Next Article in Journal
Reducing Splitting of ‘Murcott’ Tangor Fruit (Citrus reticulate × Citrus sinensis) through Foliar Application of Forchlorfenuron (CPPU)
Previous Article in Journal
From Weeds to Feeds: Exploring the Potential of Wild Plants in Horticulture from a Centuries-Long Journey to an AI-Driven Future
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Lithium: An Element with Potential for Biostimulation and Biofortification Approaches in Plants

by
María de la Luz Buendía-Valverde
1,
Fernando Carlos Gómez-Merino
2,3,
Yolanda Leticia Fernández-Pavía
1,
Rodrigo Aníbal Mateos-Nava
4 and
Libia Iris Trejo-Téllez
1,2,*
1
Laboratory of Plant Nutrition, Department of Soil Science, College of Postgraduates in Agricultural Sciences Montecillo Campus, Montecillo, Texcoco 56264, Mexico
2
Department of Genetic Resources and Productivity-Plant Physiology, College of Postgraduates in Agricultural Sciences Montecillo Campus, Montecillo, Texcoco 56264, Mexico
3
Laboratory of Plant Tissue Culture, Department of Sustainable Agri-Food Innovation, Collaborative Research Group, College of Postgraduates in Agricultural Sciences Córdoba Campus, Manuel León, Amatlán de los Reyes 94953, Mexico
4
Multidisciplinary Experimental Research Unit (UMIE-ZAP 9-020), L5 PA Laboratory, Research Unit in Genetics and Environmental Toxicology (UIGTA), Faculty of Higher Studies-Zaragoza II Campus, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City 15000, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2024, 10(10), 1022; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101022
Submission received: 14 August 2024 / Revised: 19 September 2024 / Accepted: 23 September 2024 / Published: 26 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Nutrition)

Abstract

:
Lithium (Li) is the lightest metal in existence. Its effects on higher plants are still under discussion because both positive and toxic results have been reported in different species. In the last decade, the use of Li has increased considerably, and it is projected that Li waste will be an environmental problem in the near future, such that various organisms, including plants, may be altered by its presence. Interestingly, Li can trigger hormesis, with beneficial effects at low doses and inhibitory or harmful effects at high doses. Currently, numerous research groups are focusing their studies on agriculture to obtain crops fortified with Li, which represents a nutritional advantage in food if adequate concentrations are used. However, more studies are still needed in order to understand the biochemical mechanisms of the effects of Li on plants. This review describes the natural and anthropogenic sources of Li, as well as the concentrations of this element in different environments. Regarding the uses of Li in different areas, topics related to doses that cause toxicity and lethality in humans are addressed. Given its impact on crop production, mechanisms of Li uptake and transport in higher plants are reviewed, as well as the effects on plant metabolism and physiology. Likewise, the perspective on the controlled use of Li in biostimulation and biofortification of crops is addressed.

1. Introduction

Lithium (Li) is the lightest alkali metal, with an atomic mass of 6.941 g mol−1, a density of 0.53 g cm−3 at 20 °C (half that of water), and the highest negative electrochemical potential among metals; it has a melting point of 180.54 °C, a boiling point of 1342 °C, an oxidation state of +1, and an atomic number of 3 [1,2,3]. It is silvery-white, with an atomic radius of 0.157 Å, an ionic radius of 0.60 Å, and an ionic potential of 1.47 Å [4]. Its name comes from the Greek word ‘lithos’ that means stone. It received this name because it is present in all rocks. It was discovered by the Swedish chemist Johan August Arfewdson in 1817 [5,6]. Its effects on higher plants are controversial because it exerts toxic effects when applied at high doses, whereas it stimulates growth at low concentrations [2,7].
In humans, Li is not bioaccumulative, as it is eliminated 24 h after ingestion [8], and its compounds generally have low toxicity (Table 1), most of them being highly water-soluble [9].
In recent decades, the economic importance of Li has increased, with the supply reaching up to 500,000 Mg per year worldwide. Currently, there are no specific data on its release into the environment, but it can occur either in electronic waste or in pharmaceutical waste; both increase in concentration day by day, since there is still no economically efficient recycling of Li [11].
Li is present in various organisms, and although it is not an essential element in higher plants, it can have beneficial effects when applied in small quantities. In contrast, high levels of Li can damage the growth of roots and shoots, as well as alter photosynthetic activity and nutrient absorption [2,12]. Since its effects are controversial, there is a serious need to study the toxic levels and tolerance mechanisms that Li can cause in order to foster its proper use in plant species either in biostimulation or agronomic biofortification approached [7,12].
Lithium has low toxicity and does not accumulate in humans, since it is eliminated 24 h after ingestion. This represents a great advantage in future agronomic biofortification studies and for the pharmaceutical industry, where it is already used in the treatment of psychiatric disorders [8,9].

2. Abundance and Concentrations in the Environment

In the Earth’s crust, Li is ranked 27th in abundance [9,13]. It is not found as a free element, but rather in variable quantities in minerals such as silicates [spodumene (LiAlSi2O6), petalite (LiAl(Si4O10)), and eucryptite (LiAlSiO4)]; micas [lepidolite (K(Li,Al)3(Si,Al)4O10(F,OH)2) and zinnwaldite (KLiFe2+Al(AlSi3)O10(OH,F)2)]; and phosphates [amblygonite (LiAlFPO4)]. In addition, it is present in surface water, groundwater, and seawater [4,14,15].
The total world production of Li in 2020 was 82,000 Mg [16]. The global reserve of Li is estimated to be equivalent to 29.8 million Mg [17]. The main producers are Chile, Argentina, China, Bolivia, Australia, the United States, and Russia [4,6,18].
Lithium is naturally found in water and soil; its concentrations on the planet are varied and depend on the nature of the rocks and minerals present. However, anthropogenic sources such as smelting and mining release significant amounts of Li into the environment [19]. The average concentration in surface water ranges from 1 to 10 µg L−1, in seawater it is 0.18 mg L−1, and in groundwater it is 0.5 mg L−1 [17], although higher concentrations have been reported in some specific regions. For example, in Texas (USA), 170 mg Li L−1 is reached, while in rivers in Chile the reported amounts range from 1508 to 5170 mg Li L−1. In drinking water there is no standard level of Li that determines its quality for human consumption [7].
In Australia, Li is considered an environmental contaminant present in irrigation water and treated wastewater, which can be a source of toxicity for agricultural production; therefore, its levels should not exceed 2.5 mg L−1 [20,21].
Lithium is present in all soils, and its concentration varies according to the type and mineral composition. Its average content in igneous rocks ranges from 40 to 45 mg kg−1, while in sedimentary rocks its concentration is between 60 and 75 mg kg−1 [8]. In addition, Li is found mainly in the clay fraction and to a lesser extent in the organic fraction of soil, between 7 and 200 µg g−1, respectively [17]. Due to mineral degradation, Li ions are leached into the soil through rainfall, reaching water supplies [5], and because Li salts are water-soluble, the element can be easily absorbed by plants [20].

3. Uses of and Demand for Li

In industry, Li is used to produce alloys, lubricating greases, air conditioning systems, and electrical appliances [5,17]. In the last decade, new applications have been found, mainly in the manufacture of high-performance rechargeable batteries, portable electrical appliances, and high-strength light alloys for aircraft parts; as a carbon dioxide absorbent in spacecraft; in high-energy additives for rocket propellants; as a fusion fuel in hydrogen bombs; and as an energy storage device in electric and hybrid vehicles [6,17].
Lithium is not an essential element for plants and animals; however, Li carbonate, acetate, and citrate are used as medicine in the treatment of patients with psychiatric disorders [6,8,22]. According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), the daily intake of Li in a 70 kg adult ranges from 650 to 3100 µg, acquired mainly through dietary sources consisting of grains and vegetables (430 to 2990 µg), dairy products (222 µg), and meat (2.5 µg) [7].
Given its high demand in modern technology, Li is considered “the white gold” [16]. Since 2010, the demand for Li has tripled (100,000 Mg year−1) due to the mass production of rechargeable Li-ion batteries; forecasts suggest that it will peak in 2041 and slowly decline as the resource is depleted at the end of this century [23].
The consumption projection for the coming decades and the low recycling rate imply an increase in waste containing Li, mainly batteries, which will reach open landfills, aquatic environments, and agricultural fields, where they can have an impact on living beings and ecosystems. Knowing the effects that Li compounds produce in plant metabolism is essential to understand their impact on the growth, yield, and quality of crop plants [16,23].

4. Lithium Absorption, Transport, Sequestration, and Translocation in Plants

Lithium absorption and accumulation is different among plant species. There are plants that are bioaccumulators or hyperaccumulators of Li [24]. The Asteraceae and Solanaceae families and the halophyte group are Li accumulators, while citrus plants are sensitive to this metal [9,25]. The species Brassica napus and B. oleracea accumulate up to 2590 and 3091 mg Li kg−1, respectively, making them excellent candidates for agromining and remediation studies [26].
In soil, Li has a weak sorption chemistry compared to other metals, but it increases with increasing pH. Its high affinity for clays is due to isomorphic substitution of Al3+ in the octahedral layer by Mg2+, which gives rise to a free position that Li+ can occupy. Li+ ions are selectively absorbed over other cations apparently in a non-exchangeable manner. Moreover, Li concentrations have been found to be proportional to those of Mg, probably due to their similarity in ionic radius [8,17] (Figure 1).
Furthermore, Li shares the same transporter as the K+ ion, and so it is easily translocated to the aboveground part. Because of this, the highest concentration of Li has been reported in leaf tissues compared to roots and bulbs [27,28].
As a mobile element, Li is easily absorbed by plants, although other factors including concentration, species, and genotype play a main role in absorption. In addition, the structure of the roots plays a pivotal role in the process [20].
The exact mechanism of Li+ absorption in plants has not been established, although two absorption and transport hypotheses have been proposed. In the first one, Li+ uptake occurs via symplast through passive transport, using transporters of cations such as Na+, K+, and Ca2+ (entry into the endodermis of root ciliated cells crossing from cell to cell through plasmodesmata until passing through the Caspary band and entering the xylem). In the second one, Li enters through the apoplast of the cells, but when blocked by the Caspary band it must be incorporated into the symplast in order to reach the xylem. This process may be a tolerance mechanism to relieve stress and keep Li+ retained in the apoplast (Figure 2) [19].
Several putative Li transporters are known, such as High-affinity Potassium Transporters (i.e., HKTs); Low-affinity Cation Transporters (i.e., LCT1); and Non-Selective Cation Channels (i.e., NSCC), which play an important role in allowing Li to enter root cells and accumulate in the cytosol. In addition, HKTs transport Li+ into the xylem, where Li+ follows the water flow to reach shoots and leaves (Figure 3) [8,19]. In the phloem, few ions enter, and some remain immobile, whereas others return to the root; in plants treated with high Li doses, it accumulates mainly in the vacuoles and in the cell wall [29,30,31] (Figure 2). The use of these transporters is related to the ionic radius of Li+ similar to other ions of essential elements as shown in Figure 1.
The translocation of Li and immobilization occur in plant leaves [32], and positive (stimulatory), neutral, or negative (inhibitory) responses may differ among species [25]. Li toxicity will depend on the concentration, exposure time, and age of the plant; however, there are still few studies on phytotoxicity, absorption, and accumulation of Li [20].
The sequestration of Li in cell organelles is the main adaptation and response strategy to stress in plants. In this sense, vacuoles are the site of Li compartmentalization. This was observed in the accumulator bluish dogbane (Apocynum venetum), which is capable of storing 72% of Li in vacuoles [30].
According to Tanveer et al. [19], in wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants, Li is not transferred to young organs, but rather accumulates in adult leaves. This agrees with Kent [33], who observed that young plants accumulate Li in the roots during the first few days, but as the exposure time increases, Li accumulates in older leaves, where in addition to remaining immobile, the net water gain during growth decreases.

5. Li in Plant Metabolism and Physiology

In plants, we have 17 essential elements for optimal growth. Other elements such as the beneficial ones are useful at low concentrations; however, when optimal levels are exceeded, crop development and yield can be altered [19,34].
Various authors consider that Li can have beneficial effects at low concentrations and toxic effects at high doses [28,35]. Although it has been established that it is not necessary for growth, stimulating results have been observed in physiological development in plants such as maize (Zea mays), wheat, and barley (Hordeum vulgare) [36].
In Arabidopsis thaliana, Li is a potent inducer of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase (ACC synthase), an enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC), a precursor molecule of ethylene formed from S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) [37]. Likewise, Li also stimulates the transcriptional expression of the SAM and pathogenesis-related proteins (PR) genes [18]. Additionally, in tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum) treated with Li+, accumulation of ethylene, salicylic acid, and gentisic acid was recorded; additionally, the expression of PR genes (PR-P, PR1, and PR5) was induced. This suggests that Li triggers a hypersensitive response to ethylene signaling [38]. The above is evidence that Li has toxic effects leading to senescence processes in higher plants. However, lithium can stimulate seed germination under dark conditions by inducing ethylene synthesis [39].
On the other hand, in humans and rats, polyamines (PAs) or biogenic amides have been shown to modulate neurotransmission and are responsible for the PA-mediated stress response (PSR) [40]. Lithium does not directly interfere with the activity of PAs-metabolizing enzymes; rather, it acts on the intact cell and interferes with stress-activated transduction pathways that converge to activate the PSR, probably at transcriptional or posttranscriptional levels, but may also be involved in posttranslational changes [41]. In higher plants, PAs regulate various physiological processes such as floral development, embryogenesis, organogenesis, fruit maturation and development, senescence, and responses to abiotic and biotic stress factors [42]. However, no effect of Li on the biosynthesis and metabolism of PAs has been shown in plants so far.
Lithium has been demonstrated to have a primary role in the metabolism of halophytic plants [9,18]. Li is absorbed by all plants, and low levels of Li stimulate many physiological parameters, such as biomass production, growth, yield, and maturation. In addition, Li has positive effects on processes such as photosynthesis, sugar translocation, enzymes, N metabolism, and disease resistance (Figure 4) [43].
Among the beneficial responses, Li can stimulate enzymatic activity by having a role as a cofactor. It has been proven that Li has an affinity with enzymes activated by Ca2+ and Mg2+ [25,43], though the specific function of Li+ ions in the process has not yet been established.
In maize, doses in the range of 1 to 64 mg Li dm−3 have stimulating effects [20]. In lettuce (Lactuca sativa), concentrations of Li2SO4 and LiOH between 7.5 and 22 mg dm−3 significantly increase root dry weight, specific leaf area, and stem diameter of plants [43]. In spinach (Spinacia oleracea) and mustard (Brassica juncea) plants grown in two soils, the addition of 40 mg Li2SO4 kg−1 showed that light soil texture and low light intensity enhanced Li uptake, resulting in increases in total fresh plant weight and dry leaf weight, as well as increases in foliar concentrations of K, Fe, Zn, and S in spinach; by contrast, in mustard, increases only in the S concentration were recorded [44].
However, the detailed molecular mechanisms whereby Li affects plant biology remain largely unknown. In Paracentrotus lividus embryos, the exposure to 30 mM LiCl for 24 or 48 h differentially affected the expression of genes related to development, either involved in signaling or transcriptional regulation [45]. Concentrations of Li ranging from 25 to 50 mg L−1 may increase plant growth and biomass but mechanisms underlying cis- or trans-regulatory variations remain poorly understood [46]. In Apocynum pictum, the application of 25 mmol LiCl L−1 increased germination percentage [47], which may be attributed to a possible effect on the mitotic cycle of cells [24]. Interestingly, more negative responses are reported in hydroponic media than with soil or foliar applications [46].

6. Phytotoxic Effects of Li

The toxic effects of Li on plats were first reported in 1871, when Li was found to cause death in wheat plants and reduction in biomass in rye (Secale cereale) [36]. High levels of Li are toxic to plants and can cause chlorosis, necrotic lesions, and leaf curl (Figure 4) [9,38].
Excess Li can inhibit rhythmic plant movement, pollen germination, root growth, and gravitropic response, and affect microtubule dephosphorylation [9]. Furthermore, exposure to 5 mM LiNO3 affects the development and germination of tobacco microspores [25,38]. Its teratogenic effects are attributed to the alteration of Ca2+ mobilization in the plasma membrane [48].
Doses higher than 10 mg Li L−1 in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cv. Siokra, and 16 mg Li L−1 in maize cv. Terrific caused growth retardation and toxic effects such as chlorosis and necrotic spots [49], symptoms that have also been observed in avocado (Perea americana) plants treated with 16 mg Li L−1 [50]. In maize, chlorosis, necrosis, and browning of leaves as well as thickening and shortening of the main root have also been reported when 64, 128, and 256 mg Li dm−3 were added to the nutrient solution [20].
In sunflower (Helianthus annuus), toxic effects have also been reported when 50 mg Li dm−3 was applied [9]. Cotton and red beet (Beta vulgaris) are more tolerant to Li compared to citrus plants such as sour orange (Citrus × aurantium), in which Li causes necrosis, chlorosis, and leaf abscission [50]. These same symptoms were found in tobacco when 50 mM LiCl was applied [38].
In common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cv. Blue Lake 290, the application of doses between 8 and 12 mg LiNO3 kg−1 caused marginal chlorosis, decreased leaf area, and fresh and dry weights of leaves, stems, and roots. These same concentrations increased stomatal diffusion causing partial stomatal closure (Figure 4), suggesting that Li affects plant-water relations [51].
In onion (Allium cepa), the application of 100 mg Li L−1 decreased the germination rate of bulbs and root length of seedlings [24]. In green amaranth (Amaranthus viridis), the application of 25 to 100 mg Li2SO4 L−1 reduced the average germination, speed of germination, speed of accumulated germination, coefficient of rate of germination, and germination percentage of seed [32].
In cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata), the application of 1 meq Li L−1 (6.94 mg Li L−1) and 10 meq Li L−1 (69.41 mg Li L−1) decreased the total dry weight by 50%; once absorbed by the plant, Li was mainly translocated to the outer leaves [52].
Li compounds produce differential effects on plants (Table 2). For example, when applying concentrations less than 50 mg LiCl L−1 in bluish dogbane (Amsonia tabernaemontana), Li negatively affected growth, germination, and root biomass, while the same concentration of LiNO3 affected only shoot biomass. Furthermore, concentrations between 50 and 500 mg L−1 of both sources reduced the content of chlorophylls a and b by 50% [16].

7. Interaction of Li with Other Elements, Nutrients, and Biomolecules

Li shows high affinity and similarity enabling it to replace essential elements such as K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ (Figure 1) [19,50], which represents a route of entry into plant cells by binding to sites not occupied by these elements [6]. Concentrations of 50 to 100 µg Li dm−3 in irrigation water alter the processes of absorption and distribution of essential elements in plants [20].
In plants, Li+ ions can alter biochemical processes through interaction with proteins and through modification of gene expression [19]. The best-known example is its relationship with the inositol triphosphate second messenger system, where Li+ is a non-competitive, rapid, and reversible inhibitor of the enzyme myo-inositol-1-phosphatase (IMP or IMPase), which participates in the recycling rate of the inositol second messenger and in the hydrolysis of myo-inositol phosphate. Li+ reduces the hydrolysis rate of myo-inositol-1-phosphate without altering the binding of the substrate or the Mg2+ ion to the IMPase according to research studies with animal systems [18,30].
Although the mechanism of action of Li in plants has not yet been established, the most accepted hypothesis is “inositol depletion”, since inositol monophosphatases are sensitive to Li+ ions, which causes a reduction in cellular inositol levels and inhibits the inositol cycle and Ca signaling [9,13,38].
In roots, the absorption interaction between Ca2+ and Li+ is so competitive or antagonistic that Ca2+ can inhibit Li+ absorption [56]. Ca2+ has the ability to prevent the toxicity and absorption of lighter minerals such as Li+, which has been observed in oat (Avena sativa), fodder beet (Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris), and Brassica juncea plants [8,19].
As previously indicated, Li can affect proteins of the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase (ACC synthase) family, which catalyzes the synthesis of ACC from S-adenosyl methionine (SAM), a precursor for the synthesis of the ethylene hormone [37].
The oxidative damage to the photosynthetic apparatus and the alteration of chlorophyll content caused by Li are due to the increased catalytic action of the enzymes chlorophyllase, pheophorbide a oxygenase (PHO), red chlorophyll catabolite (RCC) reductase (RCCR), and Mg-dechelatase, which are responsible for chlorophyll bleaching [19].
In sorghum plants (Sorghum vulgare) var. Tamaran, Li did not affect the photosynthetic processes, changing neither the rate of transpiration nor intercellular CO2 concentration in young leaves. However, the activity of the enzymes phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPCase), and the phosphorylation status of plants treated with 10 mM LiCl decreased [57].

8. Ranges of Tolerance, Cytotoxicity, and Genotoxicity of Li

The presence of high concentrations of Li+ can induce the formation of free radicals and oxidative stress in cells, which can damage macromolecules such as DNA, lipids, and proteins, and disrupt biochemical and physiological pathways that can limit plant growth [18,24].
The presence of Li2CO3 in onion meristematic roots decreased the mitotic index (MI) by 8.2, 19.4, and 38% with the application of 25, 50, and 100 mg Li2CO3 L−1 compared to the control, which is indicative of a delay in the mitotic division process [24].
Regarding the genotoxic effects of Li+, chromosomal abnormalities such as bridges, sticky chromosomes, fragments, uneven chromatin distribution, wandering chromosomes, reverse polarization, irregular mitosis, and multipolar anaphase were found when applying 25 to 20 mg Li L−1 [24]. Though Li has not been reported as a potent mutagenic agent [18], in onion cells the presence of DNA fragments increases as the concentration increases from 25 to 20 mg Li2CO3 L−1. In addition, the affinity of Li+ for DNA is due to the molecular coupling and interaction it has with the nitrogenous bases of DNA [24].
As a result of a meta-analysis of the existing recent literature investigating the impact of Li sources and levels on plant species under different growth conditions [46], it was concluded that the toxic effects of Li vary with Li source materials, with LiCl affecting germination and root biomass to a greater extent, while LiNO3 has more negative effects on shoot biomass. Lithium concentrations <50 mg L−1 influences physiological indicators, while 50–500 mg L−1 Li concentrations influence biochemical parameters. The dose-response relationship (EC50) values regarding the exposure medium of Li sources in plant species were ranges 24.6–196.7 mg kg−1. The uptake potential of Li is dose-dependent, and its translocation/bioaccumulation remains unknown. The toxic effects of Li exposure in plants vary as a function of medium, and, interestingly, more negative responses are reported in hydroponic systems than with soil or foliar applications.

9. Treatment with and Intake of Li in Humans

In animals and humans, Li is biologically important in various physiological processes, and although its mechanisms of action are not established, they are related to the functioning of some enzymes, hormones, vitamins, and growth factors [13,19,58].
In the medical field, it has been established that the use of small amounts of Li can have beneficial effects on human health, since this element has the therapeutic advantage of not being cumulative for humans and being even less toxic than beneficial elements, such as Zn [31,59]. Lithium is mostly supplied as Li2CO3 in psychiatry; however, it is also used in the forms of citrate, acetate, glutamate, nitrate, orotate, and sulfate as a treatment for bipolar disorder, depression, manic episodes, suicide risk, and schizophrenia [60,61,62].
Therapeutic doses of Li are different among authors. For instance, Jefferson and Greist [60] suggest doses of 1200 and 2100 mg Li2CO3 day−1, while Marshall [59] and Calabrese et al. [62] consider ranges from 600 to 1200 mg day−1 of Li2CO3 (113 to 226 mg of Li), and for LiC5H3N2O4 H2O (Li orotate) it is 120 mg per day (3.83 mg of Li). However, lower doses, even compared to those found naturally in foods, can be effective [61].
Li aspartate and Li orotate are the most widely available drugs due to their low-dose presentation and easy absorption. On the other hand, Li carbonate and Li citrate are easily ionized, causing them to be less diffuse when entering the cell [59]. This had been observed in a comparative study between Li orotate and Li carbonate in rats, where it was found that Li orotate is absorbed three times more than Li carbonate in the brain [63].
Daily Li intake figures for a 70 kg adult vary, with the EPA recommending between 650 and 3100 µg Li day−1 [8], others suggesting 1000 µg day−1, equivalent to 14.3 µg kg−1 of body weight [58,59,61], and 5 to 20 µg day−1 [62]. Recommended doses and daily intake limits in humans may vary in different regions of the world; Figure 5 shows an overview of what is reported in the literature. Lithium carbonate is used in psychiatry in doses close to the maximum permitted intake level. The target organ of Li toxicity is the central nervous system; therefore, it is used therapeutically to act on membrane transport proteins in the treatment of manic depression. In rats, the lethal dose of LiCl ranges between 526 and 840 mg per kg body weight. In humans, 5 g of LiCl can cause fatal poisoning. Blood concentrations of 10 mg Li L−1 result in slight intoxication in humans; increases to 15 mg Li L−1 cause speech disorders. Concentrations of 20 mg Li L-1 in blood may increase the risk of death [14].
In Chile, where lithium-rich salt flats can contain up to 1500 mg Li L−1, total lithium intake can reach 10 mg per day with no evidence of adverse effects for the local population. The minimum physiological lithium requirement of a human adult is less than 0.1 mg per day [14].

10. The Future of Li in Agriculture and Animal Production

In the agrifood area, the idea of biofortifying crops with Li has emerged [31] In fact, the nutritional benefits that Li can bring to the diet are promising, mainly in cereals; vegetables such as potato (Solanum tuberosum), cabbage, and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum); and mushrooms, where quality and yields would not be compromised [8,58].
Naturally, foods such as cocoa (Theobroma cacao), oats, seafood, algae, goji berries (Lycium barbarum), and egg yolks are important sources of Li and are considered “neurotonic” for their nutritional effects on the brain and central nervous system [59].
There are also studies on Li biofortification in poultry. In turkeys supplemented with 0.05, 0.10, and 0.15 mg Li kg−1 for 70 days, an increase in weight was observed, as well as an increase in the concentration of this element in the thigh, breast, and liver compared to control turkeys that did not receive Li [64].
In marine ecosystems, strong variations in Li are observed among organs, in line with the biochemical similarity between this element and Na during transport in the brain and in the osmoregulatory organs. The gills and kidneys of fish have high concentrations of Li (0.26 and 0.15 μg Li g−1, respectively). In contrast, low concentrations of Li (0.07 and 0.06 μg Li g−1, respectively) are found in fish liver and muscle [65]. These types of studies are fundamental for the use of Li in ocean farming and in other fish production systems based on aquaculture and the use of artificial reefs.
Given that the projected global food demand for 2050 proposes a healthy diet, the interest in nutrients that meet the needs to avoid diseases caused by the lack of elements such as Li deserves special attention [31], and there is still research to be performed on this topic. Recently, Li fortification was studied in five grape varieties (Vitis vinifera) using an organic fertilizer rich in Li (0.28 g L−1), where it was found that foliar supplementation of this element improves nutrient absorption and promotes the content of phenolic compounds, mainly in the skin of grapes, an important characteristic for wine production [66].
The excessive use of Li compounds in recent decades suggests that future generations will have higher consumption patterns and, consequently, the excessive presence of Li-based waste, which can produce excessive concentrations in soils and water bodies intended for agricultural use; therefore, it is necessary to carry out studies in plants that allow an understanding of the effects at different physiological stages and in different species, mainly those used for human consumption [32].

11. Conclusions

The processes of absorption and accumulation of lithium in plants are affected by different factors including the concentration of the ion in the growth medium, the chemical form, the species of plant, the age of the plant itself, and the method of application, among others. The beneficial or toxic results that Li can cause in plants depend on the concentration, exposure time, species, and genotype. Positive effects of Li in plants when applied at low concentrations (in the range of 24 to 196 mg L−1) suggests that this element can be successfully used in biostimulation and biofortification approaches, which, in the end, may benefit both plant and human health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.d.l.L.B.-V. and L.I.T.-T.; validation, F.C.G.-M., Y.L.F.-P. and R.A.M.-N.; formal analysis, M.d.l.L.B.-V., L.I.T.-T. and F.C.G.-M.; investigation, M.d.l.L.B.-V. and L.I.T.-T.; resources, L.I.T.-T., F.C.G.-M. and Y.L.F.-P.; data curation, L.I.T.-T. and Y.L.F.-P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.d.l.L.B.-V. and L.I.T.-T.; writing—review and editing, F.C.G.-M., Y.L.F.-P. and R.A.M.-N.; visualization, F.C.G.-M. and R.A.M.-N.; supervision, L.I.T.-T. and F.C.G.-M.; funding acquisition, L.I.T.-T., F.C.G.-M. and Y.L.F.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This review received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Postdoctoral Fellowships Program in Mexico of the National Council of Humanities, Sciences and Technologies (CONAHCYT) for the scholarship awarded to M.L.B.-V. (CVU 714545).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Habashi, F. Lithium, physical and chemical properties. In Encyclopedia of Metalloproteins, 1st ed.; Kretsinger, R.H., Uversky, V.N., Permyakov, E.A., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 1222–1223. [Google Scholar]
  2. Baran, E.J. Lithium in plants. In Plant Abiotic Stresses, Physiological Mechanisms Tools and Regulation, 1st ed.; Hemantaranjan, A., Ed.; Scientific Publishers: New Delhi, India, 2019; pp. 151–162. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sterba, J.; Krzemień, A.; Fernández, P.R.; García-Miranda, C.E.; Valverde, G.F. Lithium mining: Accelerating the transition to sustainable energy. Resour. Policy 2019, 62, 416–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sobolev, O.I.; Gutyj, B.V.; Darmohray, L.M.; Sobolieva, S.V.; Ivanina, V.V.; Kuzmenko, O.A.; Karkach, P.M.; Fesenko, V.F.; Bilkevych, V.V.; Mashkin1, Y.O.; et al. Lithium in the natural environment and its migration in the trophic chain. Ukr. J. Ecol. 2019, 9, 195–203. [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson, C.E. Lithium in plants. In Lithium and Cell Physiology, 1st ed.; Bach, R.O., Gallicchio, V.S., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 25–46. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bernard, A. Lithium. In Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals, 4th ed.; Nordberg, G.F., Fowler, B.A., Nordberg, M., Eds.; Elsevier-Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2015; Volume 2, pp. 969–974. [Google Scholar]
  7. Schrauzer, G.N. Lithium in biosphere, distribution. In Encyclopedia of Metalloproteins, 1st ed.; Kretsinger, R.H., Uversky, V.N., Permyakov, E.A., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 1213–1217. [Google Scholar]
  8. Naeem, A.; Aslam, M.; Mühling, K.H. Lithium: Perspectives of nutritional beneficence, dietary intake, biogeochemistry, and biofortification of vegetables and mushrooms. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 798, 149249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hawrylak-Nowak, B.; Kalinowska, M.; Szymańska, M. A Study on selected physiological parameters of plants grown under lithium supplementation. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2012, 149, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wietelmann, U.; Steinbild, M. Lithium and lithium compounds. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, 7th ed.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2014; pp. 1–38. [Google Scholar]
  11. Franzaring, J.; Schlosser, S.; Damsohn, W.; Fangmeier, A. Regional differences in plant levels and investigations on the phytotoxicity of lithium. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 216, 858–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Miletíc, Z.; Markovíc, M.; Jaríc, S.; Radulovíc, N.; Sekulíc, D.; Mitrovíc, M.; Pavlovíc, P. Lithium and strontium accumulation in native and invasive plants of the Sava River: Implications for bioindication and phytoremediation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024, 270, 115875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shahzad, B.; Tanveer, M.; Hassan, W.; Shah, A.N.; Anjum, S.A.; Cheema, S.A.; Ali, I. Lithium toxicity in plants: Reasons, mechanisms and remediation possibilities–A review. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 107, 104–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Aral, H.; Vecchio-Sadus, A. Toxicity of lithium to humans and the environment—A literature review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2008, 70, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gad, S.C.; Pham, T. Lithium. In Encyclopedia of Toxicology, 3rd ed.; Wexler, P., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 94–95. [Google Scholar]
  16. Shakoor, N.; Adeel, M.; Azeem, I.; Ahmad, M.A.; Zain, M.; Abbas, A.; Zhou, P.; Li, Y.; Ming, X.; Rui, Y. Responses of agricultural plants to lithium pollution: Trends, meta-analysis, and perspectives. BioRxiv 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Aral, H.; Vecchio-Sadus, A. Lithium: Environmental Pollution and Health Effects. In Encyclopedia of Environmental Health, 1st ed.; Nriagu, J.O., Ed.; Elservier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 499–508. [Google Scholar]
  18. Duff, M.C.; Kuhne, W.W.; Halverson, N.V.; Chang, C.S.; Kitamura, E.; Hawthorn, L.; Martínez, N.E.; Stafford, C.; Milliken, C.E.; Caldwell, E.F.; et al. mRNA Transcript abundance during plant growth and the influence of Li+ exposure. Plant Sci. 2014, 229, 262–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tanveer, M.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Wang, L. Lithium in environment and potential targets to reduce lithium toxicity in plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 38, 1574–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Antonkiewicz, J.; Jasiewicz, C.; Koncewicz-Baran, M.; Bączek-Kwinta, R. Determination of lithium bioretention by maize under hydroponic conditions. Arch. Environ. Prot. 2017, 43, 94–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Environment Protection Regulation 2005 (EPR). Available online: https://www.legislation.act.gov.au/sl/2005-38 (accessed on 12 August 2024).
  22. Balaram, V.; Santosh, M.; Satyanarayanan, M.; Srinivas, N.; Gupta, H. Lithium: A review of applications, occurrence, exploration, extraction, rercycling, analysis, and environmental impact. Geosci. Front. 2024, 15, 101868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Adeel, M.; Zain, M.; Shakoor, N.; Ahmad, M.A.; Azeem, I.; Aziz, M.A.; Tulcan, R.X.S.; Rathore, A.; Tahir, M.; Horton, R.; et al. Global navigation of lithium in water bodies and emerging human health crisis. npj Clean Water 2023, 6, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kuloğlu, S.S.; Yalçin, E.; Çavuşoğlu, K.; Acar, A. Dose-dependent toxicity profile and genotoxicity mechanism of lithium carbonate. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 13504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kalinowska, M.; Hawrylak-Nowak, B.; Szymańska, M. The influence of two lithium forms on the growth, L-ascorbic acid content and lithium accumulation in lettuce plants. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2013, 152, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kavanagh, L.; Keohane, J.; Cabellos, G.G.; Lloyd, A.; Cleary, J. Induced plant accumulation of lithium. Geosciences 2018, 8, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kabata-Pendias, A.; Mukherjee, A.B. Trace Elements of Group 12 (Previously Group IIb). In Trace Elements from Soil to Human, 1st ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2007; pp. 283–319. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ammari, T.G.; Al-Zu’bi, Y.; Abu-Baker, S.; Dababneh, B.; Gnemat, W.; Tahboub, A. The occurrence of lithium in the environment of the Jordan Valley and its transfer into the food chain. Environ. Geochem. Health 2011, 33, 427–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. DalCorso, G.; Manara, A.; Piasentin, S.; Furini, A. Nutrient metal elements in plants. Metallomics 2014, 6, 1770–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qiao, L.; Tanveer, M.; Wang, L.; Tian, C. Subcellular distribution and chemical forms of lithium in Li-accumulator Apocynum venetum. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 132, 341–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chan, G.A.H.; dos Santos, G.R.; Dias, M.A.R.; da Silva, D.B.; Ramos, D.P.; Rodrigues, L.U.; Barilli, J.; Moreira, P.S.; Mendez, D.F.S.; Ferrari, J.M.; et al. Chia biofortification with lithium sources applied by foliar fertilization. Am. Acad. Sci. Res. J. Eng. Technol. Sci. 2021, 75, 121–137. [Google Scholar]
  32. Gayathri, N.; Sailesh, A.R.; Srinivas, N. Effect of lithium on seed germination and plant growth of Amaranthus viridis. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2022, 14, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kent, N.L. Absorption, translocation and ultimate fate of lithium in the wheat plant. New Phytol. 1941, 40, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Alcántar, G.G.; Trejo-Téllez, L.I.; Gómez-Merino, F.C. Nutrición de Cultivos, 2nd ed.; Colegio de Postgraduados: Guadalajara, Jal, Mexico, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  35. Bahamonde, H.A.; Fernández, V.; Gyenge, J.; Mattenet, F.; Peri, P.L. Essential nutrient and trace element foliar resorption of two co-existing Nothofagus species grown under different environmental conditions in southern Patagonia. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Brenchley, W.E. The action on the growth of crops of small percentages of certain metallic compounds when applied with ordinary artificial fertilisers. J. Agric. Sci. 1932, 22, 704–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liang, X.; Shen, N.F.; Theologis, A. Li+-regulated 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1996, 10, 1027–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Naranjo, M.A.; Romero, C.; Bellés, J.M.; Montesinos, C.; Vicente, O.; Serrano, R. Lithium treatment induces a hypersensitive-like response in tobacco. Planta 2003, 217, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ahammed, G.J.; Gantait, S.; Mitra, M.; Yang, Y.; Li, X. Role of ethylene crosstalk in seed germination and early seedling development: A review. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 151, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Squassina, A.; Manchia, M.; Chillotti, C.; Deiana, V.; Congiu, D.; Paribello, F.; Roncada, P.; Soggiu, A.; Piras, C.; Urbani, A.; et al. Differential effect of lithium on spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase expression in suicidal behaviour. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013, 16, 2209–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gilad, G.M.; Gilad, V.H. Overview of the brain polyamine-stress-response: Regulation, development, and modulation by lithium and role in cell survival. Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 2003, 23, 637–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, D.; Shao, Q.; Yin, L.; Younis, A.; Zheng, B. Polyamine function in plants: Metabolism, regulation on development, and roles in abiotic stress responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 9, 1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. da Silva, R.R.; de Faria, A.J.G.; Alexandrino, G.d.C.; Ribeiro, E.A.; dos Santos, A.C.M.; Deusdara, T.T.; do Nascimento, I.R.; Nascimento, V.L. Enrichment of lithium in lettuce plants through agronomic biofortification. J. Plant Nutr. 2019, 42, 2102–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Makus, D.J.; Zibilske, L.; Lester, G. Effect of light intensity, soil type, and lithium addition on spinach and mustard greens leaf constituents. Subtrop. Plant Sci. 2006, 58, 35–41. [Google Scholar]
  45. Bonaventura, R.; Costa, C.; Deidda, I.; Zito, F.; Russo, R. Gene expression analysis of the stress response to lithium, nickel, and zinc in Paracentrotus lividus Embryos. Toxics 2022, 10, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Shakoor, N.; Adeel, M.; Azeem, I.; Ahmad, M.A.; Zain, M.; Abbas, A.; Hussain, M.; Jiang, Y.; Zhou, P.; Li, Y.; et al. Interplay of higher plants with lithium pollution: Global trends, meta-analysis, and perspectives. Chemosphere 2023, 310, 136663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jiang, L.; Wang, L.; Zhang, L.; Tian, C. Tolerance and accumulation of lithium in Apocynum pictum Schrenk. PeerJ 2018, 6, e5559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zonia, L.E.; Tupý, J. Lithium treatment of Nicotiana tabacum microspores blocks polar nuclear migration, disrupts the partitioning of membrane-associated Ca2+, and induces symmetrical mitosis. Sex. Plant Reprod. 1995, 8, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Allender, W.J.; Cresswell, G.C.; Kaldor, J.; Kennedy, I.R. Effect of lithium and lanthanum on herbicide induced hormesis in hydroponically-grown cotton and corn. J. Plant Nutr. 1997, 20, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bingham, F.T.; Bradford, G.R.; Page, A.L. Toxicity of lithium to plants. Calif. Agric. 1964, 18, 6–7. [Google Scholar]
  51. McStay, N.G.; Rogers, H.H.; Anderson, C.E. Effects of lithium on Phaseolus vulgaris L. Sci. Total Environ. 1980, 16, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hara, T.; Sonoda, Y.; Iwai, I. Growth response of cabbage plants to lithium, sodium, and rubidium under water culture conditions. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1977, 23, 531–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Magalhães, J.R.; Wilcox, G.E.; Rocha, A.N.F.; Silva, F.L.I.M. Research on lithium-phytological metabolism and recovery of hypo-lithium. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 1990, 25, 1781–1787. [Google Scholar]
  54. Li, X.; Gao, P.; Gjetvaj, B.; Westcott, N.; Gruber, M.Y. Analysis of the metabolome and transcriptome of Brassica carinata seedlings after lithium chloride exposure. Plant Sci. 2009, 177, 68–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Stolarz, M.; Król, E.; Dziubińska, H. Lithium distinguishes between growth and circumnutation and augments glutamate-induced excitation of Helianthus annuus seedlings. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2015, 37, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Epstein, E. Calcium–lithium competition in absorption by plant roots. Nature 1960, 185, 705–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Monreal, J.A.; López-Baena, F.J.; Vidal, J.; Echevarría, C.; García-Mauriño, S. Effect of LiCl on phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase kinase and the phosphorylation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase in leaf disks and leaves of Sorghum vulgare. Planta 2007, 225, 801–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Schrauzer, G.N. Lithium: Occurrence, dietary intakes, nutritional essentiality. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2002, 21, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Marshall, T.M. Lithium as a nutrient. J. Am. Physicians Surg. 2015, 20, 104–109. [Google Scholar]
  60. Jefferson, J.W.; Greist, J.H. Lithium in psychiatry—A review. CNS Drugs 1994, 1, 448–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Szklarska, D.; Rzymski, P. Is lithium a micronutrient? From biological activity and epidemiological observation to food fortification. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2019, 189, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Calabrese, E.J.; Pressman, P.; Hayes, A.W.; Dhawan, G.; Kapoor, R.; Agathokleous, E.; Calabrese, V. Lithium and hormesis: Enhancement of adaptive responses and biological performance via hormetic mechanisms. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2023, 78, 127156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kling, M.A.; Manowitz, P.; Pollack, I.W. Rat brain and serum lithium concentrations after acute injections of lithium carbonate and orotate. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1978, 30, 368–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sobolev, O.; Borshch, O.O.; Riznychuk, I.; Kyshlaly, O. Fortification of meat products of geese farming with lithium by introducing it into poultry mixed feed. Agraarteadus J. Agric. Sci. 2022, 33, 154–161. [Google Scholar]
  65. Thibon, F.; Weppe, L.; Vigier, N.; Churlaud, C.; Lacoue-Labarthe, T.; Metian, M.; Cherel, Y.; Bustamante, P. Large-scale survey of lithium concentrations in marine organisms. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 751, 141453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhao, H.; Xie, X.; Read, P.; Loseke, B.; Gamet, S.; Li, W.; Xu, C. Biofortification with selenium and lithium improves nutraceutical properties of major winery grapes in the Midwestern United States. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech. 2021, 56, 825–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Graphical representation of the relative ionic radius (Å) of lithium (Li) compared to other chemical elements.
Figure 1. Graphical representation of the relative ionic radius (Å) of lithium (Li) compared to other chemical elements.
Horticulturae 10 01022 g001
Figure 2. Lithium (Li) uptake begins through root hairs, with ions moving through root cells via the apoplast and symplast. It is absorbed and transported by transporters HKT, LCT1, and NSCC, which allow Li to enter the cytosol, where it can remain or be transported to vacuoles by the transporter (NHX), where it can be compartmentalized as an adaptive strategy.
Figure 2. Lithium (Li) uptake begins through root hairs, with ions moving through root cells via the apoplast and symplast. It is absorbed and transported by transporters HKT, LCT1, and NSCC, which allow Li to enter the cytosol, where it can remain or be transported to vacuoles by the transporter (NHX), where it can be compartmentalized as an adaptive strategy.
Horticulturae 10 01022 g002
Figure 3. Modes of lithium (Li) entry into the cell. (A) Li entering root cells reaches the xylem through the LCT1, HKT1, and NSCC transporters located in the plasma membranes. (B) Li enters the xylem through the HKT and LCT1 transporters. (C) Once in the cytosol, Li can remain there or be transported by the NHX transporter into the vacuoles, where it can be compartmentalized as an adaptive strategy.
Figure 3. Modes of lithium (Li) entry into the cell. (A) Li entering root cells reaches the xylem through the LCT1, HKT1, and NSCC transporters located in the plasma membranes. (B) Li enters the xylem through the HKT and LCT1 transporters. (C) Once in the cytosol, Li can remain there or be transported by the NHX transporter into the vacuoles, where it can be compartmentalized as an adaptive strategy.
Horticulturae 10 01022 g003
Figure 4. Main stimulatory and inhibitory effects of lithium (Li) on plants. Responses are dependent on genotype, concentration, exposure time (acute or chronic), and probably plant biomass.
Figure 4. Main stimulatory and inhibitory effects of lithium (Li) on plants. Responses are dependent on genotype, concentration, exposure time (acute or chronic), and probably plant biomass.
Horticulturae 10 01022 g004
Figure 5. Overview of reported lithium (Li) doses in humans.
Figure 5. Overview of reported lithium (Li) doses in humans.
Horticulturae 10 01022 g005
Table 1. Physical and chemical properties of lithium (Li) and its main compounds [1,10].
Table 1. Physical and chemical properties of lithium (Li) and its main compounds [1,10].
Name (Formula)Atomic Mass
(g mol−1)
Oxidation StateBoiling Point (°C)Melting Point (°C)Density
(g cm−3)
Solubilityn-Octanol/Water
Partition Coefficient (Log KOW)
Lithium (Li+)6.94+11342180.540.53------
Li molybdate (Li2MoO4)173.82+1---700.002.66Highly water soluble---
Li hydroxide (LiOH)23.95+1450924.001.46Water soluble≈0.00 a
Li chloride (LiCl)42.39+11382614.002.07Water soluble−2.66
Li carbonate (Li2CO3)70.02+1---726.002.10Water soluble−6.19
--- No data available. a Data reported for LiOH H2O.
Table 2. Beneficial and toxic effects of lithium (Li) compounds on different plant species.
Table 2. Beneficial and toxic effects of lithium (Li) compounds on different plant species.
PlantConcentrationEffectsReferences
Cabbage
(Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) cv. Nagaoka
1 and 10 meq Li L−1Total dry weight decreased by 50%[52]
Common bean
(Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Bush Blue Lake 290
4 mg LiNO3 kg−1


>4 mg LiNO3 kg−1
Increases in plant height, fresh weight, and leaf area.

Partial closure of stomata and an effect on water relations
[51]
Radish
(Raphanus sativus L.)
1 mM LiNO3


2 mM LiNO3
Increase in dry weight of leaves and bulb

Reduction in dry weight of leaves and bulb
[53]
Lettuce
(Lactuca sativa L.)
1–2 mM LiNO3Significant increase in dry weight of leaves[53]
Watercress
(Nasturtium officinale L.)
1 mM LiNO3Significant increase in dry weight of leaves[53]
Tobacco
(Nicotiana tabacum L.)
50 mM LiClGrowth inhibition and leaf necrosis[38]
Spinach
(Spinacia oleracea) cv. Samich
40 mg Li2SO4 kg−1Increase in biomass[44]
Mustard greens
(Brassica juncea) cv. Florida Broadleaf
40 mg Li2SO4 kg−1Increase in biomass[44]
Abyssinian mustard
(Brassica carinata)
0.03–0.3 mM LiCl


30–120 mM LiCl
Increase in radicle length at germination and fresh weight

Reduces germination rate, fresh weight, and chlorophyll concentration
Increases anthocyanins
[54]
Sunflower
(Helianthus annuus L.)
50 mg LiCl dm−3Necrosis in leaves, reduction of dry biomass in shoots and leaf area
Increased levels of lipid peroxidation
[9]
Maize
(Zea mays L.) var. saccharata Kcke, cv. Zlota Karlowa
50 mg LiCl dm−3



5 mg LiCl dm−3
Necrosis in leaves, reduction in dry biomass, decrease in photosynthetic pigment content, and increase in lipid peroxidation levels

Increased aboveground biomass and leaf area
[9]
Lettuce
(Lactuca sativa L.) var. capitata cv. Justyna
100 mg LiOH or LiCl dm−3


50 mg LiOH dm−3


2.5 mg LiOH dm−3
Necrosis, inhibition of growth and yield


Reduction in fresh weight of shoots and roots

Increased fresh root weight
[25]
Sunflower
(Helianthus annuus L.)
0.2, 0.5, 5, 10, 60, and 80 mM LiClReduction in hypocotyl length[55]
Kendyr
(Apocynum pictum Schrenk)
25 mmol LiCl


100–400 mmol LiCl


200–400 mmol LiCl
Increased seed germination percentage

Decrease in germination rate and percentage

Reduction in dry weight of leaves, stems, and roots
Decrease in chlorophyll a and b and carotene content
[47]
Lettuce
(Lactuca sativa L.)
7.5 to 22 mg Li2SO4
or LiOH dm−3


40 mg Li2SO4 dm−3
Increases dry root weight, specific leaf area, and stem diameter

Reduced stem diameter, root dry weight, total leaf area, plant height, and leaf dry weight
[43]
Onion
(Allium cepa L.)
100 mg Li2SO4 L−1Decreased germination rate and root length[24]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Buendía-Valverde, M.d.l.L.; Gómez-Merino, F.C.; Fernández-Pavía, Y.L.; Mateos-Nava, R.A.; Trejo-Téllez, L.I. Lithium: An Element with Potential for Biostimulation and Biofortification Approaches in Plants. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 1022. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101022

AMA Style

Buendía-Valverde MdlL, Gómez-Merino FC, Fernández-Pavía YL, Mateos-Nava RA, Trejo-Téllez LI. Lithium: An Element with Potential for Biostimulation and Biofortification Approaches in Plants. Horticulturae. 2024; 10(10):1022. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101022

Chicago/Turabian Style

Buendía-Valverde, María de la Luz, Fernando Carlos Gómez-Merino, Yolanda Leticia Fernández-Pavía, Rodrigo Aníbal Mateos-Nava, and Libia Iris Trejo-Téllez. 2024. "Lithium: An Element with Potential for Biostimulation and Biofortification Approaches in Plants" Horticulturae 10, no. 10: 1022. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101022

APA Style

Buendía-Valverde, M. d. l. L., Gómez-Merino, F. C., Fernández-Pavía, Y. L., Mateos-Nava, R. A., & Trejo-Téllez, L. I. (2024). Lithium: An Element with Potential for Biostimulation and Biofortification Approaches in Plants. Horticulturae, 10(10), 1022. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101022

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop