Next Article in Journal
Acidogenic Fermentation of Food Waste for the Production of Short-Chain Fatty Acids: The Impact of Inoculum Type and Inoculum Heat Pretreatment
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancement of Anaerobic Digestion of Corn Straw: Effect of Biological Pretreatment and Heating with Bio-Heat Recovery from Pretreatment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Fermentation
Volume 10
Issue 3
10.3390/fermentation10030161
fermentation-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation for Isobutanol Production from Banana Peel

by
Hironaga Akita
*,
Shodai Shibata
,
Tomoe Komoriya
,
Shinnosuke Kamei
,
Hiromichi Asamoto
and
Masakazu Matsumoto
College of Industrial Technology, Nihon University, 1-2-1 Izumi-cho, Narashino 275-8575, Chiba, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2024, 10(3), 161; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10030161
Submission received: 31 January 2024 / Revised: 22 February 2024 / Accepted: 4 March 2024 / Published: 12 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioconversion of Biomass for Effective Production of Biofuels as Well as Biobased Chemicals and Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Each year, near 40 million tons of banana peels are discarded around the world. This plant biomass could potentially be utilized for energy production. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) is an effective method for producing biofuels from plant biomasses. Since SSF with enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation are performed simultaneously in the same reactor, the production process is simpler than most existing methods. Here, we describe isobutanol production using SSF with hydrothermally treated banana peel samples and an Escherichia coli strain able to utilize glucose and xylose to produce isobutanol. To enhance the glucose and xylose concentrations, the reaction conditions for the enzymatic hydrolysis of plant biomass using two kinds of saccharification enzymes were optimized, including the enzyme unit ratio, reaction temperature and sample gram. When the optimized conditions for enzymatic hydrolysis were applied to SSF, the glucose and xylose produced from the hydrothermally treated samples were consumed, producing isobutanol. Moreover, the isobutanol concentration increased with an increasing initial culture pH, reaching 1.27 g/L at pH 6.5, which was consistent with the optimal initial culture pH for isobutanol production by this E. coli strain. Taken together, these results indicate that the established method is potentially useful for industrial isobutanol production.

1. Introduction

Fossil fuel is currently the most used energy source in the world, and its consumption is increasing because of economic growth and with increasing population [1]. However, the supply of fossil fuels is finite, and its future depletion is inevitable. Moreover, the increased fossil fuel consumption is causing environmental problems such as global warming and air pollution. Global warming, in particular, has been progressing with the increase in greenhouse gas emissions since the Industrial Revolution, and some geographical areas are already under threat from extreme weather events. Polar ice is melting, caused by rising air and seawater temperatures due to global warming. Three-quarters of the Arctic ice has already melted in the past 40 years, leading to rising sea levels [2]. Moreover, if sea-level rise continues until 2100, it is estimated that more than several thousand locations will be flooded, mainly along the coasts of Asia and Equatorial regions [3]. It is known that a rising temperature due to global warming evaporates soil moisture, causing surface dryness and drought. These dry conditions make wildfires more likely to occur and the damage more serious. For example, wildfires of unprecedented scale have occurred around the world in the past few years. In 2020, wildfires burned 2.7 million hectares on the west coast of the United States, forcing tens of thousands of people from their homes [4]. Also, similar wildfires occurred in British Columbia, Canada, in 2017 and 2018; in the Amazon rainforest of Brazil in 2019 and 2020; and in central Queensland, Australia, in 2019 and 2020 [4]. Moreover, in Mediterranean Europe, wildfires burn an average of approximately 4500 km2 each year [5]. In addition to extreme weather events, as mentioned above, tropical storms, floods, extreme heat waves, and cold winter storms are also caused by global warming [6], which leads to ecological imbalance. A report released by the United Nations, in 2020, estimates that more than 1 million species will become endangered in the coming few decades [7]. Therefore, to advance toward a sustainable society, it will be necessary to develop new energy sources that are efficient, renewable and environmentally friendly to replace fossil fuels. One such approach that is being studied around the world is the utilization of plant biomass to produce biofuel. Plants absorb carbon dioxide during photosynthesis for growth, and the amount of carbon dioxide emitted during the combustion of plant biomass is the same as the amount of carbon dioxide previously absorbed for growth. This makes plant biomass a carbon-neutral renewable energy source [1].
Bananas are herbaceous flowering plants widely cultivated in humid tropical and subtropical countries. Since ripe bananas are nutritious and highly digestible, this fruit can be eaten raw, and a variety of snacks, food dyes and insecticides are produced from bananas [8]. On the other hand, unripe bananas are not tasty and are used to produce banana flour. More than 114 million tons of bananas are produced worldwide each year. Notably, banana peels account for about one-third of the fruit’s weight, and approximately 39.9 million tons of banana peels are discarded as food waste each year [8]. However, because banana peels contain approximately 50% polysaccharide and 10% protein (Table S1, see Supplementary Data), they can be effectively used as a medium component to cultivate microorganisms [9,10].
The utilization of plant biomass as a source of biofuel entails a multistep process that includes hydrothermal pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation [11]. In the hydrothermal pretreatment step, powder prepared from plant biomass is hydrothermally treated to break down the tissue into cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. In the subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis step, the hydrothermally treated samples are treated with several enzymes, including cellulases and hemicellulases, which hydrolyze the cellulose and hemicellulose to produce primarily glucose and xylose. Finally, the hydrolysate is used by microorganisms as a carbon source during fermentation. With this process, biofuels, such as 2,3-butanediol [12], ethanol [13] and isobutanol [14], are being produced by wild-type or genetically engineered microorganisms. However, a number of challenges remain, including the need to reduce production costs, which have made it difficult to put these methods to industrial use. Therefore, we studied simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) for ethanol production [15,16], which shows the potential to reduce production costs via the simplification of the production process by avoiding enzymatic hydrolysis step.
SSF is one of the fermentation methods that consists in the enzymatic hydrolysis of the hydrothermally treated samples of plant biomass to extract monosaccharides and then the direct utilization of them for biofuel production. This means that SSF enables simultaneous enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation for biofuel production in a single vessel. Therefore, enzymatic hydrolysis using separate containers is no longer required, and the number of reactors included in the overall process is reduced, which simplifies the production process, reduces the energy input, and contributes to reducing production costs. Moreover, reducing the risk of contamination is another feature. Unlike with the method of performing enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation for biofuel production separately, the risk of contamination is reduced because the prepared hydrolysate is not added to another reactor for use in fermentation. Because of its superior features, SSF has attracted much interest in the development of industrial bioprocesses [17].
In this study, we demonstrate that a combination of commercial saccharification enzymes such as Cellulase ONOZUKA R-10 [18] and Macerozyme R-10 [19] are effective for the production of glucose and xylose from hydrothermally treated banana peel samples. To enable future scale-up using an isobutanol-producing Escherichia coli strain [14], isobutanol was produced using SSF with the hydrothermally treated samples by a method that involves a magnetic stirrer, which has a similar working configuration to that used in the stirred tank bioreactors [20].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Enzymatic Hydrolysis

After drying banana peels (Musa sp.) for 3 days at 50 °C in an incubator (SLI-700; EYELA, Tokyo, Japan), the dried samples were milled using a cutter mill (ABSOLUTE3; Osaka Chemical, Osaka, Japan), yielding a powder (particle size: 100–200 µm). On the basis of the findings of our previous study [21], the hydrothermal treatment of the powder was carried out. Briefly, 10 g of the powder was placed in an autoclave with 100 mL water for 30 min at 130 °C, and the resulting hydrothermally treated samples were used as the initial raw material for enzymatic hydrolysis.
The reaction mixture (5 mL) for enzymatic hydrolysis contained 20 mM acetate buffer (pH 5.0), Cellulase ONOZUKA R-10 (10,000 U/g; Yakult, Tokyo, Japan), Macerozyme R-10 (3000 U/g; Yakult), and the hydrothermally treated samples (0.5–4.0 g) in a 10 mL screw-capped vial with a magnetic stirrer. The reaction mixture was incubated for 3 h at 35 °C while stirring at 500 rpm.
Using 0.1 g of the hydrothermally treated banana peel samples, the effects of various enzyme unit ratios were examined. The effects of reaction temperatures were examined ranging from 35 to 50 °C. The effect of the sample gram was examined at ranging from 0.1 to 4.0 g.

2.2. Determination of Isobutanol Productivity

After the isobutanol-producing E. coli strain was grown overnight at 37 °C in Luria–Bertani medium, the culture was collected by centrifugation and washed twice with sterilized water. Subsequently, the washed culture was diluted to an OD600 = 0.1 with 15 mL of fresh M9Y medium (pH 6.5) in a 25 mL screw-capped vial with a magnetic stirrer and then cultured under the optimized conditions for isobutanol production [14]. The M9Y medium contained 40 g/L glucose, 8 g/L xylose, 5 g/L yeast extract and M9 minimal salts (17 g/L Na2HPO4·12H2O, 3 g/L KH2PO4, 1 g/L NH4Cl, 0.5 g/L NaCl, 0.24 g/L MgSO4·7H2O and 0.011 g/L CaCl2·2H2O). Isobutanol productivity was examined while varying the stirring speed between 500–1000 rpm. All data shown were obtained from at least from triplicate experiments.

2.3. Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation for Isobutanol Production

Using the isobutanol-producing E. coli strain, the SSF experiment was also performed in a 25 mL screw-capped vial containing a magnetic stirrer. The washed culture was diluted to an OD600 = 0.1 with 15 mL of the reaction mixture, which contained 9 g of hydrothermally treated banana peel samples, M9 minimal salts, 20 mM acetate (pH 5.0–6.0) or phosphate (pH 6.5) buffers, 15 U Cellulase ONOZUKA R-10 and 15 U Macerozyme R-10. The mixture was stirred at 500 rpm for 120 h at each initial culture pH, which ranged from pH 5.0 to 6.5.

2.4. Quantification of Sugar and Isobutanol

After each sample was clarified by centrifugation and filtration, the resultant supernatant was subjected to HPLC using an Aminex HPX-87H cationic exchange column (Bio-Rad Labs, Richmond, CA, USA). The concentrations of glucose, xylose and isobutanol were determined using a refractive index indicator. The chromatographic conditions were as follows: mobile phase, 1.5 mM H2SO4; flow rate, 0.6 mL/min; column oven temperature, 60 °C.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Use of Cellulase ONOZUKA R-10 and Macerozyme R-10 for Enzymatic Hydrolysis

To enable the industrial production of inexpensive chemicals such as biofuels, low production costs are essential. For example, acetone–butanol–ethanol fermentation has already been industrialized to use edible biomass, such as sugarcane as the raw material, and the production cost of biofuels is significantly affected by the raw material’s price, which accounts for 60–65% of the total production cost [22]. When edible biomass is used as raw material for biofuel production, a large amount of monosaccharides available to biofuel-producing microorganisms can be easily extracted from the raw material, as well as hydrothermal pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis are not necessary. Thus, the production cost is reduced by simplifying the total production process. On the other hand, when plant biomass is used as raw material, the cost of the raw material is lower than that of edible biomass, but the production process increases because monosaccharides cannot be easily extracted from plant biomass. In the production of biofuels using plant biomass as the raw material, the extraction of monosaccharides such as glucose and xylose that can be used by genetically engineered microorganisms is essential. Glucose and xylose can be extracted from the breakdown of cellulose and hemicellulose in plant biomass tissue. To extract the monosaccharides, several kinds of commercial saccharification enzymes are available on the market (Table 1). In particular, Acremonium cellulase, Optimash BG and Novozyme188 have been used extensively, because these enzymes exhibit several high-level activities that degrade hydrothermally treated materials prepared from various biomass [23,24,25,26]. On the other hand, Cellulase ONOZUKA R-10, which is prepared from Trichoderma viride, shows high cellulase, α-amylase, hemicellulase and pectinase activities [18]. Macerozyme R-10, which is prepared from Rhizopus sp., shows high pectinase and hemicellulase activities [19]. In other words, Cellulase ONOZUKA R-10 and Macerozyme R-10 are among the commercially available enzymes with hemicellulase activity, and the combination of these enzymes is useful for the degradation of banana peel tissue, which contains cellulose and hemicellulose as its main components.
The optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis is essential to achieve maximum isobutanol production from hydrothermally treated banana peel samples at a minimum cost. Thus, to optimize the conditions for enzymatic hydrolysis, the effects of the enzyme unit ratio, reaction temperature and sample gram were evaluated. The reaction pH was set at 5.0, which is optimal pH for both enzymes. Examination of the enzyme unit ratio showed that glucose and xylose concentrations were highest when the enzyme unit ratio was 5:5 (Figure 1A). In particular, the glucose concentration achieved using the two enzymes together was about 1.1 times higher than that achieved using Cellulase ONOZUKA R-10 or Macerozyme R-10 alone. When the enzyme unit ratio was kept at 5:5, the highest glucose and xylose concentrations were obtained at 40 °C (Figure 1B). The glucose and xylose concentrations decreased at temperatures above 45 °C (Figure 1B), likely due to the thermal denaturation of the enzymes. Consistent with this idea, both enzymes are mesophilic and are reportedly denatured and inactivated above 45 °C [18,19]. On the other hand, the optimal temperature for isobutanol production using the isobutanol-producing E. coli strain is 32 °C [14]. Therefore, to avoid denaturation and inactivation of both enzymes, as well as to activate the E. coli strain during SSF, the reactions were run at 35 °C. When the effect of the sample gram was assessed, the glucose and xylose concentrations increased with an increasing sample gram up to 3.0 but were markedly reduced at 4.0 g (Figure 1C). The enzyme reaction is more favorable in the presence of higher substrate concentrations because of the increased frequency of enzyme–substrate contact. However, for highly viscous substrates such as the hydrothermally treated banana peel samples, the reaction is suppressed by the viscosity of the reaction solution at substrate concentrations above the optimal. In the present study, a sample weight of 3.0 g was found to be optimal. In sum, the optimized reaction conditions for SSF for isobutanol production were as follows: enzyme unit ratio, 5:5; reaction temperature, 35 °C; sample gram, 3.0 g.

3.2. Effect of Stirring Speed on Isobutanol Production

Akita et al. previously developed an isobutanol-producing E. coli strain [14]. To enable isobutanol production, five heterologous genes, including alsS, ilvCD, kivd and adhA, were introduced into the genome of the E. coli MG1655 strain which are expressed by xylose induction [14]. In this strain, the five enzymes promote sequential reactions to produce isobutanol from pyruvate (Figure 2). Firstly, acetolactate synthase (encoded by alsS) converts two molecules of pyruvate to 2-acetolactate, and then 2-acetolactate is converted to 2,3-dihydroxyvalerate by ketol-acid reductoisomerase (encoded by ilvC). Subsequently, 2,3-dihydroxyvalerate is converted to 2-ketoisovalerate by dihydroxy-acid dehydratase (encoded by ilvD), and then 2-ketoisovalerate is further converted to isobutyraldehyde by 2-keto acid decarboxylase (encoded by kivd), yielding isobutyraldehyde. Finally, isobutanol is produced from isobutyraldehyde by alcohol dehydrogenase (encoded by adhA). Although E. coli has a native alcohol dehydrogenase (encoded by yqhD), alcohol dehydrogenase from Lactococcus lactis is used for isobutanol production, scince this enzyme is advantageous because of the utilization of NADH rather than NADPH as a cofactor. In the artificial pathway of the isobutanol-producing E. coli strain, the five enzymes are derived from mesophiles, so the reaction can proceed at room temperature.
Recent studies have reported the isolation and identification of the cellulolytic strain Bacillus coagulans MA-13, suggesting that it is a useful strain to produce biofuels by SSF [27]. However, the cellulolytic activity of B. coagulans MA-13 is relatively low, the addition of saccharification enzymes is required at the start of SSF. Thus, in addition to growing well under the optimal conditions for the activity of saccharification enzymes, the host must be able to metabolize the wide range of sugars produced by plant biomass. On the other hand, the isobutanol-producing E. coli strain is able to metabolize mixed sugars by eliminating carbon catabolite repression, which is a global regulatory mechanism that depresses the expression of genes required for the utilization of other sugars when glucose is present. Consequently, this strain can produce isobutanol through effective utilization of both glucose and xylose, which are the main components of plant biomass. When isobutanol was produced using the isobutanol-producing E. coli strain in a previous study, the shaking culture method was used with a conical flask with a screw cap [14]. Although this method is effective for lab-scale production, when considering a scale-up to industrial production, a bioreactor is more effective. In the present study, therefore, isobutanol production was performed in a screw-capped vial with a magnetic stirrer, which is the basic working configuration of a bioreactor.
An earlier investigation in our study found that when the isobutanol-producing E. coli strain is cultured in M9Y medium, isobutanol productivity reaches its maximum within 24 h [14]. For that reason, the effects of different stirring speeds on isobutanol concentration and productivity were investigated after incubating cultures for 24 h in the present study. The highest level of production was observed with a stirring speed of 500 rpm (Table 2). This result confirms that the used method is effective for isobutanol production by the strain, which is fundamental for a potential scale-up. These increases in concentration and productivity were likely caused by an increase in the NADH production under micro-anaerobic conditions.
During isobutanol production, acetolactate synthase, ketol-acid reductoisomerase, dihydroxy-acid dehydratase, 2-ketoacid decarboxylase and alcohol dehydrogenase are overexpressed in the strain cells [14]. Ketol-acid reductoisomerase and alcohol dehydrogenase require NADH as a cofactor for the catalysis, and the levels of NADH are higher under anaerobic conditions than aerobic conditions. Moreover, under aerobic conditions, NADH is used to generate ATP for cell synthesis and maintenance rather than to generate secondary metabolites such as isobutanol [28]. We speculate that when isobutanol was produced at a stirring speed of 500 rpm, the productivity was enhanced because the culture was kept micro-anaerobic conditions.

3.3. SSF for Isobutanol Production

We next applied Cellulase ONOZUKA R-10, Macerozyme R-10 and the E. coli strain for SSF to produce isobutanol from hydrothermally treated banana peel samples. When the strain was incubated with the hydrothermally treated banana peel samples and the saccharification enzymes under the optimized reaction conditions, isobutanol production was observed at pH 5.0–6.5 (Figure 3A). Moreover, the isobutanol concentration increased with an increasing initial culture pH, and the highest concentration (1.27 g/L; Figure 3A), which is consistent with the optimal initial culture pH for isobutanol production by this E. coli strain [14]. Correspondingly, the concentrations of both glucose and xylose decreased with isobutanol production, and the lowest concentrations were observed at pH 6.5 (Figure 3B,C). These results indicate that the saccharification enzymes have sufficient hydrolytic activity at pH 6.5 to catalyze the production of glucose and xylose. It thus appears that it will be more important to increase the isobutanol productivity of the E. coli strain than to increase the activity of the saccharification enzymes.
Although the highest concentration of isobutanol was observed after incubation for 72 h at pH 6.5, the isobutanol concentration after 48 h when incubated at pH 6.0 (0.361 ± 0.000906 g/L) was 7.4-fold higher than that when incubated at pH 6.5 (0.0486 ± 0.0134 g/L; Figure 3A). The details of this result are unknown, but it may be because protein folding was slowed by incubation at pH 6.5, which may reduce the isobutanol productivity of the initial culture. According to Coutard et al., the folding of protein derived from foreign organisms is promoted at around pH 5.0–6.0 when the protein is expressed in E. coli cells [29]. On the other hand, the five enzymes necessary for isobutanol production show the maximum activity at pH 6.0–8.0 [30,31,32,33,34]. So, when cultured at pH 6.5, the isobutanol concentration was initially low due to the slow folding of the enzymes, but the amounts of the enzymes in the E. coli strain cells increased with the passage of incubation time, and the concentration increased as those enzymes reacted near their optimal pHs.
SSF using Cellulase ONOZUKA R-10, Macerozyme R-10 and an isobutanol-producing E. coli strain has several noteworthy features, which may be a potentially economical method for isobutanol production from plant biomass. First, the total production process of this method is simple. To date, several effective methods for isobutanol production have been developed [35], but they require expensive reagents to maintain the expression plasmids and induce gene expression for providing the isobutanol production capacity to the host. Moreover, plasmid-based expression requires genetic transformation to incorporate plasmids into the host cells, which takes approximately two days. By contrast, the E. coli strain does not require genetic transformation with expensive reagents for isobutanol production, because the five heterologous genes necessary for isobutanol production are all knocked into the genome, and the expressions of those genes are induced by xylose. Second, the implementation of this method is easy. In this method, isobutanol can be produced by reacting the isobutanol-producing E. coli strain, Cellulase ONOZUKA R-10 and Macerozyme R-10 in a synthetic medium containing hydrothermally treated banana peel samples as the main component. Moreover, since the basic working configuration of this method is similar to that of bioreactors, it can be easily applied to bioreactors, which can be expected to increase the production scale. However, to discuss production costs in more detail, demonstration tests based on plant-scale production are essential [36]. Moreover, to apply this method to industrial production, it is necessary to follow the regulatory guidelines for recombinant DNA experiments, such as the Cartagena Protocol. Thus, bioreactors must be prepared to prevent the leakage of genetically modified bacterium such as this E. coli strain.

3.4. Comparison of Isobutanol Productivity

Using plant biomass as the only carbon source, several methods for the microbial production of isobutanol have been developed on a laboratory scale (Table 3). When the hydrolysate prepared from Japanese cedar without supplementation with glucose and xylose was used as the medium, the isobutanol-producing E. coli strain produced 3.70 g/L isobutanol [14]. The concentration and productivity in the present study were about half those seen in the previous study. However, the method used in the present study reduces the number of steps required for isobutanol production, which would be expected to reduce production costs, making it a potentially effective approach to producing industrial isobutanol from plant biomass.
To enhance the efficiency of isobutanol production, the application of batch fermentation is considered an effective method. Since isobutanol is toxic to E. coli, the procedure for removing products from the hydrolysate is important. In fact, it has been reported that more than 50 g/L isobutanol can be produced from a synthetic medium using batch fermentation [39]. On the other hand, further improvement in the isobutanol-producing E. coli strain is also required. This may be achieved through the elimination of competing pathways of byproducts. According to Jung et al., the accumulation of acetate is an influential factor that decreases isobutanol productivity [40]. In E. coli cells, the starting material for isobutanol production is pyruvate, which is converted to acetate by pyruvate oxidase (encoded by poxB). This suggests that poxB knockout may improve isobutanol productivity by preventing pyruvate conversion to acetate. Another effective method is the utilization of an engineered enzyme. The activity of acetolactate synthase from B. subtilis when used in isobutanol production is improved by Gln487Ser mutation [41]. The mutant enzyme can catalyze both the condensation of two molecules of pyruvate to form 2-acetolactate and the decarboxylation of 2-ketoisovalerate to form isobutyraldehyde [42]. Consequently, the utilization of the mutant enzyme shortens the artificial isobutanol pathway by eliminating the need for 2-ketoacid decarboxylase, which would contribute to improving isobutanol productivity.
Changing the saccharification enzymes may also be effective in enhancing the efficiency of isobutanol production. Cellulase ONOZUKA R-10 and Macerozyme R-10 show the maximum activity at pH 5.0, but the optimal pH of the E. coli strain for isobutanol production is pH 6.5 [14]. Moreover, when isobutanol was produced at pH 5.0–6.5, the maximum concentration was found at pH 6.5 (Figure 3A). This result means that enhancing the activity of the E. coli strain rather than the activity of the saccharification enzymes leads to higher isobutanol concentrations in SSF with Cellulase ONOZUKA R-10, Macerozyme R-10 and the isobutanol-producing E. coli strain. Thus, isobutanol concentration can be enhanced if saccharification enzymes with a maximum activity at around pH 6.5 can be applied to SSF. Cellulase from Acetivibrio thermocellus [43], hemicellulase from Aspergillus ochraceus [44] and xylanase from B. subtilis [45] are known to show maximum activities at pH 6.5. To enhance isobutanol productivity, studies are planned on the production of isobutanol using batch fermentation, the aforementioned mutation to our isobutanol-producing E. coli strain and the use of the saccharification enzymes with maximum activity at around pH 6.5 in future studies.

4. Conclusions

In the present study, we used hydrothermally treated banana peel samples to determine the optimal conditions for the enzymatic hydrolysis of plant biomass. Subsequently, we demonstrated the efficacy of SSF for isobutanol production using an isobutanol-producing E. coli strain, Cellulase ONOZUKA R-10 and Macerozyme R-10 in a screw-capped vial with a magnetic stirrer. Under the optimized conditions, the highest isobutanol concentration (1.27 g/L) and productivity [0.0165 g/(L·h)] were obtained at pH 6.5, which indicates that glucose and xylose were produced by the enzymatic hydrolysis of the hydrothermally treated samples, and those sugars were consumed by the E. coli strain for isobutanol production. Although the highest concentrations and productivities achieved in this study were about half those seen in earlier studies, our method may be much more cost-effective and potentially advantageous for industrial use, as it does not require an enzymatic hydrolysis step or special expertise.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fermentation10030161/s1. Tables S1: Component of banana peel.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.A. (Hironaga Akita); methodology, H.A. (Hironaga Akita) and S.S.; validation, H.A. (Hironaga Akita) and S.S.; formal analysis, H.A. (Hironaga Akita), S.S., T.K. and H.A. (Hironaga Akita); investigation, H.A. (Hironaga Akita) and S.S.; resources, H.A. (Hironaga Akita); data curation, H.A. (Hironaga Akita) and S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, H.A. (Hironaga Akita); writing—review and editing, H.A. (Hironaga Akita), S.S., T.K., S.K., H.A. (Hiromichi Asamoto) and M.M.; visualization, H.A. (Hironaga Akita); supervision, H.A. (Hironaga Akita). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all members of the Department of Basic Science at our Institute (College of Industrial Technology, Nihon University) for their technical assistance and valuable discussion. We also thank Mitsunori Katayama for his technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Liu, Y.; Cruz-Morales, P.; Zargar, A.; Belcher, M.S.; Pang, B.; Englund, E.; Dan, Q.; Yin, K.; Keasling, J.D. Biofuels for a sustainable future. Cell 2021, 184, 1636–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Francis, J. Arctic meltdown and unruly tropical storms: Are they connected? Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 2021, 53, 223–224. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tebaldi, C.; Ranasinghe, R.; Vousdoukas, M.; Rasmussen, D.J.; Vega-Westhoff, B.; Kirezci, E.; Kopp, R.E.; Sriver, R.; Mentaschi, L. Extreme sea levels at different global warming levels. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2021, 11, 746–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xu, R.B.; Yu, P.; Abramson, M.J.; Johnston, F.H.; Samet, J.M.; Bell, M.L.; Haines, A.; Ebi, K.L.; Li, S.; Guo, Y. Wildfires, global climate change, and human health. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 2173–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Turco, M.; Rosa-Cánovas, J.J.; Bedia, J.; Jerez, S.; Montávez, J.P.; Llasat, M.C.; Provenzale, A. Exacerbated fires in Mediterranean Europe due to anthropogenic warming projected with non-stationary climate-fire models. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, X.M.; Sharma, A.; Liu, H. The Impact of climate change on environmental sustainability and human mortality. Environments 2023, 10, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. United Nations Report. Nature’s Dangerous Decline ‘Unprecedented’; Species Extinction Rates ‘Accelerating’. Available online: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/blog/2019/05/nature-decline-unprecedented-report/ (accessed on 30 January 2024).
  8. Putra, N.R.; Aziz, A.H.A.; Faizal, A.N.M.; Che Yunus, M.A. Methods and potential in valorization of banana peels waste by various extraction processes: In review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hikal, W.M.; Said-Al, A.H.A.H.; Bratovcic, A.; Tkachenko, K.G.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Kačániová, M.; Elhourri, M.; Atanassova, M. Banana peels: A waste treasure for human being. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2022, 2022, 7616452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ragab, M.; Osman, M.F.; Khalil, M.E.; Gouda, M.S. Banana (Musa sp.) peels as a source of pectin and some food nutrients. J. Agric. Res. Kafr El-Sheikh Univ. 2016, 42, 88–102. [Google Scholar]
  11. Martín, C.; Dixit, P.; Momayez, F.; Jönsson, L.J. Hydrothermal pretreatment of lignocellulosic feedstocks to facilitate biochemical conversion. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 846592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nakashima, N.; Akita, H.; Hoshino, T. Establishment of a novel gene expression method, BICES (biomass-inducible chromosome-based expression system), and its application to the production of 2,3-butanediol and acetoin. Metab. Eng. 2014, 25, 204–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Matsushika, A.; Hoshino, T. Increased ethanol production by deletion of HAP4 in recombinant xylose-assimilating Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 42, 1623–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Akita, H.; Nakashima, N.; Hoshino, T. Bacterial production of isobutanol without expensive reagents. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 991–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Akita, H.; Goshima, T.; Suzuki, T.; Itoiri, Y.; Kimura, Z.-i.; Matsushika, A. Application of Pichia kudriavzevii NBRC1279 and NBRC1664 to simultaneous saccharification and fermentation for bioethanol production. Fermentation 2021, 7, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Akita, H.; Matsushika, A. Transcription analysis of the acid tolerance mechanism of Pichia kudriavzevii NBRC1279 and NBRC1664. Fermentation 2023, 9, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mattedi, A.; Sabbi, E.; Farda, B.; Djebaili, R.; Mitra, D.; Ercole, C.; Cacchio, P.; Del Gallo, M.; Pellegrini, M. Solid-state fermentation: Applications and future perspectives for biostimulant and biopesticides production. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Beldman, G.; Searle-Van, L.M.F.; Rombouts, F.M.; Voragen, F.G. The cellulase of Trichoderma viride. Purification, characterization and comparison of all detectable endoglucanases, exoglucanases and β-glucosidases. Eur. J. Biochem. 1985, 146, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yamada, Y.; Kiso, K.; Sekiya, J.; Yasuda, T. Examination of the conditions for protoplast isolation from tobacco cells cultured in vitro. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1972, 36, 1055–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Schirmer, C.; Nussbaumer, T.; Schöb, R.; Pörtner, R.; Eibl, R.; Eibl, D. Development, engineering and biological characterization of stirred tank bioreactors. In Biopharmaceuticals; Yeh, M., Chen, Y., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; pp. 87–107. [Google Scholar]
  21. Akita, H.; Yusoff, M.Z.M.; Fujimoto, S. Preparation of oil palm empty fruit bunch hydrolysate. Fermentation 2021, 7, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mansur, M.C.; O’Donnell, M.K.; Rehmann, M.S.; Zohaib, M. ABE fermentation of sugar in Brazil. Snr. Des. Rep. 2010, 2010 17, 1–139. [Google Scholar]
  23. Fujimoto, S.; Inoue, S.; Yoshida, M. High solid concentrations during the hydrothermal pretreatment of eucalyptus accelerate hemicellulose decomposition and subsequent enzymatic glucose production. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2018, 4, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zakaria, M.R.; Norrrahim, M.N.; Hirata, S.; Hassan, M.A. Hydrothermal and wet disk milling pretreatment for high conversion of biosugars from oil palm mesocarp fiber. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 181, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yusoff, M.Z.M.; Akita, H.; Hassan, M.A.; Fujimoto, S.; Yoshida, M.; Nakashima, N.; Hoshino, T. Production of acetoin from hydrothermally pretreated oil mesocarp fiber using metabolically engineered Escherichia coli in a bioreactor system. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 245, 1040–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zakaria, M.R.; Hirata, S.; Hassan, M.A. Combined pretreatment using alkaline hydrothermal and ball milling to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of oil palm mesocarp fiber. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 169, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aulitto, M.; Fusco, S.; Bartolucci, S.; Franzén, C.J.; Contursi, P. Bacillus coagulans MA-13: A promising thermophilic and cellulolytic strain for the production of lactic acid from lignocellulosic hydrolysate. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2017, 10, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Unden, G.; Bongaerts, J. Alternative respiratory pathways of Escherichia coli: Energetics and transcriptional regulation in response to electron acceptors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1997, 1320, 217–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Coutard, B.; Danchin, E.G.; Oubelaid, R.; Canard, B.; Bignon, C. Single pH buffer refolding screen for protein from inclusion bodies. Protein Expr. Purif. 2012, 82, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Holtzclaw, W.D.; Chapman, L.F. Degradative acetolactate synthase of Bacillus subtilis: Purification and properties. J. Bacteriol. 1975, 121, 917–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tadrowski, S.; Pedroso, M.M.; Sieber, V.; Larrabee, J.A.; Guddat, L.W.; Schenk, G. Metal ions play an essential catalytic role in the mechanism of ketol-acid reductoisomerase. Chemistry 2016, 22, 7427–7436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Myers, J.W. Dihydroxy acid dehydrase: An enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of isoleucine and valine. J. Biol. Chem. 1961, 236, 1414–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Smit, B.A.; van Hylckama, V.J.E.; Engels, W.J.; Meijer, L.; Wouters, J.T.; Smit, G. Identification, cloning, and characterization of a Lactococcus lactis branched-chain alpha-keto acid decarboxylase involved in flavor formation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Arnau, J.; Jørgensen, F.; Madsen, S.M.; Vrang, A.; Israelsen, H. Cloning of the Lactococcus lactis adhE gene, encoding a multifunctional alcohol dehydrogenase, by complementation of a fermentative mutant of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1998, 180, 3049–3055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Novak, K.; Baar, J.; Freitag, P.; Pflügl, S. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli W for isobutanol production on chemically defined medium and cheese whey as alternative raw material. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 47, 1117–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. de Jong, S.; Hoefnagels, R.; Wetterlund, E.; Pettersson, K.; Faaij, A.; Junginger, M. Cost optimization of biofuel production—The impact of scale, integration, transport and supply chain configurations. Appl. Energy 2017, 195, 1055–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Su, H.; Lin, J.; Wang, G. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium crenatium for enhancing production of higher alcohols. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 39543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bumrungtham, P.; Promdonkoy, P.; Prabmark, K.; Bunterngsook, B.; Boonyapakron, K.; Tanapongpipat, S.; Champreda, V.; Runguphan, W. Engineered production of isobutanol from sugarcane trash hydrolysates in Pichia pastoris. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Baez, A.; Cho, K.M.; Liao, J.C. High-flux isobutanol production using engineered Escherichia coli: A bioreactor study with in situ product removal. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 90, 1681–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Jung, H.M.; Lee, J.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Oh, M.K. Improved production of isobutanol in pervaporation-coupled bioreactor using sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate in engineered Enterobacter aerogenes. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 259, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sommer, B.; von Moeller, H.; Haack, M.; Qoura, F.; Langner, C.; Bourenkov, G.; Garbe, D.; Loll, B.; Brück, T. Detailed structure-function correlations of Bacillus subtilis acetolactate synthase. Chembiochem 2015, 16, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Atsumi, S.; Li, Z.; Liao, J.C. Acetolactate synthase from Bacillus subtilis serves as a 2-ketoisovalerate decarboxylase for isobutanol biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 6306–6311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Singh, R.N.; Akimenko, V.K. Isolation of a cellobiohydrolase of Clostridium thermocellum capable of degrading natural crystalline substrates. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1993, 192, 1123–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Romero-Borbon, E.; Grajales-Hernandez, D.; Armendariz-Ruiz, M.; Ramirez-Velasco, L.; Rodriguez-Gonzalez, J.; Cira-Chavez, L.; Estrada-Alvarado, M.; Mateos-Diaz, J. Type C feruloyl esterase from Aspergillus ochraceus A butanol specific biocatalyst for the synthesis of hydroxycinnamates in a ternary solvent system. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 35, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nishitani, K.; Nevins, D.J. Enzymic analysis of feruloylated arabinoxylans (Feraxan) derived from Zea mays cell walls. I. Purification of novel enzymes capable of dissociating Feraxan fragments from Zea mays coleoptile cell wall. Plant Physiol. 1988, 87, 883–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fermentation 10 00161 g001
Figure 1. Effects of reaction conditions on enzymatic hydrolysis yielding glucose and xylose. The concentrations of glucose and xylose are shown as white and blue bars, respectively: (A) effect of the enzyme unit ratio (Cellulase ONOZUKA R-10: Macerozyme R-10); (B) effect of reaction temperature; (C) effect of sample gram. Error bars indicate SE (n = 3).
Figure 1. Effects of reaction conditions on enzymatic hydrolysis yielding glucose and xylose. The concentrations of glucose and xylose are shown as white and blue bars, respectively: (A) effect of the enzyme unit ratio (Cellulase ONOZUKA R-10: Macerozyme R-10); (B) effect of reaction temperature; (C) effect of sample gram. Error bars indicate SE (n = 3).
Fermentation 10 00161 g001
Fermentation 10 00161 g002
Figure 2. Artificial pathway for isobutanol production. Acetolactate synthase (EC 2.2.1.6) is from Bacillus subtilis. Ketol-acid reductoisomerase (EC 1.1.1.86) and dihydroxy-acid dehydratase (EC 4.2.1.9) are native enzymes of E. coli. 2-Keto acid decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.72) and alcohol dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.1) are from L. lactis.
Figure 2. Artificial pathway for isobutanol production. Acetolactate synthase (EC 2.2.1.6) is from Bacillus subtilis. Ketol-acid reductoisomerase (EC 1.1.1.86) and dihydroxy-acid dehydratase (EC 4.2.1.9) are native enzymes of E. coli. 2-Keto acid decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.72) and alcohol dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.1) are from L. lactis.
Fermentation 10 00161 g002
Fermentation 10 00161 g003
Figure 3. Comparison of the time courses of isobutanol production by SSF with hydrothermally treated banana peel samples: (A) isobutanol concentration; (B) glucose concentration; (C) xylose concentration. Error bars indicate SE (n = 3).
Figure 3. Comparison of the time courses of isobutanol production by SSF with hydrothermally treated banana peel samples: (A) isobutanol concentration; (B) glucose concentration; (C) xylose concentration. Error bars indicate SE (n = 3).
Fermentation 10 00161 g003
Table 1. List of commercial saccharification enzymes.
Table 1. List of commercial saccharification enzymes.
Saccharification EnzymeActivitySourceSupplier
Accellerase 1500Cellulase, xylanaseTrichoderma reeseiGenencor
Acremonium cellulaseβ-Glucosidase, cellulase,
xylanase		Acremonium cellulolyticusMeiji Seika
Biocellulase Aβ-GlucosidaseAspergillus nigerQuest Intl
Bio-feed Beta Lβ-glucosidase, cellulase,
xylanase		Trichoderma longibrachiatum,
T. reesei		Novozymes
Cellubrixβ-Glucosidase, cellulase,
xylanase		T. longibrachiatum,
A. niger		Novozymes
Cellulase 2000 LCellulase, xylanaseT. longibrachiatum,
T. reesei		Rhodia-Danisco
Cellulase APβ-Glucosidase, cellulaseA. nigerAmano Enzyme
Cellulase ONOZUKA R-10α-Amylase, cellulase,
hemicellulase, pectinase		Trichoderma viridYakult
Cellulase TRLβ-GlucosidaseT. longibrachiatum,
T. reesei		Solvay Enzymes
Cellulyve 50 LCellulase, xylanaseT. longibrachiatum,
T. reesei		Lyven
Energex Lβ-Glucosidase, cellulase,
xylanase		T. longibrachiatum,
T. reesei		Novozymes
GC220β-Glucosidase, cellulase,
xylanase		T. longibrachiatum,
T. reesei		Genencor
GC440β-Glucosidase, cellulase,
xylanase		T. longibrachiatum,
T. reesei		Genencor
GC880β-Glucosidase, cellulase,
xylanase		T. longibrachiatum,
T. reesei		Genencor
Macerozyme R-10Hemicellulase, pectinaseRhizopus sp.Yakult
Novozyme 188α-Amylase, β-glucosidase,
cellulase, glucoamylase,
xylanase		A. nigerNovozymes
Optimash BGβ-Glucosidase, cellulase,
xylanase		Not definedGenencor International
Rohament CLβ-Glucosidase, cellulase,
xylanase		T. longibrachiatum,
T. reesei		AB Enzymes
Spezyme CPCellulase, xylanaseT. longibrachiatum,
T. reesei		Genencor
Ultraflo Lβ-Glucosidase, cellulase,
xylanase		T. longibrachiatum,
T. reesei		Novozymes
Ultraflo XLα-AmylaseBacillus amyloliquefaciens,
Humicola insolens		Novozymes
Viscofermβ-Glucosidase, cellulase,
xylanase		Not definedNovozymes
Viscostar 150 Lβ-Glucosidase, cellulase,
xylanase		T. longibrachiatum,
T. reesei		Dyadic
Viscozyme Lβ-Glucosidase, cellulase,
xylanase		Aspergillus sp.Novozymes
Table 2. Comparison of isobutanol concentration and productivity after 24 h of incubation using M9Y medium.
Table 2. Comparison of isobutanol concentration and productivity after 24 h of incubation using M9Y medium.
Stirring Speed
(rpm)		Concentration
(g/L)		Productivity
[(g/(L·h)]
5004.62 ± 0.1220.193 ± 0.00512
7504.26 ± 0.1840.178 ± 0.00768
10003.79 ± 0.3690.158 ± 0.0154
Table 3. Comparison of isobutanol concentration and productivity when using plant biomass as the only carbon source.
Table 3. Comparison of isobutanol concentration and productivity when using plant biomass as the only carbon source.
StrainUse of Expression
Plasmid		Source
Material		Production
Process		Concentration
(g/L)		Productivity
[(g/(L·h)]		Reference
Corynebacterium crenatium MA11CYesDuckweed2 steps5.610.0688[37]
E. coli mlcXT7-LAFC-AAKCDNoBanana peel2 steps1.27 ± 0.1910.0148 ± 0.00200 *This study
E. coli mlcXT7-LAFC-AAKCDNoJapanese cedar3 steps3.70 ± 0.03560.0386 ± 0.000376[14]
Pichia pastoris PPY0311YesSugarcane trash3 steps0.0482 ± 0.001700.000669 ± 0.0000236[38]
* The value was calculated from the concentration after 72 h of incubation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Akita, H.; Shibata, S.; Komoriya, T.; Kamei, S.; Asamoto, H.; Matsumoto, M. Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation for Isobutanol Production from Banana Peel. Fermentation 2024, 10, 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10030161

AMA Style

Akita H, Shibata S, Komoriya T, Kamei S, Asamoto H, Matsumoto M. Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation for Isobutanol Production from Banana Peel. Fermentation. 2024; 10(3):161. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10030161

Chicago/Turabian Style

Akita, Hironaga, Shodai Shibata, Tomoe Komoriya, Shinnosuke Kamei, Hiromichi Asamoto, and Masakazu Matsumoto. 2024. "Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation for Isobutanol Production from Banana Peel" Fermentation 10, no. 3: 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10030161

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop