Study of the Impact of Different Irrigation Regimes on the Quality Attributes and Phenolic Compounds Profile of Selected Goji Berry Varieties (Lycium barbarum L.) Cultivated Under an Organic Cultivation System in Southwestern Spain
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Morphological Parameters
2.2. Moisture Content, Titratable Acidity (TA), pH, and Total Soluble Solids (TSSs)
2.3. Color
2.4. Texture Analyses
2.5. Phenolic Compound Profile
2.6. Antioxidant Activity
2.7. Pearson Correlation Analysis
2.8. Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA)
2.9. Integrated Quality Assessment Framework for Goji Irrigation Management (IQAF)
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Chemicals
3.2. Material and Sample Collection
3.3. Morphological Measurements
3.4. Moisture Content
3.5. Titratable Acidity (TA), pH, and Total Soluble Solids (TSSs)
3.6. Color
3.7. Evaluation of Texture Properties
3.8. Extraction of Phenolic Compounds
3.9. Antioxidant Activity
3.9.1. ABTS Radical Scavenging Assay
3.9.2. DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay
3.9.3. Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC) Assay
3.10. Phenolic Compounds Profile
3.11. Statistical Analysis
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Vidovic, B.B.; Milincic, D.D.; Kostic, A.Ž.; Pešic, M.B.; Marcetic, M.D.; Djuriš, J.D.; Ilic, T.D. Health Benefits and Applications of Goji Berries in Functional Food Products Development: A Review. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- García-Garrido, M.E.; Sánchez-Parra, M.; Ordóñez-Díaz, J.L.; Moreno-Rojas, J.M. Evaluation of Morphological, Chemical, and Antioxidant Characteristics, and Phenolic Profile of Three Goji Berry Varieties Cultivated in Southwestern Spain. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 11999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- González-Chavira, M.M.; Herrera-Hernández, M.G.; Guzmán-Maldonado, H.; Pons-Hernández, J.L. Scientia Horticulturae Controlled Water Deficit as Abiotic Stress Factor for Enhancing the Phytochemical Content and Adding-Value of Crops. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 234, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Breniere, T.; Fanciullino, A.; Bertin, N.; Borel, P. Effect of Long-Term de Fi Cit Irrigation on Tomato and Goji Berry Quality: From Fruit Composition to in Vitro Bioaccessibility of Carotenoids. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 1339536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Xue, L. Practical Exploration on the Effect of Different Irrigation Treatments on the Growth of Goji Berries in Yumen Irrigation District, Gansu Province. In Hydraulic and Civil Engineering Technology VIII; Yang, M., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2023; pp. 1452–1458. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, J.; Yu, Y.; Lei, J.; Liu, J. Multi-Objective Lower Irrigation Limit Simulation and Optimization Model for Lycium barbarum Based on NSGA-III. Water 2023, 15, 783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kader, A.A. Flavor Quality of Fruits and Vegetables. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008, 88, 1863–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Česonienė, L.; Daubaras, R.; Viškelis, P.; Šarkinas, A. Determination of the Total Phenolic and Anthocyanin Contents and Antimicrobial Activity of Viburnum opulus Fruit Juice. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2012, 67, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Y.; Wan, R.; Shi, Z.; Yang, L.; Fang, S. Phenotypic and Phytochemical Variations in Wolfberry Varieties and Their Harvest Times. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ciacciulli, A.; Chiozzotto, R.; Attanasio, G.; Cirilli, M.; Bassi, D. Identification of a Melting Type Variant among Peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) Fruit Textures by a Digital Penetrometer. J. Texture Stud. 2018, 49, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Alikhani-Koupaei, M.; Fatahi, R.; Zamani, Z.; Salimi, S. Effects of Deficit Irrigation on Some Physiological Traits, Production and Fruit Quality of ‘Mazafati’ Date Palm and the Fruit Wilting and Dropping Disorder. Agric. Water Manag. 2018, 209, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Teixeira, F.; Silva, A.M.; Delerue-Matos, C.; Rodrigues, F. Lycium barbarum Berries (Solanaceae) as Source of Bioactive Compounds for Healthy Purposes: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Donno, D.; Beccaro, G.L.; Mellano, M.G.; Cerutti, A.K.; Bounous, G. Goji Berry Fruit (Lycium spp.): Antioxidant Compound Fingerprint and Bioactivity Evaluation. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 18, 1070–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhao, W.H.; Shi, Y.P. Comprehensive Analysis of Phenolic Compounds in Four Varieties of Goji Berries at Different Ripening Stages by UPLC–MS/MS. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2022, 106, 104279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Milinčić, D.D.; Vidović, B.B.; Gašić, U.M.; Milenković, M.; Kostić, A.; Stanojević, S.P.; Ilić, T.; Pešić, M.B. A Systematic UHPLC Q-ToF MS Approach for the Characterization of Bioactive Compounds from Freeze-Dried Red Goji Berries (L. barbarum L.) Grown in Serbia: Phenolic Compounds and Phenylamides. Food Chem. 2024, 456, 140044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Jurikova, T.; Tinakova, S.M.; Ziarovska, J.; Szekeres, L.; Mlcek, J.; Fatrcova-Sramkova, K.; Knazicka, Z.; Skrovankova, S. Polyphenolic Spectrum of Goji Berries and Their Health-Promoting Activity. Foods 2025, 14, 1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Shi, X.; Wang, X.; Zheng, Y. Advances in the Study of Bioactive Compounds and Nutraceutical Properties of Goji Berry (Lycium barbarum L.). Food Chem. 2025, 470, 262. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, R.H.; Zhang, X.X.; Ni, Z.J.; Thakur, K.; Wang, W.; Yan, Y.M.; Cao, Y.L.; Zhang, J.G.; Rengasamy, K.R.R.; Wei, Z.J. Lycium barbarum (Goji) as Functional Food: A Review of Its Nutrition, Phytochemical Structure, Biological Features, and Food Industry Prospects. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 10621–10635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ninkuu, V.; Aluko, O.O.; Yan, J.; Zeng, H.; Liu, G.; Zhao, J.; Li, H.; Chen, S.; Dakora, F.D. Phenylpropanoids Metabolism: Recent Insight into Stress Tolerance and Plant Development Cues. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1571825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Fonseca, D.; Sánchez-Gómez, R.; Salinas, M.R.; Jo, M.; Martins, N.; Garcia, R.; Cebrián-Tarancón, C. Irrigation Regime Effects on Phenolic Composition of Portuguese Grape Varieties. Molecules 2025, 30, 3408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Oh, M.; Carey, E.E. Regulated Water Deficits Improve Phytochemical Concentration in Lettuce. HortScience 2010, 45, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bellot, M.J.G.; Parra, C.J.G.A.; Ortuño, F.V.M.F. Influence of Drought Stress on Increasing Bioactive Compounds of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Juice. Exploratory Study Using LC–MS-Based Untargeted Metabolomics Approach. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2023, 249, 2947–2956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bowles, D.; Lim, E.; Poppenberger, B.; Vaistij, E. Glycosyltransferases of Lipophilic Small Molecules. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 567–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Vogt, T. Phenylpropanoid Biosynthesis. Mol. Plant 2010, 3, 2–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Navarro, J.M.; Flores, P.; Garrido, C.; Martinez, V. Changes in the Contents of Antioxidant Compounds in Pepper Fruits at Different Ripening Stage, as Affected by Salinity. Food Chem. 2006, 96, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mao, Y.; Luo, J.; Cai, Z. Biosynthesis and Regulatory Mechanisms of Plant Flavonoids: A Review. Plants 2025, 14, 1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Liu, X.; Wang, C.; Xu, Q.; Zhao, D.; Liu, F.; Han, B. Metabolic Response of the Lycium barbarum Variety ‘Ningqi No. 7′ to Drought Stress. Plants 2024, 13, 1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Inbaraj, B.S.; Lu, H.; Kao, T.H.; Chen, B.H. Simultaneous Determination of Phenolic Acids and Flavonoids in Lycium barbarum Linnaeus by HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2010, 51, 549–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Heim, K.E.; Tagliaferro, A.R.; Bobilya, D.J. Flavonoid Antioxidants: Chemistry, Metabolism and Structure-Activity Relationships. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2002, 13, 572–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhang, K.; Zhou, J.; Song, P.; Li, X.; Peng, X.; Huang, Y.; Ma, Q.; Liang, D. Dynamic Changes of Phenolic Composition, Antioxidant Capacity, and Gene Expression in ‘Snow White’ Loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.) Fruit throughout Development and Ripening. Food Chem. 2024, 430, 137061. [Google Scholar]
- AOAC International. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 18th ed.; Determination of Moisture, Ash, Protein and Fat; AOAC International: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez-Parra, M.; Lopez, A.; Pérez-Aparicio, J.; Moreno-Rojas, J.M.; Ordóñez-Díaz, J.L. Quality and Safety Assessment of Vacuum-Packed Dry-Cured Tuna under Refrigerated Storage Conditions. Food Chem. 2025, 496, 146654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Giongo, L.; Poncetta, P.; Loretti, P.; Costa, F. Texture Profiling of Blueberries (Vaccinium spp.) during Fruit Development, Ripening and Storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2013, 76, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Silva, J.L.; Marroquin, E.; Matta, F.B.; Garner, J.O.; Stojanovic, J. Physicochemical, Carbohydrate and Sensory Characteristics of Highbush and Rabbiteye Blueberry Cultivars. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2005, 85, 1815–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Christofi, M.; Mourtzinos, I.; Lazaridou, A.; Drogoudi, P.; Tsitlakidou, P.; Biliaderis, C.G.; Manganaris, G.A. Elaboration of Novel and Comprehensive Protocols toward Determination of Textural Properties and Other Sensorial Attributes of Canning Peach Fruit. J. Texture Stud. 2021, 52, 228–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Gulcin, İ.; Alwasel, S.H. DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay. Processes 2023, 11, 2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ordóñez-Díaz, J.L.; Velasco-Ruiz, I.; Velasco-Tejero, C.; Pereira-Caro, G.; Moreno-Rojas, J.M. Seasonal and Morphology Effects on Bioactive Compounds, Antioxidant Capacity, and Sugars Profile of Black Carrot (Daucus carota sssp. sativus var. atrorubens Alef.). Foods 2024, 13, 1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Huang, D.; Ou, B.; Hampsch-Woodill, M.; Flanagan, J.A.; Prior, R.L. High-Throughput Assay of Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC) Using a Multichannel Liquid Handling System Coupled with a Microplate Fluorescence Reader in 96-Well Format. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 4437–4444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Tuárez-García, D.A.; Galván-Gámez, H.; Erazo Solórzano, C.Y.; Edison Zambrano, C.; Rodríguez-Solana, R.; Pereira-Caro, G.; Sánchez-Parra, M.; Moreno-Rojas, J.M.; Ordóñez-Díaz, J.L. Effects of Different Heating Treatments on the Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Compounds of Ecuadorian Red Dacca Banana. Plants 2023, 12, 2780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]






| Varieties | Irrigation Regimes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NQ1 | Sweet Lifeberry | Turgidus | p-Value | 100% ETc | 75% ETc | p-Value | |
| Weight 1 | 5.6 b | 6.6 ab | 7.1 a | ** | 6.5 | 6.3 | ns |
| Width (mm) | 7.1 b | 7.8 a | 7.9 a | *** | 7.5 | 7.6 | ns |
| Length (mm) | 12 b | 13 a | 13 a | *** | 13 | 13 | ns |
| Moisture | 81 a | 79 ab | 78 b | * | 79 | 79 | ns |
| TTA 2 | 1.19 | 1.20 | 1.20 | ns | 1.20 | 1.20 | ns |
| pH | 5.2 b | 5.1 b | 5.4 a | ** | 5.2 | 5.2 | ns |
| TSS 3 | 15 b | 14 b | 18 a | *** | 16 | 16 | ns |
| L | 42 b | 42 b | 44 a | ** | 43 | 43 | ns |
| a* | 37 | 37 | 38 | ns | 38 | 38 | ns |
| b* | 27 b | 26 b | 30 a | *** | 28 | 28 | ns |
| Varieties | Irrigation Regimes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NQ1 | Sweet Lifeberry | Turgidus | p-Value | 100% ETc | 75% ETc | p-Value | |
| Texture analysis profile (TPA) | |||||||
| Hardness (N) | 4.8 a | 5.4 a | 2.4 b | *** | 3.6 | 4.3 | ns |
| Springiness (N/mm) | 0.65 b | 0.66 ab | 0.78 a | * | 0.72 | 0.69 | ns |
| Cohesiveness (N/mm) | 0.26 b | 0.25 b | 0.37 a | ** | 0.30 | 0.30 | ns |
| Chewiness (N) | 0.79 | 0.91 | 0.64 | ns | 0.75 | 0.76 | ns |
| Mini Kramer/Ottawa sensor | |||||||
| Maximum force (N) | 21 | 23 | 15 | ns | 18 | 19 | ns |
| Shear force (N/g of sample) | 170 a | 165 a | 98 b | *** | 136 | 143 | ns |
| Varieties | Irrigation Regimes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NQ1 | Sweet Lifeberry | Turgidus | p-Value | 100% ETc | 75% ETc | p-Value | |
| Total hydroxycinnamic acid | 7.5 b | 9.0 a | 7.7 b | *** | 7.9 b | 8.3 a | ** |
| Caffeoyl dihexoside | 0.21 b | 0.22 a | 0.12 c | *** | 0.16 b | 0.21 a | *** |
| Caffeoyl hexoside I | 0.18 b | 0.21 a | 0.16 c | *** | 0.15 b | 0.21 a | *** |
| 2′-Hydroxycinnamic acid (o-coumaric acid) | 0.025 c | 0.114 a | 0.060 b | *** | 0.037 b | 0.096 a | *** |
| 4′-Hydroxycinnamic acid (p-coumaric acid) | 0.042 c | 0.098 a | 0.052 b | *** | 0.040 b | 0.088 a | *** |
| Caffeoyl hexoside II | 0.49 b | 0.53 a | 0.41 c | *** | 0.45 b | 0.50 a | *** |
| Coumaric acid glucoside | 0.18 c | 0.58 a | 0.27 b | *** | 0.20 b | 0.48 a | *** |
| Chlorogenic acid | 0.65 b | 1.12 a | 0.57 c | *** | 0.73 b | 0.83 a | ** |
| Ferulic acid hexoside | 2.9 a | 2.7 b | 2.9 a | *** | 2.7 b | 3.0 a | *** |
| Caffeoyl hexoside III | 0.14 b | 0.16 a | 0.13 b | *** | 0.15 | 0.14 | ns |
| Sinapic acid-O-hexoside | 0.86 b | 0.98 a | 0.59 c | *** | 0.81 | 0.80 | ns |
| Caffeoylquinic acid | 0.26 b | 0.62 a | 0.22 c | *** | 0.45 a | 0.28 b | *** |
| Caffeic acid (3′,4′-Dihydroxycinnamic acid) | 0.065 a | 0.068 a | 0.051 b | *** | 0.058 b | 0.064 a | *** |
| Sinapic acid | 0.089 a | 0.095 a | 0.060 b | *** | 0.084 a | 0.079 b | * |
| 3′-Hydroxycinnamic acid (m-coumaric acid) | 0.17 c | 0.26 b | 0.36 a | *** | 0.27 | 0.26 | ns |
| Ferulic acid | 1.02 b | 1.02 b | 1.25 a | *** | 1.22 a | 0.98 b | *** |
| Isoferulic acid | 0.29 b | 0.26 c | 0.50 a | *** | 0.40 a | 0.30 b | *** |
| Total hydroxybenzoic acid | 8.5 a | 8.7 a | 5.1 b | *** | 6.9 b | 7.9 a | *** |
| Hydroxybenzoic acid hexoside | 2.05 b | 2.61 a | 0.57 c | *** | 1.45 b | 2.04 a | *** |
| 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid | 0.48 b | 0.51 a | 0.37 c | *** | 0.46 a | 0.44 b | * |
| 3-galloyl-gallic acid | 3.9 a | 3.6 b | 2.4 c | *** | 3.1 b | 3.4 a | *** |
| 3-Hydroxybenzoic acid | 0.56 a | 0.39 b | 0.29 b | *** | 0.33 b | 0.50 a | *** |
| Mono-galloyl-glucose | 0.90 ab | 1.08 a | 0.72 b | ** | 0.88 | 0.92 | ns |
| Vanillic acid (4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzoic acid) | 0.62 b | 0.56 b | 0.79 a | *** | 0.71 a | 0.60 b | *** |
| Total flavonols | 14 a | 10 c | 11 b | *** | 13 a | 11 b | *** |
| Quercetin trihexoside | 0.60 a | 0.47 b | 0.29 c | *** | 0.46 | 0.45 | ns |
| Quercetin-3-O-rutinose-7-O-glucoside | 0.066 b | 0.095 b | 0.225 a | *** | 0.157 a | 0.102 b | *** |
| Quercetin dihexoside | 10.4 a | 7.0 b | 5.3 c | *** | 7.8 a | 7.3 b | ** |
| Rutin isomer | 0.115 a | 0.110 a | 0.081 b | *** | 0.096 b | 0.108 a | ** |
| Rutin | 1.56 b | 1.62 b | 4.53 a | *** | 3.25 a | 1.89 b | *** |
| Laricitrin 3-rutinoside | 0.75 a | 0.66 b | 0.24 c | *** | 0.51 b | 0.59 a | *** |
| Kaempferol 3-rutinoside | 0.16 c | 0.28 a | 0.22 b | *** | 0.20 b | 0.24 a | ** |
| Quercetin | 0.151 b | 0.119 c | 0.253 a | *** | 0.178 | 0.170 | ns |
| Total flavan-3-ols | 1.14 b | 0.61 c | 2.37 a | *** | 1.85 a | 0.89 b | *** |
| (+)-Catechin | 1.14 b | 0.61 c | 2.37 a | *** | 1.85 a | 0.89 b | *** |
| Total phenolic compounds | 31 a | 29 b | 26 c | *** | 29 a | 28 b | ** |
| Varieties | Irrigation Regimes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NQ1 | Sweet Lifeberry | Turgidus | p-Value | 100% ETc | 75% ETc | p-Value | |
| ABTS | 1.05 a | 0.90 b | 0.85 b | *** | 1.01 a | 0.86 b | *** |
| DPPH | 1.05 a | 0.91 b | 0.90 b | *** | 1.00 a | 0.90 b | *** |
| ORAC | 35 a | 28 b | 27 b | *** | 32 a | 28 b | ** |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
García-Garrido, M.E.; Sánchez-Parra, M.; Moreno-Rojas, J.M.; Ordóñez-Díaz, J.L. Study of the Impact of Different Irrigation Regimes on the Quality Attributes and Phenolic Compounds Profile of Selected Goji Berry Varieties (Lycium barbarum L.) Cultivated Under an Organic Cultivation System in Southwestern Spain. Horticulturae 2026, 12, 852. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12070852
García-Garrido ME, Sánchez-Parra M, Moreno-Rojas JM, Ordóñez-Díaz JL. Study of the Impact of Different Irrigation Regimes on the Quality Attributes and Phenolic Compounds Profile of Selected Goji Berry Varieties (Lycium barbarum L.) Cultivated Under an Organic Cultivation System in Southwestern Spain. Horticulturae. 2026; 12(7):852. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12070852
Chicago/Turabian StyleGarcía-Garrido, María Elena, Mónica Sánchez-Parra, José Manuel Moreno-Rojas, and José Luis Ordóñez-Díaz. 2026. "Study of the Impact of Different Irrigation Regimes on the Quality Attributes and Phenolic Compounds Profile of Selected Goji Berry Varieties (Lycium barbarum L.) Cultivated Under an Organic Cultivation System in Southwestern Spain" Horticulturae 12, no. 7: 852. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12070852
APA StyleGarcía-Garrido, M. E., Sánchez-Parra, M., Moreno-Rojas, J. M., & Ordóñez-Díaz, J. L. (2026). Study of the Impact of Different Irrigation Regimes on the Quality Attributes and Phenolic Compounds Profile of Selected Goji Berry Varieties (Lycium barbarum L.) Cultivated Under an Organic Cultivation System in Southwestern Spain. Horticulturae, 12(7), 852. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12070852

