Sternorrhyncha (Hemiptera): Green oligonucleotide insecticides for aphid control. In Proceedings of the 2022 Meeting of the Society for In Vitro Biology, Sandiego, CA, USA, 4–7 June 2022; Volume P-3048, pp. 33–34. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wdowikowska, A.; Janicka, M. Antisense oligonucleotide technology as a research tool in plant biology. Funct. Plant Biol. 2021, 49, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liao, Y.W.K.; Sun, Z.H.; Zhou, Y.H.; Shi, K.; Li, X.; Zhang, G.Q. The role of hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide in the induction of plant-encoded RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 1 in the basal defense against tobacco mosaic virus. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e76090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dinç, E.; Tóth, S.Z.; Schansker, G.; Ayaydin, F.; Kovács, L.; Dudits, D. Synthetic antisense oligodeoxynucleotides to transiently suppress different nucleus-and chloroplast-encoded proteins of higher plant chloroplasts. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 1628–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Wojtasik, W.; Kulma, A.; Boba, A.; Szopa, J. Oligonucleotide treatment causes flax β-glucanase up-regulation via changes in gene-body methylation. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Dzialo, M.; Szopa, J.; Czuj, T.; Zuk, M. Oligodeoxynucleotides Can Transiently Up- and Downregulate CHS Gene Expression in Flax by Changing DNA Methylation in a Sequence-Specific Manner. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dzialo, M.; Szopa, J.; Hnitecka, A.; Zuk, M. Transgenerational perpetuation of CHS gene expression and dna methylation status induced by short oligodeoxynucleotides in flax (Linum usitatissimum). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Tsutsumi, N.; Kanayama, K.; Tano, S. Suppression of alpha-amylase gene expression by antisense oligodeoxynucleotide in barley cultured aleurone layers. Jpn. J. Genet. 1992, 67, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Estruch, J.J.; Kadwell, S.; Merlin, E.; Crossland, L. Cloning and characterization of a maize pollen-specific calcium-dependent calmodulin-independent protein kinase. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 8837–8841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sun, C.; Höglund, A.-S.; Olsson, H.; Mangelsen, E.; Jansson, C. Antisense oligodeoxynucleotide inhibition as a potent strategy in plant biology: Identification of SUSIBA2 as a transcriptional activator in plant sugar signalling. Plant J. 2005, 44, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xie, Z.; Sundström, J.F.; Jin, Y.; Liu, C.; Jansson, C.; Sun, C.A. A selection strategy in plant transformation based on antisense oligodeoxynucleotide inhibition. Plant J. 2014, 77, 954–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Zhang, M.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Xu, F.; Ding, M.; Ye, W.; Kawai, Y.; Toda, Y.; Hayashi, Y.; Suzuki, T.; et al. Plasma membrane H+-ATPase overexpression increases rice yield via simultaneous enhancement of nutrient uptake and photosynthesis. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hunter, W.B.; Cooper, W.R.; Sandoval-Mojica, A.F.; McCollum, G.; Aishwarya, V.; Pelz-Stelinski, K.S. Improving Suppression of Hemipteran Vectors and Bacterial Pathogens of Citrus and Solanaceous Plants: Advances in Antisense Oligonucleotides (FANA). Front. Agron. 2021, 3, 675247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, Z.; Siwkowski, A.; Lima, W.F.; Olsen, P.; Ravikumar, V.T. Antisense oligonucleotides: Efficient synthesis of 2′-O-methoxyethyl phosphorothioate oligonucleotides using 4,5-dicyanoimidazole. Are these oligonucleotides comparable to those synthesized using 1H-tetrazole as coupling activator? Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 5049–5060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Prakash, T.P.; Brad Wan, W.; Low, A.; Yu, J.; Chappell, A.E.; Gaus, H.; Kinberger, G.A.; Østergaard, M.E.; Migawa, M.T.; Swayze, E.E.; et al. Solid-phase synthesis of 5′-triantennary N-acetylgalactosamine conjugated antisense oligonucleotides using phosphoramidite chemistry. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 4127–4130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pon, R.T. Solid-Phase Supports for Oligonucleotide Synthesis. Curr. Protoc. Nucleic Acid Chem. 2000, 3.1.1–3.1.28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Bonora, G.M.; Zaramella, S.; Veronese, F.M. Synthesis by high-efficiency liquid-phase (HELP) method of oligonucleotides conjugated with high-molecular weight polyethylene glycols (PEGs). Biol. Proced. Online 1998, 1, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Lönnberg, H. Synthesis of oligonucleotides on a soluble support. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2017, 13, 1368–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Molina, A.G.; Sanghvi, Y.S. Liquid-phase oligonucleotide synthesis: Past, present, and future predictions. Curr. Protoc. Nucleic Acid Chem. 2019, 77, e82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Nyadar, P.M.; Adeyemi, T.A. DNA insecticides: The lethal potency of LdMNPV IAP-2 gene antisense oligonucleotides in pre-infected gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) larvae. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2018, 64, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Laikova, K.V.; Oberemok, V.V.; Krasnodubets, A.; Gal’chinsky, N.V.; Useinov, R.Z.; Novikov, I.A. Advances in the Understanding of Skin Cancer: Ultraviolet Radiation, Mutations, and Antisense Oligonucleotides as Anticancer Drugs. Molecules 2019, 24, 1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Makalish, T.P.; Golovkin, I.O.; Oberemok, V.V.; Laikova, K.V.; Temirova, Z.Z.; Serdyukova, O.A.; Novikov, I.A.; Rosovskyi, R.A.; Gordienko, A.I.; Zyablitskaya, E.Y.; et al. Anti-Rheumatic Effect of Antisense Oligonucleotide Cytos-11 Targeting TNF-α Expression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gal’chinsky, N.V.; Yatskova, E.V.; Novikov, I.A.; Useinov, R.Z.; Kouakou, N.J.; Kouame, K.F.; Kra, K.D.; Sharmagiy, A.K.; Plugatar, Y.V.; Laikova, K.V.; et al. Icerya purchasi Maskell (Hemiptera: Monophlebidae) Control Using Low Carbon Footprint Oligonucleotide Insecticides. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. PlaBi-PD Data Base. Available online: http://www.plabipd.de (accessed on 22 November 2022).
  64. Oberemok, V.V. Ecological Basis for Controlling the Number of Leaf-Eating Insects Using DNA Insecticides. Ph.D. Thesis, V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Simferopol, Crimea, 2019. Available online: http://obr.nbgnsc.ru/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Диccepтaция_Oбepeмoк-BB_-экoлoгия-и-зaщитa-pacтeний.pdf (accessed on 18 June 2023).
  65. Novikov, I.A. A Method for Increasing the Content of Linalyl Acetate in the Essential Oil of Narrow-Leaved Lavender (Lavandula angustifolia Mill.). Russian Patent RU 2.743.395.C1, 18 February 2021. [Google Scholar]
  66. Pokajewicz, K.; Czarniecka-Wiera, M.; Krajewska, A.; Maciejczyk, E.; Wieczorek, P.P. Lavandula × intermedia—A Bastard Lavender or a Plant of Many Values? Part I. Biology and Chemical Composition of Lavandin. Molecules 2023, 28, 2943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Blackman, R.L.; Eastop, V.F. Aphids on the World’s Crops—An Identification and Information Guide. In The Natural History Museum; John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  68. Oberemok, V.V.; Laikova, K.V.; Gal’chinsky, N.V.; Useinov, R.Z.; Novikov, I.A.; Temirova, Z.Z.; Shumskykh, M.N.; Krasnodubets, A.M.; Repetskaya, A.I.; Dyadichev, V.V.; et al. DNA insecticide developed from the Lymantria dispar 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene provides a novel biotechnology for plant protection. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Drobotova, E.N. Pests of Essential Oil Crops Grown at the Research Institute of Agriculture of Crimea. V International Scientific Conference ‘Current State, Problems and Prospects of the Development of Agrarian Science. Simferopol, Russia. 2020, pp. 47–49. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Pests-of-essential-oil-crops-grown-at-the-Research-Drobotova/8f80b6e465bdcf18984f84a9db2a6efef611e879 (accessed on 18 June 2023).
  70. Nardi, G.; Vomero, V. (Eds.) Artropodi del parco nazionale del Vesuvio: Ricerche preliminari. In Conservazione Habitat Invertebrati; Centro Nazionale per lo Studio e la Conservazione della Biodiversità Forestale: Verona, Italy, 2007; Volume 4, pp. 377–454. [Google Scholar]
Horticulturae 09 00896 g001
Figure 1. Some representatives of various classes of terpenes (monoterpenes, sesqueterpenes, diterpenes).
Figure 1. Some representatives of various classes of terpenes (monoterpenes, sesqueterpenes, diterpenes).
Horticulturae 09 00896 g001
Horticulturae 09 00896 g002
Figure 2. Geranyl diphosphate synthesis via the MEP or the via the MVA pathway. Compounds involved in the biosynthesis are as follows: 1—pyruvate, 2—D−glyceraldehyde 3−phosphate, 3—1−deoxy−D−xylulose−5−phosphate, 4—2−C−methyl D−erythritol−4−phosphate, 5—4−diphosphocytidyl− 2−C-methyl−D−erythritol, 6—4−diphosphocytidyl−2−C−methyl−D−erythritol 2−phosphate, 7—2−C−methyl−D−erythritol 2,4−cyclodiphosphate, 8—1−hydroxy−2−methyl−2−(E)−butenyl−4−diphosphate, 9—acetyl coenzyme A, 10—acetoacetyl−coenzyme A, 11—3−hydroxy−3−methylglutaryl coenzyme A, 12—mevalonic acid, 13—mevalonate 5−phosphate, 14—mevalonate 5−diphosphate, 15—dimethylallyl pyrophosphate, 16—isopentenyl pyrophosphate, 17—geranyl diphosphate. Enzymes of pathways are as follows: DXS—1−deoxy−D−xylulose 5−phosphate synthase, DXR—1−deoxy−D−xylulose 5−phosphate reductoisomerase, MCT—2−C−methyl−D−erythritol−4−phosphate cytidyltransferase, CMK—4−diphosphocytidyl−2−C−methyl−D−erythritol kinase, MDS—2−C−methyl−D−erythritol 2,4−cyclodiphosphate synthase, HDS—1−hydroxy−2−methyl−2−(E)−butenyl 4-diphosphate synthase, HDR—1−hydroxy−2−methyl−2−(E)−butenyl 4−diphosphate reductase, AACT—acetoacetyl−CoA thiolase, HMGS—3−hydroxy−3−methylglutaryl−CoA synthase, HMGR—3−hydroxy−3−methylglutaryl−CoA reductase, MK—mevalonate kinase, PMK—phosphomevalonate kinase, PPMD—diphosphomevalonate decarboxylase, IDI—isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase, GDS—geranyl diphosphate synthase.
Figure 2. Geranyl diphosphate synthesis via the MEP or the via the MVA pathway. Compounds involved in the biosynthesis are as follows: 1—pyruvate, 2—D−glyceraldehyde 3−phosphate, 3—1−deoxy−D−xylulose−5−phosphate, 4—2−C−methyl D−erythritol−4−phosphate, 5—4−diphosphocytidyl− 2−C-methyl−D−erythritol, 6—4−diphosphocytidyl−2−C−methyl−D−erythritol 2−phosphate, 7—2−C−methyl−D−erythritol 2,4−cyclodiphosphate, 8—1−hydroxy−2−methyl−2−(E)−butenyl−4−diphosphate, 9—acetyl coenzyme A, 10—acetoacetyl−coenzyme A, 11—3−hydroxy−3−methylglutaryl coenzyme A, 12—mevalonic acid, 13—mevalonate 5−phosphate, 14—mevalonate 5−diphosphate, 15—dimethylallyl pyrophosphate, 16—isopentenyl pyrophosphate, 17—geranyl diphosphate. Enzymes of pathways are as follows: DXS—1−deoxy−D−xylulose 5−phosphate synthase, DXR—1−deoxy−D−xylulose 5−phosphate reductoisomerase, MCT—2−C−methyl−D−erythritol−4−phosphate cytidyltransferase, CMK—4−diphosphocytidyl−2−C−methyl−D−erythritol kinase, MDS—2−C−methyl−D−erythritol 2,4−cyclodiphosphate synthase, HDS—1−hydroxy−2−methyl−2−(E)−butenyl 4-diphosphate synthase, HDR—1−hydroxy−2−methyl−2−(E)−butenyl 4−diphosphate reductase, AACT—acetoacetyl−CoA thiolase, HMGS—3−hydroxy−3−methylglutaryl−CoA synthase, HMGR—3−hydroxy−3−methylglutaryl−CoA reductase, MK—mevalonate kinase, PMK—phosphomevalonate kinase, PPMD—diphosphomevalonate decarboxylase, IDI—isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase, GDS—geranyl diphosphate synthase.
Horticulturae 09 00896 g002
Horticulturae 09 00896 g003
Figure 3. Molecular mechanisms of ASO action: 1—ASO-mRNA complex interfering splicing; 2—steric blocking of protein synthesis; 3—degradation of the mRNA-ASO complex by RNase H; 4—triple helix: inhibition of initiation of transcription.
Figure 3. Molecular mechanisms of ASO action: 1—ASO-mRNA complex interfering splicing; 2—steric blocking of protein synthesis; 3—degradation of the mRNA-ASO complex by RNase H; 4—triple helix: inhibition of initiation of transcription.
Horticulturae 09 00896 g003
Horticulturae 09 00896 g004
Figure 4. General scheme for the use of antisense oligoilators in controlling plant secondary metabolism of essential oil plants.
Figure 4. General scheme for the use of antisense oligoilators in controlling plant secondary metabolism of essential oil plants.
Horticulturae 09 00896 g004
Table 1. Changes in menthone and menthol content in M. piperita caused by oligoMEP-11.
Table 1. Changes in menthone and menthol content in M. piperita caused by oligoMEP-11.
Oil ComponentVariant of Experiment
ControloligoMEP-11
menthol13.12 ± 1.64%6.47 ± 1.04% *
menthone53.50 ± 1.74%61.20 ± 1.31% *
* p < 0.05
Table 2. Changes in the content of linalyl acetate and linalool in L. angustifolia caused by LAVAN-11.
Table 2. Changes in the content of linalyl acetate and linalool in L. angustifolia caused by LAVAN-11.
Oil ComponentVariant of Experiment
ControlLAVAN-11
linalyl acetate21.91 ± 0.73%30.55 ± 2.18% *
linalool43.52 ± 0.50%37.39 ± 0.99% *
* p < 0.05
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oberemok, V.V.; Puzanova, Y.V.; Novikov, I.A. The Biotechnological “Provence” of the Future Provided by Antisense Oligoilators and Olinscides for Horticulturae. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 896. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9080896

AMA Style

Oberemok VV, Puzanova YV, Novikov IA. The Biotechnological “Provence” of the Future Provided by Antisense Oligoilators and Olinscides for Horticulturae. Horticulturae. 2023; 9(8):896. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9080896

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oberemok, Volodymyr V., Yelizaveta V. Puzanova, and Ilya A. Novikov. 2023. "The Biotechnological “Provence” of the Future Provided by Antisense Oligoilators and Olinscides for Horticulturae" Horticulturae 9, no. 8: 896. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9080896

APA Style

Oberemok, V. V., Puzanova, Y. V., & Novikov, I. A. (2023). The Biotechnological “Provence” of the Future Provided by Antisense Oligoilators and Olinscides for Horticulturae. Horticulturae, 9(8), 896. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9080896

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop