Next Article in Journal
Response of Eustoma Leaf Phenotype and Photosynthetic Performance to LED Light Quality
Previous Article in Journal
Yield Performance of Organic Sweetpotato Varieties in Various Mulches
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Horticulturae
Volume 3
Issue 4
10.3390/horticulturae3040049
horticulturae-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Short Note

Accessible Morphological and Genetic Markers for Identification of Taioba and Taro, Two Forgotten Human Foods

by
María Del Pilar Sepúlveda-Nieto
1,2,
Fernando Bonifacio-Anacleto
2,
Cairo Faleiros de Figueiredo
2,
Rômulo M. De Moraes-Filho
2,3 and
Ana Lilia Alzate-Marin
2,*
1
Centro de Estudios e Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Biotecnologia Universidad del Quindío-CIBUQ, Armenia Q 630004, Colombia
2
Laboratório de Genética Vegetal, Programa de Pós-graduação do departamento de Genética da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (FMRP-USP/RP), Ribeirão Preto, SP 14049-900, Brazil
3
Programa de Pós-graduação em Melhoramento Genético de Plantas, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), Recife, PE 52171-900, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2017, 3(4), 49; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae3040049
Submission received: 6 September 2017 / Revised: 5 October 2017 / Accepted: 10 October 2017 / Published: 13 October 2017
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Some tropical species—such as the domesticated Xanthosoma sagittifolium (L.) Schott (Taioba) and Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott (Taro)—have similar phenotypic characteristics, especially in the shape and color of the leaves and petioles which generate uncertainty in their identification for use in human food. This study aimed to analyze the morphological and molecular characteristics of X. sagittifolium and C. esculenta that may help in the popular and scientific identification of these species. The principal morphological characteristics of X. sagittifolium were as follows: leaves with subcoriaceous textures, basal insertion of the petiole, green pseudo-stem in the basal portion with exudate being white and the presence of two collector veins. Distinctive morphological characteristics of C. esculenta were as follows: leaves with velvety textures, peltate insertion of the petiole, pink pseudo-stem in the basal portion with pink exudate and presence of one collector vein. The morphological characteristics that can be used to distinguish Taioba from Taro are the basal petiole insertion of the first, against the petiole insertion near the center of the blade of the latter. Molecular analyses using eight Inter-Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) molecular markers simultaneously showed distinctive fingerprints for each of the species. These results contribute to the proper identification of the species used as a food source.

1. Introduction

The Araceae is a family that consists of 109 genera and approximately 2830 species that are widely distributed, mostly in the tropical, subtropical, and temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere [1]. The Araceae family is divided into several subfamilies based on the variation of habitats, disposition, and leaf morphology, the structure of the inflorescence and pollen, floral morphology, anatomy, and chromosome number [2]. Economically, the genera Alocasia, Colocasia, and Xanthosoma of this family are important due to their ornamental use or for the starch obtained from their corms [1]. The species Xanthosoma sagittigolium (L.) Schott is exclusively of Neotropical origin; however, it has been introduced in many tropical areas and cultivated as a food plant in developing countries, and it is found naturalized in many places. Approximately 400 million people worldwide now consume its leaves or corms as a staple food [3,4]. On the other hand, Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott is a cultivated species native to tropical Asia and naturalized throughout the tropics, and is valued as a rich source of easily digestible protein [3,5].
In Brazil, the leaves of the species X. sagittifolium (taioba) and the rhizomes of C. esculenta (taro), both cultivated by family farmers, are used as food in the states of Minas Gerais and Rio de Janeiro [6]. Despite their importance as an energy-rich food and its increased use, there are only a handful of efforts to market their products in the Americas and West and Central Africa, showing the marginalization of these cultivated species and therefore their status as two neglected crops [3,7]. C. esculenta has been traditionally grown in South and Southeast Asia and the Pacific region as a valuable staple food, where it is commonly known as taro, dasheen, eddoe [5,7], true cocoyam, old cocoyam [8], and poi [9]. X. sagittifolium is referred as yautia and tannia (Caribbean), malanga (Cuba), and cocoyam [9]. In sub-Saharan Africa, both species are known as cocoyam, where their staple root/tuber production ranks third in importance after yam and cassava [7].
There is little information regarding the taxonomy of the above-mentioned cultivated species [3]. Lately, a huge database has been developed aiming at improving the taxonomy of Araceae, including data on chromosome number, morphology, and molecular biology [10]. Molecular studies have been useful in establishing genetic differences between species. One mechanism that has had considerable success in helping to identify different taxa is the use of Inter-Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) markers [11].
X. sagittifolium (Taioba) and C. esculenta (Taro) are popularly mistaken for one another [5,7] because of their similar phenotypic characteristics, especially in the form and color of the leaves and petioles, which create uncertainty when they are collected for use as food by humans. The research hypothesis is that both species have enough morphological and molecular features that will aid in their characterization. Therefore, this study aimed at the following: (1) to analyze the morphological characteristics of X. sagittifolium and C. esculenta (Araceae) taxa and highlight those that allow easy differentiation in the field, (2) to evaluate and identify molecular ISSR markers that may help in the identification of these species, and (3) to compare these two species morphologically and molecularly with two additional taxa, Xanthosoma violaceum Schott and Xanthosoma undipes (K.Koch & C.D.Bouché) K.Koch.

2. Materials and Methods

Samples of X. sagittifolium and C. esculenta species were obtained from urban (1, 8, 11–14), natural (6, 7), and cultivated (2–5) populations from the states of São Paulo and Minas Gerais (Brazil) (Table 1, Figure 1). Sample data included the sample number, location where they were collected, georeferenced data (GPS), and collection date (Table 1). Additionally, X. violaceum and X. undipes species were also collected from two urban populations to compare morphology and the genetic profile to the target species (Figure 1). For molecular analysis, 150 mg of leaf tissue was sampled from each of the 14 specimens and stored at −20 °C. DNA was extracted following the protocol proposed by Alzate-Marin et al. [12].
Subsequently, plants were described morphologically according to Acevedo-Rodriguez and Strong [13] (data not shown) and prepared for herbarium material. The exsiccates were deposited in the reference collection of the Herbarium SPFR University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, with the following labels: C. Faleiros, P. Sepulveda, and F. Bonifacio (Table 1).
For the molecular analyses, 15 ISSR markers were evaluated (UBC 1, 2, 813, 820, 834, 845, 851, 858, 860, 862, 864, 866, 885, 886, 897) according to the official list published by the University of British Columbia in Canada (UCB). The amplification products were separated by electrophoresis on 8% polyacrylamide gel. The results were visualized by staining with silver nitrate according to the protocol of Sanguinetti et al. [14]. Fragments of different mobilities were considered as different alleles. Estimates of the size of the resulting amplification products were performed by comparison with a DNA ladder of 50 base pairs (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). The polymorphism obtained by the ISSR technique was tabulated as binary according to the presence (1) or absence (0) of bands. Each polymorphic ISSR band was considered a biallelic locus, with an amplifiable allele and a null allele. GenAlEx 6.5 software [15] was used to generate a matrix of genetic distances according to Nei [16] and Nei’s genetic diversity (Ĥe). MEGA 5 software [17] was used to generate a dendrogram of genetic similarity based on the UPGMA algorithm.

3. Results and Discussion

X. sagittifolium exhibited white exudate from the vegetative parts (Figure 2A), green pseudostem (Figure 2B), basal petioles (Figure 2C), leaves with a sagittate form (Figure 2D), two collecting veins at the leaf margin (Figure 2E), and subcoriaceus leaf blades. C. esculenta displayed pink or purple exudates from the vegetative parts (Figure 3A), pink pseudostem (Figure 3B), peltate petioles (Figure 3C), velvety leaf blades (Figure 3D), and one collecting vein in the margin of the leaf (Figure 3E).
Insertion of the petiole and the purple underside of the leaf blade, the leaves with revolute margins, purple petioles, and markedly subtriangular basal lobes were characteristics of X. violaceum (Figure 1C). Leaves with involute margins, the apex broadly obtuse to mucronate, and green petioles were features of X. undipes (Figure 1D).
For folk taxonomy, the morphological characteristics that can be used to distinguish Xanthosoma from Colocasia species are from the appreciation of the basal petiole insertion of the first (Figure 2C), against the petiole insertion near the center of the blade of the latter (Figure 3C). The results of the molecular analyses with the 15 ISSR markers show that only one primer did not have any amplification products (UBC 813), while eight primers (UBC 2, 834, 845, 851, 858, 860, 864, 866) produced high-resolution profiles that were selected for the next stage (Figure 4A). From these amplifications, 334 loci were obtained, with an average of 41.75 loci, varying between 22 (UBC 866) and 73 (UBC 2) (Table 2). Of these, 321 (96.11%) exhibited polymorphism and 13 (3.89%) were monomorphic. The results indicated an average of 26.52% genetic diversity among the specimens that were analyzed (Table 2).
A UPGMA dendrogram was generated based on a genetic similarity matrix (data not shown) which showed groupings of the different species tested (Figure 4B). The analysis by ISSR molecular markers showed low polymorphism among specimens of X. sagittifolium, which originated from various collection sites, suggesting that these individuals have a common origin, possibly due to vegetative propagation by producers (Table 3). This result can be illustrated by observing specimens 2–3 and 5–8, which came from different localities, (see Table 1, Figure 4A) but showed identical band profiles for all the primers used. Additionally, three specimens of C. esculenta appeared to have higher polymorphism than the nine specimens of species X. sagittifolium (Table 3). X. undipes exhibited different electrophoretic profiles regarding the other individuals of the same gender. Therefore, it was grouped separately from X. violaceum and X. sagittifolium.
X. sagittifolium and C. esculenta are the most important species of Araceae, with a nutritional value similar to the potato, with exceptional value for food security [3,4,7,18,19]. The usable parts in both species are the subterranean tuberous stems and the young leaves, especially from X. sagittifolium [3,4,19]. While there are numerous reports with different molecular markers for C. esculenta (e.g., [20,21,22,23]), a smaller number were found for X. sagittifolium [24,25,26,27] and for both species [25,27]. In this work, we characterized for the first time eight ISSR markers that can be used simultaneously in the genetic analysis of X. sagittifolium and C. esculenta and other related taxa such as X. violaceum and X. undipes, which can aid in characterization and identification.
C. esculenta has high genetic diversity with diploid and triploid genotypes spread throughout tropical regions [23,28]. As an allogamous and heterozygous species, natural pollination occurs between C. esculenta diploid plants; however, its asexual propagation by farmers generates clonal lineages [23]. Similarly, despite being an outcrossing species, X. sagittifolium is mostly cultivated by vegetative propagation due to the low viability of seeds produced from natural crosses [3]. Thus, our observations on the diversity of these species are according to their reproductive and cultivation characteristics (Table 3).
The morphologic and genetic characterization of X. sagittifolium and C. esculenta generated in this study can contribute to their proper identification in field and germplasm banks in Brazil and other places where these species are used as a food source.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Provost for Research of São Paulo University (Ana Lilia Alzate-Marin) and CAPES-PROEX grants. Maria del Pilar Sepulveda Nieto was supported by Universidad del Quindio (Colombia). Romulo Maciel de Moraes-Filho was supported by a graduate and a post-doctoral fellowship from CAPES, and Fernando Bonifacio-Anacleto was supported by scientific initiation scholarship from CNPq (134699/2012-2). Ana Lilia Alzate-Marin was supported by a research assistantship from CNPq (PV 300140/2011-8).

Author Contributions

All authors have contributed equally towards the research and the writing of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Judd, W.S.; Campbell, C.S.; Kellog, E.A.; Stevens, P.F.; Donoghue, M.J. Plant Systematics: A Phylogenetic Approach, 3rd ed.; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2007; pp. 249–251. [Google Scholar]
  2. Grayun, M.H. Evolution and phylogeny of the Araceae. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 1990, 77, 628–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Giacometti, D.C.; Leon, J. Tannia, Yautia. In Neglected Crops: 1492 from a Different Perspective; Hernando Bermejo, J.E., León, J., Eds.; Plant Production and Protection Series No. 26; Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 1994; pp. 253–258. [Google Scholar]
  4. Onokpise, O.U.; Wutoh, J.G.; Ndzana, X.; Tambong, J.T.; Meboka, M.M.; Sama, A.E.; Nyochemberg, L.; Guecia, A.; Nzietchueng, S.; Wilson, J.G.; et al. Evaluation of Macabo cocoyam germplasm in Cameroon. In Perspectives on New Crops and New Uses; Janick, J., Ed.; ASHS Press: Alexandria, VA, USA, 1999; pp. 394–396. [Google Scholar]
  5. Onwueme, I. Taro Cultivation in Asia and the Pacific; FAO: Bangkok, Thailand, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  6. MAPA—Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Manual de Hortaliças Não-Convencionais; Secretaria de Desenvolvimento Agropecuário e Cooperativismo: Brasília, Brasil, 2010.
  7. Onyeka, J. Status of Cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta and Xanthosoma spp) in West and Central Africa: Production, Household Importance and the Threat from Leaf Blight. Lima (Peru); CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas (RTB): Lima, Peru, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  8. Obidiegwu, J.E.; Kendabie, P.; Obidiegwu, O.; Amadi, C. Towards an Enhanced Breeding in Cocoyam: A Review of Past and Future Research Perspectives. Res. Rev. J. Bot. Sci. 2016, 5, 22–33. [Google Scholar]
  9. O’Hair, S.K. Tropical Root and Tuber Crops. In Advances in New Crops; Janick, J., Simon, J.E., Eds.; Timber Press: Portland, OR, USA, 1990; pp. 424–428. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gonçalves, E.G. The Commonly Cultivated Species of Xanthosoma Schott (Araceae), including Four New Species. Aroideana 2011, 34, 3–23. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zietkiewicz, E.; Rafalski, A.; Labuda, D. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 1994, 20, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Alzate-Marin, A.L.; Guidugli, M.C.; Soriani, H.H.; Martinez, C.A.H.; Mestriner, M.A.A. DNA minipreparation procedure suitable for PCR/SSR and RAPD analyses in tropical forest tree species. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2009, 52, 1217–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Acevedo-Rodriguez, P.; Strong, T.M. Monocotiledons and Gymnosperm of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Island; National Museum of Natural History: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; pp. 30–51. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sanguinetti, C.J.; Dias, E.N.; Simpson, A.J.G. Rapid silver staining and recovery of PCR products separated on polyacrylamide gels. Biotechniques 1994, 17, 914–921. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Peakall, R.; Smouse, P.E. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 2537–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nei, M. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 1972, 106, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tamura, K.; Peterson, D.; Peterson, N.; Stecher, G.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S.; Nei, M.; Anil, S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 2731–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lebot, V. Tropical Root and Tuber Crops: Cassava, Sweet Potato, Yams, Aroids; Crop Production Science in Horticulture, 17; CABI: Oxfordshire, UK, 2009; p. 432. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wada, E.; Asfaw, Z.; Feyissa, T.; Tesfaye, K. Farmers’ perception of agromorphological traits and uses of cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium (L.) Schott) grown in Ethiopia. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2017, 12, 2681–2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ochiai, T.; Nguyen, V.X.; Tahara, M.; Yoshino, H. Geographical differentiation of Asian taro, Colacasia esculenta (L.) Schott, detected by RAPD and isozyme analyses. Euphytica 2001, 122, 219–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Matthews, P.J. Genetic Diversity in Taro, and the Preservation of Culinary Knowledge. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 2004, 2, 55–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Singh, S.; Singh, D.R.; Faseela, F.; Kumar, N.; Damodaran, V.; Srivastava, R.C. Diversity of 21 taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) accessions of Andaman Islands. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2012, 59, 821–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chaïr, H.; Traore, R.E.; Duval, M.F.; Rivallan, R.; Mukherjee, A.; Aboagye, L.M.; van Rensburg, W.J.; Andrianavalona, V.; de Carvalho, M.A.A.P.; Saborio, F.; et al. Genetic Diversification and Dispersal of Taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Offei, S.K.; Asante, I.K.; Danquah, E.Y. Genetic structure of seventy cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium, Linn, Schott) accessions in Ghana based on RAPD. Hereditas 2004, 140, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Osawaru, M.E.; Ogwu, M.C. Molecular Characterization of 36 Accessions of Two Genera of Cocoyam (Colocasia [Schott] and Xanthosoma [Schott], Araceae). Sci. Technol. Arts Res. J. 2015, 4, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cathebras, C.; Traore, R.; Malapa, R.; Risterucci, A.M.; Chaïr, H. Characterization of microsatellites in Xanthosoma sagittifolium (Araceae) and cross-amplification in related species. Appl. Plant Sci. 2014, 2, 1400027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Doungous, O.; Kalendar, R.; Adiobo, A.; Schulman, A.H. Retrotransposon molecular markers resolve cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) and taro (Colocasia esculenta) by type and variety. Euphytica 2015, 206, 541–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Coates, D.J.; Yen, D.E.; Gaffey, P.M. Chromosome variation in taro, Colocasia esculenta: Implications for origin in the Pacific. Cytologia 1988, 53, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Horticulturae 03 00049 g001 550
Figure 1. Images of populations of X. sagittifolium (A), C. esculenta (B), X. violaceum (C), and X. undipes (D), which correspond to samples 11, 12, 10 and 9, respectively (Source: Laboratory of Plant Genetics/University of São Paulo, Campus of Ribeirão Preto, Brazil).
Figure 1. Images of populations of X. sagittifolium (A), C. esculenta (B), X. violaceum (C), and X. undipes (D), which correspond to samples 11, 12, 10 and 9, respectively (Source: Laboratory of Plant Genetics/University of São Paulo, Campus of Ribeirão Preto, Brazil).
Horticulturae 03 00049 g001
Horticulturae 03 00049 g002 550
Figure 2. Images of X. sagittifolium. (A) The white color of exudate in stem (arrow); (B) The green color of the pseudostem (arrow); (C) The basal insertion of the petiole in leaf (arrow); (D) The upper leaf and its sagittate form; (E) The two collecting veins at the leaf margin (arrow) (Source: Laboratory of Plant Genetics/University of São Paulo, Campus of Ribeirão Preto, Brazil).
Figure 2. Images of X. sagittifolium. (A) The white color of exudate in stem (arrow); (B) The green color of the pseudostem (arrow); (C) The basal insertion of the petiole in leaf (arrow); (D) The upper leaf and its sagittate form; (E) The two collecting veins at the leaf margin (arrow) (Source: Laboratory of Plant Genetics/University of São Paulo, Campus of Ribeirão Preto, Brazil).
Horticulturae 03 00049 g002
Horticulturae 03 00049 g003 550
Figure 3. Images of C. esculenta. (A) The pink color of exudate in stem (arrow); (B) The pink color of the pseudostem (arrow); (C) The position of the petiole near the center of the leaf blade (arrow); (D) The upper leaf with a velvety texture; (E) the collecting vein (arrow). (Source: Laboratory of Plant Genetics/University of São Paulo, Campus of Ribeirão Preto, Brazil).
Figure 3. Images of C. esculenta. (A) The pink color of exudate in stem (arrow); (B) The pink color of the pseudostem (arrow); (C) The position of the petiole near the center of the leaf blade (arrow); (D) The upper leaf with a velvety texture; (E) the collecting vein (arrow). (Source: Laboratory of Plant Genetics/University of São Paulo, Campus of Ribeirão Preto, Brazil).
Horticulturae 03 00049 g003
Horticulturae 03 00049 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) Non-denatured polyacrylamide gel (8%) showing the amplification products related to the ISSR UBC2. The distinctive fingerprint of each species studied is shown. Column M corresponds to a molecular weight marker (GE Healthcare 50 pb). Lanes 1–5, 8–14, and 11 (amplified in duplicate) correspond to the taxon X. sagittifolium; channel 9 corresponds to X. undipes (amplified in duplicate), channel 10 corresponds to X. violaceum (amplified in duplicate). Lanes 6, 7, and 12 correspond to C. esculenta. (Source: Laboratory of Plant Genetics/University of São Paulo, Campus of Ribeirão Preto, Brazil); (B) Dendrogram based on the UPGMA algorithm showing the genetic similarity of the specimens of the four analyzed species.
Figure 4. (A) Non-denatured polyacrylamide gel (8%) showing the amplification products related to the ISSR UBC2. The distinctive fingerprint of each species studied is shown. Column M corresponds to a molecular weight marker (GE Healthcare 50 pb). Lanes 1–5, 8–14, and 11 (amplified in duplicate) correspond to the taxon X. sagittifolium; channel 9 corresponds to X. undipes (amplified in duplicate), channel 10 corresponds to X. violaceum (amplified in duplicate). Lanes 6, 7, and 12 correspond to C. esculenta. (Source: Laboratory of Plant Genetics/University of São Paulo, Campus of Ribeirão Preto, Brazil); (B) Dendrogram based on the UPGMA algorithm showing the genetic similarity of the specimens of the four analyzed species.
Horticulturae 03 00049 g004
Table
Table 1. Data of specimens studied.
Table 1. Data of specimens studied.
No.DescriptionHerbarium SampleGPSLocal/BrazilCollection Date
1X. sagittifoliumC. Faleiros 30720°33′21.38″ S
47°23′56.08″ O		Franca/SP28/05/2013
2X. sagittifoliumC. Faleiros 30820°34′13.91″ S
47° 20′29.29″ O		Abaeté-Franca/SP03/06/2013
3X. sagittifolium-20°34′13.91″ S
47° 20′29.29″ O		Abaeté-Franca/SP03/06/2013
4X. sagittifoliumC. Faleiros 30920°37′29.86″ S
47°10′54.44″ O		Itirapua/SP04/06/2013
5X. sagittifolium-20°37′29.86″ S
47° 10′54.44″ O		Itirapua/SP04/06/2013
6C. esculenta-20°37′16.58″ S
47°04′27.15″ O		Capetinga/MG04/06/2013
7C. esculentaC. Faleiros 31020°37′16.58″ S
47°04′27.15″ O		Capetinga/MG04/06/2013
8X. sagittifoliumSepúlveda P. 75221°15′03.13″ S
47°15′58.28″ O		Ribeirão Preto/SP16/06/2013
9X. undipes-21°09′54.85″ S
47°51′40.54″ O		USP-Ribeirão Preto/SP17/06/2013
10X. violaceumSepúlveda P. 74921°09′54.85″ S
47°51′40.54″ O		USP-Ribeirão Preto/SP17/06/2013
11X. sagittifoliumF. Bonifacio 11020°53′39.78″ S
47°00′41.97″ O		São Sebastião do Paraíso/ MG16/06/2013
12C. esculenta-20°53′42.14″ S
47°00′28.10″ O		São Sebastião do Paraíso /MG16/06/2013
13X. sagittifolium-20°53′50.14″S
47°00′26.73″ O		São Sebastião do Paraíso/ MG16/06/2013
14X. sagittifoliumF. Bonifacio 11120°53′51.83″ S
47°00′16.09″ O		São Sebastião do Paraíso/MG16/06/2013
Table
Table 2. Characteristics and sequences of the inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) primers used in the genetic analysis of specimens of four species of Araceae. PL = polymorphic loci, ML = monomorphic loci. Ĥe = Nei Genetic Diversity. R = (A,G), Y = (C,T).
Table 2. Characteristics and sequences of the inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) primers used in the genetic analysis of specimens of four species of Araceae. PL = polymorphic loci, ML = monomorphic loci. Ĥe = Nei Genetic Diversity. R = (A,G), Y = (C,T).
PrimerSequence 5′–3′N° of LociPLMLĤe
UBC#2GAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAT736850.305
UBC#834AGAAGAAGAGAGAGAGYT474700.270
UBC#845CTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTRG363600.237
UBC#851GTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTYG373610.301
UBC#858TGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGRT373610.244
UBC#860TGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGRA494540.240
UBC#864ATGATGATGATGATGATG343310.266
UBC#866CTCCTCCTCCTCCTCCTC222110.259
Total 334321 (96,11%)13 (3.89%)-
Average 0.2652
Table
Table 3. Genetic diversity of specimens of X. sagittifolium and C. esculenta analyzed using ISSR molecular markers.
Table 3. Genetic diversity of specimens of X. sagittifolium and C. esculenta analyzed using ISSR molecular markers.
SpeciesNPLPPL (%)Ĥe
X. sagittifolium9144.190.014
C. esculenta38625.740.109
N = number of specimens, PL = number of polymorphic loci, PPL (%) = percent of polymorphic loci, Ĥe = Nei Genetic Diversity.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sepúlveda-Nieto, M.D.P.; Bonifacio-Anacleto, F.; Faleiros de Figueiredo, C.; De Moraes-Filho, R.M.; Alzate-Marin, A.L. Accessible Morphological and Genetic Markers for Identification of Taioba and Taro, Two Forgotten Human Foods. Horticulturae 2017, 3, 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae3040049

AMA Style

Sepúlveda-Nieto MDP, Bonifacio-Anacleto F, Faleiros de Figueiredo C, De Moraes-Filho RM, Alzate-Marin AL. Accessible Morphological and Genetic Markers for Identification of Taioba and Taro, Two Forgotten Human Foods. Horticulturae. 2017; 3(4):49. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae3040049

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sepúlveda-Nieto, María Del Pilar, Fernando Bonifacio-Anacleto, Cairo Faleiros de Figueiredo, Rômulo M. De Moraes-Filho, and Ana Lilia Alzate-Marin. 2017. "Accessible Morphological and Genetic Markers for Identification of Taioba and Taro, Two Forgotten Human Foods" Horticulturae 3, no. 4: 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae3040049

APA Style

Sepúlveda-Nieto, M. D. P., Bonifacio-Anacleto, F., Faleiros de Figueiredo, C., De Moraes-Filho, R. M., & Alzate-Marin, A. L. (2017). Accessible Morphological and Genetic Markers for Identification of Taioba and Taro, Two Forgotten Human Foods. Horticulturae, 3(4), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae3040049

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop