Next Article in Journal
Preparation of CCF/MWCNT-OH/Graphite/Resin Composite Bipolar Plates Using Bi-Directional Interfacial Modification and Study of Their Performance Improvement and the Mechanism of Their Interfacial Bonding Improvement
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Impacts and Adsorption Isotherms of Coconut Shell Activated Carbon: Effect of Acid Activation, Water, and Fuel
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fabrication of Cu-Doped Diamond-like Carbon Film for Improving Sealing Performance of Hydraulic Cylinder of Shearers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

One-Pot Bottom-Up Synthesis of SiO2 Quantum Dots and Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) Nanocomposite as Anode Materials in Lithium-Ion Batteries

1
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
2
Hierarchical Green-Energy Materials (Hi-GEM) Research Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 14 November 2024 / Revised: 5 March 2025 / Accepted: 7 March 2025 / Published: 10 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Micro/Nanofabrication of Carbon-Based Devices and Their Applications)

Abstract

:
Here, crystalline SiO2 quantum dots (QDs) of 3–5 nm size were grown within the layers of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) by a solution mode chemical growth process at a relatively low temperature (100 °C). The composite was applied as a negative electrode in a Li-ion half-cell battery and the electrochemical investigation confirmed a distinct first-cycle discharge/charge capacity (~865 mAhg−1/387 @ 51 mAg−1). The battery could retain a capacity of 296 mAhg−1 after 60 charge/discharge cycles with 99% coulombic efficiency. Furthermore, at a high current rate of 1.02 Ag−1, the battery was able to display an apparent rate capability (214.47 mAhg−1), indicating the high chemical and mechanical stability of the composite at a high current rate. A structural analysis revealed clear distinct diffraction peaks of SiO2 and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy images showed discrete atomic planes, thereby confirming the growth of crystalline SiO2 QDs within the layers of rGO.

1. Introduction

Recently, SiO2 has attracted a lot of attention in lithium-ion battery research due to it high abundance, low cost, high theoretical capacity (~1965 mAhg−1), better cycling stability, easy availability and good working potential [1,2,3]. The formation of Li2O (lithium oxide) and Li silicates (LixSiOy) during the lithiation reaction usually buffers the volume change, thereby improving the electrochemical property. However, the poor electrical conductivity and low initial coulombic efficiency (ICE) due to the irreversible consumption of active Li ions, leading to large volume expansion, are the bottlenecks for future applications such as electric hybrid vehicles. In order to enhance the electrochemical properties of SiO2-based anodes, several approaches have been undertaken to engineer the size/morphology as hollow SiO2 microspheres [4], nanobelts [5], submicron silica [6], nanospheres [7] and hollow and porous structures [8,9], thereby achieving good electrochemical performance (750 mAhg−1 (@ 100 mAg−1) until the 500th cycle [4], 534 mAhg−1 (@ 0.1 C) after 70 cycles [5], 602 mAhg−1 (@ 100 mAg−1) at the 150th cycle [6], 876.7 mAhg−1 (@ 1 C) over 500 cycles [7] and 919 mAhg−1 over 30 cycles [8]).
Investigations were carried out to enhance the electronic and ionic conductivity of SiO2 by preparing composites in the form of SiO2 nanotubes/C nanofiber mat [10], SiO2 nanotubes coated with nitrogen-doped carbon layers [11], SiO2@C core-shell sub-microsphere [12], carbon-coated silica nanoparticles [13], SiO2/C composite fibers [14], a silica nanonetwork confined to a nitrogen-doped ordered mesoporous carbon framework [15] and nanostructured silica/carbon composite spheres [16,17]. Zhang et al. [10] synthesized a SiO2 nanotube–carbon nanofiber mat by electrospinning which delivered a good capacity of 1067 mAhg−1 (562 mAhg−1) at a current density of 100 mAg−1 (1000 mAg−1) after 300 (700) cycles. The composite had high mechanical flexibility and could be used as a free-standing electrode without any binder, carbon black or current collector. Zhang et al. [11] described the synthesis of a SiO2 nanotube coated with N-doped carbon layers that achieved a distinct specific capacity (781 mAhg−1 (100 mAg−1) after the 200th cycle). The composite was synthesized by a combination of the sol–gel method and dopamine self polymerization and N-doped carbon layers enhanced the electronic conductivity and Li+ diffusion rate of SiO2. Similarly, other SiO2/C nanocomposites delivered relatively good electrochemical performances (349.2 mAhg−1 @ 100 mAg−1 after 200 cycles [12], 440.7 mAhg−1 @ 0.5 Ag−1 after 500 cycles [13] and 800 mAhg−1 @ 200 mAg−1 after 20 cycles [15]). All these interesting electrochemical performances of SiO2, SiO2/C composites inspired us to revisit and investigate the SiO2-based composite with graphene [18,19] or reduced graphene oxide, which has hardly been studied.
The growth of crystalline SiO2 quantum dots over reduced graphene oxide (rGO) might be one of the preferable choices for enhancing the active surface area, electrical conductivity and flexibility to accommodate the volume change and achieve a high capacity. Furthermore, the synthesis of SiO2 quantum dots directly from the Si precursor, with a direct Si-O bond using a low temperature and bottom-up approach, might be an economic and energy-efficient method compared to high-temperature processes and is worth investigating. For example, Si starting materials, such as APTMS (3-(aminopropyl)-trimethoxysilane), have a direct Si-O bond in the complex, making them very suitable starting precursor materials for the production of SiO2. Therefore, we developed a solution mode low-temperature (100 °C) growth process for the production of SiO2-rGO nanocomposites where the crystallization of SiO2 from a Si precursor and the chemical reduction of GO to rGO take place at the same time.

2. Materials and Methods

First, 10 mL of the Si starting material, (3-Aminopropyl) trimethoxysilane (APTMS, H2N(CH2)3Si(OCH3)3), was mixed with 40 mL deionized (DI) water in a round-bottomed (RB) flask; an ascorbic acid (AA, 0.66075 g, 0.3 M) solution in DI water (12.5 mL) was added slowly under continuous stirring for 20 min. Then, the solution mixture in the RB flask was placed on a heating mantle at 100 °C for 5 h under continuous stirring, which was then cooled down naturally to room temperature. Then, the modified APTMS solution was gradually injected into GO (1 g) solution in deionized water (100 mL) under stirring conditions for 30 min. A further chemical reaction was carried out under a reducing condition with the drop by drop addition of an aqueous solution of 1.5 g NaBH4 (sodium borohydride) in 20 mL of water and the chemical reaction was continued for 60 min. Black color precipitates produced in the solution were repeatedly washed and dried by a standard protocol; the dried powder was then annealed at 650 °C for 4 h in Ar atmosphere for further investigation.
X-ray diffraction was used to confirm the crystallographic structure of the nanocomposite. The morphology and concentration of the different elements were characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) attached with TEM. The different bond vibrations were identified by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Anodes in the form of CR2032-type coin cells were fabricated for electrochemical studies.
The slurry was prepared by combining the solid components as 65 wt. % of active materials, 20 wt. % Super P (MMM Carbon, Belgium), 9 wt. % poly (acrylic acid) (PAA, Sigma-Aldrich Co.), 3.5 wt. % styrene butadiene rubber (SBR, Zeon Co.), and 2.5 wt. % carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC, Sigma-Aldrich Co.). Mixing was performed in a planetary mixer (G-Mixer 400S, Gold Max Applied Materials Co.). The electrodes were prepared by casting the slurry onto a sheet of copper foil (Nippon Foil Co.) followed by drying in an oven at 90 °C for 1 h. The composite anode was stored in a glove box (with oxygen and humidity maintained below 10 ppm) for more than 24 h before electrochemical testing. For the cycle test, the cells underwent galvanostatic charge/discharge tests between 0.002 and 1.5 V versus Li+/Li using a multichannel battery testing system (AcuTech Systems BAT-750B).

3. Results and Discussion

The un-annealed and annealed (650 °C) SiO2 QD-rGO nanocomposite revealed several distinct X-ray diffraction peaks, as observed in the XRD spectra (Figure 1a), which confirmed the polycrystalline nature of the SiO2 QDs. The main XRD peak at 26.56° for un-annealed sample shifted toward a lower Bragg angle of 26.33° after annealing at 650 °C. All the other peaks were indexed, matching well with the standard JCPDS database (PDF 46-1045) of SiO2. The nanocomposite showed relatively good absorption at 992 cm−1 in the FTIR spectra (Figure 1b), which is attributed to Si-O-Si bond. Several other weak peaks at 1563 cm−1, 1443 cm−1, 783 cm−1 and 687 cm−1 were also observed, corresponding to C-C and Si-C bonds, respectively. The Si 2p XPS spectrum (Figure 1c) revealed an asymmetric peak indicating contributions from both Si3+ (102.30 eV for SiO3C) and Si4+ (103.5 eV for SiO2) oxidation states [20]. The corresponding Raman spectra (Figure 1d) showed peaks at ~1343 cm−1 and 1583 cm−1 corresponding to the D band (disordered or amorphous carbon) and the G band (graphitic carbon), respectively. The D band is k point phonon in A1g symmetry, whereas the G band is E2g phonon of sp2 bonded carbon atoms in the honey-comb lattice. The intensity ratio (ID/IG) increased from 1.01 to 1.04 after annealing, indicating a decrease in the average size of the sp2 domains due to the annealing-induced reduction of the rGO [21,22].
The formation of highly crystalline SiO2 quantum dots of 3–5 nm size over the rGO sheets [23] was confirmed by a high-resolution TEM image with clear distinct atomic planes (Figure 1e) and the lattice spacing was evaluated as 0.277 nm and 0.312 nm, corresponding to the (110) and (101) planes. The EDS analysis in Figure 1f shows all the elements, including Si (~20 at. %), and area mapping revealed complete coverage of Si and O over rGO.
The nanocomposite was used to fabricate the battery half-cell that delivered an obvious high discharge/charge capacity of 865 mAhg−1 (388.6 mAhg−1), 417 mAhg−1 (370.6 mAhg−1), and 398 mAhg−1 (363.4 mAhg−1) in the first, second and third cycles at a current rate of 51 mAg−1 (Figure 2a). After 60 charge/discharge cycles, the composite could retain a noticeable capacity of ~286 mAhg−1 and the coulombic efficiency could reach as high as 96%, as shown in Figure 2b. The composite delivered good capacities (Figure 2c) of 350 mAhg−1 (51 mAg−1), 280.78 mAhg−1 (200 mAg−1) and ~213 mAhg−1 @ 1 Ag−1 with increasing current rate, indicating the high physical and chemical stability of the SiO2 QD-rGO nanocomposite at a high current rate. The capacity further returned to 308 mAhg−1 with the reversal of the current rate to 51 mAg−1 at 60 cycles, which indicated the high physical stability of the composite after 50 charge/discharge cycles at a high current rate, thereby increasing its applicability as future anode material in LIBs. Unlike in earlier studies [23,24,25], where the specific capacity of milled SiO dropped drastically with cycle number, the capacity of the SiOx/rGO nanocomposite is very stable after several charge/discharge cycles.

4. Conclusions

A strategic solution-based low-temperature synthesis methodology was developed to grow crystalline SiO2 QDs within rGO layers. The nanocomposite was subsequently fabricated as an anode electrode in a Li-ion battery half-cell, delivering a good electrochemical performance in terms of cyclic stability and rate capability (~213 mAhg−1 @ 1 Ag−1, after 50 cycles) and confirming the high physical and chemical stability of the composite.

Author Contributions

S.B.: conceptualization, investigation, methodology, data curation, formal analysis, visualization, validation, project administration, funding acquisition, writing—original draft preparation, writing—reviewing and editing. C.-Y.W.: data curation, formal analysis. Y.-H.H.: data curation, formal analysis. W.-F.L.: data curation, formal analysis. J.-L.H.: supervision, conceptualization, visualization, resources, methodology, project administration, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC 112-2221-E-006-066-MY2, NSTC 112-2221-E-006-069-MY2). We acknowledge the financial support from the Hierarchical Green-Energy Materials (Hi-GEM) Research Center and from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Liu, Z.; Yu, Q.; Zhao, Y.; He, R.; Xu, M.; Feng, S.; Li, S.; Zhou, L.; Mai, L. Silicon oxides: A promising family of anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 285–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nelson, A.; Mateti, S.; Chen, Y.; Sharma, N.; Han, Q.; Rahman, M.M. Creating value added nano silicon anodes from end-of-life photovoltaic modules: Recovery, nano structuring, and the impact of ball milling and binder on its electrochemical performance. Energy Mater. 2024, 4, 40064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xie, G.; Tan, X.; Shi, Z.; Peng, Y.; Ma, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Wang, F.; He, J.; Zhu, Z.; Cheng, X.B. SiOx Based Anodes for Advanced Li-Ion Batteries: Recent Progress and Perspectives. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35, 2414714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ma, X.; Wei, Z.; Han, H.; Wang, X.; Cui, K.; Yang, L. Tunable construction of multi-shell hollow SiO2 microspheres with hierarchically porous structure as high-performance anodes for lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 323, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xue, M.; Zhou, Y.; Geng, J.; Zeng, P.; Xu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Tang, W.; Wu, P.; Wei, S.; Zhou, Y. Hollow porous SiO2 nanobelts containing sulfur for long-life lithium–sulfur batteries. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 91179–91184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liang, C.; Zhou, L.; Zhou, C.; Huang, H.; Liang, S.; Xia, Y.; Gan, Y.; Tao, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, W. Submicron silica as high− capacity lithium storage material with superior cycling performance. Mater. Res. Bull. 2017, 96, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tu, J.; Yuan, Y.; Zhan, P.; Jiao, H.; Wang, X.; Zhu, H.; Jiao, S. Straightforward approach toward SiO2 nanospheres and their superior lithium storage performance. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 7357–7362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yan, N.; Wang, F.; Zhong, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Hu, L.; Chen, Q. Hollow porous SiO2 nanocubes towards high-performance anodes for lithium-ion batteries. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, X.; Dhanabalan, A.; Meng, X.; Gu, L.; Sun, X.; Wang, C. Nanoporous tree-like SiO2 films fabricated by sol–gel assisted electrostatic spray deposition. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012, 151, 488–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Si, L.; Yan, K.; Li, C.; Huang, Y.; Pang, X.; Yang, X.; Sui, D.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Xu, C.C. Binder-free SiO2 nanotubes/carbon nanofibers mat as superior anode for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2022, 404, 139747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, X.; Li, K.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Dai, J.; Li, Y.; Ai, F. Facile fabrication of SiO2 nanotubes coated with nitrogen-doped carbon layers as high-performance anodes for lithium-ion batteries. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 1373–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jiang, Y.; Wen, J.; Ding, Z.; Ren, Y.; Liu, Z.; Chen, X.; Zhou, X. Li+ storage properties of SiO2@C core-shell submicrosphere and its hollow counterpart synthesized by molecular self-assembly in wet-chemistry condition as anodes for LIBs. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 861, 157932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. An, W.; Fu, J.; Su, J.; Wang, L.; Peng, X.; Wu, K.; Chen, Q.; Bi, Y.; Gao, B.; Zhang, X. Mesoporous hollow nanospheres consisting of carbon coated silica nanoparticles for robust lithium-ion battery anodes. J. Power Sources 2017, 345, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ren, Y.; Yang, B.; Wei, H.; Ding, J. Electrospun SiO2/C composite fibers as durable anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Solid State Ion. 2016, 292, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liang, Y.; Cai, L.; Chen, L.; Lin, X.; Fu, R.; Zhang, M.; Wu, D. Silica nanonetwork confined in nitrogen-doped ordered mesoporous carbon framework for high-performance lithium-ion battery anodes. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 3971–3975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wu, X.; Shi, Z.-q.; Wang, C.-y.; Jin, J. Nanostructured SiO2/C composites prepared via electrospinning and their electrochemical properties for lithium ion batteries. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2015, 746, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, M.; Yu, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, B.; Wu, X.; Tian, Y.; Chen, P. Nanosilica/carbon composite spheres as anodes in Li-ion batteries with excellent cycle stability. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 1476–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Meng, J.; Cao, Y.; Suo, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, X. Facile fabrication of 3D SiO2@ graphene aerogel composites as anode material for lithium ion batteries. Electrochimica Acta 2015, 176, 1001–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xiang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Li, J.; Xia, X.; He, Y.; Liu, H. Submicro-sized porous SiO2/C and SiO2/C/graphene spheres for lithium ion batteries. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2017, 21, 2425–2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yubero, F.; Barranco, A.; Mejías, J.; Espinos, J.; González-Elipe, A. Spectroscopic characterisation and chemical reactivity of silicon monoxide layers deposited on Cu (100). Surf. Sci. 2000, 458, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liang, J.; Wei, W.; Zhong, D.; Yang, Q.; Li, L.; Guo, L. One-step in situ synthesis of SnO2/graphene nanocomposites and its application as an anode material for Li-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2012, 4, 454–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, Y.; Lv, X.; Lu, J.; Li, J. Preparation of SnO2-nanocrystal/graphene-nanosheets composites and their lithium storage ability. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 21770–21774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Park, C.-M.; Choi, W.; Hwa, Y.; Kim, J.-H.; Jeong, G.; Sohn, H.-J. Characterizations and electrochemical behaviors of disproportionated SiO and its composite for rechargeable Li-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 4854–4860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hwa, Y.; Park, C.-M.; Sohn, H.-J. Modified SiO as a high performance anode for Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2013, 222, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yu, B.-C.; Hwa, Y.; Kim, J.-H.; Sohn, H.-J. A new approach to synthesis of porous SiOx anode for Li-ion batteries via chemical etching of Si crystallites. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 117, 426–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SiO2 quantum dot–rGO nanocomposite: (a) XRD spectra, (b) FTIR spectra, (c) Si 2p XPS spectrum, (d) Raman spectra, (e) HR-TEM image, and (f) composition analysis.
Figure 1. SiO2 quantum dot–rGO nanocomposite: (a) XRD spectra, (b) FTIR spectra, (c) Si 2p XPS spectrum, (d) Raman spectra, (e) HR-TEM image, and (f) composition analysis.
Carbon 11 00023 g001aCarbon 11 00023 g001bCarbon 11 00023 g001c
Figure 2. SiOx/rGO composite: (a) first three charge/discharge cycles and (b) cyclic stability, and (c) rate capability.
Figure 2. SiOx/rGO composite: (a) first three charge/discharge cycles and (b) cyclic stability, and (c) rate capability.
Carbon 11 00023 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Brahma, S.; Wang, C.-Y.; Huang, Y.-H.; Lin, W.-F.; Huang, J.-L. One-Pot Bottom-Up Synthesis of SiO2 Quantum Dots and Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) Nanocomposite as Anode Materials in Lithium-Ion Batteries. C 2025, 11, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/c11010023

AMA Style

Brahma S, Wang C-Y, Huang Y-H, Lin W-F, Huang J-L. One-Pot Bottom-Up Synthesis of SiO2 Quantum Dots and Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) Nanocomposite as Anode Materials in Lithium-Ion Batteries. C. 2025; 11(1):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/c11010023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Brahma, Sanjaya, Cheung-Yi Wang, Yi-Hsuan Huang, Wen-Feng Lin, and Jow-Lay Huang. 2025. "One-Pot Bottom-Up Synthesis of SiO2 Quantum Dots and Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) Nanocomposite as Anode Materials in Lithium-Ion Batteries" C 11, no. 1: 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/c11010023

APA Style

Brahma, S., Wang, C.-Y., Huang, Y.-H., Lin, W.-F., & Huang, J.-L. (2025). One-Pot Bottom-Up Synthesis of SiO2 Quantum Dots and Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) Nanocomposite as Anode Materials in Lithium-Ion Batteries. C, 11(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/c11010023

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop