Next Article in Journal
Early Generation Selection of Potato Breeding Lines
Next Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Morpho-Anatomical and Regeneration Features of Cultivars of Actinidia kolomikta (Maxim.) Maxim
Previous Article in Journal
Morphology and Allometry of Juvenile Açaí Palms Under Cultivation Conditions in Central Amazonia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Advances in Blueberry (Vaccinium spp.) In Vitro Culture: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biological Acclimatization of Micropropagated Al-Taif Rose (Rosa damascena f. trigintipetala (Dieck) R. Keller) Plants Using Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Rhizophagus fasciculatus

by
Yaser Hassan Dewir
1,*,
Ali Mohsen Al-Ali
1,
Rashid Sultan Al-Obeed
1,
Muhammad M. Habib
1,
Jahangir A. Malik
1,
Thobayet S. Alshahrani
1,
Abdulaziz A. Al-Qarawi
1 and
Hosakatte Niranjana Murthy
2,3
1
Plant Production Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Horticultural Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Botany, Karnatak University, Dharwad 580003, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2024, 10(10), 1120; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101120
Submission received: 14 September 2024 / Revised: 9 October 2024 / Accepted: 18 October 2024 / Published: 21 October 2024

Abstract

:
Tissue culture is used to multiply Al-Taif rose (Rosa damascena f. trigintipetala (Dieck) R. Keller) plants in order to meet the demands of the fragrance, cosmetic, and floriculture industries. The use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) could potentially improve plant growth and acclimatization performance to ex vitro conditions. Thus, in the current study, we investigated how AMF Rhizophagus fasciculatus influences the growth, establishment, and physiological performance of micropropagated Al-Taif rose plants during the acclimatization stage. The growth and physiological parameters of the AMF-treated plants were evaluated after a 12 week growth period in the growth chambers. The plants treated with AMF exhibited greater height (25.53 cm) and biomass growth values for both shoot fresh weight (0.93 g/plant) and dry weight (0.030 g/plant), more leaves (11.3/plant), more leaf area (66.15 cm2), longer main roots (15.05 cm/plant), total root length (172.16 cm/plant), total root area (64.36 cm2/plant), and biomass from both fresh weight (383 mg/plant) and dry weight (80.00 mg/plant) of the plants. The plants treated with AMF also exhibited increased rates of net CO2 assimilation, stomatal conductance, and transpiration compared to the control plants. The proline content in the leaves and roots was significantly lower in the AMF-treated plants than untreated plants. The Fv/Fm ratio, which serves as an indicator of the intrinsic or maximal efficacy of Photosystem II (PSII) demonstrated a notable decline in the untreated Al-Taif rose plants. These results elucidate the advantageous impact of AMF colonization on micropropagated Al-Taif rose plants, thereby enhancing their resilience against adverse ex vitro conditions.

1. Introduction

Plant tissue culture is one of the most important applications of modern biotechnology in horticulture, especially for plant propagation and multiplication. In comparatively short amounts of time, high-quality, disease-free, and uniform planting material could be quickly propagated by in vitro plant propagation [1,2]. Large-scale propagation could be accomplished by applying bioreactor technologies and employing liquid cultures, which offer various unique advantages not attainable through conventional propagation [3]. Liquid medium and bioreactor cultures are advantageous for micropropagation because they can be used to produce and scale up large numbers of plantlets; cultures are always in contact with the medium, which facilitates easy nutrient uptake and increases growth rate; forced air supply in bioreactor cultures promotes growth and metabolism of cultured cells and organs; and handling the cultures, including inoculation and harvesting, is simple and saves time and labor [3,4]. However, a necessary step for the commercial application of in vitro technology is the successful acclimatization of micropropagated plants and their subsequent transfer to the field [5]. Micropropagated plants require acclimatization in order for the plantlets to successfully establish and survive after being transplanted to ex vitro environments, where they are subjected to changes in temperature, light intensity, and water stress conditions. In order to gradually acclimate transplants from culture to ambient relative humidity and light levels, the ex vitro acclimatization environment is typically adjusted [6]. One method for successfully acclimating plants is the use of a bioinoculant, such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF), during the ex vitro transplantation of micropropagated plants. The fungus will be able to absorb carbon compounds from the photosynthetic host plants when AMF is applied as a bioinoculant, and the host plants will gain from the fungal mycelium’s ability to transport water and mineral nutrients [7]. Several studies have shown that the colonization of AMF during the transplantation of micropropagated plantlets from axenic to ex vitro conditions led to improved rooting and survival of micropropagated plants, a reduction in transplantation shock, a shortened weaning phase, an increase in vegetative growth, modified root morphology, and a decrease in transplantation mortality, injury, and disease occurrence [8]. Successful application of mycorrhization in horticultural plants during acclimatization has been demonstrated in Citrus tangerine [9], Cocos nucifera [10], Colocasia esculenta [11], Etlingera elatior [12], Gloriosa superba [13], Hylocereus polyrhizus [14], Malus prunifolia [15], Musa accuminata [16], Philodendron bipinnatifidum [17], Physalis peruviana [18], Rubus fruitcosus [19], and Satureja khuzistanica [20].
Roses are a valuable commodity for the floriculture, food, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and medical industries [21,22]. They are available in a variety of cultivars on the global market [23]. Only a small number of the more than 200 species in the Rosa genus are used to produce essential oils. Among these, the damask rose (Rosa damasceana Mill.), a hybrid of Rosa moschaata and Rosa gallica, is grown for commercial rose oil production. Its main industrial products are rose water, oil, concentrate, and pure oil [24]. Rose essential oil is useful in the fragrance and cosmetics sectors, but it also has various medical benefits, including antibacterial, cytotoxic, and antioxidant qualities [25]. Furthermore, damask roses are quite popular as cut flowers and potted ornamental plants. Stem cuttings are typically used for propagation. Nevertheless, a key barrier to large-scale proliferation is the stem cuttings’ poor rooting ability. Additionally, plants grown traditionally showed low oil content and production [25,26]. As a result, roses propagated in vitro have been essential in producing healthy plants and large-scale multiplication of cultivars with desired features [27]. Rosa damascena f. trigintipetala (Dieck) R. Keller, also known as the Al-Taif rose, is typically propagated by micropropagation. In our earlier research, we examined the effects of cytokinins, light and dark incubation, and the use of bioreactor cultures for the regeneration of shoots in Al-Taif roses using nodal explants [28]. We showed that benzyl aminopurine (BAP) at 0.5 mg/L was optimal for shoot regeneration in Al-Taif roses, and that gibberellic acid (GA3) treatment encourages the appearance of axillary buds. Additionally, our earlier findings demonstrated that dark incubation was preferable to light for shoot proliferation and that continuous immersion bioreactor cultures increased the quantity, length, and fresh weight of the shoots. The low rooting percentage was a primary issue encountered in in vitro propagation of Al-Taif rose. Therefore, in an additional set of experiments, we examined the effects of various auxins, including 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), indole acetic acid (IAA), indole butyric acid (IBA), and naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), at concentrations of 0–0.4 mg/L; salt strength (full- and half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium); sucrose concentration (20–80 g/L); light spectra (a 2:1 or 1:2 blue/red spectral ratio, cool or warm white light at a 1:1 ratio, and fluorescent light); light intensity (photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) values of 25, 50, and 100 μmol·m−2·s−1); and activated charcoal (i.e., 0 and 0.5 g/L). The best conditions for 100% induction of adventitious roots were found to be half-strength MS media supplemented with 0.2 mg/L NAA, 80 g/L sucrose, 0.5 g/L activated charcoal, and 50 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD [29].
Numerous studies, as previously mentioned, have shown that AMF symbiosis has positive impacts on plant growth, water intake, nutrient uptake, and tolerance to environmental challenges, particularly during the acclimatization of micropropagated plants. Conversely, there are no reports on the consequences of mycorrhizal inoculation of Al-Taif rose plants grown in vitro. Rhizophagus fasciculatus (Thaxt.) C. Walker & Schüßler, earlier belonged to the genus Glomus [30], is among the prominent AMF species that form symbiotic associations with a wide range of terrestrial plants and, thereby, aid in acquisition of essential nutrients and water, as well as increase the resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stressors [31,32,33]. The current study hypothesized that inoculation with AMF is essential for enhanced growth of micropropagated plants of Al-Taif rose during the acclimatization phase. Therefore, we aimed to ascertain how AMF R. fasciculatus affected the physiological performance and growth of micropropagated Al-Taif rose plants, particularly during acclimatization.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Location and Plant Materials

This work was carried out at King Saud University’s College of Food and Agricultural Sciences’ plant tissue culture facility. Al-Taif rose axillary shoots were regenerated in vitro using Murashige and Skoog’s medium (MS) [34], supplemented with 30 g/L sucrose and 0.5 mg/L 6-benzyl amino purine, and incubated for 6 weeks in a dark environment [28]. The individual clumps of axillary shoots, measuring 3.5–4.0 cm, were separated and cultivated in a half strength MS medium (Figure 1a), which was supplemented with 80 g/L sucrose, 0.5 g/L activated charcoal, and 0.2 mg/L naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) to aid in rooting [29]. The medium was solidified using agar-agar (Duchefa, Haarlem, The Netherlands), and its pH was adjusted to 5.8 before it was autoclaved for 15 min at 121 °C and 118 kPa pressure. The cultures were kept at 25 ± 2 °C with a 16:8 h (light:dark) photoperiod and a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 50 μmol·m−2·s−1 supplied by a cool white fluorescent tube. The plantlets were taken out of the gelled media after six weeks (Figure 1b,c), washed with tap water, and then put into plastic pots (Figure 1d) that were 21.5 cm long, 4 cm tall, and 1.7 cm wide. The pots were then filled with sterile sand and soil mixture (1:1).

2.2. Preparation of AMF Inoculum and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) Treatment

The inoculum used in this experiment contained the spores of single AMF species R. fasciculatus acquired from the rhizosphere soil of Aeluropus lagopoides in the saline Sabkha habitat of Aushazia, AlQasim region (26°03′58″ N 44°07′55.6″ E). The spores were extracted from the collected samples as per the methods of Gerdman and Nicolson [35] and a trap culture was set using sterilized sand:soil mixture (1:1; w/w) as the substrate and Zea mays as a host plant. The trap culture was harvested in the sixth month of cultivation and spores were extracted from the substrate soil [35]. The extracted spores were subjected to identification on the basis of morphology (i.e., shape, surface ornamentation, color, contents, and wall structure) [36,37] and compared to the morphological descriptions of species presented in the International Culture Collection of Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (INVAM) and other literature [30,36,38,39,40], which resulted in the predominant occurrence of R. fasciculatus in the soil. Later, R. fasciculatus spores were further mass multiplied as single species inoculum with maize as a host plant. After five months, the maize vegetative part was discarded and the soil substrate containing spores (25 spores/g dry soil), infected roots, and hyphae of R. fasciculatus was used as inoculum. There were two treatment options: mycorrhizal inoculation with or without R. fasciculatus. Al-Taif rose plantlets were given an inoculum consisting of 35 spores per gram of dry soil in the Rangeland Laboratory of the Plant Production Department at King Saud University in Saudi Arabia. The autoclaved AMF inoculum was administered to the non-AMF plantlets at the same dosage. The potted plants were grown in a growth room with the following conditions: 25 ± 2 °C, 50–60% RH, and 100 µmol m−2 s−1 PPFD (16:8 h photoperiod under white fluorescent lamps). The plants received regular irrigation with phosphorus-free Hoagland nourishment solution. The vegetative growth of the acclimated plantlets was evaluated twelve weeks following their relocation into the growth chamber. There were thirty replications for each treatment, and each replicate was represented by a container holding a single plantlet.

2.3. Mycorrhizal Evaluations Following Host Plant Bio-Inoculation

Al-Taif rose plant roots were collected, separated, and thoroughly cleansed using distilled water. Following a 30 min treatment with 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) at 80 °C, they were rinsed again, exposed to 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for 3 min, and then acidified for 10 min with 1% HCl. They were then stained with trypan blue for 20 min at 80 °C [41]. After drying the root segments, they were put on glass slides using lactoglycerol solution. Several characteristics of the segments were examined at 400× magnification under an Olympus-BX53 optical microscope (Olympus global, Tokyo, Japan)). To evaluate intraradical colonization, at least fifty root segments from each Al-Taif rose sample were examined.

2.4. Vegetative Growth Analysis of AMF-Treated and Control Plants

Following a twelve week period of cultivation, the fresh and dry weights of the shoots (g), plant height (cm), number of leaves, and leaf area (cm2) per plantlet were used to measure the growth responses. A portable area meter (CI-202; CID, Inc., Vancouver, WA, USA) was used to calculate the leaf area. Ten Al-Taif rose plants were chosen at random, and measurements were made of each plant in triplicate. Toluidine red was used to dye the roots for eight hours, and then a flatbed scanner (Cannon unit 101; Cannon, Green Island, NY, USA) was used to scan them. WinRHIZO (version 5.0; Regent Instruments, Quebec, QC, Canada) was used to analyze the acquired pictures. Root system parameters were measured, including root surface area, root diameter, total root length, fresh and dried weight (g), and root volume.

2.5. Analysis of the Gas Exchange Characteristics of Leaves

As per the protocol of Dewir et al. [19], measurements of net CO2 assimilation, stomatal conductance, and transpiration were made at twelve weeks of acclimatization for both non-AMF and AMF-treated Al-Taif rose plants. The data was collected using a Li-Cor LI-6400 portable photosynthesis system (Li-Cor, Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) equipped with a standard 2 × 3 cm leaf cuvette and a Li-Cor LI-6400-02B light source. Inflow air with a 350 µmol CO2 concentration and 60% relative humidity was used to measure the photosynthetic parameters when the leaf temperature was 23 °C. The measurements were obtained in triplicate using ten randomly selected plants from each treatment.

2.6. Estimation of Chlorophyll Fluorescence

Using a portable chlorophyll fluorescence instrument, the Hansatech Handy PEA (Hansatech Instruments, Pentney, UK), chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics were measured on the abaxial surface of Al-Taif rose leaves. Using light with an intensity of less than 0.1 µmol m−2 s−1, the initial fluorescence (F0) was measured for 30 min in leaves that had been acclimated to darkness. The maximum fluorescence (Fm) was then measured on the same leaves after applying a saturating pulse of light (>3500 µmol m−2 s−1) for one second. Using the methodology outlined by Dewir et al. [19], the maximal variable fluorescence (Fv = Fm − F0) and the photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) were calculated for the dark-adapted leaves. A standard leaf chamber was utilized in conjunction with a random selection of three plants, specifically the fully expanded young leaves. Each treatment consisted of three separate replications, each involving one leaf.

2.7. Microscopic Observation of Stomata

Following the procedure outlined by Cotton et al. [42], strips from the cuticle of the leaves of non-AMF and AMF-treated Al-Taif rose plantlets were prepared. After soaking the leaves for twenty-four hours in distilled water, the translucent, thin layer of the leaf’s epidermal layer’s surface cells was carefully removed using pointed forceps and put on a glass slide. After that, they were stained for a few seconds using a mixture of 0.1 g triaryl methane dye and 2 mL glacial acetic acid in 100 mL distilled water (a light-green dye), and then a cover glass was placed over the epidermal strips. The glass slides were inspected under an optical microscope equipped with a SwiftCam 20 Megapixel camera for microscopes (Del-taPix, Smørum, Denmark) in order to determine the types of stomata, their sizes (measured with an ocular ruler), and their stomatal density (number of stomata per unit area). The leaf surfaces’ microscopic pictures were obtained at a magnification of 40×. The type of stomata, stomatal density, and aperture length and width were determined in the microscopic view field. A total of 30 measurements were conducted for the analysis of stomatal characteristics from randomly selected plants with different leaves (10 × 3 = 30).

2.8. Estimation of Proline Content

The measurement of free proline content followed Abraham et al. [43] guidelines. After weighing and homogenizing 0.5 g of Al-Taif rose leaves and roots in 3 mL of 3% 5-sulfosalyicilic acid and liquid nitrogen with a prechilled mortar and pestle, the samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 4000 rpm. After that, 2 mL of the supernatant was taken and incubated for 1 h at 100 °C using a ninhydrin reagent (0.125 g of ninhydrin, 3 mL of glacial acetic acid, and 2 mL of 6 M H3PO4) in order to estimate the proline concentration. After 15 min, the sample was submerged in an ice-cold bath to cease the reaction. For the extraction process, 4 mL of toluene was used, and the absorbance at 520 nm was measured. Finally, proline concentration was estimated using a standard curve.

2.9. Experimental Design and Data Analysis

With 30 replicates for each treatment, the experiments were set up in a completely randomized design. Each replicate was represented by a pot that contained one plantlet. The treatment effects were statistically evaluated using ANOVA and the unpaired t-test in SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Mycorrhizal Colonization

The AMF R. faciculaus-treated Al-Taif rose micropropagated plants displayed development vesicles, intraradical hype, intraradical spore, coiled hyphae, and arbuscular with the roots (Figure 2a–c). The mycorrhizal colonization analysis revealed 66.7% mycelium, 4.3% vesicles, and 66.7% arbuscules. It was found that 102/100 g of spores were present in the soil (Figure 3).

3.2. Growth Parameters

Twelve weeks following transplantation, the growth parameters of the AMF-treated and control plants were measured. When compared to control plants, the AMF-treated plants showed higher shoot growth values (Table 1 and Figure 4a). The AMF-treated plants had a height of 23.53 cm, which was 2.8 times greater than the height of the untreated plants. AMF-treated plants exhibited significantly greater shoot fresh weight (0.938 g/plant) and shoot dry weight (0.302 g/plant) compared to control plants (Table 1). With AMF-treated plants, there were 11.3 leaves per plant, but untreated plants had 6.4 leaves per plant. Compared to control plants (12.24 cm2), the leaf areas of AMF-treated plants were much greater (66.15 cm2). All the shoot and leaf parameters were statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05 (Table 1). It is noted that both non-AMF and AMF-treated Al-Taif rose plantlets showed high levels of survival 98% and 100%, respectively, following ex vitro acclimatization.
Figure 5 displays the results on growth parameters related to the root system. When comparing AMF-treated plants to control plants, the root growth was more robust (Figure 4b). With the AMF-treated plants, the length of the main root, total root length, number of root tips, total root area, total root volume, root fresh weight, and dry weight were, in order, 15.05 cm/plant, 172.16 cm/plant, 278/plant, 64.36 cm2/plant, 1.66 cm3/plant, 382 mg/plant, and 80.00 mg/plant (Figure 5). At p ≤ 0.05 level, each of these root growth values was statistically significant. Conversely, when compared to the control (1.04 mm/plantlet), the root diameter was at its maximum in non-AMF plants (1.16 mm/plantlet) but this parameter was not statistically significant. These findings unequivocally show that AMF-treated plants exhibited considerably higher vegetative development, as measured by shoot, leaf, and root growth indices, in comparison to the untreated plants.

3.3. Stomatal Frequency, Stomatal Conductance, Leaf Gas Exchange, and Transpiration Rate

Figure 6 and Figure 7 show the results of the assessment of the physiological status of both AMF-treated and untreated plants with respect to transpiration rate, stomatal frequency, stomatal conductance, net carbon dioxide assimilation, and the maximum potential quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm). As shown in Figure 6a–c, the stomatal density of AMF plants was 7.50 mm2, while that of control plants was 12.33 mm2. Plants treated with AMF had a greater stomatal aperture height of 15.33 µm compared to control plants’ height of 10.00 µm. Nonetheless, both the control (7.33 µm) and AMF-treated (8.00 µm) plants had equal stomatal aperture widths. The recorded net CO2 assimilation values were 3.21 µmol CO2 m−2·s−1 and 1.43 CO2 m−2·s−1 for AMF treated and control plants, respectively (Figure 7a). The stomatal conductance in AMF and control plants was 0.021 mol H2O mm−2·s−1 and 0.013 mol H2O m−2·s−1, respectively (Figure 7b). The transpiration rate of the AMF-treated plants was also higher (1.40 mol H2O m−2·s−1) compared with that of the control plants (0.82 mol H2O m−2·s−1) (Figure 7c). When comparing the AMF-treated plants to the untreated plants, the Fv/Fm values were significantly higher (0.77) (Figure 7d). Furthermore, we calculated the proline content in the roots and leaves of the plants treated with AMF and the control plants. When compared to the proline concentration in the AMF-treated leaves and roots, the untreated leaves and roots had proline contents of 3.63 µg/g leaf fresh weight and 3.83 µg/g root fresh weight, respectively. These values were statistically significant (Figure 7e,f).

4. Discussion

Micropropagated plants present challenges with regard to plantlet growth, development, and survival throughout the acclimatization phase. Micropropagated plantlets suffer stress upon their transfer to ex vitro conditions, resulting in low survival rate. Soil infections often affect plants with stunted development, which prevents them from recovery [44,45,46]. Most floriculture and horticulture plant species are now propagated in vitro; unfortunately, 10–40% of these plants die when transplanted ex vitro, causing significant losses for the industry [47]. Mycorrhizal fungi are known to have the ability to increase agricultural productivity as biofertilizers and bioprotectors. This interaction may allow the plants to absorb more of the available nutrients in the soil, which would be advantageous for their growth. Mycorrhizal symbioses are therefore a desirable system in horticulture and floriculture [47]. AMF reduces disease invasion, increases drought stress tolerance, improves host plant uptake of minerals and nutrients, and promotes photosynthesis [48]. AMF beneficially affects host plant development, polyamine synthesis, osmotic adjustment, water transport, and drought tolerance [49]. Consequently, one of the biological techniques for acclimatization and establishment of micropropagated plants has been the use of AMF. We used AMF Rhizophagus faciculaus in the present study to transplant micropropagated Al-Taif rose plants, and we investigated the effects of AMF on the plants’ growth, development, and physiological traits following a 12 week transplanting period.
After 12 weeks of cultivation, the roots of AMF treated plants were harvested and examined for colonization with Al-Taif rose plants. The microscopic observation showed the development of vesicles, intraradical hype, intraradical spore, coiled hyphae, and arbuscular with the roots. In the mycorrhizal colonization analysis, 66.7% mycelium, 4.3% vesicles, and 66.7% arbuscules were found. These results are in concurrence with Etilingera elatior in vitro regenerated plants which showed very good colonization of AMF Gigospora albida and Claroideogloums etunicatum after treatment with these fungi [12]. Whereas, micropropagated plants of Philodendron bipinnatifidum demonstrated 66.66% mycelium, 11.11% vesicles, and 51.11% arbuscules with treatment of AMF Gigospora albida and G. marginata [17]. Numerous studies have shown that fertilizing AMF with in vitro regenerated plants following ex vitro transplantation promotes the plants’ development and growth as well as their ability to produce more biomass. In the current study, Rhizophagus faciculaus-treated Al-Taif rose micropropagated plants showed improved growth in terms of plant height, number, and area of leaves, as well as considerably greater fresh and dry weight of the shoots. In line with the present findings, studies on gerbera and heliconea [50], flame lilies [13], bananas [16], peonies [51], tree philodendron [17], and blackberries [19] have shown increases in plant height, leaf number and area, and shoot biomass.
Fortifying micropropagated plants with AMF enhances the rooting intensity and surface area of existing roots, which helps to develop a superior and stronger root system, according to Kapoor et al. [8] and Puthur et al. [52]. When AMF colonizes plant roots, it can alter the morphology of a root system in a structural, distinct, quantitative, and temporal way [53]. The adventitious roots of AMF colonization are highly branching, have larger diameters, and shorter specific root lengths, according to Berta et al. [54]. Rhizophagus faciculaus treatment resulted in a greater total length, number of roots, total root area, total root volume, fresh weight, and dry weight for the AMF treated Al-Taif rose micropropagated plants in this study. In a similar vein, treatment with AMF Glomus mosseae and Acaulospora laevis resulted in noticeably longer and stronger roots for flame lily micropropagated plants [13]. Wu et al. [9] have demonstrated the beneficial impact of AMF Glomus mossease on the growth and accumulation of dry biomass in Citrus tangerine in a different study. It has been found that in vitro regenerated plants have increased transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and decreased net-CO2 assimilation. Nevertheless, after a few weeks of transplantation, plants receiving AMF treatments have demonstrated the restoration of these physiological processes [55]. When compared to untreated plants, Al-Taif rose plants treated with AMF showed significantly reduced stomatal density (7.5 mm2), higher stomatal conductance (0.021 mol H2O m−2·s−1), and higher transpiration rate (1.40 mol H2O m−2·s−1) (Figure 6 and Figure 7). These findings show that the plants treated with AMF experienced physiological changes, including a decrease in the number of stomata per unit area and appropriate stomatal conductance and respiration. In line with the findings above, apple in vitro regenerated plants treated with Gigaspora albida, Acaulospora morrowiae, Acaulospora colombiana, and Claroideoglomus etunicatum demonstrated improved stomatal apparatus functioning in comparison to untreated plants [15].
The ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence, or Fv/Fm, is used to compute chlorophyll fluorescence, a metric of photosynthetic efficiency. When micropropagated plants are acclimating, the PSII’s principal photochemistry, which is highly susceptible to a range of environmental stressors, is measured by the Fv/Fm ratio. For instance, stress from light or salt may damage the PSII reaction center and interfere with electron transport in the plants’ photosynthetic machinery. A decrease in this parameter indicates down regulation of photosynthesis or photoinhibition [56]. Previous studies reported that mycorrhizal symbiosis could reduce the harmful effects of salinity on the PSII response center [57]. Compared to non-mycorrhizal plants, the mycorrhizal plants had a substantially higher Fv/Fm ratio [57,58]. Additionally, compared to uninoculated plants, the mycorrhiza-inoculated plants exhibited greater non-photochemical quenching [57] Processes that shield the leaf from light-induced damage may lead to an increase in non-photochemical quenching [59]. According to the current findings, Al-Taif rose plants treated with AMF exhibited greater Fv/Fm values, indicating improved plant acclimation following transplantation. Several studies have demonstrated that plants treated with AMF have greater net CO2 assimilatio and higher rates of photosynthesis [8]. When compared to untreated plants, the AMF treated Al-Taif rose micropropagated plants in this study showed better net CO2 assimilation 3.21 µmol CO2 m−2·s−1 and a higher chlorophyll florescence ratio of 0.77. Additionally, Gomez-Falcon et al. [10] have demonstrated that Cocus nucifera plantlets treated with Rhizoglomus intraradices and Acaulospora colombiana exhibited greater levels of CO2 assimilation and optimal chlorophyll fluorescence. Numerous studies have indicated that adding AMF to micropropagated plants can help them resist a variety of biotic and abiotic challenges [60,61]. One of a plant’s primary responses to stress is the buildup of osmotic adjustment compounds like proline. Proline buildup was found to be less in plants infected with AM fungus than in control plants, such as roses [62,63]. Plants treated with AMF therefore accumulate less proline than control plants. The proline content of the AMF-treated and untreated plants was estimated in this study. The results showed that the proline content of the AMF-treated plants was significantly lower in the leaves (2.44 µg/g leaf fresh weight compared to 3.63 µg/g leaf fresh weight) and roots (2.03 µg/g root fresh weight tissue compared to 3.83 µg/g root fresh weight). These findings imply that AMF colonization increased the host plant’s tolerance to the ex vitro adverse environments.

5. Conclusions

AMF R. faciculaus affected growth, biomass accumulation in the shoots and roots, and physiological responses of micropropagated Al-Taif rose plants during the acclimatization stage. When compared to untreated plants, plants treated with AMF established well and witnessed vigorous growth. When AMF had been administered into the plants, the following parameters showed optimal growth: root length, total root volume, number of rootlets, fresh and dry biomass of roots, fresh and dry biomass of shoots, leaf number, and leaf area. The AMF-treated plants also showed increased transpiration rate and stomatal conductance, along with a reduced number of stomata. Likewise, AMF-treated plants exhibited low proline content and considerably increased net CO2 assimilation and Fv/Fm values. These findings demonstrate the usefulness of AMF inoculation with in vitro regenerated plants during acclimatization.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.H.D.; methodology, A.M.A.-A., M.M.H., T.S.A., J.A.M. and A.A.A.-Q.; software, Y.H.D. and T.S.A.; validation, R.S.A.-O. and H.N.M.; formal analysis Y.H.D., A.M.A.-A., M.M.H., T.S.A. and J.A.M.; investigation, Y.H.D., A.M.A.-A., M.M.H., J.A.M., T.S.A. and A.A.A.-Q.; resources, Y.H.D. and A.A.A.-Q.; data curation, Y.H.D., A.M.A.-A., R.S.A.-O. and T.S.A.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.H.D., A.M.A.-A., M.M.H. and H.N.M.; writing—review and editing, Y.H.D., R.S.A.-O., A.A.A.-Q. and H.N.M.; visualization, A.A.A.-Q. and H.N.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2024R375), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mona Alwahibi, King Saud University for her help with the microscopic observations. The authors acknowledge Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2024R375), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with a minor correction to resolve spelling and grammatical errors. This change does not affect the scientific content of the article.

References

  1. Rout, G.R.; Mohapatra, A.; Jain, S.M. Tissue culture of ornamental pot plant: A critical review on present scenario and future prospects. Biotechnol. Adv. 2006, 24, 531–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yassemin, S.; Beruto, M. A review on flower bulb micropropagation: Challenges and opportunities. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Murthy, H.N.; Jospeh, K.S.; Paek, K.Y.; Park, S.Y. Bioreactor systems for micropropagation of plants: Present scenario and future prospects. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1159588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hwang, H.D.; Kwon, S.H.; Murthy, H.N.; Yan, S.W.; Pyo, S.S.; Park, S.Y. Temporary immersion bioreactor system as an efficient method for mass production of in vitro plants in horticulture and medicinal plants. Agronomy 2022, 12, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Abdalla, N.; El-Ramady, H.; Seliem, M.K.; El-Mahrouk, M.E.; Taha, N.; Bayoumi, Y.; Shalaby, T.A.; Dobranszki, J. An academic and technical overview on plant micropropagation challenges. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pospisilova, J.; Ticha, I.; Kadlecek, S.; Haisel, D.; Pizakova, S. Acclimatization of micropropagated plants in ex vitro conditions. Biol. Plant. 1999, 42, 481–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Smith, F.A.; Smith, F.E. Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant nutrition and growth: New paradigms from cellular to ecosystem scales. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2011, 62, 227–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kapoor, R.; Sharma, D.; Bhatnagar, A.K. Arbuscular mycorrhizae in micropropagation systems and their potential applications. Sci. Hortic. 2008, 116, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, Q.S.; Zou, Y.N.; Wang, G.Y. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and acclimatization of micropropagated citrus. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2011, 42, 1825–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gomez-Falcon, N.; Saenz-Carbonell, L.A.; Andrade-Torres, A.; Lara-Perez, L.A.; Narvez, M.; Oropeza, C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increases the survival and growth of micropropagated coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) plantlets. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2023, 59, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Baltazar-Bernal, O.; Spinoso-Castillo, J.L.; Mancilla-Alvarez, E.; Bello-Bello, J.J. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi induce tolerance to salinity stress in taro plantlets (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) during acclimatization. Plants 2022, 11, 1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. da Silva, A.R.; de Melo, N.F.; Yano-Melo, A.M. Acclimatization of micropropagated plants Etlingera elatior (Jack) R.M. Sm. Inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 113, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yadav, K.; Aggarwal, A.; Singh, N. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) induced acclimatization, growth, enhancement and colchicine content of micropropagated Gloriosa superba L. plantlets. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 45, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dewir, Y.H.; Habib, M.M.; Alaizari, A.A.; Malik, J.A.; Al-Ali, A.M.; Al-Qarawi, A.A.; Alwahibi, M.S. Promising application of automated liquid culture system and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for large-scale micropropagation of red dragon fruit. Plants 2023, 12, 1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Costa, M.D.; Rech, T.D.; Primieri, S.; Pigozzi, B.G.; Werner, S.S.; Sturmer, S.L. Inoculation with isolated of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influences growth, nutrient use efficiency and gas exchange traits in micropropagated apple rootstock ‘Marubakaido’. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2021, 145, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Koffi, M.C.; Declerck, S. In vitro mycorrhization of banana (Musa acuminata) plantlets improves their growth during acclimatization. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2015, 51, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dewir, Y.H.; Habib, M.M.; AlQarawi, A.A.; Alshahrani, T.S.; Alaizari, A.A.; Malik, J.A.; Alwahibi, M.S.; Murthy, H.N. Mycorrhization enhances vegetative growth, leaf gas exchange, and root development of micropropagated Philodendron bipinnatifidum Schott ex Endl. plantlets during acclimatization. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Geneva, M.; Hristozkova, M.; Kirova, E.; Sichanova, M.; Stanceva, I. Response to drought stress of in vitro and in vivo propagated Physalis peruviana L. plants inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Agriculture 2023, 13, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dewir, Y.H.; Al-Qarawi, A.A.; Alshahrani, T.; Bansal, Y.; Mujib, A.; Murthy, H.N.; Alebidi, A.I.; Almutairi, K.F.; Al-saif, A.M. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth and development of micropropagated Rubus fruticosus ‘P45’ plants during acclimatization. HortScience 2023, 58, 871–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mirjani, L.; Salimi, A.; Matinizadeh, M.; Razavi, K.; Shahbazi, M. The role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on acclimatization of micropropagated plantlet Satureja khuzistanica Jam. by ameliorating the antioxidant activity and expression of PAL gene. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 253, 364–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bahaffi, S.O. Volatile oil composition of Taif rose. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2005, 9, 401–406. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kürkçüoglu, M.; Abdel-Megeed, A.; Başer, K. The composition of Taif rose oil. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2013, 25, 364–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, H. Beneficial medicinal effects and material applications of rose. Heliyon 2024, 10, e23530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bazaid, S.A. Protein and DNA fragments variation in relation to low temperature in four Rosa hybirida cultivars in Taif, Saudi Arabia. J. Egypt. Acad. Dev. 2004, 5, 77–90. [Google Scholar]
  25. Venkatesha, K.T.; Gupta, A.; Rai, A.N.; Jambhulkar, S.J.; Bisht, R.; Padalia, R.C. Recent developments, challenges, and opportunities in genetic improvement of essential oil-bearing rose (Rosa damascena): A review. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2022, 184, 114984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kumar, A.; Gautam, R.D.; Singh, S.; Chauhan, R.; Kumar, M.; Kumar, D.; Kumar, A.; Singh, S. Phenotypic floral traits and essential oil profiling revealed considerable variations in clonal selections of damask rose (Rosa damascena Mill.). Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 8101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Podwyszyńska, M.; Orlikowska, T.; Trojak-Goluch, A.; Wojtania, A. Application and improvement of in vitro culture systems for commercial production of ornamental, fruit, and industrial plants in Poland. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2022, 91, 914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Al-Ali, A.M.; Dewir, Y.H.; Al-Obeed, R.S. Influence of cytokinins, dark incubation and air-lift bioreactor culture on axillary shoot proliferation of Al-Taif Rose (Rosa damascena trigintipetala (Dieck) R. Keller). Horticulturae 2023, 9, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Al-Ali, A.M.; Dewir, Y.H.; Al-Obeed, R.S. Micropropagation of Al-Taif Rose: Effects of medium constituents and light on in vitro rooting and acclimatization. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schüssler, A.; Walker, C. The Glomeromycota: A Species List with New Families and New Gener. In The Glomeromycota; CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform: Scotts Valley, CA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  31. Luxmi, S.; Singh, R.; Ahmed, S.; Gandhi, S.G.; Bhanwaria, R. Glomus fasciculatum an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus alleviates the adverse effects of lead, arsenic, nickel, and improves growth parameters of Monarda citriodora Cerv. ex Lag (lemon beebalm). Rhizosphere 2023, 27, 100753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Djighaly, P.I.; Diagne, N.; Ngom, M.; Ngom, D.; Hocher, V.; Fall, D.; Diouf, D.; Laplaze, L.; Svistoonoff, S.; Champion, A. Selection of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal strains to improve Casuarina equisetifolia L. and Casuarina glauca Sieb. tolerance to salinity. Ann. For. Sci. 2018, 75, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Solanki, M.K.; Kashyap, P.L.; Kumari, B.; Ansari, R.A.; Sumbul, A.; Rizvi, R.; Mahmood, I. Mycorrhizal fungi and its importance in plant health amelioration. In Microbiomes and Plant Health; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 205–223. [Google Scholar]
  34. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gerdemann, J.; Nicolson, T.H. Spores of mycorrhizal Endogone species extracted from soil by wet sieving and decanting. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1963, 46, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Walker, C. Spore Extraction by Centrifugation-Sugar Flotation; Biological Research and Imaging Laboratory: Hampshire, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  37. Schenck, N.C.; Perez, Y. Manual for Identification of VA Mycorrhizal Fungi; Synergistic Publication: Gainesville, FL, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  38. International Culture of Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (INAVAM). Available online: http://invam.caf.wvu.edu (accessed on 1 July 2023).
  39. Redecker, D.; Schüßler, A.; Stockinger, H.; Stürmer, S.L.; Morton, J.B.; Walker, C. An evidence-based consensus for the classification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota). Mycorrhiza 2013, 23, 515–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Schüßler, A.; Schwarzott, D.; Walker, C. A new fungal phylum, the Glomeromycota: Phylogeny and evolution. Mycol. Res. 2001, 105, 1413–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Phillips, J.M.; Hayman, D. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Tans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1970, 55, 158–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cotton, R. Cytotaxonomy of the Genus Vulpia; The University of Manchester: Manchester, UK, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  43. Abraham, A.; Hourton-Cabassa, C.; Erdei, L.; Szabados, L. Methods for determination of proline in plants. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 639, 317–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chandra, S.; Bandopadhyay, R.; Kumar, V.; Chandra, R. Acclimatization of tissue cultured plantlets: From laboratory to land. Biotechnol. Lett. 2010, 32, 1199–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hazarika, B.N. Acclimatizaiton of tissue-cultured plants. Curr. Sci. 2003, 85, 1704–1712. [Google Scholar]
  46. Preece, J.E.; Sutter, E.G. Acclimatization of micropropagated plants to the greenhouse and field. In Micropropagation; Debergh, P.C., Zimmerman, R.H., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Koltai, H. Mycorrhiza in floriculture: Difficulties and opportunities. Symbiosis 2010, 52, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Choi, J.; Summers, W.; Paszkowski, U. Mechanism underlaying establishment of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2018, 56, 135–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Abdalla, M.; Ahmaed, M.A. Arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis enhances water status and soil hydraulic conductance under drought. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 722954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sato, A.Y.; Nannetti, D.D.C.; Pinto, J.E.B.P.; Siqueira, J.O.; Blank, M.D.F.A. Application of arbuscular mycorrhiza to micropropagated Heliconia and Gerbera plants during acclimatization period. Hortic. Bras. 1999, 17, 25–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wen, S.S.; Cheng, F.Y.; Zhong, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, L.Z.; Zhang, Y.X.; Qiu, J.M. Efficient protocols for the micropropagation of tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa “Jin Pao Hong”, P. suffruticosa “Wu Long Peng Sheng”, and P. x lemoninei “High Noon”) and application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to improve plantlet establishment. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 201, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Puthur, J.T.; Prasad, K.V.S.K.; Sharmila, P.; Pardha Saradhi, P. Vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improves establishment of micropropagated Leucaena leucocephala plantlets. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1998, 53, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Norman, J.R.; Atkinson, D.; Hooker, J.E. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal-induced alteration to root architecture in strawberry and induced resistance to the root pathogen Phytophthora fragariae. Plant Soil 1996, 185, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Berta, G.; Fusconi, A.; Trotta, A. VA mycorrhizal infections and the morphology and function of root systems. Environ. Exp. Bot. 1993, 33, 159–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Estrada-Luna, A.; Davies, F.T., Jr. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence water relations, gas exchange, abscisic acid, and growth of micropropgated chile ancho pepper (Capsicum annuum) plantlets during acclimatization and post-acclimatization. J. Plant Physiol. 2003, 160, 1073–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Dewir, Y.H.; Chakrabarty, D.; Ali, M.B.; Hahn, E.J.; Paek, K.Y. Effects of hydroponic solution EC, substrates, PPF and nutrient scheduling on growth and photosynthetic competence during acclimatization of micropropagated Spathiphyllum plantlets. Plant Growth Regul. 2005, 46, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sheng, M.; Tang, M.; Chan, H.; Yang, B.; Zhang, F.; Huang, Y. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on photosynthesis and water status of maize plants under salt stress. Mycorrhiza 2008, 18, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zuccarini, P.; Okurowska, P. Effects of mycorrhizal colonization and fertilization on growth and photosynthesis of sweet basil under salt stress. J. Plant Nutr. 2008, 31, 497–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Maxwell, K.; Johnson, G.N. Chlorophyll fluorescence—A practical guide. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Dowarah, B.; Gill, S.S.; Agarwala, N. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in conferring tolerance to biotic stresses in plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 42, 1429–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Begum, N.; Qin, C.; Ahanger, M.A.; Raza, S.; Khan, M.I.; Ashraf, M.; Ahmed, N.; Zhang, L. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant growth regulation: Implications in abiotic stress tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Manoharan, P.T.; Shanmugaiah, V.; Balasubramanian, N.; Gomathinayagam, S.; Sharma, M.P.; Muthuchelian, K. Influence of AM fungi on the growth and physiological status of Erythrina variegata Linn. grown under different water stress conditions. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2010, 46, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Abdel-Salam, E.; Alatar, A.; El-Sheikh, M.A. Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviates harmful effects of drought stress on damask rose. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 25, 1772–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Photograph showing Al-Taif rose plant material used for the AMF experiments. (a) shoots regenerated in vitro on MS medium containing 0.5 mg/L of BAP + 30 g/L sucrose; (b,c) in vitro rooting on MS medium containing 80 g/L sucrose, 0.5 g/L activated charcoal, and 0.2 mg/L NAA; (d) micropropagated plantlets with plastic cover during the acclimatization using AMF.
Figure 1. Photograph showing Al-Taif rose plant material used for the AMF experiments. (a) shoots regenerated in vitro on MS medium containing 0.5 mg/L of BAP + 30 g/L sucrose; (b,c) in vitro rooting on MS medium containing 80 g/L sucrose, 0.5 g/L activated charcoal, and 0.2 mg/L NAA; (d) micropropagated plantlets with plastic cover during the acclimatization using AMF.
Horticulturae 10 01120 g001
Figure 2. Photomicrographs (400× magnification) showing blue stained Al-Taif rose roots inoculated with R. fasciculatus (ac). The typical AMF colonization structures were observed as vesicles (V), intraradical hyphae (IH), intraradical spore (IS), coiled hyphae (CH), and arbuscules (Ar).
Figure 2. Photomicrographs (400× magnification) showing blue stained Al-Taif rose roots inoculated with R. fasciculatus (ac). The typical AMF colonization structures were observed as vesicles (V), intraradical hyphae (IH), intraradical spore (IS), coiled hyphae (CH), and arbuscules (Ar).
Horticulturae 10 01120 g002
Figure 3. Spore and mycelial count in the roots of Al-Taif rose colonized by R. fasciculatus after 12 weeks acclimatization.
Figure 3. Spore and mycelial count in the roots of Al-Taif rose colonized by R. fasciculatus after 12 weeks acclimatization.
Horticulturae 10 01120 g003
Figure 4. Photograph showing vegetative growth (a) and root growth (b) in non-AMF and AMF-treated Al-Taif rose plantlets after 12 weeks acclimatization.
Figure 4. Photograph showing vegetative growth (a) and root growth (b) in non-AMF and AMF-treated Al-Taif rose plantlets after 12 weeks acclimatization.
Horticulturae 10 01120 g004
Figure 5. Root growth characteristics in non-AMF and AMF-treated Al-Taif rose plants after 12 weeks acclimatization. (a) length of the main root, (b) total root length, (c) number of root tips, (d) root diameter, (e) total root surface area, (f) total root volume, (g) root fresh weight, and (h) root dry weight. NS and * = non-significant and significant at p ≤ 0.05, respectively, according to Student’s unpaired t-test.
Figure 5. Root growth characteristics in non-AMF and AMF-treated Al-Taif rose plants after 12 weeks acclimatization. (a) length of the main root, (b) total root length, (c) number of root tips, (d) root diameter, (e) total root surface area, (f) total root volume, (g) root fresh weight, and (h) root dry weight. NS and * = non-significant and significant at p ≤ 0.05, respectively, according to Student’s unpaired t-test.
Horticulturae 10 01120 g005
Figure 6. Microscopic images of stomata (Arrow; 40× magnification) in non-AMF (a) and AMF-treated (b) Al-Taif rose plantlets and stomatal density, aperture length and width (c) after 12 weeks acclimatization. NS and * = non-significant and significant at p ≤ 0.05, respectively, according to Student’s unpaired t-test.
Figure 6. Microscopic images of stomata (Arrow; 40× magnification) in non-AMF (a) and AMF-treated (b) Al-Taif rose plantlets and stomatal density, aperture length and width (c) after 12 weeks acclimatization. NS and * = non-significant and significant at p ≤ 0.05, respectively, according to Student’s unpaired t-test.
Horticulturae 10 01120 g006
Figure 7. Net photosynthetic rate (a), stomatal conductance (b), transpiration rate (c), Fv/Fm (d), and proline content in leaf (e) and root (f) of non-AMF and AMF-treated Al-Taif rose plants after 12 weeks acclimatization. * = significant at p ≤ 0.05 according to Student’s unpaired t-test.
Figure 7. Net photosynthetic rate (a), stomatal conductance (b), transpiration rate (c), Fv/Fm (d), and proline content in leaf (e) and root (f) of non-AMF and AMF-treated Al-Taif rose plants after 12 weeks acclimatization. * = significant at p ≤ 0.05 according to Student’s unpaired t-test.
Horticulturae 10 01120 g007
Table 1. Vegetative growth characteristics in non-AMF and AMF-treated Al-Taif rose plantlets after 12 weeks acclimatization.
Table 1. Vegetative growth characteristics in non-AMF and AMF-treated Al-Taif rose plantlets after 12 weeks acclimatization.
Growth ParametersNon-AMFAMF-Treated
Plant height (cm)8.51 ± 0.35623.53 ± 0.697 *
Shoot fresh weight/plant (g)0.240 ± 0.0160.938 ± 0.036 *
Shoot dry weight/plant (g)0.089 ± 0.0050.302 ± 0.009 *
Number of leaves/plants6.4 ± 0.45211.3 ± 0.731 *
Leaf area/plant (cm2)12.24 ± 0.93866.15 ± 3.014 *
* = significant at p ≤ 0.05 according to Student’s unpaired t-test.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dewir, Y.H.; Al-Ali, A.M.; Al-Obeed, R.S.; Habib, M.M.; Malik, J.A.; Alshahrani, T.S.; Al-Qarawi, A.A.; Murthy, H.N. Biological Acclimatization of Micropropagated Al-Taif Rose (Rosa damascena f. trigintipetala (Dieck) R. Keller) Plants Using Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Rhizophagus fasciculatus. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101120

AMA Style

Dewir YH, Al-Ali AM, Al-Obeed RS, Habib MM, Malik JA, Alshahrani TS, Al-Qarawi AA, Murthy HN. Biological Acclimatization of Micropropagated Al-Taif Rose (Rosa damascena f. trigintipetala (Dieck) R. Keller) Plants Using Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Rhizophagus fasciculatus. Horticulturae. 2024; 10(10):1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101120

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dewir, Yaser Hassan, Ali Mohsen Al-Ali, Rashid Sultan Al-Obeed, Muhammad M. Habib, Jahangir A. Malik, Thobayet S. Alshahrani, Abdulaziz A. Al-Qarawi, and Hosakatte Niranjana Murthy. 2024. "Biological Acclimatization of Micropropagated Al-Taif Rose (Rosa damascena f. trigintipetala (Dieck) R. Keller) Plants Using Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Rhizophagus fasciculatus" Horticulturae 10, no. 10: 1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101120

APA Style

Dewir, Y. H., Al-Ali, A. M., Al-Obeed, R. S., Habib, M. M., Malik, J. A., Alshahrani, T. S., Al-Qarawi, A. A., & Murthy, H. N. (2024). Biological Acclimatization of Micropropagated Al-Taif Rose (Rosa damascena f. trigintipetala (Dieck) R. Keller) Plants Using Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Rhizophagus fasciculatus. Horticulturae, 10(10), 1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101120

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop