Next Article in Journal
Adaptive Management Lessons for Serianthes nelsonii Conservation
Previous Article in Journal
Growth and Competitive Infection Behaviors of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Bradyrhizobium elkanii at Different Temperatures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seed Germination and Storage of the Endangered Species Manglietia crassipes Y. W. Law (Magnoliaceae)

1
Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf, Nanning Normal University, Ministry of Education, Nanning 530001, China
2
Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2021, 7(3), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7030042
Submission received: 18 January 2021 / Revised: 22 February 2021 / Accepted: 24 February 2021 / Published: 28 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Propagation and Seeds)

Abstract

:
Manglietia crassipes, a critically endangered species narrowly distributed on Mount Dayao in Guangxi, China, is also a species of ornamental interest whose variability has not been explored. Key factors leading to its endangerment have also not been studied. Here, two experiments were conducted to test the effects of different plant growth regulators and different storage conditions on germination characteristics of M. crassipes seeds. Fruit morphology was measured, and germination characteristics of fresh mature seeds were tested in order to assess natural seed vigor. Seeds were soaked in distilled water (control), or gibberellic acid (GA3), 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA) or indoleacetic acid (IAA) solutions of different concentrations, for 48 h to determine their effects on seed germination. In addition, the effects of different seed storage conditions (constant 4 °C, −7 °C, −20 °C, or 25 °C for 100 days, wet stratification at 4 °C for 100 days) on seed germination were investigated. Results showed that the abortive rate of the mature fruits was high (28.9%) and fresh natural seeds had a low germination rate (G) and germination index (GI). Seed germination was inhibited with 6-BA at all concentrations, but only at less than 100 m·L1 IAA; otherwise, IAA slightly promoted seed germination. GA3 broke seed dormancy and significantly accelerated seed germination by improving G, GI and initial germination time (IGT), especially over 2500 mg·L1. The viability of seeds declined no matter how they were stored. However, 4 °C wet stratification storage was preferable for seed vigor and germination power. Our results suggest that the high abortive rate of fruits, low germination of the natural seed, seed dormancy and its intolerance to storage, contributed to the endangerment of M. crassipes. GA3 can break M. crassipes seed dormancy, which can be a benefit for future ornamental breeding and further protection or conservation.

1. Introduction

Manglietia crassipes Y. W. Law (family: Magnoliaceae) is an endemic tree of China. Manglietia is comprised of about 40 species distributed in tropical and subtropical Asia. In China, there are 27 to 29 species (15 to 17 of which are endemic), mostly distributed in the southern area of the Yangtze River [1]. M. crassipes is a small-sized evergreen tree about 4 m tall. It was first described in 1982, while a specimen of it was first collected in 1959 [2]. With white, fragrant flowers, dense branches and leaves, and a popular aesthetic, it is commonly used as an ornamental tree [3]. However, it only grows in forests of altitudes of about 1300 m on Mount Dayao, Guangxi, China. The species was listed as critically endangered in the China Species Red List [4] owing to its restricted distribution. Our field investigation found that there were 100–1000 trees in total on Mount Dayao, mostly scattered. Thus, it is urgent to study the seed propagation of this species to prevent it from dying out.
Magnoliaceae is one of the most threatened angiosperm families, in which several species are endangered and at risk of extinction [5]. Magnoliaceae plants in the wild reproduce through seeds, and much previous research has focused on the mechanisms underlying seed propagation, such as seed collection, preparation and storage, and nursery selection, and especially on seed dormancy and germination [3,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
In Manglietia, studies attempting to understand seed germination and dormancy have been carried out for some species such as M. grandis [20,21,22] and M. patungensis [23,24]. However, there is no information on seed propagation of the lesser-known species M. crassipes, which is now facing the threat of extinction. In order to prevent it from extinction, we should understand the mechanisms of seed propagation for improving artificial propagation technology. Here, we carried out a series of seed germination experiments to test the vigor of the fresh seeds. Meanwhile, a series of concentration gradient experiments using the plant growth regulators GA3, 6-BA and IAA, as well as different seed storage conditions, were applied to understand their effects on germination and dormancy of M. crassipes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Seed Source

Mature follicles of M. crassipes (some fruits dehisced naturally exposing red-oily arillate) were collected from the Nature Reserve of Yinsha (24°9′41″ N, 110°13′44″ E; 1161 m a.s.l.) on Mount Dayao (Jinxiu County, Guangxi province, China). Considering that seed germination may be influenced by individual differences within species, seed collection times, storage methods and plant growth regulator treatment, we collected 103 fruits from eight randomly distributed trees of M. crassipes on 29 August 2011. Detailed local information for the eight trees is presented in Table 1. The developmental characters of fruit were observed and recorded. Fruits were collected and threshed naturally in the laboratory. Seeds were then washed manually [25]. After sterilizing seeds with 75% ethanol for 30 s, they were quickly rinsed with sterile water three times and dried with absorbent paper. Sterilized seed were stored as described below for 100 days.

2.2. Character Traits of Fruits and Seeds

The length and diameter of the carpopodium and the length and width of each fruit and carpel were measured directly using a vernier calliper. Carpels were counted from 20 random fruits. Developing seeds and abortive seeds of each carpel were counted, and the abortion rate was calculated. The mean size, including length, width and thickness of seeds was measured from 20 random seeds using a vernier calliper.
Main characteristics of seeds, including thousand seed weight and seed vigor, were measured through the “hundredseed methods” [26], and the 2,3,5-triphenyl-2H-tetrazolium chloride (TTC) method. Water imbibition of newly matured seeds (i.e., seeds recently removed from arils, 20 seeds, four replicates) was evaluated by soaking in distilled water and weighing every 2 h at 25 °C for the first 12 h and then at 12 h intervals until saturated. Moisture content of the seeds (20 seeds, four replicates) was measured as well as their fresh weights and dry weights. Seeds were dried in an incubator for about 24 h at 103 °C± 2 °C, until weight no longer changed, following [27].

2.3. Germination Tests under Different Plant Growth Regulators

The effect of gibberellic acid (GA3) on dormancy and germination of M. crassipes seeds was studied as follows: seeds were soaked in water at 35 °C for 24 h before putting them in 0, 200, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000 or 2500 mg·L−1 GA3, or 0, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 or 1000 mg·L−1 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA) or indoleacetic acid (IAA) for 48 h at 25 °C. They were then washed with water 3–5 times. Then, three replicates of 50 seeds each were randomly selected, placed in a culture dish and transferred to a growth cabinet PQX-260B for germination. Similarly, seeds were soaked in water for 48 h and transferred to the growth chamber. Growth conditions of the cabinet were a 12 h/12 h light/dark photoperiod at 20 °C in the dark and 25 °C in the light, a relative humidity of 80 ± 5% and an illumination intensity of 1500 lx.
The germination of the seeds was monitored daily until germination ceased. Monitored parameters included the initial germination time (IGT), germination percentage (G), germination power (GP) and germination index (GI). For each replication in each treatment, the germination percentage was calculated as G = (n/N) × 100, where n is the number of germinated seeds and N is the total number of seeds. The GI percentage was calculated as:
GI = i = 1 n Gi Di × 100 %
where Gi is the number of germinated seeds on the ith day and Di is the number of days. The germination power (GP) was calculated as GP = (Nm/N) × 100 where Nm represents the number of germinated seeds on the day when counts of germinated seeds reached the maximum, and N is the total number of seeds.

2.4. Viability and Storage

To identify suitable storage conditions and understand seed viability characteristics, three tests were conducted. In the first test, fresh, clean and disinfected seeds were packed in sealed polyethylene bags (approximately1000 seed/bag) and stored at 25 °C for 100 days. In the second test, seeds were packed in sealed polyethylene bags and stored at constant temperatures of 4, −7 or −20 °C for 100 days. The third test followed the same approach with seed stratified at 4 °C in moist sand for 100 days. Seed IGT, G, GP, and GI were assessed as described above. Seed viability was also determined using the TTC method. The procedure of the TTC method was as follows: 100 randomly selected seeds were soaked in 35 °C water for 24 h to fully imbibe. Then, each seed was cut in half along the center, placing one half in a culture dish and adding 0.5% TTC (w/v) solution before placing in an incubator in the dark at 35 °C for 24 h. The other half was boiled in water for 5 min to kill the embryo, and the same treatment was used as the control. After 24 h, the TTC solution was poured out, the seeds were washed with distilled water one to two times, and the color of the embryo was observed. All seeds with a red embryo were living seeds. The number of seeds with a red embryo were counted, and then the percentage seed vigor (with red color) was calculated.

2.5. Data Analysis

To compare the different effects of the three plant growth regulators on fresh and mature seed germination, and to determine the effect of different storage conditions on seed germination and viability, analysis of variance was used with multiple comparisons by Fisher’s Least Significant Difference Test at p < 0.05 using SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solutions, version 20). Means and standard error (SE) of each treatment were calculated.

3. Results

3.1. Basic Characteristics of Fruits and Seeds

There were 20 incompletely developed fruit among the 103 fruits collected (19.42%). The length of the carpopodium ranged from 4.2 to 6.5 cm (mean 5.2 cm). The diameter of the carpopodium was 7–10 mm (mean 8.4 mm). The mean length of the fruit was 5–7 cm (mean 5.2 cm), and its width was 3.6–5.0 cm (mean 4.4 cm). The length of the carpel was 1.1–2.3 cm (mean 1.8 cm) and the width was 0.6–1.3 cm (mean 1.0 cm). There was an average of 33 carpels, 210 developed seeds and 85 aborted seeds among the randomly selected 20 fruit, which means the abortion percentage was 28.9%. Detailed information is shown in Table 2. Appearance of the seed is shown in Figure 1.
Seed size (including the exotesta) of M. crassipes was 5–7 × 4–5 mm. Its thousand seed weight was 36.6 g (derived from the mean weight of 100 seeds with eight replicates at 3.66 g), and the coefficient of variation (CV) was 1.524, which is ≤4.0.

3.2. Moisture Content and Water Imbibition

The mean moisture content of fully developed seeds was 9.80%, with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.24%, SE of 0.12%, and CV of 2.5. Relative moisture content of seeds was 31.85% ± 0.87%, which was much higher than that of Magnolia punduana (26.43% ± 0.31%), as has been reported [19].
Seeds absorbed water increasingly through time until reaching saturation at about 84 h and then remained constant. Seeds absorbed water quickly during the first 2 h, after which, the absorption speed decreased gradually until saturation.

3.3. Germination Tests

Germination percentage (G), GP, GI, and its IGT of the seeds treated with GA3, 6-BA, and IAA were calculated, and the results are shown in Table 3 and Table S1. Germination with GA3 treatment was significantly different from that of the other treatments and the control. G of 6-BA was also greater than IAA at p ± ≤0.05 and the control was equal to both. Thus, we focused on the analyses of effects from GA3.
For the control, the germination rate was low with a mean of 0.16; mean GI was 0.149 and IGT was 46.3 h. The IGT of seeds treated with GA3 was the same (15.8 h) at all GA3 concentrations and was much earlier than that of the control (Table 3). The G and GI of GA3-treated seeds were higher than those of the control (Figure 2, Table 3). The GP and GI were significantly different from GA3, and also between GA3 A1 and A6, while no significant difference existed between the two adjacent groups, e.g., A1 and A2, A2 and A3 (Table 4). These results indicate that GA3 significantly affected seed germination compared with the control, and the effects of GA3 gradually increased with increasing concentration till 2500 mg·L−1. All of these results suggest that GA3 can break the seed dormancy of M. crassipes and promote seed germination.
Although the type of plant growth regulator was the main source of difference for the IGT, G, GP and GI, we observed some concentration gradient effects on GP and GI (Supplemental Tables S2–S5). Although the IGT of seeds treated with 6-BA was the same as those of the control, G and GI were lower (Figure 2B and Table 3). There were no significant differences observed in G and GI between the control and 6-BA. These results indicate that 6-BA can slightly inhibit seed germination.
Seed germination responded to IAA in a more complex manner. The G of C3 (100 mg·L−1) IAA was the same as that of ck (Figure 2C). When the concentration was lower than C3, IAA inhibited seed germination. The less IAA the lower the germination rate until C1 (20 mg·L−1), in which the least seeds germinated. However, IAA can slightly improve seed germination if its concentration is higher than that of C3 (Figure 2C).

3.4. Viability and Storage

Based on the above results, all stored seeds were soaked in 2500 mg·L−1 GA3 to test the effects of storage conditions on seed viability. Multiple comparisons and analysis of variance were conducted, and the results are presented in Table 5. The mortality of seeds not stored (unstained) was 8%, while that of seeds stratified at 4 °C in moist sand, at constant temperature (4, −7 or −20 °C), and at 25 °C, were 36, 46, 53, 59 and 81%, respectively. Significant differences at p < 0.05 and <0.01 were observed for the mortality between each other, but with no significant difference between −7 °C and −20 °C.
The seed vigor (red in TTC) in the control and stored at 4 °C in moist sand and at constant temperatures (4 °C, −7 °C, or −20 °C) were 73, 37, 27, 24 and 6%, respectively, and significant differences were observed between each storage method. Many seeds were found to exhibit weak germination viability (pink in TTC) under 4 °C moist sand stratification and constant temperature (4, −7 or −20 °C) conditions. Furthermore, significant differences in the percentage of weak seeds were observed between the group (4 °C moist sand stratification, 4 °C, and −7 °C) and another group (−20 °C, 25 °C, and the control).
From these results, we conclude that the seed germination viability of M. crassipes will be weakened no matter the storage method used. Therefore, it is important to collect and sow the seeds at the proper time. However, if seeds must be stored, 4 °C, moist sand stratification is the best method owing to the lower mortality and higher complete germination viability, and the second best method is 4 °C dry storage.

4. Discussion

4.1. Low Vigor of Seeds in the Wild Maybe the Major Reason for Endangered Status

Underdeveloped embryos at maturity, impermeability of the seed coat, and germination inhibitors are major reasons causing dormancy of Magnoliaceae seeds [10,13,14,16,17,19,23,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Seed morphophysiological dormancy was found in the species Manglietia patungensis, and the main reasons for seed dormancy were underdeveloped embryos and some germination inhibitors [23]. Seed dominancy varies among different species [7]. According to our results, physiological dormancy was indicated in M. crassipes by the different effects of GA3, 6-BA and IAA on seed germination. Some germination inhibitors may exist in seeds; 6-BA may promote inhibition, while GA3 can relieve inhibition and induce seeds to germinate, breaking dormancy. Whether there was morphological dormancy in M. crassipes needs more study because all seeds used in our research were mature seeds whose pericarp and testa were removed to exclude physical barriers to germination. Detailed seeds structures were not studied here.
The black control seeds had much lower germination rates than the stored seeds, but the stored seeds had lower viability. Under natural conditions, seeds are often found hanging on the fruit by a filar petiole after the follicle dehisces. Animals such as birds and rodents eat the exposed fleshy seeds, attracted by their vivid red color and sweet smell. Being swallowed by birds benefits seed transmission because the enteric canal and gastric acid of birds does not hurt the hard episperm or the inner embryo. However, if bitten by rodents, seeds are destroyed and lose their germination viability. Furthermore, seeds usually become moldy caused by the outer covered fleshy sarcotesta and its long dormancy of several months after falling from a tree. Therefore, seed germination is restricted in the wild and live seedlings are rare near adult trees of M. crassipes.

4.2. High Abortion Rate of the Fruit may Be a Potential Adaptation to Changed Environment

The high abortion rate of the fruit (28.9%) in M. crassipes probably is a potential adaptation to environmental change. It is usual for plants to selectively abort seeds (called “Selective Abortion Phenomenon”) in angiosperms [34]. Gene and resource limitations are the main reasons for selective abortion, and seeds or fruits with weak genotypes are abandoned, which not only improves the conformity between parents and offspring but also increases the diffusion rate of seeds or fruits [34]. The restricted distribution of M. crassipes, together with its low seed diffusion and germination rate, make it likely to adopt selective abortion to improve its adaption to the environment. Additional research on the blooming sequence, pollen type, pollination system and pollinators is required to understand this high abortion rate. There are three major reproductive paths in Magnoliaceae: self-pollination, cross-pollination and apomixis. Different species have different reproductive methods. In the related species Manglietia pachyphylla, self-pollination from the same flower presents self-incompatibility, and it tends to be xenogamous [35]. Reproductive paths for Manglietia crassipes are not clear and need further study.

4.3. Suggestions for the Protection of Manglietia crassipes

For the endangered status of M. crassipes, different papers have reported different opinions. In the “China Species Red List”, M. crassipes was listed as a “critically endangered species” [4]. The publications such as “CHINA PLANT RED DATA BOOK—Rare and Endangered Plants (Volume 1)” [36] and the “List of National Key Protected Wild Plants (First Batch)” (http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2000/content_60072.htm, accessed on 12 March 2019), did not treat it as a protected species. Based on our field surveys, M. crassipes was only distributed on Mount Dayao, in small, rare populations with less than 1000 individuals; thus the “critically endangered” status is most relevant. We suggest that this species should be treated as a grade I protected species in China.
Ex-situ conservation is an effective way to prevent M. crassipes from dying out. According to our results, 2500 mg·L1 GA3 was the most efficient plant growth regulator for improving the % seed germination GP, and GI. Before sowing, soaking seeds in 2500 mg·L1 GA3 was necessary for germination once collected from the wild. Once seeds have germinated, and seedlings have been grown outdoors, plants can be transferred to protected areas, such as botanical gardens. Guangxi Institute of Botany and Guangxi Medicinal Herb Garden are considered preferred places for growing seedlings of M. crassipes. The majority of one or two-year-old seedlings in the protected areas may then be returned to their original, or similar, habitats to increase the population. In addition, a seed bank for M. crassipes using 4 °C moist sand stratification is advised as the most efficient storage condition.

5. Conclusions

Fresh mature seeds of Manglietia crassipens in the wild have low germination rates. Physiological dormancy exists in seeds and GA3 can break dormancy. GA3 significantly improved germination rate and was best at 2500 mg·L1. 6-BA and IAA had different effects on seed germination, but the effects were slight. Germination viability of all stored seeds was obviously weakened. Using 4 °C moist seed stratification with sand is the recommended method for storing them for future propagation research.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/7/3/42/s1, Table S1: Parameters of mature seed vigor under different treatments of GA3, 6-BA, IAA. Table S2: Source of difference for the IGT through the Tests of Between-Subjects Effects. Dependent Variable: IGT. Table S3: Source of difference for the G through the Tests of Between-Subjects Effects. Dependent Variable: G. Table S4: Source of difference for the GP through the Tests of Between-Subjects Effects. Dependent Variable: GP. Table S5: Source of difference for the GI through the Tests of Between-Subjects Effects. Dependent Variable: GI.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.-H.W. and F.-G.W.; methodology, S.-G.C.; software, A.-H.W.; validation, Y.-Y.L. and X.-L.Y.; investigation and resources, S.-G.C.; formal analysis, A.-H.W. and S.-G.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.-H.W.; writing—review and editing, F.-G.W.; funding acquisition, A.-H.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the “National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 30871960”, and the “Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province, grant number 2018GXNSFBA138005”.

Acknowledgments

We thank Qing-Wen Zeng, the professor of South China Botanical Garden, for his providing the detailed collection information of M. crassipes.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xia, N.; Law, Y.; Hans, P.N. Magnoliaceae in Flora of China; 2008; Volume 7, pp. 52–61. Available online: http://flora.huh.harvard.edu/china/mss/volume07/Magnoliaceae.pdf (accessed on 12 March 2019).
  2. Law, Y. A new species of Magnoliaceae from Guangxi, China. Bull. Bot. Res. Harbin 1982, 2, 133–135. [Google Scholar]
  3. Law, Y.; Zeng, Q.W.; Zhou, R.Z.; Xing, F.W. Magnolias of China; Beijing Science and Technology Press: Beijing, China, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang, S.; Xie, Y. China Species Red List (Volume 1, Red List); Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ma, X.Y.; Jiao, G.L. The review on seed propagation of Magnoliaceae. Seed 2009, 10, 54–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ou, B. Research on nursery techniques and seedling growth rhythms of five varieties of Magnoliaceae. Jiangxi For. Sci. Tech. 2004, 6, 7–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tang, A.J.; Long, C.L.; Dao, Z.L. Review on development of seed dormancy mechanisms. Acta Bot. Yunnanica 2004, 26, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bao, S.C.; Wu, J. Fruit harvest, seeds treatment, storage and screen of trees in Magnoliaceae. Mod. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2005, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, B.H. Treatment and discern seeds of Magnoliaceae. Pract. For. Technol. 2005, 19–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Du, F.G.; Wang, H.; Yang, D.M.; Liu, C.Q.; Sun, S.G.; Wang, Z.M. Morphology and Biological Characters of Seed of Magnolia sieboldii K. Koch. J. J. Beihua Univ. Nat. Sci. 2006, 7, 269–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fang, X.P.; Xu, J.; Yang, C.H.; Sun, J.C.; Xu, L.Y. Seed propagation of ornamental plants in Magnoliaceae. Seed 2006, 25, 54–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yu, D.L.; Wang, D.; Gao, L.H.; Zhang, T.H.; Zhao, X.B. Plant introduction and seedling raising technique of Magnoliaceae in the Xiong-yue arboretum. J. Liaoning For. Sci. Tech. 2007, 6, 61–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lai, J.Y.; Liu, J.B.; Pan, C.L.; Li, X.D. Effect of different treatments on the seed germination of Kmeria septentrionalis. Guangxi Sci. 2008, 2, 195–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lu, X.J.; Wang, N.N.; Li, T.L.; Han, Y.F.; Yang, J. Effect of different soaking and accelerating germination disposals on forced germination of Magnolia sieboldii seeds. J. Northwest A F Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2008, 36, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Han, C.Y.; Long, C.L. Seed Dormancy, Germination and Storage Behavior of Magnolia wilsonii (Magnoliaceae), an Endangered Plant in China. Acta Bot. Yunnanica 2010, 32, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Han, C.Y.; Welbaum, G.; Long, C.L. Seed dormancy and germination of Michelia yunnanensis (Magnoliaceae). Sci. Hortic. 2009, 124, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lu, X.; Mei, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Ma, B. Effect of treatment with GA3 and variable temperature stratification on germination and endogenous hormones of Magnolia sieboldii seeds. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 2014, 34, 1828–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. César, J.P.; Rosa, R.C.; Joel, F. Seed germination of Magnolia pugana (Magnoliaceae), an endemic and endangered species from Western Mexico. Bot. Sci. 2016, 94, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Iralu, V.; Upadhaya, K. Dormancy, storability, and germination of seeds in Magnolia punduana (Magnoliaceae). Botany 2016, 94, 967–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bai, H.J. Study on Propagation Techniques of Manglietia grandis. Master’s Thesis, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China, 2016. Available online: https://CNKI:CDMD:2.1016.922349 (accessed on 12 March 2019).
  21. Pan, R.; Sun, W.B. Seed dormancy and germination of the critically endangered Manglietia grandis Hu et Cheng. Plant Physiol. Commun. 2009, 45, 1089–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, Z.Y.; Xiao, J. Seed germination and physiological characters of Manglietia grandis. J. Northeast For. Univ. (Chin. Ed.) 2016, 3, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, F.; Liang, H.; Wang, X.; He, Z.; Li, F. Seed dormancy and germination characteristics of Manglietia patungensis, an endangered plant endemic to China. Biodivers. Sci. 2007, 15, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, D.; Zhang, B.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Chen, F. Seed isozyme analysis of Manglietia patungensis during storage and germination. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 2011, 31, 1453–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zuo, J.B. The analysis of seed characteristic of Michelia yunnanensis. Guizhou For. Sci. Technol. 1994, 2, 44–46. [Google Scholar]
  26. ISTA. International Rules for Seed Testing; Translated by National Crop Seed Quality Supervision and Testing Center in Ministry of Agriculture (China), and Seed Science Centre of Zhejiang University; China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  27. ISTA. International Rules for Seed Testing, 2008/1 ed.; ISTA: Bassersdorf, Switzerland, 2008; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhou, Y.X. Preliminary study on seeds dormancy and germination of Michelia chapensis. J. Cent. South Univ. For. Technol. 1990, 10, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, P.; Lu, X.J.; Yao, F.; Guo, R. Preliminary Study on Reasons of Seed Dormancy of Magnolia sieboldii K. Koch. Seed 2006, 25, 36–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lu, X.J.; Li, T.L.; Ni, W.D. Study on the dormant characteristic of M. sieboldii K. Koch seeds. J. Shenyang Agric. Univ. 2006, 37, 703–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fu, X.Y.; Yu, G.Y.; Zhou, G.Z. Reasons of dormancy for seeds of Magnolia obovata. Liaoning For. Sci. Tech. 2008, 1, 1–3/9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zheng, Y.L.; Sun, W.B.; Zhao, X.F. Seed dormancy and germination of Manglietiastrum sinicum Law, a globally critical endangered plant in China. Plant Physiol. Commun. 2008, 44, 100–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fernando, M.T.R.; Jayasuriya, K.M.G.; Walck, J.L.; Wijetunga, A.S.T.B. Identifying dormancy class and storage behaviour of champak (Magnolia champaca) seeds, an important tropical timber tree. J. Natl. Sci. Found. Sri Lanka 2013, 41, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Zhao, X.J.; Tan, D.Y. Selective abortion and its evolutionary, ecological significance in seed plants. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 2007, 31, 1007–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Yang, X.L. Study on the Conservation Biology of the Endangered Plant Manglietia pachyphylla; South China Botanical Garden: Guangzhou, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  36. Fu, L.G.; Jin, J.M. China Plant Red Data Book—Rare and Endangered Plants (Volume 1); Science Press: Beijing, China, 1992. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Seed appearance of Manglietia crassipes.
Figure 1. Seed appearance of Manglietia crassipes.
Horticulturae 07 00042 g001
Figure 2. Seed germination rate changed when they were soaked in different concentrations of GA3, 6-BA and IAA. (A) Germination rate with GA3 treatment. A1–A6: 200, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500 mg·L1 GA3, respectively. (B) Germination rate with 6-BA treatment. B1–B6: 20, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000 mg·L1 6-BA, respectively. (C) Germination rate with IAA treatment. C1–C6: 20, 50, 100, 200, 500, and 1000 mg·L1 IAA, respectively. CK: water control.
Figure 2. Seed germination rate changed when they were soaked in different concentrations of GA3, 6-BA and IAA. (A) Germination rate with GA3 treatment. A1–A6: 200, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500 mg·L1 GA3, respectively. (B) Germination rate with 6-BA treatment. B1–B6: 20, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000 mg·L1 6-BA, respectively. (C) Germination rate with IAA treatment. C1–C6: 20, 50, 100, 200, 500, and 1000 mg·L1 IAA, respectively. CK: water control.
Horticulturae 07 00042 g002
Table 1. Collection locations of eight trees of Manglietia crassipes.
Table 1. Collection locations of eight trees of Manglietia crassipes.
TreeLongitudeLatitudeElevation (m)
A110°13′50″ E24°09′58″ N1206
B110°14′36″ E24°10′29″ N1181
C110°14′35″ E24°10′26″ N1098
D110°14′38″ E24°10′11″ N1159
E110°14′38″ E24°10′08″ N1177
F110°14′35″ E24°10′13″ N1172
G110°13′45″ E24°09′48″ N1182
H110°13′44″ E24°09′41″ N1161
Table 2. Basic characters of fruits from Manglietia crassipes.
Table 2. Basic characters of fruits from Manglietia crassipes.
Numbered FruitNumber of CarpelsNumber of Developed SeedsNumbers of Aborted SeedsAbortion Rate
137267250.085616
237337520.133676
336281480.145897
436266470.15016
533225420.157303
634219810.27
732202780.278571
825142580.29
936227980.301538
1030197860.303887
1132199870.304196
12392641180.308901
1332183820.309434
1430150730.327354
1531199980.329966
1630165820.331984
1731193990.339041
1827125840.401914
19422411890.439535
20351351760.565916
Mean value33.25210.8585.150.288745
Table 3. Multiple comparisons of effects of GA3, 6-BA and IAA treatment on initial germination time (IGT), germination percentage (G), germination power (GP), and germination index (GI). SE is standard error and LSD is Fisher’s Least Significant Difference at P ≤ 0.05 and 0.01.
Table 3. Multiple comparisons of effects of GA3, 6-BA and IAA treatment on initial germination time (IGT), germination percentage (G), germination power (GP), and germination index (GI). SE is standard error and LSD is Fisher’s Least Significant Difference at P ≤ 0.05 and 0.01.
Plant Growth RegulatorsMeans IGTSELSD
0.050.01
GA315.781.00aA
6-BA46.728.74bB
IAA44.946.39bB
Control46.332.08bB
Plant growth regulatorsG (%)SELSD
0.050.01
GA3660.10aA
6-BA110.045cB
IAA160.046bcB
Control160.053bcB
Plant growth regulatorsGPSELSD
0.050.01
GA30.260.11aA
6-BA0.0680.023bB
IAA0.0980.041bB
Control0.080.02bB
Plant growth regulatorsGISELSD
0.050.01
GA31.510.30aA
6-BA0.110.04bB
IAA0.150.05bB
Control0.150.04bB
Table 4. Multiple comparisons for the effects of increasing concentrations of GA3 on GP and GI. A1-A6 are 200, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500 mg·L1 GA3, respectively. SE is standard error and LSD is Fisher’s Least Significant Difference at p ≤ 0.05 and 0.01.
Table 4. Multiple comparisons for the effects of increasing concentrations of GA3 on GP and GI. A1-A6 are 200, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500 mg·L1 GA3, respectively. SE is standard error and LSD is Fisher’s Least Significant Difference at p ≤ 0.05 and 0.01.
Concentration GradientMean of GPSELSD
0.050.01
A10.120.07aA
A20.190.03abABC
A30.240.05abcABC
A40.270.04bcABC
A50.330.03bcABC
A60.420.07cC
Control0.080.02abABC
Concentration GradientMean of GISELSD
0.050.01
A11.060.12aA
A21.300.17abABC
A31.450.11abcABC
A41.670.18bcBC
A51.740.04bcBC
A61.860.09cC
Control0.150.04dD
Table 5. Multiple comparisons of seed vigor stored at different conditions. SE is standard error and LSD is Fisher’s Least Significant Difference at P ≤ 0.05 and 0.01.
Table 5. Multiple comparisons of seed vigor stored at different conditions. SE is standard error and LSD is Fisher’s Least Significant Difference at P ≤ 0.05 and 0.01.
Stored ConditionsUnstainedSELSD
0.050.01
Black control81.63fE
Indoor temperature, dry, 100 days811.00aA
4 °C cold stratification, 100 days36 2.83eD
4 °C, dry, room, 100 days462.58dC
−7 °C, dry, room, 100 days531.00cBC
−20 °C, dry, room, 100 days591.00bB
Stored ConditionsRed (%)SELSD
0.050.01
Black control732.52aA
Indoor temperature, dry, 100 days61.15eE
4 °C cold stratification, 100 days371.91bB
4 °C, dry, room, 100 days271.00cC
−7 °C, dry, room, 100 days171.00dD
−20 °C, dry, room, 100 days241.63cC
Stored ConditionsLight redSELSD
0.050.01
Black control191.00bB
Indoor temperature, dry, 100 days131.00cB
4 °C cold stratification, 100 days271.91aA
4 °C, dry, room, 100 days273.00aA
−7 °C, dry, room, 100 days301.15aA
−20 °C, dry, room, 100 days172.52bcB
Note: unstained seeds indicated they were dead; Red indicated all of them can germinate; Light red presented seeds have weak germination vigor.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, A.-H.; Yu, X.-L.; Liu, Y.-Y.; Chen, S.-G.; Wang, F.-G. Seed Germination and Storage of the Endangered Species Manglietia crassipes Y. W. Law (Magnoliaceae). Horticulturae 2021, 7, 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7030042

AMA Style

Wang A-H, Yu X-L, Liu Y-Y, Chen S-G, Wang F-G. Seed Germination and Storage of the Endangered Species Manglietia crassipes Y. W. Law (Magnoliaceae). Horticulturae. 2021; 7(3):42. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7030042

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Ai-Hua, Xiao-Ling Yu, Yan-Yan Liu, Shu-Gang Chen, and Fa-Guo Wang. 2021. "Seed Germination and Storage of the Endangered Species Manglietia crassipes Y. W. Law (Magnoliaceae)" Horticulturae 7, no. 3: 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7030042

APA Style

Wang, A. -H., Yu, X. -L., Liu, Y. -Y., Chen, S. -G., & Wang, F. -G. (2021). Seed Germination and Storage of the Endangered Species Manglietia crassipes Y. W. Law (Magnoliaceae). Horticulturae, 7(3), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7030042

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop