Next Article in Journal
Assessing the Potential of Sentinel-2 Derived Vegetation Indices to Retrieve Phenological Stages of Mango in Ghana
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Seed and Fruit Characteristics of Lagenaria siceraria on Production and Quality of Grafted Watermelon
Previous Article in Journal
High NH4+/NO3 Ratio Inhibits the Growth and Nitrogen Uptake of Chinese Kale at the Late Growth Stage by Ammonia Toxicity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Morphological and Physio-Biochemical Responses of Watermelon Grafted onto Rootstocks of Wild Watermelon [Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad] and Commercial Interspecific Cucurbita Hybrid to Drought Stress
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Light Spectrum Variably Affects the Acclimatization of Grafted Watermelon Seedlings While Maintaining Fruit Quality

by
Filippos Bantis
1,*,
Christodoulos Dangitsis
2,
Anastasios S. Siomos
1 and
Athanasios Koukounaras
1
1
Department of Horticulture, Aristotle University, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Agris S.A., Kleidi, 59300 Imathia, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2022, 8(1), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8010010
Submission received: 29 November 2021 / Revised: 19 December 2021 / Accepted: 21 December 2021 / Published: 22 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Grafting to Improve Yield and Quality of Vegetable Crops)

Abstract

:
In many countries of Europe and Eastern Asia, watermelon production is mainly based on the use of grafted seedlings. Upon grafting, seedlings undergo a period of healing where artificial lighting is provided by light-emitting diodes in controlled chambers in order to accelerate and improve the healing process. The objective of our study was to test the effect of light quality on the final product (i.e., seedlings ready for transplanting) in the nursery, as well as to evaluate the possible implications on fruit quality after field cultivation. Narrow-band blue (B) and red (R) wavelengths, 64–36% R-B (36B), 76–24% R-B (24B), 88–12% R-B (12B), and 83–12% R-B plus 5% far-red (12B+FR) wavelengths were tested. 12B+FR enhanced the root dry weight, root architecture, and maximum photosynthetic rate, while RB combinations generally showed better root system development with increased blue portion. R light induced inferior root dry weight and quality indices (root/shoot and shoot–dry–weight/length ratios), lower gas exchange parameters, and chlorophyll content, but high shoot length and leaf area. B light led to inferior root architecture, lower stem diameter, leaf area, and maximum photosynthetic rate. Both R and B wavelengths showed decreased concentration of macronutrients and trace elements. After field cultivation, fruit quality (i.e., morphology and color), and valuable nutritive characteristics (i.e., phenolics, carotenoids, lycopene, antioxidants) maintained high quality irrespective of light treatments. Overall, 12B+FR performed well in almost all qualitative parameters including the morphology, the root development, and photosynthesis, while also maintaining high fruit quality.

1. Introduction

Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus), popular throughout the world, is a crop with economic and nutritional importance. The main regions of cultivation are located in Eastern Asia (China, South Korea, Japan), the Mediterranean (Greece, Spain, Italy, Turkey), and South America (Brazil) [1]. The watermelon crop is particularly valuable for Greece where the export value in 2020 reached 56 million euros, seventh among all countries in the world [2]. However, watermelon cultivation is subject to various abiotic (i.e., low or high temperatures, heavy metals, etc.) or biotic (i.e., soilborne pathogens, etc.) stresses. Such stress factors can be effectively fixed with vegetable grafting, a propagation technique where plants from different cultivars or even species are conjoined and form a seedling with desired traits [3,4]. Because of grafting, watermelon seedling production takes place in three stages: growth of to-be-grafted seedlings (scion and rootstock; stage I), wound healing upon grafting (stage II), and grafted seedling acclimatization (stage III).
The stage of acclimatization is important in order to develop seedlings with enhanced traits for successful field transplants. This stage is closely related to the second stage (wound healing) where histological modifications occur. Until recently, the healing stage was only performed in benches placed inside a greenhouse where environmental conditions were insufficiently controlled, and successful healing was achieved after a considerable amount of time. The production of grafted watermelon seedlings is intensified from December to April, thus, for a commercial nursery with limited amount of space the healing time is crucial. Reduced healing time leads to greater meeting of needs for high-quality seedlings from the growers. Currently, healing of grafted seedlings usually takes place in growth chambers that provide defined environments, due to the high sensitivity of the procedure.
Light is provided by artificial light sources such as light-emitting diodes (LEDs) that offer several benefits including optional light quality and intensity, low thermal emission, and long operating lifetime among others [5,6]. Healing and acclimatization are considered the most critical stages in order for a grafted seedling to survive and thrive [7]. Our recent study highlighted the importance of selecting the optimum light wavelength for the rapid and successful healing of grafted watermelon seedlings [8]. However, the stage of acclimatization of watermelon has not yet been examined. Upon acclimatization, seedlings are considered as a “final product” which are purchased by growers for field cultivation. For nurseries involved with watermelon seedlings, a critical aspect of their production apart from high seedling quality is the overall fruit quality that reaches the market and eventually the consumer’s plate [9]. However, the latter is highly dependable on growers’ practices and environmental conditions during cultivation, while the effect of lighting conditions during the seedling production, if any, is not known. Light quality is a factor that imposes morphogenetic responses to plants. In particular, red and blue wavelengths are the most influential for plant growth and development, while far-red has also been shown to affect photomorphogenetic properties along with red wavelength [6].
The objective of our study was to examine the effect of LEDs with varying spectral compositions employed during the healing stage of grafted watermelon seedlings, on seedling acclimatization, and on the final product (i.e., marketable seedlings) of the nursery. Moreover, this study focuses on the potential after-effect of LEDs with different spectral composition on fruit morphology and phytochemical composition in terms of altering or maintaining their quality.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Stage I Production

Seeds were provided by HM. Clause SA (Portes-Les-Valence, France). Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) hybrid Celine F1 was the scion segment, while interspecific squash (Cucurbita maxima × C. moschata) hybrid TZ-148 was the rootstock segment. Plug trays with 171 or 128 cells for scion and rootstock, respectively, were used. The substrate was 5:1:2 mixture of peat, perlite, and vermiculite. The seeds germinated after 72 (watermelon) or 48 h (squash) in a chamber with 95–98% relative humidity and 25 °C temperature. Upon germination, the seedlings to-be-grafted were grown in a plastic greenhouse for 10 days under 21.5 °C minimum temperature. Supplemental lighting (high-pressure sodium lamps, 18 h photoperiod, 100 ± 10 μmol m−2 s−1, MASTER GreenPower 600W 400V E40, Philips Lighting, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) was only applied for watermelon scion growth.

2.2. Grafting, Stage II Production, and Light Conditions

Grafting was executed using the splice grafting method, and the root system was removed at the same time, a technique which is often used during the grafting procedure of cucurbits. The grafted seedlings were immediately planted in plug trays with 72 cells and filled with peat, perlite, and vermiculite (3:1:1).
The grafted seedlings were subjected to a healing procedure for seven days inside a healing chamber (89–98% relative humidity, 25 °C temperature, recirculating air) including sole artificial lighting. For the latter, light sources were LEDs with different radiation spectra. Specifically, LEDs emitted narrow-band blue (B; peak wavelength at 450 nm), or red (R; peak wavelength at 661 nm), 36% blue and 88% red (36B), 24% blue and 88% red (24B), 12% blue and 88% red (12B), and 12% blue, 83% red, and 5% far-red (12B+FR; FR peak at 725 nm) with photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 85 ± 5 μmol m−2 s−1. Spectral distributions of the light treatments are presented in Table 1. All light treatments had a photoperiod of 18 h day/8 h night and were placed at 30 cm above the plants.

2.3. Grafted Seedlings’ Acclimatization in Stage III

Upon exiting the healing chamber, the trays containing seedlings were placed in a greenhouse for 7 days of acclimatization until they were considered commercial product. Minimum temperature was 21.5 °C, and HPS lamps were used for supplemental lighting (18 h day/8 h night photoperiod, PPFD of 100 ± 10 μmol m−2 s−1). For fertilization, permanent NPK (7:3:7) was included in the substrate along with Mg and trace elements (Osmocote Exact Mini, Geldermalsen, The Netherlands).

2.4. Determinations after Acclimatization

Upon visual examination by experienced personnel, it was determined that seedlings have reached the minimum marketable size after seven days of acclimatization in the greenhouse. At that time, 36 seedlings per treatment were sampled and evaluated as follows.
A digital caliper was used for shoot length and stem diameter determination. Dry weight of shoots and root systems were measured after 3 days at 72 °C. Moreover, two quality indices, the root-to-shoot ratio (R/S) and shoot dry weight-to-length ratio (DW/L), were also calculated from the values above. Leaf area was measured with LI-3000C (LI-COR biosciences, Lincoln, USA). Relative chlorophyll content was determined with a chlorophyll meter (CCM-200 plus, Opti-Sciences, Hudson, NH, USA). Parameters of the root architecture such as surface area, total length, tip number, and volume were measured in 5 seedlings per treatment with WinRHIZO Pro software (Regent Instruments Inc., Québec, QC, Canada). WinRHIZO software has been suggested [11] as a valuable tool for the detailed examination of the root system with view to understanding its manner of development. Maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry of dark-adapted leaves (Fv/Fm) was determined with a Pocket-PEA fluorometer (Pocket-PEA, Hansatech Instruments, Norflock, UK). Gas exchange parameters (stomatal conductance (gs), maximum photosynthetic rate (Pmax), and transpiration rate (E)) were measured with a Li-6400XT (LI-COR biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) set at a CO2 concentration of 400 ppm, temperature of 25 ± 1 °C, and 500 μmol m−2 s−1 PPFD. A CR-400 Chroma Meter (Konica Minolta Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was used for leaf color measurements.
After seven days in the greenhouse, 120 seedlings (3 replications × 40 seedlings) per light treatment were sampled, dried, and ground for nutrient content determination. Nitrogen was determined using the Kjeldahl method [12], by which samples were digested with H2SO4, distilled in boric acid (H3BO3), and titrated with hydrochloric acid (HCl). Phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, sodium, iron, zinc, manganese, and copper were extracted using HCl and determined by an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS, ICAP6300, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Boron was extracted using HCl and determined by a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia, MD, USA) at 414 nm.

2.5. Field Cultivation

Upon acclimatization, seedlings were transplanted and cultivated for over two months until fruit harvest. The cultivation was conducted in 2018 and 2019, in a commercial farm at Vathylakkos, Thessaloniki, Greece (N 40.761; E 22.724). Both cultivations showed similar conclusions; thus, data from 2019 are presented. Data from 2018 are also presented in Supplementary Table S1. Transplantation took place on May 5th, peak flowering was approximately on May 31st, and fruits were harvested on July 10th. The soil was prepared prior to transplantation with usual plowing, crumbling, dry poultry manure incorporation, and irrigation practices. The soil was characterized as sandy clay loam (SCL); moderate to heavy type with moderate pH, low CaCO3, moderate organic matter content, and low salinity. Irrigation, fertilization, and weed and pathogen control were conducted according to normal local practices.
Fifteen plants from every light treatment were transplanted. Plant distance between and within rows were 3 and 1 m, respectively. Plants were arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replicates. Specifically, plants were transplanted in three rows containing one group of plants from every light treatment, and each group consisted of 5 plants in a row.

2.6. Determinations after Field Cultivation

After field cultivation and harvest, a number of quality parameters were measured in order to examine the possible after-effect of light wavelengths imposed during the healing stage, and to determine the fruit status after cultivation in the field. After about 40 days from peak flowering, fully developed fruits free of defects or symptoms from the middle plant (third plant) from each row and treatment were harvested for morphological and quality determinations. Specifically, upon weighting in order to have similar size, fruits were cut longitudinally and length, width, as well as rind thickness were measured with a ruler. Colorimetric parameters were obtained from the fruit center. Total soluble solids (°Brix) were determined using a refractometer (PAL-α, Atago, Tokyo, Japan).
Total phenolic content and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) were determined in homogenized 5 g samples obtained from the whole fruit and extracted with 25 mL of 80% aqueous methanol. Total phenolic content was determined according to Singleton and Rossi [13], where 0.5 mL of methanolic plant extract, 2.5 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu’s reagent, and 2 mL of 7.5% sodium carbonate solution were incubated for 5 min at 50 °C. Absorbance of the colored product was measured at 760 nm (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia, MD, USA) versus a blank consisting of 0.5 mL of 80% aqueous methanol instead of methanolic plant extract. The results were expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalent per gram fresh weight.
FRAP was determined according to Benzie and Strain [14] where 0.1 mL of methanolic plant extract was added to 3 mL of working solution (CH3COONa buffer solution, pH 3.6; TPTZ and FeCl3) and incubated at 37 °C for exactly 4 min. Absorbance of the colored product was measured at 593 nm versus a blank consisted of 0.1 mL of 80% aqueous methanol. The results were expressed as μg of ascorbic acid equivalent per gram fresh weight.
Total carotenoid content and lycopene content were determined in homogenized 1-g samples obtained from the whole fruit and extracted with 25 mL of 80% aqueous ethanol. Absorbance of the colored product was measured at 445 and 503 nm versus a blank consisting of 80% aqueous ethanol. The results were expressed as μg of ascorbic acid equivalent per gram fresh weight.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS software (SPSS 23.0, IBM Corp.). Data were compared by one-way and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at significance level p = 0.05, while mean comparisons were conducted using Tukey test at α = 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Grafted Seedlings’ Acclimatization

Figure 1 depicts acclimated grafted watermelon seedlings treated with the six different wavelengths during healing. Red and blue wavelengths are known to drive photosynthesis in the most efficient manner, subsequently leading to greater biomass production and accumulation [15]. In our study, shoot dry weight was significantly greater in 24B compared to 12B (Figure 2A). 12B+FR induced greater root dry weight compared to the rest of the LEDs, while 36B and 24B had greater values compared to B, R, and 12B (Figure 2B). A healthy and vastly developed root system is critical for the rapid and efficient establishment of seedlings after transplantation. Total root system was significantly longer under 12B+FR, R, and 36B, compared to 12B (Figure 2C). The root surface area which is the area of roots in contact with the soil, as well as the number of tips, were also enhanced under 12B+FR compared to 12B and B (Figure 2D,E), while 12B+FR and R induced significantly greater root volume than B and 12B (Figure 2F). Overall, it is evident that narrow-band R wavelength and bichromatic treatments with relatively high blue amount (36B and 24B) or with additional FR wavelength (12B+FR) enhanced important parameters of the root system architecture leading to rapid lateral roots formation. Red and far-red wavelengths are known to be related with the root system development due to their involvement with auxin distribution from the apical bud to the roots [16]. In a study with artichoke, the authors reported longer root formation when seedlings were treated with red light compared to blue wavelength [17].
12B+FR also enhanced the R/S ratio compared to the other light treatments (Table 2). The increased R/S ratio is associated with better transplantation success due to the enhanced potential of a more expanded root system to absorb water and nutrients [18]. In addition, DW/L has been described as an essential quality parameter for seedlings of important vegetables such as tomato and grafted watermelon [1,19]. Higher values of the parameter are related to better quality; thus, it is a useful tool for fast and efficient seedling assessment before transplantation in the field. In this study, R led to significantly lower DW/L compared to the rest of the LEDs (Table 2) leading to the conclusion that narrow-band R is inefficient for the production of high-quality grafted watermelon seedlings.
Chlorophylls are probably the most important molecules related to plant life and development [20]. Chlorophylls a and b absorb light energy in the form of red and blue wavelengths, both of which are crucial for photosynthesis. In the present study, R led to significantly lower relative chlorophyll content than B and 36B (Table 2). Similar to our results, basil, pepper, spinach, and lettuce produced greater amounts of chlorophylls when treated with 91%/9% red/blue compared to narrow-band red light [21], proving the importance of blue light in chlorophyll regulation which is accomplished through the involvement of phot I and phot II phototropins [22].
Fv/Fm showed no differences among light treatments (Table 2), even though all means laid within the reported limits (0.78–0.86) for healthy seedlings with efficient photosynthetic apparatus [23]. This result proves that, among the tested light treatments, no damaging effect remains on seedlings until after the stage of acclimatization regardless of the light spectra imposed during the healing stage.
Color is usually a quality indicator in most agricultural products [24]. However, in our case, colorimetric parameters such as leaf lightness, chroma, and hue angle were not significantly affected by the different light treatments (Table 2). Initially, we expected a decrease in lightness under R treatment which also caused a significant drop in chlorophyll content. The two parameters are linearly related [25] but this was not evident in the grafted watermelon seedlings of our study.
After acclimatization, seedlings treated with R had a significantly greater shoot length compared to 36B and 12B (Figure 3A), while leaves were significantly more expanded in R, 36B, and 24B compared to B (Figure 3B). These two important quality indicators, shoot elongation and leaf expansion, are regulated by red and far-red wavelengths through phytochromes [26]; thus, they can be controlled depending on the provided light. This photoreceptor is related to shade avoidance responses as an answer to different red/far-red ratios of incident light. Similarly, Brassica microgreens (cabbage, mustard, arugula, and kale) formed larger leaves under narrow-band red than blue wavelength [27]. In a study with cucumber, red-blue treatments with decreasing blue portion led to longer shoots and more expanded leaves [28]. A valuable quality index of grafted watermelon seedlings, stem diameter, was significantly greater in 36B than B light treatment (Figure 3C). Similar to our results, Li et al. [29] reported greater stem diameter in tomato seedlings treated with narrow-band red or red-blue wavelengths compared to monochromatic blue light.
Pmax was enhanced under 12B+FR compared to the rest of the light treatments. Moreover, B showed the lowest values compared to 36B, 24B, and 12B (Figure 3D). Regarding gs and E, 12B had significantly greater values compared to 36B, 24B, and R (Figure 3E,F). Seedlings of another important cucurbit, cucumber, exhibited lower photosynthetic rate as well as indications of problematic photosynthetic apparatus under narrow-band red light [30]. In another study by our group, we found that Pmax, gs, and E of grafted watermelon seedlings immediately after exiting the healing chamber were inferior under R compared to bichromatic light treatments, especially 12B [31]. Narrow-bad red light triggers the activity of phytochromes, but not other photoreceptors [32], suggesting a reduced potential to develop an efficient photosynthetic apparatus under solo red light. However, the addition of blue light (i.e., multichromatic light spectra) is known to reduce these damaging effects [33]. Furthermore, Muneer et al. [34] reported that blue light enhances gs and E in plant leaves. Here, R had rather low gs values which led to lower E and subsequently reduced Pmax. However, Pmax is not always directly correlated to gs and E as shown by B and 12B in this study.
Plants require the essential nutrient elements (macronutrients and trace elements) for normal development and morphogenesis [35]. These elements are absorbed by the root system and traverse the plant matrix of apoplastic and symplastic pathways until reaching their destination, the leaves, flowers, fruits, etc. In general, plants require a sufficient supply of macronutrients and trace elements to thrive and achieve maximum productivity [36]. Their nutrient content can efficiently be controlled by growth conditions including light quality. At the end of acclimatization, total nitrogen (N) was significantly greater in B and R compared to 36B, phosphorus (P) was enhanced in 36B, 24B, and 12B compared to B, R, and 12B+FR, while potassium (K) was greater under 36B and 12B compared to B, R, and 12B+FR (Table 3). Calcium (Ca) was significantly greater in 36B and 12B than R, magnesium (Mg) was enhanced under 36B than B, while sodium (Na) was greater in 36B and 24B than R (Table 3). Boron (B) was not significantly affected by the light treatments, while manganese (Mn) was greater under 12B+FR compared to R (Table 3). Zinc (Zn) and iron (Fe) were significantly enhanced under 12B+FR compared to the rest of the LEDs, while copper (Cu) was greater in 12B compared to B, R, and 12B+FR (Table 3). Overall, narrow-band R and B wavelengths showed decreased concentration of essential macronutrients and trace elements compared to the rest of the multichromatic light treatments. Nevertheless, blue light has been shown to regulate processes such as proton pumping and membrane permeability which are involved with the accumulation of nutrients in broccoli sprouts [37]. In addition, Gerovac et al. [38], working with kohlrabi, mizuna, and mustard microgreens reported a tendency (often significant) for increased macronutrients or trace elements under 74%/18%/8% red/green/blue compared with 74/7/9% red/far-red/blue or 87/13% red/blue, respectively.

3.2. Field Cultivation

Fruits produced after field cultivation showed similar morphological, phytochemical, and colorimetric characteristics regardless of the light treatment that the seedlings were exposed to during healing. Specifically, morphological parameters such as fruit length, width, rind thickness, phytochemicals such as total soluble solids, total phenolic content, total carotenoid content, lycopene content, antioxidant capacity (displayed by FRAP), and colorimetric parameters such as lightness, chroma, and hue angle were not affected by the various light treatments during healing of the respective grafted watermelon seedlings (Table 4 for 2019 cultivation; Supplementary Table S1 for 2018 cultivation).
Lycopene is a valuable carotenoid with great health benefits for humans, having a positive role in prostate cancer [39]. Watermelon is one of the most important sources of lycopene for humans, along with tomato. In fact, watermelon lycopene has been found to have considerably higher antioxidant activity compared to tomato lycopene [40]. In our case, different light wavelengths did not influence the biosynthesis and accumulation of lycopene, thus maintaining fruit quality. It is not surprising that light treatments during the healing stage did not affect fruit quality since different wavelengths were only imposed for 7 days, almost three months before fruit harvesting. The conclusion drawn from this part of the experiment was that different light wavelengths during healing of grafted watermelon seedlings do not alter the fruit quality in terms of morphology, phytochemical content, or color.

4. Conclusions

Nurseries involved with the development of grafted watermelon seedlings mainly focus on the production of high-quality final product-seedlings with high transplantation success and rapid growth upon acclimatization in the nursery. In our study, 12B+FR enhanced the root system development (dry weight and root architecture) and the maximum photosynthetic rate. Red-blue combinations showed variable responses with generally better root system development with increasing blue portion. Seedlings treated with narrow-band R light showed inferior root dry weight, and subsequent R/S ratio and DW/L, considerably lower gas exchange parameters and chlorophyll content, but high shoot length and leaf area. Narrow-band B induced the formation of inferior root system displayed by root architecture analysis, and lower stem diameter, leaf area, and maximum photosynthetic rate. Both R and B wavelengths showed a decreased concentration of macronutrients and trace elements compared to the rest of the light treatments. Furthermore, nurseries are also concerned about the overall fruit quality that reaches the market and eventually the consumers’ plate. After field cultivation and fruit quality determination, it is concluded that different light wavelengths during the healing stage do not alter the morphology, phytochemical content, or color of fruits, thus maintaining their quality at high levels. Different light wavelengths were imposed only during healing of grafted seedlings, while fruits were harvested almost three months later. The differences observed after acclimatization were lost until harvest.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/horticulturae8010010/s1, Table S1: Morphological, phytochemical, and colorimetric parameters of ripe watermelon fruits after field cultivation in 2018. The transplanted grafted seedlings were treated with six different light treatments during the healing stage. TSS: total soluble solids; TPC: total phenolic content; TCC: total carotenoid content; LC: lycopene content; FRAP: ferric reducing antioxidant power. Color was measured in the center of the fruit. Mean values (±SE) within a parameter followed by different letters are significantly different (a < 0.05).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, and data analysis: F.B., A.K. and A.S.S.; experimental measurements: F.B. and C.D.; writing—original draft preparation: F.B. and A.K.; writing—review and editing: F.B., A.K, A.S.S. and C.D.; supervision and project administration: A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been co financed by the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH—CREATE—INNOVATE (project code: T1EDK-00960, LEDWAR.gr).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lee, J.-M.; Kubota, C.; Tsao, S.J.; Bie, Z.; Hoyos Echevarria, P.; Morra, L.; Odag, M. Current status of vegetable grafting: Diffusion, grafting techniques, automation. Sci. Hortic. 2010, 127, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2012 FAOSTAT Database. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat (accessed on 16 December 2021).
  3. Louws, F.J.; Rivard, C.L.; Kubota, C. Grafting fruiting vegetables to manage soilborne pathogens, foliar pathogens, arthropods and weeds. Sci. Hort. 2010, 127, 127–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Schwarz, D.; Rouphael, Y.; Colla, G.; Venema, J.H. Grafting as a tool to improve tolerance of vegetables to abiotic stresses: Thermal stress, water stress and organic pollutants. Sci. Hort. 2010, 127, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bourget, C.M. An introduction to light-emitting diodes. HortScience 2008, 43, 1944–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Bantis, F.; Smirnakou, S.; Ouzounis, T.; Koukounaras, A.; Ntagkas, N.; Radoglou, K. Current status and recent achievements in the field of horticulture with the use of light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Sci. Hortic. 2018, 235, 437–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lee, J.M.; Oda, M. Grafting of herbaceous vegetable and ornamental crops. In Horticultural Review; Janick, J., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2003; pp. 61–124. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bantis, F.; Panteris, E.; Dangitsis, C.; Carrera, E.; Koukounaras, A. Blue light promotes hormonal induced vascular reconnection, while red light boosts the physiological response and quality of grafted watermelon seedlings. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 21754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Miceli, A.; Sabatino, L.; Moncada, A.; Vetrano, F.; D’ Anna, F. Nursery and field evaluation of eggplant grafted onto unrooted cuttings of Solanum torvum Sw. Sci. Hortic. 2014, 178, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sager, J.C.; Smith, W.O.; Edwards, J.L.; Cyr, K.L. Photosynthetic Efficiency and Phytochrome Photoequilibria Determination Using Spectral Data. Trans. ASAE 1988, 31, 1882–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pang, W.; Crow, W.T.; Luc, J.E.; McSorley, R.; Giblin-Davis, R.M. Comparison of water displacement and WinRHIZO software for plant root parameter assessment. APS Publ. 2011, 95, 1308–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Saez-Plaza, P.; Navas, M.J.; Wybraniec, S.; Michalowski, T.; Asuero, A.G. An Overview of the Kjeldahl Method of Nitrogen Determination. Part II. Sample Preparation, Working Scale, Instrumental Finish, and Quality Control. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2013, 43, 224–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Singleton, V.L.; Rossi, J.A. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1965, 16, 144–158. [Google Scholar]
  14. Benzie, I.F.F.; Strain, J.J. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of ‘antioxidant power’: The FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 239, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. McCree, K.J. The action spectrum, absorptance and quantum yield of photosynthesis in crop plants. Agric. Metereol. 1972, 9, 191–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Salisbury, F.J.; Hall, A.; Grierson, C.S.; Halliday, K.J. Phytochrome coordinates Arabidopsis shoot and root development. Plant J. 2007, 50, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Rabara, R.C.; Behrman, G.; Timbol, T.; Rushton, P.J. Effect of spectral quality of monochromatic LED lights on the growth of artichoke seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Struve, D.K. Root Regeneration in Transplanted Deciduous Nursery Stock. HortScience 1990, 25, 266–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bantis, F.; Koukounaras, A.; Siomos, A.; Menexes, G.; Dangitsis, C.; Kintzonidis, D. Assessing quantitative criteria for characterization of quality categories for grafted watermelon seedlings. Horticulturae 2019, 5, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hortensteiner, S. Chlorophyll degradation during senescence. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 55–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Nanzin, M.T.; Lefsrud, M.; Gravel, V.; Azad, M.O.K. Blue light added with red LEDs enhance growth characteristics, pigments content, and antioxidant capacity in lettuce, spinach, kale, basil, and sweet pepper in a controlled environment. Plants 2019, 8, 93. [Google Scholar]
  22. Briggs, W.R.; Christie, J.M. Phototropins 1 and 2: Versatile plant blue-light receptors. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Björkman, O.; Demmig, B. Photon yield of O2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77 K among vascular plants of diverse origin. Planta 1987, 170, 489–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Barrett, D.M.; Beaulieu, J.C.; Shewfelt, R. Color, flavor, texture, and nutritional quality of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables: Desirable levels, instrumental and sensory measurement, and the effects of processing. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2010, 50, 369–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Madeira, A.C.; Ferreira, A.; De Varennes, A.; Vieira, M.I. SPAD meter versus tristimulus colorimeter to estimate chlorophyll content and leaf color in sweet pepper. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2003, 34, 2461–2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Casal, J.J. Photoreceptor signaling networks in plant responses to shade. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64, 403–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kyriacou, M.C.; Rouphael, Y.; Di Gioia, F.; Kyratzis, A.; Serio, F.; Renna, M.; De Pascale, S.; Santamaria, P. Micro-scale vegetable production and the rise of microgreens. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 57, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hernandez, R.; Kubota, C. Physiological responses of cucumber seedlings under different blue and red photon flux ratios using LEDs. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 121, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, Y.; Xin, G.; Wei, M.; Shi, Q.; Yang, F.; Wang, X. Carbohydrate accumulation and sucrose metabolism responses in tomato seedling leaves when subjected to different light qualities. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 225, 490–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hogewoning, S.W.; Trouwborst, G.; Maljaars, H.; Poorter, H.; van Leperen, W.; Harbinson, J. Blue light dose-responses of leaf photosynthesis, morphology, and chemical composition of Cucumis sativus grown under different combinations of red and blue light. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 3107–3117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bantis, F.; Koukounaras, A.; Siomos, A.S.; Fotelli, M.N.; Kintzonidis, D. Bichromatic red and blue LEDs during healing enhance the vegetative growth and quality of grafted watermelon seedlings. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 261, 109000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Whitelam, G.; Halliday, K. Light and Plant Development; Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  33. Miao, Y.-X.; Wang, X.-Z.; Gao, L.-H.; Chen, Q.-Y.; Qu, M. Blue light is more essential than red light for maintaining the activities of photosystem II and I and photosynthetic electron transport capacity in cucumber leaves. J. Integrat. Agric. 2016, 15, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Muneer, S.; Kim, E.J.; Park, J.S. Influence of green, red and blue light emitting diodes on multiprotein complex proteins and photosynthetic activity under different light intensities in lettuce leaves (Lactuca sativa L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 4657–4670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Mengel, K.; Kirkby, E.A.; Kosegarten, H.; Appel, T. Principles of Plant Nutrition; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  36. White, P.J.; Brown, P.H. Plant nutrition for sustainable development and global health. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105, 1073–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Kopsell, D.A.; Sams, C.E.; Barickman, T.C.; Morrow, R.C. Sprouting broccoli accumulate higher concentrations of nutritionally important metabolites under narrow-band light emitting diode lighting. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 2014, 139, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gerovac, J.R.; Craver, J.K.; Boldt, J.K.; Lopez, R.G. Light intensity and quality from sole-source light-emitting diodes impact growth, morphology, and nutrient content of Brassica microgreens. HortScience 2016, 51, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Barber, N.J.; Barber, J. Lycopene and prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostate Dis. 2002, 5, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kim, C.-H.; Park, M.-K.; Kim, S.-K.; Cho, Y.-H. Antioxidant capacity and anti-inflammatory activity of lycopene in watermelon. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 49, 2083–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Grafted watermelon seedlings after healing in a chamber under six different light treatments for 7 days, and after acclimatization in a greenhouse for 7 days. B: narrow-band blue; 36B: 36% blue and 64% red; 24B: 24% blue and 76% red; 12B: 12% blue and 88% red; 12B+FR: 12% blue, 83% red, and 5% far-red; R: narrow-band red.
Figure 1. Grafted watermelon seedlings after healing in a chamber under six different light treatments for 7 days, and after acclimatization in a greenhouse for 7 days. B: narrow-band blue; 36B: 36% blue and 64% red; 24B: 24% blue and 76% red; 12B: 12% blue and 88% red; 12B+FR: 12% blue, 83% red, and 5% far-red; R: narrow-band red.
Horticulturae 08 00010 g001
Figure 2. (A) Shoot dry weight, (B) root dry weight, and root architecture parameters such as (C) total root length, (D) root surface area, (E) tip number, and (F) root volume of grafted watermelon seedlings treated for seven days in a healing chamber with six light treatments, plus seven days in a greenhouse. Mean values (±SE) within a row followed by different letters are significantly different (a < 0.05).
Figure 2. (A) Shoot dry weight, (B) root dry weight, and root architecture parameters such as (C) total root length, (D) root surface area, (E) tip number, and (F) root volume of grafted watermelon seedlings treated for seven days in a healing chamber with six light treatments, plus seven days in a greenhouse. Mean values (±SE) within a row followed by different letters are significantly different (a < 0.05).
Horticulturae 08 00010 g002aHorticulturae 08 00010 g002b
Figure 3. (A) Shoot length, (B) leaf area, (C) stem diameter, and gas exchange parameters such as (D) maximum photosynthetic rate, (E) stomatal conductance, and (F) transpiration rate of grafted watermelon seedlings treated for seven days in a healing chamber with six light treatments, plus seven days in a greenhouse. Pmax: maximum photosynthetic rate; gs: stomatal conductance; E: transpiration rate. Mean values (±SE) within a row followed by different letters are significantly different (a < 0.05).
Figure 3. (A) Shoot length, (B) leaf area, (C) stem diameter, and gas exchange parameters such as (D) maximum photosynthetic rate, (E) stomatal conductance, and (F) transpiration rate of grafted watermelon seedlings treated for seven days in a healing chamber with six light treatments, plus seven days in a greenhouse. Pmax: maximum photosynthetic rate; gs: stomatal conductance; E: transpiration rate. Mean values (±SE) within a row followed by different letters are significantly different (a < 0.05).
Horticulturae 08 00010 g003aHorticulturae 08 00010 g003b
Table 1. Wavelength distribution and important photobiological parameters of the light treatments tested. YPFD: yield photon flux density; PPS: phytochrome photostationary state. YPFD and PPS values were calculated according to Sager et al. [10].
Table 1. Wavelength distribution and important photobiological parameters of the light treatments tested. YPFD: yield photon flux density; PPS: phytochrome photostationary state. YPFD and PPS values were calculated according to Sager et al. [10].
WavebandLight Treatment
B36B24B12B12B+FRR
UV %; 380–399 nm000000
Blue %; 400–499 nm100362412120
Green %; 500–599 nm000000
Red %; 600–699 nm064768883100
Far-red %; 700–780 nm000050
YPFD (μmol m−2 s−1)63.873.575.477.273.979.1
PPS0.510.880.890.890.880.89
Table 2. Developmental, physiological, and colorimetric parameters of grafted watermelon seedlings treated for seven days in a healing chamber with six light treatments, plus seven days in a greenhouse. R/S: root-to-shoot ratio; DW/L: shoot dry weight-to-length ratio; chl: chlorophyll; Fv/Fm: maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry of a dark-adapted leaf. Mean values (±SE) within a parameter followed by different letters are significantly different (a < 0.05).
Table 2. Developmental, physiological, and colorimetric parameters of grafted watermelon seedlings treated for seven days in a healing chamber with six light treatments, plus seven days in a greenhouse. R/S: root-to-shoot ratio; DW/L: shoot dry weight-to-length ratio; chl: chlorophyll; Fv/Fm: maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry of a dark-adapted leaf. Mean values (±SE) within a parameter followed by different letters are significantly different (a < 0.05).
ParametersLight Treatments
B36B24B12B12B+FRR
R/S ratio0.15 ± 0.01c0.17 ± 0.01b0.17 ± 0.01b0.16 ± 0.01bc0.21 ± 0.01a0.13 ± 0.01d
(DW/L) *10004.80 ± 0.14a5.01 ± 0.13a4.86 ± 0.10a4.93 ± 0.12a4.78 ± 0.12a4.55 ± 0.14b
Chl. content32.45 ± 1.22a31.09 ± 1.09a29.18 ± 1.31ab29.16 ± 1.18ab28.07 ± 1.24ab26.16 ± 1.01b
Fv/Fm0.822 ± 0.002a0.823 ± 0.002a0.823 ± 0.002a0.825 ± 0.002a0.823 ± 0.002a0.822 ± 0.003a
Lightness40.33 ± 0.34a40.40 ± 0.43a39.72 ± 0.28a39.43 ± 0.31a40.53 ± 0.34a40.31 ± 0.27a
Chroma21.94 ± 0.39a23.75 ± 0.59a23.25 ± 0.43a23.41 ± 0.44a23.88 ± 0.57a23.37 ± 0.36a
Hue angle129.58 ± 0.23a129.18 ± 0.32a129.26 ± 0.21a129.31 ± 0.22a129.18 ± 0.30a128.85 ± 0.19a
Table 3. Nutrient content of grafted watermelon seedlings treated for seven days in the healing chamber with six light treatments, plus seven days in the greenhouse. Mean values (±SE) within a nutrient followed by different letters are significantly different (a < 0.05).
Table 3. Nutrient content of grafted watermelon seedlings treated for seven days in the healing chamber with six light treatments, plus seven days in the greenhouse. Mean values (±SE) within a nutrient followed by different letters are significantly different (a < 0.05).
ParametersLight Treatments
B36B24B12B12B+FRR
Total N %3.56 ± 0.24a3.12 ± 0.05b3.33 ± 0.03ab3.28 ± 0.10ab3.39 ± 0.01ab3.55 ± 0.12a
P %2.45 ± 0.04b2.84 ± 0.04a2.82 ± 0.03a2.83 ± 0.06a2.59 ± 0.06b2.48 ± 0.14b
K %5.29 ± 0.10bc5.80 ± 0.15a5.64 ± 0.13ab5.87 ± 0.04a5.32 ± 0.12bc4.96 ± 0.25c
Ca %2.72 ± 0.02ab2.84 ± 0.12a2.65 ± 0.09ab2.83 ± 0.10a2.77 ± 0.08ab2.50 ± 0.11b
Mg %0.95 ± 0.02b1.12 ± 0.08a1.01 ± 0.06ab1.01 ± 0.05ab1.03 ± 0.02ab1.00 ± 0.01ab
Na %0.05 ± 0.01ab0.06 ± 0.01a0.06 ± 0.01a0.06 ± 0.01ab0.05 ± 0.01ab0.05 ± 0.01b
B ppm51.86 ± 1.44a53.44 ± 1.45a53.59 ± 1.78a52.88 ± 0.92a51.77 ± 1.24a51.01 ± 1.11a
Mn ppm46.47 ± 1.17ab47.90 ± 2.62ab48.11 ± 2.10ab47.63 ± 2.18ab50.94 ± 2.57a44.50 ± 1.17b
Zn ppm74.74 ± 1.50c78.93 ± 2.16bc80.18 ± 0.63bc81.39 ± 1.00b89.99 ± 0.36a80.68 ± 3.47b
Fe ppm108.63 ± 1.41c115.37 ± 1.01b114.63 ± 1.44b115.47 ± 2.16b120.60 ± 1.81a109.43 ± 1.28c
Cu ppm15.45 ± 0.75c17.00 ± 0.51abc17.38 ± 0.23ab17.44 ± 0.44a15.73 ± 0.38bc15.28 ± 0.81c
Table 4. Morphological, phytochemical, and colorimetric parameters of ripe watermelon fruits after field cultivation in 2019. The transplanted grafted seedlings were treated with six different light treatments during the healing stage. TSS: total soluble solids; TPC: total phenolic content; TCC: total carotenoid content; LC: lycopene content; FRAP: ferric reducing antioxidant power. Color was measured in the center of the fruit. Mean values (±SE) within a parameter followed by different letters are significantly different (a < 0.05).
Table 4. Morphological, phytochemical, and colorimetric parameters of ripe watermelon fruits after field cultivation in 2019. The transplanted grafted seedlings were treated with six different light treatments during the healing stage. TSS: total soluble solids; TPC: total phenolic content; TCC: total carotenoid content; LC: lycopene content; FRAP: ferric reducing antioxidant power. Color was measured in the center of the fruit. Mean values (±SE) within a parameter followed by different letters are significantly different (a < 0.05).
ParametersLight Treatments
B36B24B12B12B+FRR
Length (cm)29.63 ± 2.51a32.00 ± 1.61a31.97 ± 1.73a30.97 ± 2.29a33.30 ± 0.85a31.83 ± 0.68a
Width (cm)21.33 ± 1.17a22.17 ± 0.34a21.77 ± 0.90a22.13 ± 0.66a23.37 ± 0.13a22.43 ± 0.23a
Rind thick. (cm)1.82 ± 0.12a1.58 ± 0.12a1.85 ± 0.21a1.78 ± 0.13a1.85 ± 0.07a1.65 ± 0.17a
TSS (°Brix)10.73 ± 1.07a10.17 ± 0.57a10.07 ± 0.20a10.03 ± 0.24a10.80 ± 0.44a9.93 ± 0.28a
TPC (mg/g)0.13 ± 0.01a0.14 ± 0.02a0.12 ± 0.01a0.14 ± 0.01a0.14 ± 0.01a0.15 ± 0.02a
TCC (μg/g)35.09 ± 1.44a36.67 ± 5.23a36.79 ± 1.83a42.63 ± 5.22a42.42 ± 2.52a45.89 ± 8.56a
LC (μg/g)33.81 ± 1.45a35.31 ± 5.15a35.60 ± 1.87a41.15 ± 4.99a40.92 ± 2.14a44.06 ± 7.98a
FRAP (μg/g)35.52 ± 3.20a38.82 ± 6.20a35.18 ± 2.59a37.04 ± 4.22a40.36 ± 0.93a35.63 ± 2.79a
Lightness40.84 ± 2.67a40.76 ± 2.49a41.55 ± 0.43a41.03 ± 3.10a39.10 ± 3.47a42.00 ± 1.12a
Chroma27.48 ± 0.18a30.25 ± 0.51a30.90 ± 1.32a31.46 ± 1.26a33.46 ± 1.64a31.02 ± 3.16a
Hue angle34.82 ± 1.51a33.00 ± 1.29a33.22 ± 0.12a32.73 ± 1.17a32.84 ± 0.42a33.51 ± 0.92a
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bantis, F.; Dangitsis, C.; Siomos, A.S.; Koukounaras, A. Light Spectrum Variably Affects the Acclimatization of Grafted Watermelon Seedlings While Maintaining Fruit Quality. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8010010

AMA Style

Bantis F, Dangitsis C, Siomos AS, Koukounaras A. Light Spectrum Variably Affects the Acclimatization of Grafted Watermelon Seedlings While Maintaining Fruit Quality. Horticulturae. 2022; 8(1):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8010010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bantis, Filippos, Christodoulos Dangitsis, Anastasios S. Siomos, and Athanasios Koukounaras. 2022. "Light Spectrum Variably Affects the Acclimatization of Grafted Watermelon Seedlings While Maintaining Fruit Quality" Horticulturae 8, no. 1: 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8010010

APA Style

Bantis, F., Dangitsis, C., Siomos, A. S., & Koukounaras, A. (2022). Light Spectrum Variably Affects the Acclimatization of Grafted Watermelon Seedlings While Maintaining Fruit Quality. Horticulturae, 8(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8010010

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop