Next Article in Journal
Optical Properties and Antioxidant Activity of Water-Ethanolic Extracts from Sempervivum tectorum L. from Bulgaria
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Chitosan, Sucrose, Glucose, and Fructose on the Postharvest Decay, Quality, Enzyme Activity, and Defense-Related Gene Expression of Strawberries
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Storage Conditions and Cooking Methods on Chlorophyll, Glucosinolate, and Sulforaphane Content in Broccoli Florets

1
College of Horticulture, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
2
Engineering Research Center for Horticultural Crop Germplasm Creation and New Variety Breeding, Ministry of Education, Changsha 410218, China
3
Key Laboratory for Vegetable Biology of Hunan Province, Changsha 410128, China
4
National Engineering and Technology Research Center for Preservation of Agricultural Products, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Postharvest Physiology and Storage of Agricultural Products, Tianjin 300192, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Co-first author.
Horticulturae 2021, 7(12), 519; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7120519
Submission received: 16 September 2021 / Revised: 18 November 2021 / Accepted: 21 November 2021 / Published: 24 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Postharvest Biology, Quality, Safety, and Technology)

Abstract

:
The effects of storage conditions and cooking methods on chlorophyll, glucosinolate (GSL), and sulforaphane content in broccoli florets were investigated in this study. For the storage experiment, fresh broccoli florets were stored for 2, 4, and 6 days at 10, 4, and 0 °C with or without 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) treatment. For the cooking experiment, fresh broccoli florets were cooked for 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 min under three cooking methods, namely, steaming, microwaving, and boiling. Results showed that the contents of chlorophyll, aliphatic GSL, indole GSL, and sulforaphane in broccoli florets of two cultivars decreased with prolonged storage time. The retained contents of chlorophyll, GSLs, and sulforaphane under 0 °C storage condition were significantly higher than those under 10 °C storage condition after 6 days of storage. The sulforaphane content was increased by 1-MCP treatment but differed among varieties. The cooking experiment showed that aliphatic GSL content decreased with increased cooking time under three cooking methods, and indole GSL and sulforaphane contents had a fluctuating trend with increasing cooking time after steaming and microwaving. Sulforaphane content increased by 17.15–50.16% relative to that in fresh broccoli florets and was considerably affected by cooking time. The highest level of sulforaphane content was retained for 7 min during steaming or 5 min during microwaving. Therefore, the combination of 1-MCP treatment and 0 °C storage condition had the best performance in preserving chlorophyll, GSLs, and sulforaphane. Moreover, steaming for 7 min or microwaving for 5 min is a more effective method for preserving the quality and increasing the sulforaphane content of broccoli florets than boiling.

1. Introduction

Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) contains high levels of vitamins, minerals, polyphenols, and a group of phytochemicals named glucosinolates (GSLs), and it has been characterized with a high nutritional value [1]. GSLs are sulfur-rich, secondary metabolites characteristic of the Brassicales order with important biological and economic roles in plant defense and human nutrition [2,3,4]. These compounds have gained renewed interest as their major hydrolysis products, such as sulforaphane, exert chemoprotective effects through the action of the endogenous enzyme myrosinase [5]. The most abundant GSLs in broccoli is glucoraphanin (GRA), which can be hydrolyzed into sulforaphane by myrosinase [6]. Sulforaphane can effectively prevent or reverse cancers, hepatic, steatosis, and cardiovascular diseases [7,8,9,10].
Broccoli has high respiration and transpiration rates, making it highly perishable [11]. This results in substantial economic losses and poses a challenge to post-harvest storage, logistics, and supply management [12]. Therefore, storage conditions are essential for delaying decay and preserving quality of the fresh product. Many post-harvest handling methods have been investigated to extend the shelf life and retain the nutraceutical values of broccoli [13,14,15]. GSL biosynthesis at the development stage or degradation at the storage stage is a complex process. The effect of post-harvest on GSLs [15,16,17] has been widely studied, whereas few studies have explored sulforaphane. The green color and high GSL content of broccoli florets are usually maintained through low-temperature storage or with an inhibitor of ethylene synthesis (1-methylcyclopropene, 1-MCP) treatment. These two ways inhibit chlorophyll and GSL degradation, which can maintain green color, extend the shelf life, and delay GSL degradation during storage [18,19,20,21]. However, few studies have focused on the effect of temperature or 1-MCP treatment on sulforaphane content during storage in broccoli florets.
Cooking method is another factor to affect GSL or sulforaphane degradation before broccoli florets are eaten. In general, broccoli is prepared at home for convenience and taste preference rather than for the retention of nutrients and health-promoting compounds. Boiling and microwaving are common cooking methods in Western societies, whereas steaming and frying are common in China. Boiling results in severe GSL loss probably through thermal degradation [1,22,23]. Steaming and microwaving vegetables produced conflicting results, and the GSL content change is time-dependent for different cooking methods [22,24,25]. Therefore, an optimum time for steaming or microwaving may increase or preserve GSLs or sulforaphane bioavailability and prevent their breakdown during prolonged heating.
Accordingly, this study aims to investigate the influences of three storage temperatures (10, 4, and 0 °C) with/without 1-MCP treatment and cooking methods (and time) on color, GSLs, and sulforaphane content of broccoli. Optimizing the storage condition and cooking time can help improving the nutritional value of broccoli florets.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Treatment

The experiment was carried out in a natural climate greenhouse at Hunan Agriculture University, Changsha, China, from 30 August 2019 to 6 March 2020. Broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. cv Yanxiu and Xiangsan No.3) seeds were sowed in plastic trays (50 cells, one seedling per cell) containing substrates on 30 August 2019 and cultivated in a greenhouse with natural climate. Yanxiu and Xianglv No.3 are broccoli varieties with low and high sulforaphane content, respectively. After the full development of the fourth leaf, the plants were randomly transferred to plastic pots containing 10 L of substrates (peat: vermiculite: perlite = 2:1:1) on 2 October 2019. A total of 200 plants from each variety were used. After 1 week of pre-culturing, the seedlings were fertilized with full-strength Hoagland’s nutrient solution at five-day intervals, and 1 L of nutrient was applied for per plant. After 80% broccoli budding, 1.5 high-strength Hoagland’s nutrient solution was used as fertilizer at five-day intervals until harvesting. The broccoli florets with 13–15 cm diameters and uniform size, without pests and mechanical damage, were harvested. The harvested florets were used in the subsequent experiment.
In this experiment, three biological replications were employed for each treatment. Two broccoli florets were mixed for per sample. Fresh broccoli florets were used as control samples. In detail, the mature broccoli plants cultured in plastic pots were moved to the laboratory. Then, the plants were randomly divided into 10 groups (one fresh floret group, six storage groups, and three cooking groups). The florets were cut and then were immediately stored or cooked. For storage without and with 1-MCP treatment, fresh broccoli florets were divided into six groups, and three groups were immediately placed in an airtight container (length × width × height = 1 m × 1 m × 1 m) fumigated with the 1-MCP powder (Aladdin, Shanghai, China) at 10, 4, and 0 °C for 24 h. The final concentration of evaporated 1-MCP inside the container (volume 1 m3) was 10 μg/L. Then, the florets were packed with 0.02 mm PE film at the corresponding storage temperatures. The three other groups were subjected to the same treatment but were not fumigated with 1-MCP. All broccoli florets were stored under darkness for 2, 4, and 6 days after harvest. At the same time, a group for the determination of chlorophyll, GSLs, and sulforaphane content of fresh broccoli florets was selected.
For the cooking experiment, broccoli florets were cleaned and cut into 2 cm pedicels for the three cooking treatments (boiling, steaming, and microwaving). For the boiling treatment, 200 g of broccoli pedicels were immersed in 3 L of boiling water. For the steaming treatment, 200 g of broccoli pedicels were evenly spread out without any overlap on a stainless-steel steamer basket and transferred into 3 L of boiling water. For the microwave treatment, 200 g of broccoli pedicels were placed on a plate and covered with a paper towel soaked in 50 mL of water, and then cooked in a microwave oven at 700 W. All cooked broccoli samples were treated for 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 min, and then immediately transferred into an ice water bath for cooling, packed in a bag, and stored immediately in an ultralow-temperature refrigerator at −80 °C until they were used in measuring GSL and sulforaphane contents.

2.2. Chlorophyll Content Measurement

Chlorophyll was extracted from broccoli florets with a mixture containing acetone, ethanol, and water (4.5:4.5:1, v/v/v). Chlorophyll content was measured according to the method as described by Inskeep and Bloom [26]. Briefly, approximately 10 g of broccoli florets (fresh and stored for 2, 4, and 6 days without and with 1-MCP treatment) was dipped in 100 mL of the above mixture until they turned white to extract the chlorophyll a and b content in a dark condition. The absorbance of the extract liquor was determined by a microplate reader at 645 and 663 nm. The chlorophyll content was calculated as follows: chlorophyll content (mg/g) = 7.84 × OD663 + 20.21 × OD645. Measurements were performed thrice, and the obtained results were expressed as milligram of total chlorophyll per gram of tissue.

2.3. Determination of GSLs Content

GSLs were quantified according to a previously described procedure with minor modification [27]. Approximately 500 mg of broccoli floret powder was transferred into two 15 mL tubes and extracted with 4 mL of 70% methanol at 75 °C for 20 min. Then, 0.1 mL of internal standard (sinigrin, 5 mol/L) was added to each sample. After the GSLs extract were cooled, 2 mL of 0.4 mol/L barium acetate was added, and the mixture was centrifuged. The supernatant was transferred into a 10 mL volumetric flask. Subsequently, the sample was mixed with 3 mL of 70% methanol and centrifuged. The supernatant was transferred into a flask to a volume of 10 mL for desulfoglucosinolate isolation through anion-exchange chromatography. DEAE Sephadex A-25 was preactivated with 2 mmol/L acetic acid, and 0.5 mL of DEAE Sephadex A-25 anion-exchange resin was used to fill a 2.5 mL column for the purification of the extracted GSLs. The column was washed twice with 1 mL of water before extract loading. Afterward, 5 mL of the crude extract was placed onto the column, and then washed twice with 1 mL of water. Desulfoglucosinolate was then released on the column by adding 0.5 mL of sulfatase solution (0.5 mg/mL). The column was then closed and incubated at room temperature overnight for desulfation. On the following day, the column was washed with 3 mL of deionized water for the collection of desulfated GSLs.
Chromatographic and detection conditions were optimized as previously described by Kim et al. [27]. HPLC (California, USA, Agilent, 1260) instrument and Agilent C18 analytical column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) were used. The mobile phase consisted of water (A) and methanol (B). Chromatography was performed at a flow rate of 1 mL/min at 30 °C with the following elution program: the first step at linear gradient from 0% B to 20% for 25 min, and then linear gradient from 20% B to 30% B for 10 min, isocratic elution 90% B for 10 min, and equilibration of 0% B for 5 min. The injection volume of samples was 40 μL. Desulfated GSLs were detected by a diode array detector at 229 nm and mass spectrometer with QTOF. The source conditions were as follows: capillary, 3.5 kV; cone, 30 V; extractor, 5 V; source temperature, 120 ℃; and desolvation temperature, 350 ℃. The spray was stabilized by a cone gas flow of 100 L/h, and the desolvation gas flow was adjusted to 750 L/h. Compounds were identified by comparing the MS data (retention time, ions, and confirmation transition). An internal standard (sinigrin, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used for the quantitation of desulfated GLs in accordance with ISO 9167-1 and the method of Schonhof et al. [28].

2.4. Determination of Sulforaphane Content

SF was extracted and quantified as described by Huang et al. [29]. Approximately 2 g of floret powder sample was transferred into a flask with 4 mL of deionized water and incubated at room temperature for 4 h. The products were extracted with 40 mL of dichloromethane by shaking three times at 5 min intervals. Anhydrous sodium sulfate was added to the dichloromethane fraction for the further purification of SF in a funnel. The filtered solution was vacuum-dried in a rotary evaporator at 38 °C. The dried products were eluted with 2 mL of acetonitrile (HPLC grade).
The eluted SF was cryopreserved at −20 °C. Before determination, the eluted solution was filtered through a 0.22 μm filter to an autosampler vial. Sulforaphane was determined using the Agilent 1260 Series high-performance liquid chromatography system. The determination parameters were as follows: mobile phase, 20% acetonitrile and 80% water; wavelength, 240 nm; column temperature, 30 °C; injection volume, 10 μL; column, C18 reversed-phase column; flow rate, 1 mL/min; and time, 30 min. The standard (SF, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used for quantitation.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

In this study, the results were displayed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three replicates. All data were subjected to an analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) by SPSS 20.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Duncan’s test (p < 0.05) was performed to observe differences between the treatment means. Retained ratio of chlorophyll, GSL, and sulforaphane contents were calculated according to the following formula: Retained ratio (%) = Content after storage or cooking/Content of fresh broccoli × 100%.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Storage Condition on Chlorophyll Content in Broccoli Florets

Under different storage conditions, chlorophyll contents in broccoli florets of two varieties continuously decreased with increasing storage time. For the ‘Yanxiu’ variety, the decrease rate of chlorophyll content from samples stored at 4 and 0 °C were lower than that at 10 °C, and chlorophyll contents under 4 °C and 0 °C storage conditions were significantly higher during the entire storage period (Figure 1A). For ‘Xianglv No.3′, no significant difference in chlorophyll content was found among the three storage temperature conditions on the second and fourth day of storage. However, the content under the 0 °C condition was significantly higher than those at 4 °C and 10 °C only on the sixth day of storage (Figure 1B).
1-MCP is a gaseous ethylene action inhibitor and has been widely used to extend the storage lives of many vegetables and retain quality. Under 1-MCP treatment, the chlorophyll contents in broccoli florets of ‘Yanxiu’ were significantly higher than those of the control samples in the entire storage period. However, the change was nonsignificant for ‘Xianglv No.3′. In comparison with the chlorophyll contents of fresh broccoli florets, retained ratio of chlorophyll content was 90.9% for ‘Yanxiu’ and 84.0% for ‘Xianglv No.3′ under 0 °C after 1-MCP treatment. Therefore, 0 °C storage condition and 1-MCP treatment had good effects on broccoli chlorophyll preservation.

3.2. Effect of Storage Condition on GSL Content in Broccoli Florets

The effect of storage temperature on GSL content in broccoli florets of the two varieties is shown in Figure 2. Seven kinds of GSLs were identified in the broccoli florets through HPLC (Table S1). Three GSLs were aliphatic GSLs (AGS), and four were indole GSLs (IGS).
The total GSL content in the ‘Xianglv No.3′ cultivar was 28.74 μmol/g DW and was significantly higher than that in the ‘Yanxiu’ cultivar (18.92 μmol/g DW) at harvest time (Figure 2A,B). The total GSL contents in broccoli florets of the two cultivars continuously decreased with increasing storage time under different storage conditions. In ‘Yanxiu’, the total GSL contents under 4 and 0 °C conditions were significantly higher than those under 10 °C (p < 0.05) during the whole storage period. The total GSL contents after 6 days of storage were 6.60 (10 °C), 9.69 (4 °C), and 11.22 (0 °C) μmol/g DW, which were 34.9%, 51.2%, and 59.3% of the values at harvest time, respectively. The data showed that the total GSL contents under 0 and 4 °C storage conditions were 70.0% and 46.8% higher than those under 10 °C storage condition, respectively. For ‘Xianglv No.3′, at the sixth day of storage, the total GSL contents of broccoli florets were 13.22 μmol/g DW (10 °C), 17.69 μmol/g DW (4 °C), and 20.44 μmol/g DW (0 °C), which were 46.0%, 61.6%, and 71.1% of those at harvest time, respectively. The contents at 0 and 4 °C were 54.6% and 33.8% higher than those under 10 °C (p < 0.05), respectively. At the sixth day of storage, 1-MCP treatment significantly increased the total GSL contents of the two varieties under 10 and 4 °C relative to that of the control group. The increasing effect was not significant under 0 °C, and the retained ratio of total GSL contents after 1-MCP treatment were 10.2% and 4.6% higher than those in the control group for the two varieties.
The contents of AGS and IGS decreased with increasing storage time (Figure 2C–F). The contents of AGS and IGS of the ‘Yanxiu’ florets were 2.49 and 16.43 μmol/g DW, respectively. In ‘Xianglv No.3′ florets, the AGS content was 4.34 μmol/g DW, and the IGS content was 24.40 μmol/g DW. For ‘Yanxiu’, the retained ratios of AGS contents were 50.6% (1.26 μmol/g DW, 10 °C), 57.0% (1.42 μmol/g DW, 4 °C), and 62.2% (1.55 μmol/g DW, 0 °C), while the retained ratios of IGS contents were 32.5% (10 °C), 50.33% (4 °C), and 58.9% (0 °C) at the sixth day of storage. AGS and IGS contents under 4 and 0 °C storage conditions had no significant difference but were significantly higher than those under 10 °C storage condition. For ‘Xianglv No.3′, the retained ratio of AGS contents were 38.9% (1.69 μmol/g DW, 10 °C), 48.5% (2.10 μmol/g DW, 4 °C), and 58.0% (2.52 μmol/g DW, 0 °C) after the sixth day of storage, whereas the retained rates of IGS contents were 47.3% (10 °C), 63.9% (4 °C), and 73.5% (0 °C). The AGS and IGS contents under the 0 °C storage conditions were significantly higher than those under the 4 and 10 °C storage conditions. Therefore, low temperature enhanced the delay of AGS and IGS degradation.
For ‘Yanxiu’, the average AGS contents in the control and 1-MCP-treated groups were 1.41 and 1.55 μmol/g DW, respectively, at the sixth day of storage, while the average IGS contents were 7.76 and 10.02 μmol/g DW. For ‘Xianglv No.3′, the AGS contents in the control and 1-MCP-treated group were 2.10 and 2.27 μmol/g DW, respectively, and the IGS contents were 15.02 and 15.97 μmol/g DW at the sixth day of storage. Statistical analysis showed that 1-MCP treatment increased AGS and IGS contents by 4.31–58.1% for the two varieties compared with those in the control group at the sixth day of storage.
The variation trend of most individual GSL content profiles was similar to that of total GSL, which continuously declined with increasing storage time. The content of 4-hydroxyglucobrassicin (4OH) and 4-methoxyglucobrassicin (4ME) in the broccoli florets of the two varieties had peak values at the fourth day of storage (Figure S1). The results suggested that 4OH and 4ME were biosynthesized or converted during storage. Moreover, IBE cannot be detected in the ‘Xianglv No.3′ broccoli florets due to its low content.

3.3. Effect of Storage Condition on Glucoraphanin and Sulforaphane Content in Broccoli Florets

GRA contents in the broccoli florets for the two varieties decreased with increasing storage time (Figure 3A,B). The GRA contents in the ‘Yanxiu’ and ‘Xianglv No.3′ florets were 2.08 and 3.97 μmol/g DW at harvest time, respectively. The content in ‘Xianglv No.3′ was approximately twice that of ‘Yanxiu’. After 6 days of storage, the retained ratio of GRA content were 50.5% (1.05 μmol/g DW, 10 °C), 57.7% (1.20 μmol/g DW, 4 °C), and 63.0% (1.31 μmol/g DW, 0 °C) in the ‘Yanxiu’. The content under the 0 °C storage condition was significantly higher than that under 10 °C, but no significant effect was observed under 4 °C. The retained ratio of GRA contents in ‘Xianglv No.3′ were approximately 40.6% (1.61 μmol/g DW, 10 °C), 50.9% (2.02 μmol/g DW, 4 °C), and 60.5% (2.40 μmol/g DW, 0 °C). The contents under 0 °C storage condition was 18.8% and 49.1% higher than that at 4 and 10 °C, respectively (p < 0.05). During the whole storage process, the retaining GRA content at 0 °C was higher than that at 4 and 10 °C, and the 0 °C storage temperature was the best storage condition for the two broccoli varieties for GRA retention. In comparison with the control group, the average GRA content in 1-MCP-treated group at the sixth day storage increased by approximately 13.4% for ‘Yanxiu’ and 7.5% for ‘Xianglv No.3′. However, no significant difference was observed between the 1-MCP-treated and control groups.
Under different storage conditions, the sulforaphane contents in broccoli florets of the two varieties showed a downward trend with prolonged storage time (Figure 3C,D). At harvest time, sulforaphane contents in ‘Yanxiu’ and ‘Xianglv No.3′ were 32.72 and 60.43 μg/g FW, respectively. After 6 days of storage, the sulforaphane contents in ‘Yanxiu’ were 14.62, 19.63, and 19.23 μg/g FW under 10, 4, and 0 °C conditions, retaining approximately 44.7%, 60.0%, and 58.8% of the contents at harvest time, respectively. The contents under 0 and 4 °C storage conditions were 31.5% and 34.3% higher than those under 10 °C. For ‘Xianglv No.3′, the sulforaphane contents were 28.56 (10 °C), 40.03 (4 °C), and 46.63 μg/g FW (0 °C) after 6 days of storage, retaining approximately 47.3%, 66.2%, and 77.2% of the contents at harvest time, respectively. The content under the 4 and 0 °C storage condition was significantly higher than that under 10 °C. In comparison with 10 °C storage condition, 4 and 0 °C storage conditions enhanced the retention of sulforaphane in broccoli. In comparison with the average sulforaphane content in the control group, the average sulforaphane content in 1-MCP-treated group at 6th day storage increased by approximately 23.4% for ‘Yanxiu’ and approximately 8.15% for ‘Xianglv No.3′. A significant increase was found in the 1-MCP-treated and control groups for ‘Yanxiu’, but no significant increase was found for ‘Xiangsan No.3′. Therefore, 1-MCP treatment can delay sulforaphane degradation in broccoli florets during storage, but the effect depends on the variety.

3.4. Effects of Cooking Method on GSL Content in Broccoli Florets

With prolonged cooking time, the change trends of total GSL content in the broccoli florets varied among the three different cooking methods (Figure 4A,B). For boiling, total GSL content decreased with cooking time. However, the content first decreased, and then increased, and finally decreased after 7 min of steaming or microwaving. At 7 min, the contents in ‘Yanxiu’ were 16.15 and 11.57 μmol/g DW after steaming and microwaving, respectively, and 3.29 μmol/g DW after boiling. The contents in ‘Xianglv No.3′ were 24.59 (steaming), 16.44 (microwave), and 5.49 μmol/g DW (boiling). Statistical analysis results show that the total GSL content in broccoli florets for the two varieties at 7 min under steaming and microwaving was significantly higher than that under boiling (p < 0.05).
The total IGS content of the broccoli florets had a similar trend compared with the total GSL content. The maximum value at 7 min was obtained through steaming and microwaving, and the content continuously decreased during boiling (Figure 4E,F). Unlike the total GSL content, the AGS content continuously decreased with cooking time (Figure 4C,D). The AGS contents in ‘Yanxiu’ were 1.61 (steaming), 1.34 (microwave), and 0.70 μmol/g DW (boiling), retaining 64.7%, 53.8%, and 28.1% of their original values at 7 min, respectively. In ‘Xianglv No.3′, the AGS contents were 2.37, 1.81, and 0.79 μmol/g, respectively, which decreased by 54.6%, 41.7%, and 18.2%, respectively. The AGS contents after steaming or microwaving were higher than that after boiling, and the highest value was obtained through steaming. Steaming and microwave methods could better retain the beneficial secondary metabolites in broccoli. For cooking broccoli, steaming and microwave methods are better than the traditional method of boiling.
For different cooking methods and time, the variation trend of individual profile GSL content was inconsistent. Notably, with prolonged cooking time, GER was not detected due to the values below the detection limit of HPLC, after boiling ‘Yanxiu’ for 3 min and ‘Xianglv No.3′ for 5 min. The contents of 4OH, and glucobrassicin (GBC) in the broccoli florets of the two varieties had minor wave trends, but reached the highest levels under steaming at different cooking times (Figure S2).

3.5. Effects of Cooking Method on Glucoraphanin and Sulforaphane Contents in Broccoli Florets

GRA content in broccoli florets had a trend similar to that of AGS content. The content continuously decreased with increasing cooking time (Figure 5A,B). The GRA contents in ‘Yanxiu’ were 1.30 (steaming), 0.92 (microwave), and 0.53 μmol/g DW (boiling), retaining approximately 62.5%, 44.2%, and 25.5% of their original values at 7 min. In ‘Xianglv No.3′, the GRA contents were 2.25, 1.69, and 0.79 μmol/g, respectively, retaining 56.7%, 42.6%, and 19.9% of their initial values, respectively.
Sulforaphane content in broccoli florets first decreased, then increased, and finally decreased with increasing cooking time in the three cooking methods, similar to AGS content (Figure 5C,D). In the boiling method, sulforaphane contents in the two varieties showed high rates of increases at 5 min, but the values were lower than those obtained at 0 min. In the microwave method, sulforaphane contents in the two varieties showed high rates of increases at 5 min. The content increased by 29.40% relative to that in the fresh florets of ‘Yanxiu’ but decreased by 10.8% relative to the content in ‘Xianglv No.3′. For steaming, sulforaphane contents in the two varieties reached their peaks at 7 min (49.13 μg/g in ‘Yanxiu’ and 70.79 μg/g in ‘Xianglv No.3′). The values increased by 50.16% and 17.15% relative to those of fresh florets. However, the sulforaphane contents of the two varieties decreased rapidly at 9 min. The sulforaphane contents of the two broccoli varieties can reach high levels with prolonged cooking time and were significantly higher than the content obtained through traditional water cooking. The best cooking time for steaming was 7 min, and the rental cooking time of microwave cooking was 5 min.

4. Discussion

4.1. Low Temperature with 1-MCP Delayed Yellowing and Nutrient Loss of Broccoli Florets

Color mainly determines the consumer purchasing power of a food product [30]. Low-temperature storage or 1-MCP treatment can delay chlorophyll degradation in florets, and the combination of 0 °C storage condition and 1-MCP treatment resulted in the lowest rate of decrease in chlorophyll content [31,32,33]. This result indicates the additive effects of both treatments (Figure 1). GSL or sulforaphane content could represent high nutritional value, and the metabolism is influenced by many factors, such as environmental condition, fertilization level, and storage strategies [34,35,36,37]. In the present study, the total GSL, AGS, and IGS contents remarkably decreased in the storage samples compared with fresh florets and were higher under 0 °C than 4 and 10 °C storage conditions (Figure 2). The results are explained below.
First, GSLs contact myrosinase, and was hydrolyzed to produce isothiocyanates (ITCs), when a plant tissue is damaged by mechanical wounding (e.g., chewing, chopping, or cutting) or by insects or humans [38]. The GSL content of broccoli floret significantly decreased when stored at 20 °C for five days, and this finding can be attributed to the observed activity of myrosinase [38]. Further, myrosinase activity decreased under 0 °C storage condition more than that under 4 or 10 °C, thus maintaining high levels of GSLs under lower temperature caused by the inhibited glucosinolate–myrosinase system. Subsequently, the GSL content was higher under 0 °C storage than that at 4 and 10 °C storage conditions (Figure 2).
Second, with increased storage time, tissue senescence was aggravated, and cellular integrity was interrupted in broccoli florets, thus facilitating the contact between myrosinase and GSLs and hydrolyzing the GSLs. Our results indicated that 1-MCP can inhibit the decrease in GSL content (Figure 2). 1-MCP delays tissue senescence by activating antioxidant enzyme systems, inhibiting membrane lipid peroxidation and ethylene signal transduction, and inhibiting respiration, thereby playing a significant role in maintaining cell membrane integrity [21,22,31]. Our results indicated that 1-MCP can inhibit the decrease in GSL content (Figure 2). The possible reason was that cell membrane integrity was protected by 1-MCP, and the contact between myrosinase and GSLs was prevented.
Third, the content of GRA, as precursor substance of sulforaphane, decreased with increasing storage time (Figure 3A). As a result, sulforaphane content had a decreasing trend with increasing storage time [39,40]. In addition, the GRA contents decreased by 55.3% and 52.7% under 10 °C storage condition, resulting in low GRA contents during 10 °C storage [38]. The results presented in Figure 3B show that the treatment of broccoli florets with 1-MCP significantly delayed the decrement in sulforaphane production. This result may be attributed to the increase in the substrate (GRA) in the broccoli florets treated with 1-MCP.

4.2. Steaming or Microwaving Reduced Nutrient Loss of Broccoli Florets

Cooking affects GSL composition and content of Brassica vegetables, and the effects depend on processing manner, cooking time, vegetable type, and degree of damage in cell tissues [1]. In the present study, the GSL content decreased, and significant rebound of IGS was observed after a cooking time of 3 min, and a peak was observed at 7 min of steaming (Figure 4). Similar results were found in the microwave treatment, and a peak occurred after a cooking time of 7 min for ‘Yanxiu’ and 5 min for ‘Xianglv No.3′ (Figure 4). Therefore, the GSL content during cooking is closely related to heating time. Cooking and heating may increase compound extractability [41]. In comparison with steaming and microwaving, boiling led to considerable GSL loss, and this finding corresponded well with previous studies [23]. GSLs are water-soluble compounds and are usually lost during conventional cooking due to leaching into surrounding water caused by cell lysis [24]. In the present work, GSL content significantly decreased to a higher degree during boiling than during steaming and microwaving (Figure 4). Therefore, boiling has an adverse effect on GSL content due to cell leakage.
The sulforaphane level in broccoli reflected two opposing physiological processes, namely, hydrolysis from GSLs by myrosinase and thermal degradation to volatile compounds. Endogenous myrosinase accelerates GRA hydrolysis caused by cell lysis under continuous thermal processes during cooking, while high temperature inactivates myrosinase activity and reduces hydrolysis rate. In the present study, the sulforaphane level first decreased, and then increased, and finally decreased under the three cooking methods (Figure 5). The increase in sulforaphane content can be attributed to high temperature, which may have dramatically reduced myrosinase activity, but the retained GRA can still be converted into sulforaphane by the enzymatic activity of the microbiota [42]. Sulforaphane was more stable than myrosinase [43]. As a result, sulforaphane accumulated under continuous myrosinase hydrolysis and low thermal degradation. With increased cooking time, GRA content significantly decreased, and high temperatures accelerated the generation of some volatile compounds from sulforaphane [44]. This process caused the decline in sulforaphane content. Notably, sulforaphane content had a peak at 7 min of steaming and at 5 min of microwaving (Figure 5). This result can help in the selection of the cooking method and time for retaining high sulforaphane level.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the contents of chlorophyll, total GSLs, AGS, IGS, and sulforaphane in broccoli floret of two varieties decreased with prolonged storage time. The 0 °C storage condition combined with 1-MCP treatment exerted the best effect for preserving chlorophyll, GSLs, and sulforaphane. After 6 days of storage, 58.8% and 77.2% of the sulforaphane contents of the two varieties were preserved under the 0 °C storage condition. 1-MCP treatment increased sulforaphane content, but the effect differed among varieties. The cooking experiment indicated that steaming and microwaving can effectively preserve the quality and increase the sulforaphane content of broccoli florets. Moreover, cooking time has a significant effect on sulforaphane content. The highest sulforaphane content was retained at 7 min of steaming or 5 min of microwaving. These results can provide valuable information for the storage and cooking of broccoli sprouts.

Supplementary Materials

The following materials are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/horticulturae7120519/s1, Figure S1: Effects of storage temperature and 1-MCP treatment on individual GSL content in broccoli florets. 4OH content ((A): Yanxiu, (B): Xianglv No.3), GBC content ((C): Yanxiu, (D): Xianglv No.3), 4ME content ((E): Yanxiu, (F): Xianglv No.3), NEO content ((G): Yanxiu, (H): Xianglv No.3), GER content ((I): Yanxiu, (J): Xianglv No.3), IBE content ((K): Yanxiu). 4OH: 4-hydroxyglucobrassicin; GBC: Glucobrassicin; 4ME: 4-Methoxyglucobrassicin; NEO: Neoglcobrassincin; GER: Glucoerucin; IBE: Glucoiberin. Storage temperature: 10, 4, and 0 °C; control: without 1-MCP treatment; 1-MCP: 1-MCP treatment; FB: fresh broccoli florets; storage time: 2, 4, and 6 days. Error bars represent SD from storage experiments. Different letters represent the comparison among FB and all treatments (p < 0.05). Figure S2: Effects of cooking method on individual GSL content in broccoli florets. 4OH content ((A): Yanxiu, (B): Xianglv No.3), GBC content ((C): Yanxiu, (D): Xianglv No.3), 4ME content ((E): Yanxiu, (F): Xianglv No.3), NGBC content ((G): Yanxiu, (H): Xianglv No.3), GER content ((I): Yanxiu, (J): Xianglv No.3), IBE content ((K): Yanxiu). 4OH: 4-hydroxyglucobrassicin; GBC: Glucobrassicin; 4ME: 4-Methoxyglucobrassicin; NEO: Neoglcobrassincin; GER: Glucoerucin; IBE: Glucoiberin. Red lines, steaming; blue lines, microwaving; black lines, boiling; error bars represent SD from storage experiments. Different letters represent the comparison among different cooking methods at same time (p < 0.05). Table S1: Desulfated GSLs identified in broccoli florets using HPLC.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.H., Q.W. and N.Z.; methodology, Y.Y., J.W. and S.M.; validation and formal analysis, Y.Y. and M.L.; investigation, Q.W. and S.W.; resources, K.H. and Q.W.; writing—original draft preparation, J.W. and S.M.; writing—review and editing, J.W., K.H. and Q.W.; visualization, Y.Y. and J.W.; supervision, K.H. and Q.W.; project administration, Y.Y. and S.M.; funding acquisition, K.H., Q.W. and J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32072568, 32072585, 31902023), Changsha Municipal Natural Science Foundation (kq2007016), and Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of CAAS (CAAS-XTCX2019025).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yuan, G.; Sun, B.; Yuan, J.; Wang, Q. Effects of different cooking methods on health-promoting compounds of broccoli. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2009, 10, 580–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Dinkova-Kostova, A.T.; Kostov, R.V. Glucosinolates and isothiocyanates in health and disease. Trends Mol. Med. 2012, 18, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lage, M.Á.P.; Jiménez López, C.; Simal-Gandara, J. Glucosinolates: Molecular structure, breakdown, genetic, bioavailability, properties and healthy and adverse effects. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2019, 90, 305–350. [Google Scholar]
  4. Martínez-Ballesta, M.; Moreno, D.A.; Carvajal, M. The physiological importance of glucosinolates on plant response to abiotic atress in brassica. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 11607–11625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Matusheski, N.; Jeffery, E.H. Comparison of the bioactivity of two glucoraphanin hydrolysis products found in broccoli, sulforaphane and sulforaphane nitrile. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 5743–5749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cai, C.; Miao, H.; Qian, H.; Yao, L.; Wang, B.; Wang, Q. Effects of industrial pre-freezing processing and freezing handling on glucosinolates and antioxidant attributes in broccoli florets. Food Chem. 2016, 210, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Valgimigli, L.; Iori, R. Antioxidant and pro-oxidant capacities of ITCs. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2010, 50, 222–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lippmann, D.; Lehmann, C.; Florian, S.; Barknowitz, G.; Haack, M.; Mewis, I.; Wiesner, M.; Schreiner, M.; Glatt, H.; Brigelius-Flohé, R.; et al. Glucosinolates from pak choi and broccoli induce enzymes and inhibit inflammation and colon cancer differently. Food Funct. 2014, 5, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Yang, G.; Lee, H.E.; Lee, J.Y. A pharmacological inhibitor of NLRP3 inflammasome prevents non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in a mouse model induced by high fat diet. Sci. Rep. UK 2016, 6, 24399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Traka, M.; Mithen, R. Glucosinolates, isothiocyanates and human health. Phytochem. Rev. 2009, 8, 269–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Brennan, P.S.; Shewfelt, R.L. Effect of cooling delay at harvest on broccoli quality during postharvest storage. J. Food Qual. 2010, 12, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ilahy, R.; Tlili, I.; Zoltán, P.; Montefusco, A.; Siddiqui, M.W.; Homa, F.; Hdider, C.; R’Him, T.; Lajos, H.; Lenucci, M.S. Pre-and post-harvest factors affecting glucosinolate content in broccoli. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7, 00147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bell, L.; Wagstaff, C. Enhancement of glucosinolate & isothiocyanate profiles in Brassicaceae crops: Addressing challenges in breeding for cultivation, storage, and consumer related traits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 9379–9403. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Casajús, V.; Demkura, P.; Civello, P.; Lobato, M.G.; Martínez, G. Harvesting at different time-points of day affects glucosinolate metabolism during postharvest storage of broccoli. Food Res. Int. 2020, 136, 109529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rybarczyk, A.; Hagen, S.F.; Borge, G.I.A.; Bengtsson, G.B.; Hansen, M.K.; Wold, A.-B. Glucosinolates in broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) as affected by postharvest temperature and radiation treatments. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 116, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hansen, M.; Møller, P.; Sørensen, H.; Trejo, M.C.D. Glucosinolates in broccoli stored under controlled atmosphere. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1995, 120, 1069–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Rodrigues, A.S.; Rosa, E.A. Effect of post-harvest treatments on the level of glucosinolates in broccoli. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1999, 79, 1028–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ku, V.; Wills, R. Effect of 1-methylcyclopropene on the storage life of broccoli. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 1999, 17, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fan, X.T.; Mattheis, J.P. Yellowing of broccoli in storage is reduced by 1-methylcyclopropene. HortScience 2000, 35, 885–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Yuan, G.; Sun, B.; Yuan, J.; Wang, Q. Effect of 1-methylcyclopropene on shelf life, visual quality, antioxidant enzymes and health-promoting compounds in broccoli florets. Food Chem. 2010, 118, 774–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fernández-León, M.F.; Fernández-León, A.M.; Lozano, M.; Ayuso, M.C.; González-Gómez, D. Different postharvest strategies to preserve broccoli quality during storage and shelf life: Controlled atmosphere and 1-MCP. Food Chem. 2013, 138, 564–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bongoni, R.; Verkerk, R.; Steenbekkers, B.; Dekker, M.; Stieger, M. Evaluation of different cooking conditions on broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) to improve the nutritional value and consumer acceptance. Plant Food Hum. Nutr. 2014, 69, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chiu, Y.-C.; Matak, K.; Ku, K.-M. Methyl jasmonate treatment of broccoli enhanced glucosinolate concentration, which was retained after boiling, steaming, or microwaving. Foods 2020, 9, 758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gliszczyńska-Świglo, A.; Ciska, E.; Pawlak-Lemańska, K.; Chmielewski, J.; Borkowski, T.; Tyrakowska, B. Changes in the content of health-promoting compounds and antioxidant activity of broccoli after domestic processing. Food Addit. Contam. 2006, 23, 1088–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Palermo, M.; Pellegrini, N.; Fogliano, V. The effect of cooking on the phytochemical content of vegetables. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 1057–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Inskeep, W.P.; Bloom, P.R. Extinction coefficients of chlorophyll a and b in N,N-dimethylformamide and 80% acetone. Plant Physiol. 1985, 77, 483–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Kim, Y.-B.; Li, X.; Kim, S.-J.; Kim, H.-H.; Lee, J.; Kim, H.; Sang, U.P. MYB transcription factors regulate glucosinolate biosynthesis in different organs of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis). Molecules 2013, 18, 8682–8695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Schonhof, I.; Krumbein, A.; Brückner, B. Genotypic effects on glucosinolates and sensory properties of broccoli and cauliflower. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2010, 2010. 48, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Huang, K.; Lin, J.C.; Wu, Q.Y.; Yan, J.Y.; Liu, M.Y.; Zhang, S.; Xiao, W.J. Changes in sulforaphane and selenocysteine methyltransferase transcript levels in broccoli treated with sodium selenite. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2015, 34, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rawson, A.; Patras, A.; Kumar, T.B.; Noci, F.; Koutchma, T.; Brunton, N.P. Effect of thermal and non-thermal processing technologies on the bioactive content of exotic fruits and their products. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 1875–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xu, F.; Chen, X.; Yang, Z.; Jin, P.; Wang, K.; Shang, H.; Wang, X.; Zheng, Y. Maintaining quality and bioactive compounds of broccoli by combined treatment with 1-methylcyclopropene and 6-benzylaminopurine. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 1156–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sharma, R.; Bhatia, S.; Kaur, P. Influence of packaging and storage conditions on biochemical quality and enzymatic activity in relation to shelf life enhancement of fresh basil leaf. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 3199–3211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhan, X.; Zhu, Z.; Sun, D.-W. Effects of pretreatments on quality attributes of long-term deep frozen storage of vegetables: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 2018, 59, 743–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Björkman, M.; Klingen, I.; Birch, A.N.E.; Bones, A.M.; Bruce, T.J.A.; Johansen, T.J.; Meadow, R.; Mølmann, J.; Seljåsen, R.; Smart, L.E.; et al. Phytochemicals of Brassicaceae in plant protection and human health-influences of climate, environment and agronomic practice. Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 538–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Guo, L.; Yang, R.; Wang, Z.; Guo, Q.; Gu, Z. Glucoraphanin, sulforaphane and myrosinase activity in germinating broccoli sprouts as affected by growth temperature and plant organs. J. Funct. Foods 2014, 9, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hanschen, F.S.; Schreiner, M. Isothiocyanates, nitriles, and epithionitriles from glucosinolates are affected by genotype and developmental stage in Brassica oleracea varieties. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 01095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Pellegrino, R.; Wheeler, J.; Sams, C.E.; Luckett, C.R. Storage time and temperature on the sensory properties broccoli. Foods 2019, 8, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Bones, A.M.; Rossiter, J.T. The enzymic and chemically induced decomposition of glucosinolates. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 1053–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zinoviadou, K.; Galanakis, C.M. Glucosinolates and respective derivatives (isothiocyanates) from plants. Food Bioact. 2017, 3–22. [Google Scholar]
  40. Li, R.; Zhu, Y. The primary active components, antioxidant properties, and differential metabolite profiles of radish sprouts (Raphanus sativus L.) upon domestic storage: Analysis of nutritional quality. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 5853–5860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Oliviero, T.; Verkerk, R.; Dekker, M. Effect of water content and temperature on glucosinolate degradation kinetics in broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica). Food Chem. 2012, 132, 2037–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fahey, J.W.; Wehage, S.L.; Holtzclaw, W.D.; Kensler, T.W.; Egner, P.A.; Shapiro, T.A.; Talalay, P. Protection of humans by plant glucosinolates: Efficiency of conversion of glucosinolates to isothiocyanates by the gastrointestinal microflora. Cancer Prev. Res. 2012, 5, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Wu, Y.; Shen, Y.; Wu, X.; Zhu, Y.; Mupunga, J.; Bao, W.; Huang, J.; Mao, J.; Liu, S.; You, Y. Hydrolysis before stir-frying increases the isothiocyanate content of broccoli. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 1509–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jin, Y.; Wang, M.; Rosen, R.T.; Ho, C.-T. Thermal degradation of sulforaphane in aqueous solution. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 3121–3123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effects of storage temperature and 1-MCP treatment on chlorophyll content in broccoli florets. (A) Yanxiu, (B) Xianglv No.3. Storage temperature: 10, 4, and 0 °C; control: without 1-MCP treatment; 1-MCP: 1-MCP treatment; FB: the fresh broccoli florets; storage time: 2, 4, and 6 days. Error bars represent SD from three replications of under every treatment under storage experiment. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Effects of storage temperature and 1-MCP treatment on chlorophyll content in broccoli florets. (A) Yanxiu, (B) Xianglv No.3. Storage temperature: 10, 4, and 0 °C; control: without 1-MCP treatment; 1-MCP: 1-MCP treatment; FB: the fresh broccoli florets; storage time: 2, 4, and 6 days. Error bars represent SD from three replications of under every treatment under storage experiment. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Horticulturae 07 00519 g001
Figure 2. Effects of storage temperature and 1-MCP treatment on GSL content in broccoli florets. Total GSL ((A): Yanxiu, (B): Xianglv No.3), AGS ((C): Yanxiu, (D): Xianglv No.3), IGS content (E): Yanxiu, and (F): Xianglv No.3). Storage temperature: 10, 4, and 0 °C; control: without 1-MCP treatment; 1-MCP: 1-MCP treatment; FB: fresh broccoli florets; storage time: 2, 4, and 6 days. Error bars represent SD from three replications of under every treatment under storage experiment. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Effects of storage temperature and 1-MCP treatment on GSL content in broccoli florets. Total GSL ((A): Yanxiu, (B): Xianglv No.3), AGS ((C): Yanxiu, (D): Xianglv No.3), IGS content (E): Yanxiu, and (F): Xianglv No.3). Storage temperature: 10, 4, and 0 °C; control: without 1-MCP treatment; 1-MCP: 1-MCP treatment; FB: fresh broccoli florets; storage time: 2, 4, and 6 days. Error bars represent SD from three replications of under every treatment under storage experiment. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Horticulturae 07 00519 g002
Figure 3. Effects of storage temperature on glucoraphanin and sulforaphane content in broccoli florets. Glucoraphanin content ((A): Yanxiu, (B): Xianglv No.3), sulforaphane content ((C): Yanxiu, (D): Xianglv No.3). Storage temperature: 10, 4, and 0 °C; control: without 1-MCP treatment; 1-MCP: 1-MCP treatment; FB: fresh broccoli florets; storage time: 2, 4, and 6 days. Error bars represent SD from three replications of under every treatment under storage experiment. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Effects of storage temperature on glucoraphanin and sulforaphane content in broccoli florets. Glucoraphanin content ((A): Yanxiu, (B): Xianglv No.3), sulforaphane content ((C): Yanxiu, (D): Xianglv No.3). Storage temperature: 10, 4, and 0 °C; control: without 1-MCP treatment; 1-MCP: 1-MCP treatment; FB: fresh broccoli florets; storage time: 2, 4, and 6 days. Error bars represent SD from three replications of under every treatment under storage experiment. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Horticulturae 07 00519 g003
Figure 4. Effects of cooking method on GSL content in broccoli florets. Total GSL content ((A): Yanxiu, (B): Xianglv No.3), total AGS content ((C): Yanxiu, (D): Xianglv No.3), total IGS content ((E): Yanxiu, and (F): Xianglv No.3). Red lines, steaming, blue lines, microwaving; black lines, boiling. Error bars represent SD from three replications of under every treatment under cooking experiment. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Effects of cooking method on GSL content in broccoli florets. Total GSL content ((A): Yanxiu, (B): Xianglv No.3), total AGS content ((C): Yanxiu, (D): Xianglv No.3), total IGS content ((E): Yanxiu, and (F): Xianglv No.3). Red lines, steaming, blue lines, microwaving; black lines, boiling. Error bars represent SD from three replications of under every treatment under cooking experiment. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Horticulturae 07 00519 g004
Figure 5. Effects of cooking method on glucoraphanin and sulforaphane contents in broccoli florets. Glucoraphanin content ((A): Yanxiu, (B): Xianglv No.3), sulforaphane content ((C): Yanxiu, (D): Xianglv No.3). Red lines, steaming, blue lines, microwaving; black lines, boiling. Error bars represent SD from three replications of under every treatment under cooking experiment. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Effects of cooking method on glucoraphanin and sulforaphane contents in broccoli florets. Glucoraphanin content ((A): Yanxiu, (B): Xianglv No.3), sulforaphane content ((C): Yanxiu, (D): Xianglv No.3). Red lines, steaming, blue lines, microwaving; black lines, boiling. Error bars represent SD from three replications of under every treatment under cooking experiment. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Horticulturae 07 00519 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, J.; Mao, S.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, N.; Wu, Q.; Liang, M.; Wang, S.; Huang, K.; Wu, Q. Effect of Storage Conditions and Cooking Methods on Chlorophyll, Glucosinolate, and Sulforaphane Content in Broccoli Florets. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 519. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7120519

AMA Style

Wang J, Mao S, Yuan Y, Zhang N, Wu Q, Liang M, Wang S, Huang K, Wu Q. Effect of Storage Conditions and Cooking Methods on Chlorophyll, Glucosinolate, and Sulforaphane Content in Broccoli Florets. Horticulturae. 2021; 7(12):519. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7120519

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Junwei, Shuxiang Mao, Yiming Yuan, Na Zhang, Qi Wu, Mantian Liang, Shengze Wang, Ke Huang, and Qiuyun Wu. 2021. "Effect of Storage Conditions and Cooking Methods on Chlorophyll, Glucosinolate, and Sulforaphane Content in Broccoli Florets" Horticulturae 7, no. 12: 519. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7120519

APA Style

Wang, J., Mao, S., Yuan, Y., Zhang, N., Wu, Q., Liang, M., Wang, S., Huang, K., & Wu, Q. (2021). Effect of Storage Conditions and Cooking Methods on Chlorophyll, Glucosinolate, and Sulforaphane Content in Broccoli Florets. Horticulturae, 7(12), 519. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7120519

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop