Next Article in Journal
Mycorrhizas Promote Total Flavonoid Levels in Trifoliate Orange by Accelerating the Flavonoid Biosynthetic Pathway to Reduce Oxidative Damage Under Drought
Previous Article in Journal
Curcuma nivea (Zingiberaceae), a New Compact Species with Horticultural Potential from Eastern Thailand
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrated Transcriptomic and Functional Analyses Reveal the Role of the Plant–Pathogen Interaction Pathway in Fusarium solani Infection of Zingiber officinale
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exogenous 24-Epibrassinolide Alleviated Selenium Stress in Peach Seedling

1
College of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
2
School of Agriculture and Horticulture, Chengdu Agriculturall College, Chengdu 611130, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2025, 11(8), 909; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11080909 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 6 June 2025 / Revised: 30 July 2025 / Accepted: 1 August 2025 / Published: 4 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biotic and Abiotic Stress Responses of Horticultural Plants)

Abstract

Selenium stress can adversely affect plants by inhibiting growth, impairing oxidative stress resistance, and inducing toxicity. In this experiment, we investigated the effect of exogenous 24-epibrassinolide (24-EBL; 2.0 mg/L), a brassinosteroid (BR), on alleviating selenium stress in peach trees by analyzing its impact on biomass, selenium accumulation, and the expression of selenium metabolism-related genes in peach seedlings. The results demonstrated that 24-EBL could effectively mitigate biomass loss in peach seedlings exposed to selenium stress. Compared to the Se treatment alone, the 24-EBL+Se treatment resulted in a significant 16.55% increase in root selenium content and a more pronounced 30.39% increase in selenium content in the aboveground parts. Regarding the subcellular distribution, the cell wall was the primary site of Se deposition, accounting for 42.3% and 49.8% in the root and aboveground parts, respectively, in the Se treatment. 24-EBL further enhanced Se distribution at this site, reaching 42.9% and 63.2% in root and aboveground parts, respectively, in the 24-EBL+Se treatment. The 24-EBL+Se treatment significantly increased the contents of different chemical forms of Se, including ethanol-soluble, water-soluble, and salt-soluble Se. The quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) results indicated that the Se treatment promoted the expression of organic Se assimilation genes (SATs, OAS-TL B, and OAS-TL C), and 24-EBL application further increased their expression. Meanwhile, the Se-only treatment up-regulated the organic Se metabolism gene CGS1. Consequently, we propose that 24-EBL alleviates Se stress in peach seedlings by enhancing Se uptake and assimilation, and by adjusting subcellular distribution and chemical forms.

1. Introduction

Selenium is an essential trace element for human health, but the human body cannot synthesize it and must obtain it from external sources [1,2]. However, naturally occurring selenium cannot be directly absorbed or utilized by humans. Plants serve as a critical intermediary in selenium metabolism by absorbing inorganic selenium from the soil and converting it into bioavailable organic forms [3]. As a result, crops, fruits, and vegetables are ideal dietary sources of selenium, constituting the primary route of human selenium intake [4]. This has led to the widespread use of selenium-enriched fertilizers in agriculture to enhance the selenium content of food products [5].
However, excessive application of selenium fertilizers in agriculture can lead to environmental selenium pollution, posing risks to human health, disrupting ecosystems, and harming agricultural productivity [5]. For example, an intake of >400 μg/day is generally considered the threshold for toxic levels for humans [6,7]. The widespread use of selenium-enriched fertilizers may result in the gradual accumulation of selenium in soil and groundwater [8]. Elevated selenium levels can adversely affect plants by inhibiting growth, impairing oxidative stress resistance, and inducing toxicity [9]. Specifically, it disrupts root physiology, damages antioxidants, suppresses antioxidant enzyme activity, and destabilizes the plant’s antioxidant defense system [9,10].
Selenium induces stress in plants through multiple mechanisms. The bioavailable forms of selenium for plant uptake in soil are primarily inorganic selenate (SeO42−) and selenite (SeO32−) [11]. These inorganic selenium species induce oxidative stress by generating excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS), disrupting intracellular antioxidant defenses, and causing phytotoxicity [12]. Furthermore, selenite is readily assimilated into organic forms. Excessive accumulation of organic selenium compounds, particularly selenocysteine (SeCys) and selenomethionine (SeMet), can lead to nonspecific incorporation into proteins, where they displace their sulfur (S) analogues. This substitution alters protein structure, impairs functionality, and disrupts enzymatic processes critical for plant metabolism [13].
Brassinosteroids (BRs) are a class of ubiquitous plant sterol hormones. They can enhance plant stress resistance by boosting antioxidant enzyme activity, optimizing antioxidant systems, and maintaining intracellular homeostasis [14,15]. These properties of BRs enable plants to tolerate various abiotic stresses such as extreme temperatures, salinity, drought, heavy metals, and pesticides [16]. Specifically, BRs have been shown to strengthen antioxidant defense systems in rice (Oryza sativa) under heavy metal (cadmium; Cd) stress [17] and reduce Cd and also phenanthrene (PAH) accumulation in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) leaves and roots [18]. Recent studies demonstrated that synthesized BR (24-epibrassinolide; 24-EBL) alleviated zinc (Zn) stress in mung bean (Vigna radiata) seedlings, significantly improving germination rate, germination velocity, and seedling vigor index [19]. Our previous work also demonstrated the alleviating effect of 24-epibrassinolide on Se toxicity [20,21]. However, the metabolic mechanisms by which 24-EBL alleviates Se-induced stress in plants remain unclear.
Peach fruit has gained global popularity due to its delightful taste and nutritional benefits. As the foundation for nutrient absorption in peach trees, rootstock selection is crucial for cultivation. Fluffy peach (“MaoTao”), a native Chinese germplasm, serves as one of the most widely used rootstocks in peach production regions of China. This study investigated the potential of BRs to mitigate selenium stress in peach plants using fluffy peach seedlings as experimental material. We examined the effects of exogenous 24-EBL application on plant biomass and total selenium accumulation, subcellular selenium distribution patterns, chemical forms of selenium, and expression profiles of selenium metabolism-related genes. Our findings provide valuable insights into using 24-EBL as a potential treatment for enhancing plant tolerance to selenium stress, offering practical references for peach cultivation under selenium-rich conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Growth Condition

Fluffy peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) seeds were obtained from Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China. The experiment was conducted from March to May 2024 in the greenhouse of Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu Campus (30°43′N, 103°52′E), with day/night temperatures maintained at 25/20 °C, relative humidity at 70%/90%, and a 14/10 h photoperiod at 10,000 lx intensity. Seeds were germinated in perlite-filled trays under controlled conditions. After emergence, seedlings were irrigated with Hoagland nutrient solution (Betensh, Hubei, China) every 3 days. When seedlings reached 10 cm height, uniform plants were transplanted into 32-cell plug trays (4 × 8 arrangement), containing perlite substrate, continuing with triweekly Hoagland solution irrigation. The Hoagland nutrient solution was pH 6.0. The main nutrient elements in the Hoagland solution were as follows: Ca2+ 23.625 mEq/L, K+ 15.425 mEq/L, NH4+ 2.375 mEq/L, Mg2+ 20.54 mEq/L, NO3− 34.8 mEq/L, and PO43− 1.15 mEq/L. Each treatment was replicated in three trays.

2.2. Experimental Treatments

Ten days post-transplantation, three treatments were initiated: (1) Control (CK) receiving standard Hoagland solution; (2) Selenium treatment (Se) with 0.1 mg/L sodium selenite in Hoagland solution applied every 3 days [22]; and (3) Combined treatment (24-EBL+Se) receiving both the selenium solution and foliar sprays of 2.0 mg/L 24-EBL weekly for 4 weeks [21]. Each treatment included three biological replicates (trays). After one month of treatment, when seedlings reached 32–38 cm height with 21–25 leaves, complete plants (aboveground part and root) were harvested from all treatments for subsequent analysis of growth parameters, selenium content, subcellular distribution, chemical form, and gene expression related to selenium metabolism.

2.3. Plant Biomass Determination

The aboveground parts and roots were washed with tap water, followed by repeated rinsing with deionized water. Plant materials were then deactivated at 105 °C in a drying oven for 15 min and dried to constant weight at 70 °C. The biomass of roots and aboveground parts was measured separately using an electronic balance.

2.4. Total Selenium Content Determination

Dried plant materials were ground and sieved through a 100-mesh sieve. Exactly 0.500 g samples were weighed into Erlenmeyer flasks containing 9 mL concentrated nitric acid (analytical grade) and 1 mL perchloric acid (analytical grade). After 12 h of pre-digestion, samples were digested on an electric hot plate until the solution became transparent. After complete cooling, the solution was diluted to 25 mL with potassium ferricyanide solution (100 g/L). Selenium concentration was determined using an atomic fluorescence spectrometer (AFS-9700, Beijing Haiguang Instrument Co., Ltd., Beijing, China).

2.5. Inorganic Se and Organic Se Contents Determination

Dry plant materials (0.20–0.50 g) were digested with 20 mL 6 mol/L HCl at 70 °C for 2 h in a water bath shaker. After cooling and volume adjustment, the mixture was filtered through degreased cotton. The filtrate was heated in a boiling water bath for 20 min, cooled, and 1 mL was transferred to a 25 mL stoppered colorimetric tube. Following dilution to 10 mL with deionized water, 2 mL concentrated HCl and 1 mL potassium ferricyanide solution (100 g/L) were added to obtain the inorganic Se (Inorg-Se) content. Organic Se (Org-Se) content was calculated as the difference between total Se and inorganic Se. Selenium concentration was determined using an atomic fluorescence spectrometer (AFS-9700, Beijing Haiguang Instrument Co., Ltd., Beijing, China).

2.6. Selenium Content Determination in Plant Subcellular Distribution

Subcellular fractions from peach aboveground parts were extracted by differential centrifugation. Exactly 1.0 g of fresh root tissue was weighed and homogenized in a pre-cooled mortar with extraction buffer (250 mmol/L sucrose, 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], and 1.0 mmol/L dithioerythritol) at a 1:10 (w/v) ratio. The homogenate was filtered through cheesecloth, with the residue washed into a beaker to obtain the cell wall fraction (CW-Se). The filtrate was centrifuged at 20,000× g for 45 min at 4 °C to separate organelle fraction (O-Se, excluding vacuoles) in the pellet from the free fraction (F-Se) in the supernatant. All fractions were analyzed for selenium content by atomic fluorescence spectrometer (AFS-9700, Beijing Haiguang Instrument Co., Ltd., Beijing, China).

2.7. Determination of Selenium Chemical Forms

The analysis of selenium chemical forms was performed using a sequential extraction method. Dried aboveground part and root samples were defatted by stirring with acetone (1:10 w/v) for 4 h, repeated three times. After each defatting step, centrifugation was performed at 5000 rpm for 40 min. The combined supernatants yielded the water-soluble Se form (Fw). The residue was then extracted with 0.5 mol/L NaCl solution (2 h stirring) followed by centrifugation (5000 rpm, 4 °C, 20 min), repeated three times to obtain the salt-soluble Se form (Fs). Subsequent extractions with 0.6 mol/L acetic acid (HAC) solution and 80% ethanol under identical conditions yielded the weak acid-soluble (FA) and ethanol-soluble (FE) forms, respectively. The final residue represented the residual Se form (FR). All speciations were analyzed for selenium content by atomic fluorescence spectrometer (AFS-9700, Beijing Haiguang Instrument Co., Ltd., Beijing, China).

2.8. Gene Expression Analysis Using Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

The expression levels of 14 selenium metabolism-related genes (SULTR2;1, SULTR3;1, SULTR3;4, SULTR4;1, APS1, APR1, SAT3;1, SAT2;2, SAT1;1, OAS-TL B, OAS-TL C, NFS1, CGS1, and MS1) in peach seedlings were analyzed using the primers listed in Table S1. Total RNA was extracted from leaves using the RNAprep Pure Plant Total RNA Extraction Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing), followed by first-strand cDNA synthesis with the EasyScript One-Step gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis Kit (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China). qRT-PCR was performed using TransStart Top Green qPCR SuperMix (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China). The reaction system consisted of 1 µL cDNA, 0.4 µL forward primer, 0.4 µL reverse primer, 5 µL Green qPCR SuperMix, and 3.2 µL water. The thermal cycling program was as follows: 95.0 °C for 1 min, followed by 95.0 °C for 5 s and 55.0 °C for 30 s, repeated for 39 cycles, and finally, 95.0 °C for 10 s and 65.0 °C for 5 s. The actin gene was used as the internal reference gene. Relative gene expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method with three technical replicates.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software SPSS 19.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Significant differences among treatments were assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by F-tests, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05. Post hoc multiple comparisons were conducted using the Least Significant Difference (LSD) method.

3. Result

3.1. Biomass of Peach Seedlings

Under selenium stress conditions, both root and aboveground biomass of peach seedlings showed significant reductions (p < 0.05) compared to the control, decreasing by 15.24% and 6.24%, respectively (Figure 1). However, when selenium-stressed plants were treated with 24-EBL (24-EBL+Se treatment), both root and aboveground part biomass increased significantly by 7.84% and 3.69% relative to the selenium-only treatment, respectively (p < 0.05). These results demonstrated that foliar application of 24-EBL can effectively mitigate biomass loss in peach seedlings exposed to selenium stress.

3.2. Selenium Content in Peach Seedling

In both Se and 24-EBL+Se treatments, the majority of absorbed selenium accumulated in the root system (2.682 mg/kg and 3.126 mg/kg, respectively), with significantly lower concentrations detected in aboveground parts (0.362 mg/kg and 0.472 mg/kg, respectively) (Figure 2). Compared to the Se treatment alone, the 24-EBL+Se treatment resulted in a significant 16.55% increase in root selenium content (from 2.682 to 3.126 mg/kg) and a more pronounced 30.39% increase in selenium content in the aboveground part (from 0.362 to 0.472 mg/kg). In both the root and aboveground parts, the organic selenium content was significantly higher than the inorganic selenium content (Figure 2).

3.3. Subcellular Distribution of Selenium in Peach Seedlings

Both CW-Se and F-Se selenium fractions in 24-EBL+Se treatment showed significantly higher concentrations compared to the Se-only treatment, while the O-Se remained unchanged (Figure 3). In the aboveground part, 24-EBL+Se treatment also significantly increased CW-Se fractions (Figure 3). Consequently, in roots, the proportional Se distribution under Se treatment was CW-Se (42.3%), O-Se (23.1%), and F-Se (34.6%), which was similar to that in the 24-EBL+Se treatment: CW-Se (42.9%), O-Se (21.6%), and F-Se (35.5%) (Figure 4). By comparison, the distribution pattern shifted from CW-Se (49.8%), O-Se (20.9%), and F-Se (29.3%) in the Se treatment to CW-Se (63.2%), O-Se (16.4%), and F-Se (20.4%) in the 24-EBL+Se treatment, with the cell wall-bound Se fraction increasing sharply while the organelle-bound and free Se fractions decreased proportionally (Figure 4). This suggested that the cell wall is the primary site of Se deposition, and 24-EBL further enhanced Se accumulation in this site.

3.4. Chemical Forms of Selenium in Peach Seedlings

The 24-EBL+Se treatment significantly increased the contents of FE (0.714 vs. 0.567 mg/kg), FW (0.575 vs. 0.448 mg/kg), and FS (0.440 vs. 0.380 mg/kg) in roots compared to the Se treatment alone (Figure 5). Similarly, in the aboveground part, the contents of FE (0.151 vs. 0.104 mg/kg), FW (0.065 vs. 0.051 mg/kg), and FS (0.056 vs. 0.048 mg/kg) were significantly higher in the 24-EBL+Se treatment than in the Se-only treatment (Figure 5). However, the FA content in both roots and aboveground parts significantly decreased under 24-EBL+Se treatment, while no significant differences in FR content were observed between the two treatments.

3.5. Expression Analysis of Selenium Metabolism-Related Genes in Peach Seedlings

Among the 14 genes tested, Se stress induced down-regulation of SULTR2;1, SULTR3;4, APS1, and APR1 genes, while up-regulating SAT3;1, SAT2;2, SAT1;1, OAS-TL C, and CGS1 (Figure 6 and Figure 7) compared to the control. In the 24-EBL+Se treatment, similar expression patterns for the aforementioned genes were observed. Additionally, it significantly up-regulated SULTR3;1 and OAS-TL B but did not alter the expression levels of APS1 and CGS1 significantly. Compared to the Se treatment, 24-EBL+Se significantly up-regulated the expression of SULTR2;1, APS1, SAT3;1, OAS-TL B, and OAS-TL C, while significantly down-regulating SULTR3;1, APR1, NFS1, and CGS1 (Figure 6 and Figure 7).

4. Discussion

In this study, we used exogenous BR (24-EBL) to alleviate the effects of Se stress on the growth of peach seedlings, as indicated by the increased biomass in the 24-EBL+Se treatment compared to the Se-only treatment (Figure 1). By measuring the Se content in the plants, we found that the 24-EBL+Se treatment promoted the uptake of Se by the plants rather than inhibiting it (Figure 2). Therefore, 24-EBL might have activated certain metabolic mechanisms in the peach seedlings to prevent excessive damage caused by the absorbed Se. Similar functions of BRs have also been reported in alleviating the stress caused by cadmium, phenanthrene, and zinc [17,18,19]. Moreover, it indicated that the 24-EBL+Se treatment induced a more pronounced increase in organic Se content compared to inorganic Se (Figure 2). Since the organic Se in plants is derived from the assimilation of inorganic Se [23,24], these findings in the present study demonstrated that 24-EBL enhanced the assimilation process of inorganic Se in peach seedlings.
Plants employ subcellular distribution as a strategy to remove heavy metal toxicity [25,26]. Se can be bound to the cell wall, thereby limiting its effect on other intracellular physiological and metabolic processes [27]. Our findings demonstrated that 24-EBL treatment significantly enhanced selenium sequestration in cell walls (CW-Se), particularly in the aboveground parts (Figure 3 and Figure 4). This indicated that 24-EBL might mitigate selenium toxicity through preferential distribution to the cell wall, thereby protecting vital organelles from selenium-induced damage.
The results of selenium chemical speciation in the present study revealed that the 24-EBL+Se treatment significantly enhanced the levels of water-soluble, ethanol-soluble, and salt-soluble Se forms (Figure 5). The water-soluble form contains predominantly inorganic Se species along with small selenoamino acids, including selenolanthionine, glutamyl-methylselenocysteine (γGMSC), se-methylselenocysteine (MeSeCys), SeCys, and SeMet [28,29]. The ethanol-soluble form comprises monosaccharides, disaccharides, and low-molecular-weight organic Se compounds, while the salt-soluble form includes protein-bound Se and exchangeable Se species [29]. The findings in the present study demonstrated that the organic Se that 24-EBL+Se treatment promoted in peach seedlings was particularly stored as small-molecule organic Se, which contained several low-toxicity compounds, such as MeSeCys [30], selenocystathionine (SeCysth) [31], selenolanthionine [32], and γGMSC [33]. This shift in Se speciation likely contributed to the improvement in Se tolerance in peach seedlings under 24-EBL treatment. Concurrently, the increased incorporation of Se into proteins, as evidenced by elevated ethanol- and salt-soluble Se forms, might explain the relatively minor impact on biomass accumulation in the 24-EBL+Se treatment compared to the control (Figure 1).
The sulfate transporter gene SULTR1;2, known to mediate selenium/sulfate uptake from soil and their subsequent distribution to leaf tissues [34], exhibited low transcriptional expression in peach seedlings under both control (CK) and selenium stress conditions in the present research. Notably, 24-EBL application significantly upregulated SULTR1;2 expression relative to both CK and selenium-treated plants (Figure 6), demonstrating that BRs enhance selenium acquisition through sulfate transport systems while facilitating root-to-shoot selenium translocation.
The SAT-OASTL enzyme complex (serine acetyltransferase (SAT) and O-acetylserine (thiol) lyase (OASTL)) is responsible for the assimilation of inorganic Se into organic Se [35,36]. The present study revealed that under Se stress, the expression of SATs, OAS-TL C, and OAS-TL B was upregulated (Figure 6 and Figure 7). Following 24-EBL application, the expression of these genes was further enhanced. This upregulation might ultimately lead to a significant increase in organic Se content in the 24-EBL+Se treatment (Figure 2).
One of the mechanisms of selenium toxicity in plants is the misincorporation of organic selenium species (e.g., SeCys and SeMet) into cysteine and methionine residues, then disrupting normal metabolic processes [37,38,39]. In contrast, the accumulation of water-soluble, non-protein-bound selenium forms is less toxic [6]. Other detoxification strategies in plants involve reducing selenate to elemental Se (Se0) and selenide (Se2−), which can then be volatilized as dimethylselenide (DMSe) or dimethyldiselenide (DMDSe) [40]. We investigated three key genes in organic selenium metabolism, cysteine desulfurase (NFS1), cystathionine γ-synthase (CGS1), and methionine synthase (MS1) (Figure 6 and Figure 7). NFS1 catalyzes the reduction of SeCys to Se0, while CGS1 and MS1 mediate the conversion of SeCys to SeMet [27]. Notably, Se treatment alone significantly upregulated CGS1 expression, suggesting enhanced SeMet biosynthesis. However, in the 24-EBL+Se treatment, CGS1 expression levels showed no significant difference from the control and were even significantly lower than in Se-treated plants, indicating that attenuated SeMet production likely contributed to the reduction in selenium toxicity. Furthermore, our selenium chemical speciation analysis (Figure 5) suggested that 24-EBL promotes the accumulation of less toxic water-soluble small selenoamino acids, providing the enhanced selenium tolerance observed in 24-EBL-treated peach seedlings.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrated that 24-EBL application effectively mitigated selenium stress while promoting selenium accumulation in peach seedlings. Foliar application of 24-EBL enhanced plant biomass and total selenium content under selenium stress, facilitated organic selenium translocation from roots to aboveground, reduced selenium toxicity through cell wall sequestration of inorganic selenium, and upregulated key selenium metabolism genes (Sultr1;2, SATs, OAS-TLs, and CGS1). These molecular and physiological modifications collectively regulated organic selenium assimilation and conversion, minimized damage from excessive selenocysteine accumulation, and enhanced plant selenium enrichment capacity. Our findings provide a scientific foundation for employing 24-EBL, offering practical applications for selenium-enriched agricultural production systems. Future studies should employ more precise metabolite profiling (e.g., high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)) and comprehensive transcriptome analysis to better understand the mechanisms of 24-EBL in alleviating Se stress.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/horticulturae11080909/s1, Table S1: Primers for qRT-PCR.

Author Contributions

Z.H.: Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Writing—original draft. Q.C.: Investigation, Resources, Writing—original draft. Y.D.: Investigation, Resources, Writing—original draft. J.Z.: Resources, Supervision, Writing—review and editing. L.L.: Resources, Supervision. M.Z.: Conceptualization, Writing—review and editing. X.W.: Formal analysis, Conceptualization, Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Sichuan “Double High-Level” Crop Production and Management Professional Cluster Program (0200590060202).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Hartikainen, H. Biogeochemistry of selenium and its impact on food chain quality and human health. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2005, 18, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lv, Q.; Liang, X.; Nong, K.; Gong, Z.; Qin, T.; Qin, X.; Wang, D.; Zhu, Y. Advances in research on the toxicological effects of selenium. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2021, 106, 715–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rayman, M.P.; Infante, H.G.; Sargent, M. Food-chain selenium and human health: Spotlight on speciation. Br. J. Nutr. 2008, 100, 238–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Luo, L.Y.; Fu, P.N.; Wang, Q.; Li, H.F. Selenium uptake and biotransformation in brassica rapa supplied with selenite and selenate: A hydroponic work with HPLC speciation and RNA-sequencing. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 12408–12418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Song, J.; Yu, S.; Yang, R.; Xiao, J.; Liu, J. Opportunities for the use of selenium nanoparticles in agriculture. NanoImpact 2023, 31, 100478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fordyce, F.M. Selenium deficiency and toxicity in the environment. In Essentials of Medical Geology, 1st ed.; Selinus, O., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 375–416. [Google Scholar]
  7. Thiry, C.; Ruttens, A.; Temmerman, L.D.; Schneider, Y.J.; Pussemier, L. Current knowledge in species-related bioavailability of selenium in food. Food Chem. 2012, 130, 767–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Winkel, L.H.; Johnson, C.A.; Lenz, M.; Grundl, T.; Leupin, O.X.; Amini, M.; Charlet, L. Environmental selenium research: From microscopic processes to global understanding. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 571–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, Y.; Ma, J.; Li, F.; Zeng, X.; Wu, Z.; Huang, Y.; Xue, Y.; Wang, Y. High concentrations of Se inhibited the growth of rice seedlings. Plants 2024, 13, 1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xue, T.; Hartikainen, H.; Piironen, V. Antioxidative and growth-promoting effect of selenium on senescing lettuce. Plant Soil 2001, 237, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, J.; Liang, D.; Qin, S.; Feng, P.; Wu, X. Effects of selenite and selenate application on growth and shoot selenium accumulation of pak choi (Brassica chinensis L.) during successive planting conditions. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 11076–11086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Reynolds, R.J.B.; Pilon-Smits, E.A.H. Plant selenium hyperaccumulation-Ecological effects and potential implications for selenium cycling and community structure. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Gen. Subj. 2018, 1862, 2372–2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Feng, R.; Wei, C.; Tu, S. The roles of selenium in protecting plants against abiotic stresses. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013, 87, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wani, A.S.; Ahmad, A.; Hayat, S.; Tahir, I. Epibrassinolide and proline alleviate the photosynthetic and yield inhibition under salt stress by acting on antioxidant system in mustard. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 135, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ali, M.M.; Anwar, R.; Malik, A.U.; Khan, A.S.; Ahmad, S.; Hussain, Z.; Hasan, M.U.; Nasir, M.; Chen, F. Plant Growth and Fruit Quality Response of Strawberry is Improved After Exogenous Application of 24-Epibrassinolide. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 41, 1786–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Krishna, P.; Prasad, B.D.; Rahman, T. Brassinosteroid action in plant abiotic stress tolerance. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1564, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sharma, P.; Kumar, A.; Bhardwaj, R. Plant steroidal hormone epibrassinolide regulate-heavy metal stress tolerance in Oryza sativa L. by modulating antioxidant defense expression. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 122, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ahammed, G.J.; Choudhary, S.P.; Chen, S.; Xia, X.J.; Shi, K.; Zhou, Y.; Yu, J. Role of brassinosteroids in alleviation of phenanthrene–cadmium co-contamination-induced photosynthetic inhibition and oxidative stress in tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 199–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kumar, N.; Sharma, V.; Kaur, G.; Lata, C.; Dasila, H.; Perveen, K.; Khan, F.; Gupta, V.K.; Khanam, M.N. Brassinosteroids as promoters of seedling growth and antioxidant activity under heavy metal zinc stress in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1259103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dai, Z.; Zhang, D.; Li, Z.; Liu, X.; Liu, H.; Yan, K.; Liu, B.; Zhang, J.; Lin, L. Melatonin and 24-epibrassinolide promote the growth and selenium uptake of wild peach seedlings under selenium stress. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2025, 44, e14615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lin, L.J.; Li, Z.Y.; Wang, J.; Liang, D.; Xia, H.; Lv, X.L.; Tang, Y.; Wang, X.; Deng, Q.X.; Liao, M. 24-epibrassinolide promotes selenium uptake in grapevine under selenium stress. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 308, 111564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; Liang, D.; Xia, H.; Lv, X.; Deng, Q.; Wang, X.; Luo, X.; Liao, M.; et al. Gibberellic acid promotes selenium accumulation in Cyphomandra betacea under selenium stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 968768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wirtz, M.; Hell, R. Functional analysis of the cysteine synthase protein complex from plants: Structural, biochemical and regulatory properties. J. Plant Physiol. 2006, 163, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wirtz, M.; Beard, K.F.M.; Lee, C.P.; Boltz, A.; Schwarzländer, M.; Fuchs, C.; Meyer, A.J.; Heeg, C.; Sweetlove, L.J.; Ratcliffe, R.G.; et al. Mitochondrial cysteine synthase complex regulates O-acetylserine biosynthesis in plants. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 27941–27947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, H.; Luo, N.; Zhang, L.J.; Zhao, H.M.; Li, Y.W.; Cai, Q.Y.; Wong, M.H.; Mo, C.H. Do arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi affect cadmium uptake kinetics, subcellular distribution and chemical forms in rice? Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 571, 1183–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hall, J.L. Cellular mechanisms for heavy metal detoxification and tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, K.; Wang, Y.; Li, K.; Wan, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhuang, Z.; Guo, Y.; Li, H. Uptake, translocation and biotransformation of selenium nanoparticles in rice seedlings (Oryza sativa L.). J. Nanobiotechnol. 2020, 18, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tangjaidee, P.; Swedlund, P.; Xiang, J.; Yin, H.; Quek, S.Y. Selenium-enriched plant foods: Selenium accumulation, speciation, and health functionality. Front. Nutr. 2023, 9, 962312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, H.; Shi, Z.; Li, J.; Zhao, P.; Qin, S.; Nie, Z. The impact of phosphorus supply on selenium uptake during hydroponics experiment of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) in China. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pilon-Smits, E.A.H.; Quinn, C.F.; Hell, R.; Mendel, R.R. Selenium metabolism in plants. In Cell Biology of Metals and Nutrients, 1st ed.; Hell, R., Mendel, R.R., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 225–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Freeman, J.L.; Zhang, L.H.; Marcus, M.A.; Fakra, S.; McGrath, S.P.; Pilon-Smits, E.A. Spatial imaging, speciation, and quantification of selenium in the hyperaccumulator plants Astragalus bisulcatus and Stanleya pinnata. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Both, E.B.; Shao, S.; Xiang, J.; Jókai, Z.; Yin, H.; Liu, Y.; Magyar, A.; Dernovics, M. Selenolanthionine is the major water-soluble selenium compound in the selenium tolerant plant Cardamine violifolia. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Gen. Subj. 2018, 1862, 2354–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Freeman, J.L.; Tamaoki, M.; Stushnoff, C.; Quinn, C.F.; Cappa, J.J.; Devonshire, J.; Fakra, S.C.; Marcus, M.A.; McGrath, S.P.; Van Hoewyk, D.; et al. Molecular mechanisms of selenium tolerance and hyperaccumulation in Stanleya pinnata. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 1630–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Shibagaki, N.; Rose, A.; McDermott, J.P.; Fujiwara, T.; Hayashi, H.; Yoneyama, T.; Davies, J.P. Selenate-resistant mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana identify Sultr1;2, a sulfate transporter required for efficient transport of sulfate into roots. Plant J. 2002, 29, 475–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Trippe, R.C.; Elizabeth, A.H.; Smits, P. Selenium transport and metabolism in plants: Phytoremediation and biofortification implications. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 404, 124178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Revilleza, M.J.; Galvez, A.F.; Krenz, D.C.; Lumen, B.O.D. An 8 kDa methionine-rich protein from soybean (Glycine max) cotyledon: Identification, purification, and n-terminal sequence. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996, 44, 2930–2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. White, P.J.; Bowen, H.C.; Marshall, B.; Broadley, M.R. Extraordinarily high leaf selenium to sulfur ratios define ‘Se-accumulator’ plants. Ann. Bot.-Lond. 2007, 100, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Finley, J.W.; Sigrid-Keck, A.; Robbins, R.J.; Hintze, K.J. Selenium enrichment of broccoli: Interactions between selenium and secondary plant compounds. J. Nutr. 2005, 135, 1236–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kaur, M.; Sharma, S. Selenium affects protein accumulation and its distribution in different protein fractions in developing wheat grains. Cereal Res. Commun. 2021, 49, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dumont, E.; Vanhaecke, F.; Cornelis, R. Selenium speciation from food source to metabolites: A critical review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2006, 385, 1304–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The biomass of root and aboveground parts. The lowercase letters a, b, and c denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. The biomass of root and aboveground parts. The lowercase letters a, b, and c denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Horticulturae 11 00909 g001
Figure 2. The selenium contents in root and aboveground parts. The lowercase letters a and b denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. The selenium contents in root and aboveground parts. The lowercase letters a and b denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Horticulturae 11 00909 g002
Figure 3. The selenium contents in subcellular fractions in root and aboveground parts. CW-Se, cell wall fraction Se; O-Se, organelle fraction Se; F-Se, free fraction Se. The lowercase letters a and b denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. The selenium contents in subcellular fractions in root and aboveground parts. CW-Se, cell wall fraction Se; O-Se, organelle fraction Se; F-Se, free fraction Se. The lowercase letters a and b denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Horticulturae 11 00909 g003
Figure 4. The proportional Se subcellular distribution in root and aboveground parts. CW-Se, cell wall fraction Se; O-Se, organelle fraction Se; F-Se, free fraction Se.
Figure 4. The proportional Se subcellular distribution in root and aboveground parts. CW-Se, cell wall fraction Se; O-Se, organelle fraction Se; F-Se, free fraction Se.
Horticulturae 11 00909 g004
Figure 5. The selenium contents in different chemical forms in the root and aboveground parts. FE, ethanol-soluble Se; FW, water-soluble Se; FS, salt-soluble Se; FA, weak acid-soluble Se; FR, residual Se. The lowercase letters a and b denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. The selenium contents in different chemical forms in the root and aboveground parts. FE, ethanol-soluble Se; FW, water-soluble Se; FS, salt-soluble Se; FA, weak acid-soluble Se; FR, residual Se. The lowercase letters a and b denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Horticulturae 11 00909 g005
Figure 6. The qRT-PCR analysis of selenium metabolism-related genes. The colors show the log10 of different treatment ratios. “*” denotes the differentially expressed genes with a significance threshold of p < 0.05.
Figure 6. The qRT-PCR analysis of selenium metabolism-related genes. The colors show the log10 of different treatment ratios. “*” denotes the differentially expressed genes with a significance threshold of p < 0.05.
Horticulturae 11 00909 g006
Figure 7. Schematic model of Se metabolism in peach seedling. The three arrows/circles next to gene names are Se vs. CK, 24-EBL+Se vs. CK, and 24-EBL+Se vs. Se. The orange up arrows indicate significantly up-expression, blue down arrows indicate significantly down-expression, and grey circles indicate no significant change.
Figure 7. Schematic model of Se metabolism in peach seedling. The three arrows/circles next to gene names are Se vs. CK, 24-EBL+Se vs. CK, and 24-EBL+Se vs. Se. The orange up arrows indicate significantly up-expression, blue down arrows indicate significantly down-expression, and grey circles indicate no significant change.
Horticulturae 11 00909 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hang, Z.; Cao, Q.; Du, Y.; Zhang, J.; Lin, L.; Zhang, M.; Wang, X. Exogenous 24-Epibrassinolide Alleviated Selenium Stress in Peach Seedling. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 909. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11080909

AMA Style

Hang Z, Cao Q, Du Y, Zhang J, Lin L, Zhang M, Wang X. Exogenous 24-Epibrassinolide Alleviated Selenium Stress in Peach Seedling. Horticulturae. 2025; 11(8):909. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11080909

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hang, Zhiyu, Qizhe Cao, Yunyao Du, Jinrong Zhang, Lijin Lin, Mingfei Zhang, and Xun Wang. 2025. "Exogenous 24-Epibrassinolide Alleviated Selenium Stress in Peach Seedling" Horticulturae 11, no. 8: 909. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11080909

APA Style

Hang, Z., Cao, Q., Du, Y., Zhang, J., Lin, L., Zhang, M., & Wang, X. (2025). Exogenous 24-Epibrassinolide Alleviated Selenium Stress in Peach Seedling. Horticulturae, 11(8), 909. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11080909

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop