Next Article in Journal
Variability in Morphological, Biochemical, and Proximate Yield Composition among Predominant Amaranthus hybridus Cultivars in South-West Nigeria
Previous Article in Journal
Joint Action of Trichoderma atroviride and a Vegetal Derived-Protein Hydrolysate Improves Performances of Woodland Strawberry in Italy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Establishment of Tissue Culture and Regeneration System in Hippophae gyantsensis Lian

1
State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2
Key Laboratory of Cultivation and Protection for Non-Wood Forest Trees of the Ministry of Education and Key Laboratory of Non-Wood Forest Products of the Forestry Ministry, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
3
Forestry Investigation and Planning Research Institute of Tibet Autonomous Region, Lhasa 850000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2024, 10(5), 460; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10050460
Submission received: 9 April 2024 / Revised: 28 April 2024 / Accepted: 29 April 2024 / Published: 30 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Propagation and Seeds)

Abstract

:
Hippophae gyantsensis Lian is a pioneering tree species in Chinese forestry ecological engineering, known for its robust stress tolerance, water retention capacity, and soil improvement qualities. However, the lack of rapid nursery technology has been a significant impediment to the development of the H. gyantsensis industry. In the present study, we have successfully established a tissue culture regeneration system for H. gyantsensis. The most effective methods for seed disinfection, ensuring sterility in seedlings, were found to be 75% alcohol disinfection for 40 s and 10% sodium hypochlorite disinfection for 10 min. The best media tested for callus induction in cotyledons and hypocotyls of sterile seedlings were 1/3 MS + 0.5 mg/L KT + 0.75 mg/L NAA and 1/3 MS + 0.3 mg/L 6-BA + 1.5 mg/L IBA, respectively. As the explants, cotyledons yielded larger calli with a greater size and differentiation ability than hypocotyls. For the induction of indeterminate shoots and proliferation, the most suitable media were 1/3 MS + 0.5 mg/L IAA + 0.75 mg/L 6-BA and 1/3 MS + 1.0 mg/L 6-BA + 0.05 mg/L IBA + 0.1 mg/L KT, respectively. Lastly, the best worked rooting formulation was 1/4 MS + 0.3 mg/L IBA. This study marks a significant milestone in the establishment of a systematic tissue culture regeneration system for H. gyantsensis, which will facilitate the industrial rapid propagation of high-quality seedlings and provide the foundation for improvement through genetic transformation.

1. Introduction

Hippophae gyantsensis Lian is a member of the genus Hippophae (seabuckthorn) in the family Elaeagnaceae [1], distributed in the riverbed gravel land or river floodplain at an altitude of 3500–3800 m exclusively in Tibet [2]. This heliophilous species is tolerant to cold, heat, salt, and drought with high soil adaptability, making it an excellent native tree for water retention, soil fixation, and reforestation of barren mountains [3]. As a non-leguminous woody nitrogen-fixing tree, it can form root nodules in symbiosis with Frankia to enrich the soil with nitrogen and enhance soil fertility [2], thus providing important ecological benefits. Furthermore, H. gyantsensis holds tremendous medicinal potential. Its roots, stems, leaves, flowers, and fruits contain flavonoids, vitamins, superoxide dismutase, and various other nutrients and active ingredients [4,5], which are capable of treating coronary heart disease, tumors, and other diseases [6], bringing it substantial value for both ecological and industrial applications.
Currently, the propagation of H. gyantsensis mainly relies on seedling and young branch cuttings [7,8]. The proportion of female plants propagated by seed is often lower than that of male plants, which is not in line with the intensive cultivation requirements and is unable to meet the social production demands. Furthermore, seabuckthorn explants have a limited range of options, with a diverse array of endophytic microorganisms that make thorough sterilization challenging. Through the adventitious regeneration system, small explant fragments can be utilized more easily for experimentation and propagation, without being constrained by the quantity of pre-existing buds. Combined with the potential of transformation for genetic improvement, a stable efficient, and rapid tissue culture propagation system for H. gyantsensis needs to be established.
There have been some reports on tissue culture of different species of seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.). The best explants for tissue culture of H. rhamnoides subsp. sinensis Rousi were the cotyledons of in vitro seedlings, and the highest shoot differentiation rate was achieved on 1/4 MS + 0.3 mg/L 6-BA + 0.002 mg/L NAA medium [9]. In the study of “YOUSHENG” of H. rhamnoides L. from Russia, the basal media for stem segments to induce adventitious shoots, calli, and roots were 1/2 MS, 1/3 MS, and 1/4 MS, respectively [10]. In the hybrid cultivar Julia (H. r. ssp mongolica × H. r. ssp. rhamnoides), it was found that TDZ significantly promoted the induction of adventitious shoots and the combination of TDZ and BA was able to promote shoot organogenesis [11]. In these seabuckthorns, it was found that under the same concentration, KIN induced somatic embryos better than BA, and the somatic embryogenesis and germination rates of cotyledons as explants were higher than those of leaves and hypocotyls [12]. Although the tissue culture regeneration system of many species of seabuckthorn has been established, none has been reported for H. gyantsensis to the best of our knowledge. Therefore, the present study explored the effects of different explants and different combinations of plant growth regulators on tissue culture regeneration based on aseptic seedlings cultivated from the seeds of H. gyantsensis, and we established a regeneration system to lay a foundation for the subsequent selection and improvement of H. gyantsensis resources.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

The seeds of Hippophae gyantsensis Lian. were collected from one mother plant in Gyantse, Tibet, in 2022, and preserved in the laboratory of Nanjing Forestry University.

2.2. Cultivation of In Vitro Seedlings of H. gyantsensis

The seeds were thoroughly cleaned, immersed in warm water at 20~25 °C for 24 h, peeled off episperm, and then treated with different combinations of disinfection using 75% ethanol (Shandong Lierkang Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Dezhou, China) and sodium hypochlorite (4.5~5.0% active chlorine; Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China, CAS: 7681-52-9) (Table 1). The disinfected and drained seeds were inoculated on 1/2 MS medium (Murashige and Skoog medium (MS); Qingdao Hope Bio-Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China, CAS: HB8469-5), with 7.5 g/L agar (Guangzhou Saiguo Biotech Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China, CAS: 9002-18-0). The size of the culture jars was 240 mL, the caliber was 6.5 cm, the diameter was 6.8 cm, and the height was 9.2 cm. About 50 mL of medium was distributed in the culture jars, and each bottle contained five seeds, for a total of 60 bottles. They were placed at 25 °C under a 16 h light/8 h dark cycle (LED light intensity of 2000 lx) in the room to obtain tissue culture seedlings for later study. After 20 days, the contamination rate (the number of contaminated seeds/the number of inoculated seeds) and germination rate (the number of in vitro seedlings/the number of seeds) of H. gyantsensis were counted. The experiment was repeated three times.

2.3. Induction Culture of Callus

In the callus regeneration experiments, cotyledon and hypocotyl explants from 20-day-old seedlings germinated in vitro, were used. In the cotyledons, two cuts were made perpendicular to the main vein and the hypocotyls were cuts into 1–1.5 cm. Explants were inoculated into calli induction media with different combinations of plant growth regulators (cytokinin and auxin), including 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA) or kinetin (KT), plus 3-indolebutyric acid (IBA), 1-naphthylacetic acid (NAA), and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) (Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) (Table 2). According to previous reports on callus induction in other Hippophae species [10,13,14], 1/3 MS was the best basal medium for most combinations, except that when 2,4-D was used alone, 1/4 MS worked better [9]. Therefore, 1/3 MS with 30 g/L sucrose and 6 g/L agar was used as the basal medium for the B1-B7 treatments, while 1/4 MS with 35 g/L sucrose and 7.5 g/L agar was used for the B8 and B9 treatments when 2,4-D was used alone. In each medium, 60 explants were inoculated (3 explants/jar). The cultures were placed in the dark at 24 °C in the culture room. The experiment was repeated three times. The induction rate (the number of explants forming callus tissue/the number of inoculated explants) of each treatment was recorded after 20 days.

2.4. Induction and Proliferation of Adventitious Shoots

Six combinations of plant growth regulators, including 6-BA, IBA, IAA, KT, and NAA, were used in the treatment (Table 3). According to previous reports on callus induction in other Hippophae species [13,15,16], the combination of 6-BA (0.5 mg/L~0.75 mg/L) and IAA (0.5 mg/L) showed the best proliferation effect. And the concentration range was controlled from 0.1 to 0.5 mg/L for IBA, from 0.2 to 1.0 mg/L for KT, and from 0.004 to 0.2 mg/L for NAA. The calli were transferred to adventitious shoot induction media (1/3 MS with 30 g/L sucrose and 6 g/L agar as the basal medium). The cultures were placed in a 16 h light/8 h dark cycle at 24 °C in the culture room. Each bottle contained four callus pieces from different explants. The browning rate of the calli (the number of browned callus tissues/the number of total callus tissues) was calculated. Three replications of each treatment were used in the proliferation culture, and the total number of calluses used per treatment was 96. After the adventitious shoots reached a height of about 1 cm, the shooting rate (the number of calli with induced adventitious shoots/the number of callus tissues) was measured after 60 days.

2.5. Rooting Induction of Adventitious Shoots

Different types and concentrations of 6-BA, IBA, and NAA were set up for treatment using 1/4 MS with 35 g/L sucrose and 6 g/L agar as the basal media (Table 4). The clumped seedlings of 2–4 cm in height and robust growth in the proliferation culture were selected, cut down singly, and transplanted into the root induction media. With ten bottles per treatment, three seedlings per bottle, and three repetitions, the total number of shoots used per treatment was 90. The rooting status of the adventitious shoots was observed, and the rooting rate (the number of adventitious shoots which induced roots/the number of adventitious shoots) was recorded after 40 days.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

In this experiment, the data were subjected to analysis of variance and the significance of differences among the mean values was carried out using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at p < 0.05 using SPSS software, version 19.0, and Microsoft Office Excel 2016. The results were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of triplicates.

3. Results

3.1. Disinfection of Seeds for Germination of Hippophae gyantsensis

Seeds of H. gyantsensis Lian treated with different disinfection combinations were inoculated onto germination 1/2 MS medium. It was observed that the seeds sprouted after 3 days, the seed coats came off in about 15 days, and the cotyledons spread out in about 20 days (Figure 1). The rate of contamination-free seeds showed significant differences among the six different disinfection treatments, with a significant increase as the duration of disinfection increased (Table 5). The germination was not affected by the different treatments since the uncontaminated seeds were all germinated at 100%. The best disinfection treatment combination was 75% alcohol disinfection for 40 s, followed by 10% sodium hypochlorite disinfection for 10 min, after which the treatment with 0% contamination could be observed (Table 5). All the seeds were germinated and the seedlings grew to 4–5 cm in 20 days. These seedlings of H. gyantsensis were obtained to be used as the starting material for the subsequent regeneration experiments.

3.2. Callus Induction of H. gyantsensis

The cotyledons induced calli at about 10 days, after which the calli gradually proliferated and became larger along the incision site at about 20 days (Figure 2). The B1, B2, and B3 treatments, which were combinations of 6-BA and IBA, all had white-colored calli, and the callus induction rate increased with increasing IBA concentrations (Table 6). The calli of B4-B9 were all transparent-colored granules. B4 and B5 were combinations of NAA and 6-BA, and the calli browned slightly when the concentration of NAA was 0.5 mg/L. However, the growth of the calli decreased but did not turn brown when the concentration of NAA was reduced to 0.3 mg/L. B6 and B7 were combinations of KT and NAA, and these two combinations of cotyledons induced the best growth state of calli. As the concentration of NAA increased, the calli grew more, faster, and tighter without browning and had the potential to continue to differentiate. In addition, we found that cotyledons in the B1-B7 treatments produced a small number of adventitious roots with white fluff. B8 and B9 were the media with only the auxin 2,4-D added, which induced calli with fast growth and clumping at the initial stage, but with serious vitrification and browning, loose texture, and a very low differentiation rate at the later stage. In the case of the B8 medium with only 0.3 mg/L 2,4-D, the calli hardly differentiated at the later stage.
The hypocotyls were obviously expanded in the B3 medium, and the calli showed a transparent state, with the best effect of proliferation and differentiation in the later stage. The phenomenon of inducing the calli of hypocotyls in B8 and B9 was the same as that of the cotyledons, with rapid growth in the early stage, and serious browning in the later stage, which might have led to the death of the explants directly. The B9 medium with the addition of 2,4-D at 0.5 mg/L showed the slight emergence of axillary buds but very slow growth in the later stages. Except for the B6 and B8 combinations, which did not have axillary buds sprouting during the callus induction, the axillary buds of all the combinations started sprouting at around 5 days (Figure 2; Table 7).
The results show that both the cotyledons and the hypocotyls had a high callus induction rate. According to the time and rate of calli induction, the best medium for the cotyledon induction of H. gyantsensis calli was B7: 1/3 MS + 0.5 mg/L KT + 0.75 mg/L NAA, and for hypocotyl calli induction, it was B3: 1/3 MS + 0.3 mg/L 6-BA + 1.5 mg/L IBA. Compared to the hypocotyls, the cotyledons produced larger calli, and the number of cotyledons and yield were higher in the factory nursery process. Therefore, the cotyledons could be chosen as the explants in the tissue culture for the rapid propagation system of H. gyantsensis, which is more efficient and high-yielding.

3.3. Induction and Proliferation of Adventitious Shoots of H. gyantsensis

The calli were selected and transferred to the adventitious shoot induction medium, and the cotyledon and hypocotyl calli both grew further, appearing as light green and tightly clustered, leading to the formation of green adventitious shoot spots. This gradually developed into adventitious shoots with leaves (Figure 3a–f). This indicates that the six different treatments significantly affected the induction and proliferation of the adventitious shoots of H. gyantsensis (Table 8; Figure 3). C1, C2, and C3 were the combinations of 6-BA and IAA. When the 6-BA concentration was 0.75 mg/L, the hypocotyl calli of H. gyantsensis proliferated and differentiated the fastest, with the largest volume, the largest number of green shoots, and the highest proliferation coefficient (up to 52.6%). C4 and C5 compared the effects of the auxins IBA and KT, and it was found that the C4 medium with KT was characterized by faster and more differentiation of calli, relatively vigorous growth of adventitious shoots, and the lowest browning mortality rate in the C4 medium compared to that without KT. In C6, the adventitious roots continued to grow due to the addition of NAA, and the root tips were blackened at a later stage, thus reducing the rate of differentiation of the calli.
When the adventitious shoots increased to more than 1.5 cm, they were transferred to the proliferation medium (C4) and could grow into small shoots after 30 days (Figure 3g). Each hypocotyl-induced callus could produce 1–2 shoots, with 1 in most cases, while each cotyledon-induced callus could produce 3–5 shoots. Therefore, the best medium for inducing the adventitious shoot from calli was C2: 1/3 MS + 0.5 mg/L IAA + 0.75 mg/L 6-BA, and the best proliferation medium was C4: 1/3 MS + 1.0 mg/L 6-BA + 0.05 mg/L IBA + 0.1 mg/L KT.

3.4. Induction and Proliferation of Adventitious Roots of H. gyantsensis

Vigorously growing shoots were inoculated into various rooting media, and significant differences in the rooting rate were observed (Table 9; Figure 4). In D1, D2, and D4 media, no roots were produced. In the D3 medium, white roots were observed emerging from the base of the shoots after 20 days. Although the developed root system appeared robust, the rooting process was slow, and there was evidence of proliferating callus tissue in the root zone. This phenomenon exerts inhibitory effects on the rooting induction process, leading to slow growth and gradually deteriorated condition of the resulting plantlet in the later stage, with yellowing and withering of the leaves, which did not meet the requirements for fast tissue culture propagation. In the D5 and D6 treatments, in which IBA was used, the rooting rate was as high as 77.8% when the IBA concentration was 0.3 mg/L, and roots emerged after 12 days. In the D5 treatment, two primary roots were differentiated per shoot on average, with a 1.5 cm root length achieved in 30 days. When the lateral roots were formed, compared to D6, the roots of D5 were longer and slimmer and the growth of the root system and the plantlets was optimal. Therefore, the most suitable medium for rooting induction was D5: 1/4 MS + 0.3 mg/L IBA.

4. Discussion

4.1. Cultivation of In Vitro Seedlings of H. gyantsensis

In the seabuckthorn tissue culture regeneration system, various explants can be chosen, including wild stem segments with axillary buds, stem tips, and water-cultivated leaves as explants [17]. Alternatively, the cultivation can begin from seed-grown in vitro seedings. Xu [9] and Yang [18] used H. rhamnoides in vitro seedlings to establish a tissue culture system, which not only eliminated the obstacle of wild sampling leading to sterilization difficulties but also improved the tissue culture success rate. After disinfection with mercury dichloride solution, the seeds were inoculated into a 1/2 MS medium, resulting in a germination rate of 60%, with the seedlings being weak and exhibiting slow growth [18]. Additionally, following disinfection with 75% alcohol and mercury dichloride for 10 min, there were notable differences in the seed germination across the MS, 1/2 MS, and 1/4 MS culture media. Under identical cultivation conditions, the seeds exhibited the highest germination rate in the 1/2 MS medium at 16.67%, followed by 1/4 MS, with a germination rate of 13.33%. In contrast, the germination rate in MS was observed to be 3.33% [19].
Therefore, in this study, we cultivated in vitro seedlings of H. gyantsensis and used different tissues of the in vitro seedlings as the explants for tissue culture experiments, which greatly reduced the contamination rate and improved the experimental efficiency. For the seeds used, the best disinfection was 75% alcohol for 40 s and 10% sodium hypochlorite for 10 min; the seeds exhibited a remarkable 100% germination rate. In the in vitro seedling cultivation process of H. gyantsensis, 1/2 MS was used as the basic medium, and the massive element concentration was halved to be more suitable for seed germination, which is consistent with the studies of Liu [19] and Zheng [20].

4.2. Effects of Different Explants on the Callus Induction of H. gyantsensis

There have been many reports on Hippophae L. tissue culture regeneration using different explants. Axillary buds, stem segments, and leaves of plants have been selected as explants for research, but there has not been any report on H. gyantsensis [15]. Lv [21] discovered that the germination rate of stem tip explants consistently exceeded 90% in the culture medium of 1/2 B5 + 0.5–1.0 mg/L 6-BA + 0.3~0.5 mg/L IAA. The study revealed that apical shoot explants in the culture medium of 1/2 MS + 0.3–0.5 mg/L KT + 0.03–0.05 mg/L NAA achieved an axillary bud induction rate of 85% [17]. In another study, Liu [22] inoculated in vitro seedings segments in 1/2 MS + 0.5–1.0 mg/L 6-BA + 0.5 mg/L IAA, and the callus induction rate exceeded 91.3%. Liu [23] found that the most suitable culture medium for callus induction in H. rhamnoides subsp. Sinensis and H. rhamnoides subsp. Mongolica consists of 1/3 MS + 6-BA 0.5 mg/L + IBA 1.0 mg/L, with an induction rate reaching 75.9%.
In this study, the cotyledons and hypocotyls of the in vitro seedlings of H. gyantsensis were selected as the explants for the experiment. The results show that both explants formed calli in about 10 days at a high rate. Except for the cotyledons on the 1/3 MS medium supplemented with 0.3 mg/L 6-BA and 0.5 mg/L IBA, and 0.3 mg/L 6-BA and 1.0 mg/L IBA, all reached 100%. But the cotyledon calli were larger in size and more capable of differentiation, and the following adventitious shoots grew robustly and vigorously compared to the shoots differentiated from the hypocotyl calli. Therefore, the cotyledons of the in vitro seedlings are more suitable as explants for callus induction in the H. gyantsensis tissue culture regeneration system. It is worth noting that the somaclonal variation can be obtained through this indirect organogenesis [24], which should be considered in the process of propagation and breeding.

4.3. Effects of Different Plant Growth Regulators on the Tissue Culture of H. gyantsensis

In this study, it was found that the cotyledons and hypocotyls of in vitro seedlings of H. gyantsensis formed calli quickly in medium with only 2,4-D, but at the same time, browning followed soon and could not be differentiated. This result is in agreement with the conclusions of Li [14] and Xu [9]. In the study on “YOUSHENG” of Hippophae rhamnoides L. from Russia [10], it was found that when IAA was 0.2 mg/L and 6-BA was 1 mg/L or 0.5 mg/L, the callus induction rate of explants was high, but they all browned and died at 20 days. When the concentration of 6-BA was less than 0.5 mg/L, the calli were in good condition. Therefore, in our experiment, the 6-BA concentration was controlled at 0.3 mg/L when inducing calli, which effectively inhibited browning.
A study on Hippophae rhamnoides ‘Real gifted one’ using stem segments with dormant buds as explants found that the best medium for proliferation and callus induction was 1/3 MS + 0.75 mg/L 6-BA + 0.5 mg/L IAA, and the induction rate was as high as 91% [25], which is consistent with our results. In addition, we found that the proliferation and differentiation rate of the callus decreased when the concentration of 6-BA was greater than 0.75 mg/L. Hybrids of seabuckthorn grew best at WPM + 0.6 mg/L BA + 0.03 mg/L IBA, and the rooting rate can reach 100% [26]. In our study, we tried the combination of 1/3 MS with 1.0 mg/L 6-BA and 0.05 mg/L IBA and found that the medium with a reduced IBA concentration combined with KT showed the best proliferation. Also, the combination of 6-BA, KT, and NAA (C6) was tried, and the results show that embryoids were produced in the hypocotyl near the cotyledon end.
The rooting of seabuckthorn varieties ‘Ze liang’ and ‘Xiang yang’ with 1/2 B5 + 0.15–0.18 mg/L 6-BA + 0.2 mg/L IBA and 1/2 B5 + 0.5 mg/L KT + 0.03–0.07 mg/L NAA were preferred; the rooting rates were 90% and 86.67%, respectively [27]. The seabuckthorn variety ‘Real gifted one’ is better with 1/2 B5 + 0.1 mg/L 6-BA + 1.0 mg/L NAA, and a rooting rate of 85% was reached [28]. In this study, two combinations of IBA and NAA were designed, and it was found that none of the seedlings of H. gyantsensis rooted, but all of them rooted in the medium with only IBA, which indicate that IBA is more suitable for the root growth of H. gyantsensis. In the formulation of 1/4 MS + 0.3 mg/L 6-BA + 0.5 mg/L IBA, the root system of H. gyantsensis also grew, but the root growth was slow, and the plant proliferation phenomenon affected the normal growth of the root system, so the most suitable media for the root induction of H. gyantsensis was 1/4 MS + 0.3 mg/L IBA. In order to improve the rooting rate, Xu soaked the bases of regenerated Hippophae rhamnoides subsp. sinensis Rousi plants in the rooting agent solution for 15 min and then transferred them to the rooting medium, which not only improved the rooting rate but also shortened the rooting time significantly and developed the root system [9]. Therefore, further study can focus on the most suitable rooting agent solution and soaking time for H. gyantsensis to promote root growth.

5. Conclusions

To establish an efficient regeneration system for tissue culture, an experiment was carried out with H. gyantsensis as the material under a variety of plant growth regulators types and concentrations. This study established the best disinfection method for sterile seedlings. The best culture media were determined for calli, adventitious shoots, and adventitious roots using the cotyledons and epicotyls of the sterile seedlings as explant materials. In general, this is the first time the tissue culture regeneration system of H. gyantsensis has been established, which lays the foundation for the subsequent genetic improvement of H. gyantsensis and provides a reference for the nursery factory.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.F. and F.C.; methodology, A.Z., W.X., P.X., X.Z., Y.W., A.X. and Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, W.X. and X.Z.; writing—review and editing, A.Z., Y.Z. and A.O.; project administration, F.F.; funding acquisition, F.F. and F.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32101559) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20200770).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in the present study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the Forestry Bureau of Gyantse County, Tibet, for providing the seeds.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Jia, D.R.; Wang, Y.J.; Liu, T.L.; Wu, G.L.; Kou, Y.X.; Cheng, K.; Liu, J.Q. Diploid Hybrid Origin of Hippophaë gyantsensis (Elaeagnaceae) in the Western Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2016, 117, 658–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tian, C.; He, X.; Zhong, Y.; Chen, J. Effects of VA Mycorrhizae and Frankia Dual Inoculation on Growth and Nitrogen Fixation of Hippophae tibetana. For. Ecol. Manag. 2002, 170, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, T.S.C.; Schroeder, W.R. Sea Buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.): A Multipurpose Plant. HortTechnology 1996, 6, 370–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Skuridin, G.M.; Chankina, O.V.; Legkodymov, A.A.; Kreimer, V.K.; Baginskaya, N.V.; Koutzenogii, K.P. Trace Element Composition of Common Sea Buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) Tissues. Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 2013, 77, 207–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Patel, C.A.; Divakar, K.; Santani, D.; Solanki, H.K.; Thakkar, J.H. Remedial Prospective of Hippophae rhamnoides Linn. (Sea Buckthorn). ISRN Pharmacol. 2012, 2012, 436857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Żuchowski, J. Phytochemistry and Pharmacology of Sea Buckthorn (Elaeagnus rhamnoides; syn. Hippophae rhamnoides): Progress from 2010 to 2021. Phytochem. Rev. 2023, 22, 3–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bartish, I.V.; Jeppsson, N.; Nybom, H.; Swenson, U. Phylogeny of Hippophae (Elaeagnaceae) Inferred from Parsimony Analysis of Chloroplast DNA and Morphology. Syst. Bot. 2002, 27, 41–54. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dolkar, P.; Dolkar, D.; Angmo, S.; Srivastava, R.; Stobdan, T. An Improved Method for Propagation of Seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) by Cuttings. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 2016, 39, 323–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, H.; Liang, Z.S. Studies of Tissue Culture Techniques of Hippophae L. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 2001, 21, 267–272+393–394. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kang, B.; Zhang, G.J.; Lv, Y.L.; Li, W.H.; Zhang, X.H.; Zhang, J.X.; Cao, J.J. Studies on Tissue Culture of Fine Variety of Hippophae rhamnoides L. from Russia. J. Northwest Sci-Tech Univ. Agric. For. 2002, 30, 162–166. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sriskandarajah, S.; Lundquist, P.-O. High Frequency Shoot Organogenesis and Somatic Embryogenesis in Juvenile and Adult Tissues of Seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2009, 99, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, C.Q.; Xia, X.L.; Yin, W.L.; Zhou, J.H.; Tang, H.R. Direct Somatic Embryogenesis from Leaves, Cotyledons and Hypocotyls of Hippophae Rhamnoides. Biol. Plant 2007, 51, 635–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dong, J.C. Research on the Rapid Propagation Technology of Seabuckthorn Tissue Culture. Bull. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2015, 6, 160–162+291. [Google Scholar]
  14. Li, S.W.; Fan, X.F.; Lv, D.P. Studies on Callus Inducement and Plant Regeneration of Hippophae rhamnoides L. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 2001, 21, 262–266+392. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wu, T.; Zhao, Y.; Han, X. Research Advances on Establishment of Seabuckthorn Tissue Culture System. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2019, 47, 10–12. [Google Scholar]
  16. Qin, J.J.; Chen, W.; Sun, K. Research Progress on Tissue Culture of Hippophae rhamnoides L. North. Hortic. 2011, 1, 212–215. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sun, L.Y. A Study on Seabuckthorn Tissue Culture and Plant Regeneration. Glob. Seabuckthorn Res. Dev. 2004, 3, 28–30. [Google Scholar]
  18. Yang, J.X.; Liu, J.P. Gain of Axenic Explant of Hippophae rhamnoides. Prot. For. Sci. Technol. 2007, S1, 37–39. [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, L.; Li, W.; Ruan, C.-J. Optimization of the Basic Medium for Seeds Germination in Sea Buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides). J. Dalian Minzu Univ. 2016, 18, 469–472. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zheng, Z.C.; He, S.Q. Tissue Culture Techniques of Hippopae rhamnoides L. J. Cent. South For. Univ. 2003, 23, 42–45. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lv, Y.L.; Zhang, G.J.; Kang, B. A Study on Quick Reproduction by Excised Culture of Hippophae rhamnoides L. J. Hunan Agric. Univ. 2002, 28, 405–407. [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, H.T. Siberian Sea Buckthorn Variety “Shiyou 1” Stem Segment Tissue Culture Study. Bull. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2018, 6, 145–147. [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu, Z.H.; Jie, Q.; Li, Z.Q. Study on the Induction of Embryogenic Callus Differentiation of Hippophae rhamnoides. J. Shanxi Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2018, 38, 15–19. [Google Scholar]
  24. Chen, M.Q.; Liu, G.; Lin, Y.; Huang, A.Y.; Zhai, J.B.; Luo, J.Z. Research Progress in Tissue Culture and Organ de Novo Regeneration of Woody Plants. Eucalypt Sci. Technol. 2023, 40, 85–96. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dong, J.C. Study on Tissue Culture of Hippophae rhamnoides ‘Real Gifted One’. North. Hortic. 2012, 19, 127–130. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yu, Y.J.; Xia, X.L.; Yin, W.L. In Vitro Plant Regeneration from a Drought-Resistant Filial Generation of Hippophae rhamnoides L. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2010, 32, 52–56. [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu, J.; Jiang, L.Y.; Wang, J.Y.; Liu, X.Y.; Fan, B.L.; Wang, Z.Y. Optimization of Regeneration Culture System from Wheat Mature Embryos. J. Tianjin Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2016, 36, 59–64. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhou, J.; Zhang, L.J.; Yue, D.M.; Chen, G. In Vitro Propagation of Hippophae rhamnoides. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2005, 33, 236–237+249. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The development process of in vitro germination of H. gyantsensis. (a) Sprouting at 3 days after incubation. (b) Seedlings at 15 days after incubation. (c) Seedlings at 20 days after incubation.
Figure 1. The development process of in vitro germination of H. gyantsensis. (a) Sprouting at 3 days after incubation. (b) Seedlings at 15 days after incubation. (c) Seedlings at 20 days after incubation.
Horticulturae 10 00460 g001
Figure 2. Calli of H. gyantsensis induced by different combinations of plant growth regulators. (ai) Calli induced by B1–B9 media, respectively.
Figure 2. Calli of H. gyantsensis induced by different combinations of plant growth regulators. (ai) Calli induced by B1–B9 media, respectively.
Horticulturae 10 00460 g002
Figure 3. Induction and proliferation of adventitious shoots of H. gyantsensis under different treatments. (af) Adventitious shoots grown under the C1–C6 treatments, respectively. (g) Multiplication seedlings of H. gyantsensis.
Figure 3. Induction and proliferation of adventitious shoots of H. gyantsensis under different treatments. (af) Adventitious shoots grown under the C1–C6 treatments, respectively. (g) Multiplication seedlings of H. gyantsensis.
Horticulturae 10 00460 g003
Figure 4. Rooting of H. gyantsensis shoots under different treatments: (a) D3 (0.3 mg/L 6-BA + 0.5 mg/L IBA), (b) D5 (0.3 mg/L IBA), and (c) D6 (0.5 mg/L IBA) treatments in Table 9, respectively.
Figure 4. Rooting of H. gyantsensis shoots under different treatments: (a) D3 (0.3 mg/L 6-BA + 0.5 mg/L IBA), (b) D5 (0.3 mg/L IBA), and (c) D6 (0.5 mg/L IBA) treatments in Table 9, respectively.
Horticulturae 10 00460 g004
Table 1. Disinfection treatment of H. gyantsensis.
Table 1. Disinfection treatment of H. gyantsensis.
TreatmentDisinfection Method
A175% alcohol 30 s → rinse 3 times → 5% sodium hypochlorite 5 min → rinse 4 times
A275% alcohol 30 s → rinse 3 times → 5% sodium hypochlorite 8 min → rinse 4 times
A375% alcohol 40 s → rinse 3 times → 5% sodium hypochlorite 5 min → rinse 4 times
A475% alcohol 40 s → rinse 3 times → 5% sodium hypochlorite 8 min → rinse 4 times
A575% alcohol 40 s → rinse 3 times → 10% sodium hypochlorite 8 min → rinse 4 times
A675% alcohol 40 s → rinse 3 times → 10% sodium hypochlorite 10 min → rinse 4 times
Table 2. Different combinations of plant growth regulators for callus induction of H. gyantsensis.
Table 2. Different combinations of plant growth regulators for callus induction of H. gyantsensis.
TreatmentPlant Growth Regulators (mg/L)
CytokininAuxin
6-BAKTIBANAA2,4-D
B10.3-0.5--
B20.3-1--
B30.3-1.5--
B40.3--0.5-
B50.3--0.75-
B6-0.5-0.3-
B7-0.5-0.75-
B8----0.3
B9----0.5
Note: Basal medium in treatments B1 to B7: 1/3 MS, 30 g/L sucrose, 6 g/L agar. Treatments B8 and B9: 1/4 MS, 35 g/L sucrose, and 7.5 g/L agar.
Table 3. Adventitious shoot differentiation and proliferation media for H. gyantsensis.
Table 3. Adventitious shoot differentiation and proliferation media for H. gyantsensis.
TreatmentPlant Growth Regulators (mg/L)
CytokininAuxin
6-BAKTIAAIBANAA
C10.5-0.5--
C20.75-0.5--
C31-0.5--
C410.1-0.05-
C51--0.5-
C60.50.2--0.1
Note: C1 to C6 were based on 1/3 MS as the basal medium.
Table 4. Adventitious root differentiation and proliferation media for H. gyantsensis.
Table 4. Adventitious root differentiation and proliferation media for H. gyantsensis.
TreatmentConcentration of Plant Growth Regulators (mg/L)
CytokininAuxin
6-BAIBANAA
D1-0.50.3
D2-0.50.5
D30.30.5-
D40.50.5-
D5-0.3-
D6-0.5-
Note: D1 to D6 were based on 1/4 MS as the basal medium.
Table 5. Effects of different disinfection treatments on contamination of H. gyantsensis.
Table 5. Effects of different disinfection treatments on contamination of H. gyantsensis.
TreatmentNumber of
Seeds
Number of
Contamination-Free Seeds
Contamination-Free
Rate (%)
A1504182.00 ± 1.00 a
A2504284.00 ± 2.00 a
A3504590.00 ± 2.00 b
A4504590.00 ± 1.00 b
A5504896.00 ± 1.00 c
A65050100.00 ± 0.00 d
Note: A1 to A6 represent the treatment methods: (A1) 75% alcohol disinfection for 30 s and 5% sodium hypochlorite disinfection for 5 min; (A2) 75% alcohol disinfection for 30 s and 5% sodium hypochlorite disinfection for 8 min; (A3) 75% alcohol disinfection for 40 s and 5% sodium hypochlorite disinfection for 5 min; (A4) 75% alcohol disinfection for 40 s and 5% sodium hypochlorite disinfection for 8 min; (A5) 75% alcohol disinfection for 40 s and 10% sodium hypochlorite disinfection for 8 min; (A6) 75% alcohol disinfection for 40 s and 10% sodium hypochlorite disinfection for 10 min. The data presented were taken 20 days from the beginning of the incubation. Germination medium: 1/2 solid MS medium. Duncan’s analysis was used, and different lowercase letters indicate the significant differences among the different treatments (p < 0.05, n = 3).
Table 6. Callus induction from the cotyledons of H. gyantsensis under different combinations of plant growth regulators.
Table 6. Callus induction from the cotyledons of H. gyantsensis under different combinations of plant growth regulators.
TreatmentDays to
Calli Appearing
Callus Induction Rates (%)Development and Growth of Calli
B11369.23 ± 10.14 cSmall amount
B21290.00 ± 3.27 bSmall amount
B312100.00 ± 0.00 aSmall amount, loose, transparent
B412100.00 ± 0.00 aTransparent color of callus at the incision site
B513100.00 ± 0.00 aTransparent-colored, dense, and slightly browned callus at the incision site
B613100.00 ± 0.00 aCallus at the incision site, transparent color
B77100.00 ± 0.00 aBest growth, dense, transparent granular
B88100.00 ± 0.00 aLoose, browning fastest, and no differentiation in later stages
B98100.00 ± 0.00 aLoose, browned and vitrified
Note: B1 to B9 represent different treatments: (B1) 0.3 mg/L 6-BA + 0.5 mg/L IBA; (B2) 0.3 mg/L 6-BA + 1.0 mg/L IBA; (B3) 0.3 mg/L 6-BA + 1.5 mg/L IBA; (B4) 0.3 mg/L 6-BA + 0.5 mg/L NAA; (B5) 0.3 mg/L 6-BA + 0.75 mg/L IBA; (B6) 0.3 mg/LNAA + 0.5 mg/L KT; (B7) 0.75 mg/LNAA + 0.5 mg/L KT; (B8) 0.3 mg/L 2,4-D; (B9) 0.5 mg/L 2,4-D. Data taken after 20 days. Different lowercase letters among treatments indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s analysis (p < 0.05, n = 3).
Table 7. Callus induction from the hypocotyls of H. gyantsensis under different combinations of plant growth regulators.
Table 7. Callus induction from the hypocotyls of H. gyantsensis under different combinations of plant growth regulators.
TreatmentDays to
Callus Appearing
Average Shoot
Height at 20 Days
Callus Induction Rates (%)Status of Callus Growth and Development
B161100.00 ± 0.00 aStems slightly expanded at both ends
B250.4100.00 ± 0.00 aStem segments expanded
B351.7100.00 ± 0.00 aStem segments expanded noticeably, sprouting quickly
B450.3100.00 ± 0.00 aStem segments expanded and callus transparent
B540.2100.00 ± 0.00 aStem segments expanded, easily browned, and callus transparent
B600100.00 ± 0.00 aStems expanded at both ends and transparent
B720.2100.00 ± 0.00 aStems slightly expanded at both ends and transparent
B800100.00 ± 0.00 aInitial stem segments visibly expanded, transparent, and browning fastest
B900100.00 ± 0.00 aInitial stem segments expanded, transparent, and browning fast
Note: B1 to B9 represent different treatment methods: (B1) 0.3 mg/L 6-BA + 0.5 mg/L IBA; (B2) 0.3 mg/L 6-BA + 1.0 mg/L IBA; (B3) 0.3 mg/L 6-BA + 1.5 mg/L IBA; (B4) 0.3 mg/L 6-BA + 0.5 mg/L NAA; (B5) 0.3 mg/L 6-BA + 0.75 mg/L IBA; (B6) 0.3 mg/LNAA + 0.5 mg/L KT; (B7) 0.75 mg/LNAA + 0.5 mg/L KT; (B8) 0.3 mg/L 2,4-D; (B9) 0.5 mg/L 2,4-D. The data presented were taken 20 days from the beginning of the callus induction. Duncan’s analysis was used, and different lowercase letters indicate the significant differences among the different treatments (p < 0.05, n = 3).
Table 8. The effects of different combinations of plant growth regulators on the shoot differentiation from cotyledon- and hypocotyl-induced calli of H. gyantsensis.
Table 8. The effects of different combinations of plant growth regulators on the shoot differentiation from cotyledon- and hypocotyl-induced calli of H. gyantsensis.
TreatmentShooting Rate (%)Browning
Mortality (%)
Growing Status
C128.60 ± 3.76 c25.00 ± 4.58 aGood growth of adventitious shoots
C252.60 ± 8.77 a22.20 ± 1.93 bBest differentiation of indeterminate buds of epiblast healing tissues, and the highest number of shoots.
C329.40 ± 7.65 c19.00 ± 3.47 cAverage growth of adventitious shoots
C446.20 ± 7.34 b16.70 ± 3.10 bSuitable for proliferative culture, with many indeterminate bud spots and good growth in later stages
C545.60 ± 2.57 b26.70 ± 1.39 aAverage growth of adventitious shoots
C624.10 ± 3.35 d26.50 ± 3.29 aContinued growth of adventitious roots and embryoid production from hypocotyl healing tissue
Note: Duncan’s analysis was used, and the different lowercase letters indicate the significant differences among the different treatments (p < 0.05, n = 3). C1 to C6 represent the different treatment methods: (C1) 0.5 mg/L 6-BA + 0.5 mg/L IAA; (C2) 0.75 mg/L 6-BA + 0.5 mg/L IAA; (C3) 1.0 mg/L 6-BA + 0.5 mg/L IAA; (C4) 1.0 mg/L 6-BA + 0.5 mg/L IAA; (C5) 1.0 mg/L 6-BA + 0.05 mg/L IBA + 0.1 mg/L KT; (C6) 0.5 mg/L 6-BA + 0.2 mg/L KT + 0.1 mg/L NAA. The data presented were taken 60 days from the beginning of the adventitious shoot induction.
Table 9. Effects of different plant growth regulators on rooting of H. gyantsensis shoots.
Table 9. Effects of different plant growth regulators on rooting of H. gyantsensis shoots.
TreatmentDays to Root FormationRooting Rate (%)Average Root Length (cm)
D1 00
D2 00
D32050.00 ± 0.77 b1.2
D4 00
D51377.8 ± 0.23 a1.5
D61533.3 ± 0.48 c0.8
Note: D1 to D6 treatments: (D1) 0.5 mg/L IBA + 0.3 mg/L NAA; (D2) 0.5 mg/L IBA + 0.5 mg/L NAA; (D3) 0.3 mg/L 6-BA + 0.5 mg/L IBA; (D4) 0.5 mg/L 6-BA + 0.5 mg/L IBA; (D5) 0.3 mg/L IBA; (D6) 0.5 mg/L IBA. Data taken after 40 days. In the rooting rate column, different lowercase letters indicate the significant differences among the treatments according to Duncan’s analysis (p < 0.05, n = 3).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, A.; Xu, W.; Xu, P.; Zhang, X.; Wu, Y.; Xu, A.; Zhong, Y.; Oladipo, A.; Cao, F.; Fu, F. Establishment of Tissue Culture and Regeneration System in Hippophae gyantsensis Lian. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10050460

AMA Style

Zhao A, Xu W, Xu P, Zhang X, Wu Y, Xu A, Zhong Y, Oladipo A, Cao F, Fu F. Establishment of Tissue Culture and Regeneration System in Hippophae gyantsensis Lian. Horticulturae. 2024; 10(5):460. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10050460

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Anqi, Wei Xu, Pingjun Xu, Xinxian Zhang, Yunhua Wu, Ang Xu, Yinxiao Zhong, Abiodun Oladipo, Fuliang Cao, and Fangfang Fu. 2024. "Establishment of Tissue Culture and Regeneration System in Hippophae gyantsensis Lian" Horticulturae 10, no. 5: 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10050460

APA Style

Zhao, A., Xu, W., Xu, P., Zhang, X., Wu, Y., Xu, A., Zhong, Y., Oladipo, A., Cao, F., & Fu, F. (2024). Establishment of Tissue Culture and Regeneration System in Hippophae gyantsensis Lian. Horticulturae, 10(5), 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10050460

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop