Post-Harvest Non-Conventional and Traditional Methods to Control Cadophora luteo-olivacea: Skin Pitting Agent of Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa (A. Chev.)

Di Francesco, Alessandra; Di Foggia, Michele; Vittoria, Alessio; Baraldi, Elena

doi:10.3390/horticulturae7070169

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Post-Harvest Non-Conventional and Traditional Methods to Control Cadophora luteo-olivacea: Skin Pitting Agent of Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa (A. Chev.)

¹

Distal—Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale G. Fanin, 44, 40127 Bologna, Italy

²

Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Belmeloro, 8/2, 40126 Bologna, Italy

^*

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Horticulturae 2021, 7(7), 169; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7070169

Submission received: 3 June 2021 / Revised: 26 June 2021 / Accepted: 28 June 2021 / Published: 1 July 2021

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biological Control of Pre- and Postharvest Fungal Diseases)

Download

Browse Figures

Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Cadophora luteo-olivacea represents a critical problem for kiwifruit in the post-harvest phase, mainly for its little note epidemiology. The study presented some results about the possibility of preserving kiwifruit from skin pitting symptoms using alternative methods to fungicides. By in vitro assays, antagonist mechanisms of action against pathogen isolates were tested. Trichoderma harzianum (Th1) showed the highest inhibitory activity against C. luteo-olivacea isolates by volatile, non-volatile, and by dual culture assay, displaying an inhibition respectively by 90%, 70.6%, and 78.8%, and with respect to Aureobasidium pullulans (L1 and L8) by 23.3% and 25.8%, 50% and 34.7%, and 22.5% and 23.6%, respectively. Further, the sensitivity on CFU and mycelial growth of C. luteo-olivacea isolates to fludioxonil, and CaCl₂ was tested, displaying interesting EC50 values (0.36 and 0.92 g L⁻¹, 22.5 g L⁻¹, respectively). The effect of Brassica nigra defatted meal was tested as biofumigation assays and through FT-IR (Fourier-Transform Infrared) spectroscopy. The above-mentioned treatments were applied in vivo to evaluate their efficacy on kiwifruits. Our data demonstrated that alternative solutions could be considered to control postharvest pathogens such as C. luteo-olivacea.

Keywords:

yeasts; kiwifruit; VOCs; fungicides; Trichoderma

1. Introduction

Cadophora luteo-olivacea is a fungus mainly associated with decay symptoms in vines as a vascular pathogen and in kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa (A. Chev) cv. Hayward) as a rotting fruit agent [1]. Khol et al. [2] described C. luteo-olivacea as a pathogen able to infect developing fruits during the growing season, remaining quiescent and then appearing during the post-harvest phase in cold storage. However, its incidence can vary over time and is strictly connected to field conditions [3]. Even if Botrytis cinerea represents the most critical post-harvest pathogen of kiwifruit [4], skin pitting symptoms after different storage months (on average 4) in most Italian packaging houses were detected.

Kiwifruit cv. Hayward can be stored for 3–6 months at −1 °C in normal refrigeration (NR) or in a controlled atmosphere (CA) (2% O₂; 4.5% CO₂). Nevertheless, CA conditions seem to stimulate gray mold development and less stimulate biocontrol antagonists’ mechanisms of action, as reported by Di Francesco et al. [5]. In this context, biocontrol agents (BCAs) and natural substances represented non-conventional methods to control post-harvest fungal diseases.

Among the various alternative approaches, biological control utilizing antagonistic microorganisms has been shown to effectively manage different post-harvest diseases of kiwifruit [5,6,7]. Along with antagonistic microorganisms, A. pullulans was often tested in the postharvest phase to control different fungal pathogens and also against the gray mold of kiwifruit [5], showing good efficacy. Even in the case of T. harzianum, the BCA is often recognized due to its effectiveness in controlling several pathogens in diverse fruits, including kiwifruit [8]. The efficacy of both BCAs is always related to several mechanisms of action reported like competition, antibiosis, parasitism (involving lytic enzymes), and the induction of plant defenses.

However, in recent years, the interest in natural substances (essential oils, aromatic compounds, and hydrolytic reaction products) has increased, and numerous studies on their biocidal activity have been conducted. Among these, several compounds can be artificially added by fumigation in cold storage, such as glucosinolates, a large class of approximately 100 compounds produced by Cruciferae [9]. The antifungal activity of allylisothiocyanate (AITC), a naturally occurring flavor compound in mustard and horseradish, successfully demonstrated its efficiency on different fruit species [10,11,12]. AITC is ‘generally recognized as safe’ (GRAS) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States since 2006, authorized as a natural food preservative in Japan, and evaluated as a safe additive by EFSA (European Food Safety Authority, 2010). Nevertheless, fruit fungicides dipping is still used for post-harvest applications [13], especially fludioxonil, registered for post-harvest applications against fungal diseases. Generally, fludioxonil is considered a fungicide with low toxicity and a broad spectrum, but it remains unclear whether its residues in food have potential harm to humans.

In addition, it is well known that some inorganic salts as CaCl₂ (calcium chloride) can increase the storage quality of many fruits [11], probably determining a higher resistance to fungal pathogens attack. In fact, calcium alters intracellular and extracellular processes, which retard ripening [13] but at high concentration could cause severe pitting on fruits [11].

To the best of our knowledge, not so many studies have been conducted to explore the efficacy of utilizing BCAs and natural substances to control C. luteo-olivacea of kiwifruit [14].

This study’s objective was to evaluate traditional (fungicides) and unconventional (BCAs, GRAS) treatments efficacy to control skin pitting symptoms of kiwifruit through in vitro and in vivo assays. Different strategies have been adopted: (a) testing the efficacy of Aureobasidium pullulans and Trichoderma harzianum strains by dual culture, VOCs, and N-VOCs assays; (b) evaluating the EC50 values of CaCl₂ and fludioxonil (Scholar) against C. luteo-olivacea CFU and mycelial growth (c) and the effect of AITC on fungal isolates growth. (d) The same above-mentioned treatments were tested on kiwifruits to verify their effectiveness; (e) the effect of AITC biofumigation on kiwifruit was biochemically evaluated through FT-IR (Fourier-Transform Infrared) spectroscopy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fruit

Hayward kiwifruits (Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa (A. Chev.), C.F. Liang & A.R. Ferguson) obtained from an orchard located in Faenza (Italy) were used. Fruits harvested at the time of collection (6.5° Brix) were picked from trees. Fruits were stored at 0 °C, and immediately before the experiment were wounded with a sterile nail (3 × 3 × 3 mm).

2.2. Biocontrol Agents and Pathogens

Aureobasidium pullulans strains L1 and L8 were molecularly characterized by Di Francesco et al. [15] and maintained on nutrient yeast dextrose agar (NYDA: 8 g of nutrient broth, 5 g of yeast extract, 10 g of dextrose, and 15 g of agar in 1 L of distilled water) at 4 °C until use [16]. Two days before trials, each antagonist was grown on NYDA at 25 °C, and the yeast cells were collected in sterile distilled water containing 0.05% (v/v) Tween 80 and quantified for a final concentration of 10⁸ cells mL⁻¹ by counting spore suspension on a hemocytometer cell. Trichoderma harzianum (Th1) isolate derived from Criof fungal collection was maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA, 39 g in 1 L of distilled water) (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) at 4 °C until use. Four days before trials, the fungal isolate was grown on new PDA at 20 °C, and conidia were collected in sterile distilled water containing 0.05% (v/v) Tween 80 and quantified for a final concentration of 10⁵ conidia mL⁻¹, as above reported. Cadophora luteo-olivacea isolates (CadA, CadB, CadC) belonged to Criof fungal collection. Each isolate was grown on PDA and incubated at 20 °C. Conidial suspensions were prepared from 20-days-old colonies by scraping and suspending conidia in sterile distilled water with 0.05% (v/v) Tween 80 and adjusted to the final concentration required (10⁵ conidia mL⁻¹) with a hemocytometer.

2.3. Chemical and Natural Substances

Regarding the chemical fungicide, Scholar^® (fludioxonil) (Syngenta, Basil, Switzerland), registered for post-harvest applications against diseases of fruits in different European countries, was tested at different concentrations (0.001, 0.025, 0.05, 0.10, 0.17, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 g L⁻¹) by in vitro (amended medium) and in vivo (dipping) assays. CaCl₂ (Sigma Aldrich) was used at different concentrations (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 g L⁻¹) for the in vitro (amended medium) and in vivo (dipping) experiments. Brassica nigra defatted meals were prepared by shaking ground seeds (Jungepflanzen, Forchheim, Germany) with hexane (1:10, w/v) overnight. After filtration through filter paper, the residual solvent was removed under vacuum. The ground seeds meal was mixed with sterile distilled water at a rate of 3:1 (w/v) (grams) before each treatment.

2.4. In Vitro Assays with Antagonists

In the co-culturing assay, C. luteo-olivacea isolates CadA, CadB, CadC were separately co-cultured with L1 and L8 yeast strains, and Th1 on PDA (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) plates. In each plate, a mycelial plug (6 mm in diameter) of C. luteo-olivacea isolates CadA, CadB, CadC derived from a 20-days-old colony was inoculated 30 mm from the plate edge, and A. pullulans cells, from a 48-hour-old colony grown on NYDA and a mycelial plug (6 mm in diameter) of Th1 from 7-days-old colony grown on PDA, were respectively streaked by a sterile loop and positioned 30 mm from the fungal plug [15]. In control plates, only C. luteo-olivacea isolates CadA, CadB, CadC plugs were inoculated. Plates were incubated at 20 °C in the dark for 15 days; the fungal colony’s radius was measured on a line from the plug’s center to the yeast swipe.

For the N-VOCs assay, cells (100 μL; 10⁸ cells mL⁻¹) of each Aureobasidium strain and conidia suspensions (100 μL; 10⁵ conidia mL⁻¹) obtained respectively from 2-days-old colonies grown on NYDA and 5-days-old colonies grown on PDA were spread on sterile cellophane layer (Safta, Piacenza, Italy) previously positioned on PDA plates. In control plates, 100 μL of sterile distilled water (SDW) were used.

After 48 h of incubation at 25 °C and 20 °C, respectively, cellophane was removed, and a mycelial plug (6 mm diameter) of each C. luteo-olivacea isolate (CadA, CadB, CadC) was inoculated in the center of the plate. Plates were incubated at 20 °C, and the colony diameter was measured after 15 days from the inoculation. The VOCs produced by L1, L8, and Th1 strains were tested against the mycelial growth of C. luteo-olivacea isolates. For this purpose, NYDA and PDA plates were respectively inoculated spreading 100 μL of L1 and L8 cells suspension (10⁸ cells mL⁻¹) and 100 μL of Th1 conidia suspension (10⁵ cells mL⁻¹). The plate’s lid was replaced, after 48 h of incubation at 25 °C and 20 °C, by a base plate of PDA inoculated with a mycelial plug (6 mm diameter) of each pathogen. The two base plates were sealed immediately with a double layer of parafilm and incubated at 20 °C for 7 days. In all experiments, five plates (replicates) were used for each combination and the controls. The experiments were conducted twice.

2.5. In Vitro Assays: Amended Medium and Brassica nigra Defatted Meal Biofumigation

To determine the sensitivity of CFU and mycelial growth of C. luteo-olivacea isolates to fludioxonil and CaCl₂, PDA was autoclaved, and the products incorporated after cooling (50 °C) at final concentrations of 0.001, 0.025, 0.05, 0.10, 0.17, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 g L⁻¹ and 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8 g L⁻¹, respectively. A mycelium plug (6 mm in diameter) and conidial suspensions (10³ conidia mL⁻¹; 100 µL), derived from 15-days-old actively growing colonies on PDA of each C. luteo-olivacea isolate, were transferred to each amended PDA dish and incubated at 20 °C for 15 days. Five replicates (plates) were used for each isolate at different product concentrations. No amended PDA plates were inoculated with each isolate and used as a control. The experiment was performed twice. EC50 values were calculated as the concentration (g L⁻¹) that inhibits mycelial and CFU growth by 50% compared with the control.

For the biofumigation assay, Petri dishes (90 mm diameter) with two compartments were used. One compartment was filled with 10 mL of PDA, suddenly inoculated by C. luteo-olivacea isolates mycelial plugs (6 mm diameter), and in the other plate compartment, 3 g of B. nigra defatted meal soaked with 9 mL of SDW were inserted. The plates were sealed immediately with a double layer of parafilm and incubated at 20 °C for two weeks. Plates without B. nigra meal were considered as control. Five replicates (plates) were used for each isolate, and the experiment was performed twice.

2.6. In Vivo Assays

In vivo assays were conducted testing all the above-cited in vitro treatments: L1 and L8 yeast strains, Th1 isolate, CaCl₂, fludioxonil, and B. nigra defatted meal. For the BCAs assay, kiwifruits were wounded by a sterile nail (3 × 3 × 3 mm) at the equator (one wound per fruit) and then inoculated with 20 μL of each isolate BCAs suspension (10⁸ cells mL⁻¹ and 10⁵ conidia mL⁻¹, respectively for L1, L8, and Th1). After one hour from BCAs inoculation, 20 μL of CadA, CadB, CadC conidia suspension (10⁵ conidia mL⁻¹) were inoculated.

Regarding the treatments with fludioxonil and CaCl₂, kiwifruits were dipped in solutions concentrated 1 g L⁻¹ and 0.8 g L⁻¹, respectively, for each product.

The fruits were dried at room temperature and suddenly artificially inoculated with pathogen conidial suspension, as above described. About the kiwifruit biofumigation with B. nigra defatted meal, 10 g of meal soaked with 30 mL of SDW were placed inside a storage cabinet (0.1 m³) together with fruits for 24 h at 0 °C. Biofumigated kiwifruits were artificially inoculated with 20 μL of CadA, CadB, CadC conidia suspensions (10⁵ conidia mL⁻¹).

Kiwifruits were stored at 0 °C for five months and then at 20 °C for another seven days (shelf-life). The sample unit was represented by three replicates (baskets) of 25 fruits each for all the treatments. The experiments were performed twice. In all experiments, control fruits were represented by untreated fruits placed in the same conditions. Results were collected by recording the percentage of fruits with symptoms of rot in each treatment and the lesion’s diameter (mm) by using a ruler.

2.7. FT-IR Spectroscopy

Kiwifruit samples (50 g) treated 24 h with B. nigra defatted meal volatiles and untreated were collected in sterile tubes (2 mL), stored at −80 °C and lyophilized. Fruit samples were analyzed by FT-IR spectroscopy to obtain a rapid and non-destructive characterization of their main molecular components. Infrared spectra were recorded with a Bruker ALPHA series FT-IR spectrophotometer (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany) equipped with an apparatus for attenuated total reflectance (ATR-Diamond crystal). The spectra were collected from 4000 to 400 cm⁻¹ and averaged over 100 scans (resolution = 4 cm⁻¹): four spectra were measured for each sample. Spectra were registered both on fruit skin and fruit flesh to study their different biochemical compounds and their variations.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Data were statistically handled by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistical comparison of means was carried out to reveal the differences between treatments using Tukey’s HSD Test (α = 0.05). All analyses were performed with MiniTab 16 software. The EC50 of each substance was calculated using the probit analysis applied to mycelial growth inhibition percentage.

3. Results

3.1. In Vitro Assays with Antagonists

The efficacy of the three-tested antagonists (L1, L8, and Th1) on C. luteo-olivacea isolates (CadA, CadB, CadC) mycelial growth in the co-culturing condition and to the exposure of non-volatile and volatile metabolites produced by the antagonist strains was determined (Figure 1; Table 1). All the strains significantly reduced the pathogen colony growth. Aureobasidium pullulans L1 and L8 showed a lower efficacy than T. harzianum (21.6%, 23.6%, and 78.8%, respectively, on average) against C. luteo-olivacea isolates mycelial growth. The non-volatile metabolites of all the tested antagonists significantly inhibited C. luteo-olivacea isolates. As reported above, Th1 non-volatile metabolites showed the best results inhibiting fungal isolates growth by 65.6%, on average. Aureobasidium pullulans L1 and L8 respectively inhibited pathogen isolates by 43.6% and 23%, on average. Antagonist volatile metabolites were more effective against CadC mycelial growth, displaying a reduction of 25%, 27%, and 100% respectively by L1, L8, and Th1, than against the other two fungal isolates CadA and CadB (8%, 13%, 69% and 17%, 19%, 94%, respectively). However, each tested antagonist resulted most active against C. luteo-olivacea CadC compared to the other fungal isolates. Further, L1 and L8 volatile metabolites arrested the fungal sporulation (data not shown).

3.2. In Vitro Assays: Amended Medium (Fludioxonil and CaCl₂) and Brassica nigra Defatted Meal Biofumigation

The effectiveness of fludioxonil on mycelial and CFU growth of CadA, CadB, and CadC, as product EC₅₀ values, are reported in Table 2. CaCl₂ efficacy on C. luteo-olivacea CadA, CadB, and CadC mycelial growth was shown by in vitro assays, determined through a baseline of the EC₅₀ values for each fungal isolate (Table 2). In Table 2, only EC₅₀ values referred to mycelial were reported for CaCl₂ because no inhibition was detected against CFU growth.

Besides this, CadB appeared as the most resistant pathogen to the target substances; in fact, all the EC₅₀ values were over 0.65 g L⁻¹ and 1.4 g L⁻¹, and 28 g L⁻¹, respectively, for fludioxonil and CaCl₂. Conversely, CadA displayed the lowest EC₅₀ values: 0.13 g L⁻¹ and 0.18 g L⁻¹, and 16.8 g L⁻¹, respectively, for the compounds mentioned above. EC50 values of 0.32 g L⁻¹ and 1.2 g L⁻¹, and 22.7 g L⁻¹ were calculated for CadC, respectively, for CFU and mycelial growth exposed to fludioxonil and CaCl₂.

Concerning the effect of volatile compounds on C. luteo-olivacea isolates mycelial growth by the defatted B. nigra meal, the treatment was effective. The mycelium of all pathogens was wholly inhibited (100%) (Supplementary Materials Figure S1).

3.3. In Vivo Assays

After four months of storage, kiwifruits treated with BCAs notably reduced the pathogen’s incidence (Figure 2a). Cadophora luteo-olivacea isolate C resulted, despite the effective treatments, the most aggressive, showing an incidence of 11.3% on average. Th1 resulted the most efficient BCA inhibiting C. luteo-olivacea isolates CadA, CadB, CadC by 100%, 100%, and 88.5% respectively, followed by L1 (85.1%, 100%, 82.8%) and L8 (92.5%, 89.6%, 77%).

Regarding the treatments with fludioxonil, kiwifruits were dipped in solutions concentrated 1 g/L. The treatment displayed an excellent efficacy against C. luteo-olivacea isolates incidence. In fact, fungal pathogens were reduced by 56.9%, 85.5%, and 100% (Figure 2b).

Dipping by CaCl₂ showed a better result in in vivo assay than in vitro experiments, where the product did not display an effective inhibition on mycelial and conidial pathogens growth. In this case, CaCl₂ reduced CadA, CadB, CadC aggressiveness by 64.1%, 65.1%, and 36.6% (Figure 2c). The biofumigation of kiwifruits with B. nigra defatted meal was less effective in controlling fungal isolates, therefore not confirming the results obtained by in vitro tests (Figure 2d). On the contrary, the treatment stimulated CadA and CadB incidence on kiwifruit (+48.8 and +31.1%). The treatment stimulated the fungal evasion but did not negatively influence the disease severity (Figure 3). In fact, by removing the first layer of the peel, treated fruit displayed a lesion reduction compared to the untreated control by 27%, 42%, and 50%, respectively, for CadA, CadB, and CadC.

3.4. FT-IR Kiwifruit Analysis

The variations of the biochemical compounds in kiwifruits flesh and skin biofumigated with B. nigra were monitored by ATR/IR spectroscopy. This technique allows studying the chemical composition of the first μm of sample surface because chemical bonds absorb the IR radiation selectively. Therefore, the frequency (expressed as wavenumbers and measured in cm⁻¹) and intensity of the peaks can give valuable indications on any chemical variation occurring in the fruit, and the spectroscopic technique has been successfully applied to monitor changes induced by fungal activity in kiwifruit [17] and stone fruits [18]. To clarify those variations, Figure 4a,b reports the difference spectra between treated and not treated kiwifruit (dashed line) so that positive peaks represent biochemical compounds whose content is increasing, while negative peaks those which are decreasing. The main components that were the most affected by the treatment were pectins, proteins, and aromatic compounds in the pulp and in the peel (Figure 4a,b), with waxes on the fruit skin. In more detail, the protein content of the samples sensibly reduced after treatment (Amide I and Amide II bands located in the 1650–1530 cm⁻¹ spectral region [17,18]) both in pulp and peel. Pectin content is also generally reduced, except the 1720 cm⁻¹ band in kiwifruit pulp: this band is attributed to a specific kind of esterification of these carbohydrates, namely acetylation [18].

Conversely, many other bands attributed to other types of esterifications usually decreased (i.e., 1234, 1124 and 930 cm⁻¹ bands [18]). On the other hand, the hemicellulose band at 820–810 cm⁻¹ [17] and free glucose (780–770 cm⁻¹) [18] slightly increased, indicating partial depolymerization of polysaccharides (i.e., the prominent cellulose bands around 1040–1000 cm⁻¹ decrease their intensity). In kiwifruit peel, skin waxes increased their content (bands at 2920, 2850 and 1470 cm⁻¹) [18] and changed their chemical composition after treatments: as a matter of fact, the esterification degree of waxes increased (positive 1730 cm⁻¹ band [18] in Figure 4b) while the unsaturation degree decreased (negative band in the difference spectrum centered at 2970 cm⁻¹ [18]). To conclude the IR spectra examination, the increase of phenolic compounds (flavonoid, anthocyanins, and lignins) was detected in both peel and pulp in the 1610–1590 cm⁻¹ spectral region [17,18].

4. Discussion

Alternative methods for kiwifruit decay control have always been studied and tested with encouraging results [5,19] but always against the most common post-harvest pathogens such as B. cinerea, Penicillium expansum, Alternaria alternata, Rhizopus stolonifer [13]. A pathogen such as C. luteo-olivacea represents a critical problem in these last years, even if its incidence in the post-harvest phase seems to be strictly connected to field conditions, making it less manageable. Spadaro et al. [3] demonstrated that kiwifruit, which showed a low level of dry matter and high nitrogen content, could be more susceptible to C. luteo-olivacea infection.

Little is known about the natural products and biological systems to control this pathogen. The study presented some interesting results about the possibility of preserving kiwifruit quality using alternative methods to fungicides against the skin pitting causal agent. Despite this, it is often rare to find alternatives that give a level of control comparable with that obtained using synthetic fungicides [20]. Furthermore, our study showed interesting results where T. harzianum showed the highest inhibitory activity against the three tested C. luteo-olivacea isolates (CadA, CadB, CadC) by volatile, non-volatile, and by dual culture assay, displaying high percentages of inhibition such as on average, respectively, by 90%, 70.6%, and 78.8%. The biocontrol activity exerted by A. pullulans L1 and L8 strains was less efficient; consequently, the pathogen has been challenging to control on most of the carried-out treatments. By in vitro experiments, both strains reduced on average by VOCs, no-VOCs, and dual culture the pathogen isolates respectively by 23.3% and 25.8%, 50% and 34.7%, and 22.5 and 23.6%. It is known that the antifungal activity of microorganisms by in vitro and in vivo conditions can vary depending on pathogen aggressiveness and growth behavior [5,21]. In fact, L1 and L8 yeasts against B. cinerea of kiwifruit showed an excellent efficacy by competing for nutrients [5] through in vitro and in vivo experiments. Against C. luteo-olivacea regarding the in vivo experiments, the tested BCAs showed better efficacy than in vitro to significantly reduce the skin pitting symptoms, especially for L1 and L8 strains that probably activated a resistance response on kiwifruits [16,18].

Between the alternative strategies tested to control C. luteo-olivacea isolates, CaCl₂ activity was verified before by in vitro assay to define the most active concentration to use during the in vivo phase. CaCl₂ concentration of 0.8 g L⁻¹ resulted in the most efficient, although the EC50 values were averagely high (22.5 g L⁻¹) against mycelial growth. It has been reported that pre and post-harvest calcium application in fruit tissues delays softening rate and ripening by retarding the disintegration of cell walls [22]. Antunes et al. [21] reported that fruits dipped in 1% CaCl₂ softened slower than fruits not treated. In the present study, in vivo assay fruits were not affected by CaCl₂ treatment; on the contrary, they showed reasonable control of the skin pitting symptoms (on average 53% of fungal incidence inhibition), displaying the benefits of this treatment on the storage life of kiwifruit.

The study included as reference treatment the use of a fungicide with fludioxonil as an active compound. The product (Scholar) was used first in in vitro assay to define the most active concentration against C. luteo-olivacea isolates mycelial growth and defining its EC50 value (on average, 0.36 and 0.92 g L⁻¹, respectively for CFU and mycelial growth). Our results showed that fludioxonil displayed a good efficacy starting from 1 g L⁻¹ of concentration, a reduced amount with respect to the kiwifruit reference dose (1.3 g L⁻¹) for B. cinerea post-harvest inhibition, also probably reducing the residue levels. Nevertheless, the tested fungicide cannot be used in kiwifruits to be marketed within 5 months of its application unless fruits stayed for a more extended period in storage [13]. However, the debate on the comparative safety of synthetic and natural pesticides is still open.

This study also showed that kiwifruit dipping in the most active fludioxonil solution (1 g L⁻¹) before the cold storage effectively reduced the post-harvest skin pitting symptoms after 4 months of storage, as reported for B. cinerea by Kim et al. [23] and Lolas-Caneo et al. [24] also on different products.

As an alternative treatment, the biofumigation in cold storage with AITC was carried out, always after testing its potential efficacy against C. luteo-olivacea isolates mycelial growth that was total (100% of inhibition). The use of AITC needs a better understanding of its mode of action and toxicological effect to establish its safety [25]. In Japan, synthetic AITC is registered as a food additive, and preliminary data show that food preserved with AITC vapor contains a very low residue of this compound [26]. The biofumigation treatment determined a decrease of pectins amount and their chemical variation (increased of ester-acetylation) and a partial degradation of polysaccharides components (hemicellulose and free glucose), probably influencing the fungal behavior as monitored by FT-IR analysis. It is well known that different degrees of esterification can affect plant susceptibility to pathogens [27,28,29,30]. The treatment affected the fruit resistance, making it more susceptible to the fungal attack: an increase in protein content was a consequence of the volatile compounds produced by A. pullulans in stone fruit [18], which helped to control brown rot better.

On the contrary, the increases of waxes and phenolics, already observed in stone fruits [18], is a typical response of the plant to fungal attack: waxes are responsible for the thickening of cell walls, while phenolics compounds enhance both the antioxidant activity and membrane integrity.

At the same time, the in vivo assay showed that the pathogens were stimulated to grow faster through an external sporification with respect to the control. In this case, the treatment showed two different modes of action if directly applied against fungal growth or on fruits. However, in vivo, the treatment reduced the fungal severity but not the incidence. The potential use of volatile fungicides to control post-harvest diseases requires a detailed examination of their biological activity and dispersion in fruit tissues and developing a formula that inhibits pathogens’ growth without producing phytotoxic effects on fruits.

Although the management of post-harvest diseases by employing BCAs or natural substances has been successfully evaluated on many species and against many pathogens, their efficacy could be increased by adopting an integrated strategy that combines both strategies and including antagonists and physical methods, including sometimes the use of fungicides at low doses [31].

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/horticulturae7070169/s1, Figure S1: Brassica nigra defatted meal biofumigation treatment on Cadophora luteo-olivacea isolate CadA mycelial growth (mm).

Author Contributions

A.D.F., conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, supervision; M.D.F., formal analysis, data curation, writing—original draft preparation; A.V., investigation, methodology; E.B., project administration, supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The study was performed in the ambit of the activities of a collaboration with AGRINTESA (Faenza, Italy), coordinated by Ugo Palara and Francesco Bassi. The authors would like to thank Paolo Bertolini and Ornella Francioso for the technical support. The study supports the Project EUPHRESCO coordinated by Gianfranco Romanazzi.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

Gramaje, D.; Mostert, L.; Rmengol, J. Characterization of Cadophora luteo-olivacea and C. melinii isolates obtained from grapevines and environmental samples from grapevine nurseries in Spain. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2011, 50, 112–126. [Google Scholar]
Khol, J.; Wenneker, M.; Groenenboom-de Haas, B.H.; Anbergen, R.; Goossen-van de Geijn, H.M.; Lombaers-van der Plas, C.H.; Pinto, F.A.M.F.; Kastelein, P. Dynamics of post-harvest pathogens Neofabraea spp. And Cadophora spp. in plant residues in Dutch apple and pear orchards. Plant Pathol. 2018, 67, 1264–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Spadaro, D.; Galliano, A.; Pellegrino, C.; Gilardi, G.; Garibaldi, A.; Gullino, M.L. Dry matter and mineral composition, together with commercial storage practices, influence the development of skin pitting caused by Cadophora luteo-olivacea on kiwifruit ‘Hayward’. J. Plant Pathol. 2010, 92, 339–346. [Google Scholar]
Snowdon, A.L. A Color Atlas of Post-Harvest Diseases and Disorders of Fruits and Vegetables General Introduction and Fruits; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1990; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
Di Francesco, A.; Mari, M.; Ugolini, L.; Baraldi, E. Effect of Aureobasidium pullulans strains against Botrytis cinerea on kiwifruit during storage and on fruit nutritional composition. Food Microbiol. 2018, 72, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cook, D.W.M.; Long, P.G.; Ganesh, S. The combined effect of delayed application of yeast biocontrol agents and fruit curing for the inhibition of the post-harvest pathogen Botrytis cinerea in kiwifruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 1999, 16, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cheng, L.; Nie, X.; Jiang, C.; Li, S. The combined use of the antagonistic yeast Hanseniaspora uvarum with β-aminobutyric acid for the management of post-harvest diseases of kiwifruit. Biol. Control 2019, 137, 104019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sharma, R.; Singh, D.; Singh, R. Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables by microbial antagonists: A review. Biol. Control 2009, 50, 205–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mari, M.; Leoni, O.; Bernardi, R.; Neri, F.; Palmieri, S. Control of brown rot on stonefruit by synthetic and glucosinolate-derived isothiocyanates. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2008, 47, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ugolini, L.; Martini, C.; Lazzeri, L.; D’Avino, L.; Mari, M. Control of post-harvest grey mould (Botrytis cinerea Per.: Fr.) on strawberries by glucosinolate-derived allyl-isothiocyanate treatments. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2014, 90, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chen, H.; Gao, H.; Fang, X.Y.L.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, H. Effects of allyl isothiocyanate treatment on post-harvest quality and the activities of antioxidant enzymes of mulberry fruit. Postharvest Biol. 2015, 108, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Thomidis, T.; Prodromu, I. Evaluation of the effectiveness of three fungicides against pathogens causing post-harvest fruit rot of kiwifruit. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2018, 47, 485–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Conway, W.S. The effects of post-harvest infiltration of calcium, magnesium or strontium on decay, firmness, respiration and ethylene production in apples. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1987, 112, 300–303. [Google Scholar]
Mari, M.; Spadoni, A.; Ceredi, G. Alternative technologies to control postharvest diseases of kiwifruit. Stewart Postharvest Rev. 2015, 11, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
Di Francesco, A.; Calassanzio, M.; Ratti, C.; Mari, M.; Folchi, A.; Baraldi, E. Molecular characterization of the two post-harvest biological control agents Aureobasidium pullulans L1 and L8. Biol. Control 2018, 123, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Di Francesco, A.; Milella, F.; Mari, M.; Roberti, R. A preliminary investigation into Aureobasidium pullulans as a potential biocontrol agent against Phytophthora infestans of tomato. Biol. Control 2017, 114, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bonora, S.; Francioso, O.; Tugnoli, V.; Prodi, A.; Di Foggia, M.; Righi, V.; Nipoti, P.; Filippini, G.; Pisi, A. Structural characteristics of “Hayward” kiwifruit from elephantiasis-affected plants studied by DRIFT, FT-Raman, NMR and SEM techniques. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 4827–4832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Di Francesco, A.; Di Foggia, M.; Baraldi, E. Aureobasidium pullulans volatile organic compounds as alternative post-harvest method to control brown rot of stone fruits. Food Microbiol. 2020, 87, 103395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ugolini, L.; Righetti, L.; Carbone, K.; Paris, R.; Malaguti, L.; Di Francesco, A.; Micheli, L.; Paliotta, M.; Mari, M.; Lazzeri, L. Postharvest application of brassica meal-derived allyl-isothiocyanate to kiwifruit: Effect on fruit quality, nutraceutical parameters and physiological response. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 54, 751–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
El-Ghaouth, A.; Wilson, C.L. Biologically-based technol-ogies for the control of post-harvest diseases. Postharvest News Inf. 1995, 6, 5N–11N. [Google Scholar]
Antunes, M.D.C.; Neves, N.; Curado, F.; Rodrigues, S.; Franco, J.; Panagopoulos, T. The effect of calcium applications on kiwifruit quality preservation during storage. ISHS Acta Hortic. 2005, 753, 727–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Roy, S.; Conway, W.S.; Watada, A.E.; Sams, C.E.; Pooley, C.D.; Werning, W.P. Distribution of the anionic sites in the cell wall of apple fruit after calcium treatment. Quantification and visualization by a cationic colloidal gold probe. Protoplasma 1994, 178, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kim, J.O.; Shin, J.H.; Gumilang, A.; Chung, K.; Choi, K.Y.; Kim, S.K. Effectiveness of different classes of fungicides on Botrytis cinerea causing gray mold on fruit and vegetables. Plant Pathol. 2016, 32, 570–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Lolas-Caneo, M.; Diaz, G.A.; Mendez, R.; Caceres, M.; Neubauer, L. Evaluation of the efficacy of fungicide fludioxonil in the post-harvest control of bull’s eye rot (Neofabraea alba) in Chile. Acta Hortic. 2016, 1144, 461–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mari, M.; Bertolini, P.; Pratella, G.C. Non-conventional methods for the control of post-harvest pear diseases. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 94, 761–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Isshiki, K.; Tokuora, K.; Mori, R.; Chiba, S. Preliminary examination of allyl isothiocyanate vapor for food preservation. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1992, 56, 1476–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Le Cam, B.; Massiot, P.; Campion, C.; Rouxel, F. Susceptibility of carrot cultivars to Mycocentrospora acerina and the structure of cell wall polysaccharides. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 1994, 45, 139–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
McMillan, G.P.; Hedley, D.; Fyffe, L.; Pérombelon, M.C.M. Potato resistance to soft-rot erwinias is related to cell wall pectin esterification. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 1993, 42, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Marty, P.; Jouan, B.; Bertheau, Y.; Vian, B.; Goldberg, R. Charge density in stem cell walls of solanum tuberosum genotypes and susceptibility to blackleg. Phytochemistry 1997, 44, 1435–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wydra, K.; Berl, H. Structural changes of homogalacturonan, rhamnogalacturonan I and arabinogalactan protein in xylem cell walls of tomato genotypes in reaction to Ralstonia solanacearum. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2006, 68, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Di Francesco, A.; Mari, M. Use of biocontrol agents in combination with physical and chemical treatments: Efficacy assessment. Stewart Postharvest Rev. 2014, 1, 1–4. [Google Scholar]

Figure 1. Percentage of inhibition of Cadophora luteo-olivacea isolates (CadA, CadB, CadC) mycelial growth co-cultured with Aureobasidium pullulans (L1 and L8 strains) and Trichoderma harzianum (Th1) for 15 days at 20 °C. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Within C. luteo-olivacea isolate, different letters represent significant differences among BCAs to evaluate their efficacy according to Tukey’s HSD Test (α = 0.05).

Figure 2. Kiwifruits treatments. (a) Antagonistic effect by Aureobasidium pullulans (L1 and L8) and Trichoderma harzianum (Th1) against Cadophora luteo-olivacea isolates (CadA, CadB, CadC). Kiwifruits were artificially inoculated with antagonists cells and conidia suspensions (20 μL) (10⁸ cells mL⁻¹ and 10⁵ conidia mL⁻¹, respectively) and after 1 h with C. luteo-olivacea isolates conidial suspension (20 μL, 10⁵ conidia mL⁻¹). (b,c) Effect of synthetic treatment (fludioxonil 1 g L⁻¹) and CaCl₂ (0.8 g L⁻¹) 1 min dipping on kiwifruit, suddenly artificially inoculated with C. luteo-olivacea isolates conidial suspension (20 μL, 10⁵ conidia mL⁻¹). (d) Kiwifruits, artificially inoculated with C. luteo-olivacea isolates conidial suspension (20 μL, 10⁵ conidia mL⁻¹) and bio fumigated with B. nigra defatted meal (10 g, 30 mL of SDW) inside a storage cabinet (0.1 m³) for 24 h at 0 °C. Fruits were incubated for 5 months at 0 °C and 90% RH. Fruit inoculated with water and not biofumigated were considered as control treatment. Each value is the mean of three replicates (75 fruits) ± standard deviation. According to Tukey’s HSD Test, different letters represent significant differences within the treatments among the fungal isolates (α = 0.05).

Figure 3. Effect of AITC bio fumigation on Cadophora luteo-olivacea isolates aggressiveness (mm) on kiwifruit. Biofumigated fruit were artificially inoculated with 20 μL of CadA, CadB, CadC conidia suspensions (10⁵ conidia mL⁻¹) and stored for 5 months at 0 °C. The lesion diameters (mm) were measured by removing the first layer of fruit peel. Each value is the mean of three replicates ± standard deviation. According to Tukey’s HSD Test, different letters represent significant differences within the treatment among the fungal isolates (α = 0.05).

Figure 4. ATR/IR spectra of the kiwifruit pulp (a) and peel (b). The continuous lines represent the treated fruits IR spectra, while the dashed lines represent the difference spectra between the treated and the reference fruits.

Table 1. Effect of different treatments (VOCs and No-VOCs by L1, L8, and Th1) on the development of Cadophora luteo-olivacea isolates (CadA, CadB, CadC) mycelial growth (mm). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Within C. luteo-olivacea isolate and treatment (VOCs and No-VOCs), different letters represent significant differences among BCAs to evaluate their efficacy according to Tukey’s HSD Test (α = 0.05).

	Treatments	Pathogen Isolates (mm)
	Treatments	CadA	CadB	CadC
VOCs	Control	30 ± 0.70 c	30 ± 2.0 c	29 ± 1.25 d
	L1	20 ± 1.92 b	23 ± 2.82 b	25 ± 2.08 c
	L8	21 ± 2.07 b	24 ± 1.25 b	21 ± 1.73 b
	Th1	9 ± 1.70 a	0.0 ± 0.0 a	0.0 ± 0.0 a
No-VOCs	Control	30 ± 0.70 d	30 ± 2.0 d	29 ± 1.25 c
	L1	16 ± 1.85 b	16 ± 0.66 b	15 ± 1.20 b
	L8	21 ± 2.33 c	20 ± 1.45 c	17 ± 1.52 b
	Th1	8 ± 0.33 a	10 ± 0.00 a	8 ± 0.88 a

Table 2. EC₅₀ values of fludioxonil and CaCl₂ tested on Cadophora luteo-olivacea isolates colony growth and CFU. EC₅₀ values were calculated using the probit analysis applied to the percentage of inhibition of CFU and mycelial diameter growth, detected after 15 days of incubation at 20 °C. Different letters indicate significant differences among fungal isolates, according to Tukey’s HSD Test (α = 0.05).

		EC₅₀ Values (g/L)
Isolate	Fludioxonil		CaCl₂
Isolate	CFU	Mycelium	Mycelium
CadA	0.13 a	0.18 a	16.8 a
CadB	0.65 c	1.4 b	28.0 c
CadC	0.32 b	1.2 b	22.7 b

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Di Francesco, A.; Di Foggia, M.; Vittoria, A.; Baraldi, E. Post-Harvest Non-Conventional and Traditional Methods to Control Cadophora luteo-olivacea: Skin Pitting Agent of Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa (A. Chev.). Horticulturae 2021, 7, 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7070169

AMA Style

Di Francesco A, Di Foggia M, Vittoria A, Baraldi E. Post-Harvest Non-Conventional and Traditional Methods to Control Cadophora luteo-olivacea: Skin Pitting Agent of Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa (A. Chev.). Horticulturae. 2021; 7(7):169. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7070169

Chicago/Turabian Style

Di Francesco, Alessandra, Michele Di Foggia, Alessio Vittoria, and Elena Baraldi. 2021. "Post-Harvest Non-Conventional and Traditional Methods to Control Cadophora luteo-olivacea: Skin Pitting Agent of Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa (A. Chev.)" Horticulturae 7, no. 7: 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7070169

APA Style

Di Francesco, A., Di Foggia, M., Vittoria, A., & Baraldi, E. (2021). Post-Harvest Non-Conventional and Traditional Methods to Control Cadophora luteo-olivacea: Skin Pitting Agent of Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa (A. Chev.). Horticulturae, 7(7), 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7070169

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Menu

Post-Harvest Non-Conventional and Traditional Methods to Control Cadophora luteo-olivacea: Skin Pitting Agent of Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa (A. Chev.)

Abstract

1. Introduction