Next Article in Journal
Influence of Molasses and Caesalpinia spinosa Meal Inoculums on Biogas Production from Cattle Manure
Previous Article in Journal
Efficient Biosynthesis of Ectoine in Recombinant Escherichia coli by Biobrick Method
Previous Article in Special Issue
Strategies for Recovery, Purification and Quantification of Torularhodin Produced by Rhodotorula mucilaginosa Using Different Carbon Sources
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Yeast for the Production of Biochemicals and Biofuels

Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Sec-125, Noida 201313, Uttar Pradesh, India
Fermentation 2024, 10(9), 451; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10090451
Submission received: 17 August 2024 / Accepted: 29 August 2024 / Published: 30 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Yeast for the Production of Biochemicals and Biofuels)
Demands for bioenergy resources, nutraceuticals, biofertilizers, and other industrially important chemicals have escalated globally due to rapid urbanization, industrialization, and a growing awareness about bio-based, environment-friendly products [1,2,3]. Microbial cell factories, especially yeast strains, have attracted researchers and industrialists to synthesize natural products, e.g., pigments, chemicals, enzymes, biofuels, etc., because of their ability to utilize inexpensive waste feedstock as nitrogen and energy sources, thereby mitigating the concerns of waste management with simultaneous revenue generation [1]. Wild yeast strains have the innate quality of naturally decomposing complex organic matter into easily assimilable molecules, making them cultivable on agro-industrial waste hydrolysates via optimized bioprocessing [1,4]. Prior knowledge of the organisms’ nutritional requirements, fermentation conditions, and the underlying cellular biosynthetic pathways has led to the enhanced production of valuable commodities with desired properties [5,6]. This Special Issue is focused on the use of various yeast and fungal strains for the synthesis of various biochemicals and biofuels that are lucrative to industry (in energy, healthcare, cosmetics, the food sector, etc.) and the health-conscious population, who prefer bio-based products above chemically synthesized alternatives (Figure 1). Seven articles were published in this issue that highlight the sustainable and environment-friendly production of various yeast-based commodities.
The first and third research articles (chronological order) focus on the use of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for 2,3-butanediol (BD) production, and the fourth on γ-bisabolene production from S. cerevisiae using various strategies. Liu et al. (contribution 1) show that the addition of exogenous short-chain fatty acids, acetic acid, and dissolved oxygen impacted the BD production from S. cerevisiae W141. Their optimized results for the 3.25 ± 0.03 g/L BD yield involved the use of 4.52 mg/L dissolved oxygen and 1.0 g/L acetic acid, ascertaining that the bioprocess was industrially feasible and sustainable. Ao et al. (contribution 2) demonstrate a 3.12-fold enhancement in BD production by cultivating S. cerevisiae L7 by employing the Plackett–Burman multifactorial design combined with a central composite design. Fedbatch fermentation using glucose and acetic acid feed was proven to elevate BD yield, and the results provide strong support for large-scale BD production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
The fourth article describes γ-bisabolene production, which is an approved food additive and may be considered as a substitute for D2 diesel in the hydrogenated state. A new γ-bisabolene synthase was identified in this strain and expressed in peroxisomes along with the mevalonate pathway to achieve a γ-bisabolene titer of 125.0 mg/L (contribution 3). Furthermore, the peroxisome autophagy gene was deleted, the squalene synthase expression was decreased, and acetyl-CoA supply was elevated to obtain maximal γ-bisabolene production at 584.14 mg/L (shake-flask) and 2.69 g/L (fed-batch), being the highest record known to date. The second article in the series also demonstrated the significance of genetic engineering strategy for using yeast or fungal strains for production of important healthcare products that can provide a strong foundation to industry for sustainable large-scale production (contribution 4).
The fifth article (contribution 5) discusses the use of different carbon sources to produce torularhodin from oleaginous red yeast Rhodosporidium mucilaginosa using an optimized extraction strategy involving treatment with acid, bases, enzymes, along with heat and ultrasound. The heat and acid combination were considered most suitable for extracting the torularhodin pigment, which was purified using a silica cartridge and eluted with a mixture of methanol–hexane–acetone in a ratio of 2:1:2, and its absorption coefficient (E1%1cm) was determined as 3342 in chloroform. The authors demonstrate that various carbon sources influenced the carotenoids content and constituents in this yeast, although torularhodin was still the dominant pigment.
The research topic also includes two interesting review articles on yeast-mediated bioenergy production along with waste valorization (contributions 6–7). The review article by Zhang et al. (contribution 7) focuses on the challenges and opportunities of bioethanol production, whereas Ahuja et al. (contribution 6) highlights the use of yeast for the production of biodiesel, bioethanol, and biogas. The reviews emphasize the need for advanced or integrated technologies to address the current global energy demands by employing waste feedstock for a net zero emission target and to achieve a circular economy, as also solicited by experts [3,7,8].
All the articles in this research article have unanimously vouched for using wild-type or engineered yeast strains for environmentally friendly, cost-effective, and sustainable production of biochemicals and biofuels via optimized bioprocessing strategies.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Liu, J.; Sun, S.; Sun, Y.; Liu, D.; Kang, J.; Ye, Z.; Song, G.; Ge, J. Effect of Short-Chain Fatty Acids on the Yield of 2,3-Butanediol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae W141: The Synergistic Effect of Acetic Acid and Dissolved Oxygen. Fermentation 2023, 9, 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9030236.
  • Ao, G.; Sun, S.; Liu, L.; Guo, Y.; Tu, X.; Ge, J.; Ping, W. Production of 2,3-Butanediol by S. cerevisiae L7 in Fed-Batch Fermentation with Optimized Culture Conditions. Fermentation 2023, 9, 694. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9070694.
  • Liu, J.; Yao, G.; Wan, X.; Wang, F.; Han, P.; Bao, S.; Wang, K.; Song, T.; Jiang, H. Highly Efficient Biosynthesis of γ-Bisabolene with a New Sesquiterpene Synthase AcTPS5 by Dual Cytoplasmic-Peroxisomal Engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Fermentation 2023, 9, 779. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9090779.
  • Chen, J.; Gui, L.; Chen, B.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Lu, F.; Li, M. Improving Expression of Pepsinogen A from Homo sapiens in Aspergillus niger by Using a Multi-Copy Gene Knock-in Strategy. Fermentation 2023, 9, 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9060538.
  • Zeng, Y.; Wang, R.; Liang, J.; Zhang, H.; Yi, J.; Liu, Z. Strategies for Recovery, Purification and Quantification of Torularhodin Produced by Rhodotorula mucilaginosa Using Different Carbon Sources. Fermentation 2023, 9, 846. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9090846.
  • Ahuja, V.; Arora, A.; Chauhan, S.; Thakur, S.; Jeyaseelan, C.; Paul, D. Yeast-Mediated Biomass Valorization for Biofuel Production: A Literature Review. Fermentation 2023, 9, 784. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9090784.
  • Zhang, H.; Zhang, P.; Wu, T.; Ruan, H. Bioethanol Production Based on Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Opportunities and Challenges. Fermentation 2023, 9, 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9080709.

References

  1. Paul, D.; Bohacz, J.; Bhatia, S.K. Editorial: Biowaste valorization utilizing microbial systems. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1213598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yaashikaa, P.R.; Kumar, P.; Varjani, S. Valorization of agro-industrial wastes for biorefinery process and circular bioeconomy: A critical review. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 343, 126126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Aidonojie, P.A.; Ukhurebor, K.E.; Oaihimire, I.E.; Ngonso, B.F.; Egielewa, P.E.; Akinsehinde, B.O.; Kusuma, H.S.; Darmokoesoemo, H. Bioenergy revamping and complimenting the global environmental legal framework on the reduction of waste materials: A facile review. Heliyon 2023, 6, e12860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Parasar, D.P.; Ramakrishnan, E.; Kabilan, S.; Kotoky, J.; Sarma, H.K. Characterization of β-cryptoxanthin and other carotenoid derivatives from Rhodotorula taiwanensis, a novel yeast isolated from traditional starter culture of Assam. Chem. Biodivers. 2020, 17, e2000198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sokolova, N.; Peng, B.; Haslinger, K. Design and engineering of artificial biosynthetic pathways-where do we stand and where do we go? FEBS Lett. 2023, 597, 2897–2907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lu, H.; Chen, H.; Tang, X.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Y.Q.; Chen, W. Metabolomics analysis reveals the role of oxygen control in the nitrogen limitation induced lipid accumulation in Mortierella alpina. J. Biotechnol. 2021, 325, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Magdouli, S.; Guedri, T.; Tarek, R.; Brar, S.K.; Blais, J.F. Valorization of raw glycerol and crustacean waste into value added products by Yarrowia lipolytica. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 243, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Deeba, F.; Kiran Kumar, K.; Ali Wani, S.; Singh, A.; Sharma, J.; Gaur, N.A. Enhanced biodiesel and β-carotene production in Rhodotorula pacifica INDKK using sugarcane bagasse and molasses by an integrated biorefinery framework. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 351, 127067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Sustainable production of bioenergy and other valuable products from yeast and fungal strains. The biorefinery model used ensures an environment friendly approach and a good return on investment.
Figure 1. Sustainable production of bioenergy and other valuable products from yeast and fungal strains. The biorefinery model used ensures an environment friendly approach and a good return on investment.
Fermentation 10 00451 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Paul, D. Yeast for the Production of Biochemicals and Biofuels. Fermentation 2024, 10, 451. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10090451

AMA Style

Paul D. Yeast for the Production of Biochemicals and Biofuels. Fermentation. 2024; 10(9):451. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10090451

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paul, Debarati. 2024. "Yeast for the Production of Biochemicals and Biofuels" Fermentation 10, no. 9: 451. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10090451

APA Style

Paul, D. (2024). Yeast for the Production of Biochemicals and Biofuels. Fermentation, 10(9), 451. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10090451

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop