3.1. Results of the Genetic Variability in the Tilia Genus Using ISSR Primers
Analysis of variance regarding the presence or absence of bands generated by the ten ISSR primers used to assess the genetic diversity of the studied populations determined a high degree of genetic polymorphism (
p < 0.001). This indicates the efficiency of using ISSR primers to assess genetic polymorphism in the four populations and that this technique can be applied to genetic diversity and conservation studies of these species (
Table 2).
The ISSR primers used resulted in polymorphic bands, with a polymorphism rate of 61.54% for A17 and 93.33% for A13 (
Table 3 and
Figure 2), which indicates significant genetic diversity among the
Tilia spp. samples analyzed.
The ISSR primers A7, A12, A13, A21, UBC873, and UBC886 generated the highest levels of polymorphism (75% and 93.33%) (
Table 2 and
Figure 2).
The primer UBC873 generated 20 polymorphic bands out of 22, indicating a polymorphism rate of 90.91%.
A17 and UBC864 showed a polymorphism percentage of 61.54% and 71.43%, respectively (
Table 3 and
Figure 2).
Regarding the polymorphism value (PIC), the highest value was registered at the primer A17 (0.484), followed by A13 (0.438), UBC884 (0.433), UBC873 (0.425), UBC864 (0.425), UBC886 (0.422), A21 (0.420), A7 (0.417), UBC840 (0.403) and A12 (0.398) with the lowest value (
Table 3).
The Discrimination Index (PI) measures the efficiency of a particular primer in detecting polymorphism. The highest value was recorded at UBC873 of 8.500 and the lowest at UBC840 of 3.625 (
Table 3).
Therefore, UBC873 was the most efficient primer in detecting species variability between Tilia spp. studied populations. Also, UBC873 recorded the highest amplified fragment size amplitude, 150–1430 bp. In contrast, the lowest range of amplified fragments was recorded for UBC864 (200–590) bp and UBC840 (125–550) bp.
The analysis of all gels revealed 165 alleles (10 primers) with an average of 16.5 alleles/primer, the distribution of which was statistically analyzed (
Table 4).
The ten primers generated 165 bands, of which 134 were polymorphic, resulting in an average polymorphism rate of 81.20%, associated with a marker index of 5.569 (
Table 4).
Depending on the presence (1) or absence (0) of polymorphic bands in the four populations, a matrix of genetic similarity between them was generated and used to construct the dendrogram (
Figure 3) according to the cluster averaging method.
Cluster analyses showed that the studied populations were grouped in two clusters with a genetic similarity of 45%.
The first cluster consists of populations (T1) and (T2), with 78.79% common alleles among the studied primers.
The second cluster consists of populations (T3) and (T4), with a genetic diversity of 36.36%. Populations (T3) and (T4) showed a high genetic diversity of 52.42–56.66% compared to the two populations (T1) and (T2) from the first cluster (
Figure 3).
Therefore, it was observed that (T1) and (T2) were in the same cluster, with a similarity percentage of 78.79%. Phenotypic analysis of these populations confirmed the genetic results, framing the two populations in the Tilia cordata species because they had common traits such as hairs in the vein axils on the lower surface of their leaves, glabrous buds, and glabrous and brown-reddish twigs.
Population (T3), which differs genetically from the others, having a similar degree, has been classified as Tilia platyphyllos because tree leaves are hairy on the front, and on the reverse, they have tufts of hair, and very prominent veins, glabrous buds, and glabrous and brown-reddish twigs.
According to the phenotypic characteristics, the (T4) population has been classified as a T. argentea species because it has pubescent grey twigs and pubescent buds, and the trees’ leaves are silvery on the reverse, without tufts of hair in the axils of the veins.
The morphological characters of the analyzed trees are in accordance with the literary description of
Tilia spp. [
62].
The observed sequence of blooming in the period May-June-beginning of July was
T. platyphyllos (T3),
T. cordata I (T1),
T. cordata II (T2), and then
T. argentea (T4)
, similar with previously recorded sequence by other researchers [
63,
64].
3.1.1. Specific Alleles Analysis of Tilia spp. Populations Using ISSR Primers
Analyses using the ten primers identified unique DNA fragments present only in specific populations (
Table 5). These bands can be used as DNA markers for the identification of the respective populations [
65] or in the compilation of genetic maps [
65,
66]. Of the four populations in which specific alleles were identified, population
T. platyphyllos (T3) had the most significant number of specific DNA fragments (17). In contrast, the
T. cordata I (T1) population had only six specific bands (
Table 5).
The number of specific DNA fragments generated by each primer for each species was analyzed to select the best primers for identifying different Tilia species.
For the T. cordata I (T1) population, primers UBC864 and A12 generated the most specific bands, each contributing with two bands.
For the T. cordata II (T2) population, primers UBC840 and A7 each generated four specific DNA fragments.
For the population T. platyphyllos (T3), the A13 primer generated four specific DNA fragments.
For the population T. argentea (T4), primer A7 generated three specific DNA fragments.
Thus, primers UBC864, A12, UBC840, and A7 are more efficient in identifying Tilia cordata species; primer A13 can be used to identify T. platyphyllos species, and primer A7 can be used to identify T. argentea species. In contrast, primer A17 did not generate specific DNA fragments from the analyses of the studied populations.
The three Tilia species analyzed showed a high level of diversity among their populations, which is in accordance with their taxonomy. Thus, even if all four populations belong to the genus Tilia, their grouping into two distinct clusters indicates that we have populations belonging to different species groups within the same genus Tilia.
Polymorphism within the T. cordata species at the two sites, particularly of specific DNA fragments generated by primers UBC864 and A12 (T1) and UBC840 and A7 (T2), highlights the importance of using molecular markers to maintain the genetic purity of the Tilia species.
3.1.2. Optimization of ISSR Primers Analysis in Monitoring Populations of Tilia spp.
Statistical correlations were observed between most of the used primers (
Figure 4). These results showed good efficiency in identifying polymorphism and establishing genetic diversity between different populations.
To optimize a 50% more economically efficient method for analyzing larger populations, we investigated the correlations between ISSR markers in the context of the genetic structure of studied populations. In this respect, only the primers that covered all significant negative correlations were selected: UBC840, UBC864, UBC873, UBC886, and A17.
In contrast, we selected positively correlated markers such as A7, A12, A13, A21, and UBC884 (primers that determine the same banding patterns) to cover all areas of positive correlations.
Primer selection is essential in the research of Tilia spp. variability to achieve economically efficient results.
The use of primers group UBC840, UBC864, UBC873, UBC886, and A17 resulted in significant variation in genetic polymorphism among
T. cordata,
T. platyphyllos, and
T. argentea species
(p < 0.001) (
Table 6). These results are similar to the initial ten primers (
Table 2). Thus, this method reduced the number of ISSR primers from 10 to 5.
In contrast, the use of primers A7, A12, A13, A21, and UBC884 that showed positive correlations did not result in significant variation in genetic polymorphism in the
Tilia populations analyzed (
p > 0.085) (
Table 7). This suggests that this group of primers was not sufficiently effective in identifying polymorphism in the analyzed
Tilia populations due to their correlative similarities (
Figure 4).
Selecting suitable primers is essential to ensure adequate genetic diversity coverage and polymorphism coverage.
The selection of primers with strong negative correlations, such as UBC840, UBC864, UBC873, UBC886, and A17, was advantageous for obtaining significant results in genetic polymorphism analysis. Also, depending on the species analyzed and the specific morphological characters, the group of primers can be adapted to obtain more accurate and representative results.
Thus, (i) primers UBC864, A12, UBC840, and A7 might be more suitable to identify the species T. cordata; (ii) primer A13 might be more suitable to identify the species T. platyphyllos and (iii) primer A7 to identify the species T. argentea.
This method allows for more efficient genetic diversity analysis of Tilia populations. It uses groups of primers selected according to the species analyzed and their ability to generate a high degree of polymorphism.
Tillia spp. tree diversity can be assessed efficiently using the ISSR primers as they reveal many alleles, which is in accordance with the literature data.
At the same time, the genetic degree of similarity and the grouping of the clusters were correlated with the morphological characteristics of the twigs, buds, and leaves, showing that this category of markers can be helpful in taxonomy studies.
Advanced statistical evaluations have allowed us to efficiently restrict the number of markers used to assess variability in Tillia spp. trees, thus reducing the cost of analysis.
3.2. Results Regarding Statistical Analyses Made on Dendrometric Indices of Studied Tilia Species
3.2.1. Descriptive Statistics of Dendrometric Measurements
According to dendrometric measurements and statistic descriptive analyses, the four populations of Tilia spp. have the following phenotypic characteristics:
Population T1 is formed of 30 T. cordata tree individuals planted in the Albinelor Street alignment; the trees have the following:
- -
Average medium trunk diameter at breast height (DBHmT1) = 11.16 cm; with a standard deviation of 5.38; minimum (DBHmT1) = 5.25 cm and maximum (DBHmT1) = 36.35 cm;
- -
Mean of total tree heights (HtotT1) = 7.11 m, with a standard deviation of 1.17; minimum (HtotT1) = 4.8 m and maximum (HtotT1) = 10.1 m;
- -
Mean of trunk height (htT1) = 5.37 m, with a standard deviation of 1.06; minimum (htT1) = 3.2 m and maximum (htT1) = 8.2 m;
- -
Mean of crown height (hcT1) = 1.74 m, with a standard deviation of 0.18; minimum (hcT1) = 1.4 m and maximum (hcT1) = 2.2 m;
- -
Average medium crown spread (PmT1) = 3.31 m; with a standard deviation of 1.21; minimum (PmT1) = 1.7 m and maximum (PmT1) = 7.35 m
Population T2 is formed of 30 T. cordata tree individuals planted in I.I de la Brad green spaces; the trees have the following:
- -
Average medium trunk diameter at breast height (DBHmT2) = 17.4 cm; with a standard deviation of 7.11; minimum (DBHmT2) = 6.1 cm and maximum (DBHmT2) = 27 cm;
- -
Mean of total tree heights (HtotT2) = 8.72 m, with a standard deviation of 1.32; minimum (HtotT2) = 6 m and maximum (HtotT2) = 10.04 m;
- -
Mean of trunk height (htT2) = 6.83 m, with a standard deviation of 1.27; minimum (htT2) = 4.2 m and maximum (htT2) = 8.2 m;
- -
Mean of crown height (hcT2) = 1.88 m, with a standard deviation of 0.17; minimum (hcT2) = 1.5 m and maximum (hcT2) = 2.2 m;
- -
Average medium crown spread (PmT2) = 5.62 m; with a standard deviation of 2.4; minimum (PmT2) = 2 m and maximum (PmT2) = 8.1 m.
Population T3 is formed of 30 T. platyphyllos tree individuals planted in the Lorena Street alignment; the trees have the following:
- -
Average medium trunk diameter at breast height (DBHmT3) = 20.06 cm; with a standard deviation of 10.82; minimum (DBHmT3) = 4.25 cm and maximum (DBHmT3) = 43.15 cm;
- -
Mean of total tree heights (HtotT3) = 10.93 m, with a standard deviation of 3.21; minimum (HtotT3) = 4.17 m and maximum (HtotT3) = 18 m;
- -
Mean of trunk height (htT3) = 9.05 m, with a standard deviation of 3.05; minimum (htT3) = 3 m and maximum (htT3) = 16 m;
- -
Mean of crown height (hcT3) = 1.88 m, with a standard deviation of 0.25; minimum (hcT3) = 1.3 m and maximum (hcT3) = 2.4 m;
- -
Average medium crown spread (PmT2) = 6.40 m; with a standard deviation of 2.36; minimum (PmT3) = 1.15 m and maximum (PmT3) = 8.8 m
Population T4 is formed of 30 T. argentea tree individuals planted in Torontalului green areas; the trees have the following:
- -
Average medium trunk diameter at breast height (DBHmT4) = 13.85 cm; with a standard deviation of 7.25; minimum (DBHmT4) = 4.9 cm and maximum (DBHmT4) = 26.05 cm;
- -
The mean of total tree heights (HtotT4) = 7.7 m, with a standard deviation of 1.53; minimum (HtotT4) = 5 m and maximum (HtotT4) = 10.6 m;
- -
The mean of trunk height (htT4) = 5.88 m, with a standard deviation of 1.36; minimum (htT4) = 3.2 m and maximum (htT4) = 8.4 m;
- -
The mean of crown height (hcT4) = 1.81 m, with a standard deviation of 0.3; minimum (hcT4) = 1.3 m and maximum (hcT4) = 2.4 m;
- -
Average medium crown spread (PmT4) = 3.68 m; with a standard deviation of 1.72; minimum (PmT4) = 1.25 m and maximum (PmT4) = 6.65 m.
3.2.2. Comparations between Dendrometric Indices
Medium trunk diameter at breast height (DBHm)
There are significant differences (p < 0.05) between medium trunk diameter at breast height (DBHm) of
- -
T. cordata I (DBHmT1) = 11.16 cm and T. cordata II (DBHmT2) = 17.4 cm (p = 0.0218);
- -
T. cordata I (DBHmT1) = 11.16 cm and T. platyphyllos (DBHmT3) = 20.06 cm (p = 0.0039).
In contrast, there are no significant differences (p > 0.05) between medium trunk diameter at breast height DBHm of
- -
T. cordata I (DBHm T1) = 11.16 cm and T. argentea (DBHmT4) = 13.85 cm;
- -
T. cordata II (DBHmT2) = 17.4 cm and T. platyphyllos (DBHmT3) = 20.06 cm;
- -
T. cordata II (DBHmT2) = 17.4 cm and
T. argentea (DBHmT4) = 13.85 cm (
Figure 5A).
The higher value of average medium trunk diameter at breast height was recorded at population T. platyphyllos (DBHmT3) = 20.06 cm, and the lowest value was recorded at population T. cordata I (DBHmT1) = 11.16 cm.
Analyzing the DBHm values of all four populations, we observed that population T. platyphyllos (T3) recorded both the minimum (DBHmT3) = 4.25 cm and the maximum (DBHmT3) = 43.15 cm.
Total tree height (Htot)
There are significant differences (p < 0.05) between total tree high (Htot) of T. cordata I (HtotT1) = 7.11 m and T. cordata II (HtotT2) = 8.72 m (p = 0.0059); T. cordata I (HtotT1) = 7.11 m and T. platyphyllos (HtotT3) = 10.93 m (p < 0.0001); T. platyphyllos (HtotT3) = 10.93 m and T. argentea (HtotT4) = 7.7 m (p < 0.0001).
In contrast, there are no significant differences (
p > 0.05) between the
total tree height (Htot) of
T. cordata II (HtotT2) = 8.72 m and
T. platyphyllos (HtotT3) = 10.93 m;
T. cordata II (HtotT2) = 8.72 m and
T. argentea (HtotT4) = 7.7 m;
T. cordata I (HtotT1) = 7.11 m and
T. argentea (HtotT4) = 7.7 m; (
Figure 5B).
The higher value of the mean total tree height (Htot) was recorded at population T. platyphyllos (HtotT3) = 10.93 m, and the lowest value was recorded at population T. cordata I (HtotT1) = 7.11 m.
Analyzing the Htot values of all four populations, we observed that population T. platyphyllos (T3) recorded both a minimum (HtotT3) of 4.17 m and a maximum (HtotT3) of 18 m.
Trunk height (ht)
There are significant differences (
p < 0.05) between
trunk height (ht) of
T. cordata I (htT1) = 5.37 m and
T. cordata II (htT2) = 6.83 m (
p = 0.0081);
T. cordata I (htT1) = 5.37 m and
T. platyphyllos (htT3) = 9.05 m (
p < 0.0001);
T. platyphyllos (htT3) = 9.05 m and
T. argentea (ht T4) (
p < 0.0001). In contrast, there are no significant differences (
p > 0.05) between
trunk height (ht) of:
T. cordata I (htT1) = 5.37 m and
T. argentea (htT4) = 5.88 m;
T. cordata II (htT2) = 6.83 m and
T. platyphyllos (htT3) = 9.05 m;
T. cordata (htT2) = 6.83 m and
T. argentea (htT4) = 5.88 m (
Figure 5C).
The higher value of the mean of trunk high (ht) was recorded at population T. Platyphyllos (htT3) = 10.93 m, and the lowest value was recorded at population T. cordata I (htT1) = 5.37 m;
Analyzing the (ht) values of all four populations, we observed that population T. platyphyllos (T3) recorded both the minimum (ht) values (htT3) = 3 m and the maximum (htT3) = 16 m.
Crown height (hc)
There are significant differences (
p < 0.05) between
crown height (hc) of
T. cordata I (hcT1) = 1.74 m and
T. cordata II (hcT2) = 1.88 m (
p = 0.009);
T. cordata I (hcT1) = 1.74 m and
T. platyphyllos (hcT3) = 1.88 m (
p = 0.028). In contrast, there are no significant differences (
p > 0.05) between
crown height (hc) of
T. cordata I (hcT1) = 1.74 m and
T. argentea (hcT4) = 1.81 m;
T. cordata II (hcT2) = 1.88 m and
T. argentea (hc T4);
T. platyphyllos (hcT3) = 1.88 m and
T. argentea (hcT4) = 1.81 m (
Figure 5D).
The higher value of the mean of crown high (hc) was recorded at population T. platyphyllos (hcT3) = 1.88 m and T. cordata II (hcT2) = 1.88 m; the lowest value was recorded at population T. cordata I (hcT1) = 1.74 m.
Analyzing the (hc) values of all four populations, we observed that the minimum values (hc) = 1.3 m and the maximum (hc) = 2.4 m were recorded at both populations, T. platyphyllos and T. argentea.
Medium crown spread (Pm)
There are significant differences (
p < 0.05) between
medium crown spread (Pm) of:
T. cordata I (PmT1) = 3.31 m and
T. cordata II (PmT2) = 5.62 m (
p = 0.0029);
T. cordata I (PmT1) = 3.31 m and
T. platyphyllos (PmT3) = 6.40 m (
p < 0.0001);
T. cordata II (PmT2) = 5.62 m and
T. argentea (PmT4) = 3.68 m (
p = 0.0145);
T. platyphyllos (PmT3) = 6.40 m and
T. argentea (PmT4) = 3.68 m (
p < 0.0001). In contrast, there are no significant differences (
p > 0.05) between
medium crown spread (Pm) of
T. cordata I (PmT1) = 3.31 m and
T. platyphyllos (PmT3) = 6.40 m;
T. platyphyllos (PmT3) = 6.40 m and
T. argentea (PmT4) = 3.68 m (
Figure 5E).
The higher value of average medium crown spread (Pm) was recorded at population T. platyphyllos (PmT3) = 6.40 m, and the lowest value was recorded at population T. cordata I (PmT1) = 3.31 m.
Analyzing the medium crown spread (Pm) values between all four populations, we observed that population T. platyphyllos (T3) recorded both the minimum (PmT3) = 1.15 m and the maximum (PmT3) = 8.8 m.
3.2.3. Correlation and Linear Regressions
Pearson correlation coefficients (
Figure 6) and simple linear regressions (
Figure 7) computed to assess the linear relationships between dendrometric measurements of trees showed that there are:
- -
Statistically significant high positive correlations between medium diameter of the trunk at breast height (DBHm) and medium trunk height (ht) for: T1 (r(28) = 0.76, p < 0.0001, DBHmT1 = 0.15htT1 + 3.7); T3 (r (28) = 0.87, p < 0.0001, DBHmT3 = 4.1htT3 + 0.25); T4 (r (28) = 0.89, p < 0.0001, DBHmT4 = 3.6htT4 + 0.17); and statistically very significant high positive correlations between DBHm and ht for T2 (r (28) = 0.93, p < 0.0001, DBHmT2 = 3.9htT2 + 0.17).
This means that the larger the medium diameter of the trunk at breast height (DBHm1–DBHm120) is, the greater the medium trunk high (ht1–ht120) is for all 120 analyzed trees of the four populations of Tilia spp. analyzed.
- -
Statistically significant very high positive correlations between medium trunk height (ht) and medium total tree height (Htot) for all four populations: T1 (r (28) = 0.99, p < 0.0001, HtotT1 = 1.2 + 1.1htT1); T2 (r (28) = 0.99, p < 0.0001, HtotT2 =1.7 + htT2); T3 (r (28) = 1 p < 0.0001, HtotT3 = 1.4 + htT3); T4 (r (28) = 0.99, p < 0.0001, HtotT4 = 1.2 + 1.1htT4).
This means that the higher the medium trunk height (ht1–ht120) is, the higher the medium total tree height (Htot1–Htot120) is for all 120 analyzed trees of the four populations of Tilia spp. analyzed.
- -
Statistically significant high positive correlations between the medium diameter of the trunk at breast height (DBHm) and medium crown spread (Pm) for T1 (r (28) = 0.85, p < 0.0001, PmT1 = 1.2 + 0.19 DBHmT1) and for T3 (r (28) = 0.82, p < 0.0001, PmT3 = 2.8 + 0.18DBHmT3) and—statistically very significant high positive correlations between the medium diameter of the trunk at breast height (DBHm) and medium crown spread (Pm) for T2 (r (28) = 0.93, p < 0.0001, PmT2 = 01.2 + 0.31 DBHmT2) and for T4 (r (28) = 0.95, p < 0.0001, PmT1 = 0.56 + 0.23 DBHmT4).
This means that the larger the medium diameter of the trunk at breast height (DBHm) is, the larger the medium crown spread (Pm) is for all 120 analyzed trees of the four populations of Tilia spp. analyzed.
Figure 7 show the data, the regression lines and regression equations, the linear correlation coefficients, the level of statistical significance, and the density curves for the two data distributions.
3.2.4. Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis
The inertia of the first principal components shows if there are strong relationships between variables and suggests the number of components that should be studied. The first two principal components of analysis express 92.75% of the total dataset inertia; that means that 92.75% of the individual’s cloud total variability is explained by the plane spanned by the first two principal components (
Figure 8B).
This percentage is very high; thus, the first plane represents data variability very well. This value is greater than the reference value (50.39%); the variability explained by this plane is thus highly significant (the reference value is the 0.95-quantile of the inertia percentages distribution obtained by simulating 6543 data tables of equivalent size based on a normal distribution).
The first principal component factor is significant: it expresses itself in 78.42% of the data variability (
Figure 8A). Note that in such a case, the variability related to the other components might be meaningless despite a high percentage. This axis presents an amount of inertia more significant than those obtained by the 0.95-quantile of random distributions (78.42% against 27.78%) (
Figure 8B). This observation suggests that this axis carries great information. The most important contribution for this component comes from the following variables: Htot, ht, DBHm, and Pm (which are all highly positively correlated) (
Figure 8C). The second principal component expresses itself 14.33% of the data variability (
Figure 8A). The most important contribution of this component comes from the variable hc (
Figure 8D). Cluster analysis, the dendrogram for all 120 studied trees is presented in
Figure 9. This highlights the clustering of trees according to the values of measured dendrometric parameters of each individual, regardless of the species they belong to.