Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Bacterial Cellulose Production from Waste Figs by Komagataeibacter xylinus
Next Article in Special Issue
Alternative Uses of Fermented Wheat Bran: A Mini Review
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of the Nutrient Value and In Vitro Rumen Fermentation Characteristics of Garlic Peel, Sweet Potato Vine, and Cotton Straw
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potential of Endophytic Microorganisms in Fermentative Processes Using Agro-Industrial Waste as Substrates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effects of Fermented Cauliflower Residue Feed on the Diarrhea Rate, Intestinal Morphology, Immune Indicators, and Intestinal Flora of Weaned Piglets

1
College of Life Science and Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730100, China
2
Key Laboratory of Biotechnology and Bioengineering of State Ethnic Affairs Commission, Biomedical Research Center, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730030, China
3
Experimental Teaching Department, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730100, China
4
State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Severe Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Key Laboratory for Zoonosis Research of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun 130062, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2024, 10(9), 465; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10090465
Submission received: 22 July 2024 / Revised: 5 September 2024 / Accepted: 8 September 2024 / Published: 9 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Waste as Feedstock for Fermentation)

Abstract

:
This study investigated the effects of incorporating fermented feed into the post-weaning piglet diet, with a focus on its impact on the growth, health, serum markers, immune function, diarrhea rate, and microbial community of post-weaning piglets. Forty-two post-weaning piglets (Duroc × [Landrace × Yorkshire], castrated male), with good health and similar weight (11.40 ± 1.36 kg) at 40 days of age, were randomly assigned to two groups. Throughout the trial, one group received a standard diet (control group) while the other one was given a diet supplemented with fermented feed (experimental group), respectively. The findings revealed that compared to the control group, the post-weaning piglets fed with fermented feed showed increased daily weight gain. The fermented feed also led to an increase in the height of villi in the duodenum or jejunum of post-weaning piglets (p < 0.05), accompanied by an improved ratio of villus height to crypt depth in the experimental group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the fermented feed enhanced the richness and diversity of the intestinal microbial community in post-weaning piglets (p < 0.05), particularly increasing the relative abundance of Lactobacillaceae and Bifidobacteriaceae. These findings demonstrate that incorporating the fermented feed into the diet can reduce the diarrhea rate, improve growth performance, enhance immune function, and promote intestinal development in post-weaning piglets.

1. Introduction

Pork is one of the main sources of protein in many regions around the world, providing essential amino acids, vitamins, and minerals, and is crucial for human nutrition and health [1]. In piglet production, infections from pathogen and various stress factors (cold exposure, weaning, dietary changes, and sudden environmental shifts) often trigger intestinal inflammation, which causes mucosal damage and microbial imbalance, resulting in poor growth and even sudden fatalities [2,3]. The weaning period represents a particularly critical window for the formation of the intestinal microbiota [4]. The intestinal microbial community of weaned piglets is highly susceptible to the stress of weaning, and thus easily influenced by external stimuli [4]. Feed additives can improve the nutritional components of animal feed, promote growth, enhance immunity, improve the physical properties of feed, or prevent diseases, among other purposes [5]. It is crucial to maintain intestinal health and minimize post-weaning stress by incorporating a range of feed additives, including peptides, organic and inorganic acids, prebiotics, probiotics, plant extracts, essential oils, and yeast [6]. Probiotics in feed additives refer to a class of microorganisms that are beneficial to the health of the animal’s gut [7]. These microorganisms mainly include lactic acid bacteria, bifidobacteria, etc. They are added to the feed of animals with the aim of promoting the growth of beneficial bacteria in the gut, suppressing the proliferation of harmful bacteria, thereby maintaining the balance of the gut flora, enhancing the animal’s digestive and absorptive capacity, improving immune function, reducing the occurrence of intestinal diseases, and promoting the growth and health of animals [8]. As feed additives, probiotics are widely used in livestock and poultry farming, helping to improve the production performance and health level of animals [9]. Furthermore, utilizing high-quality feed ingredients can improve digestibility and promote immunological characteristics.
Fermented feed, a green, environmentally friendly, and innovative alternative to conventional feed, offers a means to replace the use of antibiotics, improve animal health, enhance the nutritional value and utilization of feed, and improve the ecological environment of animal husbandry [10]. Fermented feed contains a large number of small molecules that are easily absorbed by the animal’s intestines, various unsaturated fatty acids, and aromatic substances, which can improve palatability and thereby boost feed consumption [11]. In recent years, the development and application of fermented feed technology have become a hot topic in the feed industry. The most commonly used microorganisms in fermented feed are lactic acid bacteria, yeast, and Bacillus subtilis [12]. Studies indicate that feeding sows with fermented feed can significantly increase key elements such as the number of piglets born, the number of live piglets, the birth weight of piglets, the average daily gain, and the average weaning weight, thereby exerting a certain promoting effect on the reproductive performance of sows and the growth performance of piglets [12]. Previous studies have indicated that fermented bamboo shoot residue feed has a positive impact on the growth performance, serum parameters, and intestinal microbial population of weaned piglets [13].
Cauliflower is a nutritionally rich vegetable, packed with vitamins such as Vitamin C, Vitamin K, Vitamin B6, folate, and dietary fiber, as well as essential minerals like potassium, magnesium, and manganese [14]. It also contains antioxidants, including glucosinolates, which help protect cells from oxidative damage [15]. Moreover, cauliflower is high in dietary fiber, which aids in digestive health. These characteristics make cauliflower an important part of a healthy diet. However, a large amount of vegetable waste generated from the leaves during the processing of cauliflower has become one of the main sources of agricultural non-point source pollution [16]. Due to their perishable nature, the decomposition of cauliflower residue produces foul-smelling gases and leachate, which not only pollute the environment and soil but also promote the growth and spread of pathogens, thereby posing significant environmental pollution and potential health risks to local residents. Therefore, the rational development and utilization of agricultural waste such as cauliflower residue are beneficial for safeguarding the rural ecological environment and are of great significance in promoting the development of sustainable agriculture. In the previous studies, we found that the fermented feed of cauliflower residues could increase the average daily gain and final weight of lambs, promote the development of the rumen and small intestine of lambs, optimize the rumen flora structure of lambs, and promote the overall growth and development of lambs [17]. However, at present, there are few studies on the influence of the fermented feed of cauliflower tail vegetables on piglet diarrhea. Considering the widespread focus on the health of piglets and in light of public health concerns, numerous countries worldwide have prohibited the use of antibiotics as feed additives. Due to the advantages of fermentation feed, such as the minimal toxic side effects and low likelihood of antibiotic resistance, it holds great potential as a substitute for antibiotics to alleviate piglet weaning stress [18]. Therefore, this study aims to explore the effects of cauliflower residue fermented feed on the diarrhea rate, intestinal morphology, immune indicators, and gut microbiota of weaned piglets, providing a reference for the rational use and application of cauliflower residue fermented feed. The research results indicate that the fermented feed from cauliflower residue can improve the growth performance, apparent digestibility, and immune function of piglets, as well as reduce the diarrhea rate in piglets.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal Ethics Statement

This study has been approved by the Animal Protection and Use Committee of Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou, China (No: XBMU-SM-2020010).

2.2. Preparation of Cauliflower Residue Fermented Feed

Bacillus subtilis (CCTCC NO: 2021528), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (CICC NO: 1769), and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (CCTCC NO: M2021527) were sourced from the College of Life Science and Engineering at Northwest Minzu University. Cauliflower residues are composed of cauliflower leaves (harvested in November), provided by Lanzhou Ruiyuan Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. (Lanzhou, China). The preparation of the cauliflower residue fermentation feed concentrate involved uniformly mixing these microbial agents in a 1:1:1 mass ratio. The production process of fermented feed from cauliflower residue involves drying and grinding the cauliflower residue, then mixing it with other basic feed ingredients in proportion. Subsequently, 0.35% of a composite microbial agent is added, and the mixture is uniformly blended before being placed into fermentation bags [17]. After anaerobic fermentation at room temperature for 25 days, the fermented product is then dried in an oven to obtain the fermented feed. The nutritional needs of the pigs were based on the NRC (2012) guidelines. The composition and nutritional levels of the basic feed and the fermented feed made from cauliflower residue are detailed in Table 1.

2.3. Experimental Design

This study was conducted at the pig farm of Lanzhou Ruiyuan Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. (Lanzhou, China). The experiment utilized a completely randomized block design, selecting 42 weaned piglets (Duroc × [Landrace × Yorkshire], castrated male), with good health and similar weights (11.40 ± 1.36 kg) at 40 days of age, and randomly dividing them into two groups of 21 piglets each. There were 7 pens per treatment, each housing 3 pigs. The area of each pen was 120 cm × 80 cm (length × width), surrounded by stainless steel tubes, and equipped with a nipple water dispenser and a feed trough. Both groups of weaned piglets were subjected to consistent rearing and management conditions. The experiment lasted for 30 days, including an 8-day preliminary trial period followed by a 22-day formal trial period. During the adaptation period and feeding trials, all weaned piglets can freely obtain feed and water.
At the end of the experiment, 6 pigs close to the median body weight were selected from each group and euthanized. Each pig was intramuscularly injected with a dose of 80 mg/kg body weight of 10% pentobarbital sodium for anesthesia, and slaughtered 15 min later. The small intestine was taken from the abdominal cavity and divided into three parts according to physiological characteristics: the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum. A 2 cm segment was taken from each of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum, and the intestinal specimens were washed with physiological saline and stored in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h for morphological examination. The contents of the jejunum, ileum, cecum, and colon were collected in pre-chilled tubes and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until microbial composition analysis. The pH value of the intestinal contents was determined using a pH meter (NO.S400-B, Mettler Toledo Technology Co., Ltd., Changzhou, China). The contents were placed into a paper cup, the metal probe of the meter was completely immersed in the contents for 3 s, and the value was recorded after stabilization.
The growth trait data of piglets were measured according to our previous method, and the body shape index was calculated based on the measurement results [17]. Each body size index is calculated using the following formulas:
Body trunk index (%) = Chest girth/Body length × 100
Body length index (%) = Body length/Body height × 100
Chest girth index (%) = Chest girth/Body height × 100
Circumference index (%) = Circumference/Body height × 100

2.4. Apparent Digestibility Measurement

Before the end of the feeding trial, piglet feces were collected continuously for three days, twice a day, in the morning and afternoon, with each collection consisting of approximately 200 g. After collection, the fecal samples are immediately mixed with 10% H2SO4 (10 mL/100 g) for nitrogen fixation, labeled, and then stored at −20 °C for further use. All of the growing pigs’ excrement was defrosted, blended, and then dried at 65 °C for 72 h before the natural moisture was restored at room temperature for 24 h. The fecal samples were used to determine the content of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), crude fat, crude fiber (CF), total calcium, and total phosphorus. Acid-insoluble ash is used as an indigestible marker to measure the apparent total digestibility of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), crude fiber (CF), total calcium (Ca), and total phosphorus (P).
According to the method of J. Chen et al., the content of calcium and phosphorus mineral components in feces is detected [19]. Add 10 mL concentrated nitric acid and 1 mL hydrogen peroxide to digest the fecal sample in sequence. After boiling, add another 0.5 mL of perchloric acid and remove the acid at 180 °C for 2 h. Finally, use an Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometer (Agilent 5110 ICP-OES, Shanghai Shanfu Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) with 1% nitric acid and a constant volume of 10 mL to determine the content of calcium and phosphorus in the sample.
The apparent digestibility of nutrients is evaluated using the AIA method, and the apparent nutrient digestibility is calculated according to the following formula [20]. The calculation formula is shown below:
Nutrient retention ratio (%) = ((WFI × NF) − (WEV × NE) × 100)/(WFI × NF)
where: WFI = weight of feed intake; NF = concentration of nutrient in feed; WEV = weight of total excreta voided; NE = concentration of nutrient in total excreta.

2.5. The Determination of Digestive Enzyme Activity

According to the manufacturer (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Research Institute, Nanjing, China), the activity of enzymes in duodenal, jejunal, and ileal tissues was measured using α-amylase (NO. C016-1-1), lipase (NO. A054-1-1), trypsin (NO. A080-2-2), and chymotrypsin (NO. AO80-3-1) enzyme activity assay kits.

2.6. Diarrhea Scores

Evaluate the diarrhea rate of piglets according to the method outlined by Peng et al. [21]. During the experiment, the fecal condition of the piglets was observed daily, and sensory scoring was conducted for each instance of feces excreted by each piglet. The scoring system was applied to determine the rate of diarrhea as follows: 0 = hard feces; 1 = slightly soft feces; 2 = soft, partially formed feces; 3 = loose, semiliquid feces; 4 = watery, mucous-like feces. When the average score was over 2 for 2 consecutive days, pigs were identified as having diarrhea. The diarrhea rate was calculated according to the following equation:
Diarrhea rate (%) = the number of diarrhea piglets × diarrhea days/(the total number of piglets × experiment days) × 100
Diarrhea index = sum of piglet diarrhea scores during the experimental period/(number of piglets × number of experimental days)

2.7. Growth Performance

The growth performance was assessed by weighing the fasted weaned piglets at the beginning and end of the formal trial period, specifically on the first and last days, before morning feeding. The initial and final weights of the piglets were recorded, ensuring no significant differences in initial weights among the replicates. The average daily weight gain (ADG) was then calculated based on these initial and final weights. Throughout the trial, the feed consumption for each group was recorded on a daily basis per replicate, allowing for the calculation of the average daily feed intake (ADFI). Subsequently, the feed conversion ratio (Feed/Gain, F/G) was calculated based on ADG and ADFI.

2.8. H & E Stain

Evaluate the morphological characteristics of the intestinal tissues according to the methods outlined by Deng et al. [22]. The mid-duodenum, mid-jejunum, and mid-ileum sample tissue of the piglets was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 48 h to prepare a slice of 5 μm. Each intestinal tissue is sliced into six sections for observation. For morphological analysis, measure the villus height (V) and crypt depth (C) using image processing connected to an optical microscope. In each section, randomly select 5 different areas for observation and measurement. Calculate the V/C ratio to assess the relationship between villus height and crypt depth. At least 10 complete villi and associated crypt depths were measured for each tissue section in this study.

2.9. Serum Biochemical Indicators

At the conclusion of the experiment, 12 piglets were selected from each group for blood collection. Blood (10 mL) was drawn from the anterior vena cava and placed into sterile tubes (5 mL) or vacuum tubes containing heparin (5 mL). Non-anticoagulated samples were left at room temperature for 1 h and then centrifuged at 1500× g for 15 min (NO. AXTD530, Yancheng Anxin Technology Co., Ltd., Yancheng, China).
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was employed to determine the levels of immunoglobulins (Ig) in piglet serum, in accordance with the instructions provided with the respective reagent kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China). The detected immunological parameters encompassed IgA, IgG, and IgM.
We used an automated biochemical analyzer (Mindray BS-420, Shenzhen Mindray Bio Medical Electronics Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) to examine a range of serum parameters, including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin (Alb), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), triglycerides (TG), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total cholesterol (T-Chol), glucose (Glu), and total protein (TP). These were measured using the method detailed by Zhang et al., involving the centrifugation of serum samples at 2500× g at 4 °C [23].
The umbilical cord serum concentration of total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), urea, glucose (GLU), total cholesterol (TC), and total glyceride (TG) was examined using an automated biochemical analyzer (Mindray BS-420, Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China).

2.10. Microbiology of Cecal Contents

Microbial genomic DNA was extracted from cecal contents utilizing a QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen Ltd., Hilden, Germany). The V3-V4 region of the 16SrRNA gene underwent amplification with the universal primers F (5′-ACT CCT ACG GGA GGC AGC AG-3′) and R (5′-GGA CTA CHVGGG TWT CTAAT-3′). Purified amplicons were pooled in equimolar amounts and subjected to paired-end sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq PE300 platform/NovaSeq PE250 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the standard protocol of Majorbio Biopharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The Uslust algorithm was used to cluster operational taxa (OTU) with a confidence threshold of 0.7. The Shannon index, Chao 1 index, and ace index were used to analyze the α diversity.

2.11. Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed using the GraphPad Prism 8.0 program (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Differences between treatments were further assessed using Duncan’s range of comparison tests. The experimental data were expressed as the means ± SEM, and p < 0.05 between groups was considered as a statistically significant difference.

3. Results

3.1. Effect on Growth Performance of Weaned Piglets

According to Table 2, compared to the control group, the experimental group displayed a significant (p < 0.05) increase of 16.50% and 18.68% in the ADFI and ADG, respectively, for the weaned piglets. However, there were no statistically significant differences observed in the initial weight, final weight, and feed conversion ratio (p > 0.05). As shown in Table 3, compared to the control group, the apparent digestibility of DM, CP, total calcium, and total phosphorus in the experimental group piglets significantly increased by 4.67%, 3.97%, 2.54%, and 5.09% (p < 0.05); the difference in the apparent digestibility of CF in the experimental group was not significant (p > 0.05).
As shown in Table 4, the experimental group exhibited a significant (p < 0.05) increase of 12.82% and 17.50% in body length and chest width for the weaned piglets, respectively, compared to the control group. The experimental group showed slight increases in the body height, chest depth, pip circumference, and tube circumference indices, although, the differences were not deemed significant (p > 0.05). Additionally, the trunk indices, length indices, chest indices, and the chest did not exhibit any significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05).

3.2. Effect on Diarrhea of Weaned Piglets

According to Table 5, compared to the control group, the experimental group exhibited a significant (p < 0.05) decrease of 74.35% in the diarrhea rate and a significant decrease of 71.21% in the diarrhea index for the weaned piglets (p < 0.05).

3.3. Effect on Serum Biochemical Indices and Immunoglobulin Content of Weaned Piglets

As presented in Table 6, compared to the control group, the experimental group showed significant reductions of 29.43% in TC and 60.51% in ALT in the serum of the weaned piglets (p < 0.05). Additionally, UREA, ALB, and immunoglobulin M(IgM) significantly (p < 0.05) increased by 69.84%, 5.22%, and 100.00%, respectively. However, no significant differences were observed in the TP, CRE, GLU, GLB, AST, GGT, TG, and IgG (p > 0.05).

3.4. Effect on Intestinal Tissue Morphology of Weaned Piglets

Table 7 indicates that in comparison to the control group, the experimental group demonstrated a significant decrease of 9.56% in crypt depth in the jejunum of the weaned piglets (p < 0.05). Additionally, the villus height to crypt depth ratio (V/C ratio) and villus height in the ileum exhibited significant (p < 0.05) increases of 13.64% and 11.49%, respectively. However, no significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed in the villus height, crypt depth, and V/C ratio in the duodenum, villus height in the jejunum, and crypt depth and V/C ratio in the ileum when comparing the experimental group to the control group.

3.5. Effect on the pH of Weaned Piglets’ Intestinal Contents

As shown in Table 8, compared to the control group, the pH values of the duodenal and jejunal contents of piglets in the experimental group decreased by 19.16% and 11.59%, respectively (p < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in the pH values of the ileal contents between the two groups (p > 0.05).

3.6. Effect on Intestinal Digestive Enzyme Activities in Weaned Piglets

According to Table 9, compared to the control group, the experimental group exhibited a significant increase of 8.93% in trypsin activity in the duodenum of the weaned piglets (p < 0.05). Additionally, the activity of α-amylase and trypsin in the jejunum showed significant increases of 21.62% and 18.18%, respectively (p < 0.05). Moreover, there were substantial increases of 6.43%, 13.66%, and 79.85% in the activities of lipase, trypsin, and chymotrypsin in the ileum significantly, respectively (p < 0.05). However, no notable differences were discovered in the activities of α-amylase, lipase, and chymotrypsin in the duodenum, lipase, and chymotrypsin in the jejunum, and α-amylase in the ileum when comparing the experimental group to the control group (p > 0.05).

3.7. Microbiolota in Cecal Contents

According to Table 10, the Shannon index and Simpson index exhibited no significant differences between the experimental group and the control group (p > 0.05). However, the Chaol index and ACE index of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, the microbial community compositions of the experimental and control groups were distinctly separated, indicating significant differences in the microbial communities between them (Figure 1). The beta diversity analysis of Bray–Curtis dissimilarity at the observed genus level indicates that the microbial community of the experimental group differs from that of the control group (Figure 2).
At the phylum level, a total of 27 phyla were detected in the samples from both groups. The different colors in the graph represent various microbial groups, where the taller bars signify a higher proportion and relative abundance in the samples, and this pattern remains consistent at the level of class, order, and species. In Figure 3, the relatively abundant microbial phyla in the colonic contents of weaned piglets include Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Tenericutes, with Firmicutes and Proteobacteria being the dominant and subdominant phyla, respectively. Notably, the experimental group exhibited a significant increase in the relative abundance of Firmicutes and a decrease in the relative abundance of Proteobacteria, respectively, compared to the control group. Specifically, compared to the control group, the relative abundances of Lactobacillaceae and Bifidobacteriaceae increased significantly (p < 0.05) by 354.75% and 108.00%, respectively, while the relative abundances of Clostridiaceae_1, Streptococcaceae, and Peptostreptococcaceae decreased significantly (p < 0.05) by 66.00%, 85.17%, and 84.11%, respectively. The relative abundances of other microbial families showed no significant differences (p > 0.05).

4. Discussion

Early weaning can lead to piglet weaning stress syndrome, clinically manifested as growth retardation, weight loss, and severe diarrhea, ultimately resulting in decreased piglet constitution and reduced immunity, and making them more susceptible to secondary diseases from external pathogens such as bacteria or viruses [24]. Currently, this issue is mainly addressed by incorporating antibiotics to the feed. However, a large amount of data indicates that there is a phenomenon of excessive or prolonged addition of antibiotics during use, which is inevitably linked to the development of bacterial resistance and the presence of antibiotic residues in animal products [25]. This has prompted people to seek reliable and effective alternatives [26]. Fermented feed has many advantages, such as minimal toxic side effects and low antibiotic resistance, making it a promising alternative to antibiotics in alleviating weaning stress in piglets [27]. Therefore, this study comprehensively evaluated the application effects of cauliflower residue fermented feed on diarrheal piglets from aspects of growth performance, serum biochemical parameters, intestinal development, and microbial flora structure.
Growth performance is a core indicator for assessing the success of pig farm management, as increased growth leads to higher yields and greater economic benefits [28]. The results indicate that fermented feed can improve the growth performance of weaned piglets. In this experiment, the average daily weight gain (ADG) of the piglets in the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group, and the final weight also increased, indicating that fermented feed can significantly improve the growth performance of piglets. The apparent digestibility of nutrients directly impacts the growth performance of animals, which is positively correlated with their digestive performance, meaning that the higher the apparent digestibility of nutrients in the feed, the better the animals’ growth performance [29]. The results demonstrate that the digestibility of dry matter, crude protein, and total phosphorus significantly increased in the experimental group. This result indicates that fermented feed can improve piglets’ utilization of nutrients, thereby stimulating piglet growth. The body size index serves as a measure reflecting the interrelationships and proportions of various parts of livestock body development, providing insights into changes in the external characteristics of livestock and judging the extent of development across various parts [30]. In the results of this experiment, the experimental group exhibited notably higher body height and chest width than the control group, while other body size indicators and the body size index displayed no significant differences, indicating that feeding fermented feed did not adversely affect the development of various parts of the weaned piglets’ bodies, rather, it was conducive to the development of their body height and chest width.
The intestines are responsible for the digestion, absorption, and transportation of nutrients, and are the largest digestive organ in piglets [31]. They also serve as a crucial defense barrier in the animal body. Post-weaning diarrhea in piglets can damage the intestinal structure, leading to problems such as villous atrophy and increased crypt depth, which affect digestion, absorption, secretion, and barrier function [32]. In the results of this experiment, the villus height to crypt depth ratio (V/C) and the villus height in the jejunum of the post-weaning piglets in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group, while the crypt depth in the jejunum was significantly lower than that in the control group. This indicates that cauliflower residue fermented feed can promote the growth and development of the small intestine in post-weaning piglets, maintain the integrity of the intestinal mucosa, and thus improve the intestinal function of post-weaning piglets. The acidity of the digestive tract in livestock and poultry is an important factor influencing the digestive environment [32]. It is also the basis for regulating the acid-base balance and electrolyte balance within the intestines [33]. An appropriate level of acidity in the animal intestine ensures normal digestive function, making the intestinal pH value an important indicator of digestive performance. In this experiment, feeding fermented cauliflower residue feed significantly reduced the pH values of the duodenum and jejunum in piglets. This may be due to the colonization and growth of probiotics from the fermented feed in the intestines, leading to the production of a large amount of lactic acid, thereby reducing the pH value of the piglet intestines. The three main digestive enzymes in the digestive tract of livestock and poultry are amylase, lipase, and protease [34]. Increased activity of these digestive enzymes can improve the utilization of nutrients in the body. The activity of digestive enzymes in pig intestines directly affects feed utilization and piglet growth performance. The results of this study indicate that adding fermented feed to the diet significantly increases the pancreatic protease activity in the duodenum and jejunum, and significantly increases the activity of ileal lipase, pancreatic protease, and chymotrypsin.
Immunoglobulins play a crucial role in the protective barrier and are closely related to the animal’s immune system [35]. The strength of the body’s disease resistance can be indirectly reflected by the level of immunity [36]. The results of this experiment demonstrate that providing fermented feed leads to an increase in the serum IgG and IgM levels in weaned piglets, with IgM significantly higher than the control group, indicating that cauliflower residue fermented feed helps improve the immune capacity of weaned piglets. Serum albumin (ALB) and urea (UREA) are important indicators of the body’s metabolic function, especially nitrogen metabolism [37]. In this experiment, the levels of serum ALB and UREA in the experimental group were significantly increased, indicating that fermented cauliflower residue feed can promote the breakdown and metabolism of protein in the body, potentially promoting the growth and development of nursery pigs. The concentrations of total cholesterol (TC) and triglycerides (TG) in the serum are important indicators of the strength of lipid metabolism in the body [38]. The level of TG in the serum can determine the development of adipose tissue and the deposition of fat, with higher TG levels indicating more fat deposition [39]. In this experiment, the serum TC content in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group, indicating that fermented cauliflower residue feed has a regulatory effect on lipid metabolism. The health status of the liver and heart can be assessed by the activity of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) in the serum [40]. The lower the activity in the serum, the healthier the organ development [41]. In this experiment, the ALT in the experimental group was significantly reduced, indicating that feeding fermented cauliflower residue feed can protect the liver function of nursery pigs to a certain extent. The health status of the biliary system can be reflected by alkaline phosphatase (ALP), with higher ALP activity in the serum indicating better animal growth, and ALP activity increases with the increase in the daily weight gain of pigs [42]. In this experiment, the ALP in the serum of the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group, indicating that fermented cauliflower residue feed can increase the ALP activity in the serum of nursery pigs, thereby improving their growth performance.
The intestinal microbiota serves as a crucial symbiotic partner for the host, playing a pivotal role in intestinal metabolism. The pig’s intestinal microorganisms continuously colonize and establish a stable microbial ecosystem throughout the pig’s growth and development, contributing to the maintenance of the host’s health and normal physiological activities [43]. Alpha diversity refers to the diversity within a specific area or ecosystem, typically measured by metrics reflecting community richness [44]. This study indicates that adding fermented feed to the diet can increase the Chaol and ACE indices, reflecting enhanced microbial abundance in the gut of weaned piglets, and thus improving their resilience to unfavorable conditions. Therefore, fermented feed may favor the stability of the intestinal microbial community, aligning with its previously observed promotion of growth performance. Beta diversity reflects differences among different grouped samples and is often assessed using Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) to observe differences among individuals or populations [45]. The results of this study demonstrate that the microbial community structure of the six samples in the experimental group is notably similar and significantly different from that of the control group. This suggests that adding fermented feed to the diet of weaned piglets can significantly regulate their intestinal microbial community. In this study, the Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were identified as dominant microbial communities in the intestines of weaned piglets. Changes in the relative proportion of Firmicutes in the intestinal microbiota of piglets can lead to microbial imbalance, disrupted intestinal epithelial cell function, increased intestinal permeability, mucosal damage, immune response imbalance, and subsequently affect piglet growth performance [29]. At the phylum level, the experimental group exhibited a higher abundance of Firmicutes and Cyanobacteria compared to the control group. Conversely, the abundance of Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Tenericutes, and Fusobacteria was lower in the experimental group, along with a significantly reduced abundance of Bacteroidetes. Research indicates a close association between gut microbiota and obesity as well as host metabolic activities [46]. Various studies have found that increasing the abundance of Firmicutes, decreasing the abundance of Bacteroidetes, and reducing the ratio of Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes all contribute to promoting fattening [7,28]. At the genus level, the relative abundance of 336 species was annotated across the samples. The genus-level analysis suggests that feeding fermented feed significantly boosts the number of Lactobacillus, possibly related to the composite microbial agents added during the fermentation process. Additionally, it indirectly demonstrates that Lactobacillus can inhibit the proliferation of Streptococcus by significantly reducing its abundance. In conclusion, this research sheds light on the potential of fermented feed to modulate the gut microbiota of weaned piglets, highlighting its impact on their growth performance and intestinal microbial community structure.
In summary, the fermented feed of cauliflower residues significantly altered the diversity and community structure of the gut microbiota in diarrheal piglets, which may have profound effects on digestion and nutrient absorption. Further research is needed to explore the impact of these changes on the growth performance of piglets and to optimize the dosage and method of adding cauliflower residue fermented feed to achieve the best feeding effect. Although this study has certain limitations, the results still provide an effective method for preventing diarrhea in piglets. Future research should focus on the regulatory mechanisms of the metabolic products of cauliflower residue fermented feed on diarrheal piglets, identifying the specific molecules and cellular pathways involved. It is also important to explore the synergistic effects of cauliflower residue fermented feed with other intestinal health interventions to formulate more effective comprehensive prevention and treatment strategies.

5. Conclusions

Research shows that cauliflower residue fermented feed can foster the growth of weaned piglets, reduce the rate of diarrhea, regulate the content of TC, ALT, IgM, UREA, ALB, and other substances in the serum, increase the apparent digestibility of nutrients, and thus improve overall growth performance. In addition, cauliflower residue fermented feed can increase the villus height of the small intestine of weaned piglets, reduce crypt depth, regulate the acidity and alkalinity of the digestive tract, and increase the activity of intestinal digestive enzymes, thereby promoting intestinal development and balancing the digestion and absorption of nutrients. This feed can increase the species abundance and diversity of the microbial community in the cecum of weaned piglets. Furthermore, it promotes the proliferation of beneficial bacteria and reduces the number of harmful bacteria.

Author Contributions

R.Z. (Rongxin Zang) and R.Z. (Rui Zhao) contributed to the conception of this study and its design; H.W. contributed to the literature research and experimental studies; F.Y. helped to perform the analysis with constructive discussions; H.X. contributed to the editing and revision of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Enterprise horizontal scientific research project (FW2022128); the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Northwest Minzu University (31920230040 and 31920220026); research and development of special new technology (new equipment) for agricultural ecological environment protection in Gansu province (RWS-NYSTZZ202104).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study has been approved by the Animal Protection and Use Committee of Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou, China (No: XBMU-SM-2020010).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Raw data for the figures are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, M.; Yang, Z.Y.; Wu, G.F.; Xu, F.F.; Zhang, J.B.; Luo, X.; Ma, Y.H.; Pang, H.L.; Duan, Y.K.; Chen, J.; et al. Effects of Probiotic-Fermented Feed on the Growth Profile, Immune Functions, and Intestinal Microbiota of Bamei Piglets. Animals 2024, 14, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Homer, B.; Barekatain, R.; Petrovski, K.R.; Plush, K.J.; Dwan, C.; D’Souza, D.N.; Verma, P.J.; Kirkwood, R.N.; Tucker, B.S. Preweaning Purified Fucoidan Drench: Effects on Growth, Immune Response, and Intestinal Morphology in Weaned Piglets. Animals 2024, 14, 1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Liang, J.; Kou, S.S.; Chen, C.; Raza, S.H.A.; Wang, S.H.; Ma, X.; Zhang, W.J.; Nie, C.X. Effects of on growth performance, metabonomics and intestinal microbial differences of weaned piglets. BMC Microbiol. 2021, 21, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shuai, C.Y.; Chen, D.W.; Yu, B.; Luo, Y.H.; Zheng, P.; Huang, Z.Q.; Yu, J.; Mao, X.B.; Yan, H.; He, J. Effect of fermented rapeseed meal on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and intestinal health in growing pigs. Anim. Nutr. 2023, 15, 420–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhu, J.H.; Lu, Y.; Gao, Z.D.; Chong, Y.Q.; Li, M.F.; Deng, W.D.; Xi, D.M. Exploring the additive effect of Ampelopsis grossedentata flavonoids and Tween 80 on feeding Nubian goats. Front. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 1411071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yu, S.J.; Morris, A.; Kayal, A.; Milosevic, I.; Van, T.T.H.; Bajagai, Y.S.; Stanley, D. Pioneering gut health improvements in piglets with phytogenic feed additives. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2024, 108, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ruampatana, J.; Suwimonteerabutr, J.; Homyog, K.; Mekboonsonglarp, W.; Kanjanavaikoon, K.; Veken, W.V.D.; Poonyachoti, S.; Feyera, T.; Settachaimongkon, S.; Nuntapaitoon, M. Probiotic Feed Additive: Modulation of Sow Milk Metabolomics and Mitigation of Pre-Weaning Piglet Diarrhea. Animals 2024, 14, 2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Suvorov, A.; Zhao, S.; Leontieva, G.; Alekhina, G.; Yang, J.Y.; Tsapieva, A.; Karaseva, A.; Smelova, V.; Guo, D.Y.; Chen, L.L. Evaluation of the Efficacy of L3 as a Feed Probiotic Additive in Chicken. Probiotics Antimicro 2023, 15, 1169–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Compart, D.P.; Anele, U.; Engel, C.; Vyas, D.; Kim, D.; Hoppe, K. Impact of prebiotic and probiotic feed additive blends on bovine respiratory disease, E. coli O157:H7 shedding, and performance of receiving steers. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 96, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fan, L.; Liu, X.L.; Deng, Y.P.; Zheng, X.Q. Preparation of Glutamine-Enriched Fermented Feed from Corn Gluten Meal and Its Functionality Evaluation. Foods 2023, 12, 4336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, F.; Wu, H.Z.; Xie, J.J.; Zeng, T.; Hao, L.J.; Xu, W.W.; Lu, L.Z. The Effects of Fermented Feed on the Growth Performance, Antioxidant Activity, Immune Function, Intestinal Digestive Enzyme Activity, Morphology, and Microflora of Yellow-Feather Chickens. Animals 2023, 13, 3545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, S.; Xiao, H.; Xiong, Y.X.; Chen, J.P.; Wu, Q.W.; Wen, X.L.; Jiang, Z.Y.; Wang, L. Effects of Fermented Feed on the Growth Performance, Intestinal Function, and Microbiota of Piglets Weaned at Different Age. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 841762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Huang, Y.H.; Peng, Y.J.; Yang, Z.; Chen, S.Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, Z.; Wang, G.; Lan, S.L. Effects of Fermented Bamboo Shoot Processing Waste on Growth Performance, Serum Parameters, and Gut Microbiota of Weaned Piglets. Animals 2022, 12, 2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Momtaz, M.; Khan, M.S. Analysis of Chlorpyrifos Pesticide Residue in Locally Grown Cauliflower, Cabbage, and Eggplant Using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Technique: A Bangladesh Perspective. Foods 2024, 13, 1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Izadpanah, F.; Frede, K.; Soltani, F.; Baldermann, S. Comparison of carotenoid, chlorophyll concentrations and their biosynthetic transcript levels in different coloured cauliflower. Hortic. Plant J. 2024, 10, 743–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vijay, A.; Kalasariya, R.L.; Rathod, P.H.; Chawla, S.; Acharya, R.R. Dissipation and evaluation of different treatments on the residues of different insecticides in/on cauliflower curd. Food Addit. Contam. A 2024, 41, 385–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhou, R.; Wang, L.Y.; Li, Y.D.; Wu, H.H.; Lu, L.P.; Zang, R.X.; Xu, H.W. Effects of Tail Vegetable Fermented Feed on the Growth and Rumen Microbiota of Lambs. Animals 2024, 14, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, B.C.; Zhu, L.Y.; Fu, J.; Li, Z.; Wang, Y.Z.; Jin, M.L. Overall assessment of fermented feed for pigs: A series of meta-analyses. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 97, 4810–4821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chen, J.; Wu, G.F.; Pang, H.L.; Hua, J.Y.; Guan, Y.F.; Zhang, M.; Duan, Y.K.; Qin, G.Y.; Wang, L.; Cai, Y.M.; et al. Effect of Mixed- and -Fermented Feed on Growth, Immunity, and Intestinal Health of Weaner Pigs. Fermentation 2023, 9, 1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, H.J.; Lee, Y.S.; Weng, B.C.; Lin, C.Y.; Hsuuw, Y.D.; Chen, K.L. Two-Stage Fermented Feather Meal-Soybean Meal Product Improves the Performance and Immunity of Lactating Sows and Piglets. Fermentation 2023, 9, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Peng, S.Y.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, S.; Wang, H.Y.; Xu, C.; Wang, C.L. Effects of Tetrabasic Zinc Chloride on the Diarrhea Rate, Intestinal Morphology, Immune Indices and Microflora of Weaned Piglets. Animals 2024, 14, 737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Deng, Z.X.; Dai, J.Y.; Wei, Y.S.; Ma, Y.F.; Mao, Y.Y.; Zhang, J.Z.; Hua, W.D.; Wang, H.F. Comparison between GG and LuxS-deficient strain in regulating gut barrier function and inflammation in early-weaned piglets. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 1080789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, Y.Y.; Deng, Y.H.; Hao, Y.B.; Fang, J.M.; Feng, J. Effects of Supplementation with Oregano Essential Oil during Late Gestation and Lactation on Serum Metabolites, Antioxidant Capacity and Fecal Microbiota of Sows. Animals 2024, 14, 753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zheng, C.B.; Song, B.; Duan, Y.H.; Zhong, Y.Z.; Yan, Z.M.; Zhang, S.Y.; Li, F.N. Dietary β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate improves intestinal function in weaned piglets after lipopolysaccharide challenge. Nutrition 2020, 78, 110839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hu, S.L.; Wang, Y.; Wen, X.L.; Wang, L.; Jiang, Z.Y.; Zheng, C.T. Effects of low-molecular-weight chitosan on the growth performance, intestinal morphology, barrier function, cytokine expression and antioxidant system of weaned piglets. Bmc Vet. Res. 2018, 14, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sun, T.H.; Miao, H.B.; Zhang, C.B.; Wang, Y.S.; Liu, S.; Jiao, P.; Li, W.; Li, Y.; Huang, Z.X. Effect of dietary on the performance and intestinal microbiota of weaned piglets. Animal 2022, 16, 100561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, J.H.; Cao, F.L.; Su, E.Z.; Zhao, L.G.; Qin, W.S. Improvement of Animal Feed Additives of Ginkgo Leaves through Solid-state Fermentation using. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 14, 736–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ji, Y.; Fan, X.X.; Zhang, Y.C.; Li, J.; Dai, Z.L.; Wu, Z.L. Glycine regulates mucosal immunity and the intestinal microbial composition in weaned piglets. Amino Acids 2022, 54, 385–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, J.; Long, X.; Liao, Q.F.; Chai, J.; Zhang, T.H.; Chen, L.; He, H.; Yuan, Y.C.; Wan, K.; Wang, J.Y.; et al. Distinct Gut Microbiome Induced by Different Feeding Regimes in Weaned Piglets. Genes 2023, 14, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Park, S.; Song, J.; Park, M.A.; Jang, H.J.; Son, S.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, Y. Assessing the Probiotic Effects of CACC616 in Weaned Piglets. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fan, P.X.; Liu, P.; Song, P.X.; Chen, X.Y.; Ma, X. Moderate dietary protein restriction alters the composition of gut microbiota and improves ileal barrier function in adult pig model. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wu, Y.Y.; Cheng, B.; Ji, L.X.; Lv, X.Y.; Feng, Y.Y.; Li, L.A.; Wu, X. Dietary lysozyme improves growth performance and intestinal barrier function of weaned piglets. Anim. Nutr. 2023, 14, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wei, H.; Yang, M.; Jiang, X.M.; Hua, L.; Jin, C.; Wu, D.; Wang, Y.; Zhuo, Y. Effects of Gamma-Ray Irradiation of Bacteria Colonies in Animal Feeds and on Growth and Gut Health of Weaning Piglets. Animals 2023, 13, 3416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sanz-Fernández, S.; Díaz-Gaona, C.; Borge, C.; Quintanilla, R.; Rodríguez-Estévez, V. Multi-Criteria Evaluation Model of Management for Weaned Piglets and Its Relations with Farm Performance and Veterinary Medicine Consumption. Animals 2023, 13, 3508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lee, S.W.; Jung, C.M.; Do, K.H.; Lee, W.K.; Seo, K.W. Effects of Antimicrobial Administration Route on Growth and Antimicrobial Resistance in Weaned Piglets. Animals 2023, 13, 3264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, F.; Chen, M.X.; Liu, X.D.; Ji, X.; Li, S.H.; Jin, E.H. New insights into the unfolded protein response (UPR)-anterior gradient 2 (AGR2) pathway in the regulation of intestinal barrier function in weaned piglets. Anim. Nutr. 2023, 15, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, J.C.; Ma, X.Y.; Zhuo, Y.; Xu, S.Y.; Hua, L.; Li, J.; Feng, B.; Fang, Z.F.; Jiang, X.M.; Che, L.Q.; et al. The Effects of QST713 and β-mannanase on growth performance, intestinal barrier function, and the gut microbiota in weaned piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 2023, 101, skad257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Laviano, H.D.; Gomez, G.; Escudero, R.; Nuñez, Y.; García-Casco, J.M.; Muñoz, M.; Heras-Molina, A.; López-Bote, C.; González-Bulnes, A.; Ovilo, C.; et al. Maternal Supplementation of Vitamin E or Its Combination with Hydroxytyrosol Increases the Gut Health and Short Chain Fatty Acids of Piglets at Weaning. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pastorelli, G.; Benamri, R.; Faustini, M.; De Bellis, R.; Serra, V.; Turin, L.; Haumont, M.; Durand, P.; Bianchessi, L.; Prost-Camus, E.; et al. Partial Replacement of Synthetic Vitamin E by Polyphenols in Post-Weaning Piglets. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Van Kerschaver, C.; Vandaele, M.; Van Tichelen, K.; van de Putte, T.; Fremaut, D.; Van Ginneken, C.; Michiels, J.; Degroote, J. Effect of co-mingling non-littermates during lactation and feed familiarity at weaning on the performance, skin lesions and health of piglet. Livest. Sci. 2023, 277, 105344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wei, K.; Yang, X.; Zhao, H.S.; Chen, H.C.; Bei, W.C. Effects of combined application of benzoic acid and 1-monolaurin on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, gut microbiome and inflammatory factor levels in weaned piglets. Porc. Health Manag. 2023, 9, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Szczepanik, K.; Oczkowicz, M.; Dobrowolski, P.; Swiatkiewicz, M. The Protective Effects of Astaxanthin (AST) in the Liver of Weaned Piglets. Animals 2023, 13, 3268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Correa, F.; Luise, D.; Palladino, G.; Scicchitano, D.; Brigidi, P.; Martelli, P.L.; Babbi, G.; Turroni, S.; Litta, G.; Candela, M.; et al. Influence of body lesion severity on oxidative status and gut microbiota of weaned pigs. Animal 2023, 17, 100818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yu, J.F.; Cao, Y.; Xie, J.; Kang, R.M.; Wei, Y.; Ye, Y.G.; Liao, D.J.; Li, X.L.; Lin, Y.; Dai, Z.J.; et al. Zinc influences innate and adaptive immune responses in mice with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli-induced diarrhea. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2018, 11, 9248–9255. [Google Scholar]
  45. Yu, F.Z.; Hu, X.Y.; Ren, H.L.; Wang, X.X.; Shi, R.R.; Guo, J.; Chang, J.; Zhou, X.S.; Jin, Y.Y.; Li, Y.S.; et al. Protective effect of synbiotic combination of and olive oil extract tyrosol in a murine model of ulcerative colitis. J. Transl. Med. 2024, 22, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jiao, S.; Zheng, Z.H.; Zhuang, Y.M.; Tang, C.L.; Zhang, N.F. Dietary medium-chain fatty acid and Bacillus in combination alleviate weaning stress of piglets by regulating intestinal microbiota and barrier function. J. Anim. Sci. 2023, 101, skac414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Species abundance PCoA analysis diagrams of horizontal Bray–Curtis algorithms.
Figure 1. Species abundance PCoA analysis diagrams of horizontal Bray–Curtis algorithms.
Fermentation 10 00465 g001
Figure 2. The abundance of intestinal microbiota at phylum levels of piglets.
Figure 2. The abundance of intestinal microbiota at phylum levels of piglets.
Fermentation 10 00465 g002
Figure 3. The abundance of intestinal microbiota at genus levels of piglets.
Figure 3. The abundance of intestinal microbiota at genus levels of piglets.
Fermentation 10 00465 g003
Table 1. Composition and nutrient levels of diets (air-dry basis).
Table 1. Composition and nutrient levels of diets (air-dry basis).
ItemTreatments
IngredientsControlExperimental
Corn (%)57.0050.00
Cauliflower residue fermented feed (%)20.00
Soybean meal (%)30.0022.00
Rice bran (%)10.005.00
CaHPO4 (%)2.202.20
Premix (1) (%)0.500.50
NaCl (%)0.300.30
Nutrient levels
DE (MJ/kg)8.768.85
Crude protein (%)19.0020.56
Crude fiber (%)5.0010.00
Ash (%)7.007.80
Ca (%)1.001.14
Total phosphorus (%)0.430.44
Lys1.300.96
Met0.280.32
Note: (1) The premix provided the following per kg of the diet: VA 120,000 IU, VD 16,000 IU, VE 440 IU, Fe 2000 mg, Cu 640 mg, Zn 1600 mg, Mn 320 mg, I 9.6 mg, Se 4 mg. DE was a calculated value, while the others were measured values.
Table 2. Effects of cauliflower residue fermented feed on growth performance of weaned piglets.
Table 2. Effects of cauliflower residue fermented feed on growth performance of weaned piglets.
ItemTreatments CV 2 SEM 1p-Value
ControlExperimentalControlExperimental
Initial weight (kg)11.26 ± 0.2511.55 ± 0.342.222.940.400.546
Final weight (kg)23.88 ± 0.4825.87 ± 0.632.012.431.710.063
Average daily gain, g/d553.33 ± 26.03 b656.67 ± 21.86 a4.703.3218.720.023
Average daily feedintake, g/d1030 ± 20 b1200 ± 90 a1.947.5120.520.048
Feed conversion ratio2.28 ± 0.221.81 ± 0.119.646.070.230.072
Feed conversion ratio = average daily feed intake/average daily gain. 1 SEM, standard error of the mean (n = 11). The means were analyzed using Student’s t test (p < 0.05). 2 CV, Coefficient of Variation = (Standard deviation SD/Mean) × 100%. a,b Different superscript letters in each indicator represent a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Effects of cauliflower residue fermented feed on nutrient apparent digestibility of weaned piglets.
Table 3. Effects of cauliflower residue fermented feed on nutrient apparent digestibility of weaned piglets.
ItemTreatments CV 2 SEM 1p-Value
ControlExperimentalControlExperimental
DM (%)83.45 ± 0.44 b87.35 ± 0.47 a1.020.560.4780.044
Crude fat (%)57.91 ± 2.4758.62 ± 1.804.263.070.5490.321
Crude protein (%)83.11 ± 1.06 b86.41 ± 0.35 a1.270.450.5730.042
Crude fiber (%)60.61 ± 1.1964.33 ± 0.671.981.040.2160.069
Total calcium (%)63.38 ± 0.18 b64.99 ± 0.34 a0.540.490.0250.046
Total phosphorus (%)60.85 ± 0.24 b63.95 ± 0.08 a0.420.290.0570.032
1 SEM, standard error of the mean (n = 11). The means were analyzed using Student’s t test (p < 0.05). 2 CV, Coefficient of Variation = (Standard deviation SD/Mean) × 100%. a,b Different superscript letters in each indicator represent a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Effects of cauliflower residue fermented feed on piglet’s body size.
Table 4. Effects of cauliflower residue fermented feed on piglet’s body size.
ItemTreatments CV 2 SEM 1p-Value
ControlExperimentalControlExperimental
Body height/cm52.16 ± 0.7559.33 ± 3.681.446.205.560.241
Body length/cm37.67 ± 1.15 b42.50 ± 0.56 a1.321.325.650.026
The chest/cm64.00 ± 1.8668.83 ± 1.902.902.761.780.642
Chest width/cm16.17 ± 0.48 b19.00 ± 1.06 a2.975.592.560.043
Chest depth/cm20.67 ± 0.7123.00 ± 1.637.087.080.870.207
Pip circumference/cm16.50 ± 0.9217.50 ± 0.925.265.262.860.212
Trunk indices/%122.73 ± 3.40118.02 ± 7.546.396.392.440.406
Length indices/%138.96 ± 3.49139.88 ± 9.376.776.701.570.634
Chest indices/%169.99 ± 1.64162.25 ± 5.823.623.584.450.323
Tube circumference indices/%36.67 ± 1.1833.02 ± 1.653.225.021.460.055
1 SEM, standard error of the mean (n = 11). The means were analyzed using Student’s t test (p < 0.05). 2 CV, Coefficient of Variation = (Standard deviation SD/Mean) × 100%. a,b Different superscript letters in each indicator represent a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Table 5. Effects of cauliflower residue fermented feed on controlling diarrhea of weaned piglets.
Table 5. Effects of cauliflower residue fermented feed on controlling diarrhea of weaned piglets.
ItemTreatments CV 2 SEM 1p-Value
ControlExperimentalControlExperimental
Diarrhea rate (%)32.90 ± 2.84 a8.44 ± 2.09 b8.6324.759.3260.032
Diarrhea indices0.66 ± 0.07 a0.19 ± 0.04 b1.0621.060.2650.016
1 SEM, standard error of the mean (n = 11). The means were analyzed using Student’s t test (p < 0.05). 2 CV, Coefficient of Variation = (Standard deviation SD/Mean) × 100%. a,b Different superscript letters in each indicator represent a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Table 6. Effects of cauliflower residue fermented feed on serum biochemical indices and immunoglobulin content of weaned piglets.
Table 6. Effects of cauliflower residue fermented feed on serum biochemical indices and immunoglobulin content of weaned piglets.
ItemTreatments 1 SEM 1p-Value
ControlExperimental
TP (g/L)63.60 ± 1.4665.97 ± 2.110.3530.067
ALB (g/L)38.98 ± 1.49 b34.90 ± 1.20 a0.3260.045
CRE (mmol/L)91.33 ± 3.9180.00 ± 5.091.4540.052
UREA (mmol/L)3.68 ± 0.35 b6.25 ± 0.37 a0.2450.027
GLU (mmol/L)7.45 ± 0.536.55 ± 0.460.4150.071
GLB(U/L)30.32 ± 0.7231.27 ± 2.640.3150.063
AST (U/L)47.60 ± 6.3743.00 ± 6.710.4650.152
GGT (U/L)51.17 ± 5.6151.17 ± 7.210.1650.074
TG (mmol/L)0.71 ± 0.100.56 ± 0.040.0540.056
TC (mmol/L)3.33 ± 0.26 a2.35 ± 0.20 b0.2540.037
ALT (U/L)92.00 ± 5.81 a36.33 ± 2.72 b6.4780.024
IgG (g/L)3.80 ± 0.424.38 ± 0.300.6240.067
IgM (g/L)0.57 ± 0.05 b1.14 ± 0.08 a0.1240.015
1 SEM, standard error of the mean (n = 6). The means were analyzed using Student’s t test (p < 0.05). a,b Different superscript letters in each indicator represent a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Table 7. Effect of cauliflower residue fermented feed on intestinal morphology of weaned piglets.
Table 7. Effect of cauliflower residue fermented feed on intestinal morphology of weaned piglets.
ItemTreatments SEM 1p-Value
ControlExperimental
Villus height (V)
Duodenum, mm744.98 ± 19.26769.14 ± 23.962.0450.074
Jejunum, mm627.90 ± 26.07648.08 ± 14.493.0780.076
Ileum, mm599.44 ± 23.16 b668.33 ± 15.24 a0.4680.045
Crypt depth (C)
Duodenum, mm493.77 ± 17.21477.37 ± 15.450.8140.062
Jejunum, mm415.39 ± 15.59 a375.69 ± 9.27 b0.0540.032
Ileum, mm376.54 ± 18.69407.48 ± 16.560.7850.065
V: C ratio
Duodenum, mm/mm1.56 ± 0.071.63 ± 0.040.6950.092
Jejunum, mm1.54 ± 0.07 b1.75 ± 0.04 a0.4780.041
Ileum, mm1.70 ± 0.101.72 ± 0.080.8960.095
1 SEM, standard error of the mean (n = 6). The means were analyzed using Student’s t test (p < 0.05). a,b Different superscript letters in each indicator represent a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Table 8. Effects of cauliflower residue fermented feed on pH of intestinal contents of weaned piglets.
Table 8. Effects of cauliflower residue fermented feed on pH of intestinal contents of weaned piglets.
ItemTreatments SEM 1p-Value
ControlExperimental
Duodenum6.89 ± 0.15 a5.57 ± 0.23 b0.4560.032
Jejunum7.16 ± 0.14 a6.33 ± 0.19 b0.5650.016
Ileum7.80 ± 0.226.96 ± 0.340.5340.072
1 SEM, standard error of the mean (n = 6). The means were analyzed using Student’s t test (p < 0.05). a,b Different superscript letters in each indicator represent a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Table 9. Effects of cauliflower residue fermented feed on intestinal digestive enzyme activities of weaned piglets.
Table 9. Effects of cauliflower residue fermented feed on intestinal digestive enzyme activities of weaned piglets.
ItemTreatments SEM 1p-Value
ControlExperimental
α-Amylase(U/mg)
Duodenum, mm4.24 ± 0.665.32 ± 0.210.3150.086
Jejunum, mm4.07 ± 0.09 b4.95 ± 0.30 a0.0460.041
Ileum, mm2.49 ± 0.243.19 ± 0.130.2410.069
Lipase (U/g)
Duodenum, mm102.82 ± 3.73110.57 ± 0.440.8140.071
Jejunum, mm90.86 ± 1.4492.06 ± 3.200.7510.101
Ileum, mm64.25 ± 1.13 b68.38 ± 0.60 a0.3290.041
Trypsin (U/mg)
Duodenum, mm1062.06 ± 23.14 b1156.85 ± 20.51 a5.6950.042
Jejunum, mm782.07 ± 27.78 b924.25 ± 19.00 a4.4780.034
Ileum, mm549.57 ± 3.47 b624.66 ± 17.07 a7.8960.031
Chymotrypsin (U/mg)
Duodenum, mm2.22 ± 0.012.88 ± 0.200.2030.076
Jejunum, mm2.09 ± 0.022.62 ± 0.200.1650.069
Ileum, mm1.34 ± 0.21 b2.41 ± 0.26 a0.2950.022
1 SEM, standard error of the mean (n = 6). The means were analyzed using Student’s t test (p < 0.05). a,b Different superscript letters in each indicator represent a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Table 10. The Alpha diversity of cecum communities in two groups of weaned piglets.
Table 10. The Alpha diversity of cecum communities in two groups of weaned piglets.
ItemTreatments SEM 1p-Value
ControlExperimental
ACE index763.81 ± 115.68 a804.59 ± 61.13 b0.4560.032
Chaol index643.67 ± 111.38 a776.84 ± 76.14 b0.5650.016
Shannon index2.57 ± 0.432.75 ± 0.190.2340.072
Simpson index0.29 ± 0.080.22 ± 0.100.0050.056
1 SEM, standard error of the mean (n = 6). The means were analyzed using Student’s t test (p < 0.05). a,b Different superscript letters in each indicator represent a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, H.; Wu, H.; Zhou, R.; Yu, F.; Zang, R. The Effects of Fermented Cauliflower Residue Feed on the Diarrhea Rate, Intestinal Morphology, Immune Indicators, and Intestinal Flora of Weaned Piglets. Fermentation 2024, 10, 465. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10090465

AMA Style

Xu H, Wu H, Zhou R, Yu F, Zang R. The Effects of Fermented Cauliflower Residue Feed on the Diarrhea Rate, Intestinal Morphology, Immune Indicators, and Intestinal Flora of Weaned Piglets. Fermentation. 2024; 10(9):465. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10090465

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Hongwei, Huihao Wu, Rui Zhou, Fazheng Yu, and Rongxin Zang. 2024. "The Effects of Fermented Cauliflower Residue Feed on the Diarrhea Rate, Intestinal Morphology, Immune Indicators, and Intestinal Flora of Weaned Piglets" Fermentation 10, no. 9: 465. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10090465

APA Style

Xu, H., Wu, H., Zhou, R., Yu, F., & Zang, R. (2024). The Effects of Fermented Cauliflower Residue Feed on the Diarrhea Rate, Intestinal Morphology, Immune Indicators, and Intestinal Flora of Weaned Piglets. Fermentation, 10(9), 465. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10090465

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop