Next Article in Journal
Photocatalytic and Antibacterial Properties of Doped TiO2 Nanopowders Synthesized by Sol−Gel Method
Next Article in Special Issue
Cobalt- and Copper-Based Chemiresistors for Low Concentration Methane Detection, a Comparison Study
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrophobic Cellulose Acetate Aerogels for Thermal Insulation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thermoresponsive Cationic Polymers: PFAS Binding Performance under Variable pH, Temperature and Comonomer Composition
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Gels
Volume 8
Issue 10
10.3390/gels8100672
gels-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Peptide-Based Hydrogel for Adsorption of Dyes and Pharmaceuticals in Water Remediation

by
Anna Fortunato
and
Miriam Mba
*
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Università degli Studi di Padova, Via Marzolo 1, 35131 Padova, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Gels 2022, 8(10), 672; https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8100672
Submission received: 20 September 2022 / Revised: 12 October 2022 / Accepted: 17 October 2022 / Published: 19 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functionalized Gels for Environmental Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The removal of dyes and pharmaceuticals from water has become a major issue in recent years due to the shortage of freshwater resources. The adsorption of these pollutants through nontoxic, easy-to-make, and environmentally friendly adsorbents has become a popular topic. In this work, a tetrapeptide–pyrene conjugate was rationally designed to form hydrogels under controlled acidic conditions. The hydrogels were thoroughly characterized, and their performance in the adsorption of various dyes and pharmaceuticals from water was investigated. The supramolecular hydrogel efficiently adsorbed methylene blue (MB) and diclofenac (DCF) from water. The effect of concentration in the adsorption efficiency was studied, and results indicated that while the adsorption of MB is governed by the availability of adsorption sites, in the case of DCF, concentration is the driving force of the process. In the case of MB, the nature of the dye–hydrogel interactions and the mechanism of the adsorption process were investigated through UV–Vis absorption spectroscopy. The studies proved how this dye is first adsorbed as a monomer, probably through electrostatic interactions; successively, at increasing concentrations as the electrostatic adsorption sites are depleted, dimerization on the hydrogel surface occurs.

1. Introduction

Pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs) are emerging contaminants that can be found in industrial and domestic wastewater, surface water, ground water, and, more problematically, in drinking water [1]. They include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (ibuprofen, diclofenac, naproxen), antibiotics (amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, nalidixic acid), anticonvulsants (carbamazepine, primidone), antidepressants (diazepam, meprobamate), and hormones (estrogen), among others. Tonnes of pharmaceutically active compounds are used every year to treat human and animal diseases in hospitals, households, aquaculture, or feedstock facilities. However, they are not fully adsorbed, and the unmetabolized drugs are excreted, entering wastewater or surface and groundwater. Inappropriate disposal of unwanted drugs is another source of contamination [2]. These wastewaters end up in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), which are not able to efficiently remove this class of pollutants before final recirculation as drinking water. For example, a concentration of 67 μg/L of carbamazepine was found in the effluents of a WWTP in Madrid, which treats water in an area where there is a university campus, several pharmaceutical industries, and a hospital [3]. Furthermore, leaching or inappropriate waste management in the pharmaceutical industry also contributes to the introduction of PhACs into the environment. For example, a concentration of 17.48 mg/L of ciprofloxacin was detected in wastewater effluents from a pharmaceutical industry in Croatia [4]. Low concentrations of PhACs in drinking water do not constitute an immediate public health risk; however, the effects due to long-term exposure are not known. On the other hand, the adverse effects of PhACs in the environment have already been reported in the literature, including the development of antibiotic resistance [5]. Thus, the development of processes for the removal of PhACs has become of major importance. New processes are needed to remove low concentrations of PhACs (ng to μg per liter) arriving to WWTPs, but there is also a need for in situ facilities that are capable of removing higher concentrations of these pollutants in industry effluents (μg-mg per liter) [6].
In addition to PhACs, dyes are a critical source of water pollution that make water unfit for drinking. They are widely used in different industries, particularly the textile industry. Due to their toxicity, the presence of organic dyes in water causes health disorders and disrupts aquatic life [7]. Among these dyes, methylene blue (MB) is released in quantity by industry into water sources, posing a health threat due to its toxicity, non-biodegradability, and carcinogenic property [8].
Various advanced technologies have been developed for the removal of dyes and PhACs from water, including advanced oxidation techniques, membrane filtration, adsorption, and membranes with sorption capacities [9,10,11]. Adsorption stands out due to its low energy consumption, easy operation, and high efficiency [12,13]. In this context, hydrogels have emerged as a suitable alternative. Hydrogels are ideal adsorbents because of their high hydrophilicity, large surface area, and the presence of multiple functional groups on the porous structure [14,15,16].
Short peptide self-assembly is a rapidly extending research field. Short peptides combine inherent biocompatibility and biodegradability with ease of synthesis and scalability. In addition, peptide self-assembly is well-understood, and both properties and self-assembly can be tuned through control of the peptide sequence [17,18,19,20,21,22]. Short peptides self-assemble in water, through a combination of different noncovalent interactions, to give hydrogels [23,24,25]. These supramolecular soft materials have mainly found applications in biomedical fields [26,27,28,29], but also find applications in the development of conductive materials [30,31], catalysis [32], crystal growth [33], and water remediation. The efficiency of peptides and peptide-based hydrogels for oil spill recovery [34,35,36], removal of dyes [37,38,39], and metal cations [38,40] from water is well-documented in the literature. However, their application to the removal of PhACs from water is still at its beginning. Only recently, Giuri et al. reported the use of Boc-protected tripeptide hydrogels for the removal of diclofenac from water [41].
We recently reported the pyrene–pentapeptide conjugate 1 (Figure 1), and demonstrated that metal cations trigger its self-assembly in water to form metallo-hydrogels that efficiently adsorbed cationic dyes from water [42]. Although hydrogel formation was also achieved by simple pH variation in the absence of cationic metals, these pH-triggered hydrogels suffered from low mechanical stability and fell apart upon dye adsorption. To increase the environmental compatibility of the adsorbent, it is desirable to develop a metal-free peptide hydrogel. In this paper, we report a novel pyrene–tetrapeptide conjugate 2 able to form self-supporting hydrogels at acidic pH. The hydrogels efficiently removed cationic and zwitterionic dyes from water, and promising results were obtained for the adsorption of PhACs (Figure 1).

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Peptide Design and Synthesis

The structure of peptide 2 has alternating polar charged glutamic acids and hydrophobic phenylalanine residues. This pattern is known to favor the formation of β-sheets [43]. Here, the C-terminal has been amidated, while the N-terminal has been capped with a pyrene moiety, so the solubility of 2 in water is governed by the charge state of the Glu side chains. The large aromatic surface of pyrene can establish additional π–π interactions that facilitate self-assembly and interaction with aromatic pollutants. In addition, the fluorescence of this chromophore may provide information about self-assembly and allows for easy detection of peptide leaching [44]. The main differences between molecules 1 and 2 are the absence of the Gly residue in 2 and the introduction of a larger methylene spacer between the chromophore and the peptide. These structural modifications favor hydrogel formation at a lower gelator concentration of 2 compared to 1.
Peptide 2 was synthesized using standard Fmoc-based solid-phase peptide synthesis protocols on rink-amide resin, as described in the Materials and Methods section. The peptide was obtained in 85% yield, and its identity was assessed by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), electrospray mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) (see Scheme S1 and Figures S2–S4 of the Supporting Information).

2.2. Gelation Ability

The presence of two hydrophilic pH-sensitive amino acid residues (Glu) provides good solubility in basic water and introduces pH responsiveness.
As expected, 2 is not soluble in Milli-Q water alone (even after heating), but a transparent solution was obtained after the addition of 1.8 equivalents of NaOH 1M solution in combination with sonication. Acidification of the solution using both HCl and glucono-δ-lactone (GdL) led to the formation of self-supporting hydrogels, as assessed by the vial inversion test (Figure 2A and Figures S5 and S6 of the Supporting Information). HCl gels were formed in 10 min, while GdL gels required up to 18 h. Visually, the HCl gel was non-homogeneous, whereas the GdL gel was semitransparent and uniform. This phenomenon is well-known in the literature. When a strong acid such as HCl is used to trigger gelation, gel formation takes place faster than the diffusion of the acid in the solution, and gel spots can be found where the acid was added. Instead, GdL dissolves and diffuses into the solution before hydrolysis, leading to homogeneous gels. The minimum gelation concentration was found to be 0.1% for the GdL gel and 0.3% for the HCl gel. Interestingly, a gel–sol transition was not observed when heating any of the gels (Tgel); instead, at temperatures above 70 °C, the gels shrank, expelling part of the entrapped water (see Figure S5 of the Supporting Information).

2.3. Gel Characterization

The following studies were performed at a concentration of 0.5%, as the gels could be manipulated without damage.
The gel nature of the samples was confirmed by oscillatory rheology. Frequency sweep experiments (Figure 2B) showed that the elastic modulus (G’) of both gels was almost independent of the frequency in the studied range, and approximately one order of magnitude higher than the viscous modulus (G”), as expected for supramolecular gels [45]. Notably, the behavior of the two samples in amplitude sweep experiments differed significantly. The GdL gel displayed a linear viscoelastic behavior up to 1% of strain. Along with increasing applied strain, both G’ and G’’ deviated progressively from linearity until the crossover point was reached at 30% of the strain, where the gel–sol transition took place (Figure 2C). In contrast, we were unable to obtain amplitude sweep tests for the HCl sample, since hydrogel fracture occured even at low strain values. Again, the differences between the two samples may be related to the different gelation kinetics. The formation of macroscopic gel domains in the case of HCl gels also resulted in the formation of regions that were weaker and easily broken under strain. We also evaluated the self-recovery ability of the GdL gel using dynamic strain amplitude experiments (Figure 2D). The gel was subjected to several cycles of high strain values (150% strain) to force the gel–sol transition, which were alternated with low strain values (0.1% strain) to allow recovery. As shown in Figure 2D the GdL gel maintained its stability and showed mechanical recovery, though the storage modulus decreased by 8% after three cycles.
Because of the superior mechanical properties and reproducibility of gelation of GdL gels, we decided to continue our studies using exclusively these samples (Data for the HCl gels are given in Figures S7–S9 of the Supporting Information). From the morphological point of view, the GdL gel was investigated via transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Micrographs of the xerogels showed the formation of dense networks of tape-like fibrils (Figure 3). A closer look reveals narrower flat structures sprouting from the tape-like fibrils. Because this peptide is expected to give β-sheet bilayer structures, with the hydrophobic residues buried inside, a possible packing mode is the formation of β-sheet bilayers that are associated through edge-to-edge interactions, mediated by pyrene moieties [46].
The π–π interactions were studied using UV–Vis absorption and emission spectroscopies (Figure 4A and Figure S10 of the supporting Inormation). First, we investigated the behavior of a 50 μM solution of peptide at basic pH. The solution displays the typical absorption profile of pyrene: the S0→S2 transition gives an intense band between 360 nm and 290 nm with the 0-0 peak at 343 nm, whereas the peaks at 327 nm, 313 nm, and 300 nm are the vibronic replicas [44]. At a higher concentration (0.5%), the UV–Vis of the basic solution is characterized by a broadening and redshift of the absorption band. The 0-0 peak moves to 352 nm, and the relative intensity between 0-0 and its vibronic replicas changes. Concerning the emission spectra, the diluted solution shows a band ranging from 350 nm to 500 nm, which corresponds to the nonaggregated pyrene monomer. On the other hand, the 0.5% solution exhibits a broad and unstructured profile with a peak located at 420 nm and a long tail up to 650 nm. For the gelled sample, the broadening of the absorption band further increases, while in the emission spectra, a new broad band ranging from 350 to 700 nm appears. On the basis of these results, we can support the hypothesis that peptide monomers exist only in diluted basic solutions, while at higher concentrations, the hydrophobic pyrene cores tend to interact to each other through π–π stacking, an interaction that is reinforced upon gelation.
The secondary structure was studied by CD spectroscopy (Figure 4B). In the monomer state, the CD spectrum shows the typical profile of a random coil with disordered structure, characterized by a minimum at 204 nm. When the concentration of the solution was increased to 0.5%, a minimum at 225 nm was observed, indicating the formation of β-sheet structures [47,48]. However, the spectrum is dominated by strong Cotton effects observed in the absorption region of the pyrene chromophore, which are one order of magnitude more intense than the band at 225 nm. Thus, in agreement with absorption and emission data, CD suggests that in concentrated solution, strong π–π interactions between pyrene moieties become established, resulting in a supramolecular chiral arrangement of the chromophores [49]. Upon gelation, the negative band moves to shorter wavelengths, suggesting an increase of β-sheet content. Cotton effects are still observed in the pyrene absorption region, but with an intensity comparable to that of the β-sheet band.

2.4. Adsorption of Dyes

First, GdL gels were tested for the adsorption of methylene blue (MB). Three different experiment setups were investigated: (a) the gel was placed inside a syringe, and the MB solution was allowed to flow through the gel (Figure 5); (b) a preformed gel was immersed in a beaker containing the MB solution; (c) the gel was formed in a vial and the MB solution was casted on top of it. These preliminary studies were carried out under the same conditions (1 mL of GdL gel, 5 mL of MB solution at 50 mg/mL). A simple comparison by the naked eye of the solutions of pollutants after 24 h confirmed that, between the three setups, the first gave the best performances. Therefore, it was adopted for the subsequent studies (see Supporting Information for more details).
Next, we extended our studies to methyl orange (MO) and rhodamine B (RhB) and determined the dye removal efficiency (RE) by UV–Vis absorption spectroscopy using Equation (1) as follows:
R E   ( % ) = ( C 0 − C f ) C 0 × 100
where C0 is the initial concentration of pollutant and Cf is the concentration of pollutant in the eluted solution. A very good efficiency was obtained for the adsorption of MB (RE of 90%), while for both MO and RhB, the gel showed a poorer performance. The RE was 50% for RhB and only 16% for the negatively charged MO (Table 1, entries 1–3). No leaching of the gel components was detected in any case and the gel maintained its mechanical stability after dye adsorption, as assessed by inversion of the syringe (Figure 5C and Figure S11 of the Supporting Information). The better adsorption of MB can be justified by electrostatic interactions between the positively charged MB and deprotonated sites present on the GdL gel, which act simultaneously to hydrogen bonding, while the acidic groups present on RhB and MO may prevent efficient adsorption because of electrostatic repulsions between negative charges.
In the case of MO, UV–Vis analysis revealed not only a decreased concentration of the pollutant but also a red-shift of the absorption maxima. Analysis of the pH showed that the solution of the pollutant is more acidic upon contact with the hydrogel (pH 4.5). We attributed the shift of the absorption band to the acidic conditions, and, in agreement, the UV–Vis spectrum of MO registered at pH 4.5 was superimposable to that registered upon elution through the gel (see Supporting Information for details). At this pH, MO (pKa = 3.47) is not fully protonated, but both the neutral and anionic forms coexist.
The effect of the initial concentration of the dye on adsorption was investigated for MB. Data are summarized in Table 1, entries 3–5. To investigate the effect of concentration, additional solutions at 25 mg/L and 100 mg/L were prepared, and 5 mL were eluted through 1 mL of gel. Data reveal that RE decreases when increasing the initial concentration of MB from 25 to 50 mg/L, and then increases slightly when going from 50 to 100 mg/L.
The decrease of RE as initial concentration of MB increases can be related to the saturation of active adsorption sites on the hydrogel. The increase of RE with initial concentration deserves more attention. It is noted in the literature that depending on the concentration, MB exits in aqueous solution as monomer, dimer, trimer, or tetramer [50]. Moreover, it may adsorb to the adsorbent surface in any of its forms [51,52,53]. To gain more insight, we registered the UV–Vis spectra of the adsorbed dye and compared them to the UV–Vis spectra of the initial solutions of MB. Figure 6 shows the UV–Vis spectra of MB in aqueous solution at 25 and 50 mg/L (the one at 100 mg/L gave a saturated signal) and adsorbed MB on the hydrogel after elution of 5 mL of initial solutions of different concentrations.
In the initial solutions (Figure 6, dotted lines), MB shows two bands at 664 nm and 610 nm that have been attributed to the monomer and dimer forms, respectively [50]. As initial concentration decreases, the intensity of the monomer band increases at the expense of the dimer band, indicating, as expected, a decrease in dimer content as MB concentration decreases. In the UV–Vis absorption spectrum of the hydrogel upon elution of a 25 mg/L solution, the dimer band is attenuated significantly, and the spectrum resembles those reported for the monomeric MB in aqueous solution or adsorbed on a surface [54]. Thus, MB initially adsorbs as a monomer even if the initial solution has a high content of dimer. We hypothesized that this first adsorption process is governed by strong MB-adsorbent electrostatic interactions that predominate over the MB–MB interaction responsible for the dimer formation. Upon elution of a 50 mg/L solution, the hydrogel shows that the dimer band intensity increases slightly. When dye concentration is further increased to 100 mg/L, the spectrum changes significantly. The absorption band is broader; monomer and dimer bands have similar intensities, and an intense blue-shifted tail appears. Thus, at higher concentrations, MB first saturates electrostatic adsorption sites, and only the monomer form is found on the surface of the hydrogel. Afterwards, probably with the high concentration as driving force, extra MB molecules are adsorbed, now through π–π interactions and formation of the dimeric form of MB on the surface of the adsorbent is favored. The blue-shifted tail may indicate the formation of higher order aggregates of MB, but we cannot rule out MB–pyrene interactions.
We also investigated how the variation of the volume of initial solution affects the adsorption capability of the hydrogel (Table 1, entries 3, 6, 7). To do so, 2.5, 5, and 10 mL of a MB solution at 50 mg/L were eluted through 1 mL of GdL–gel. We found the same trend when initial MB concentrations were varied at a fixed volume. Thus, the adsorption process seems to be mainly affected by the mass ratio of adsorbent/MB, and it takes place as described in the previous paragraph. Indeed, the UV–Vis spectrum of the hydrogel upon elution of 10 mL of a 50 mg/L solution of MB is superimposable to that obtained after elution of 5 mL of a 100 mg/L solution of the dye (Figure 6).

2.5. Adsorption of PhACs

We then tested the GdL gel for the adsorption of a series of representative PhACs. We chose the NSAIDs diclofenac sodium salt (DCF), the antibiotics ciprofloxacin (CIP) and nalidixic acid sodium salt (NAL) and the anticonvulsant carbamazepine (CBZ). In all cases, 5 mL of a 50 mg/mL pollutant solution was eluted through 1 mL of GdL gel, and the pollutant concentration in the eluted solution was determined by UV–Vis spectroscopy. Under these conditions, we found that the best performances were obtained with DCF (RE 75%), followed by CIP (RE 40%), while CBZ and NAL showed the worst results (RE 21% and 24%, respectively) (Table 2, entries 1–4). That CBZ, with the largest π-surface, is adsorbed worse than DCF suggests that π–π interactions are not the main forces involved in the adsorption process. On the other hand, electrostatic interactions may be somewhat favorable for the case of CIP, containing a basic amine, but this do not justify the better performance in the adsorption of DCF. Both DCF and CIP structures contain groups capable of stablish hydrogen bonds, but also contain halogen atoms, so halogen bonding may also play an important role in the adsorption process. To study the possible role of halogen bonding, we tested the adsorption of the dehalogenated DCF analogue. However, we found that this compound is not stable under the working conditions, and the results were not conclusive (see Supporting Information for details).
The effect of the initial concentration on adsorption was investigated for DCF, which gave the best RE among the PhACs tested. Data are summarized in Table 2, entries 4–6. The data reveal that RE increases as the initial concentration increases. On the other hand, when the volume of the solution was changed at a fixed concentration of 50 mg/L, the RE increased when the volume decreased (Table 2, entries 4, 7, 8).
The increase in RE with initial pollutant concentration has been explained in the literature as an improved diffusion and mass transfer process that is favored at higher concentrations, accompanied by an augmented number of collisions between pollutant molecules and the adsorbent, which favors adsorption [55,56]. When the volume of the solution is increased at a fixed initial concentration, we hypothesized that the concentration of the solution on top of the gel does not remain constant throughout the experiment and that diffusion of DCF into the hydrogel may occur faster than the elution process, such that the concentration of DCF in the remaining solution decreases overtime. As a consequence, the driving force of the concentration loses its positive effect.

3. Conclusions

We have described a new peptide–pyrene hybrid gelator that forms stable hydrogels at acidic pH. Hydrogels obtained by acidification with GdL were successfully employed for the removal of a number of dyes and PhACs from water. In particular, the best results were achieved for the dye MB and the anti-inflammatory drug DCF. The effect of initial concentration and volume was studied for the two aforementioned molecules. Data revealed that adsorption of MB is mainly affected by the mass ratio of adsorbent/hydrogel. First, the monomeric form of the cationic dye adsorbed through electrostatic interactions until saturation of the charged adsorption sites. Afterwards, higher concentrations of dye were adsorbed through dimerization /polymerization of the dye on the hydrogel surface. On the other hand, DCF adsorption was favored at higher concentrations, and no saturation behavior was detected in the range of concentrations investigated. In the case of DCF, the concentration appears to be the driving force of the adsorption process: it improves the mass transfer and increases the chance of collision between DCF molecules and the active sites of the hydrogel.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. General Methods

ESI-MS spectra were recorded using an ESI-TOF MarinerTM BiospectrometryTM Workstation of Applied Biosystems by flow injection analysis (mobile phase methanol with 0.1% formic).
1H and 13C were recorded in deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide at 25 °C at a frequency of 300 MHz. The residual solvent peak was used as internal reference. Chemical shifts (δ) are expressed in parts per million (ppm). The multiplicity of a signal is indicated as s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), dd (doublet of doublets), dt (doublet of triplets), td (Triplet of doublets), q (quartet) and m (multiplet). The acronym “br” indicates a broadened signal.
FT-IR spectra were measured on a FT-IR Perkin-Elmer 1720X spectrophotometer, in KBr disk, using a resolution of 2 cm−1, a total of 100 scans were averaged.
UV–Vis absorption spectra were measured on a Varian Cary 50 spectrophotometer at 25 °C. For solution samples, a reduced volume quartz cell with 0.1 cm, 0.4 cm, or 1 cm optical path was used. Gels were analysed using a rectangular cell with detachable windows and 0.2 mm of optical. Gels were prepared in a glass vial; a small amount was transferred to the sample chamber and the cell was carefully closed to avoid the formation of bubbles
Emission spectra were measured on a Varian CaryEclipse spectrophotometer at 25 °C. A quartz cell with optical path of 10 × 2 mm and volume 500 μL or 10 × 4 mm and volume 1400 μL was used for the solutions. Gels were analysed using a 500 μL quartz cell with an optical path of 10 × 2 mm. Gels were prepared directly inside the cuvette
CD spectra were measured on a Jasco J-1500 instrument at 25 °C and were baseline corrected, a total of 64 measurements were averaged. The spectra are expressed in terms of total molar ellipticity (deg⸱cm2⸱dmol−1). Solutions were analysed using a reduced volume quartz cell with 0.1 cm, 0.4 cm or 1 cm optical path. Gels were analysed using a rectangular cell with detachable windows and optical path of 0.2 mm. Gels were prepared in a glass vial; a small amount was transferred to the sample chamber, and the cell was carefully closed.
TEM images were recorded on a Jeol 300 PX instrument using glow discharged carbon coated grids. Gels were diluted prior to analysis; 10 μL of the sample were then deposited directly on a grid, and the excess of sample was removed with #50 hardened Whatman filter paper; no staining was used. The images were analyzed with the ImageJ program.
Oscillatory rheology was performed on a Kinexus Lab+ rheometer with parallel plate geometry. 1 mL of hydrogel was prepared in a glass mold with a diameter of 2 cm and placed onto the lower plate. A thermal cover was used, and temperature was set at 25 °C using a Peltier temperature controller. Frequency sweeps were recorded between 10–0.001 Hz at a constant strain. Strain sweeps were carried out between 0.01–110% at a constant frequency of 1 Hz. Step strain experiments were performed applying cycles of deformation and recovery steps. The first step (rest conditions) was performed at a fixed frequency of 0.1 Hz and at a strain of γ = 0.1% (within the LVE region) for a period of 5 min. The deformation step was performed at a fixed frequency of 0.1 Hz, applying a constant strain of γ = 150%, (above the LVE region) for a period of 5 min. Deformation and recovery steps were repeated three times.

4.2. Synthesis of 2

All reagents and solvents were purchased from Irish Biotech or Merck and were used as received. Compound 2 was synthesized by solid phase 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl (Fmoc) chemistry on Rink amide resin using stablished procedures [42].
ESI-MS: [M + Na]+ calculated for C48H49N5O9 862.34, found: 862.5.
1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): δ 12.01 (bs, COOH), 8.36 (d, 1H, J = 9.3 Hz), 8.31–7.88 (m, 11H), 7.33 (d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.29–6.94 (m, 12H, overlapping signal Ar of Phe and NH2), 4.63–4.33 (m, 2H, Hα, Phe), 4.33–4.10 (m, 4H, Hα Glu), 3.06–2.89 (m, 2H, Hβ, Phe), 2.87–2.65 (m, 2H, Hβ, Phe), 2.35–2.07 (m, 6H, overlapping signal Hγ Glu and methylene linker), 2.04–1.92 (m, 2H, methylene linker), 1.89–1.5 (m, 4H, Hβ, Glu) ppm.
13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): δ 174.43, 174.40, 173.08, 172.76, 171.83, 171.46, 171.12, 138.18, 138.13, 137.04, 131.35, 130.90, 129.76, 129.62, 129.56, 128.63, 128.47, 128.38, 128.04, 127.92, 127.67, 126.96, 126.67, 126.59, 125.39, 125.23, 124.69, 124.62, 124.01, 54.12, 52.62, 52.43, 37.97, 37.53, 35.22, 32.66, 30.61, 30.51, 27.91, 27.77, 27.58, 18.31, 12.53.
FT-IR (KBr): ν~ (cm−1) = 3395, 3286, 3086, 3061, 3032, 2940, 1734, 1719, 1650, 1617, 1544, 1498, 1453, 1443, 1415, 1340, 1322, 1315, 1273, 1244, 1236, 1207, 1201, 1182, 1170, 842, 742, 719, 699.

4.3. Gel Preparation

HCl-triggered gelation: A known amount of 2 was introduced in a 4 mL glass vial. Then, 900 μL of MilliQ water was added, followed by NaOH 1M (1.8 eq). A clear solution was obtained with the aid of sonication. Then, MilliQ water and HCl solution (0.5M, 2 eq.) were added to obtain a self-supporting gel with the desired final concentration. Gel formation was assessed by the vial inversion test.
GdL-triggered gelation: A known amount of 2 was introduced in a 4 mL glass vial. Then, 900 μL of milliQ water was added. NaOH 1M (1.8 eq.) was added, and a clear solution was obtained with the aid of sonication. The desired final concentration was reached through the addition of milliQ water. Then, a known amount of GdL (3 eq.) was added, and the mixture was vortexed and left at room temperature overnight. Gel formation was assessed by the vial inversion test.

4.4. Gel Preparation in Syringes

A volume of 1 mL gel at 0.5% concentration was prepared as follows: 5 mg of 2 was introduced to a 4 mL vial. Then, 900 μL of MilliQ water was added. NaOH 1M (1.8 equiv. 11 μL) was added, and a clear solution was obtained with the aid of sonication. MilliQ water was then added to reach a volume of 1 mL. Then, GdL (3 eq., 3.5 mg) was added, and the mixture was vortexed and immediately transferred into a 5 mL syringe that was sealed at the bottom. The mixture was allowed to rest at room temperature overnight to allow gel formation. Gel formation was assessed by the syringe inversion test.

4.5. Adsorption Experiments

Dye and PhAC stock solutions at 200 mg/L were prepared in MilliQ water. All other solutions were prepared by dilution of stock solutions. For all pollutants, UV–Vis absorption calibration curves were obtained in the range of concentrations between 5 mg/L and 50 mg/L. By plotting the maximum absorbance vs. concentration, the molar extinction coefficient for each dye and PhAC was determined (see Supporting Information for details). Adsorption experiments were performed in triplicate; only the average RE value is given. Here, 1 mL of gel at 0.5% concentration was prepared in a syringe. A known volume of dye or PhAC solution was loaded on top of the gel, and the solution was allowed to flow through the gel by gravity. The eluted solution was recovered in a vial. When the pollutant solution had passed through the gel, the eluted solution was analyzed by UV–Vis spectroscopy. The concentration of the pollutant was determined using the Lambert Beer equation A = εCl, where A is the absorbance, ε the molar extinction coefficient (mol L−1 cm−1), C the concentration of pollutant (mol L−1), and l the path length (cm).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/gels8100672/s1, Scheme S1: synthesis of 2, Figure S1: ESI-MS of compound 2, Figure S2: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) of 2, Figure S3: 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) of 2, Figure S4: FT-IR spectrum of 2 (KBr disk), Figure S5: Photographs of 0.1% GdL gel before and after heating Figure S6: Photos of HCl-triggered gel, Figure S7: Normalized absorption (solid-line) and emission (dotted-line) spectra of HCl-triggered gel (0.5%), Figure S8: CD spectrum of HCl-triggered gel (0.5%), Figure S9: TEM images of HCl-triggered gel, Figure S10: Non-normalized emission spectra of 2 diluted solution (green), 0.5% solution (red) and GdL gel 0.5% (blue), Figure S11: (Top) inversion of the syringe after the process to demonstrate the stability of the gel after the adsorption of pollutants; (bottom) UV-vis spectrum of eluted MB showing the absence of 2 in the eluted sample, Table S1: Calibration curve slope and relative wavelength, Table S2. Removal efficiency and adsorption capacities for the adsorption of dyes and PhACs. Figure S12: UV-vis normalized absorption spectra of dyes and PhACs used, Figure S13: Schematic representation of gel formation, Scheme S2: synthesis of dehalogenated DCF, Figure S14: ESI-MS of dehalogenated DCF, Figure S15: 1H NMR (MeOD, 300 MHz) of dehalogenated DCF.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.F. and M.M.; investigation, A.F. and M.M., writing—original draft preparation, A.F. and M.M.; writing—review and editing, M.M.; visualization, A.F.; supervision, M.M.; project administration, M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by University of Padova (P-DiSC#05BIRD2021-UNIPD).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Patel, M.; Kumar, R.; Kishor, K.; Mlsna, T.; Pittman, C.U.; Mohan, D. Pharmaceuticals of Emerging Concern in Aquatic Systems: Chemistry, Occurrence, Effects, and Removal Methods. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 3510–3673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Glassmeyer, S.T.; Hinchey, E.K.; Boehme, S.E.; Daughton, C.G.; Ruhoy, I.S.; Conerly, O.; Daniels, R.L.; Lauer, L.; McCarthy, M.; Nettesheim, T.G.; et al. Disposal practices for unwanted residential medications in the United States. Environ. Int. 2009, 35, 566–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Valcárcel, Y.; González Alonso, S.; Rodríguez-Gil, J.L.; Gil, A.; Catalá, M. Detection of pharmaceutically active compounds in the rivers and tap water of the Madrid Region (Spain) and potential ecotoxicological risk. Chemosphere 2011, 84, 1336–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dolar, D.; Ignjatić Zokić, T.; Košutić, K.; Ašperger, D.; Mutavdžić Pavlović, D. RO/NF membrane treatment of veterinary pharmaceutical wastewater: Comparison of results obtained on a laboratory and a pilot scale. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2012, 19, 1033–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Majumder, A.; Gupta, B.; Gupta, A.K. Pharmaceutically active compounds in aqueous environment: A status, toxicity and insights of remediation. Environ. Res. 2019, 176, 108542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kaya, S.I.; Gumus, E.; Cetinkaya, A.; Zor, E.; Ozkan, S.A. Trends in on-site removal, treatment, and sensitive assay of common pharmaceuticals in surface waters. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2022, 149, 116556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kant, R. Textile dyeing industry an environmental hazard. Nat. Sci. 2011, 4, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Khan, I.; Saeed, K.; Zekker, I.; Zhang, B.; Hendi, A.H.; Ahmad, A.; Ahmad, S.; Zada, N.; Ahmad, H.; Shah, L.A. Review on methylene blue: Its properties, uses, toxicity and photodegradation. Water 2022, 14, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gadipelly, C.; Pérez-González, A.; Yadav, G.D.; Ortiz, I.; Ibáñez, R.; Rathod, V.K.; Marathe, K.V. Pharmaceutical Industry Wastewater: Review of the Technologies for Water Treatment and Reuse. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 11571–11592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Katheresan, V.; Kansedo, J.; Lau, S.Y. Efficiency of various recent wastewater dye removal methods: A review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 4676–4697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Polak, D.; Zielińska, I.; Szwast, M.; Kogut, I.; Małolepszy, A. Modification of Ceramic Membranes with Carbon Compounds for Pharmaceutical Substances Removal from Water in a Filtration—Adsorption System. Membranes 2021, 11, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. de Andrade, J.R.; Oliveira, M.F.; da Silva, M.G.C.; Vieira, M.G.A. Adsorption of Pharmaceuticals from Water and Wastewater Using Nonconventional Low-Cost Materials: A Review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 3103–3127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dutta, S.; Gupta, B.; Srivastava, S.K.; Gupta, A.K. Recent advances on the removal of dyes from wastewater using various adsorbents: A critical review. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 4497–4531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Seida, Y.; Tokuyama, H. Hydrogel Adsorbents for the Removal of Hazardous Pollutants-Requirements and Available Functions as Adsorbent. Gels 2022, 8, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Godiya, C.B.; Ruotolo, L.A.M.; Cai, W.Q. Functional biobased hydrogels for the removal of aqueous hazardous pollutants: Current status, challenges, and future perspectives. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 21585–21612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Okesola, B.O.; Smith, D.K. Applying low-molecular weight supramolecular gelators in an environmental setting—self-assembled gels as smart materials for pollutant removal. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 4226–4251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Apostolopoulos, V.; Bojarska, J.; Chai, T.-T.; Elnagdy, S.; Kaczmarek, K.; Matsoukas, J.; New, R.; Parang, K.; Lopez, O.P.; Parhiz, H. A global review on short peptides: Frontiers and perspectives. Molecules 2021, 26, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Das, R.; Gayakvad, B.; Shinde, S.D.; Rath, J.; Jain, A.; Sahu, B. Ultrashort Peptides-A Glimpse into the Structural Modifications and Their Applications as Biomaterials. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020, 3, 5474–5499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hu, X.; Liao, M.; Gong, H.; Zhang, L.; Cox, H.; Waigh, T.A.; Lu, J.R. Recent advances in short peptide self-assembly: From rational design to novel applications. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 45, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ekiz, M.S.; Cinar, G.; Khalily, M.A.; Guler, M.O. Self-assembled peptide nanostructures for functional materials. Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 402002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Levin, A.; Hakala, T.A.; Schnaider, L.; Bernardes, G.J.L.; Gazit, E.; Knowles, T.P.J. Biomimetic peptide self-assembly for functional materials. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2020, 4, 615–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Edwards-Gayle, C.J.C.; Hamley, I.W. Self-assembly of bioactive peptides, peptide conjugates, and peptide mimetic materials. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 5867–5876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Fichman, G.; Gazit, E. Self-assembly of short peptides to form hydrogels: Design of building blocks, physical properties and technological applications. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10, 1671–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mondal, S.; Das, S.; Nandi, A.K. A review on recent advances in polymer and peptide hydrogels. Soft Matter 2020, 16, 1404–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kurbasic, M.; Garcia, A.M.; Viada, S.; Marchesan, S. Tripeptide Self-Assembly into Bioactive Hydrogels: Effects of Terminus Modification on Biocatalysis. Molecules 2021, 26, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, J.; Kim, C. Peptide Materials for Smart Therapeutic Applications. Macromol. Res. 2021, 29, 2–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Das, S.; Das, D. Rational design of peptide-based smart hydrogels for therapeutic applications. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 770102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. La Manna, S.; Di Natale, C.; Onesto, V.; Marasco, D. Self-Assembling Peptides: From Design to Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, J.; Xing, R.; Bai, S.; Yan, X. Recent advances of self-assembling peptide-based hydrogels for biomedical applications. Soft Matter 2019, 15, 1704–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ardoña, H.A.M.; Tovar, J.D. Peptide π-electron conjugates: Organic electronics for biology? Bioconjugate Chem. 2015, 26, 2290–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Panda, S.S.; Katz, H.E.; Tovar, J.D. Solid-state electrical applications of protein and peptide based nanomaterials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 3640–3658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tena-Solsona, M.; Nanda, J.; Díaz-Oltra, S.; Chotera, A.; Ashkenasy, G.; Escuder, B. Emergent Catalytic Behavior of Self-Assembled Low Molecular Weight Peptide-Based Aggregates and Hydrogels. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 6687–6694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Conejero-Muriel, M.; Contreras-Montoya, R.; Díaz-Mochón, J.J.; de Cienfuegos, L.Á.; Gavira, J.A. Protein crystallization in short-peptide supramolecular hydrogels: A versatile strategy towards biotechnological composite materials. CrystEngComm 2015, 17, 8072–8078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Bachl, J.; Oehm, S.; Mayr, J.; Cativiela, C.; Marrero-Tellado, J.J.; Díaz Díaz, D. Supramolecular Phase-Selective Gelation by Peptides Bearing Side-Chain Azobenzenes: Effect of Ultrasound and Potential for Dye Removal and Oil Spill Remediation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 11766–11784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Chetia, M.; Debnath, S.; Chowdhury, S.; Chatterjee, S. Self-assembly and multifunctionality of peptide organogels: Oil spill recovery, dye absorption and synthesis of conducting biomaterials. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 5220–5233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Basak, S.; Nanda, J.; Banerjee, A. A new aromatic amino acid based organogel for oil spill recovery. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 11658–11664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Debnath, S.; Shome, A.; Dutta, S.; Das, P.K. Dipeptide-based low-molecular-weight efficient organogelators and their application in water purification. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 6870–6881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mondal, B.; Bairagi, D.; Nandi, N.; Hansda, B.; Das, K.S.; Edwards-Gayle, C.J.C.; Castelletto, V.; Hamley, I.W.; Banerjee, A. Peptide-Based Gel in Environmental Remediation: Removal of Toxic Organic Dyes and Hazardous Pb2+ and Cd2+ Ions from Wastewater and Oil Spill Recovery. Langmuir 2020, 36, 12942–12953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wood, D.M.; Greenland, B.W.; Acton, A.L.; Rodríguez-Llansola, F.; Murray, C.A.; Cardin, C.J.; Miravet, J.F.; Escuder, B.; Hamley, I.W.; Hayes, W. pH-Tunable Hydrogelators for Water Purification: Structural Optimisation and Evaluation. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 2692–2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Roy, K.; Chetia, M.; Sarkar, A.K.; Chatterjee, S. Co-assembly of charge complementary peptides and their applications as organic dye/heavy metal ion (Pb2+, Hg2+) absorbents and arsenic(iii/v) detectors. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 42062–42075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Giuri, D.; D’Agostino, S.; Ravarino, P.; Faccio, D.; Falini, G.; Tomasini, C. Water Remediation from Pollutant Agents by the Use of an Environmentally Friendly Supramolecular Hydrogel. Chemnanomat 2022, 8, e202200093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fortunato, A.; Mba, M. Metal Cation Triggered Peptide Hydrogels and Their Application in Food Freshness Monitoring and Dye Adsorption. Gels 2021, 7, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bowerman, C.J.; Nilsson, B.L. Review self-assembly of amphipathic β-sheet peptides: Insights and applications. Pept. Sci. 2012, 98, 169–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Winnik, F.M. Photophysics of preassociated pyrenes in aqueous polymer solutions and in other organized media. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 587–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dawn, A.; Kumari, H. Low Molecular Weight Supramolecular Gels Under Shear: Rheology as the Tool for Elucidating Structure–Function Correlation. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 762–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lee, N.R.; Bowerman, C.J.; Nilsson, B.L. Effects of Varied Sequence Pattern on the Self-Assembly of Amphipathic Peptides. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 3267–3277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Greenfield, N.J.; Fasman, G.D. Computed circular dichroism spectra for the evaluation of protein conformation. Biochemistry 1969, 8, 4108–4116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kelly, S.M.; Jess, T.J.; Price, N.C. How to study proteins by circular dichroism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Proteins Proteom. 2005, 1751, 119–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Garifullin, R.; Guler, M.O. Supramolecular chirality in self-assembled peptide amphiphile nanostructures. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 12470–12473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fernández-Pérez, A.; Marbán, G. Visible Light Spectroscopic Analysis of Methylene Blue in Water; What Comes after Dimer? ACS Omega 2020, 5, 29801–29815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Avena, M.J.; Valenti, L.E.; Pfaffen, V.; De Pauli, C.P. Methylene Blue Dimerization Does Not Interfere in Surface-Area Measurements of Kaolinite and Soils. Clays Clay Miner. 2001, 49, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, B.; Wen, L.; Nakata, K.; Zhao, X.; Liu, S.; Ochiai, T.; Murakami, T.; Fujishima, A. Polymeric Adsorption of Methylene Blue in TiO2 Colloids—Highly Sensitive Thermochromism and Selective Photocatalysis. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 12705–12711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dolia, V.; James, A.L.; Chakrabarty, S.; Jasuja, K. Dissimilar adsorption of higher-order aggregates compared with monomers and dimers of methylene blue on graphene oxide: An optical spectroscopic perspective. Carbon Trends 2021, 4, 100066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bergmann, K.; O’Konski, C.T. A Spectroscopic Study of Methylene Blue Monomer, Dimer, and Complexes with Montmorillonite. J. Phys. Chem. 1963, 67, 2169–2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rápó, E.; Tonk, S. Factors Affecting Synthetic Dye Adsorption; Desorption Studies: A Review of Results from the Last Five Years (2017–2021). Molecules 2021, 26, 5419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Akhtar, J.; Amin, N.A.S.; Shahzad, K. A review on removal of pharmaceuticals from water by adsorption. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016, 57, 12842–12860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gels 08 00672 g001 550
Figure 1. Structure of previously reported peptide 1, and structures of peptide 2, dyes, and PhACs employed in the present work.
Figure 1. Structure of previously reported peptide 1, and structures of peptide 2, dyes, and PhACs employed in the present work.
Gels 08 00672 g001
Gels 08 00672 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Photographs of vials containing from left to right: the peptide at 0.5% in solution, the GdL gel, and the HCl gel; (B) frequency sweep of the HCl gel (blue) and the GdL gel (red) at 0.5% concentration, where G’ values are indicated with filled circles and G’’ is indicated with open circles; (C) strain sweep of the GdL gel at 0.5% concentration; (D) dynamic strain amplitude cyclic test of the GdL gel at 0.5% concentration.
Figure 2. (A) Photographs of vials containing from left to right: the peptide at 0.5% in solution, the GdL gel, and the HCl gel; (B) frequency sweep of the HCl gel (blue) and the GdL gel (red) at 0.5% concentration, where G’ values are indicated with filled circles and G’’ is indicated with open circles; (C) strain sweep of the GdL gel at 0.5% concentration; (D) dynamic strain amplitude cyclic test of the GdL gel at 0.5% concentration.
Gels 08 00672 g002
Gels 08 00672 g003 550
Figure 3. TEM micrographs of GdL xerogels at 0.5% concentration.
Figure 3. TEM micrographs of GdL xerogels at 0.5% concentration.
Gels 08 00672 g003
Gels 08 00672 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) UV–Vis absorption (solid line), emission spectra (dotted line), and (B) CD spectra of peptide 2 in solution and the GdL gel.
Figure 4. (A) UV–Vis absorption (solid line), emission spectra (dotted line), and (B) CD spectra of peptide 2 in solution and the GdL gel.
Gels 08 00672 g004
Gels 08 00672 g005 550
Figure 5. Adsorption experiment setup: (A) the gel is placed inside a syringe; (B) the solution of MB is allowed to flow through the gel; (C) upon elution, the gel maintains its mechanical stability and does not flow when the syringe is turned upside down.
Figure 5. Adsorption experiment setup: (A) the gel is placed inside a syringe; (B) the solution of MB is allowed to flow through the gel; (C) upon elution, the gel maintains its mechanical stability and does not flow when the syringe is turned upside down.
Gels 08 00672 g005
Gels 08 00672 g006 550
Figure 6. UV–Vis absorption spectra of the initial MB solutions (dotted line) and MB adsorbed on the hydrogel (solid line) upon elution of 5 mL of a 25 mg/L (black), 50 mg/L (red), and 100 mg/L (blue) solution of MB, and upon elution of 10 mL of a 50 mg/L (green) solution of MB.
Figure 6. UV–Vis absorption spectra of the initial MB solutions (dotted line) and MB adsorbed on the hydrogel (solid line) upon elution of 5 mL of a 25 mg/L (black), 50 mg/L (red), and 100 mg/L (blue) solution of MB, and upon elution of 10 mL of a 50 mg/L (green) solution of MB.
Gels 08 00672 g006
Table
Table 1. Removal efficiency of dyes. 1 mL of GdL-gel at 0.5% (adsorbent dosage 5 mg) was used.
Table 1. Removal efficiency of dyes. 1 mL of GdL-gel at 0.5% (adsorbent dosage 5 mg) was used.
EntryDyeC0 (mg/L)V (mL)mdye (μg)RE 1 (%)
1MO50525016
2RhB50525050
3MB50525090
4MB255125100
5MB100550091
6MB502.512599.5
7MB501050090
1 Average values over 3 tests.
Table
Table 2. Removal efficiency of PhACs. 1 mL of GdL gel at 0.5% (adsorbent dosage 5 mg) was used.
Table 2. Removal efficiency of PhACs. 1 mL of GdL gel at 0.5% (adsorbent dosage 5 mg) was used.
EntryDyeC0 (mg/L)V (mL)mPhAC (μg)RE 1 (%)
1NAL50525021
2CBZ50525024
3CIP50525040
4DCF50525075
5DCF25512559
6DCF100550089
7DCF502.512583
8DCF501050053
1 Average values over 3 tests.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fortunato, A.; Mba, M. A Peptide-Based Hydrogel for Adsorption of Dyes and Pharmaceuticals in Water Remediation. Gels 2022, 8, 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8100672

AMA Style

Fortunato A, Mba M. A Peptide-Based Hydrogel for Adsorption of Dyes and Pharmaceuticals in Water Remediation. Gels. 2022; 8(10):672. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8100672

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fortunato, Anna, and Miriam Mba. 2022. "A Peptide-Based Hydrogel for Adsorption of Dyes and Pharmaceuticals in Water Remediation" Gels 8, no. 10: 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8100672

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop