Next Article in Journal
Industrial Production of Antibiotics in Fungi: Current State, Deciphering the Molecular Basis of Classical Strain Improvement and Increasing the Production of High-Yielding Strains by the Addition of Low-Molecular Weight Inducers
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Moisture Content and Silage Starter on the Fermentation Quality and In Vitro Digestibility of Waxy Corn Processing Byproduct Silage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Insights into the Biosynthesis of Succinic Acid by Actinobacillus succinogenes with the Help of Its Engineered Strains

The Key Laboratory of Industrial Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, School of Biotechnology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2023, 9(12), 1026; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9121026
Submission received: 19 November 2023 / Revised: 2 December 2023 / Accepted: 14 December 2023 / Published: 15 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Microbial Metabolism, Physiology & Genetics)

Abstract

:
Succinic acid (SA), a C4 tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediate, is used as raw material for bulk chemicals and specialty chemicals, such as tetrahydrofuran and 1,4-butanediol, as well as also being used to synthesize the biodegradable biopolymers PBS (polymer poly (butylene succinate)). Actinobacillus succinogenes, which is facultative anaerobic and gram-negative, is one of the most promising natural SA-producing organisms, but genetic engineering of A. succinogenes is rare so far. In this study, a series of engineered strains was constructed using the pLGZ922 expression vector and a cytosine base editor (CBE) based on CRIPSR/Cas9; we found that phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) was more important for the CO2 fixation pathway than pyruvate carboxylase (PYC) in A. succinogenes, and the annotated oxaloacetic acid decarboxylase (Asuc_0301 and Asuc_0302) had little correlation with the SA synthesis pathway. The by-product pathway was closely related to cell growth, and overexpression of FDH was beneficial to growth, while the knockout of the ackA gene reduced the growth. For the first time, the hypothetic sugars and SA transporters were mined and identified in A. succinogenes, of which Asuc_0914 was responsible for glucose uptake, and Asuc_0715 and Asuc_0716 constituted SA exporters. This deepens the understanding of SA biosynthesis in A. succinogenes and is also valuable for SA production by fermentation.

1. Introduction

Production of chemicals and fuels from renewable resources is a promising route for sustainable development in the future. The chemical synthesis of chemicals has a risk of environmental pollution, and the sustainable production of a microbial fermentation method is increasingly favored [1,2,3]. Succinic acid (SA), one intermediate of the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA), is a widely high-value chemical and is applied in numerous fields, including food, chemicals, agriculture, and pharmaceuticals [1,4]. It is also used as a precursor to produce other derivatives such as adipic acid, tetrahydrofuran, and 1,4-butanediol. Microbial fermentation produces SA mainly through three TCA-related pathways: the reduction branch of the TCA cycle (rTCA pathway), the oxidation branch of the TCA cycle (oTCA pathway), and the glyoxylic acid cycle [5]. Under anaerobic conditions, it occurs mainly through rTCA with SA as the end product. In this pathway, catalytic reactions between phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PCK) and PEP carboxylase (PEPC) or between phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) and oxaloacetate (OAA) played an important role. OAA was converted to malic acid by malate dehydrogenase (MDH), then fumaric acid was converted by fumarase (FUM), and finally SA was obtained by fumarate reductase (FRD). Under aerobic conditions, SA was synthesized mainly through the oTCA pathway and the glyoxylate pathway (GAC pathway) [6]. SA appeared as an intermediate and was further converted to fumarate. To prevent the conversion of SA to FUM, the activity of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) must be inhibited [7,8,9,10,11] (Figure 1).
Many microorganisms, such as Actinobacillus succinogenes, Anaerobiospirillum succiniciproducens, Mannheimia succiniciproducens, Escherichia coli, Corynebacterium glutamicum, Yarrowia lipolytica, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, have been developed for SA production [2,12,13,14,15]. A. succinogenes is facultative anaerobic and gram-negative, and is isolated from the bovine rumen [16]. It can utilize various kinds of carbohydrates, such as glucose, xylose, sucrose, fructose, lactose, galactose, and maltose, and can tolerate high concentrations of glucose and succinate [16,17]. The fermentation products are mainly SA, along with some acetic acid (AA) and a small amount of formic acid (FA). Therefore, it is considered to be one of the most promising strains for SA production. However, A. succinogenes also has some disadvantages as a SA production platform, such as numerous auxotrophies and acid sensitivity [18,19,20]. Engineering of A. succinogenes is a promising method for further increasing SA production [21]. The strategies to promote SA biosynthesis mainly include redirecting carbon flow, balancing the redox ratio (NADH/NAD+), and optimizing CO2 supplementation [22,23,24,25,26]. The main by-products are AA and FA in A. succinogenes. Therefore, carbon flow is generally redirected by blocking the pathway of by-product synthesis and SA consumption. For example, AA can be effectively removed by inactivating the ackA gene and the inactivation of plfB effectively removes FA [27,28]. However, the removal of redundant metabolic branches resulted in the imbalance of the redox ratio (NADH/NAD+), which affected the normal cell growth and the accumulation of SA. In order to improve the accumulation of SA, the key enzymes of the SA synthesis pathway including FUM, PCK, and MDH were overexpressed to enhance the main metabolic pathway of SA, but SA production was not significantly enhanced [27].
In this study, the effects of increasing the CO2 fixation pathway, reducing the oxaloacetic acid outflow, and eliminating the production of the by-products acetic acid and formic acid in the synthesis of SA were investigated by using the pLGZ922 expression vector and a cytosine base editor (CBE) in A. succinogenes. In addition, genes associated with sugar transporters and SA transporters were mined and identified, which will useful in improving the fermentative production of SA by A. succinogenes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains, Plasmids, and Culture Conditions

The strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Supplementary Materials: Table S1, and the primers are listed in Supplementary Materials: Table S2. E. coli JM109 was used as the host for the plasmid clone and cultured with LB medium at 37 °C or on LB agar plates with ampicillin (100 μg/mL) when necessary. A. succinogenes M 2012036 (ZK) was anaerobically cultured with TSB medium at 37 °C or on TSB agar plates with ampicillin (100 μg/mL) when necessary. The fermentation medium was described in reference [29]. The sgRNAs were designed online (https://chopchop.cbu.cib.no/ accessed on 1 September 2022), and the protospacer sequences are listed in Supplementary Materials: Table S3.

2.2. Plasmid Construction

The pepc and pyc gene fragment was amplified from the Corynebacterium acetoacetophilus genome, respectively. The ppk gene fragment was amplified from the Pseudomonas aeruginosa genome. The codon-optimized DVfdh and CBfdh were synthesized by GE-NEWIZ, Inc. The gene fragments were ligated, respectively, to the expression vector plGZ922 by ClonExpress II One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme, China), yielding the expression vectors pLGZ-CBfdh, pLGZ-DVfdh, pLGZ-pepc, and pLGZ-pyc.
The cytidine base editor (CBE) base editor plasmid was constructed in a previous study (data not published). The linearized fragments with the target gene sgRNA were amplified using the CBE plasmid as a template by PCR, and transformed into E. coli JM109, yielding the plasmids Asuc_0914-Td-CBE, Asuc_0023-Td-CBE, Asuc_0715-Td-CBE, Asuc_0716-Td-CBE, Asuc_2056-Td-CBE, Asuc_0750-Td-CBE, Asuc_0301-Td-CBE, and Asuc_0302-Td-CBE.

2.3. Transformation and Gene-Silenced Mutant Screening of A. succinogenes

The method for the transformation refers to references [27,29].
After the gene-silenced plasmid was transformed into A. succinogenes, one colony was randomly picked and placed into TSB medium containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin and incubated anaerobically at 37 °C for 24 h. The cultures were spread on TSB agar plates until colonies were obtained. The colony PCR was performed by randomly picking 10 colonies, and the mutant was confirmed by DNA sequencing. A plasmid curing procedure was performed by subculture of mutants in TSB medium overnight and plating on TSBG agar without antibiotics. The target mutants that did not grow in the presence of antibiotics and that grew in the absence of antibiotics were the target strains.

2.4. Determination of Extracellular and Intracellular Glucose and SA Concentrations

A. succinogenes was cultivated anaerobically in 25 mL of TSB medium at 37 °C for 12–16 h, and a 10% v/v inoculum was added into shake flasks containing 50 g/L glucose fermentation medium with the pH regulator MgCO3 powder. The cultures were centrifuged at 7000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was used to determine the extracellular glucose and SA concentrations. Cells were suspended with PBS solution and washed twice. Finally, cells were broken by adding 1.5 mL 10% H2SO4, and the broken solution was used to determine the intracellular glucose and SA concentrations.

2.5. Fermentation and Analytical Methods

A. succinogenes was cultivated anaerobically in 25 mL of TSB medium at 37 °C for 12–16 h, and a 10% v/v inoculum was added into shake flasks containing 50 g/L glucose fermentation medium with the pH regulator MgCO3 powder for 72 h. For a 3 L bioreactor, the temperature and agitation were 38 °C and 200 rpm, respectively. MgCO3 was used as a pH regulator in the early stage of fermentation, and 3 M Na2CO3 was maintained at pH 6.5 in the late stage of fermentation. The initial glucose concentration was 35 g/L, and we supplemented the glucose to maintain it between 10 and 30 g/L when the glucose fell to below 10 g/L.
The optical density of A. succinogenes was measured by spectrophotometry at 660 nm (OD660). Glucose and organic acids were analyzed by HPLC. The special determination methods refer to reference [30].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Succinic acid Biosynthesis Pathway

3.1.1. Effect of Strengthening CO2 Fixation Pathway

SA was synthesized by the reductive C4 pathway (rTCA) in A. succinogenes, and the by-products, such as acetic acid and formic acid, were synthesized by the C3 pathway [20,27]. A key CO2-fixing enzyme has been reported to be phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PCK), which catalyzes the carboxylation of phosphoenolpyruvate with bicarbonate and ADP to generate oxaloacetic acid (OAA) and ATP. No gene encoding phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) and pyruvate carboxylase (PYC) was found in A. succinogenes [20]. The heterogeneous expression of PEPC and PYC in E. coli and C. glutamicum enhanced the C flow of the SA synthesis pathway and increased the SA production [31,32]. The fixation of CO2 in Corynebacterium acetoacidophilum depends on the fact that PYC catalyzes pyruvate and PEPC catalyzes phosphoenolpyruvate. Therefore, pyc and pepc genes from C. acetoacidophilum were introduced into A. succinogenes to strengthen the CO2 fixation pathway, respectively, yielding the strains ZK::pyc and ZK::pepc.
To investigate the effect on A. succinogenes after introducing the pyc and pepc genes, cell growth, glucose, and organic acid concentrations were measured by shake-flask fermentation (Figure 2a). The results showed that the SA produced by strain ZK::pyc was similar to the wild-type ZK (SA 27.15 g/L), but the growth was slightly decreased and the residual glucose concentration was higher, indicating that the expression of exogenous PYC delayed the fermentation of SA. The SA production of strain ZK::pepc (38.63 g/L) was significantly higher than that of the wild type and increased by 39%, and its effect on cell growth was small. Although the by-products acetic acid and lactic acid are slightly elevated, the conversion rate of glucose and SA was also significantly increased. These results suggested that PEPC was a suitable precursor in the fixation of CO2 of A. succinogenes, and overexpression of PEPC may enhance the carbon flow rate of the SA synthesis pathway, thus increasing the SA production.
Further, the above three strains were fed-batch fermented in a 3 L bioreactor (Figure 2b–d). The maximum OD660 of wild-type strain ZK was obtained at 7 h (up to 6.93), while that of strain ZK::pyc was 7.56 at 12 h, and strain ZK::pepc was 6.58 at 10 h, respectively. These results indicated that the overexpression of exogenous proteins delayed the growth of cells to a certain extent. After fermentation for 60 h, the SA concentration was 52.35 g/L and the conversion rate was 0.70 g/g in strain ZK, while the SA concentrations of strain ZK::pyc and strain ZK::pepc were 55.66 g/L and 59.47 g/L, and their conversion rates were 0.82 g/g and 0.79 g/g, respectively. This result was consistent with shake-flask fermentation, showing that the expression of PEPC from C. acetoacidophilum in A. succinogenes increased the conversion rate and SA production, indicating that increasing the expression of PEPC was beneficial to the SA synthesis of A. succinogenes.

3.1.2. Effect of Preventing Oxaloacetic Acid Outflow by Inactivation of Oxaloacetic Acid Decarboxylase

In biological metabolism, OAA can be decarboxylated by oxaloacetic acid decarboxylase to produce pyruvate. Based on the A. succinogenes genome (GenBank: CP000746.1), Asuc_0301 and Asuc_0302 were annotated as genes encoding oxaloacetic acid decarboxylase. To investigate the presence of OAA outflow in the SA biosynthesis of A. succinogenes, we attempted to silence the gene encoding oxaloacetate decarboxylase using a cytosine base editor (CBE) based on CRIPSR/Cas9. The gene-silenced strains ΔAsuc_0301 and ΔAsuc_0302 were obtained by introducing terminators into the gene-coding region of Asuc_0301 and Asuc_0302 (Figure 3a). The shake-flask fermentation results showed that, compared with strain ZK, the SA production of strains ΔAsuc_0301 and ΔAsuc_0302 decreased slightly and their growth deteriorated, indicating that the inactivation of genes Asuc_0301 and Asuc_0302 not only did not promote the synthesis of SA, but also affected cell growth (Figure 3b). These results indicated that this pathway may be related to cell growth in A. succinogenes, and has little correlation with the biosynthetic pathway of SA.

3.2. Effect of Formic Acid Pathway

Formic acid is mainly catalyzed by pyruvate formic acid lyase to produce pyruvate in A. succinogenes. Although the knockout of the plfB gene blocked the formic acid synthesis pathway, deletion of plfB affected cell growth and did not promote the SA synthesis pathway [27,28]. In addition, it was found that A. succinogenes can produce formic acid in the initial stage of fermentation, but with the extension of fermentation, formic acid can be gradually consumed to produce NADH and release CO2. To further investigate the effect of formic acid on the biosynthetic pathway of SA, formate dehydrogenase (FDH) of Candida boidinii and Desulfovibrio vulgaris was introduced into A. succinogenes to remove the formic acid, respectively, yielding strains ZK::CBfdh and ZK::DVfdh. The results of shake-flask fermentation are shown in Figure 4a. It was found that the SA yield of strain ZK::DVfdh was similar to that of strain ZK, indicating that the introduction of FDH from D. vulgaris had no significant effect on the SA synthesis of A. succinogenes. The SA production and OD660 of strain ZK::CBfdh were slightly higher than those of the wild type, and no formic acid production was detected, indicating that CBfdh might consume formic acid to generate NADH and CO2, which promoted cell growth and SA production. In order to further investigate the effect of CBfdh expression on A. succinogenes, strain ZK::CBfdh was fed-batch fermented in a 3 L fermenter. As shown in Figure 4b, the maximum OD660 of strain ZK::CBfdh was obtained (7.76) at 7 h. After fermentation for 60 h, the SA concentration was 52.72 g/L, and the conversion rate was 0.67 g/g, but its growth was better than that of strain ZK (Figure 2b). Furthermore, the changes in the fermentation parameters of strain ZK::CBfdh were observed when formic acid was added during the fermentation process. As shown in Figure 4c, strain ZK::CBfdh obtained a maximum OD660 at 10 h, up to 6.68. Formic acid produced by the strain was exhausted at 10 h, and 12 g formic acid was added at 12 h, which could be exhausted at 24–34 h. After fermentation for 60 h, the SA concentration was 52.13 g/L and the conversion rate was 0.79 g/g. These results showed that the introduction of CBfdh into A. succinogenes could consume more formic acid but had no significant effect on the synthesis of SA, indicating that formic acid metabolic pathways may not account for a high proportion of carbon metabolic flow in A. succinogenes.

3.3. Effect of Acetic Acid Pathway

Although the deletion of the ackA gene can reduce acetic acid synthesis, it also affects the growth of strains [27]. In order to verify the role of acetokinase again, the strain ΔackA::ackA was constructed by expressing ackA into the knockout strain ΔackA. The shake-flask fermentation results showed that, compared with the knockout strain, the acetic acid production of the strain ΔackA::ackA was slightly increased and the growth was also restored to a certain extent, suggesting that the ackA gene was successfully expressed and partly complemented ackA function in A. succinogenes (Figure 5a). The insignificant complementary effect may be due to insufficient expression, but it also confirmed that the ackA gene was necessary for cell growth and acetic acid synthesis. The production of acetic acid is accompanied by the production of ATP, and it is speculated that ATP is associated with cell growth. Polyphosphate AMP phosphotransferase of Pseudomonas aeruginosa can promote ATP production. Therefore, we introduced the ppk gene into strain ΔackA to construct strain ΔackA::ppk, and investigated its effects on cell growth and SA synthesis. The results showed that, compared with strain ΔackA, strain ΔackA::ppk had a better growth, but there was no significant difference in the production of SA, indicating that the introduction of ppk may promote the production of ATP and thus promote cell growth, and there seemed to be little correlation with the synthesis carbon flow of SA. Indeed, it was indicated that the synthesis pathway of acetic acid may be more associated with cell growth through the production of ATP.
To further investigate the effect of the by-product pathway on the SA synthesis pathway, CBfdh was introduced into strain ΔackA to eliminate formic acid and acetic acid during fermentation, yielding strain ΔackA::CBfdh. The results of shake-flask fermentation showed that strain ΔackA::CBfdh could slightly increase the SA yield (Figure 5a). To study the effect of strain ΔackA::CBfdh on SA production, strain ΔackA and strain ΔackA::CBfdh were fed-batch fermented in a 3 L fermenter. As shown in Figure 5b,c, the residual glucose of strain ΔackA was 4.53 g/L after fermentation for 60 h, and the maximum OD660, up to 6.37, was obtained at 14 h. No formic acid or acetic acid were detected in the fermentation process, and the yield of lactic acid was also reduced, with the concentration of SA production being 43.11 g/L and the conversion rate being 0.66 g/g. The results showed that the generation of acetic acid was eliminated after the ackA gene was knocked out, but the cell growth was affected, and the generation and conversion rate of SA were reduced. The residual glucose of strain ΔackA::CBfdh was 5.20 g/L after fermentation for 58 h, and the maximum OD660 was 7.14 when the strain was grown for 12 h. No formic acid was detected in the fermentation process, the acid production concentration was 42.24 g/L, and the conversion rate was 0.68 g/g. These results indicated that overexpression of CBfdh shortened the growth stagnation period of the strain, but slightly affected the SA production.
In the initial phase of fermentation, A. succinogenes obtains a brief energy boost by synthesizing acetic acid to initiate growth [33]. The effect of the overexpression of FDH on growth was not as large as that of the deletion of ackA. CBfdh catalyzed formic acid to produce NADH, and AA synthesis was accompanied by ATP generation, suggesting that ATP may be more necessary than NADH for cell growth and SA production. The acetic acid synthesis pathway is closely related to the SA synthesis pathway as it provides the ATP required for cell growth in A. succinogenes.

3.4. Mining and Identification of Glucose Transporter

A. succinogenes naturally accumulates SA from a wide variety of carbohydrates, but no associated transport genes have been characterized. The ptsG gene, which encodes glucose-specific permease of the phosphotransferase system, protein EIICBglc, was inactivated in E. coli, resulting in a strong shift in metabolic pathway to the SA synthesis pathway during glucose fermentation [34]. It was found that two proteins, Asuc_0914 and Asuc_1575, were homologous with ptsG by BLAST analysis in A. succinogenes (Figure 6a). Among them, the Asuc_1575 gene is annotated as triosephosphate isomerase and the Asuc_0914 gene is annotated as the PTS system, sucrose-specific IIBC subunit. Therefore, these two genes were speculated to be involved in glucose transport. To investigate gene function, a stop codon was introduced into the coding region of the gene to yield a gene-silenced strain by using a cytosine base editor. However, no available target site was found in the coding region of gene Asuc_1575, so no Asuc_1575 gene-silenced strain was obtained. The effects of the wild type and the gene-silenced strain ΔAsuc_0914 on SA synthesis were determined by shake-flask fermentation. As shown in Figure 6b, the strain ΔAsuc_0914 showed efficient glucose utilization and increased SA production, representing a 1.1-fold increase and indicating that the inactivation of Asuc_0914 may promote the production of SA by participating in glucose transport.
To determine whether the Asuc_0914 gene is involved in glucose transport, intracellular and extracellular glucose concentrations at different fermentation times were measured. The results are shown in Figure 6c; extracellular glucose concentrations of strain ΔAsuc_0914 were all higher than those of the wild type, indicating that Asuc_0914 was involved in glucose transport, and its inactivation affected glucose uptake. The intracellular glucose concentration of strain ΔAsuc_0914 was similar to that of the wild type during the whole fermentation process, which may be caused by the homeostasis of cell regulation. Similar to E. coli, the inactivation of Asuc_0914 in A. succinogenes affects the uptake of glucose by reducing the rate of glucose uptake and causing the metabolic pathway to shift to the SA biosynthesis pathway. The accumulation of unserviceable intermediates that did not effectively convert to the target product was caused by the rapid uptake of glucose.

3.5. Mining and Identification of SA Transporter

3.5.1. Mining and Identification of SA Importer

In microbial fermentation production, the transport of products is also critical to the synthesis of target products. Two JEN family carboxylic acid transporters PkJEN2-1 and PkJEN2-2 of Pichia kudriavzevii can effectively transfer to SA [35]. BLAST analysis showed that Asuc_2056 had 18.99% homology with PkJEN2-1, and Asuc_0750 had 21.64% homology with PkJEN2-1 (Figure 7a). It was speculated that Asuc_2056 and Asuc_0750 may be SA transporters in A. succinogenes. Similarly, by introducing terminators into the coding regions of the Asuc_2056 and Asuc_0750 genes by cytosine base editor, respectively, the gene-silenced strains ΔAsuc_2056 and ΔAsuc_0750 were obtained. The effect of gene-inactivated strains on SA synthesis was determined by shake-flask fermentation. The results showed that the SA yields of the two gene-silenced strains were similar to that of the wild type, suggesting that Asuc_2056 and Asuc_0750 had no significant effect on the synthesis of SA, which may be due to the difference in genetic background (Figure 7b). This is consistent with our study that knocking out the JEN2 transporter in Issatchenkia orientalis also did not promote SA synthesis [14].

3.5.2. Mining and Identification of SA Exporter

SucE1 of C. glutamicum and yjjPB of E. coli were identified as SA exporters [36,37]. BLAST analysis showed that Asuc_0023 had 29.93% homology with SucE1, Asuc_0716 had 49.23% homology with yjjP, and Asuc_0715 had 50.96% homology with yjjB (Figure 8a). Asuc_0716 and Asuc_0715 are also in one operon and have 49.88% homology with yjjPB. It is speculated that Asuc_0716 and Asuc_0715 may be SA exporters of A. succinogenes. Similarly, introducing terminators into the coding regions of Asuc_0023, Asuc_0716, and Asuc_0715, respectively, yielded the strains ΔAsuc_0023, ΔAsuc_0716, and ΔAsuc_0715. The effect of the gene-inactivated strain on SA synthesis was determined by shake-flask fermentation. As shown in Figure 8b, there was no significant difference in the SA production of strain ΔAsuc_0023 compared with the wild type, indicating that Asuc_0023 may not be involved in the transport of SA. The growth of the ΔAsuc_0715 and ΔAsuc_0716 strains deteriorated, and the yield and conversion rate of SA decreased significantly, indicating that Asuc_0715 and Asuc_0716 may be SA transporters which are involved in SA output. After the inactivation of the two genes, the intracellular SA could not be transported out to affect cell homeostasis, resulting in poor cell growth and SA synthesis. To further determine the effect of Asuc_0715 and Asuc_0716 on SA synthesis, a double gene-silenced strain ΔAsuc_0715-0716 was constructed. The shake-flask results showed (Figure 8b) that, compared with the wild type, the double gene silencer had poorer growth and lower SA production, indicating that Asuc_0715 and Asuc_0716 could affect SA synthesis. However, there was no significant difference in the growth and SA production of the double gene-silenced strains compared with the single gene-silenced strains, which may be due to the fact that cells can regulate the intracellular SA concentration to maintain cell homeostasis.
To identify whether Asuc_0715 and Asuc_0716 were SA exporters, the intracellular and extracellular SA concentrations of the three mutant strains at different fermentation times were measured. The results are shown in Figure 8c; extracellular SA concentration of the three mutants was lower than the wild type, while intracellular succinic acid concentration was higher than the wild type, indicating that the inactivation of Asuc_0715 and Asuc_0716 affected the exportation of intracellular SA, resulting in the accumulation of intracellular SA. The intracellular and extracellular SA concentrations of the three mutants were similar, suggesting that either Asuc_0715 or Asuc_0715 is important for SA exportation. Taken together, these results suggested that Asuc_0715 and Asuc_0716 were SA exporters and that any one of them was necessary for SA export in A. succinogenes.

4. Conclusions

The expression of PEPC and PYC from C. acetoacidophilum suggested that A. succinogenes tended to fix CO2 and produced SA through PEPC carboxykinase. Overexpression of FDH from Candida boidinii was beneficial to cell growth and removed the by-product formic acid. The deletion of the ackA gene can remove acetic acid, but is unfavorable to cell growth due to insufficient ATP supply. By silencing hypothetic glucose and SA transporter genes by base editor, it was found that Asuc_0914 was responsible for glucose uptake, and Asuc_0715 and Asuc_0716 constituted SA exporters that were important for SA production in A. succinogenes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fermentation9121026/s1, Table S1: the strains and plasmids used in this study; Table S2: the primers used in this study; Table S3: the PAM sequences used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.Z. and C.C.; methodology and investigation, C.C.; writing—original draft, C.C.; writing—review and editing, P.Z. and C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are presented in the manuscript and its Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhou, S.F.; Zhang, Y.L.; Wei, Z.W.; Park, S. Recent advances in metabolic engineering of microorganisms for the production of monomeric C3 and C4 chemical compounds. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 377, 128973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Vivek, N.; Okibe, M.C.; Amulya, K.; Jokodola, E.O.; Coulon, F.; Kumar Tyagi, V.; Lens, P.N.L.; Binod, P.; Vinod, K. Technological advancements in valorization of second generation (2G) feedstocks for bio-based succinic acid production. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 360, 127513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ewing, T.A.; Niels, N.; Lint, M.; Haveren, J.; Jeroen, H.; Es, D.S. Fermentation for the production of biobased chemicals in a circular economy: A perspective for the period 2022–2050. Green Chem. 2021, 24, 6373–6405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tong, U.; Jung, H.A.; Yoo-Sung, A.; Je, W.K.; Jong, A.L.; Eon, H.L. Metabolic engineering for the production of dicarboxylic acids and diamines. Metab. Eng. 2020, 58, 2–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, X.T.; Zhao, G.; Sun, S.J.; Fan, C.L.; Feng, X.J.; Xiong, P. Biosynthetic pathway and metabolic engineering of succinic acid. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 843887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lin, H.; Bennett, G.N.; San, K.Y. Fed-batch culture of a metabolically engineered Escherichia coli strain designed for high-level succinate production and yield under aerobic conditions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 90, 775–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Li, C.; Khai, L.O.; Cui, Z.Y.; Sang, Z.Y.; Li, X.T.; Patria, R.D.; Qi, Q.S.; Fickers, P.; Yan, J.B.; Lin, C.S.K. Promising advancement in fermentative succinic acid production by yeast hosts. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 401, 123414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, Y.X.; Wang, J.; Wang, D.; Feng, Q.I. Advancement in genetic engineering for production of succinic acid by Escherichia coli. J. Chin. Biotechnol. 2009, 29, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ahn, J.H.; Seo, H.; Park, W.; Seok, J.; Lee, J.A.; Kim, W.J.; Kim, G.B.; Kim, K.J.; Lee, S.Y. Enhanced succinic acid production by Mannheimia employing optimal malate dehydrogenase. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, X.J.; Zhou, Y.J.; Zhang, D. Engineering Corynebacterium crenatum for enhancing succinic acid production. J. Food Biochem. 2018, 42, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yuzbashev, T.V.; Yuzbasheva, E.Y.; Sobolevskaya, T.I.; Laptev, I.A.; Vybornaya, T.V.; Larina, A.S.; Matsui, K.; Fukui, K.; Sineoky, S.P. Production of succinic acid at low pH by a recombinant strain of the aerobic Yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010, 107, 673–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wieschalka, S.; Michael, B.B.; Eikmanns, B.B.J. Bio-based production of organic acids with Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb. Biotechnol. 2013, 6, 87–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Franco-Duarte, R.; Bessa, D.; Goncalves, F.; Martins, R.; Silva-Ferreira, A.C.; Schuller, D.; Sampaio, P.; Pais, C. Genomic and transcriptomic analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates with focus in succinic acid production. FEMS Yeast Res. 2017, 17, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tran, V.G.; Mishra, S.; Bhagwat, S.S.; Shafaei, S.; Shen, Y.h.; Allen, J.L.; Crosly, B.A.; Tan, S.I.; Fatma, Z.; Rabinowitz, J.D.; et al. An end-to-end pipeline for succinic acid production at an industrially relevant scale using Issatchenkia orientalis. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 6152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, C.; Yang, X.F.; Gao, S.; Wang, H.M.; Lin, C.S.K. High efficiency succinic acid production from glycerol via in situ fibrous bed bioreactor with an engineered Yarrowia lipolytica. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 225, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Guettler, M.V.; Rumler, D.; Jain, M.K. Actinobacillus succinogenes sp. nov., a novel succinic-acid-producing strain from the bovine rumen. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1999, 49, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yang, Q.; Wu, M.; Dai, Z.X.; Xin, F.X.; Zhou, J.; Dong, W.L.; Ma, J.F.; Jiang, M.; Zhang, W.M. Comprehensive investigation of succinic acid production by Actinobacillus succinogenes: A promising native succinic acid producer. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 2020, 14, 950–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hu, S.M.; You, Y.; Xia, F.F.; Liu, J.M.; Dai, W.C.; Liu, J.S.; Wang, Y.H. Genome shuffling improved acid-tolerance and succinic acid production of Actinobacillus succinogenes. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 28, 817–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, W.M.; Tao, W.X.; Wu, M.; Xin, F.X.; Dong, W.L.; Zhou, J.; Gu, J.C.; Ma, J.F.; Jiang, M. Adaptive evolution improves acid tolerance and succinic acid production in Actinobacillus succinogenes. Process Biochem. 2020, 98, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. McKinlay, J.B.; Laivenieks, M.; Schindler, B.D.; McKinlay, A.A.; Siddaramappa, S.; Challacombe, J.F.; Lowry, S.R.; Clum, A.; Lapidus, A.L.; Burkhart, K.B.; et al. A genomic perspective on the potential of Actinobacillus succinogenes for industrial succinate production. BMC Genom. 2010, 11, 680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dessie, W.; Xin, F.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, Y.; Wu, H.; Ma, J.; Jiang, M. Opportunities, challenges, and future perspectives of succinic acid production by Actinobacillus succinogenes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 9893–9910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xu, H.T.; Zhou, Z.H.; Wang, C.; Chen, Z.J.; Cai, H. Enhanced succinic acid production in Corynebacterium glutamicum with increasing the available NADH supply and glucose consumption rate by decreasing H+-ATPase activity. Biotechnol. Lett. 2016, 38, 1181–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhou, Z.H.; Wang, C.; Chen, Y.L.; Zhang, K.; Xu, H.T.; Cai, H.; Chen, Z.J. Increasing available NADH supply during succinic acid production by Corynebacterium glutamicum. Biotechnol. Prog. 2015, 31, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liu, X.T.; Feng, X.J.; Ding, Y.M.; Gao, W.J.; Xian, M.; Wang, J.C.; Zhao, J. Characterization and directed evolution of propionyl-CoA carboxylase and its application in succinate biosynthetic pathway with two CO2 fixation reactions. Metab. Eng. 2020, 62, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lee, S.J.; Song, H.; Lee, S.Y. Genome-based metabolic engineering of Mannheimia succiniciproducens for succinic acid production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 1939–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Babaei, M.; Kildegaard, K.R.; Niaei, A.; Hosseini, M.; Ebrahimi, S.; Sudarsan, S.; Angelidaki, I.; Borodina, I. Engineering oleaginous yeast as the host for fermentative succinic acid production from glucose. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guarnieri, M.T.; Chou, Y.C.; Salvachúa, D.; Mohagheghi, A.; Beckham, G.T. Metabolic engineering of Actinobacillus succinogenes provides insights into succinic acid biosynthesis. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2017, 83, e00996-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, W.; Yang, Q.; Wu, M.; Liu, H.J.; Zhou, J.; Dong, W.L.; Ma, J.F.; Jiang, M.; Xin, F.X. Metabolic regulation of organic acid biosynthesis in Actinobacillus succinogenes. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, C.M.; Zhang, Q.; Qian, J.J.; Wu, D.; Chen, P.C.; Zheng, P. Effect of the Gad system on Actinobacillus succinogenes during acid stress. Syst. Microbiol. Biomanuf. 2022, 2, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, C.M.; Zheng, P. Effects of down-regulation of ackA expression by CRISPR-dCpf1 on succinic acid production in Actinobacillus succinogenes. AMB Express 2023, 13, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Litsanov, B.; Kabus, A.; Brocker, M.; Bott, M. Efficient aerobic succinate production from glucose in minimal medium with Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb. Biotechnol. 2012, 5, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lin, H.; San, K.Y.; Bennett, G.N. Effect of Sorghum vulgare phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase and Lactococcus lactis pyruvate carboxylase coexpression on succinate production in mutant strains of Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 67, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lexow, W.G.; Mokwatlo, S.C.; Brink, H.G.; Nicol, W. Identifying energy extraction optimisation strategies of Actinobacillus succinogenes. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chatterjee, R.; Millard, C.S.; Champion, K.; Clark, D.P.; Donnelly, M.I. Mutation of the ptsG gene results in increased production of succinate in fermentation of glucose by Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2001, 67, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Xi, Y.Y.; Zhan, T.; Xu, H.T.; Chen, J.; Bi, C.H.; Fan, F.Y.; Zhang, X.L. Characterization of JEN family carboxylate transporters from the acid-tolerant yeast Pichia kudriavzevii and their applications in succinic acid production. Microb. Biotechnol. 2021, 14, 1130–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fukui, K.; Nanatani, K.; Hara, Y.; Yamakami, S.; Yahagi, D.; Chinen, A.; Tokura, M.; Abe, K. Escherichia coli yjjPB genes encode a succinate transporter important for succinate production. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2017, 81, 1837–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fukui, K.; Koseki, C.; Yamamoto, Y.; Nakamura, J.; Sasahara, A.; Yuji, R.; Hashiguchi, K.; Usuda, Y.; Matsui, K.; Kojima, H.; et al. Identification of succinate exporter in Corynebacterium glutamicum and its physiological roles under anaerobic conditions. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 154, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Biosynthetic pathway of SA. OAA: oxaloacetate; MAL: malate; FUM: fumarate; SA: succinic acid; SUCC: succinyl CoA; AKG: α-ketoglutarate; ICI: isocitrate; CIT: citrate; AcCoA: acetyl CoA; ACTP: acetyl phosphate; ACALD: acetaldehyde; ackA: acetokinase; pyc: pyruvic carboxylase; pta: phosphoacetyltransferase; pdc: pyruvate decarboxylase; adh: alcoholdehydrogenase; pflB: pyruvate formate-lyase; fdh: formate dehydrogenase; ldh: lactate dehydrogenase; pyk: pyruvate kinase; pck: phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; cit: citrate synthase; me: malic enzyme; mdh: malate dehydrogenase; fum: fumarase; sdh/frd: succinate dehydrogenase/fumarate reductase; suc: succinyl-CoA thiokinase; ogdc: oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex; icd: isocitrate dehydrogenase; acn: aconitase; cit: citrate synthase; acc: acetyl-coa carboxylase; mcr: malonyl-coa reductase; pcs: propionyl-CoA synthase; pcc: propionyl-CoA carboxylase; mmcEM: methylmalonyl-CoA exomerases and mutants.
Figure 1. Biosynthetic pathway of SA. OAA: oxaloacetate; MAL: malate; FUM: fumarate; SA: succinic acid; SUCC: succinyl CoA; AKG: α-ketoglutarate; ICI: isocitrate; CIT: citrate; AcCoA: acetyl CoA; ACTP: acetyl phosphate; ACALD: acetaldehyde; ackA: acetokinase; pyc: pyruvic carboxylase; pta: phosphoacetyltransferase; pdc: pyruvate decarboxylase; adh: alcoholdehydrogenase; pflB: pyruvate formate-lyase; fdh: formate dehydrogenase; ldh: lactate dehydrogenase; pyk: pyruvate kinase; pck: phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; cit: citrate synthase; me: malic enzyme; mdh: malate dehydrogenase; fum: fumarase; sdh/frd: succinate dehydrogenase/fumarate reductase; suc: succinyl-CoA thiokinase; ogdc: oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex; icd: isocitrate dehydrogenase; acn: aconitase; cit: citrate synthase; acc: acetyl-coa carboxylase; mcr: malonyl-coa reductase; pcs: propionyl-CoA synthase; pcc: propionyl-CoA carboxylase; mmcEM: methylmalonyl-CoA exomerases and mutants.
Fermentation 09 01026 g001
Figure 2. The results of shake-flask fermentations (a) and fed-batch fermentation by strains ZK (b), strains ZK::pyc (c), and strains ZK::pepc (d).
Figure 2. The results of shake-flask fermentations (a) and fed-batch fermentation by strains ZK (b), strains ZK::pyc (c), and strains ZK::pepc (d).
Fermentation 09 01026 g002
Figure 3. The sequencing results of STOP codons introduced in Asuc_0301 and Asuc_0302 (a) and the results of shake-flask fermentation (b). *: STOP codons.
Figure 3. The sequencing results of STOP codons introduced in Asuc_0301 and Asuc_0302 (a) and the results of shake-flask fermentation (b). *: STOP codons.
Fermentation 09 01026 g003
Figure 4. Evaluation of different fermentation and metabolic parameters in wild-type A. succinogenes and recombinants. (a) The shake-flask fermentation results of strains ZK, ZK::CBfdh, and ZK::DVfdh; (b) the fed-batch fermentation results of strain ZK::CBfdh; (c) the fed-batch fermentation results of strain ZK::CBfdh with 12 g FA. The added FA was marked with a red circle.
Figure 4. Evaluation of different fermentation and metabolic parameters in wild-type A. succinogenes and recombinants. (a) The shake-flask fermentation results of strains ZK, ZK::CBfdh, and ZK::DVfdh; (b) the fed-batch fermentation results of strain ZK::CBfdh; (c) the fed-batch fermentation results of strain ZK::CBfdh with 12 g FA. The added FA was marked with a red circle.
Fermentation 09 01026 g004
Figure 5. Evaluation of different fermentation and metabolic parameters in ΔackA and its derivates. (a) The shake-flask fermentation results of strain ΔackA and its derivates; (b) the fed-batch fermentation results of strain ΔackA; (c) the fed-batch fermentation results of strain ΔackA::CBfdh.
Figure 5. Evaluation of different fermentation and metabolic parameters in ΔackA and its derivates. (a) The shake-flask fermentation results of strain ΔackA and its derivates; (b) the fed-batch fermentation results of strain ΔackA; (c) the fed-batch fermentation results of strain ΔackA::CBfdh.
Fermentation 09 01026 g005
Figure 6. The results of amino acid sequence alignment, fermentation, and metabolic parameters in wild-type A. succinogenes and mutants. (a) The results of the amino acid sequence alignment of Asuc_1575, Asuc_0914, and ptsG; (b) the shake-flask fermentation results of strain ZK and its mutants; (c) the intracellular and extracellular glucose concentrations.
Figure 6. The results of amino acid sequence alignment, fermentation, and metabolic parameters in wild-type A. succinogenes and mutants. (a) The results of the amino acid sequence alignment of Asuc_1575, Asuc_0914, and ptsG; (b) the shake-flask fermentation results of strain ZK and its mutants; (c) the intracellular and extracellular glucose concentrations.
Fermentation 09 01026 g006
Figure 7. The results of amino acid sequence alignment, fermentation, and metabolic parameters in wild-type A. succinogenes and mutants. (a) The results of the amino acid sequence alignment of Asuc_2056 and JEN2-1, or Asuc_0750 and JEN2-2; (b) the shake-flask fermentation results of strain ZK and its mutants.
Figure 7. The results of amino acid sequence alignment, fermentation, and metabolic parameters in wild-type A. succinogenes and mutants. (a) The results of the amino acid sequence alignment of Asuc_2056 and JEN2-1, or Asuc_0750 and JEN2-2; (b) the shake-flask fermentation results of strain ZK and its mutants.
Fermentation 09 01026 g007
Figure 8. The results of amino acid sequence alignment, fermentation, and metabolic parameters in wild-type A. succinogenes and mutants. (a) The results of the amino acid sequence alignment of Asuc_0023 and SucE1, or Asuc_0715-0716 and yjjPB; (b) the shake-flask fermentation results of strain ZK and its mutants; (c) the intracellular and extracellular SA concentrations.
Figure 8. The results of amino acid sequence alignment, fermentation, and metabolic parameters in wild-type A. succinogenes and mutants. (a) The results of the amino acid sequence alignment of Asuc_0023 and SucE1, or Asuc_0715-0716 and yjjPB; (b) the shake-flask fermentation results of strain ZK and its mutants; (c) the intracellular and extracellular SA concentrations.
Fermentation 09 01026 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, C.; Zheng, P. New Insights into the Biosynthesis of Succinic Acid by Actinobacillus succinogenes with the Help of Its Engineered Strains. Fermentation 2023, 9, 1026. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9121026

AMA Style

Chen C, Zheng P. New Insights into the Biosynthesis of Succinic Acid by Actinobacillus succinogenes with the Help of Its Engineered Strains. Fermentation. 2023; 9(12):1026. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9121026

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Chunmei, and Pu Zheng. 2023. "New Insights into the Biosynthesis of Succinic Acid by Actinobacillus succinogenes with the Help of Its Engineered Strains" Fermentation 9, no. 12: 1026. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9121026

APA Style

Chen, C., & Zheng, P. (2023). New Insights into the Biosynthesis of Succinic Acid by Actinobacillus succinogenes with the Help of Its Engineered Strains. Fermentation, 9(12), 1026. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9121026

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop