Next Article in Journal
Production and Quality of West Indian Cherry (Malpighia emarginata D. C.) under Salt Stress and NPK Combinations
Previous Article in Journal
γ Aminobutyric Acid (GABA): A Key Player in Alleviating Abiotic Stress Resistance in Horticultural Crops: Current Insights and Future Directions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quality Improvement of Tomato Fruits by Preharvest Application of Chitosan Oligosaccharide
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Horticulturae
Volume 9
Issue 6
10.3390/horticulturae9060648
horticulturae-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Characterization and Expression of CmobHLH Genes in Pumpkin

by
Wenhong Ao
1,2,
Weirong Luo
1,2,
Wenchen Xu
1,2,
Xudong Wang
1,2,
Junjun Liu
1,2 and
Yongdong Sun
1,2,*
1
School of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China
2
Henan Province Engineering Research Center of Horticultural Plant Resource Utilization and Germplasm Enhancement, Xinxiang 453003, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2023, 9(6), 648; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9060648
Submission received: 24 April 2023 / Revised: 23 May 2023 / Accepted: 29 May 2023 / Published: 31 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Genetic Engineering and Quality Improvement in Vegetable Crops)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The transcription factor bHLH gene family plays fundamental roles in plant development and mitigating diverse biotic and abiotic stresses. However, the information of bHLH genes in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) is still unknown. In this current study, 222 CmobHLH genes were identified and mapped onto different chromosomes through bioinformatics analysis in pumpkin. CmobHLH and AtbHLH proteins could be classified into 19 subfamilies according to the phylogenetic tree. CmobHLH proteins within the same subfamily had similar motif composition and gene structures. Gene ontology (GO), cis-regulatory elements (CREs) and protein–protein interaction analyses suggested the potential regulatory roles of CmobHLH genes during the plant development process and abiotic stresses response in pumpkin. Tissue expression patterns based on transcriptome data demonstrated that CmobHLH genes were involved in pumpkin development process, and they had unique functions in different tissues. The expression patterns of five selected CmobHLH genes after exposure to abiotic stresses showed that the CmobHLH genes played varied roles in the stress responses of pumpkin to NaCl, waterlogging, cold, ABA and drought. In brief, these findings offer important information for further functional research of CmobHLH genes and resistance breeding in pumpkin.

1. Introduction

The bHLH gene family is one of the most extensive transcription factor (TF) families found in plants, usually classified into 15–26 subfamilies [1]. bHLH family genes play crucial roles in controlling plant development and tolerating diverse environmental stresses through regulating the expression of downstream target genes [2,3,4]. bHLH family proteins are composed of two functional regions: the basic region located in the N-terminus and the HLH region in the C-terminus [5,6]. The basic region, which has 15–20 amino acids (aa), is primarily involved in binding of TFs through binding to the cis-regulatory elements (CREs) [1,7]. The HLH domain has 40–50 aa and is composed of two α-helices connected by a loop, which can promote protein interactions and form homodimers or heterodimers to induce a range of diverse activities [8,9,10]. Identification of bHLH family genes was initially recorded in maize (Zea mays L.) [11]. Thereafter, an increasing number of bHLH genes were widely characterized in numerous plant species, such as Arabidopsis [12], rice [13], tomato [14], poplar [1], apple [15], eggplant [16], grass pea [17], persimmon [18], sweet wormwood [19] and Ipomoea aquatica [20].
A number of evidence has shown that bHLH family genes are involved in plant development processes [21,22]. For example, the bHLH TF SPATULA (SPT) inhibited root growth and size through limiting cell proliferation and expansion in Arabidopsis [23]. EAT1, a rice bHLH TF regulated programmed cell death (PCD) in tapetal cells [24]. Overexpression of AtbHLH68 and AtbHLH112 suppressed lateral root development in Arabidopsis seedlings [25,26]. Some bHLH genes related to fruit development have also been found. Eleven SlbHLH genes have been reported to participate in young fruit development and ripening in tomato [27]. In melon, CmbHLH32 exhibited higher expression in the process of early fruit development, and overexpression of CmbHLH32 led to early fruit ripening [28]. The MYB-bHLH-WD40 complex was positively associated with anthocyanin accumulation and blueberry fruit color development [29]. Furthermore, bHLH family genes significantly strengthened salinity [30], drought [31,32] and cold [33] tolerance. In grapes, expression of the VvICE1a and VvICE1b genes, two bHLH family genes, improved the stresses tolerance of salinity, drought and cold in transgenic Arabidopsis [34]. In addition, bHLH family genes were involved in the regulation of iron homeostasis. In maize, ZmbHLH105 significantly decreased Mn buildup through suppressing the expression of Mn/Fe-regulated transporter genes [35]. In rice, OsbHLH133 was an important regulator of Fe distribution in the roots and shoots [36]. According to the above reports, bHLH family genes would be great candidate genes for improving stress tolerance and resistance breeding in plants.
Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) is cultivated and consumed around the world with a very high nutritional and health care value [37]. However, diverse environmental stresses, such as salinity, cold and drought severely affect the processes of growth and development in pumpkin. Although some bHLH genes have been elaborated in plants, and overexpression of CmbHLH87 gene in tobacco increased the resistance to powdery mildew [38], there is no report of CmobHLH genes in resistance to abiotic stresses in pumpkin. In this current study, the CmobHLH gene family was identified and characterized in pumpkin through bioinformatics analysis. Furthermore, we investigated the gene transcription patterns under different tissues and different abiotic stresses, which gave crucial insights for further understanding of the functions of CmobHLH genes and resistance breeding in pumpkin.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Identification of CmobHLH Genes in Pumpkin

The AtbHLH genes were found through calling up their gene IDs from TAIR database (https://www.arabidopsis.org/, accessed on 12 February 2023) [39], and 165 Arabidopsis bHLH protein sequences were used as reference sequences to search the pumpkin bHLH proteins from the Cucurbit Genomics Database (CuGenDB) (http://www.cucurbitgenomics.org/, accessed on 12 February 2023) [40]. To search for pumpkin bHLH genes, the Pfam online database (http://pfam-legacy.xfam.org/, accessed on 12 February 2023) [41] was used to obtain the hidden Markov model (HMM) file of the bHLH domain (PF00010). Subsequently, Pfam and Conserved Domain Database (CDD) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/guide/domains-structures/, accessed on 13 February 2023) [42] were used to search the bHLH-conserved domain. Finally, CmobHLH proteins with bHLH-conserved domain were identified in pumpkin. Various physical and chemical properties of the CmobHLH proteins were analyzed using the online ProtParam tool (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 13 February 2023) [43]. Subcellular localization of CmobHLH proteins was predicted using the online tool Plant-mPLoc (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/plant-multi/#, accessed on 13 February 2023) [44].

2.2. Phylogenetic Relationship, Gene Structure and Protein–Protein Interaction Networks of CmobHLH Proteins

Multiple sequence alignments of CmobHLH proteins were conducted using ClustalW software. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method with MEGA 7.0 (the Bootstrap = 1000 and other parameters were set to default values) [45]. The online tool Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) (https://itol.embl.de/, accessed on 14 February 2023) [46] was used to modify and annotate the generated phylogenetic tree. The syntenic analysis of bHLH genes in pumpkin and Arabidopsis was performed using TBtools [47]. The MEME online tool (https://meme-suite.org/meme/tools/meme, accessed on 14 February 2023) [48] was used for the identification of the conserved motifs, with the default parameters and a maximum number of motifs to 10. The gene structures of the CmobHLH genes were exhibited with TBtools. GO analysis was performed using the GO enrichment tool of CuGenDB, and Gene Ontology [49] was used as an additional validation tool. The 2000 bp upstream promoter sequences of 222 CmobHLH genes were retrieved using TBtools and submitted to the online PlantCARE database (https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 14 February 2023) [50] to predict the CREs. Protein–protein interaction networks among CmobHLH proteins were predicted with STRING tool (https://cn.string-db.org/, accessed on 14 February 2023) [51].

2.3. Plant Materials, Growth Conditions and Treatments

A six-generation-inbred line of ‘Hantailang’ was used as the pumpkin material in this study. Pumpkin seeds were germinated at 37 °C for two days, and the germinated seeds were sown in plug trays and grown in the growth chamber under 28 °C with 12 h light and 12 h dark. Pumpkin seedlings at two-leaf stage were treated with different abiotic stresses. For waterlogging, water 2 cm was maintained above the soil surface. For cold, pumpkin seedlings were cultivated at 15 °C day/5 °C night. For ABA and drought stresses, pumpkin seedings were dipped in Hoagland nutrient solution containing 100 μmol ABA and 10% PEG 6000, respectively. Pumpkin leaves were collected on the 10th day after treatment for gene expression analysis.

2.4. Gene Expression Analysis

The transcriptional profiles of CmobHLH genes in different tissues were obtained from the RNA-seq data (PRJNA385310) of interspecific F1 hybrid ‘Shintosa’. The transcriptional profiles of CmobHLH genes under 75 mmol/L NaCl stress for 24 h were obtained from the RNA-seq data (PRJNA437579) of the root apexes of (Cucurbita maxima × Cucurbita moschata) cv. ‘Chaojiquanwang’. In this study, the count of reads was normalized to fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments (FPKM) of CmobHLH genes. An expression heatmap was generated with log2FPKM values. Expression patterns of 5 CmobHLH genes under waterlogging, cold, ABA and drought stresses were performed using qRT-PCR. For this purpose, total RNA from pumpkin leaves of various treatments was extracted using OminiPlant RNA Kit (CWBIO, Suzhou, China), and PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara, Dalian, China) was used to synthesize the first chain cDNA. To demonstrate the expression patterns under diverse stresses, qRT-PCR was performed using TB Green® Premix Ex Taq™ II (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Each experiment included three biological replicates, following the manufacturer’s protocol. Supplementary Table S1 contains the primer sequences of CmobHLH genes and reference gene (CmoActin) used in this investigation. The relative expression levels of CmobHLH genes were quantified using the 2−(ΔΔCt) method [52].

3. Results

3.1. Identification and Characterization of CmobHLH Family Genes

In total, 222 bHLH genes were recognized in pumpkin and renamed as CmobHLH1 to CmobHLH222 based on their chromosomal locations. Based on pumpkin genomic information, they were unevenly placed onto the twenty chromosomes of pumpkin (Figure 1). Chromosome 11 contained the maximum number of CmobHLH genes (19), while chromosome 20 had the minimum number of CmobHLH genes (4). In general, 6–14 CmobHLH genes were present on each chromosome. The characterization of these CmobHLH proteins was presented in Supplementary Table S2. The coding sequence (CDS) lengths of CmobHLH genes varied from 228 to 5469 bp, with 75 to 1822 aa, predicted molecular weight (MW) from 9.32 to 202.73 kDa, isoelectric point (pI) from 4.50 to 9.98 and an instability index (II) from 32.25 to 99.87. The majority of CmobHLH proteins were hydrophilic based on their Grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY) values. The results of subcellular localization revealed that 221 of CmobHLH proteins were located in the nucleus, while only CmobHLH136 was in the cell membrane.

3.2. Phylogenetic Tree and Synteny Analysis of the CmobHLH Proteins

To classify the evolutionary relationships of CmobHLH proteins, the phylogenetic tree was constructed based on 165 AtbHLH and 222 CmobHLH protein sequences. As shown in Figure 2, 387 bHLH proteins were classified into 19 subfamilies. Among them, subfamily 19 comprised the maximum number of CmobHLH proteins (30), followed the subfamily 6 (21), while subfamily 13 contained the minimum number (3). Moreover, CmobHLH proteins and AtbHLH proteins were present in every subfamily; however, the number varied in every subfamily. To further elucidate the synteny of bHLH genes, the synteny map between pumpkin and Arabidopsis was generated. The result showed that 138 CmobHLH genes were determined to be collinear with 103 AtbHLH genes, and 174 orthologous pairs were discovered (Figure 3).

3.3. Conserved Motifs and Gene Structures of CmobHLH Genes

The MEME online program was employed to indicate the conserved motifs in CmobHLH proteins. CmobHLH proteins possessed different number of conserved motifs, ranging from 1–9. CmobHLH proteins from the same subfamily had a common motif composition (Figure 4B). For instance, the CmobHLH proteins in subfamilies 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 18 shared motifs 1, 2, 3 and 4, the CmobHLH proteins in subfamily 4 contained motifs 1 and 2, and the CmobHLH proteins in subfamilies 12, 17 and 19 involved motifs 1, 2, 3 and 5. Furthermore, we found that some of the motifs were only distributed in the specific position of the protein sequences. For example, motif 3 was always distributed at the start of the protein sequences in subfamilies 2, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15, 16 and 18, and motif 5 was almost always distributed at the start of the protein sequences in subfamilies 12, 17 and 19. While motif 4 was almost always distributed at the end of the protein sequences in subfamilies 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15 and 18, motif 7 was distributed at the end of the protein sequences in the subfamily 2. In addition, the exon–intron structures of CmobHLH genes were also investigated to obtain their gene structure characteristics using TBtools software (Figure 4C). The CmobHLH family members had a varied number of exons from 1 to 34. Among them, 18 CmobHLH family members only contained 1 exon, whereas CmobHLH147 had the large number of exons with 34. However, the CmobHLH genes in the same subfamily had a comparable number of exons and introns.

3.4. GO Enrichment and CREs Analysis

To determine the specific functions of CmobHLH genes, 222 CmobHLH genes were annotated with GO enrichment. The findings revealed that the 222 CmobHLH genes were mainly enriched in three categories (Supplementary Table S3). According to the biological process, they were predicted to be involved in the metabolic process, biosynthetic process, gene expression and other processes. Additionally, the majority of CmobHLH genes were annotated to biosynthetic process (146/222). In the cellular component, most of the CmobHLH genes were assigned to the cellular component (174/222). CmobHLH genes were also assigned to the protein complex (40/222), transcription factor complex (39/222) and nucleus (38/222). In the molecular function, most of CmobHLH genes were involved in binding (222/222), protein binding (221/222) and protein dimerization activity (220/222). A part of CmobHLH genes were involved in nucleic acid binding transcription factor activity (39/222), transcription factor activity, sequence-specific DNA binding (39/222) and DNA binding (35/222). A few CmobHLH genes were involved in cytoplasm amino acid binding, carboxylic acid binding and organic acid binding.
To further investigate the potential functions of CmobHLH genes, the CREs in the promoter sequence of each CmobHLH gene were predicted. As shown in Supplementary Table S4, it was discovered that 222 CmobHLH genes contained a plethora of light response elements, such as Box 4, G-box, GT1-motif, I-box and MRE. Plant growth and development CREs were also identified, including CAT-box, CCGTCC-box, GCN4_motif, O2-site and circadian, etc. CREs related to biotic and abiotic stress elements, including ARE, WUN-motif, LTR, STRE and MBS were widely present in the promoter region. Furthermore, phytohormone response elements, such as ABRE, TGA-element, P-box, CGTCA-motif and ERE were found. The different types of CREs presenting in CmobHLH genes indicated functional diversity and complexity.

3.5. Protein–Protein Interaction Networks of CmobHLH Proteins

In this study, most CmobHLH proteins were predicted to have significant interactions (Figure 5). For instance, SPCH (ortholog of CmobHLH207), MUTE (ortholog of CmobHLH70) and FMA (ortholog of CmobHLH164) in coordination with ICE1 (ortholog of CmobHLH127/154/196) could be associated with stomatal differentiation [53]. FBH4 (ortholog of CmobHLH90/111/152/187) and AT5G50915 (ortholog of CmobHLH101/146/195) were involved in the regulation of flowering periods [54]. HEC1 (ortholog of CmobHLH15), HEC3 (ortholog of CmobHLH32/83) and HEC2 (ortholog of CmobHLH49/95) interacted with SPT (ortholog of CmobHLH48) to jointly regulate pistil development [55]. BEE1 (ortholog of CmobHLH148) and CES (ortholog of CmobHLH155) regulated the biosynthesis of BR [56,57]. TT8 (ortholog of CmobHLH20) interacted with TTG1 and TT2 (MYB) to regulate plant growth and development [58,59]. LRL1 (ortholog of CmobHLH60/108/118/141), RSL2 (ortholog of CmobHLH33/47/125), GL3 (ortholog of CmobHLH184) and EGL3 had antagonistic functions in controlling root hair development. ILR3 (ortholog of CmobHLH6/13/36/99/145/117/221) and PYE (ortholog of CmobHLH103/113) were tightly connected to plant response to Fe deficiency [60]. PIF7 (ortholog of CmobHLH5/104/114) and PIF3 (ortholog of CmobHLH58/138) were phytochrome interacting factors [57]. AMS (ortholog of CmobHLH41/128/217) and DYT1 could regulate the development of tapetum [57]. Therefore, CmobHLH genes might be indispensable to regulate the development and stress response in pumpkin, and different genes have different functions.

3.6. Tissue Expression of CmobHLH Genes

We used RNA-seq data to examine the transcriptional levels of CmobHLH genes in the roots, stems, leaves and fruits to ascertain their roles (Figure 6). In the four tissues studied, 222 CmobHLH genes were expressed at varying abundance levels. Three obvious transcriptional clusters were shown, with the higher abundance in cluster I and the lower in cluster III. Furthermore, we found that the expression levels of CmobHLH genes in cluster I were generally high in the four tissues, while CmobHLH55 and CmobHLH179 were the highest in the fruits. A majority of CmobHLH genes in cluster II exhibited higher expression in the stems and roots. However, the expression levels of CmobHLHs in cluster III were generally lower in all four tissues. The various expression profiles of CmobHLH genes in different tissues suggested the different functions in the growth and development of pumpkin.

3.7. Expression Analysis of CmobHLH Genes under Abiotic Stresses

CREs analysis indicated that CmobHLH genes could be associated with stress response. To further explore possible functions under abiotic stresses, expression profiles of five selected CmobHLH genes were detected with the treatments of salinity, waterlogging, cold, ABA and drought. As shown in Figure 7, transcriptional levels of all five CmobHLH genes were up-regulated after 24 h of 75 mmol/L NaCl stress compared with the normal condition. Furthermore, the expression profiles of CmobHLH genes under waterlogging, cold, ABA and drought stresses were analyzed using qRT-PCR. The results demonstrated that five CmobHLH genes exhibited a significantly up-regulated expression under cold, ABA and drought stresses after 10 days, in contrast with the normal condition (Figure 8). However, CmobHLH25, CmobHLH46, CmobHLH81 and CmobHLH167 showed higher expression levels by 1.64-, 1.82-, 1.35-, 1.17-fold under waterlogging stress, respectively, while the expression of CmobHLH98 was down-regulated. From the above results, we learned that the five selected CmobHLH genes could respond to NaCl, waterlogging, cold, ABA and drought stress in pumpkin.

4. Discussion

bHLH TFs have been identified and characterized in many plants. However, information about bHLH genes in resistance to abiotic stresses in pumpkin is missing. In this study, we identified and characterized 222 CmobHLH genes in pumpkin, which were further divided into 19 subfamilies based on their alignment with AtbHLH proteins. Furthermore, CmobHLH proteins within the same subfamily were discovered to have comparable motif composition and gene structures, highlighting the closer evolutionary relationship of CmobHLH proteins in the same subfamily. Ke et al. [61] reported that genes from the same subfamily shared the common evolutionary origin and similar physiological functions.
The CREs analysis in the promoter regions offers a theoretical foundation for investigating the physiological functions of CmobHLH genes. bHLH genes have been reported to participate in phytohormone signal crosstalk, which plays crucial roles in plant development and response to various abiotic stresses [62,63,64,65,66,67]. Previous studies have also shown the expression profiles of bHLH genes in response to salicylic acid (SA), 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA) [68] and jasmonic acid (JA) [69]. In this study, there were a series of CREs in the promoters of CmobHLH genes, including light, plant growth and development, abiotic stresses and plant phytohormones, suggesting that these genes serve as regulators that are widely involved in growth and development, as well as various stress responses in pumpkin. In addition, GO annotation and protein–protein interaction networks also indicated the important roles of CmobHLH genes in pumpkin development and stress response.
Transcriptome data in the different tissues, as well as protein–protein interaction networks analysis, might aid in predicting the potential roles of the studied genes. In Prunus mume, many PmbHLH genes were specifically expressed in the roots, implying that they might be connected to root development [57]. In fig, a large number of FcbHLH genes exhibited widespread expression in the fruits, indicating that FcbHLH genes play a significant role in fig fruit development [70]. In this current study, 222 CmobHLH genes were divided into three clusters according to their abundance levels, and the expression profiles of CmobHLH genes varied in different tissues. For example, CmobHLH55 and CmobHLH179 were the highest in the fruits, and the majority of CmobHLH genes in cluster II exhibited higher expression in the stems and roots, which suggested the unique functions of CmobHLH genes in pumpkin development. Additionally, bHLH TFs have also been discovered to play an essential role in the process of plant response to abiotic stresses [71]. For instance, in grass pea, most of LsbHLH genes showed higher expression levels under 75 mM NaCl treatment [17]. In cucumber, the expression profile of CsbHLH032 was down-regulated after 4 °C treatment [72]. In Hibiscus hamabo, HhbHLH20 displayed significantly lower expression in response to ABA stress [73]. In Mongolian oak, the expression levels of QmbHLH81 and QmbHLH30 first increased significantly and then decreased remarkably with PEG 6000 treatment [74]. In sorghum, SbbHLH045 showed significant up-regulation under flooding stress [75]. This current study showed that CmobHLH25, CmobHLH46, CmobHLH81, CmobHLH98 and CmobHLH167 exhibited an increased expression after 24 h of NaCl stress and 10 days of cold, ABA and drought, indicating that CmobHLH genes might play the vital roles in NaCl, cold, ABA and drought stresses. Additionally, CmobHLH25 and CmobHLH46 were significantly expressed after 10 days of waterlogging stress, indicating an opposite pattern for CmobHLH25 and CmobHLH46 in response to waterlogging stress. Our results were aligned with previous reports on Andrographis paniculate [68], banana [76] and foxtail millet [77]. In summary, CmobHLH genes might mediate the stress response of pumpkin to NaCl, cold, ABA, drought and waterlogging, but the activities of individual CmobHLH genes were different with the different stress. Further research is required to comprehend the functions of CmobHLH genes through performing a gain-of-function or loss-of-function assay.

5. Conclusions

In general, we identified 222 CmobHLH genes in pumpkin. Furthermore, a systematic investigation was carried out, including chromosomal localization, protein properties, phylogenetic tree, synteny analysis, conserved motifs, gene structures, GO enrichment, CREs and protein–protein interaction networks. Gene expression patterns in different tissues and response to abiotic stresses were examined in pumpkin. Our results present a systematic understanding of the characterization and demonstrated the potential roles in development and stress response in pumpkin, which would provide foundation for further studies on the functions and regulatory mechanisms of CmobHLH genes in specific environments.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/horticulturae9060648/s1, Table S1: Primer sequences for CmobHLHs; Table S2: Gene ID, and physical and chemical properties of CmobHLHs; Table S3: GO annotation of CmobHLH genes; Table S4: The distribution of cis-regulatory elements in CmobHLH promoter sequences.

Author Contributions

Y.S. conceived and designed the experiments. W.A. carried out the experiments. W.A., W.L., W.X., X.W. and J.L. analyzed the data, prepared figures and tables. W.A. wrote the manuscript. Y.S. reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Key Research and Development Program of Henan Province (No. 232102110177).

Data Availability Statement

The data are available by contacting the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Carretero-Paulet, L.; Galstyan, A.; Villanova, I.R.; Martinez-Garcia, J.; Bilbao-Castro, J.R.; Robertson, D.L. Genome-wide classification and evolutionary analysis of the bHLH family of transcription factors in Arabidopsis, poplar, rice, moss, and algae. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 1398–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rehman, S.; Mahmood, T. Functional role of DREB and ERF transcription factors: Regulating stress-responsive network in plants. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2015, 37, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhou, X.; Liao, Y.L.; Kim, S.-U.; Chen, Z.X.; Nie, G.P.; Cheng, S.Y.; Ye, J.B.; Xu, F. Genome-wide identification and characterization of bHLH family genes from Ginkgo biloba. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Qian, Y.C.; Zhang, T.Y.; Yu, Y.; Gou, L.P.; Yang, J.T.; Xu, J.; Pi, E. Regulatory mechanisms of bHLH transcription factors in plant adaptive responses to various abiotic stresse. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 677611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nuno, P.; Liam, D. Origin and diversification of basic-helix-loop-helix proteins in plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27, 862–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ke, Y.Z.; Wu, Y.W.; Zhou, H.J.; Chen, P.; Wang, M.M.; Liu, M.M.; Li, P.F.; Yang, J.; Li, J.N.; Du, H. Genome-wide survey of the bHLH super gene family in Brassica napus. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 827–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Buck, M.J.; Atchley, W.R. Phylogenetic analysis of plant basic helix-loop-helix proteins. J. Mol. Evol. 2003, 56, 742–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Massari, M.E.; Murre, C. Helix-loop-helix proteins: Regulators of transcription in eucaryotic organisms. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hiroshi, A.; Takeshi, U.; Takuya, I.; Motoaki, S.; Kazuo, S.; Kazuko, Y.-S. Arabidopsis AtMYC2 (bHLH) and AtMYB2 (MYB) function as transcriptional activators in abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 63–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, R.H.; Li, Y.Y.; Gao, M.G.; Han, M.; Liu, H.L. Genome-wide identification and characterization of the bHLH gene family and analysis of their potential relevance to chlorophyll metabolism in Raphanus sativus L. BMC Genom. 2022, 23, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ludwig, S.R.; Habera, L.F.; Dellaporta, S.L.; Wessler, S.R. Lc, a member of the maize R gene family responsible for tissue-specific anthocyanin production, encodes a protein similar to transcriptional activators and contains the myc-homology region. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 7092–7096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Toledo-Ortiz, G.; Huq, E.; Quail, P.H. The Arabidopsis basic/helix-loop-helix transcription factor family. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 1749–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, X.X.; Duan, X.P.; Jiang, H.X.; Sun, Y.J.; Tang, Y.P.; Yuan, Z.; Guo, J.K.; Liang, W.Q.; Chen, L.; Yin, J.Y.; et al. Genome-wide analysis of basic/helix-loop-helix transcription factor family in rice and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 1167–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, J.Y.; Hu, Z.Z.; Zhao, T.M.; Yang, Y.W.; Chen, T.Z.; Yang, M.L.; Yu, W.G.; Zhang, B.L. Genome-wide analysis of bHLH transcription factor and involvement in the infection by yellow leaf curl virus in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yang, J.; Gao, M.; Huang, L.; Wang, Y.; van Nocker, S.; Wan, R.; Guo, C.; Wang, X.; Gao, H. Identification and expression analysis of the apple (Malus × domestica) basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor family. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xi, H.C.; He, Y.J.; Chen, H.Y. Functional characterization of SmbHLH13 in anthocyanin biosynthesis and flowering in eggplant. Hortic. Plant J. 2020, 7, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alsamman, A.M.; Abdelsattar, M.; El Allali, A.; Radwan, K.H.; Nassar, A.E.; Mousa, K.H.; Hussein, A.; Mokhtar, M.M.; Abd El-Maksoud, M.M.; Istanbuli, T.; et al. Genome-wide identification, characterization, and validation of the bHLH transcription factors in grass pea. Front. Genet. 2023, 14, 1128992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Han, W.J.; Zhang, Q.; Suo, Y.J.; Li, H.W.; Diao, S.F.; Sun, P.; Huang, L.; Fu, J.M. Identification and expression analysis of the bHLH gene family members in Diospyros kaki. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chang, S.W.; Li, Q.; Huang, B.K.; Chen, W.S.; Tan, H.X. Genome-wide identification and characterisation of bHLH transcription factors in Artemisia annua. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, Z.; Fu, X.A.; Xu, H.; Zhang, Y.X.; Shi, Z.D.; Zhou, G.Z.; Bao, W.L. Comprehensive analysis of bHLH transcription factors in Ipomoea aquatica and its response to anthocyanin biosynthesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, W.W.; Tai, H.H.; Li, S.S.; Gao, W.; Zhao, M.; Xie, C.X.; Li, W.X. bHLH122 is important for drought and osmotic stress resistance in Arabidopsis and in the repression of ABA catabolism. New Phytol. 2014, 201, 1192–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zuo, Z.F.; Lee, H.Y.; Kang, H.G. Basic Helix-Loop-Helix transcription factors: Regulators for plant growth development and abiotic stress responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Makkena, S.; Lamb, R.S. The bHLH transcription factor SPATULA is a key regulator of organ size in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Signal. Behav. 2013, 8, e24140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Niu, N.; Liang, W.; Yang, X.; Jin, W.; Wilson, Z.A.; Hu, J.; Zhang, D. EAT1 promotes tapetal cell death by regulating aspartic proteases during male reproductive development in rice. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Le Hir, R.; Castelain, M.; Chakraborti, D.; Moritz, T.; Dinant, S.; Bellini, C. AtbHLH68 transcription factor contributes to the regulation of ABA homeostasis and drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol. Plant. 2017, 160, 312–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, W.S.; Zhu, J.; Lu, Y.T. Overexpression of AtbHLH112 suppresses lateral root emergence in Arabidopsis. Funct. Plant Biol. FPB 2014, 41, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sun, H.; Fan, H.J.; Ling, H.Q. Genome-wide identification and characterization of the bHLH gene family in tomato. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tan, C.; Qiao, H.L.; Ma, M.; Wang, X.; Tian, Y.Y.; Bai, S.; Hasi, A. Genome-wide identification and characterization of melon bHLH transcription factors in regulation of fruit development. Plants 2021, 10, 2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhao, M.R.; Li, J.; Zhu, L.; Chang, P.; Li, L.L.; Zhang, L.Y. Identification and characterization of MYB-bHLH-WD40 regulatory complex members controlling anthocyanidin biosynthesis in blueberry fruits development. Genes 2019, 10, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jiang, Y.; Yang, B.; Deyholos, M.K. Functional characterization of the Arabidopsis bHLH92 transcription factor in abiotic stress. Mol. Genet. Genom. MGG 2009, 282, 503–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gu, X.Y.; Gao, S.X.; Li, J.; Song, P.Y.; Zhang, Q.; Guo, J.f.; Wang, X.Y.; Han, X.Y.; Wang, X.J.; Zhu, Y.; et al. The bHLH transcription factor regulated gene OsWIH2 is a positive regulator of drought tolerance in rice. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 169, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, Q.; Fan, Z.H.; Qiu, L.N.; Che, Q.Q.; Wang, T.; Li, Y.Y.; Wang, Y.Z. MdbHLH130, an apple bHLH transcription factor, confers water stress resistance by regulating stomatal closure and ROS homeostasis in transgenic tobacco. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 543696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhao, Q.; Xiang, X.H.; Liu, D.; Yang, A.; Wang, Y.Y. Tobacco transcription factor NtbHLH123 confers tolerance to cold stress by regulating the NtCBF pathway and reactive oxygen species homeostasis. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, J.T.; Wang, L.N.; Zhu, W.; Wang, N.A.; Xin, H.P.; Li, S.H. Characterization of two VvICE1 genes isolated from ‘Muscat Hamburg’ grapevine and their effect on the tolerance to abiotic stresses. Sci. Hortic. 2014, 165, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sun, K.L.; Wang, H.Y.; Xia, Z.L. The maize bHLH transcription factor bHLH105 confers manganese tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Plant Sci. 2018, 280, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, L.; Ying, Y.H.; Narsai, R.; Ye, L.X.; Zheng, L.Q.; Tian, J.L.; Whelan, J.; Shou, H.X. Identification of OsbHLH133 as a regulator of iron distribution between roots and shoots in Oryza sativa. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36, 224–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Caili, F.; Huan, S.; Quanhong, L. A review on pharmacological activities and utilization technologies of pumpkin. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2006, 61, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guo, W.L.; Chen, B.H.; Guo, Y.Y.; Chen, X.J.; Li, Q.F.; Yang, H.L.; Li, X.Z.; Zhou, J.G.; Wang, G.Y. Expression of Pumpkin CmbHLH87 Gene Improves Powdery Mildew Resistance in Tobacco. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Poole, R.L. The TAIR database. Methods Mol. Biol. 2007, 406, 179–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zheng, Y.; Wu, S.; Bai, Y.; Sun, H.H.; Jiao, C.; Guo, S.G.; Zhao, K.; Blanca, J.; Zhang, Z.H.; Huang, S.W.; et al. Cucurbit Genomics Database (CuGenDB): A central portal for comparative and functional genomics of cucurbit crops. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D1128–D1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mistry, J.; Chuguransky, S.; Williams, L.; Qureshi, M.; Salazar, G.A.; Sonnhammer, E.L.L.; Tosatto, S.C.E.; Paladin, L.; Raj, S.; Richardson, L.J.; et al. Pfam: The protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 49, D412–D419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Marchler-Bauer, A.; Derbyshire, M.K.; Gonzales, N.R.; Lu, S.N.; Chitsaz, F.; Geer, L.Y.; Geer, R.C.; He, J.; Gwadz, M.; Hurwitz, D.I.; et al. CDD: NCBI’s conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D222–D226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gasteiger, E.; Gattiker, A.; Hoogland, C.; Ivanyi, I.; Appel, R.D.; Bairoch, A. ExPASy: The proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3784–3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chou, K.C.; Shen, H.B. Plant-mPLoc: A top-down strategy to augment the power for predicting plant protein subcellular localization. PLoS ONE 2017, 5, e11335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL): An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 127–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, C.J.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.H.; Xia, R. TBtools: An integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bailey, T.L.; Boden, M.; Buske, F.A.; Frith, M.; Grant, C.E.; Clementi, L.; Ren, J.Y.; Li, W.W.; Noble, W.S. MEME SUITE: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, W202–W208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ashburner, M.; Ball, C.A.; Blake, J.A.; Botstein, D.; Butler, H.; Cherry, J.M.; Davis, A.P.; Dolinski, K.; Dwight, S.S.; Eppig, J.T.; et al. Gene Ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lescot, M.; Déhais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Peer, Y.V.d.; Rouzé, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Szklarczyk, D.; Gable, A.L.; Nastou, K.C.; Lyon, D.; Kirsch, R.; Pyysalo, S.; Doncheva, N.T.; Legeay, M.; Fang, T.; Bork, P.; et al. The STRING database in 2021: Customizable protein-protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 49, D605–D612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-DDCt method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Qi, X.; Torii, K.U. Hormonal and environmental signals guiding stomatal development. BMC Biol. 2018, 16, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ito, S.; Song, Y.H.; Josephson-Day, A.R.; Miller, R.J.; Breton, G.; Olmstead, R.G.; Imaizumi, T. Flowering bHLH transcriptional activators control expression of the photoperiodic flowering regulator CONSTANS in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 3582–3587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Schuster, C.; Gaillochet, C.; Lohmann, J.U. Arabidopsis HECATE genes function in phytohormone control during gynoecium development. Development 2015, 142, 3343–3350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Yu, M.H.; Zhao, Z.Z.; He, J.X. Brassinosteroid signaling in plant–microbe interactions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 4091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wu, Y.Y.; Wu, S.H.; Wang, X.Q.; Mao, T.Y.; Bao, M.Z.; Zhang, J.W.; Zhang, J. Genome-wide identification and characterization of the bHLH gene family in an ornamental woody plant Prunus mume. Hortic. Plant J. 2022, 8, 531–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Baudry, A.; Heim, M.A.; Dubreucq, B.; Caboche, M.; Weisshaar, B.; Lepiniec, L. TT2, TT8, and TTG1 synergistically specify the expression of BANYULS and proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2004, 39, 366–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Naval, M.; Gil Muñoz, F.; Lloret, A.; Badenes, M.; Ríos, G. Molecular characterization of a TTG1-like gene expressed in persimmon fruit. Acta Hortic. 2017, 1172, 3359–3362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gao, F.; Robe, K.; Gaymard, F.; Izquierdo, E.; Dubos, C. The transcriptional control of iron homeostasis in plants: A tale of bHLH transcription factors? Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shupei, R.; Yuru, T.; Xinli, X.; Yue, L.; Jinhuan, C. Chromosome doubling mediates superior drought tolerance in Lycium ruthenicum via abscisic acid signaling. Hortic. Res. 2020, 7, 007. [Google Scholar]
  62. Hao, Y.Q.; Zong, X.M.; Ren, P.; Qian, Y.Q.; Fu, A.G. Basic Helix-Loop-Helix (bHLH) Transcription Factors Regulate a Wide Range of Functions in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Long, T.A.; Tsukagoshi, H.; Busch, W.; Lahner, B.; Salt, D.E.; Benfey, P.N. The bHLH transcription factor POPEYE regulates response to iron deficiency in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 2219–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Feng, Y.; Zeng, S.L.; Yan, J.P.; Li, K.Z.; Xu, H.N. Genome-wide analysis and expression of MYC family genes in tomato and the functional identification of slmyc1 in response to salt and drought stress. Agronomy 2023, 13, 757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kiribuchi, K.; Jikumaru, Y.; Kaku, H.; Minami, E.; Hasegawa, M.; Kodama, O.; Seto, H.; Okada, K.; Nojiri, H.; Yamane, H. Involvement of the Basic Helix-Loop-Helix transcription factor RERJ1 in wounding and drought stress responses in rice plants. J. Agric. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2005, 69, 1042–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Fan, M.; Bai, M.Y.; Kim, J.G.; Tina, W.; Eunkyoo, O.; Lawrence, C.; Ho, P.C.; Seung-Hyun, S.; Seong-Ki, K.; Beth, M.M.; et al. The bHLH transcription factor HBI1 mediates the trade-off between growth and pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 828–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Song, S.S.; Qi, T.C.; Fan, M.; Zhang, X.; Gao, H.; Huang, H.; Wu, D.W.; Guo, H.W.; Xie, D.X. The bHLH subgroup IIId factors negatively regulate jasmonate-mediated plant defense and development. PLoS Genetics 2017, 9, e1003653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Xu, J.H.; Xu, H.L.; Zhao, H.G.; Liu, H.; Xu, L.; Liang, Z.S. Genome-wide investigation of bHLH genes and expression analysis under salt and hormonal treatments in Andrographis paniculata. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 183, 114928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Goossens, J.; Mertens, J.; Goossens, A. Role and functioning of bHLH transcription factors in jasmonate signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 1333–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Song, M.Y.; Wang, H.M.; Wang, Z.; Huang, H.T.; Chen, S.W.; Ma, H.Q. Genome-wide characterization and analysis of bHLH transcription factors related to anthocyanin biosynthesis in Fig (Ficus carica L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 730692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Heim, M.A.; Jakoby, M.; Werber, M.; Martin, C.; Weisshaar, B.; Bailey, P.C. The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor family in plants: A genome-wide study of protein structure and functional diversity. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2003, 20, 735–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Li, J.; Wang, T.; Han, J.; Ren, Z.H. Genome-wide identification and characterization of cucumber bHLH family genes and the functional characterization of CsbHLH041 in NaCl and ABA tolerance in Arabidopsis and cucumber. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ni, L.J.; Wang, Z.Q.; Fu, Z.K.; Liu, D.N.; Yin, Y.L.; Li, H.G.; Gu, C.S. Genome-wide analysis of basic Helix-Loop-Helix family genes and expression analysis in response to drought and salt stresses in Hibiscus hamabo Sieb. et Zucc. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Zhan, H.; Liu, H.Z.; Ai, W.F.; Han, X.Y.; Wang, Y.; Lu, X.J. Genome-Wide identification and expression analysis of the bHLH transcription factor family and its response to abiotic stress in Mongolian Oak (Quercus mongolica). Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45, 1127–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Fan, Y.; Yang, H.; Lai, D.L.; He, A.L.; Xue, G.X.; Feng, L.; Chen, L.; Cheng, X.B.; Ruan, J.J.; Yan, J.; et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the bHLH transcription factor family and its response to abiotic stress in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, Z.; Jia, C.H.; Wang, J.Y.; Miao, H.X.; Liu, J.H.; Chen, C.; Yang, H.X.; Xu, B.Y.; Jin, Z.Q. Genome-wide analysis of basic Helix-Loop-Helix transcription factors to elucidate candidate genes related to fruit ripening and stress in banana (Musa acuminata L. AAA Group, cv. Cavendish). Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Fan, Y.; Lai, D.L.; Yang, H.; Xue, G.X.; He, A.L.; Chen, L.; Feng, L.; Ruan, J.J.; Xiang, D.B.; Yan, J.; et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the bHLH transcription factor family and its response to abiotic stress in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.). BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Horticulturae 09 00648 g001 550
Figure 1. Chromosomal localization of 222 CmobHLH genes.
Figure 1. Chromosomal localization of 222 CmobHLH genes.
Horticulturae 09 00648 g001
Horticulturae 09 00648 g002 550
Figure 2. The phylogenetic tree of pumpkin and Arabidopsis bHLH proteins. Cmo: pumpkin, At: Arabidopsis. The number 1–19 indicates the different subfamily.
Figure 2. The phylogenetic tree of pumpkin and Arabidopsis bHLH proteins. Cmo: pumpkin, At: Arabidopsis. The number 1–19 indicates the different subfamily.
Horticulturae 09 00648 g002
Horticulturae 09 00648 g003 550
Figure 3. Synteny analysis of pumpkin and Arabidopsis bHLH genes. Identified collinear genes are lined by red lines.
Figure 3. Synteny analysis of pumpkin and Arabidopsis bHLH genes. Identified collinear genes are lined by red lines.
Horticulturae 09 00648 g003
Horticulturae 09 00648 g004 550
Figure 4. Conserved motifs and gene structures of CmobHLH proteins. (A) Phylogenetic tree. Different number indicates the different subfamily. (B) Conserved motifs. (C) Gene structures.
Figure 4. Conserved motifs and gene structures of CmobHLH proteins. (A) Phylogenetic tree. Different number indicates the different subfamily. (B) Conserved motifs. (C) Gene structures.
Horticulturae 09 00648 g004
Horticulturae 09 00648 g005 550
Figure 5. Interaction networks of CmobHLH proteins.
Figure 5. Interaction networks of CmobHLH proteins.
Horticulturae 09 00648 g005
Horticulturae 09 00648 g006 550
Figure 6. Transcriptional levels of CmobHLH genes in the different tissues. I, higher expression abundance; II, lower expression abundance; III, almost no expression.
Figure 6. Transcriptional levels of CmobHLH genes in the different tissues. I, higher expression abundance; II, lower expression abundance; III, almost no expression.
Horticulturae 09 00648 g006
Horticulturae 09 00648 g007 550
Figure 7. Transcriptional profiles of CmobHLH genes under NaCl stress. The red color indicates higher expression; the blue color indicates lower expression.
Figure 7. Transcriptional profiles of CmobHLH genes under NaCl stress. The red color indicates higher expression; the blue color indicates lower expression.
Horticulturae 09 00648 g007
Horticulturae 09 00648 g008 550
Figure 8. Expression levels of CmobHLH genes in response to waterlogging, cold, ABA and drought stresses after 10 days. The error bars are denoted as the means ± SEs. Asterisks indicate significant differences at * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 and **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 8. Expression levels of CmobHLH genes in response to waterlogging, cold, ABA and drought stresses after 10 days. The error bars are denoted as the means ± SEs. Asterisks indicate significant differences at * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 and **** p < 0.0001.
Horticulturae 09 00648 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ao, W.; Luo, W.; Xu, W.; Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Sun, Y. Molecular Characterization and Expression of CmobHLH Genes in Pumpkin. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 648. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9060648

AMA Style

Ao W, Luo W, Xu W, Wang X, Liu J, Sun Y. Molecular Characterization and Expression of CmobHLH Genes in Pumpkin. Horticulturae. 2023; 9(6):648. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9060648

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ao, Wenhong, Weirong Luo, Wenchen Xu, Xudong Wang, Junjun Liu, and Yongdong Sun. 2023. "Molecular Characterization and Expression of CmobHLH Genes in Pumpkin" Horticulturae 9, no. 6: 648. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9060648

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop